Adaptive Innate Immunity Responsive-Mode Prophylaxis in The Mealworm Beetle Tenebrio Molitor
Adaptive Innate Immunity Responsive-Mode Prophylaxis in The Mealworm Beetle Tenebrio Molitor
Adaptive Innate Immunity Responsive-Mode Prophylaxis in The Mealworm Beetle Tenebrio Molitor
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2003 270, doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2511, published 7 December 2003
Email alerting service Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the top
right-hand corner of the article or click here
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (2003) 270, 2475–2480 2475 2003 The Royal Society
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2003.2511
Downloaded from rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org on October 15, 2014
peptides by the fat body. These peptides are secreted into a broad range of microbial agents (Gillespie et al. 1997). We
the haemolymph (Hoffmann et al. 1996). These anti- therefore expected the antimicrobial response to LPS challenge
microbial pathways are induced within the hour following to be efficient against M. anisopliae.
the challenge and the synthesis of antimicrobial peptides Preparation of M. anisopliae spores and assays was performed
can persist for many days post-challenge (Söderhäll 1982; as described by Goettel & Inglis (1997). Fungus was cultured
Ratcliffe et al. 1985; Kato et al. 1994; Lemaı̂tre et al. on potato dextrose agar plates and the dose was prepared by
1996). Moreover, some of these insect antimicrobial scraping fungal spores into 0.05% Triton X-100 solution. The
responses are induced in the absence of microbial antigens spore concentration was determined by counting spores using a
by a trauma alone, for example during wounding haemocytometer with a compound microscope (Leitz Diaplan)
(Lemaı̂tre et al. 1997), presumably as a prophylactic and was then adjusted to 2 × 106 spores ml⫺1 of Triton X-100
response. solution for inoculation. Inoculates were never older than 24 h
In this study, we mimicked a primary immune insult by and were stored at 4 °C when not used.
experimentally challenging larvae of the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor larvae were exposed to the fungus by dipping
Tenebrio molitor, with LPS. The larvae were then exposed them in 1 ml of spore solution for 5 s. Control larvae were
to early or late infection with spores of the entomopathog- dipped in 0.05% Triton X-100 solution without fungal spores.
enic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae to test for the survival Larvae were then allowed to crawl over tissue paper to remove
costs and benefits of producing a long-lasting prophylactic excess moisture and placed back in their box. Mortality was
immune response. If the primary insult provides long- scored over 50 days after fungal inoculation.
lasting protection, we expected to observe a survival bene-
fit to the fungal infection in previously challenged larvae. (d ) Immune parameters
By contrast, because mounting an immune response is Six larvae were sampled at random from each immune treat-
costly (Moret & Schmid-Hempel 2000) we expected to ment at day 4 and day 7 after the pre-challenge but prior to the
see a survival cost in previously challenged larvae that were treatment exposure to fungal spores to test for the antibacterial
not exposed to fungal infection. and the phenoloxidase (PO) activity in their haemolymph. Each
larva was chilled on ice for 10 min and the pleural membrane
between the second and the third abdominal segments was
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
punctured with a sterile hypodermic needle. The droplet of
(a) Mealworm cultures haemolymph that came out of the wound was collected into a
The beetle larvae used in this study were taken at random sterile, pre-chilled glass capillary. For each insect, 5 µl of haemo-
from a stock culture maintained at the University of Sheffield. lymph were collected and flushed into a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge
Nine cultures, each containing 75 to 80 larvae at the same devel- tube containing 50 µl of cold sodium cacodilate/CaCl2 buffer
opmental stage (10 to 15 mm in length), were set up for the (0.01 M Na-Cac, 0.005 M CaCl2, pH 6.5). A 15 µl subsample
experiment. Cultures were fed ad libitum and kept at 28 ± 1 °C was kept in a 0.5 ml microcentrifuge tube and stored at –80 °C
for the duration of the experiment. until later examination for antibacterial activity using a zone-of-
inhibition test. The methods for this test were as described in
(b) Immune treatments Moret & Schmid-Hempel (2000) except that the assay was per-
Experimental cultures were assigned to one of the three treat- formed using haemolymph diluted 12 times with sodium
ments: ‘naive’, ‘Ringer’ and ‘LPS’. Larvae in the ‘naive’ group cacodilate/CaCl2 buffer. The remaining haemolymph solution
were chilled on ice prior to inclusion in the experiment. Larvae was diluted with 30 µl of cold sodium cacodilate/CaCl2 buffer
in the ‘Ringer’ group received a single injection of 5 µl of saline and immediately stored at –80 °C for later measurement of PO
solution (Ringer solution) after being chilled on ice. Larvae in activity. PO activity was assayed by thawing samples of frozen
the ‘LPS’ group received a 0.5 mg ml⫺1 dose of LPS (Sigma: haemolymph solution (dilution 1 in 20; haemolymph/
L8274) in 5 µl Ringer solution after being chilled on ice. LPS sodium cacodilate/CaCl2 buffer) on ice and then adding 20 µl
is the non-pathogenic, non-living surface molecule derived from to a microplate well containing 140 µl of distilled water, 20 µl
E. coli. It is highly immunogenic (Söderhäll 1982; Ratcliffe et al. of phosphate buffer saline (PBS: 8.74 g NaCl; 1.78 g Na2HPO4,
1985; Jomori et al. 1990) and elicits the production of antimicro- 2H2O; 1000 ml distilled water; pH. 6.5) and 20 µl of l-DOPA
bial peptides over many hours (Söderhäll 1982; Ratcliffe et al. solution (4 mg ml⫺1 of distilled water). The reaction was
1985; Kato et al. 1994; Lemaı̂tre et al. 1996). All injections were allowed to proceed at 30 °C in a microplate reader (Versamax,
made through the pleural membrane between the second and Molecular Devices) for 40 min. Readings were taken every 10 s
the third abdominal segments, using sterilized glass capillaries at 490 nm and analysed using SoftMax Pro 4.0 software
that had been pulled out to a fine point. (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Enzyme activity was mea-
sured as the slope (Vmax value) of the reaction curve during the
(c) Fungal infection linear phase of the reaction (Barnes & Siva-Jothy 2000; Plaistow
Larvae of each immune treatment were then assigned to one et al. 2003).
of the three infection treatments with the entomopathogenic
fungus M. anisopliae: ‘control’ (larvae were not exposed to the (e) Statistics
fungi), ‘early’ infection (larvae were exposed to the fungi 4 days Antibacterial and PO activities were analysed using a multi-
post-challenge) and ‘late’ infection (larvae were exposed to the variate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with pre-challenges and
fungi 7 days post-challenge). The antimicrobial pathway time post-injection as factors. Antibacterial activity was log
induced by the recognition of LPS in insects is different from transformed to homogenize the variance.
the one that would be induced through the recognition of fungi We used a Cox regression with a time-dependent covariate to
(Gottar et al. 2002; Tzou et al. 2002). However, the resulting analyse the differences in survival rates with respect to fungal
antimicrobial peptides that are produced work efficiently against and pre-challenge treatments. This analysis allows the
4. DISCUSSION
3. RESULTS
We demonstrated that the immune response following
(a) Antibacterial and PO activities pre-challenge provides resistance against subsequent
MANOVA showed a significant effect of the pre-chal- pathogen insults. LPS-treated T. molitor larvae showed
lenges on the measured immune parameters (these better survival to fungal infection 4 or 7 days after pre-
response variables are zone of inhibition and PO activity challenge (table 1; figure 2b,c). This enhanced resistance
(figure 1; Pillai’s trace: F 4,60 = 9.14, p ⬍ 0.001)). By con- to infection was correlated with elevated antimicrobial
trast, neither time post-injection nor its interaction with activity in the haemolymph of LPS-treated larvae for the
pre-challenge treatments affected the measured immune period of the fungal inoculations (figure 1a). By contrast,
parameters (time post-injection: F 2,29 = 0.34, p = 0.712; PO activity of LPS-treated larvae was lowest when com-
Table 1. Results of the time-dependent Cox regression model. The table contains the relevant terms identified by a backward
stepwise procedure.
(The full model is: survival, S(t) = S0(t)p, where p = exp[b(pre-challenges) ⫹ b(infections) ⫹ b(infections × pre-challenges) ⫹
(t/1)(b(T × pre-challenges) ⫹ b(T × infections) ⫹ b(T × infections × pre-challenges)].)
a
‘Ringer’: (5 µl); ‘LPS’: (5 µl, 0.5 mg ml⫺1); ‘infection (4)’: exposure to fungal inoculums (2.106) at day 4 post immune challenge;
‘infection (7)’: exposure to fungal inoculums (2.106) at day 7 post immune challenge; ‘T’: time covariate (in days).
b
b, regression coefficient of overall survival function for variable.
c
Standard error of regression coefficient.
d
Wald statistic for variable. Values p ⭐ 0.05 are given in bold.
e
Significance level for Wald statistic.
f
Odds ratio of survival for variable relative to control (= exp(b)).
Huang, C. C. & Song, Y. L. 1999 Maternal transmission of Moret, Y. & Schmid-Hempel, P. 2001 Immune defence in
immunity to white spot syndrome associated virus (WSSV) bumble-bee offspring. Nature 414, 506.
in shrimp (Penaeus monodon). Dev. Comp. Immunol. 23, Norusis, M. J. & SPSS Inc. 1989 SPSS advanced statistic user’s
545–552. guide. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
Hughes, A. L. 1998 Protein phylogenies provide evidence of a Plaistow, S., Outreman, Y., Moret, Y. & Rigaud, T. 2003 Vari-
radical discontinuity between arthropod and vertebrate ation in the risk of being wounded: an overlooked factor in
immune systems. Immunogenetics 47, 283–296. studies of invertebrate immune function. Ecol. Lett. 6,
Jomori, T., Kubo, T. & Natori, S. 1990 Purification and 489–494.
characterization of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein from Ratcliffe, N. A., Rowley, A. F., Fitzgerald, S. W. & Rhodes,
hemolymph of American cockroach Periplaneta americana. C. P. 1985 Invertebrate immunity: basic concepts and recent
Eur. J. Biochem. 190, 201–206. advances. Int. Rev. Cytol. 97, 183–350.
Kato, Y., Motoi, Y., Taniai, K., Kadono-Okuda, K., Hiram- Reeson, A. F., Wilson, K., Gunn, A., Hails, R. S. & Goulson,
atsu, M. & Yamakawa, M. 1994 Clearance of lipopolysac- D. 1998 Baculovirus resistance in the noctuid Spodoptera
charide in hemolymph of Bombyx mori: its role in the exempta is phenotypically plastic and responds to population
termination of cecropin mRNA induction. Insect Biochem. density. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1787–1791. (DOI
Molec. Biol. 24, 539–545. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0503.)
Klimovich, V. B. 2000 Actual problems of evolutionary immu- Rinkevich, B. 1999 Invertebrates versus vertebrates innate
nology. J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol. 38, 562–574. immunity: in the light of evolution. Scand. J. Immunol. 50,
Lemaı̂tre, B., Nicolas, E., Michaut, L., Reichhart, J.-M. & 456–460.
Hoffman, J. A. 1996 The dorsoventral regulatory gene cas- Schmid-Hempel, P. 1998 Parasites in social insects. Monograph
sette spaezle/toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal in behavior and ecology. Princeton University Press.
response in Drosophila adults. Cell 88, 973–983. Söderhäll, K. 1982 Prophenoloxidase activating system and
Lemaı̂tre, B., Reichart, J. M. & Hoffmann, J. A. 1997 Droso- melanization: a recognition mechanism of arthropods? A
phila host defence: differential induction of antimicrobial review. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 6, 601–611.
genes after infection by various classes of microorganisms. Söderhäll, K. & Cerenius, L. 1998 Role of the prophenoloxi-
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 14 614–14 619. dase-activating system in invertebrate immunity. Curr. Opin.
Little, T. J., O’Connor, B., Colegrave, N., Waat, K. & Read, Immunol. 10, 23–28.
A. F. 2003 Maternal transfer of strain-specific immunity in Sugumaran, M., Nellaiappan, K. & Valivittan, K. 2000 A new
an invertebrate. Curr. Biol. 13, 489–492. mechanism for the control of phenoloxidase activity: inhi-
Lui, K. J. 2000 Confidence intervals of the simple difference bition and complex formation with quinone isomerase. Arch.
between the proportions of a primary infection and a second- Biochem. Biophys. 379, 252–260.
ary infection, given the primary infection. Biometrical J. 42, Tzou, P., De Gregorio, E. & Lemaı̂tre, B. 2002 How Droso-
59–69. phila combats microbial infection: a model to study innate
Medzhitov, R. & Janeway, C. A. 1998 An ancient system of immunity and host–pathogen interactions. Curr. Opin.
host defense. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10, 12–15. Microbiol. 5, 102–110.
Moret, Y. & Schmid-Hempel, P. 2000 Survival for immunity: Wilson, K., Cotter, S. C., Reeson, A. F. & Pell, J. K. 2001
the price of immune system activation for bumble-bee work- Melanism and disease resistance in insects. Ecol. Lett. 4,
ers. Science 290, 1166–1168. 637–649.