Driving Effective Data Governance For Improved Quality and Analytics
Driving Effective Data Governance For Improved Quality and Analytics
Driving Effective Data Governance For Improved Quality and Analytics
Simply put, data is the new currency of digital transformation—and with that power comes responsibility. “We actually
have to think of data like code,” says Damon Buono, senior director for Enterprise Information Management at
Microsoft. “The way forward is a data-driven culture—where everyone understands and agrees that data is a strategic
asset.”
Figure 1 shows how data-driven decision-making cuts across organizational and functional boundaries.
Figure 1. Applying data science to improve decision making, optimize operations, and drive strategy
It’s a governance gap that accentuates the risks inherent in the increasing volume and complexity of structured and
unstructured data. We experimented with different approaches, like forming a centralized data governance board and
initiating topic-based data governance. None yielded the results we were looking for.
“We realized over time that to drive cultural change, we have to drive data management visibility at the top for the
quality and ownership questions to start being asked,” Buono says.
CSEO is chartered with driving Enterprise Information Management, which it defines as an “…integrative discipline for
structuring, describing, and governing information assets across organizational and technological boundaries to
improve efficiency, promote transparency, and enable business insight.”
What does that look like? Fundamentally, it involves cleaning up data today and implementing a framework for the
future so that data is ready for use by business groups across Microsoft. Specifically, it includes assigning and
implementing accountability and stewardship, ensuring accuracy and discoverability, and implementing role-base
access to data.
As shown in Figure 2, roles and responsibilities change across organizational levels in a manner that resembles
governmental decision making. The local level of governance happens at the individual team level. The state level
represents governance occurring at the organization level and the federal level denotes the overarching governance
across all organizations. At the base of the pyramid, each business unit empowers stewards to manage the data that
belongs solely to their functional unit. When data touches multiple functional or business units, ownership shifts to
data domain stewards, driving overall data excellence. Any issues that remain unresolved get escalated to corporate
decision makers responsible for enterprise strategy or—if necessary—to top executive levels.
Figure 2. Driving the data quality lifecycle from enterprise strategy to operations
1. Collect evidence of a problem. Our data stewards continually monitor systems for data management anomalies
and prioritize fixing issues with the greatest opportunity costs and business impacts.
2. Explain problem. They develop “problem statements" using data and metrics as the key to effectively
communicating issue scope at the executive level.
3. Spotlight problem with executives. We hold regular data quality forums with senior leaders and executives to
highlight and discuss the most critical issues.
4. Drive resolution. With executive approval, they secure the appropriate resources and expertise needed to drive
resolution across teams, helping stakeholders understand the costs accruing from the data management gaps.
5. Fix underlying gaps. Discovering inconsistencies in our data management processes helps prioritize
improvements to fill these gaps.
6. Preventative action. Regularly highlighting data quality issues with senior leaders and executives prompts teams
to scrutinize their procedures and implement remedies to reduce the risk of recurring issues.
Next steps
Addressing data quality issues that span data stores across multiple organizations—with no defined owner—ranks
among our highest priorities. To meet this challenge, the Enterprise Information Management team drives
troubleshooting with vested executive authority to implement specific solutions. By using metrics and data to identify
problems and articulate business impacts, our data management team is now getting traction dispatching the right
individuals or teams to get the job done.
Already, the difference is being felt in major areas, including sales, marketing, finance, and services. No longer is the
team stuck in reactive mode and logjammed with fixing data. Now they’re implementing end-to-end data
management practices during the design/build phase of strategic programs—instead of retrofitting data later.
Microsoft is hardly alone in this endeavor; almost every large company is in the process of transitioning from old
warehouse models to hyperscale, big data infrastructure in the cloud. There is now a growing body of work across
industries around implementing and operationalizing data governance goals.
Working with Gartner and others, we’ve developed an internal data fundamentals playbook that incorporates industry
best practices. Next steps include completing a maturity assessment toolkit leading to a measurable data health
index.
“We want to evolve and learn by deploying these fundamentals first in a few strategic programs,” says Kandy Samy, a
director in the Enterprise and Information Management team. “Then we’ll roll them out more broadly with a long-
term vision of automating the data management practices and controls for easier adoption.”
© 2018 Microsoft Corporation. This document is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, IN THIS SUMMARY. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective
owners.