Epistemology and Ontology
Epistemology and Ontology
Epistemology and Ontology
The first activity you will do during the session. The remaining three are designed for you
to do over the next few weeks to support the session and the slides (with voice over).
This is the first week of research methods and one of the things that is useful to do is think
about who you are and then who you are or could be as a researcher. This is also a good
way to help you get to know each other and may make you realise other people have similar
interests, method preferences, influences, biases etc. As such, this initial activity is designed
to help you think about you and then also get to know others in the group. This will be done
in three parts:
Part 1:
Who we are, what we think, and our role in the world can impact how we approach
research. Within this module you will learn about lots of different methods, be given
dissertation ideas and opportunities to work on real projects. You could do something that
fits in with your job, interests you, fits where you want to go after your degree, or helps you
work in a certain area. Sometimes though it is also good to go outside of your comfort zone,
but to do that we need to know our comfort zone. As such think about the following 10
questions and give your gut answer (don’t spend too long on each):
Part 2:
As you can see, I have picked out 10 questions I think are important to think about or to
know to help you as you go through this module. It may make you realise your biases,
preferences, where you need/want to learn more, or where you may feel more
comfortable. It may also help you think about the skills sessions that go with the module,
and where you may need more help.
One of the great things about this course is the diversity of people in terms of their
background, their upbringing, their homes, and their ambitions going forward. To help us to
start and benefit from the importance of this diversity, in pairs, think of one more question
you think we should ask the rest of the group that will help us going forward with the
module and skills sessions.
Feed this back to the group and then you can all answer this.
Part 3:
If you would like, you can feed some of this back to the group in terms of your answers or
what it made you think about or realised, things that you perhaps hadn’t thought of before.
If there is not time to feedback in the class, then please feedback using the discussion
sections on Blackboard as this will allow you to carry on the conversation.
Activity 2:
Moving in to look at some initial important terms in research, but building on your answers
to activity one: who we are and how we view things can have a great deal of impact on how
we approach and carry out research. It can also impact what we think of research and what
we are more inclined to choose as methods, how we critique papers and what we think is
valid.
As such, at the start of this module it is important to think about how you view things. To
help us do this we will use the diagram below that illustrates how some of the key terms
within research are all linked.
Initially, have a think about four questions and try to sum up in one sentence your answer to
them:
What is reality? (Ontology) – e.g. what is there, so does the chair we are sat on exist?
How do you know something? (Epistemology) e.g. how do we know that the chair
we are sat on exists
What do you think has impacted on your initial two answers?
How do you think this could impact your research and public
health/PhD/radiography work?
Once you have written your sentence for each then explain this to others using the
discussion boards on Blackboard.
Try to ensure that you stick to one sentence, think if you were in an elevator with someone
you have only this length of time to answer – so around 1-minute in total. Being succinct
about your view can help make sure it is clear.
Activity 3:
To support their class, two academics created a quiz, which can help you think about your
epistemology. You can read about the design in the following paper - Strickland, B. and
Lawrence, E. (2015), What's your epistemology?: Quiz design as a pedagogical tool in library
& information science doctoral education. Proc. Assoc. Info. Sci. Tech., 52: 1-3.
doi:10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010080
https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010080
Activity 4:
Research paradigms, ontology and epistemology are difficult concepts that can often be
confusing and have a number of other equally possibly confusing terms associated with
them.
When I think about myself as a researcher, I am a pragmatist – I often use mixed methods,
and I have an inclination towards making sure people get to tell their story, be this very
young children or adults.
Alex on the other hand is a positivist: she has a very quantitative background (mathematics
and epidemiology), and as such likes has a deductive thought process.
We have learnt this over many years, far too much reading and far too much talking, as well
as a lot of different research activities. It has also taken a lot of head scratching to get to the
stage we can say what type of researcher we are in fewer than three lines.
For this last activity I want you to start doing some research, but not with people, online to
find resources to help your classmates. There are millions of videos, blogs, articles, books
and journals around paradigms, ontology and epistemology. I have given you some below,
and some through the slides for the session.
For this activity I want us to start to create a resource directory to help each other with
regards these concepts and also research methods. As such I would like you to:
1. Carry out a search for a resource that is linked to either – paradigms, ontology,
epistemology or research methods – make sure this is NOT one that has been
provided by the Public Health Team.
2. Critique the resource you have found – do we know the source, how trustworthy is
it, what type of evidence is it, what format is it etc. (later on in this module we will
learn about hierarchies of evidence and what is suitable to use, but for this it can be
any type – as we will draw on the types you find later on in the module).
3. Post what you have found on the discussion board – with it provide a brief (50
words), which outlines what it is, what it links to and your critique
4. Over the next few weeks see what the others in the group have posted and
comment your thoughts on these.
Useful links:
Weed, D.L. (1999) Towards a philosophy of public health. Journal of Epidemiol Community
Health, 53. Pp. 99–104 - https://jech.bmj.com/content/jech/53/2/99.full.pdf
Crotty, M., (1998). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the
Research Process.
Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S., 1994. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook
of qualitative research, 2(163-194), p.105.