Competency 1 Assessment: Alyssa Cremer Rasmussen College General Psychology Jennifer Green September 24, 2020

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

1

Competency 1 Assessment

Alyssa Cremer

Rasmussen College

General Psychology

Jennifer Green

September 24, 2020


2

Competency 1 Assessment

Summaries of the two selected works:

Selectively Social Politics: The Differing Roles of Media Use on Political Discussion:

The general purpose of this research article was to examine how using particular media

sources foster debate between similar and varying political beliefs. The study explores the debate

of same party-political beliefs (in-group), and those of different political party beliefs (out-

group). This study highlights how specific character background (uses and gratifications

perspective) (e.g., age, sex, political opinion leadership, political social identity, political content

affinity), motives for using traditional and social media for political information. The study also

highlights how the use of different media sources work together to influence discussion with

political in-group and out-group members. The study’s results allowed the authors to highlight

various distinct differences between people who talk to political in-group and out-group

members. This particular study is very relevant in today’s 45th president election world. We have

seen the use of the word “fake news”, major retractions in the media, and even censorship of

certain viewpoints on social media in regards to politics. This study can be used as a stepping

stone to further study political debate, and hopefully foster further political discussion amongst

in, and out groups.

Let's Do It Again: A Call for Replications in Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research:

The writer John Edlund clarifies the crisis with studies and articles not furnished proof-

based research with vast information to demonstrate their announcements, replication and

fabrication of research, and what journals and editors are doing to battle this emergency. The

issue with replication and creation is a two-fold, determined by the writer's very own
3

imperfections and aspiration, just as a system failure pushes the academics to deliver vast

quantities of distributions to accomplish advancement or residency. The creator points out that

even though academics are forced to distribute early and regularly, most academics do not

fabricate research. However, it utilizes single-study short reports, using specific examinations

and controls, and self-references can prompt incorrect data. The research journals have

performed a couple of steps to guarantee that the articles they distribute do have the much-

needed information like requiring the academics to preregistered, considering where the

examination has been freely evaluated, utilizing joint efforts, and long-haul research

contemplates. The writer noticed that it is significant for the journals to use a mix of all the

above strategies to guarantee that they are distributing proof-based research in their distributions.

The future of psychology practice requires that psychologists expand the scope of their

traditional practice; adapt, and become health care providers, not just mental health providers.

Using evidence-based practices, assessment, and outcome measures; incorporate the advancing

technology into psychological practices, including electronic health records; and change training

and focus to meet the needs of society. The future of psychological science requires that

psychologists train and work in multidisciplinary teams, employ different methods and

approaches, and shift focus to translational science. The future of the profession requires

substantial changes in education to prepare students for science and practice in the 21st century.

To begin, let us address some background information on psychology. Psychology is the

scientific study of human behavior and mental processes. The effects of psychological studies are

more relevant and respected than any period in the past, and top researchers are always

uncovering discoveries and applications for psychology. With psychology, we can help people

tremendously because it addresses why an individual may act the way they do. With professional
4

insight, psychologists may help individuals improve their future behaviors, decision making, and

stress management skills. This information gives people a chance for self-confidence, healthier

communication and relationships, and a successful career.

The study of psychology is exceedingly complicated because not one-two people are the

same. However, like in any study or pattern, there are instances in which somethings vary in

continuity. For example, a survey said that any two people would both choose the same activity

if given the option days in advance. Human beings are the most difficult "animal" to analyze, and

so to answer your question, the limitations of psychology include consciousness and free

thought; no two people will think the same unless some psychological trick is present.

Problems facing the future of psychology:


Open access
A lot, if not most of psychology research isn’t really “published” – it is printed within journals

that openly deny access to the public (unless you are willing to pay for a hefty subscription fee).

Some might say this is not any different than traditional book publishing, so what's the problem?

But the public being denied access to science is the very same public that already funds most

psychology research, including the subscription fees for universities. So why, you might ask, is

taxpayer-funded research invisible to the taxpayers that funded it? The answer is complicated

enough to fill a 140-page government report, but the short version is that the government places

the business interests of corporate publishers ahead of the public interest in accessing science.

Bigger data
Psychology research is statistically undermined. What this means is that even when genuine

phenomena exist, most experiments don’t have large enough samples to detect them.
5

References

Edlund, J. E. (2016). Invited editorial: Let's do it again: A call for replications in Psi Chi Journal

of Psychological Research. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 21(1), 59-61.

Importance of Psychology Today | What's happening at UDC! (2018, March 7). Retrieved from

https://www.udc.edu/social-udc/2018/03/07/importance_psychology_todays_world/

Ponder, J. D., & Haridakis, P. (2015). Selectively social politics: The differing roles of media use

on political discussion. Mass Communication & Society, 18(3), 281-302.

doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.940977

McLeoud, S. (2011). Simply psychology. What is psychology? Retrieved from:

https://www.simplypsychology.org/whatispsychology.html

You might also like