Polydactyly Overview
Polydactyly Overview
Polydactyly Overview
Hand/Peripheral Nerve
Genetic Overview of Syndactyly and Polydactyly
Humayun Ahmed, BA*†
Hossein Akbari, MD‡ Summary: Syndactyly and polydactyly—respectively characterized by fused and
Abdolhasan Emami, MD‡ supernumerary digits—are among the most common congenital limb malforma-
Mohammad R. Akbari, MD, tions, with syndactyly presenting at an estimated incidence of 1 in 2,000–3,000
PhD*†§ live births and polydactyly at a frequency of 1 in approximately 700–1,000 live
births. Despite their relatively regular manifestation in the clinic, the etiologies
of syndactyly and polydactyly remain poorly understood because of their pheno-
typic and genetic diversity. Further, even though concrete knowledge of genotypic
links has been established for some variants of syndactyly and polydactyly, there
appears to be no single comprehensive published summary of all syndromic and
nonsyndromic syndactyly and polydactyly presentations, and there is decidedly no
resource that maps all syndromic and nonsyndromic syndactylies and polydactylies
to their genetic bases. This gap in the literature problematizes comprehensive car-
rier screening and prenatal diagnosis and complicates novel diagnostic attempts.
This review thus attempts to collect all that is known about the genetic bases of
syndromic and nonsyndromic syndactylies and polydactylies, as well as to highlight
the dactyly manifestations for which no genetic bases are as yet known. Then, hav-
ing established a summation of existing and missing knowledge, this work briefly
outlines the diagnostic techniques that a genetics-reinforced understanding of syn-
dactyly and polydactyly could inform. (Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017;5:e1549;
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001549; Published online 2 November 2017.)
SYNDACTYLY AND POLYDACTYLY 5 digits per limb). Like syndactyly, polydactyly is pheno-
PHENOTYPES typically variable3 in terms of the limb affected (hand or
Syndactyly (ie, digit fusion, typically via webbing) is a foot),4 its severity, and its syndromicity or lack thereof.3
common inherited and clinically heterogeneous malfor- Though syndactyly and polydactyly are phenotypically
mation.1 It can be syndromic, comprising more than 300 well understood, their genetic bases have not been synthe-
distinct anomalies,1 or nonsyndromic, existing as 1 of 9 sized in writing and remain unclear for some types. This
nonsyndromic forms.2 It also varies phenotypically between study reviews the current knowledge on the genetics of
families. Even a single patient’s phenotype may be severe or these anomalies.
mild, unilateral or bilateral, symmetrical or asymmetrical,
complete or incomplete, cutaneous or bony, and involving SYNDACTYLY AND POLYDACTYLY
many distinct bones, with inter-limb phenotypic variation.1 GENETICS
Polydactyly is another hereditary limb malformation, Given the aforementioned morphological variation, it
characterized by supernumerary digits (ie, more than is not surprising that the genetic bases of syndactyly and
polydactyly are diverse, polygenic,5 and as yet unclear in
From the *Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College some cases. New causative genes and mutations are being
Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; †Institute discovered with advances in sequencing technology.
of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; The genes involved in syndactyly and polydactyly tend
‡Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hazrat Fatemeh to affect specific bodily regions, including the zone of po-
Hospital, Burn Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, larizing activity (ZPA): an area that controls limb structure
Tehran, Iran; and §Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University and positional identity.6–9 The ZPA disappears by day 44
of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. of embryonic development, after which time the phalan-
Received for publication March 6, 2017; accepted September 6, ges form.10 Aside from the ZPA, which is on the posterior
2017. embryo and produces fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8),
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, the apical ectodermal ridge, which is on the dorsal-ventral
Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is margin and produces FGF8, also aids in limb development.
an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0
(CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to d eclare
work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in in relation to the content of this article. The Article Processing
any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. Charge was paid for by the authors.
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001549
www.PRSGlobalOpen.com 1
PRS Global Open • 2017
The HOX genes, hedgehog pathways [Sonic Hedge- been identified. It has been explored in a large Pakistani
hog (SHH) and Indian hedgehog (IHH)], FGFs, bone family.29 Subtype 2 (Lueken type, type Ib) is usually bilat-
morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), and cartilage-derived eral, in both the hands and feet, and can be either bony or
morphogenetic proteins are also involved.11 cutaneous. It is associated with the chr2q34-q36 locus and
Thirty-nine HOX genes exist in humans; the HOXA has been studied in German and Iranian families.30 The dis-
and HOXD clusters have been associated with syndactyly ease-causing gene has not been identified. Subtype 3 (type
and polydactyly.12 Genes within the HOXD cluster and Ic, Montagu type) involves the third and fourth fingers, is
locus chr2q31 seem to be involved in syndactyly13: the typically bilateral, and can be either bony or cutaneous. It
HOXD13 gene, for example, is linked to syndactyly type V is linked to the chr2q31-q32, and mutations p.R306Q and
(SD5) and a brachydactyly-syndactyly syndrome.14 p.R306G in HOXD13. It has been studied in 2 Chinese fam-
The SHH signaling pathway plays key roles in limb de- ilies.31 Finally, subtype 4 (type I-d, Castilla type) involves the
velopment.15 SHH is affected by—or affects—several tran- fourth and fifth toes and is typically bilateral and cutane-
scription factors, namely HAND2, GLI3, ALX4, and certain ous.1 Little is known about its genetic basis, but it is typically
BMP antagonists (formin and gremlin), changes to which inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.28,30
have led to syndactyly and polydactyly.10 If disrupted, as if
ZPA activity is impacted, then SHH cannot lead to normal Syndactyly Type II
limb development; this often results in syndactyly.16 Syndactyly type II (SPD) is one of the most heteroge-
The IHH signaling pathway may influence later de- neous nonsyndromic types.1,10,29 Like SD1, SPD tends to in-
velopment, considering its roles in chondrocyte differ- volve the third and fourth fingers.1 However, unlike SD1,
entiation and ossification.17 Further, IHH is repressed by SPD is also associated with the fifth toe.10 SPD manifests
fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors,18 functioning at itself in 3 types: SPD1 (Vordingborg type), SPD2 (Debeer
a different time than WNTs and FGFs, which are involved type), and SPD3 (Malik type). In SPD1, both the HOXA
in the final stages of mesenchymal ossification19; later, in and the HOXD clusters are involved; often, a polyalanine
the last stage of digit formation, there is down-regulation expansion on HOXD13 is present.30 The locus affected is
of gremlin and restriction of FGF8 expression.20 usually chr2q31 on HOXD13. In SPD2, it is usually fibu-
Wingless-type mouse mammary tumor virus integra- lin-1 (FBLN1) on chromosome 12 that is modified, and
tion sit family members 6 and 10B (WNT6, WNT10B) are the locus involved is usually chr22q13.3.28 The mutations
involved in the developing limb bud and related to the responsible for SPD2 are usually missense mutations or
chr2q35 region [a locus implicated in syndactyly type I deletions. Finally, in SPD3, the chr14q11.2-q13 locus is
(SD1)].21 BMPs and their antagonist noggin (NOG), when affected. SPD as a whole is characterized by incomplete
blocked, also lead to syndactyly.10 GLI3 may also contrib- penetrance and high variability and has been studied in
ute22: it is involved in a range of syndromes, and a GLI3 Turkish,32 Greek, Pakistani, Chinese, and Belgian fami-
missense mutation led to syndactyly and polydactyly.23 N- lies,30 as well as in mice.33 SPD is inherited in an autosomal
Myc and zinc-finger transcription factors have caused soft- dominant manner with reductive penetrance.1
tissue syndactyly in mice.24
Syndactylies and polydactylies also vary in their patterns Syndactyly Type III
of inheritance. Most syndactyly types follow autosomal Syndactyly type III (SD3; Johnston-Kirby type, 4/5 fin-
dominant inheritance,25 but SD7 and SD9 are autosomal gers or 3/4/5 fingers fusion) usually involves soft tissue
recessive,1 and SD5 is X-linked recessive.26 Generally, auto- and only the hands1: specifically, there is complete, bilat-
somal dominant phenotypes are less severe with variable eral syndactyly between the fourth and fifth fingers, the
expressivity and incomplete penetrance. fifth finger is often shortened, and the middle digit may
be missing or underdeveloped.10 SD3 usually involves the
connexin-43 (GJA1) gene at the chr6q21-3 and sometimes
NONSYNDROMIC DACTYLIES: PHENOTYPES chr6q22-24 loci.30 SD3 has been studied in a Pakistani fam-
AND GENETICS ily.30 This type exhibits autosomal dominant inheritance
with complete penetrance.1
Syndactyly
Nonsyndromic syndactyly manifests itself as 9 distinct Syndactyly Type IV
types; at least 11 loci and 8 relevant genes have been iden- Syndactyly type IV (SD4; Haas type1) is very rare.34 It is
tified27 (Fig. 1). complete and bilateral12; often, polydactyly is associated.10
No associated conditions of the feet or bone fusion have
Syndactyly Type I been mentioned.10 SD4 involves a range of genes, including
SD1 is one of the most common nonsyndromic syndac- the SHH signaling pathway, limb development membrane
tylies28 and is associated with the third and fourth fingers or protein 1 (LMBR1), and the zone of polarizing activity
the second and third toes.28 SD1 is so diverse that it can be (ZPA) regulatory sequence (ZRS) locus at chr7q36.3.30 It
divided into 4 subtypes.28 Subtype 1 (Weidenreich type or can also further be divided into 2 subtypes: SDTY4 (Haas
zygodactyly) accounts for 70% of nonsyndromic syndactyly type) and Andersen-Hansen type. The former usually in-
cases1,29; it is bilateral, symmetrical, found exclusively in the volves the ZRS locus and LMBR1, while the genetic basis of
feet, and free of bone involvement. Subtype 1 is associated the latter is not known.30 This syndactyly has been studied
with the 3p21.31 locus, but no disease-causing gene has in Chinese families.35 SD4 is autosomal dominant.1
2
Ahmed et al. • Genetics of Polydactyly and Syndactyly
Fig. 1. Summary of nonsyndromic and selected syndromic syndactyly with their known causal genes.
3
PRS Global Open • 2017
4
Ahmed et al. • Genetics of Polydactyly and Syndactyly
Fig. 2. Summary of nonsyndromic and selected syndromic polydactyly with their known causal genes.
with TWIST1 on chr7p21.1 and FGFR2 on chr10q26.1349 and IFT172 on chr2p23.3. These syndromes typically present
and presents with autosomal dominant inheritance. with autosomal recessive or digenic recessive inheritance.
5
PRS Global Open • 2017
Fig. 3. The phenotypic manifestations of 2 of the 3 nonsyndromic polydactylies (preaxial and postaxial) and their subtypes. Adapted with
permission from Hand Malformations [Internet]. Gainesville: University of Florida. Available at https://www.peds.ufl.edu/divisions/genet-
ics/teaching/hand_malformations.htm.
6
Ahmed et al. • Genetics of Polydactyly and Syndactyly
7
PRS Global Open • 2017
25. Eaton CJ, Lister GD. Syndactyly. Hand Clin. 1990;6:555–575. 43. Avina Fierro JA, Hernandez Avina DA. A case of complete cuta-
26. Lonardo F, Della Monica M, Riccardi G, et al. A family with neous syndactyly of the toes with non-syndromic phenotype. J
X-linked recessive fusion of metacarpals IV and V. Am J Med Genet Genet Syndr Gene Ther. 2014;5:240.
A. 2004;124A:407–410. 44. Polydactyly, postaxial, type A1; PAPA1 [Internet]. Baltimore,
27. Deng H, Tan T. Advances in the molecular genetics of non-syn- Md.: John Hopkins University; c1986-2013. Available at http://
dromic syndactyly. Curr Genomics. 2015;16:183–193. www.omim.org/entry/174200. Accessed June 29, 2015.
28. Malik S, Schott J, Ali SW, et al. Evidence for clinical and genetic 45. Teaching Resources: Hand Malformations [Internet]. Gainesville,
heterogeneity of syndactyly type I: the phenotype of second and FL.: University of Florida. Available at https://www.peds.ufl.edu/
third toe syndactyly maps to chromosome 3p21.31. Eur J Hum divisions/genetics/_style/images/polydactyly-composite.gif.
Genet. 2005;13:1268–1274. Accessed June 29, 2015.
29. Castilla EE, Paz JE, Orioli-Parreiras IM. Syndactyly: frequency of 46. Ibrahimi OA, Chiu ES, McCarthy JG, et al. Understanding the mo-
specific types. Am J Med Genet. 1980;5:357–364. lecular basis of Apert syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;11:264–270.
30. Debeer P, Schoenmakers EF, Twal WO, et al. The fibulin-1 gene 47. Alessandri JL, Dagoneau N, Laville JM, et al. RAB23 mutation in
(FBLN1) is disrupted in a t(12,22) associated with a complex a large family from Comoros Islands with Carpenter syndrome.
type of synpolydactyly. J Med Genet. 2002;39:98–104. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A:982–986.
31. Dai L, Liu D, Song M, et al. Mutations in the homeodomain of 48. Cornejo-Roldan LR, Roessler E, Muenke M. Analysis of the mu-
HOXD13 cause syndactyly type 1-c in two Chinese families. PLoS tational spectrum of the FGFR2 gene in Pfeiffer syndrome. Hum
One. 2014;9:e96192. Genet. 1999;104:425–431.
32. Akarsu AN, Akhan O, Sayli BS, et al. A large Turkish kindred with 49. de Heer IM, de Klein A, van den Ouweland AM, et al. Clinical
syndactyly type II (synpolydactyly). 2. Homozygous phenotype? J and genetic analysis of patients with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome.
Med Genet. 1995;32:435–441. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1894–1902; discussion 1903.
33. Erickson RP, Wynshaw-Boris AJ. Epstein’s Inborn Errors of 50. Debeer P, Peeters H, Driess S, et al. Variable phenotype in Greig
Development: The Molecular Basis of Clinical Disorders of Morphogenesis. cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome: clinical and radiological find-
Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016: 1373. ings in 4 independent families and 3 sporadic cases with identi-
34. Hass SL. Bilateral complete syndactylism of all fingers. Am J Surg. fied GLI3 mutations. Am J Med Genet A. 2003;120A:49–58.
1940;50:363–366. 51. Stone DL, Slavotinek A, Bouffard GG, et al. Mutation of a gene
35. Sun M, Ma F, Zeng X, et al. Triphalangeal thumb-polysyndactyly encoding a putative chaperonin causes McKusick-Kaufman syn-
syndrome and syndactyly type IV are caused by genomic dupli- drome. Nat Genet. 2000;25:79–82.
cations involving the long range, limb-specific SHH enhancer. J 52. Johnston JJ, Olivos-Glander I, Killoran C, et al. Molecular and
Med Genet. 2008;45:589–595. clinical analyses of Greig cephalopolysyndactyly and Pallister-
36. Temtamy SA, McKusick VA. The Genetics of Hand Malformations. Hall syndromes: robust phenotype prediction from the type and
New York, N.Y.: Alan R. Liss New York; 1978:301–322. position of GLI3 mutations. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76:609–622.
37. Harpf C, Pavelka M, Hussl H. A variant of Cenani-Lenz syndac- 53. Der Kaloustian VM, Hoyme HE, Hogg H, et al. Possible com-
tyly (CLS): review of the literature and attempt of classification. mon pathogenetic mechanisms for Poland sequence and Adams-
Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58:251–257. Oliver syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1991;38:69–73.
38. Percin EF, Percin S. Two unusual types of syndactyly in the same 54. Short-Rib Thoracic Dysplasia 3 with or without Polydactyly;
family; Cenani-Lenz type and “new” type versus severe type I syn- SRTD3 [Internet]. Baltimore, Md.: John Hopkins University;
dactyly? Genet Couns. 2003;14:313–319. c1986-2008. Available at https://www.omim.org/entry/613091.
39. Drögemüller C, Leeb T, Harlizius B, et al. Congenital syndac- Accessed January 20, 2015.
tyly in cattle: four novel mutations in the low density lipoprotein 55. Jira PE, Waterham HR, Wanders RJ, et al. Smith-Lemli-Opitz syn-
receptor-related protein 4 gene (LRP4). BMC Genet. 2007;8:5. drome and the DHCR7 gene. Ann Hum Genet. 2003;67:269–280.
40. Faiyaz-Ul-Haque M, Zaidi SHE, King LM, et al. Fine mapping of 56. Ermito S, Dinatale A, Carrara S, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of
the X-linked split-hand/split-foot malformation (SHFM2) locus limb abnormalities: role of fetal ultrasonography. J Prenat Med.
to a 5.1-Mb region on Xq26.3 and analysis of candidate genes. 2009;3:18–22.
Clin Genet. 2005;67:93–97. 57. Chorionic Villus sampling and amniocentesis: recommenda-
41. Jamsheer A, Zemojtel T, Kolanczyk M, et al. Whole exome se- tions for prenatal counseling [Internet]. Atlanta, Ga.: Centers
quencing identifies FGF16 nonsense mutations as the cause for Disease Control and Prevention; c1998-2001 [cited June
of X-linked recessive metacarpal 4/5 fusion. J Med Genet. 2013; 29, 2015]. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/
50:579–584. mmwrhtml/00038393.htm.
42. Percin EF, Percin S, Egilmez H, et al. Mesoaxial complete syndac- 58. Delgadillo D, 3rd, Adams NS, Girotto JA. Supernumerary digits
tyly and synostosis with hypoplastic thumbs: an unusual combina- of the hand. Eplasty. 2016;16:ic3.
tion or homozygous expression of syndactyly type I? J Med Genet. 59. Biesecker LG. Polydactyly: how many disorders and how many
1998;35:868–874. genes? 2010 update. Dev Dyn. 2011;240:931–942.