Step Template - Portfoilio
Step Template - Portfoilio
Step Template - Portfoilio
Victoria Anaya
National or State Academic Content Standards: Arizona State Standards- 4.NBT.B.4 Fluently
Learning Goal:
First, the goal is to start subtracting with two-digit numbers to get an understanding of
borrowing from the tens place-value. Next, the goal will be to use strategies, such as Proof
Drawing, to subtract and start showing three-digit whole numbers to subtract. Then, students
have the day to work individually to use their skills to subtract three, four, and five-digit whole
numbers. After that, the standard algorithm to subtract numbers will be used by regrouping with
virtual manipulatives, which I am still trying to find. Finally, a mini lesson quiz will be given on
NearPod to determine if more time is necessary with the class or if it is a small group that needs
additional help.
whole numbers. While being virtual, there are a ton of fun and educational math games for
students. I have found a puzzle game that students can play, but it is important to find out prior to
giving the link, if students’ school tablet will allow them to access the site.
https://www.mathplayground.com/puzzle_pics_subtraction_facts_to_20.html
-EDITED: Students will submit each day a completed page from their Wonders math book. On
Wednesday, I will provide a subtraction worksheet ranging from one’s place-value to hundred-
thousand’s place-value. I will be able to see their work shown and be able to determine what area
miscounting. We will also discuss as a whole class different ways we can subtract or show our
work.
How will they prove their newly learned knowledge to you and how will you know for sure that they “got it”? For
instance, will they engage in a whole class discussion? Submit a complete and accurate worksheet?
Measurable Objectives:
Students will be able to use and demonstrate how to subtract multi-digit whole numbers
Students will be able to fluently identify the standard algorithm for subtraction.
Students will be able to explain the meaning of regrouping and assess answers by adding
the differences.
Pre-assessment:
wanted advice on how to make it easy for students while being online. Technology has been
stressful for them and chaotic for us teaching. Also, with subtraction, it is a difficult concept for
students to comprehend and pre-assessments are so important for data. It helps determine what to
review before starting the topic. For example, if all students are understanding how to borrow,
then it can be reviewed, and we can move onto the lesson. However, if just one student is not
sure about borrowing, then I would add details to my lesson to explain and give examples of
borrowing. For my pre-assessment, I will be making a Kahoot. The students played once while
being online and they loved it, the best part was they were all participating! It will be played the
1. What does this word mean Take Away? A. Subtract, B. Minus, C. Increase, D. Remove).
3. What do you think Regrouping means? (A. the process of making groups, B. multiply, C.
6. When subtracting…(A. the smaller number goes on top, B. it doesn’t matter, C. the larger
7. If I had $15 Sevilla bucks and bought $5 dollars’ worth of prizes, how much money do I have
left? (A. $11 Sevilla bucks, B. $10 Sevilla bucks, C. $9 Sevilla bucks, D. $20 Sevilla bucks).
9. I know I need to subtract when I see…(A. minus (-), B. plus (+), C. take away, D. deduct).
10. Ms. Layne has 16 missing assignments, but she completed 8 of them, how many does she
Pre-Assessment Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ knowledge on the topic,
collect and analyze the pre-assessment data to determine if you will need to modify the standards,
learning goal, or measurable objectives that will be addressed during instruction.
Number of Students
Highly Proficient (90%-100%)
3
Proficient
(80%-89%) 4
Partially Proficient
2
(70%-79%)
Minimally Proficient
(69% and below) 7
Post-Assessment – Copy and paste the post-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’ knowledge
of the topic after implementing the unit lessons. The post-assessment can be the same as the pre-
assessment, a modified version, or something comparable that measures the same concepts. Include the
scoring criteria used to determine whether students are Highly Proficient, Proficient, Partially Proficient,
Minimally Proficient when it comes to meeting the learning goal and measurable objectives.
My plan for the post-assessment was for students to do page 89 from their math books
individually. This allowed me to see their work, and there are True or False questions which is
great for students to approach each statement slowly and discover the outcome of the product. At
the end of the page we discussed the True or False statements and students explained to me their
reasoning for the answer; we did not discuss the results until students had their assignment turned
in. Based on the answers from students’ math book, I measured 8 students as Highly Proficient, 5
who became Proficient, 7 students that are Partially Proficient, and 3 who are Minimally
Proficient. As for the other four students’, I cannot gather any data on them due to no work being
turned in, and low to zero communication between my mentor teacher and I with the student and
parent.
Unit/Subject: Subtraction/Math
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
National/State Learning Arizona State Arizona State Arizona State Arizona State Arizona State
Standards Standards- Standards- Standards- Standards- Standards-
List specific grade-level 4.NBT.B.4 Fluently 4.NBT.B.4 Fluently 4.NBT.B.4 Fluently 4.NBT.B.4 Fluently 4.NBT.B.4 Fluently
standards that are the focus
of the lesson being presented.
add and subtract add and subtract add and subtract add and subtract add and subtract
multi-digit whole multi-digit whole multi-digit whole multi-digit whole multi-digit whole
numbers using a numbers using a numbers using a numbers using a numbers using a
standard algorithm. standard algorithm. standard algorithm. standard algorithm. standard algorithm.
Specific Learning Students will be able Students will be able Students will be able Students will be able Students will be able
Target(s)/Objectives to use and to comprehend to fluently identify to explain the to subtract 3-5-digit
Based on state standards, demonstrate how to synonyms for the the standard meaning of numbers and check
identify what is intended to be
measured in learning.
subtract multi-digit word subtract and be algorithm for regrouping and their work by using
whole numbers with able to borrow from subtraction. assess answers by the addition skills
place-value another place-value at 75%. adding the to100% accuracy.
strategies at 55%. at 60%. differences at 85%.
Academic Language Reviewing: Algorithm Algorithm Algorithm Algorithm
General academic vocabulary Place Value Borrow Borrow Borrow Borrow
and content-specific
Standard Form Regrouping Regrouping Regrouping Regrouping
vocabulary included in the
unit. Expanded Form Difference Difference Difference Difference
Word Form
Subtract
Unit Resources, Tablet Tablet Tablet Tablet Tablet
Materials, Equipment, Paper Paper Paper Paper Paper
and Technology Pencil Pencil Pencil Pencil Pencil
List all resources, materials,
Math Book Math Book Math Book Math Book Math Book
equipment, and technology to
be used in the unit.
Early finishers: i-
Ready math games,
or Imagine Learning
once i-Ready
minutes are
complete.
Assessment of Content
Multiple Means of We will discuss the Students will Students must show As an Exit Ticket On page 84 #9,
Expression comparison of observe how to their work and have from their math students will solve
Formative and summative subtracting same complete a an explanation book page 78, the subtraction
assessments used to monitor
student progress and modify
place values, and subtraction problem, written in their math students will have to problem, then
instruction. regrouping. If walk me through book on page 74. find the missing explain over video
For the first two days, I mainly wanted to review subtracting with the class because for
the pre-assessment, students were not comprehending subtraction or borrowing. For the students’
that were understanding what we were doing, I grouped them together so we can talk about
subtraction and I wanted to see how far in place-values they could comprehend with subtracting.
For the third day, students had a better idea of subtracting; they knew when they had to borrow,
and I kept asking them “What place-value are we borrowing from?” and they knew exactly
where to borrow from. Next, I wanted to introduce how students’ can check their work. They
closest whole numbers, then when they subtract the actual problem, it will be near the actual
answer. For example, 2,355-1,615=740 but when we estimate it will look like 2,400-1,600=800.
However, another way to check our work is getting the lowest number from the subtraction
problem and the answer and add them together; 1,615+740=2,355. For the last day, we worked
on NearPod that went along with the math book, and this is where students showed more of
checking their work. On the third and fourth day, we were supposed to be on NearPod, but it was
under maintenance, so I transferred all the questions I had ready onto Whiteboard.fi. I think this
was a better outcome for students and I because they were able to write out the problem, and I
After the pre-assessment, it helped me identify and prepare where students were going
wrong with subtracting, and better myself at explaining. The process of this unit plan being
delivered had to be very detailed for the students because this was a very confusing unit, that I
heard of, to teach. Students were barely able to subtract from their hundreds place value, but
once students were able to comprehend borrowing, we moved onto the thousands. It took some
time and a lot of explaining for students to understand subtracting, but from their post-
assessment, I believe many students grasped the idea of borrowing when needed. Our current
struggle with subtracting is borrowing at the top with two or more zeros. However, we are
working with them currently on that issue during our interventions time.
A question a student had was “How do I know if I solved my problem correct?” Once
that sparked his interest, others were also curious, so I reviewed it briefly, then on day 4, we
wrote out problems and learned out to check our work. I explained to the class “When you have
your subtraction problem answered, you take that number and add it to the lowest number from
had a student subtract it with me, then, I had the whole class check our work by adding.
After reviewing my lesson plan and the actual recordings of me teaching, I think I did
very well considering how low participation has been before, students’ i-Ready math scores, and
this being my first unit plan taught while slowly taking over the classroom. While talking to my
mentor teacher about day 5 when I recorded and posted my 10-minute teaching video, she
thought I could have talked more about place-value rather than borrowing, but overall did a good
job. I agree with her because a few students would mix up their place-values when explaining,
but by day 5, everyone who was participating was comprehending subtraction very well. She
explained to me that she did not expect this many students to have comprehended subtraction,
but she thinks the students’ learned a great deal from me, and vice versa. Prior to teaching the
first day of this unit, I was nervous to see where students were with subtracting, but once I got
into the groove of explaining it, I felt more confident in myself. No doubt in my mind that I
could have done any better, yet, I do believe if we were in the classroom, at least half of the
students that are at Minimal Proficiency now, would have been a lot higher. My 10-minute video
of teaching does not give my class enough credit for how much they worked on learning
Highly Proficient 3 8
(90%-100%)
Proficient
4 5
(80%-89%)
Highly Proficient 1 Male 504, 4 Male, 3 Female 1 Male 504, 5 Male, 6 Female
(90%-100%)
Proficient 1 Female ELL and 504, 1 Male, 1 1 Female ELL and 504, 1 Female ELL, 2
(80%-89%) Female Male
Partially Proficient
1 Female ELL, 1 Female 1 Female ELL
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient 1 Female ELL, 1 Male IEP, 1 Male 0
(69% and below)
Post-Assessment Analysis: Subgroup
From talking, listening, and working 1-on-1 with one of the two students’ who have an IEP, it is
shown that they really need someone to work with them. I see the difference in their work when
someone is working with them at their learning speed. For one of the boys, I noticed he has to
really focus when he is working independently. In a call with him, my mentor teacher, and I, I
walked through the steps of subtracting and stopping and asking him questions to fill in the
answer on the problem we were doing together. I then had him walk me through one of the
problems so I can see where he was with learning and explaining the subtraction process.
As for the other student with an IEP, he also needs someone working with him 1-on-1. During
Parent Teacher Conferences, his mom said that he always wants her help, but she is busy with
work. Yet, we explained to her that we always ask him if he wants help with an assignment, we
ask if he has any questions, and we try to unmute him to talk with us, but we get no response
every time. However, teaching online has been hard for them because they do not have enough 1-
on-1 time with me or my mentor teacher helping them. I think if we made time throughout our
prep time to work with the students, they will be able to complete their assignments. Yet again,
while being online, it has been hard encouraging these students to stay online and occasionally
turn their video camera on.
My two IEP students did not complete the post-test. Gathering data has been a lot more
complicating than I had thought and that is due to being online, I have no power to have students
complete the assignment like I would in the class. However, the rest of my class did great with
the post-tests, I got more students to comprehend the unit prior to the test than I had anticipated
for just because participation was low at times. My effectiveness of instruction was encouraging
students to ask questions, which was mainly “How do I know what to add to check my work?”
and “How do I know when I need to borrow?” My best explanation of walking through a
subtraction problem is going to each place value one-by-one and asking “Can I go to the store
with $8 and spend $3?” or “Can I go to the store with $0 and buy something for $3?” Then, I
would explain if I can spend the money and have some left over, then I do not need to borrow.
However, if I cannot buy something when I have no money, then I know I must borrow. I then
ask if they understand and if anyone has questions, if not we move on. This was effective for
Different days calls for different students participating and different instruction. My class has a
few students who are ready and willing to participate, but the class and I have been encouraging
and challenging the rest of the class to join in on our different uses of technology and
conversations. The subgroup data compared to the remainder of the class has increased in data
because of the encouragement students have on one another to join in and collaborate with us.
While on NearPod when students answer a question, the participation percentage increases. The
highest we have got to is 83%, but the students that have answered encourage the others we are
waiting for to answer the question so we can get to 100% participation. At first it got out of hand
with chats from the video call, but after explaining to the class that they can unmute themselves
and positively encourage others once they are called on, participation has increased. The
effectiveness of my instruction with encouragement and enthusiasm, I believe, has gone a long
way from when we first started school to now. I see a whole different class that is helpful and
positive since the beginning of the year.
The next steps for instruction would be increasing the comprehension of students checking their
work by adding and rounding. I explained the adding part in much more detail than the rounding,
but for the next step, I would explain more on rounding for students to check their work.
Long-Term Goals: Teachers who are dedicated to their profession and to improving the lives of
students will continually look for ways to grow and learn. The best way to ensure that learning is
prioritized is to create a long-term goal. Create one long term goal that is specific and
measurable. Make sure to discuss the following:
Long-Term Goal: I will reteach students how to check their work when subtracting. We will
focus on adding the lowest number of the subtraction problem to the answer to check that we
got the highest number in the subtraction problem. Students were struggling with this during
the Remainder Post-Assessment Data. The long-term goal I will be looking for is the
connection students make once they comprehend checking their work. They will check their
work at a 100% accuracy by the end of the Fall semester.
Rationale: Why did you choose this goal? How I chose this goal because I noticed after we
do you expect it to improve the outcomes of your took a week break of subtracting and came
future students? back to it, students were forgetting how to
borrow, but even more with checking their
work. I have been reviewing subtracting and
borrowing so now we can really focus on
checking our work. Students are not
comprehending the numbers to use to check
their work, so reviewing and asking questions
will help students catch on to how they need
to check their work. I expect it to improve the
outcomes because the more students see and
work with it, the better understanding they
will get and it can get set in their minds after
repeated work.