Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 32 views

    Criminal Law 2 Quiz 3

    Uploaded by

    Zubair Batua
    The document discusses 5 cases involving groups committing potential crimes according to Article 134 of the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines. In the first two cases, the groups committed rebellion by rising up publicly and with arms against the government to remove territory from its control or laws. The third case involved sedition, as the group rose tumultuously to prevent elections. The fourth case found no crime as the elements of sedition were not met. The fifth case was also sedition, as the group disturbed the state and forced laws to be enacted.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Criminal Law 2 Quiz 3

    Uploaded by

    Zubair Batua
    32 views1 page
    The document discusses 5 cases involving groups committing potential crimes according to Article 134 of the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines. In the first two cases, the groups committed rebellion by rising up publicly and with arms against the government to remove territory from its control or laws. The third case involved sedition, as the group rose tumultuously to prevent elections. The fourth case found no crime as the elements of sedition were not met. The fifth case was also sedition, as the group disturbed the state and forced laws to be enacted.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses 5 cases involving groups committing potential crimes according to Article 134 of the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines. In the first two cases, the groups committed rebellion by rising up publicly and with arms against the government to remove territory from its control or laws. The third case involved sedition, as the group rose tumultuously to prevent elections. The fourth case found no crime as the elements of sedition were not met. The fifth case was also sedition, as the group disturbed the state and forced laws to be enacted.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    32 views1 page

    Criminal Law 2 Quiz 3

    Uploaded by

    Zubair Batua
    The document discusses 5 cases involving groups committing potential crimes according to Article 134 of the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines. In the first two cases, the groups committed rebellion by rising up publicly and with arms against the government to remove territory from its control or laws. The third case involved sedition, as the group rose tumultuously to prevent elections. The fourth case found no crime as the elements of sedition were not met. The fifth case was also sedition, as the group disturbed the state and forced laws to be enacted.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    1. The crime committed by the group is rebellion.

    According to Article 134 of the Revised Penal


    Code, the crime of rebellion is committed by rising publicly and takings arms against the
    Government for the purpose of removing from the allegiance to said Government or its laws the
    territory of the Philippines. Here, the attack of the group constitutes public uprising and taking
    arms against the government; moreover, the objective of the group was to separate and control
    the Muslim-dominated areas of the Philippines for their inclusion islands, which is to overthrow
    and supersede the existing government. Hence, they committed a crime of rebellion.
    2. The crime committed by the group is also rebellion. According to Article 134 of the Revised
    Penal Code, the crime of rebellion is committed by rising publicly and takings arms against the
    Government for the purpose of removing the laws of the Government, the territory of the
    Philippines or any part thereof. Here, the attack of the group constitutes public uprising and
    taking arms against the government; moreover, the objective of the group was to clean the City
    from non-muslim and un-islamic activities, which is remove the laws of any part of the
    Philippines. Therefore, they committed a crime of rebellion.
    3. The crime committed by the group is sedition. According to Article 134 of the Revised Penal
    Code, the crime of sedition is committed by persons who rise publicly and tumultuously in order
    to attain by force the holding of any popular election. Here, the attack of the group is
    tumultuous, which causes disturbances to the State, and they employed force to prevent the
    holding of any popular election and decide in favour of their chosen candidates. Therefore, the
    committed a crime of sedition.
    4. The group has not committed any crime. According to Article 134 of the Revised Penal Code, the
    crime of sedition is committed by persons who rise publicly and tumultuously in order to attain
    by force the holding of any popular election. Here, the elements of sedition are lacking, the
    group didn’t rise publicly nor tumultuously; furthermore, the latter didn’t employ force. Or
    other means to attain their objective. Therefore, group has not committed any crime.
    5. The crime committed by the group is sedition. According to Article 134 of the Revised Penal
    Code, the crime of sedition is committed by persons who rise publicly and tumultuously in order
    to attain by force the execution of any law. Here, the attack of the group constitutes a
    disturbance to the State and forced the government to enact and pass comprehensive
    agreement, which prevent the National Government from freely exercising its functions.
    Therefore, the group committed a crime of sedition.

    You might also like