From Power To Cultural Landscapes Rewriting History of Shi Ah in Aceh
From Power To Cultural Landscapes Rewriting History of Shi Ah in Aceh
From Power To Cultural Landscapes Rewriting History of Shi Ah in Aceh
DOI: 10.15642/JIIS.2017.11.2.509-530
Introduction
This article aims to examine the history of Shi’ah 1 in Aceh by
looking at the influence of Persia in the province. There have been two
1 The overview on Shi‘ah in Indonesian languages, see Abdul Azis Dahlan (ed.),
Ensiklopedi Hukum Islam, vol. 5 (Jakarta: PT Ichtiar Baru van Hoeve, 1997), pp. 1072-
1708. Aboebakar Atjeh, Aliran Syi’ah Di Nusantara (Jakarta: Islamic Research Institute,
1977). Dicky Sofjan, ed., Sejarah & Budaya Syiah Di Asia Tenggara (Yogyakarta: Sekolah
Pascasarjana Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2013). Imam Ghozali, AM Safwan, and Edy Y.
Syarif, eds., Peran Ahlulbait Dalam Penyebaran Islam Di Nusantara (Yogyakarta: Rausyan
Fikr, 2013). On history of Shi‘ah in Indonesia, see Zulkifli, “The Struggle of the Shi’is
in Indonesia” (Ph.D. Thesis, Leiden University, 2009).
Budaya,” in Sejarah & Budaya Syiah Di Asia Tenggara (Yogyakarta: Sekolah Pascasarjana
Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2013), pp. 188-192.
6 In the manuscript, the title of Sulthan is always called Syah. According to this
Syeikh Syamsul Bahri Abdullah al-Asyi. The text was re-written by Said
Abdullah Ibn Saiyid Habib Saifuddin on 1275 H.7 These findings are
published in 1999, when I investigated on the issue of early history of
the development of Islamic law in Indonesia.8
In 2013, I was invited in an international conference on the
presense of Shiah in Southeast Asia. In this meeting I argued that it is a
necessary to clarify on the coming and influence of Shi‘ah and Persia in
Aceh. Then, I expanded the paper which was published in Sejarah &
Budaya Syiah di Asia Tenggara (History and Culture of Shi‘ah in
Southeast Asia). 9 This article which is based on the paper that I
presented in the conference, is to examine some data on the influence
of Persia and Shi‘ah in Aceh. There have been bibliographic study on
the Persian and Shi‘ah studies in Southeast Asia by Majid Danesghar in
2014.10
However, in this article I will study the history of Shi‘ah through
socio-historical and socio-anthropological approaches. As an
Acehnese, I have witnessed that many of Acehnese traditions are still
as partly imported rituals.11 This is because we cannot disagree with the
fact that the impact of Persian tradition12 and its relationship with two
H); al-Malik al-Sulthan Muhammad al-Fath Amîn Syah (342-359 H); al-Malik al-
Sulthan Ibrahim Syah (359-377 H); al-Malik al-Sulthan Muhammad Syah (377-389 H);
al-Malik al-Sulthan Mahmud Syah (389-398 H); al-Malik Sulthan Mansur Syah (398-400
H); al-Malik Sulthan Ahmad Syah ‘Abid (400-406 H); al-Malik Sulthan ‘Abd Allah
Hamid Syah (406-410 H); al-Malik Sulthan Muhammad ‘Ali Syah (410-433 H). See
Bustamam-Ahmad, “Kontribusi Daerah Aceh Terhadap Perkembangan Awal Hukum
Islam Di Indonesia,” p.157-158.
7 A. Hasjmy, “Adakah Kerajaan Islam Perlak Negara Islam Pertama Di Asia
Syiah Di Asia Tenggara, ed. Dicky Sofjan (Yogyakarta: Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas
Gadjah Mada, 2013), pp. 197–212.
10 Majid Daneshgar, “The Study of Persian Shi‘ism in the Malay-Indonesian World: A
Review of Literature from the Nineteenth Century Onwards,” Journal of Shi’a Islamic
Studies VII, no. 2 (2014): pp. 191–229.
11 See generally Kamaruzzaman Bustamam-Ahmad, Acehnologi, 6 vols. (Banda Aceh:
Between Iran and Islam in 17 Century: From Isfahan to Ayutthaya (Singapore: Pustaka
Nasional, 2005). M. Ismail Marcinkowski, “Jejak Kehadiran Persia Di Asia Tenggara,”
in Islam, Iran,& Peradaban: Peran Dan Kontribusi Intelektual Iran Dalam Peradaban Islam
(Yogyakarta: Rausyan Fikr, 2012), pp. 543–60. Imtiyaz Yusuf, “Pengaruh Historis
Persia Pada Islam Di Asia Tenggara Dan Kesatuan Umat Muslim,” in Sejarah & Budaya
Syiah Di Asia Teggara, ed. Dicky Sofjan (Yogyakarta: Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas
Gadjah Mada, 2013), pp. 73–108.
13 Hasjmy, “Adakah Kerajaan Islam Perlak Negara Islam Pertama Di Asia Tenggara,”
pp. 155–57. See also Hilmy Bakar Almascaty, “Relasi Persia Dan Nusantara Pada Awal
Islamisasi -Sebuah Kajian Awal Pengaruh Persia Dalam Politik Aceh” (International
Conference The Contribution of Persia in Nusantara: Past, Present and Future, Banda
Aceh: Media Syariah IAIN Ar-Raniry, 2013), pp. 1–21.
14 See for example Atjeh, Aliran Syi’ah Di Nusantara.
15 See Abdulaziz Abdulhussein Sachedina, The Just Ruler (Al-Sultan Al-Adîl) in Shî’te
Islam: The Comprehensive Authority of the Jurist in Imamite Jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1988).
The Roots
Historically, the discussion of Shi‘ah and Persia in Aceh could be
categorized in five aspects. The first is Shi’ah as ideological power
during the first era of Peureulak, as the oldest of Islamic Kingdoms in
Aceh. The second is the problem of Shi‘ah in Aceh as part of conflict
among Muslim in Middle East. These historical facts have influenced
Acehnese, especially among Sunnis, where the conflict between Sunni
and Shi‘ah had always referred the history of Ahl al-Bayt. The third is
the influence of Persian language which is sometimes seen as part of
the internationalization of Shi‘ism in Southeast Asia. This can be
examined in the history of political languages in Aceh which are
adopted from Persian tradition.17 The fourth is the problem of Shi‘ah
that can be studied in the history of literature or art such as hikayat. It
is argued that many of hikayats in Aceh have been imported from the
16 On this teaching see Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas, The Mysticism of Hamzah
Fansuri (Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press, 1970). Abdul Hadi W.M., Tasawuf
Yang Tertindas: Kajian Hermeneutik Terhadap Karya-Karya Hamzah Fansuri (Jakarta:
Paramadina, 2001).
17 See Azyumardi Azra, Renaisans Islam Asia Tenggara: Sejarah Wacana Dan Kekuasaan
18 See for example L.F. Brakel, Hikayat Muhammad Hanafiyyah, trans. Junaidah Salleh,
Mokgtar Ahmad, and Nor Azmah Shehidan (Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan
Pustaka, 1988). V.I Braginsky, Yang Indah, Berfaedah Dan Kamal: Sejarah Sastra Melayu
Dalam Abad 17-19 (Jakarta: INIS, 1998).
19 See generally Pirouz Mojtahed-Zadeh, “Iran: An Old Civilization and a New Nation
Husain M. Jafri, “Shî’î Islam,” ed. John L. Esposito, The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern
Islamic World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 55.
22 It has generally meaning of “customary practice.” See Michael E. Marmura and John
L. Esposito, “Sunnî Islam,” The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World (Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 139.
23 See for example Devin J. Stewart, Islamic Legal Orthodoxy: Twelver Shiite Response to the
Sunni Legal System (Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press, 1998).
24 Marcinkowski, “Jejak Kehadiran Persia Di Asia Tenggara,” p.545. On Dynast of
Shafawi, see Muhammad Hasyim Assagaf, Lintasan Sejarah Iran: Dari Dinasti Achaemenia
Ke Republik Revolusi Islam, ed. Smith Alhadar (Jakarta: The Cultural Section of Embassy
of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2009). See also Daneshgar, “The Study of Persian
Shi‘ism in the Malay-Indonesian World: A Review of Literature from the Nineteenth
Century Onwards,” pp. 191–92.
Persian Shi‘ah influence extended beyond South Asia into the Malay
Archipelago, yet the exact nature of this influence remains somewhat
unknown.”25
When Islam came to Aceh, Muslim did not declare that they were
Sunni or Shi‘ah. It is unlikely to find any resources about the
declaration of the first Muslim in Aceh claiming that they were the
follower of Shi‘ah or Sunni. But, their arrival of Shi‘ah to Aceh was as
an impact of conflict in Arab Peninsula. When I travelled in the area
where Aboebakar Atjeh claimed as the place of Shi’ah in North Aceh,
I found that many of the tombs were from Persia. It is important to
note that the area of these tombs is near the sea and river in North
Aceh. Taqiuddin Muhammad, a local archeologist told me that he did
not find any fact about the presence of Kingdoms of Peureulak in East
Aceh. 26 However, he found many of tombs that are through his
reading can be claimed from Persian’s name. What struck me is why
we should pay attention to the Kingdom of Peureulak, not the
mausoleums. A local archeologist informed us that the distance of
grave is about 30 km from the Strait of Malacca. However, many of
the tombs in the forest are not preserved by the government.27 This
tells us that many of archeological facts are not being investigated by
scholars. They focus on the nearest place to coastal area.28
Recently, Taqiuddin Muhammad during his archeological research
in North Aceh, has listed many of the graves in North Aceh which are
seen as impact of the coming of Persian to Samudra Pasai: First, Ibn
Khaddajih in Matang Ulim, Samudera, North Aceh. It is found the
date of his death was on 681/1283. The word of Khaddajih is from
Persian which means as teacher. This date is older than the grave of
Sultan al-Malik al-Shalih, dated 696/1297. 29 Second, according to
25 Daneshgar, “The Study of Persian Shi‘ism in the Malay-Indonesian World: A Review
of Literature from the Nineteenth Century Onwards,” p. 192.
26 See also Hasan Muarif Ambary, “Sejarah Masuknya Islam Di Negeri Perlak Ditinjau
Samudrai Pasai,” Media Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial XV, no. 1 (2013),
pp. 31–41.
29 Ibid., p. 37.
30 Ibid.
31 Ibid., p. 38.
32 Ibid. On dicussion of Persian poet in the tomb, see Daneshgar, “The Study of
Pasai,” p. 39.
34 Ibid.
35 See also Muhammad Gade Ismail, Pasai Dalam Perjalanan Sejarah: Abad Ke-13 Sampai
Awal Abad Ke-16 (Jakarta: Proyek Inventarisasi dan Dokumentasi Sejarah Nasional,
1993). Ghozali, Safwan, and Syarif, Peran Ahlulbait Dalam Penyebaran Islam Di Nusantara.
36 See for example Daniel Perret, “Aceh As a Field for Ancient History” (First
International Conference on Aceh and Indian Ocean Studies, Banda Aceh: Asia
Research Institute, 2007).
not been claimed as the influence of Shi’ah, but ‘Ali bin Abi Thalib. 37
At the same time, the title of Sulthân al-Adîl in one of gold coin as the
oldest currency in Nusantara during era of Sultan Muhamad Malik al-
Zahir (1297-1326) was not seen as part Shi’ah’s concept on Just Ruler,
but it was taken from the Kitab Taj al-Salâtîn.38 The translator of this
kitab was Bukhari al-Jauhari in 1603 during the era of Kerajaan Aceh
Darussalam.39 In fact, the discussion of sultan al-‘adîl is one of Shi’ah’s
teaching on leadership such as concept of walaya. In doctrine of Shi’ah,
sultan al-‘adîl “was responsible for tadbîr al-anâm - that is, managing the
affairs of humanity. One of the fundamental functions of the sultan is
to implement the Islamic ideology based on the principle “enjoining
good and prohibiting evil” in Muslim society.”40 In Aceh, the title was
used not only in Samudera Pasai, but also Aceh Darussalam, from
Sultan ‘Ali Mughayat Syah (1514-1530-1530) until Sultan Ri’ayat Syah
(1589-1604).41 During the Pasai era, it is reported that a century later
that coinage came to be used in international trade throughout the
archipelago.42
In terms of the literature, as mentioned above, there has been
Persian spirit in some Acehnese literatures. Again, scholars would not
argue the influence of Shi’ah in this matter. Through Aceh era (1500-
1600), many Persian adab-works were translated or adapted into Malay
language.43 This can be found, for example, in the text of Tâj al-Salâtin,
37 See Ibrahim Alfian, “Samudra Pasai Dan Melaka Sebagai Bandar-Bandar Niaga Dan
Pusat Agama Dan Kebudayaan Di Sekitar Selat Melaka,” in Wajah Aceh Dalam Lintasan
Sejarah, by Ibrahim Alfian, ed. M. Hasan Basry (Banda Aceh: Pusat Dokuementasi dan
Informasi Aceh, 1999), p. 17.
38 On Taj al-Salatin, see Hussain Khalid, ed., Taj Us-Salatin (Kuala Lumpur: Dewan
Sains Malaysia Press, 2009), p. 82. On on the influence of Persian to Malay literature,
see Abdul Hadi W.M., “Jejak Persia Dalam Sejarah Kebudayaan Dan Sastra Melayu,”
in Islam, Iran, & Peradaban: Peran Dan Kontribusi Intelektual Iran Dalam Peradaban Islam
(Yogyakarta: Rausyan Fikr, 2012), pp. 447–72.
44 Harun, Bustan Al-Salatin: A Malay Mirror for Rulers, p. 82. Braginsky, Yang Indah,
Berfaedah Dan Kamal: Sejarah Sastra Melayu Dalam Abad 17-19, pp. 322–35.
45 Harun, Bustan Al-Salatin: A Malay Mirror for Rulers, p. 105.
46 Abdul Hadi W.M., “Jejak Persia Dalam Sastra Melayu,” Media Syariah: Jurnal Hukum
47 Mohamad Nasrin bin Mohamad Nasir, “Pengaruh Persia Dalam Mistisisme Hamzah
Fansuri,” in Islam, Iran, & Peradaban: Peran Dan Kontribusi Intelektual Iran Dalam
Peradaban Islam (Yogyakarta: Rausyan Fikr, 2012), pp. 357–78.
48 On the controversy of Wahdat al-Wujud, see Azyumardi Azra, “Kontroversi Dan
51 Almascaty, “Relasi Persia Dan Nusantara Pada Awal Islamisasi -Sebuah Kajian Awal
Acehnese Society” (Ph.D. Thesis, Temple University, 1995). Yusny Saby, “The Ulama
in Aceh: A Brief Historical Survey,” Studia Islamika 8, no. 1 (2001), pp. 1–54.
Kamaruzzaman Bustamam-Ahmad, “Pesantren Sebagai Pusat Peradaban Muslim:
Pengalaman Indonesia Untuk Asia Tenggara,” Edukasi 8, no. 2 (2010), pp. 3939–66.
Asian.53 The meetings of many traditions can be found near the coastal
areas.
Cultural Landscapes
It seems that the influence of Persian tradition is important in the
history of religious intellectual in Aceh. However, it is hard to conclude
that the Persians were Shi’ism, because the Acehnese had known
Persian intellectual tradition before the controversy of Shi‘ism in
Nusantara. 54 It is believed that the word “Aceh” is coming from
Achaemenia in the era of King of Darius (521-486 BC). 55 Some
Acehnese believe that the origin of Acehnese people were from the
Achaemenia people.56 Regarding the Achaemenian, it is said that “They
had created “world empire” encompassing of the oldest and most
honored kingdoms and peoples of the ancient Near East.” 57 In
addition, the Achaemenian along with Sasanian influenced Islamic or
Arabic civilization.58
It is interesting to note about the identity of Achaemenian. Local
scholars have argued on the impact of Achaemenian era in Nusantara.
There is a song by a local artist (Rafly Kande) on the honour of King
Darius as part of Acehnese dignity. The lyrics are as follow:
Beek tabeoh kada wangsa meutuwah; turounan meugah meuri-ri wangsa;
khujja ngoen majja lakap geupajah; turoenan meugah darius raja.59
2012).
55 On the history of Achaemenia, see Assagaf, Lintasan Sejarah Iran: Dari Dinasti
2000).
57 John P. McKay, Benneth D. Hill, and John Buckler, A History of World Societies
Muslims: Diasporas of the Northern Passage of the Straits of Malacca (Penang: Straits G.T.,
2009). Nordin Hussin, Trade and Society in the Straits of Melaka: Dutch Melaka and English
Penang, 1780-1830 (Singapore: NUS Press, 2007).
63 Anthony Reid, The Contest for North Sumatra: Atjeh, the Netherlands and Britain 1858-
1898 (Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1969). Ibrahim Alfian, “Aceh and the
Holy War (Prang Sabil),” in Verandah of Violence: The Background to the Aceh Problem
(Singapore: Singapore University Press, 2006), pp. 109–20. Ibrahim Alfian, Perang Di
Jalan Allah: Perang Aceh, 1873-1912 (Jakarta: Sinar Harapan, 1987).
destruction of Kingdoms by the Dutch, but also the custom which was
changed by Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje.64
What I would like to show is that the Acehnese culture has been in
catastrophic situation. Acehnese don’t have any single Kings or even
Kingdoms anymore. After the colonial period, the Acehnese were also
in a conflict between ‘ulama and ulee balang which is seen social
revolution. Soon after that, the Acehnese were in conflict with central
government. Thus, the roots and cultural production have become
unclear. The Acehnese society has attached their religious belief only
to the ‘ulama from dayah. At the same time, the people still see that
their endatu tradition could give spirit of identity for them. In this
situation, the people are likely to tailor themselves to what endatu have
done without asking their originality.
Given this process, it is not mistaken when Acehnese scholar who
tried to investigate the root of culture would meet “should not be…”
i.e. Shi‘ah. The Acehnese did not see Shi‘ah as “problem” as we might
found in Islamic history65 and what has been going on in the Middle
East.66 The Acehnese are in the position of seeking their root of endatu
tradition. Even there is a declaration that there were Shi‘ah’s elements
in their cultural life, the people would not visit the holy places in Iran.
The Acehnese would not publish Shi‘ah’s book as we found in Java. In
this context, the Acehnese understand Shi’ah for culture only, not for
political consciousness or even for political ideology. During the visit
of Iranian Ambassador to Aceh, an Acehnese student still asked: can
Sunni and Shi‘ah be an umbrella of the ummah. This situation has led to
efforts of intellectuality in Aceh without being entrapped in conflict
between Sunni and Shi‘ah. Some Acehnese, especially in urban area,
still see Shi‘ah as the enemy of Sunni. However, when they return to
64 Harry J Benda, “Christian Snouck Hurgronje and the Foundations of Dutch Islamic
Policy in Indonesia,” The Journal of Modern History 30, no. 4 (1958), pp. 338–47.
65 Marshall G.S. Hodgson, The Venture of Islam, 3 vols. (Chicago: The University of
University of New York Press, 1984). Said Amir Arjomand, “A Victory for the
Pragmatists: The Islamic Fundamentalist Reaction in Iran,” in Islamic Fundamentalisms
and the Gulf Crisis, ed. James Piscatori (Chicago: The American Academy of Arts and
Science, 1991). Said Amir Arjomand, “Iran’s Islamic Revolution in Comparative
Perspective,” World Politics 38, no. 3 (1986), pp. 383–414. John L. Esposito, Political
Islam: Revolution, Radicalism, or Reform? (Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc., 1997).
Conclusion
This study has shown the impact of Shi‘ah in Aceh. However, it is
necessary to do more studies on Shi‘ah in the province, as historically
and anthropologically, might be connected with Persian traditions. As
we have examined, the element of Shi‘ah can be found not only in the
history of Islamic Kingdoms in Aceh, but also in many of cultural
aspects. In addition, the Acehnese still see that Shi‘ah and Persian have
References
Marmura, Michael E., and John L. Esposito. “Sunnî Islam.” The Oxford
Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1995.
Moaddel, Mansoor. “Ideology as Episodic Discourse: The Case of the
Iranian Revolution.” American Sociological Review 57, no. 3 (1992):
353–79.
Mohamad Nasir, Mohamad Nasrin bin. “Pengaruh Persia Dalam
Mistisisme Hamzah Fansuri.” In Islam, Iran, & Peradaban: Peran
Dan Kontribusi Intelektual Iran Dalam Peradaban Islam, 357–78.
Yogyakarta: Rausyan Fikr, 2012.
Mojtahed-Zadeh, Pirouz. “Iran: An Old Civilization and a New Nation
State.” Focus on Geography 49, no. 4 (2007): 20–32.
Muhammad, Taqiuddin. Daulah Shalihiyah Di Sumatera: Ke Arah
Penyusunan Kerangka Baru Historiografi Samudra Pasai.
Lhokseumawe: Center for Information of Samudra Pasai
Heritage, 2011.
———. “Jejak Kebudayaan Persia Di Kawasan Tinggalan Sejarah
Samudra Pasai,” 1–12. Banda Aceh: Media Syariah IAIN Ar-
Raniry, 2013.
———. “Jejak Kebudayaan Persia Di Kawasan Tinggalan Sejarah
Samudrai Pasai.” Media Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata
Sosial XV, no. 1 (2013): 31–41.
P. McKay, John, Benneth D. Hill, and John Buckler. A History of World
Societies. Boston: Houghton Miffin Company, 1984.
Perret, Daniel. “Aceh As a Field for Ancient History.” Banda Aceh:
Asia Research Institute, 2007.
Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. “Tinjauan Kritis Atas Sejarah Fiqh: Dari Fiqh
Tabi’in Hingga Madzhab Liberalisme.” In Kontekstualisasi Doktrin
Islam Dalam Sejarah, edited by Budhy Munawar-Rachman, 251–
310. Jakarta: Paramadina, 1995.
Reid, Anthony. The Contest for North Sumatra: Atjeh, the Netherlands and
Britain 1858-1898. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press,
1969.
Saby, Yusny. “Islam and Social Change: The Role of the Ulama’ in
Acehnese Society.” Ph.D. Thesis, Temple University, 1995.