Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews: Suellen C.S. Costa, Antonia Sonia A.C. Diniz, Lawrence L. Kazmerski

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 29

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rser

Dust and soiling issues and impacts relating to solar energy systems:
Literature review update for 2012–2015
Suellen C.S. Costa a, Antonia Sonia A.C. Diniz a, Lawrence L. Kazmerski a,b,n
a
Pontificía Universidade Católica Minas Gerais (PUC Minas), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
b
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute (RASEI), a partnership between the University of Colorado Boulder (CU-Boulder) & the National Renewable
Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO, United States

art ic l e i nf o a b s t r a c t

Article history: The purpose of this review survey is to provide a literature compilation, updating materials reported in
Received 19 November 2015 several review papers on solar-device soiling and mitigation approaches published over the past 5 years.
Received in revised form The focus is on the period 2013–2015, but an updated listing is also provided for the year 2012 for
12 April 2016
completeness. This literature review also provides the first update for a periodic, single collation report
Accepted 26 April 2016
on such publications proposed in this journal two years ago. This review presents a listing of the pub-
lications, their publication source, and some brief tabulated information to help guide the reader into the
Keywords: focus of each of the works.
Photovoltaics & 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Concentrating solar power
Soiling
Dust
Reliability
Performance, mitigation, literature

Contents

1. Introduction and background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33


2. Review papers (2010–2015) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
3. Discussion of publications 2013–2015 . . . . . . . . . ................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Literature Summary (References Presented by Year in Alphabetical Order). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

1. Introduction and background Africa, the Middle East, India, as well as the desert areas of China,
Australia, and the United States. Coincidently, these areas are also
Soiling of solar collector surfaces ranks with climate conditions characterized by high airborne-particle environments, intense
(temperature, humidity) and irradiance (spectrum, uniformity, dust storms, and water-availability concerns.
intensity) as the major concerns for component and system The interests and critical nature of these soiling issues are
reliability. Though R&D on soiling or dust accumulation has now reflected by the publication history, represented in the histogram
spanned into its 8th decade, many mechanisms remain to be of Fig. 1. The initial period includes contributions from the solar
understood and problems to be solved. These needs are intensified pioneers (Hottel, Woertz, Tomlinson, Garg – are among the lea-
by the growing markets in the solar-rich areas of the northern ders) who envisioned that avoiding soiling would be important for
the future adoption and use of collectors for their solar-thermal
n
applications. The coming of the oil embargo in the early- to mid-
Corresponding author at: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute (RASEI), a
1970s brought a focus on solar energy and expanded terrestrial
partnership between the University of Colorado Boulder (CU-Boulder) & the
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO, United States. applications—with the rise in publications during this period
E-mail address: [email protected] (L.L. Kazmerski). primarily on the effects on heliostats and mirrors used with

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.059
1364-0321/& 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
34 S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61

concentrating solar-thermal power (CSP). Political changes at the (Table 1, discussed in the next section). It also builds on a com-
start of the 1980s (and the diminishing of energy costs/crises) mitment in a 2013 publication in this journal [see Tarver et al.
resulted in a loss of funding and related publications in solar and 2013 in Table 1] to provide a periodic update to the publication
dust issues. The 1990s heralded some shifts. First, the rise of reference base, as a “living document” to afford readers,
market experiments (e.g., “1000-, 10,000-, 100,000-, million-roof researchers, developers, and system deployers with a literature
programs” worldwide), large central-station CSP, and then the base of research investments, product advancements, and latest
successes of space exploration, and some limited renewed funding research/advancements addressing of critical issues relating to this
for solutions to soiling reliability issues. There was, for example, a dust/soiling reliability area. This document covers the period 2013
major rise in investments coming from the PV-powered NASA through what has transpired through 2015. However, we have
Mars rover (“Sojourner”)—which experienced extreme dust con- included a compilation, a more complete single listing for 2012—
ditions with a remoteness that would not allow firsthand manual contained in the first section of the Literature Summary (Refer-
cleaning! This invigorated research into prevention approaches ences Section). The majority of these 2012-papers continue to
(coatings, vibration/ultrasonics, electrostatics, and especially cover the effect of soiling and dust accumulation on the perfor-
electrodynamic screens) that would, in turn, reignite such high- mance of various solar technologies in various locations in the
tech remedies for earth-based systems as well. world. However, the focus of this literature review is on 2013–
The new century was marked by a growth in PV, both research 2015. In this period, we emphasize journal and conference pub-
and market expansions. This is attributed primarily to incentive lications that can be found through their “DOI” or web identifi-
programs such as the feed-in tariffs in Germany and Europe, and cations—though some open-literature articles are also listed
system buy-down subsidies in Japan and the U.S. Soiling research because of their content and interest.
and product developments shifted as well toward PV because of
the rise in applications and country programs. With the China
dominance of manufacturing (and accompanying beneficial col- 2. Review papers (2010–2015)
lapse in PV prices) starting in 2009/2010—as well as the rise in
interest in new markets and investments in the desert locations Several key review papers covering PV, CPV, and CSP dust and
(Saudi Arabia, Qatar, U.A.E. and other Gulf countries, Egypt, India, soiling have been published over the past few years, and all have
as well as the U.S., Australia, and China), the publications addres- fairly high citation indices indicative of their coverage, interest,
sing dust and soiling issues rose to their highest annual levels; and significance. These papers are summarized in Table 1, which
levels that can be expected to grow further because of the eco- provides the source authors, the publication year, a summary of
nomic and energy benefits of dust mitigation for these solar- the review contribution and focus, and the solar technology cov-
electric generators. ered. This also gives the reference base cited in each. Certainly
This survey follows on reference databases provided in several prominent among these is that in 2010 by M. Mani and R. Pillai,
reviews that have been published on dust/soiling since 2010 which summarized performance investigations, recommendations

Fig. 1. Histogram of publications on dust and soiling showing general technology emphasis and driving forces (colored regions) underlying the positive or negative growth of
the publication levels. Recent rise in publication volume responds to the significant lowering of PV costs and opening of markets in the solar-rich and dust-environment-rich
areas of the world.
S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61 35

Table 1
Noteworthy recent review papers addressing soiling and dust issues.

Source Contribution/Focus of review Technology

Mani and Pillai (2010) Evaluation of current research status on impact of dust on performance of Flat-panel and concentrating PV
PV systems. In-depth analysis of dust accumulation mechanisms and
potential mitigation approaches. Climate zone definitions—and compre-
hensive evaluation of potential severity of soiling in various world climate
regions/conditions.
[23 References]
Bakirci (2012) Review of methodologies to determine optimum tilt angles for solar col- General solar collectors
lectors; irradiance with indications for soiling/dust.
Case study for irradiance situation in Turkey.
[57 References]
Mekhilef, Rahman, and Kamalisarvestani (2012) Review of the effects of dust accumulation, air velocity, and humidity on Flat-panel PV
the performance of PV cells/systems—and the interrelationships among
these three components. Indications of the effects of these on system
design and deployment. Specific results for Malaysia region highlighted.
[39 References]
Ahmed Darwish, Kazem, and Sopian (2013) Summary review of impact of dust and related environmental conditions PV (flat plate) technologies
on PV performance.
Scope of the review encompasses: dust properties (physical size, mor-
phology, electrostatic deposition behavior), particle biological and electro-
chemical properties, optimization and modeling studies, effects in various
geographical/climatic zones (latitude) considering factor of tilt, altitude,
and orientation, wind patterns and minimum dust accumulation for var-
ious PV module configurations, dust-particle geometry effects on its
deposition behavior, electrostatic attraction on dust settlement, impact of
progressive water (cement formation, staining, etc.) on performance.
Review considers work in periods before and after 1990. Discussion of dust
accumulation models.
[22 References]
Bao, Zhang, Cai, Jiang, Xv, and Jia (2013) Review of dust effects on PV performance (efficiency); dust deposition Flat-panel PV
models/mechanisms, transmission losses and the effects of environmental/
weather conditions on dust deposition. Commonly used PV module
cleaning techniques (electrode screen dust mitigation and mechanical dust
cleaning techniques) are discussed. Research directions evaluated.
[14 References]
Midtdal and Jelle (2013) Comprehensive review of current-market, self-cleaning glazing products Solar applications (using glazing
for soiling mitigation. products)
Future research and technology directions—emphasis on solar applications.
In-depth evaluation of optical property effects/aberrations.
Hydrophobic, catalytic hydrophilic, etc. covered in detail.
[48 References]
Sharma and Chandal (2013) Review and literature on performance and degradation of PV modules PV modules (outdoor exposure)
under outdoor operation for identifying research gaps for long term relia-
bility of PV modules and improving the PV qualification standards for
various geographical and climatic conditions. Reliability includes soiling
issues.
[84 References]
Tarver, Al-Qaraghuli, and Kazmerski (2013) Comprehensive overview of soiling problems, primarily those associated PV (flat-panel and concentration),
with ‘‘dust’’ (e.g. dry sand) and combined dust–moisture conditions. flat-panel solar thermal, CSP (mirrors,
Discussion of key contributions to the understanding, performance effects, heliostats, etc.)
and mitigation of these problems based on nature, pre-emption (e.g., sit-
ing), restoration (cleaning) and preventions (coatings, etc.).
Compilation of compositional, chemical, and morphological analysis of dust
from throughout the world.
Discussion of research needs and directions.
[256 References]
Butuza (2014) Focused literature search for the effects of soiling, dust and other surface PV Panels
deposits, on the performance of solar photovoltaic collectors. (Primarily
provides a procedure for searching.)
[16 References]
Ghazi, Sayigh, and Ip (2014) Review of dust effects on performance PV and solar thermal collectors from Flat-panel PV primarily, some flat
4 different climate zones. Separates review of studies from 3 historical time plate solar thermal
periods. Guidelines for mitigation and cleaning procedures pertinent to
climate conditions presented.
[92 References]
Hernandez, Easterb, Murphy-Mariscal, Maestre, Review direct and indirect environmental impacts – both beneficial and Large-scale solar PV and CSP plants
Tavassoli, Allen, Barrows, Belnap, Ochoa-Hueso, adverse – of utility-scale solar energy (USSE) development, including
Ravi, and Allen (2014) impacts on biodiversity, land-use and land-cover change, soils, water
resources, and human health.
Environmental effects of panel washing (water).
Soil erosion and effect on soil accumulation on panels; reducing effects by
vegetation.
Performance effects reviewed. [156 References]
36 S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61

Table 1 (continued )

Source Contribution/Focus of review Technology

Kazem, Chaichan, and Kazem (2014) Review of effects of soiling and dust conditions on the PV performance in Flat-panel PV
Iraq. Review of studies on the degradation rates and mechanisms. Effects of
moisture and cleaning requirements.
Climate zone issues presented and discussed in relationship to the soiling
problems.
Written to interest research, design, and installer groups.
[130 References]
Sayyah, Horrenstein, and Mazumder. (2014) Comprehensive review of energy-yield losses due to soiling and dust Flat-panel PV primarily (various tech-
accumulation with some focus on the semi-arid and desert locations. nologies included)
Effects of tilt angle, time exposures, various surfaces (materials), and
locations (climate zones). Laboratory and outdoor experiments are inclu-
ded. Summary and evaluation of cleaning techniques (natural, traditional,
and emerging).
[120 References]
Darwish, Kazem, Sopian, Al-Ghoul, and Alawadhi Review of dust pollutant type on performance of PV panels. In-depth eva- Flat-panel PV
(2015) luation of various reports and various compositions of dust, the accumu-
lation properties/mechanisms, and relationships to various PV parameters.
[42 References]
Maghami, Hizam, Gomes, Radzi, Resdad, Hajigh- Review of “key contributions” to the understanding, performance effects, PV Panels
orbani and power loss due to soiling and dust on solar panels. Categorization of
(2016) two shading types. Included are discussions of several cleaning techniques
and dust adhesion prevention approaches.
[55 References]

for mitigation of dust issues, and documented a useful and approach and the large number of investments in installations).
important categorization of climatic-zone influences for flat-panel Finally, some “special reports of interest” are included at the end of
and concentrating PV. This review paper ushered a series of other the annual references. These are reports that include aspects of
important contributions—each with a specific intent, area, and soiling or dust conditions, though the major focus of these pertain
focus. These review papers provide a very useful basis for under- to other aspects of solar technology concerns.
standing the issues, what has been accomplished —from mon- Tables 2–4 provide summaries of the research and develop-
itoring performance through mitigating the problems; from basic ment publications for the years 2013, 2014, and 2015 respectively.
adhesion mechanisms to dust composition and morphology; from The corresponding references (provided in Section 5. Literature
theory and modeling through experimental and measurement Summary) have the “DOI” or internet access links wherever pos-
techniques; and from current comprehension to future sible. The tables provide the geographical location and duration of
research needs. the study (if appropriate), the technology addressed, the major
results, and some related observations on the publication. Inclu-
ded at the end of the Literature Summary are several specialized
3. Discussion of publications 2013–2015 reports and publications that include some higher level discus-
sions of the importance of soiling issues to solar technology
The number of publications during this period continue the reliability. These range from “country programs” and professional
trend beginning in 2009—with a growing volume reflecting both organization reports/forecasts to specialized efforts at establishing
the investment in research funding in reliability and in the solar device reliability/durability associated with specific climate
incredible expansion of installations worldwide. Most of these are or installation requirements.
concerned with the effect of dust or soiling at various locations in Again, the primary purpose of this paper is to provide a “one-
the world. This remains an important contribution to the knowl- stop”, complete-as-possible reference listing of the publications
edge base for several reasons. First, this provides inputs to a for the period 2012 though 2015 (with 2015 having the highest
growing interest in establishing a global encyclopedia of actual number of annual publications to date) as an assistance to those
dust and soiling trends. Second, these data provide important involved with these soiling and dust issues for their own work.
information for installers and system holders. The information
benefits range from assisting in better site location to establishing
reasonable cleaning schedules that can be an immense benefit to
the operation and maintenance costs for the PV systems. And 4. Summary
finally, these studies provide a basis for collaboration among
research and developers (e.g., for PV power plants) to address the This paper has provided an update of publications for the
issues of soiling and mitigation. timeframe 2012–2015, guided by the proposal in the earlier review
The publications also indicate some trends toward these con- in this journal. This compilation builds on the reference basis
cerns with mitigation. This spans the spectrum from restoration provided in the review papers (Table 1) that have appeared in the
(cleaning with brushes, pressurized air/gas, wiping, and use of past 5 years. It is acknowledged that the is a best-effort, knowing
water and various solvents and hybrid methods) to higher- that with the extended literature and publication base in our
technology approaches based on superhydrophobic/super- multi-media world that some significant contributions are not
hydrophilic coatings and electrodynamic and electrostatic screens. included through this period to the end of 2015. Again, we ask the
Though some of the publications address CSP (mirrors, heliostats) help of those working in this area to provide us with any pub-
and CPV, the overwhelming number of these are directed toward lications that we have inadvertently missed. We do anticipate
PV flat-plate technologies (reflecting the price benefits of this solar updating this compilation again for 2016, and annually thereafter.
Table 2
Summary of dust and soiling papers in 2013 indicating primary focus, device/materials investigate, conditions and findings. The Focus Code (for primary contributions) is: *P ¼Performance, *MS¼ Modeling/Simulation;
*CM ¼ Composition/Morphology; *TR¼ Transmission/Reflection; *CE ¼ Cost/Economics; *MC ¼Mitigation/Cleaning; *A¼ ambient conditions/effects; *I¼ Instrumentation, *S ¼spectral effects, *TO¼ Tilt/Orientation.

Publication Source Focus* (see Location [Duration] Solar Device Type Key Findings Comments/Other Conditions
code below)

Adinoyi and Said P, C Saudi Arabia (Eastern Pro- Crystalline Si Modules 50% power loss for uncleaned modules over this period. Temperature effects compared between single-crystal and
(2013) vince) [6 months] Power tracking improves output and decreases dust accumu- multicrystalline technologies
lation.
Dust sample evaluated for composition/particle size
Ahmed Darwish et al. P, CM, ME Laboratory Studies Crystalline Si Modules Discusses and investigates the effect of some environmental Effects of wind speed and direction.
(2013b) variables with dust on the PV performance. Evaluates and Modeling of dust coverage effects.
compares result to other research on effect of dust properties, Module cleaning (effects).
effect of PV system parameters and effects of environment
parameters.
Use of artificial soils for investigations.

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
Al-Ammri et al. P, CM, MC Laboratory Studies Urban Street Lights, Si Power losses by month, with 460% for 3-month period Feb- Indications of performance loss of the panels due to dust
(2013) lights Baghdad, Iraq [3-6 Modules Apr; Comprehensive data provided. accumulation.
months] Morphology evaluations by microscope indicated particles Panels at 26 meters on streetlights.
with irregular shapes (roughly spherical) Temperature/irradiance measured.
Particles have concentrations of carbon-based chemicals from Bird dropping problems (including chemical interactions
local refineries (enhanced adhesion) with modules)
Cleaning requirements discussed.
Al-Sabounchi et al. P, MC Abu Dhabi, UAE Si Modules-36KW Monthly monitoring of PV system loss. July timeframe worst Complete system evaluation (temperature, irradiance,
(2013) [ 46 months] system with 27% loss due to dust. time of day parameters, inverters, etc.)
Monthly cleaning cycle proposed.
Appels et al. (2013) P, CM, MC, TR Central Europe (Belgium) [5 Module cover glass; Si 3%-4% loss after 5 weeks exposure. SEM studies of accumulated particles (dust, pollen, etc.).
weeks] PV modules Water cleaning with soft water required (transmission loss due Cleaning cycles discussed.
to hard water shown).
Studies of glass transmission loss with artificial dust.
Awwad et al. (2013) P Amman, Jordan [3 month 240-W c-Si modules Comparison in power output between cleaned and dust- Cleaning schedule indicated (daily)
period] accumulated modules; “Energy Gap” evaluated
Bai et al. (2013) MS, CE Modeling of Phoenix, Arizona Si modules, 2-residen- Empirical modeling assuming annual 5% soiling loss Study of assumed soiling rates to model costs and other
systems [4 9000 hours] tial systems, 5KW and Extensive and detailed cost, payback, tariff data. consumer issues.
6KW (glass surface) Financial modeling for PV systems
Bi et al. (2013) CM, I Urban Environments General Technique for Novel method for collecting and evaluating dust samples col- Mainly a technique that can be applied to solar collector
Sampling and Analysis lected from roadside locations evaluations
Focus on evaluation of trace elements (e.g., Pb, anthropogenic
contamination in urban areas)
Boyle et al. (2013) TR Outdoors, Commerce City, Module cover glasses For dust accumulations o 1.5 g/m2, light transmission was Periodic procedure to prevent volatilization of deposited
Colorado USA [1.5 years] reduced by 6% per g/m2 of dust accumulation; Incidence angle dust
does not impact the transmission reduction caused by dust Sampling of 4100
deposition.
Brooks et al. (2013) P, MC Tucson, Arizona USA Flat-plate PV Modules Comparison of 3 methodologies comparing cleaned and soiled All modules indicate  1% gain in efficiency after cleaning
modules: (1) Energy yields at MPP; (2) I-V characteristics of
individual modules in field; (3) I-V characteristics of individual
modules under simulator Method 3 reported most precise.
Canada (2013) P, TO Desert Southwest USA [Data - Utility-Scale c-Si PV Soiling evaluated considering: Tilt angle, human activity Washing procedures
20-year period] Annual power loss rates: 3%-6%
Caron and Littmann P, I California USA [ 41 month] Thin-Film CdTe Automated technique (monitoring station) to evaluate effects Periodically cleaned module compared to uncleaned
(2013) of dust accumulation on performance. module.
Complex setup that eliminates sources of errors for precise Small rainfalls (  0.5 mm rain) enough to restore perfor-
evaluations. mance of frameless module.
Soiling rates of 11.5%/month reported (agricultural areas);
Charabi and Gastli MS, P Case Study for Oman General PV Installa- Effects of dust & temperature during the site assessment for Different PV technologies are evaluated with CPV technology
(2013) tions Modeled; CPV large PV power plant in order to mitigate their vulnerability providing higher potential for implementing large solar
Focus (performance losses) and optimize their operation efficiency. plants. In fact, if all highly suitable land is exploited for CPV
Case study use to eliminate areas from site consideration. plants, supplying more than 750 times the current total
power supply in Oman (estimated at 16.1 TWh in 2010).

37
38
Table 2 (continued )

Publication Source Focus* (see Location [Duration] Solar Device Type Key Findings Comments/Other Conditions
code below)

Dastoori et al. (2013) P,A,TO Laboratory Simulations/Tests Amorphous Si Mod- Experiments to investigate the relation between the amount of Results: Significant effect on PV module voltage
(effects of dust charge) ules (3) charge on dust particles and their impact on the reduction of Epoxy powder used to simulate dust.
the PV modules output voltage.
Complementary effects of tilt angle
Della-Guistina et al. P, I Laboratory Studies Reference Modules Sinton Instruments FMT-350 to measure the effect of soiling Sinton Instruments FMT-350 module I-V flash tester using
(2013) and light induced degradation on PV modules. NREL primary calibration reference modules
Dunn et al. (2013) P Field testing of Soiling Mon- Thin-Film CdTe Soiling Ratio (SR) defined and determined. Detailed description and evaluation of two-module (one
itoring Station Modules Soiling monitoring station designed and evaluated cleaned, one not) station with instrumentation
Uncertainty analysis provided (corrections for external para-
meters-T, irradiance, wind, etc.)
El-Din et al. (2013) P, A Alexandria, Egypt [2 months] Thin-Film PV Module As dust deposition density increased from 0 to 0.36 mg cm-2, Effect of humidity since site was located near Mediterra-

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
the corresponding reduction of efficiency and short circuit nean Sea.
current Isc are degraded by 17.71%. Reduction in Voc was only to Dust effects more pronounced on cloudy days.
97.86 of the clean module value.
The average degradation of power and efficiency during the
entire period of work (30 days) is 9.86%.
Ghazi et al (2013) P, TO Brighton, UK [1 month] and Glass cover sheets; Transmission as function of soiling for various tilt angles Rainy conditions in UK tended to clean panels—so soiling
Laboratory experiments Examination of c-Si (Brighton outdoor conditions) as function of average dust density was not a major issue. Other sources (birds) provided
module installation Comparisons to indoor controlled tests. issues for PV modules (shading)
Gostein et al. (2013) P, A General outdoor measure- Thin-Film CdTe and Examines the difference between a soiling ratio (SR) metric Establishes differences and needs in monitoring power or
ment conditions/locations Cryst-Si Modules calculated from measured temperature-corrected short-circuit short-circuit current.
current values (SRIsc) (the fraction of irradiance reaching the
soiled modules) versus a SR calculated from measured tem-
perature-corrected PV module maximum power values
(SRPmax) (the fraction of power produced by the soiled mod-
ules compared to clean modules).
Clearly shows the need to determine power and Isc monitoring
as representative.
Gottschaig et al. P, S, A Loughborough, UK [6 years] Thin-Film a-Si, c-Si Focus primarily on operating conditions (temperature, irra- Minor focus on soiling/snow
(2013) and CIGS modules diance, spectrum)
Good analysis our outdoor exposure testing.
Hirohata et al. (2013) P Japan [5 months] PMMA Fresnel Lens Measurements with and without superhydrophobic (SH) Relationship between dust accumulation and wind con-
(CPV) coatings (anti-soiling) ditions discussed.
Without SH: 7.1% reduction after 5 months; With SH: 4.2% in
same period.
John et al. (2013) P India Super-hydrophobic Development of TiO2-based SH coating for dust mitigation, Prototype system
antisoiling coatings coupled with water delivery system.
System design presented.
Kalogirlou et al. P, MC Cyprus and Controlled Mono-, Multicrystal- Performance under prevailing Cyprus soiling conditions. Interesting experiments with moisture.
(2013) Experiments [ 41 year] line and Amorphous Si Artificial dust & dust/moisture controlled experiments Cleaning experiences related (little required in summer;
Modules Power reductions comparisons among 3 technology types (as periodic cycles recommended during other times).
high as 43% loss in power)
Dry dust affects a-Si module less than other two types
Kawamoto and Shi- MC Laboratory Testing PV Panel Cleaning Electrodynamic system using electrostatic force to remove Power used is near zero.
bata (2013) System sand from module surface.
Design uses parallel wire electrodes embedded in a cover glass
plate of a solar pane (with single-phase voltage applied)—80%
effective in dust removal
Kazem et al. (2013) P Laboratory controlled study Multicrystalline Si Study of different dust/particle/pollutant types (ash, sand, red Power output reported as function of time.
with outdoor tests module soil, calcium carbonate, silica gel) on the performance para-
meters of a commercial PV module.
Klimm et al. (2013) P, MC, CE Laboratory Studies 10 MW PV plant as Anti-soiling coatings evaluated for effectiveness (dust mitiga- Comparison of glass types
baseline tion and durability).
Economic analysis of financial gain for 10MW PV plant with
anti-soil investment.
Kumar et al. (2013) CM Laboratory studies (controlled Si panel (12 cm x 8 cm; Modeled showing both exponential and linear dependence of Dust: Bentonite-clay (aluminium phyllosilicate)
conditions) glass surface) the efficiency on the gram-accumulation.
Levitan (2013) P Deserts CSP and Other Solar Popular discussion of what may limit the deployment of solar Scientific American “Clean Energy Wars”
Technologies technologies in the desert regions (dust, water)
Marion et al. (2013) P, MS Colorado, USA [2 winter peri- 6 PV systems Focus on snow Good analogies for particulate soiling (models useful)
ods (2010-2012)] Measured monthly PV losses of up to 90%, annual losses from
1% to 12%.
Residential and non-residential systems
Massi Pavan et al. MS Italy (PV plant data) Labora- Large-scale PV plants Comparison between two different modeling techniques for Modeling and results useful for determining cleaning
(2013) tory modeling effort the determination of the effect (power losses) of soiling on cycles.
large-scale PV plants (neural network based).
Comparisons to standard test condition results.
Mejia and Kleissl P, TO California, USA [year-long Residential and Com- Changes in efficiency of 186 residential and commercial PV Losses reported by geographical location in California
(2013) study] mercial PV sites were quantified during dry periods during 2010 Annual energy yield data
Installations Soiling losses averaged 0.051% per day overall and 26% of the
sites had losses greater than 0.1% per day
Module tilt angles investigated

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
Midtdal and Jelle P, MS General Mitigation Coatings for Extensive examination and evaluation of mitigation coatings Excellent presentation on mitigation coatings, their use,
(2013) Solar Collectors for solar products. their limitations, and their benefits.
Currently, photocatalytic hydrophilic self-cleaning (dust) pro-
ducts appear superior to the hydrophobic. Perhaps it is that the
the hydrophobic products are “easy-to-clean” rather than
“self-cleaning”.
Hydrophobic products have substantial benefits indoors, see-
ing that photocatalytic actions does not work without UV
radiation, whereas photocatalytic hydrophilic products seem
to have the greatest potential for further use with outdoor
glazing products.
Photocatalytic hydrophilic products require manual cleaning
as well as the hydrophobic products.
Moharram et al. P, MC Cairo, Egypt [  45 days] 14-KW power plant- Efficiency decreased 50% after 45 days of cleaning with non- German University in Cairo
(2013) Crystalline Si Modules pressurized water Focus on minimizing water use in cleaning
Using cleaning solution of anionic and cationic surfactants, Detailed system description/design
efficiency remained constant (no degradation)
“Cleaning the PV panels using the developed water system and
a mixture of surfactants minimizes the amount of water nee-
ded for cleaning as well as the energy for spraying the water”
Ndaiye et al. (2013) P Senegal [1-year study] Commercial Multi- Losses in module parameters (Voc, Isc, Pm, FF) as a function of Power loss rates up to 17%/month observed.
and Polycrystalline Si dust accumulation over annual exposure. Consideration of shading effects.
modules (2 locations) Power loss 18%-78% (mainly through Im)
Losses in FF differing significantly for mc and pc modules
(different manufacturers)
Piliougine et al. TR, P Southern Spain [1-year] 6-Crystalline Si Evaluation of a new, commercial self-cleaning coating for 3 coated/3 uncoated modules for comparison.
(2013) Modules photovoltaic applications Inhomogeneity of dust distribution caused additional
Mean daily loss: 3.3%/day for uncoated; 2.5%/day for coated. power losses.
Transmission losses: 12% uncoated, 10% coated.
Qasem et al. (2013) P, MS, CM, TO Kuwait [Several years] CdTe Modules Spatially-resolved 3 dimensional model is developed using Temperature-performance for CdTe
circuit analysis software PSPICE to investigate inhomogeneous, Module hot-spots due to dust shading
deposited dust on PV modules
Effect of tilt angle on dust accumulation
Extensive performance and reliability information
Rajput and Sudhakar P Outdoors; Bopal, India Two Si panels (Each Power and efficiency monitored as function of accumulation; Monitored solar radiation, temperature
(2013) [undefined timeframe] 0.404 m2) glass surface Power reduction up to 92% and efficiency loss up to 89%)
Rao et al. (2013) P, A Tropical Locations India PV Technologies Focus PV in tropical locations. Experimental evaluations of panels in field.
Effects of wind, temperature, dust and other environmental Similar to paper published in 2014
conditions are evaluated and discussed.
Sabah and Faraj MC Laboratory Automated Robotic Cleaning cycles determined using sensors Though title indicated “self cleaning solar panels”, an
(2013) Cleaning System Robotic, automated brushing system design is presented for PV automated robotic system with sensors is described.
panels
Mexico City, Mexico Detailed information about overall system performance

39
40
Table 2 (continued )

Publication Source Focus* (see Location [Duration] Solar Device Type Key Findings Comments/Other Conditions
code below)

Santana-Rodriguez, PV System (Power Grid-connected system evaluation


et al. (2013) Plant) 6.1 kW 4 solar PV technologies: mono-Si, poly-Si, a-Si:H, and CdS/
CdTe
Comparison for soiling and other environmental conditions
Typical environmental pollution throughout the year in Mex-
ico City causes the deposition of a fine dust layer onto the
system “practically in a permanent way.”
An estimated loss of around 10% due to dust typical.
Sayyah et al. (2013) P, MC General CSP Focus on the impact of dust accumulation on concentrated Compare natural (rain) cleaning, manual cleaning, and
photovoltaic (CPV) and concentrated solar power (CSP) sys- EDS
tems.

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
Electrodynamic Screens (EDS) as mitigation methodology
Schaeffer et al. (2013) MC General Dust Mitigation Development of transparent superhydrophobic coatings for Application to instrument protection but also to dust
Coatings large surface areas—based on functionalized silica nanoparticles mitigation.
to coat optical elements and measured their transmission Interesting micro-level physical studies and spectral
between 400 nm to 800 nm. effects.
Smith et al. (2013) P, MC Portland, Oregon USA [ 44 PV Arrays (Si) Power losses up to 4% for uncleaned panels (17 days). Temperature effects reported
months] Beneficial effects of rainfall and manual cleaning reported. Cleaning procedures documented
Sueto et al. (2013) MC Laboratory experiments PMMA Fresnel Lens Anti-soiling coating structure: WO3/Graded Layer/Acrylic Applied coatings to commercial Fresnel lens used in CPV
(CPV) Urethane Capping Layer/PMMA Lens (effective in reducing particle adhesion)
Coating effective in reducing particle adhesion and the surface Detailed information on coating application.
electrostatic potential
Relationship between these parameters investigated
Touati et al. (2013a) P Qatar [100 days] Monocrystalline Si and 10% decrease in efficiency due to dust accumulation during Cleaning schedules indicated.
Amorphous Si this period. Temperature effects on technology types reported.
Modules Amorphous panel surfaces less affected by dust accumulation
than the crystalline Si ones
Touati et al. (2013b) P, CM Qatar Monocrystallin Si Mono-crystalline PV panels, caused the efficiency to decrease Some indications and evaluations of durability (e.g.,
Modules by 10%. This limitation makes solar PV an less reliability power undergoing cleaning)
source for unattended/remote locations
Cleaning challenges discussed (regular cycles)
Tylim (2013) P, CE, MC General PV Discussions of effects on annual energy delivery (case studies). Cleaning schedule requirements
Requirements for periodic cleaning Cost-benefits
Wang, et al. (2013) CM,MC, Laboratory studies; micro- General studies of AFM evaluations of force between particles and insulating Use of AFM to measure force. Good fundamental study.
scale force investigations adhesion surfaces. Result showed that charge is a factor in attracting
particles, but not in the force holding them to the insulator
Yadav et al. (2013) A,CM Laboratory-wind tunnel Heliostats (CSP) Understanding of deposition of dust on heliostats (planar); Air Soil composition of Jodpur studied and saltation in region;
experiments flow and deposition studied for single and multiple heliostat Ash used for experiment comparable to particles collected
configurations; Velocity distribution and flow pattern critical from PV panels in region.
to determining deposition
Zhou et al. (2013) MC Laboratory Studies Western Electrodynamic Physical investigations of dust particle movements on surfaces Detailed modeling and analysis.
China Screens for dust electrodynamic screens.
Mathematical model of the dust removal efficiency and the
optimization method for electric curtain design (multivariate
function optimization methods).
Theory basis for the development of self-cleaning techniques
for large solar systems under climate conditions of western
China

*P ¼Performance, *MS¼ Modeling/Simulation; *CM ¼ Composition/Morphology; *TR¼ Transmission/Reflection; *CE ¼ Cost/Economics; *MC¼ Mitigation/Cleaning; *A ¼ ambient conditions/effects; *I¼ Instrumentation; *S ¼Spectral
Effects; TO ¼ Tilt/Orientation
Table 3
Summary of dust and soiling papers in 2014 indicating primary focus, device/materials investigate, conditions and findings. The Focus Code (for primary contributions) is: *P ¼ Performance, *MS¼ Modeling/Simulation;
*CM ¼Composition/Morphology; *TR ¼Transmission/Reflection; *CE ¼Cost/Economics; *MC ¼ Mitigation/Cleaning; *A ¼ ambient conditions/effects; *I¼ Instrumentation, *S ¼ spectral effects, *TO¼ Tilt/Orientation.

Publication Source Focus* (see Location [Duration] Solar Device Type Key Findings Comments/Other Conditions
code below)

Abrams et al. (2014) P,TR, MC 12 field stations across the USA [1 Si (module glass) Report of robust dual-function anti-reflective and anti-soiling coating Installations by Sun Edison
year] that is hydrophobic and self-cleaning Procedures on preparation of glass
included
Amarnadh et al. (2014) P, TR, TO, A Vellore, India (Southeast India) [1 Monocrystalline and Poly- Orientation (,) of module data. Temperature, humidity, and solar irra-
month] crystalline Si Modules; Glass Efficiency vs. days of exposure; dust density vs. days of exposure diance data provide.
Plates Transmission of test plates reported vs. dust coverage; Function of tilt.
Al-Jawah et al. (2014) MS, MC Hypothetical 1-MW PV Plant in PV Development, testing, and evaluation of a framework to assist inves- Questionnaire developed for experts to
(Dissertation) Saudi Arabia tors in photovoltaic (PV) power plants in dust-prone and arid regions rate the degree of their agreement or
make informed decisions regarding selection among PV panel cleaning disagreement on a Likert scale. Average
alternatives. results indicate agreement that the

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
Multi-criteria decision method (MCDM) used to select among cleaning study can improve selection among PV
alternatives in light of competing criteria. panel cleaning alternatives.
Anshir Bashir et al. P, A, TO Taxila, Pakistan [Winter Months- a-Si (single junction), single- Some review of past performance reports associating performance Mono- and polycrystalline modules:
(2014) January - March] crystal & multicrystalline Si with dust accumulation. Better performance in high-irradiance
modules Indications that soiling lowers the module operating temperature. condition with lower power output at
Discussion of tilt, humidity, and wind effects. low irradiance.
Amorphous Si: Good performance in low
irradiance (better light absorption)
Boyle et al. (2014) TR, A, CM Colorado Glass Cover Plates Airborne concentrations of particles (smaller than 10 mm) are collected Purpose for future modeling and dust
simultaneously dust accumulated on PV glass cover plates. accumulation interpretations.
Differences reported; effects of wind velocity.
Burton and King P, TR, CM Laboratory Studies (standardized Multicrystalline Si Cells Laboratory techniques to apply (simulated) soil to a specimen with Aim at correlating laboratory studies
(2014a) soil testing) quantification of results of the film on the transmission of incident with outdoor results and mitigation of
light. soiling effects.
Artificial soil is used and applied by aerosol spray device.
Transmission performance loss due to deposited soil is predicted over
a range of mass loadings.
Demonstration that the composition (NIST traceable) of the blend,
(termed “standard grime” by the authors) had a significant and
reproducible influence on measured performance loss.
Burton and King P, CM, S Laboratory Studies PV glass coupons Spectral loss due to the color profile (spectral effects) of the accumu- Focus on laboratory studies that can link
(2014b) lated soiling material investigated. with outdoor soiling results and effects
Use mixtures of previously reported “standard grime” with common of spectral content and relationships to
mineral pigments (Fe2O3 and göthite). “color” effects of soils.
Results show: Soils rich in red pigments (Fe2O3) - greater integrated
response than göthite containing soils rich in yellow pigment.
The yellow soils caused a greater attenuation in 300-450 nm spectrum
region and can have significant implications to specific devices (e.g.,
CdTe and mutlicrystalline Si technologies).
Burton and King I, TR, MC Laboratory Studies Glass Cover Sheets Expansion of earlier technique to measure the optical losses due to an Interesting observations and analysis
(2014c) artificially applied dust film. about ensuring that the losses due to soil
Sprayed artificial soil (described in paper). accumulation are outside the instru-
1 gm/m2 determined to be the limit of mass sensitivity to changing mental error.
reflection characteristics (about same as a daily observed soil accu- Also, importance to CPV of these parti-
mulation) cular studies are stressed.
Linear decreases observed between 1 gm/m2 and 5 gm/m2
Cano et al. (2014) P, CM, A, TO, Mesa, Arizona USA [3-month Crystalline Si Reference Cell Investigations of the interrelationships among soiling loss, terrain of Detailed discussions, descriptions, and
I Janurary through March period] Coupons the installation, tilt angle, rain frequency/intensity. applications of developed test station.
Design and development of inexpensive soiling station which evaluates Computations of the solar irradiance
soiling loss at different tilt angles (0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, 23°, 30°, 33°, 40°). performed.
Hot-dry climate results: the 0° tilt angle showed a 2.02% loss whereas 23°
and 33° showed soiling loss close to 1% (during the first 3 months of 2011).

41
42
Table 3 (continued )

Publication Source Focus* (see Location [Duration] Solar Device Type Key Findings Comments/Other Conditions
code below)

Chamaria et al. (2014) MS Laboratory Simulation and Model- 50 kW c-Si System Loss modeled and calculated in terms of kWh. Modeling and simulation of this 50kW
ing India Low latitudes having medium dust density should also have daily system in India.
cleaning due to lower tilt angle and higher dust deposition. Discussions of critical impact factors for
Less of a problem in higher latitude regions. dust loss for PV panels.
Cristaldi et al. (2014) I, P, A, M Milan, Italy and Laboratory Studies Commercial Si module Development of a (simple) method to evaluate dust on the perfor- Good discussion of techniques and lim-
mance of PV modules. itations
Estimates reduction in PV performance. Computations of the solar irradiance
Accuracy/errors of measurements/technique evaluated. performed.
System includes pyramometer and PV module. Method differentiates between dust
issues and other module ageing
problems.

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
Fernández-Garcia et al. MC, TR Spain CSP Outdoor exposure of solar reflectors and applying different cleaning Interesting investigation of a variety of
(2014) methods. cleaning processes for reflectors.
Most effective cleaning method is using demineralized water and a
brush, with an average efficiency of 98.8 % in rainy periods and 97.2 %
in dry seasons.
Innovative cleaning method based on a steam device with a soft tissue
was inefficient (efficiency of 97.3 % in a rainy period).
Ghosh and Ghosh P,MS,MC India PV Evaluation of the effects of dust adherence to module surface on effi- Description of cell and system operation.
(2015) ciency.
Modeling of the efficiency loss (Power, IV characteristics, irradiance)
Evaluation of mitigation approaches (coatings, cleaning)
Gostein et al. (2014) P, MC Desert Southwest USA, Arabian Thin-Film CdTe Power Plants Discussion on correct data collection methods. Soiling Ration (SR) utilized.
Peninsula, Western Australia Soiling levels correlated with PV power plant performance. Identified soiling as “3rd most significant
[Annual Data] Discussions of measurement precision, non-uniformity soiling issues, factor affecting PV power plant perfor-
& rainfall required for performance recovery. mance”—after irradiance and
temperature.
Griffith et al. (2014) P South Africa [  1 year] CSP Mirrors Candidate CSP site cleanliness assessment using dust collection buck- Reflectivity loss (soiling) measured on a
ets and loss of reflectivity on mirror samples installed at the site. monthly cycle using a specially designed
Instrumentation design presented. portable imaging-instrument.
this purpose.
Herrmann et al. MS, A Laboratory Studies General GIS Analysis for Dust Use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to model the soiling Contribution to the development of
(2014b) Risks at Geo Locations potentials in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries. appropriate indoor durability testing
Major result: Dust risk map of the MENA region, showing significant procedures and the identification of the
differentiation of soiling potentials. most favorable solar locations.
Herrmann et al. MS, A Focus on MENA region PV Discussions of parameters and events controlling soiling. Preliminary but important modeling
(2014a) Modeling of soiling (influences of climate conditions and collector directions.
characteristics). Discussions of soiling conditions, con-
Global soiling rates estimated by GIS. trolling environments, etc.
MENA information.
Hunter et al. (2014) MC Southwest U.S. Laboratory Studies CSP mirrors and heliostats Development and discussion of low cost, easy to apply anti-soiling Coatings have excellent SH properties
coatings based on superhydrophobic (SH) functionalized nano-silica with water contact angles 4165° and
materials and polymer binders that mitigate dust adhesion problems rolling angles o5°.
and significantly reducing mirror cleaning costs/facility downtime
Iberraken (2014) P, A Sahara Desert (Maghreb Countries, Crystalline Si Modules Effects of fine dust, dust wind, & sandstorms on the PV I-V character- Extensive report on reliability issues in
primarily Algeria) istics reported. these harsh, desert climates (e.g., EVA
discoloration).
John et al. (2014b) P, TO, MS Arizona Crystalline Si Modules from Tilt evaluations (angle-of-incidence-AOI) and effects. Performed on specially developed tilt
Field PV modules retrieved from the field that had different dust densities fixtures for precise evaluations.
have been measured for the dependence of the AOI curves on the dust
gravimetric densities.
Measured AOI curves were fitted and validated with the analytical/
empirical models (literature reports).
John et al. (2014a) P, TR, S, CM Mesa, Arizona USA [1.5 years] Crystalline Si Modules Spectral reflectance and quantum efficiency changes at various wave- Various dust layer thickness studies for
lengths for dust accumulations. spectral changes/effect.
Heavily soiled solar cell (  74.6gm/m2): very high reflectance loss and
very low quantum efficiency at all wavelengths (measured vs cleaned
panel).
Examined 3-soiled solar cells cleaned using 3 different cleaning tech-
niques - 60psi compressed air clean, brush assisted 30psi compressed
air clean and water cleaned. Short circuit current, spectral reflectance's
and quantum efficiency's dependence on wavelengths is reported
before and after each cleaning steps
Kazem et al. (2014a) P, TR Iraq (outdoor) [1 year] Crystalline Si Modules Compares the energy performance of four identical PV-panels with 20 Climatic and weather conditions
watt power; one cleaned daily, one weekly, and one uncleaned. by included.
using Solmetric PV Analyzer for a period of Efficiency of panels
determined: significant decrease in the relative conversion efficiency
which was ( 7.9%, 20%, 27%) for the weekly cleaned, monthly cleaned
and seasonally cleaned panels respectively relative to daily cleaned

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
panel and the reduction in average performance factor was ( 5.7 , 12.6
,17.2 ) for weekly cleaned, monthly cleaned and seasonally cleaned
panels respectively.
Kazmerski et al. (2014) P, MC MENA and India [4 1 year] Crystalline Si primarily; Some Microanalysis of the chemistry and morphology of dust particles from Indications and evaluation of cementi-
CdTe thin film these desert regions. tious-layer formations due to moisture.
Scanning of individual grains for composition.
Effectiveness of dust mitigation coatings (from Saudi Arabia mea-
surements)
Overview of ongoing and past research.
Ketjoy and Kony (2014) P,MS Thailand [5-month perio] Mono- and Multi-crystalline Approach: 40 W of amorphous silicon, 75 W of monocrystalline silicon Modeling: relationship between the
u and Amorphous Si and 125 W of multicrystalline silicon; cleaned and exposed module accumulative dust on photovoltaic
from each group. module and electrical energy output of
Dust accumulation measured by dust-fall jar methods. PV module
The quantity of dust on PV module 55 mg/m2.d, 260 mg/m2.d and 425
mg/m2 effect to decrease solar radiation of 3.71 %, 11.15 % and also
effect to decrease electrical energy output from PV module of; 3.50 % of
amorphous silicon when quantity of dust is equal to 260 mg and 7.28 %
when quantity of dust is equal to 425 mg, 2.96 % of mono crystalline
silicon when quantity of dust is equal to 260 mg and 5.79 % when
quantity of dust is equal to 425 mg and 2.83 % of multi crystalline
silicon when quantity of dust is equal to 260 mg and 6.03 % when
quantity of dust is equal to 425 mg.
Khonkar et al. (2014) P, MC, CE Saudi Arabia Desert Conditions CPV arrays ( 41000x Differences between CPV (high conc.) and flat-plate PV. Study indicates need for further model-
concentration) Dust 5-times greater effect on these CPV than flat-plate PV. ing.
I-V characteristics monitored to determine soiling effects. Questions on cost-effectiveness of
Current cleaning procedures discussed for these CPV cleaning in desert regions.
Kumar and Kaur (2014) P China [  1 year] PV general Impact: blocking transmission of sunlight, increasing of temperature of Discussions of general reliability issues
the and surface corrosion (due to chemical nature of the dust). and operation of PV cells/systems
Leloux et al. (2014) P, M High DNI Regions CSV Bankability issues relating to soiling, dust, climate, performance DNI and environmental conditions
Lombardo et al. (2014) P, MC Various European Locations Glass Materials in the Built Examination of rural, urban, and industrial environments for particu- Extensive chemical analysis.
Environment late matter deposited on glass. Indications for solar panel issues
The formation of the deposit at the glass surface is a quite complex (including possible ageing)
phenomenon controlled by the deposition of both gaseous and or
particulate matter– complex reactions taking place before (in the
atmosphere), during and after the deposition (at the glass surface)
Lorenz et al. (2014) P, MS, CE Laboratory Simulations Module Cover Glass Sheets Evaluation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic dust mitigation coatings. Detailed modeling results for “dry years”
Gains of 43% over uncoated surfaces (transmittance) and “wet years”
Cost simulations and modeling based on lab simulations of dust cov-
erage (with and without mitigation coatings)
Lorenzo et al. (2014) P Southeast Spain 2-MW PV Plant Non-uniform dust deposits lead to more than the short-circuit current Non uniform temperature distributions
reduction resulting from transmittance losses. When the affected PV result from the “shading” effects of the
modules are in a string together with other cleaned (or less dusty) non-uniform dust distribution—‘hot
ones, operation voltage losses arise-leading to power losses. spots’

43
44
Table 3 (continued )

Publication Source Focus* (see Location [Duration] Solar Device Type Key Findings Comments/Other Conditions
code below)

Maghami et al. (2014) MC Malaysia, Industrial Area Si Modules Identified industry-source dust on panel surface: siliceous, alumina Also, highway (traffic) pollutants and
and cement identified by EDX bird droppings.
Impurity distributions on particle surfaces (maps of dust samples) Elemental identifications
Mallineni et al. (2014) P, A, TO Arizona 4-16 year-old PV Power Plants Soiling losses in hot-dry climate zone. Excellent basis from reliability observa-
Soiling losses in 4-PV power plants with two different surroundings tions on these installations.
(urban and rural) and 3-different installation types (ground mount -
fixed tilt, 1-axis tracking and rooftop - fixed tilt)
Major Results: Site 3 (Glendale, Arizona) - rural, 1-axis tracking, 12 years,
6.9% soiling loss; Site 4b (Mesa, Arizona) - urban, horizontal tilt (ground),
16 years, 11.1% soiling loss; Site 4c (Mesa, Arizona) - urban, 1-axis

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
tracking, 4 years, 5.5% soiling loss; Site 6 (Tempe, Arizona) - urban, 5o
fixed tilt (rooftop), 8 years, 3.8% soiling loss.
Mazumder et al. (2014) P, I, TR, CM Laboratory Studies Electrodynamic Screen Systems Report on transparent electrodynamic screens (EDS) and their appli- Very detailed description of technique,
for PV (and CSP) cations for self-cleaning operation of solar mirrors - primary focus on use, limitations, and effectiveness.
the removal dust particles o 30-mm diameter while maintaining
specular reflection efficiency o 90%.
Focus: (1) loss of specular reflection efficiency as a function of particle
size distribution of deposited dust, and (2) the effects of the electrode
design and materials used for minimizing initial loss of specular
reflectivity in producing EDS-integrated solar mirrors.
Mejia et al. (2014) P, I San Diego, CA USA [  3 months Large PV (86.4 KW) System Large PV system: Soiling losses were found to be 0.21% Correlated with weather station data
summer] per day, with an observed efficiency decrease from 7.2% to 5.6% during located about 3.4 Km from site.
a 108 day dry period (summer). Good irradiance correlations.
Following this observation, rain event restored most of the lost effi-
ciency to 7.1%.
Ndiaye et al. (2014) P Dakar, Senegal Multi- and Monocrystalline Si Pmax loss from 18 to 78% respectively for the polycrystalline module Exposure times (dust accumulation)
Modules (pc-Si) and monocrystalline module (mc-si). Imax loss from 23 to 80% FF also monitored.
respectively pc-Si and mc-Si modules.
Vmax and Voc are not affected by dust accumulation for both
technologies.
Naeem (2014) P,MC Metro Phoenix, Arizona USA Si Modules Two studies that focus on investigating the soiling effect on the per- 5 cities in Phoenix area considered.
formance of the PV modules: Good description of experimental setup.
(1) investigate the optimum cleaning frequency for cleaning PV mod-
ules installed in Mesa, AZ
(2) evaluating the soiling loss in different locations of Metro Phoenix
area of Arizona, to validate the daily soiling rate obtained from the
mock rooftop setup
Soiling rates: (1) -0.061% for 20° tilt, and (2) -0.057 to -0.85% for 13-28°
tilt.
Pape et al. (2014) P, ME, MC Spain [Cleaning 3-26 day periods] CSP systems (solar resource Effects of dust on irradiance affecting solar thermal plant performance Very useful discussions of solar resource
monitoring systems) and monitoring systems. monitoring equipment under various
Soiling characteristics of the rotating shadow band pyranometers environmental conditions.
compared to pyroheliometers. Correction algorithms to improve the
The pyroheliometer suffered of linearly growing errors of up to 30% accuracy of the RSP sensors explained
after one month, the soiling impact on the rotating shadow band and presented.
device generally stayed below 2%, without any visible trend of growing Instrument cleaning evaluated.
errors
Polizos et al. (2014a) MC Coatings (Laboratory Studies) CSP Transparent superhydrophobic (SH) coatings based on multifunctional Promising long-life coatings for CSP
silica nanoparticles and polymeric binders developed and evaluated. applications and PV as well
Key findings:
 The optical clarity of the coatings. The particles (average size smaller
than 200 nm ) were uniformly dispersed in organic binders and
resulted in coatings with an average roughness value smaller than 30
nm. The nano-particles do not scatter light at wavelengths 4 250 nm
because of their small dimensions.
 Enhanced particle binder interfaces with
 multifunctional configuration significantly improves the abrasion resis-
tance of the coatings without degrading their SH properties.
 Accelerated weathering durability (UV exposure). Indications that
the coatings are environmentally durable over several years of
simulated UVA exposure.
Polizos et al. (2014b) MC Laboratory Studies Coating Development  Method for fabricating scalable and cost-effective superhydrophobic Potential application for dust mitigation/
coatings. protection for modules
 Chemical modification of diatomaceous earth nanostructured
particles.
 Abrasive resistance depends on the size and geometry of the dia-
tomaceous earth (potential for long life).
Qasem et al. (2014) P, TO, S, TR Laboratory Studies (comparisons to Amorphous Si, CIGS, CdTe, and PV performance and cover glass transmittance measurements. Extensive correlations among dust den-
Kuwait data) Crystalline Si Modules (and Experiments as functions of tilt angle. sity, light transmission, and performance
glass sheets) Demonstration of relationship between dust density and light trans- degradation.

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
mittance (through glass) for dust below  19mg/cm2. Chemical and physical data of dust used
Higher-bandgap technologies (e.g., a-Si) more affected because of in these studies.
spectral response than lower bandgap (e.g., c-Si)
Rao et al. (2014) P Bangaluru, India (Laboratory and Si PV modules Effect of outdoor exposure (dust) on I-V characteristics Extensive I-V measurements and com-
Outdoor Testing) Indoor simulations parisons between outdoor and labora-
Isc is sensitive to measuring dust-induced losses (from both indoor and tory (controlled conditions)
outdoor measurements) measurements.
Sakhuja et al. (2014) TR, MC, CM Singapore [3 months] Si Modules (glass surfaces) Development, production, and testing of self-cleaning nanostructured Durability results promising for these
glasses for mitigation. nanostructured layers.
Results: Loss of 2% in efficiency for planar glass packaged solar mod-
ule; and loss of 0.3% in efficiency for nanostructured glass packaged
solar module.
Sansom et al. (2014) P, MC Laboratory Studies CSP (polymer and glass covers) Comparisons of the optical properties and surface texture of glass and Measurements: specular and hemi-
polymer film collectors for concentrating applications. spherical reflectance, surface roughness,
Degradation of glass and polymer reflecting surfaces with sand and and electron microscopy.
dust abrasion. Results interesting for CPV as well.
Anti-soiling and self-cleaning coatings tested on glass and polymer Cleaning processes.
film collector surfaces
Said and Walwil (2014) P, MC, TR, A Dhahran, Saudi Arabia [45 days] Module glass covers and PV Effects of dust deposition of PV performance and cover glass trans- Interesting and novel AFM studies of
panels mission. adhesive forces (fundamental studies of
ARC glass effects (indicated reduction in soiling) adhesion).
Higher particle size—higher adhesion forces Extensive studies of composition.
Effects of moisture on enhanced adhesion
20% reduction in power output (5 gm2 dust accumulation) after 45
days exposure
Sayyah et al. (2014) P Laboratory Studies (Electro- PV modules  Database reported for soiling losses in different parts of the world. Detailed overview of electrodynamic
dynamic Screens)  Environmental and design parameters of dust deposition discussed screen effectiveness and use.
and evaluated.
 Laboratory, outdoor, and predictive soiling studies.
 Emerging method of electrodynamic screen for dust removal
introduced and evaluated
Schaeffer et al. (2014b) MC Laboratory (superhydrophobic) Solar anti-soiling coatings Simple, durable spray-on SH coating based on functionalized SiO See also paper Schaeffer et al. (2014a).
nanoparticles that can easily be applied to surfaces (e.g., optical sen-
sors, photovoltaics, sights and lenses, textiles, construction materials,
and electronic devices.
Durability and mechanical properties reported.
Schaeffer et al. (2014c) MC, ME Laboratory (superhydrophobic) Solar anti-soiling coatings Development of silica nanoparticle-based nano-coatings that can be Contact angles, morphology, etc. repor-
(large area) applied to large surface areas (modules). ted.
Focus on transparency between 400 nm and 800 nm. Modeling of coatings
Semaoui et al. (2014) P Algeria ( Southern desert) Si Modules Dust accumulation over several months, with average loss of 4.38%/ Ghardaia region, 600 km south of Algiers
month
Sharma et al. (2014) P, A Gurgaon, India [4 28 months] HIT and multicrystalline Si Reliability and performance of HIT and multicrystalline Si modules Wide-ranging investigations of the per-
Modules under operating conditions, including soiling. formance of two module technologies

45
46
Table 3 (continued )

Publication Source Focus* (see Location [Duration] Solar Device Type Key Findings Comments/Other Conditions
code below)

All tested modules had observed soiling issues. under operating conditions at the SERC
Enhanced soiling effects at module edges (mounting points) (now NISE) test facility near New Delhi.
Sibai (2014) P,MS Saudi Arabia (hot dry desert) Modeling of PV module Mathematical model for series-parallel photovoltaic modules, evaluate Modeling for general hot climate condi-
performancee the model, and present the I-V and P-V characteristic plots for various tions—with additional analysis for dust
temperatures, irradiance, and diode ideality factors – dust
considerations.
Sinha et al. (2014) P, A Various Si technologies Atmospheric variables considered: temperature, humidity, aerosols, Temperature and humidity effects
clouds, soiling, and snowfall, for arid versus temperate regions, with received special attention.
specific comparison of the U.S. Southwest and Saudi Arabia with the U.
S. Southeast and Ontario, Canada.
Specific dust/snow results: -3% for soiling with cleaning, and 0 to o ;-
5% for snowfall

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
Smith et al. (2014) P Laboratory and Outdoor Testing Crystalline Si Modules Flowing water system investigated to improve PV module perfor- Focus on temperature and irradiance
mance, including the avoidance of soiling. benefits for improvements in
performance.
Stark et al. (2014) P,TR Laboratory Experiments, Modeling CSP Investigation of the application of electrodynamic screens for “efficient Modeling, ray tracing
and cost-effective” dust removal from CSP mirrors Specular reflectivity measured inside
Prototype mirrors constructed and evaluated weather chamber
Incorporation of transparent EDS causes an initial loss of 3% but would
be able to maintain specular reflectivity more than 90% to meet the
industrial requirement for CSP plants
Sulaiman et al. (2014) P, I Laboratory Testing (controlled Crystalline Si Focus: dust, water, sand and moss on the surface of solar photovoltaic Cleaning requirements discussed.
conditions) panel: Primarily development of experimental system for controlled
observations.
Up to 86% loss in performance reported.
Tan, et al. (2014) MS, MC Indoor issues with dust and Indoor surfaces (general) Air-conditioned environments (emphasis) for these indoor studies of Some focus on health issues, but studies
surfaces dust adhesion to various surfaces. of science interest to dust and soiling for
Interrelationships of dust adhesion with degree of surface roughness. PV
Modeling using van de Waals forces.
Toivola, et al. (2014) P Arizona, Florida, Ohio-USA [Multi- CIGS Modules Outdoor testing for reliability of Miasolé thin-film CIGS modules. Product reliability investigation for thin
year outdoor testing] Testing conditions and apparatus described; data shows soiling effects. film CIGS product.
Weber et al. (2014) A, P, MC, I Laboratory Studies Si Modules Development of soiling and abrasion tests for PV module surfaces. Test procedure key to determining the
Beneficial effects of anti-soiling coatings demonstrated (anti abrasive service lifetime of module glass and
and soil mitigation) coatings (dust mitigation, antireflection,
Cleaning procedures discussed/demonstrated-including impact of etc.) under soiling conditions.
cleaning on surface
Abrasive tests and instrumentation designed and tested
Wolfert-stetter et al. I, P General Locations Metrology Stations Effect of dust on MHP monitoring stations. Dust observations on the effects on
(2014) Pyrheliometers extremely sensitive to dust (DNI). Reductions of mea- monitoring equipment.
sured DNI values exceeding 25% in only a few weeks are common.
Methods to improve examined, the soiling level of each individual
sensor can be determined by following a special sequence of sensor
cleaning and brief breaks combined with a close examination of the
sensor responses.
Wu et al. (2014) MD Laboratory Studies ITO Electrodes on Glass (Elec- ITO (transparent) electrons deposited in “forked” pattern on a glass First of two studies (other in 2015 that
tro-dynamic) substrate to electrodynamically mitigate dust issues. improves on this approach)
Report of 95% effective.

*P ¼Performance, *MS¼ Modeling/Simulation; *CM ¼ Composition/Morphology; *TR¼ Transmission/Reflection; *CE ¼ Cost/Economics; *MC ¼Mitigation/Cleaning; *A ¼ ambient conditions/effects; *I ¼Instrumentation; *S ¼Spectral
Effects; TO ¼ Tilt/Orientation.
Table 4
Summary of dust and soiling papers in 2015 indicating primary focus, device/materials investigate, conditions and findings. The Focus Code (for primary contributions) is: *P ¼ Performance, *MS¼ Modeling/Simulation;
*CM ¼Composition/Morphology; *TR ¼Transmission/Reflection; *CE ¼Cost/Economics; *MC ¼ Mitigation/Cleaning/Maintenance; *A ¼ ambient conditions/effects; *I ¼Instrumentation, *S¼ spectral effects, *TO¼ Tilt/Orientation.

Publication Source Focus Location [Duration] Solar Device Type Key Findings Comments/Other Conditions
Code*

Alami Merrouni et al. TR, MC Morocco (Eastern) [3 months] Solar Mirrors (CSP) First reporting of the effect of dust on different solar mirror Detailed analysis of the cleanliness of the mirror
(2015) materials in Morocco. materials under the outdoor exposure conditions.
For glass and aluminum mirror materials, the” drop on
cleanliness per time interval” was same for all the mirrors
(over all the test periods).
Highest average cleanliness drop per month for the hor-
izontal mirrors was 45 % and 33 % for the glass and alu-
minum mirrors
The þ45° mirrors are less effective with a cleanliness drop
of about 14 % for both reflectors.

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
Mirrors installed on the 0° and -45° angles remained
cleaner with a cleanliness average of about 97 % for both
mirrors
Ali et al. (2015) P Taxila, Pakistan [3-4 month] Si PV Modules (single and poly) Two modules of each type exposed for 3 months in winter Decrease of module efficiency (clean - dirty) in case of
timeframe. monocrystalline and polycrystalline module was
Monocrystalline and polycrystalline modules showed 3.55% and 3.01%, respectively
about 20% and 16% decrease of average output power
respectively compared to the clean modules.
Loss of output power and module efficiency in mono-
crystalline module was more compared to the poly-
crystalline module
Alnaser et al. (2015) P, MC, Bahrain [  6 months] Crystalline Si 500-kWp Array Density of accumulated dust ranged from 5‐12 g/m2 with Interesting study and discussions of the 8 of 2088
CM an average PV power loss up to 40% of maximum available. panels in array.
Compositional analysis: Si (  15%) and Ca (  15%) in Detailed explanation of performance of this large
addition to Al (  6%), Mg (  5%), and Fe (  5%). array with micro inverters (individual for each panel)
Modeling with result of prediction (equation) of loss in Some discussion of cleaning.
transmission with dust accumulation. Energy management discussions.
Alqatari et al. (2015) M, P, MC Saudi Arabia Modeling of dust mitigation in Case study: modeling for dust mitigation in Saudi Arabia Modeling uses Saudi Arabia as a test case for validity.
Saudi Arabia (large-scale PV)
Spatiotemporal model analyzes atmospheric dust in the
simulation of PV system performance in KSA.
Modeling and analysis also considers dust mitigation,
allowing for optimizing choice of self-cleaning
technology at a particular time and location (aimed at
recovering losses due to the soiling)
Al Saluos (2015) P,CM Jordan, Laboratory Studies Crystalline Si Modules Module parameters (Voc, Jsc, Pm) as a function of dust Reduction in system efficiency reported.
depositions showing power losses of 90%.
Investigation of dust characteristics
Bashker and Arya P, India PV Panels (Si) Accumulated dust on the surface of PV solar panel can Specific for India.
(2015) decreases the PV system’s overall efficiency up to 35% per Discussions of maintenance.
month.
Performance of PV panes is studied experimentally and
used in calculating the effect of deposited dust on the
energy efficiency of PV systems.
Benatiallah et al. P, A Sahara Areas Crystalline Si Modules Interrelated dust and wind effects on the electrical per- Abstract of studies
(2015) formance of modules
Bhattacharya et al. P, MC Tripura, India [  6 months] 2-identical 37-W crystalline Si Reduction of Voc, Isc, and efficiency reported (ranging from Data on Isc and Voc as function of irradiance level.
(2015) modules 9% to 13% loss in efficiency for 6 month duration. Cleaning recommended.
One module cleaned other left for exposure.
Bohra et. Al (2015) P Bangalore, India Urban environ- Rooftop PV 4 technologies: Poly-Si, Mono-Si, HIT, and CdTe thin film Metropolitan areas considered for dust effects on PV
ments [1-month] studied (for suitability in the urban environment). performance
CdTe had highese soiling lossis (10.88%) after one-week Rooftop installations for these studies.
and Poly-Si the least (4.21%).

47
48
Table 4 (continued )

Publication Source Focus Location [Duration] Solar Device Type Key Findings Comments/Other Conditions
Code*

Boppana (2015) P, M Arizona USA PV Power Plants (Si and CdTe) Outdoor characterization of dust on two power plants 18 and 19-year old power plants analyzed.
located in cold, dry climate. Frameless and framed modules compared
Statistical risk analysis for power plant through failure
mode, effect, and criticality analysis based on non-
destructive field techniques and count data of the failure
modes.
Bouaddi and Ihlal P, TR Southwest Morocco CSP Mirrors Evaluation of the rate of soiling of exposed solar mirrors by Agadir, Southwest Morocco (30°26'3.8"N 9°29'31.1"
(2015) performing extensive reflectance measurements every 3-4 W), a site isolated from urban pollution and industrial
days activity.
Results: summer period (dry with predominant wind from Weather data provided.
Northeast) the cleanliness of the mirrors has dropped sig-

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
nificantly: average monthly cleanliness is 69%, 68%, 76% for
glass mirrors, and 76%, 74% , 72% for first type Al mirrors
measured respectively in July, August, and September.
Bouchalkha (2015) MS, MC Modeling for Solar PV Panelsin Abu PV Light scattering calculations from dust particles using the Detailed layer-by-layer modeling to calculate dust
Dhabi T-matrix model to estimate the effect of dust accumulation effects on transmitted light.
on the module surface
Results: 10% reduction in module output after few days.
Conclusion: Cleaning every 10-15 days (under normal Abu
Dhabi ambient conditions)
Boyle et al. (2015) P Colorado USA (2-Front Range Loca- PV Glass Cover Plates Mass accumulation rates between 1 and 50 mg/m2/day Uncertainties in the measurements evaluated and
tions) [1-5 weeks] were observed (with variations over the year, location, and discussed.
tilt angle). Semi-arid area.
Total mass accumulations up to 2 g/m2 for 1-5 week per-
iod, with transmissions losses to 11%.
Transmission was a linear function of the mass of the dust
accumulation (and not a function of the tilt or location)—
with reduction of  4.1% for every g/m2 accumulation.
Brophy et al. (2015) P, MC Field and Laboratory Studies PV modules Field performance of anti-soiling coatings on PV modules Hydrophobic, low surface energy coatings
Local conditions (climate zone) are critical to performance Dual purpose (also ARC)
of the coatings. Two years date in field
Tests on “robust dual-function antireflective and anti-soil-
ing coating that is dense, homogeneous and intrinsically
hydrophobic.”
Hydrophobic coatings have strongest anti dust adhesion
properties
Burton et al. (2015a) TR, MC Laboratory Studies Module Glass Coupons Objective: Low mass loadings of soil of PV module surfaces Collected field-soil samples analyzed to develop a
are common but difficult to quantify. compositional analog for lab studies.
Synthetic soil analog was sprayed onto glass coupons at
with a high-volume, low-pressure pneumatic sprayer.
A 0.1-g/m2 soil loading determined to be the limit of mass
measurement sensitivity (similar to some reports of daily
soil accumulation).
Burton et al. (2015b) TR, MS, P Laboratory Studies High-Concentration PV Systems Modeling of the performance of 3-junction concentrator Transmission changes evaluated on glass coupons.
(CPV) cell systems to various color pigments mixed in naturally Modeling of effects of these different soils on the solar
occurring soils (spectral response changes). spectrum.
Wide changes in the responses (transmission) with differ-
ent soils shown to be important for these CPV technologies.
Major effect on altering the current balance between the
top and middle cells in the 3-cell structure, especially with
“yellow” pigmented soils.
Cáceres et al (2015) CE Santiago, Chile PV Economic study of PV installations for residential PV in PM-10 considerations
Santiago, Chile. Effects of dust on panel performance and
on the LCOE for on-grid and off-grid.
Cekirge and Elhassan P General CSP (Towers and Parabolic Modeling of tower and trough systems for viability and Good system comparisons
(2015) Troughs) operation
Small discussion of dust effects and potential impacts
Chakraborty and P Coal City, India Mono-Si, HIT, Poly-Si, Micro- “Technical mapping of PV” Environmental conditions include soiling.
Sadhu (2015) morph, a-Si:H, CIGS, CdTe A-Si:H modules perform better under the typical tem- Technology comparisons.
Modules perature variant and dry environmental condition of the
Coal City of India
Choi et al. (2015) MC Development of dust prevention Dust mitigation coatings Superhydrophobic coatings with high haze (micro- Optoelectronic applications of these anti dust coating
coatings (laboratory) structured films) is the intent.
Studied gradient-index (n) material-based microstructures,
i.e., magnesium fluoride (MgF2, n  1.37) film-coated SU8
ultraviolet curable polymer (n  1.59) microcones (MCs)
with tapered architectures, on silicon (Si, n  3.9) sub-
strates
Some report of antireflection properties of layers
Doumane et al. (2015) MS Laboratory Si PV Module modeled by an equivalent electrical circuit (com- Extensive electrical engineering treatment of the
ponents have time-dependent characteristics determined module (circuit approach)

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
under accelerated tests).
Optical transmission loss leads to as much as a 11.5% over
25 years.
Ferrada et al. (2015) P Chile (coastal desert zone) [16 mc-Si and crystalline Si modules Difference of energy yield between the technologies larger Studies include uncertainty analysis.
months] for summer and smaller for winter.
Performance ratio decreased due to the dust accumulation
between  0.04%/day up to  0.13%/day (positive ambient
temperature gradient), and between  0.13%/day up to
 0.18%/day (negative ambient temperature gradient).
Fuentealba et al. P Atacama Desert, Chile [638 days] a-Si/mc-Si tandem cell and Multi- Thin-film module performance: Decreased due to the dust Coastal zone of Chile.
(2015) crystalline Si Modules accumulation at a rate from 4.2%-3.7%/month (decreasing Electricity rate costs reported for each technology—
temperature conditions) and from 4.8%-4.4%/month based on performance measurements.
(increasing temperature). Cleaning thin-film modules had better return on
Multicrystalline silicon module performance: Degradation electricity price than for cleaning the mc-Si
rates were 2.4%-1.8%/month (decreasing temperature), and technology.
6.2%-3.7%/month (increasing temperature).
Guo et al. (2015) P, MS Doha, Qatar [7 months] Si Modules in Test Field PV performance, ambient dust and weather conditions Very good discussion of conditions and of measure-
measured continuously from June 1 through December 31, ment approaches.
2014
Performance losses: 0.0042 þ/-0.0080 per day for modules
cleaned every sixth month, and 0.0045 þ/-0.0091 per day
for modules cleaned every second month, in terms of a
“cleanness index” based on the PV module’s temperature.
Modeling of dust performance.
Hacke et al.(2015) P, MC Laboratory Reliability links with dust/soiling Effects of module soiling on module glass surface resisting “Sea salt yielded a 3.5 orders of magnitude decrease in
and resulting potential induced degradation (PID) resistance on the glass surface when the RH was
Compared 3-soil types (Arizona road dust, soot, and sea salt) increased over this RH range. Arizona road dust
Variation in results for the soil type showed reduced sheet resistance at lower RH, but
PID correlation with resistance. with less humidity sensitivity over the range tested.
The soot sample did not show significant resistivity
change compared to the unsoiled control.”
Jasim et al. (2015) P,MC,CE Crystalline Si PV (cleaning Effects of dust on PV panel performance.
systems) Presents automated, closed-water cleaning system
Techno-economic analysis is provided
Jiang and Lu (2015) P,A Laboratory studies (Effect of module Monocrystalline Si Modules (156 Effects of temperature on dust accumulation on Si modules. “Most obvious temperature gradient” for the ther-
surface T on dust deposition) mm x 156 mm) Measured deposition densities of dust particles were found to mophoresis force was found to be lower than 40 C.
range from 0.50 mg/ m2-0.84 mg/m2.
Higher surface temperature modules has a lower density due
to the effect of thermophoresis force arising from the tem-
perature gradient between its surface and the surrounding air;
energy output ratios were found to increase from 0.947 to
0.971 with the increase of temperature gradient.

49
50
Table 4 (continued )

Publication Source Focus Location [Duration] Solar Device Type Key Findings Comments/Other Conditions
Code*

Jin et al. (2015) MS Modeling and experimental studies Modeling of nanoscale roughness General studies of colloidal- and nano-scale particles on This is a general paper on how particle are deposited
(Laboratory) effects on particle collection surfaces. on surface and how they interact with the surface.
Interesting look at surface roughness at the nanoscale and Mostly modeling—some experimental results.
the effect of adhesion.
Non-PV overall
John et al. (2015) P,S Laboratory Studies (India dust Si, CdTe, CIGS Controlled artificial dust (from various climate-zone loca- Excellent report on spectral effects (quantum effi-
samples from various locations) tions in India) deposition on module surfaces. ciency measurements on cells).
Example: Soiling loss on a Si cell with Mumbai dust (17.1%) “The dust collected from Mumbai showed highest
is about two times that of Jodhpur dust (9.8%) for the same spectral
soil gravimetric density of 3g/m2. loss, followed by Pondicherry, Agra, Hanle, Jodhpur
Spectral effects is highlighted by technology (Si, CIGS, and

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
CdTe)—corresponding to those bandgaps. Gurgaon. The worst affected module technology was
amorphous
silicon (17.7%) followed by cadmium telluride (15.7%),
crystalline silicon (15.4%) and CIGS (14.5%) for the
same
density (2.5g/m2) of dust from Mumbai”
Karim et al. (2015) A,S,TR Morocco CSP Exposed mirrors in natural aging sites present low loss in Ageing studies involving outdoor testing and labora-
reflectivity which doesn’t exceed 0.4% after 240 days of tory experiments.
outdoor exposure.
The effect of sand properties on erosion phenomenon was
found that the sand hardness affect the roughness para-
meters, while the sharp forms influence on the impacts
properties(roughness parameters, impacts number,
impacted area, impacts size diameter).
Increasing the sand particle's size also increases the
impacted area and the losses in relative specular
reflectivity.
Kawamoto and Shi- MC Laboratory Studies Si Modules Cleaning using electrostatic force to remove sand from the Power consumption  0.
bata (2015) surface of solar panels. Parallel wires embedded in cover glass plate.
Effectiveness: more than 90% of the adhering sand is
repelled from the surface of the slightly inclined panel after
the cleaning operation.
Kazmerski et al. P, MC Laboratory Studies of individual Module glass surfaces Chemical/compositional measurements of dust samples Studies of fundamental adhesion of single-dust par-
(2015) dust particles (from Middle East from various geographical locations. ticles to PV module glass surfaces.
and from Brasil) Adhesion measurement by AFM of individual soiling grains Cementation effects of moisture and from diesel fuel
on module glass surfaces indicating the relationship emissions indicated.
between particle surface chemistry and the adhesion. Samples from Saudi Arabia and Brasil.
Comparative measurements on glass and glass coated with
superhydrophobic and superhydrophilic films.
King (2015) P, MS Laboratory Simulations and Experi- PV module performance Derating of PV module performance for many factors, The advanced soiling portions of this report are
mental Studies including environmental ones such as soiling and dust. important and detailed.
Advanced Soiling Study determining the influence of soil Very good gathering of the influences sources and
composition and morphology on light attenuation and factors for soiling.
scattering.
Developed an improved modeling of angle-of-incidence
accounting for diffuse utilization and soiling
Validated a methodology to predict the string mismatch
“derate factor” from available module characterization
results (also relating to soiling)
Klimm et al. (2015) A,MC,TR Laboratory and Field Testing PV Module Glass Soiling and abrasion testing for harsh climates. Laboratory apparatus description for testing
Laboratory sand trickling test stand according to DIN 52 348.
Results of the outdoor and indoor tested material show the
strong influence of dust types and material properties on
soiling and durability of the surfaces.
Klugmann-Rad- P, MC, Gdansk, Poland (3 locations) Si PV Modules Linear relationship between the thickness of the soiling Module cleaning methods reported.
ziemska (2015) CM layer and the performance of the module (with reported Good background section providing foundation for
observation of 25.5%/mm loss in power for naturally these studies.
deposited dust).
Maximum observed daily loss of 0.8%.
Studies of morphology and chemistry of collected dust.
Lee et al. (2015) MC Taiwan CIGS Modules Development of a dust-monitoring platform system. WIKI site that is providing fast access to PV monitor-
CIGS modules monitored since 12/2012 ing results.
Daily soiling loss (up to 30%/month) reported and impact
on utility-scale plants and return-on-investment discussed
Leem et al. (2015) MC Laboratory Si mini-modules 2-dimensional periodic conical micrograting structured Fabrication procedures provided for the nanos-
(MGS) polymer films are studied for both “light harvest- tructured PET films.
ing”-ARC and self-cleaning for Si PV modules.
Careful and detailed experimental studies.
Leem and Yu (2015) MC Laboratory [Month] III-V solar cells Self-cleaning surfaces for III-V solar cell applications. Used GaAs cells with a cover glass
“Artificial inverted compound eye structured (ICESs)”
(polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) films with ARC and self-

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
cleaning functions for the enhancement of solar power
generation in encapsulated GaAs solar cells
Li et al. (2015a) MS, MC Modeling and simulation PV Modules Modeling and simulation of a device for the removal of Brush studies primarily
dust from module surfaces.
PV module light electrical parameters analyzed for various
directions of dust removal from the module.
Li et al. (2015b) MS, P Modeling of Performance PV Plant Electricity quality and performance modeling based upon Modeling that includes effects of shading (e.g., from
operating factors (including dust) dust)
Operating Statuses Identification (OSI)is utilized in the
simulation formulation.
Lim et al. (2015) MC, TR, P Laboratory Studies Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC) Hydrophobic polymers evaluated for dust mitigation and Studies of the degree of hydrophobicity of the surfaces
for antireflection properties for PV modules. of these films.
polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) patterned with negatively ARC-dust mitigation dual purpose.
tapered nanoholes (NHs) as a protective antireflection
layer of the external glass surface.
Lopes de Jesus et al. TR, MC, Laboratory Studies PV Module Glass Hydrophilic, transparency, and adhesion studies of TiO2 Self-cleaning attributes of these films reported.
(2015) CM /SiO2 composites containing different titanium content. Superhydrophilic coatings.
Contact angles near 0° obtained.
Abrasion and durability data provided.
Martinez-Plaza et al. P, MC Qatar PV (tracking, fixed) Results of outdoor exposure of a specific model of multi- Discussions of durability and cleaning requirements
(2015) crystalline silicon (mc-Si) photovoltaic (PV) modules after (detailed)
their first complete year of operation at STF.
Impact of module cleaning frequency, use of commercial
anti-soiling coatings and module mounting on either fixed,
one-axis-tracking or two-axis-tracking systems was
studied.
Martinez et al. (2015) P, MC Qatar Various PV technology perfor- Descripton of the Qatar Foundation test facility (testing PV The Qatar Foundation group has extensive facilities
mance evaluation for dust technologies most suited for the Qatar climate). and staffing for dust investigations.
situations Study examines several thin-film technologies for envir- Possible indications of the better performance of high
onmental conditions (including dust) Eg thin films in heat/dust
Michels et al. (2015) P,TO Paraná, Brasil Solarex MSX56 Si Modules Dust levels reduced electricity production (power) levels Mainly study of outdoor performance reliability
by approximately 16%.
Mondal and Bansal MC General PV Modules Cleaning of PV panels with specially designed robotic arm Cost effectiveness and versatility of the system is
(2015) (SPCRA) with 4-degrees of freedom. discussed.
Arm has 2 prismatic and 2 revolute joints; system has System design and operation is provided.
unique end effector with water sprinkler, air blower and Nice summary of various cleaning systems
wiper.
Negash and Tadiwose P,TO Ethiopia Si PV Modules (site of 10kW PV Soiling losses for eight different tilt angle (00, 250 tilt angle had a least insolation loss and largest
(2015) plant) 50,11.60,150,21.50,250,300 and 350) including the latitude of amount of energy absorbed
Bahir Dar City (11.60), Ethiopia
Nazar (2015) P, MC Discussions and Effects General PV Modules Improving the efficiency of panel by dust cleaning. Includes discussion of solar trackers
Robots, self-cleaning surfaces (electrodynamic screens,
robotic vacuum cleaners are discussed.

51
52
Table 4 (continued )

Publication Source Focus Location [Duration] Solar Device Type Key Findings Comments/Other Conditions
Code*

Naeem and Talizh- Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Correlations between climate zone (meteorological and Conference paper presentation that summarized use-
mani (2015) other) conditions and the dust conditions. ful information for Jeddah, KSA and similar climate
Requirements for local cleaning of PV module frequency zones.
and needs.
Modeling of dust conditions on performance over time.
Pettersen et al. (2015) P Nordic Climates Soiling/Snow on PV modules SPICE modeling. Cleaning in all cases provided better results than
Effects of panel orientation for snow and dust. coatings.
Experiments for dust on mini-modules with and without Snow especially critical for non-uniformity (shading)
anti-soiling coatings. issues.
Dry and wet cleaning of modules evaluated
Pettersen (2015) P, MS Modeling and Experiment (Various Si PV Module and Module Glass Model to predict and quantify the effects of partial shad- Results for snow depth reported.
Norway Conditions) [  1 year]

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
Masters Thesis ing (e.g., by dust) on PV module output using LTspiceIV. Extensive modeling results provided on shading
Experimental validation under Norway climatic conditions: effects.
reduction in transmission of 0.92% for untreated module
glass and 1.1% with anti-soiling coating (no effectiveness of
coating)-over 1 week.
Snow accumulations and effect on output also studied.
Penetta et al. (2015) P,TR Queensland, Australia CSP Reflectors Dust accumulation effects on CSP performance. Discussion of dust compromising mirror reflectivity.
Correlations among humidity, temperature, and dust
accumulation
Phinikarides et al. P, MS Cyprus [3-4 years] PV System Performance Seasonable variations, including those due to dust and Not significant focus on dust and soiling
(2015) PV (c-Si, CIGS, CdTe) soiling; estimated linear degradation rates
Seasonal variations varied by technology. Differences in
degradation rates reported by technology
Piotrowska-Woroniak P, MS Poland (Great Lakes Region) PV 264 Si panels [50.16 kW] Dust emissions modeled (kg/year) Indirect analysis of dust effects on performance
et al. (2015) [2012-2013] Analysis showed the installation resulted in reduction of
dust emissions into the atmosphere—as well as greenhouse
gases.
Rahman et al. (2015) P Laboratory Studied Si PV Module (90W) Observed module power reduced by 7.70 W due to dust Studies primarily directed to temperature and climate
falling on the surface of the solar module. effects.
Rajasekar (2015) Laboratory Studies of Soiling; Field PV Panel Surfaces; Development of indoor experimental simulation techni- Characterization tests: I-V, reflectance and quantum
Studies for Power Plant Poly-Si minimodules and single ques for soiling of PV surfaces. efficiency (QE) on both soiled, & cleaned coupons
mono-Si cells Failure and degradation modes of about 744 poly-Si glass/ Controlled and well-reported laboratory experiments
polymer frameless modules fielded for 18 years under the
cold-dry climate of New York was evaluated.
Thesis reports primarily results of indoor soiling studies.
Sansom et al. (2015) P,MC Egypt and Libya CSP Methodology to predicting the optical performance and Characterization of dust particles
physical topography of the glass collector surfaces of any CSP plant in Egypt, plus sand and dust samples from
given CSP plant in the presence of sand and dust storms, two desert locations in Libya
providing that local climate conditions are known &
representative sand and dust particles samples are
available
Scanlon (2015) P International All PV Technologies Summary of NREL R&D efforts in reliability, testing, stan- General report on reliability.
dards development, and quality assurance—and coordi- Reference to NREL webcast.
nating such work internationally.
Portion on importance of dust effects.
Schaeffer et al. (2015) MC Laboratory (superhydrophobic Solar Collectors Functionalized silica nanoparticles to coat various optical Focus on windows and mirrors.
coatings) elements with measured contact angles and optical trans- Discussions of various hydrophobic properties.
mission between 190 and 1100 nm on these elements.
A described solution of the functionalized silica nano-
particles exhibited superhydrophobic behavior with a sta-
tic contact angles ⩾ 160°.
Schill et al. (2015) P Gran Canary Island (Spain) [ 45 Crystalline Si Modules Soiling due primarily to building construction in area. Extensive instrumentation for monitoring of perfor-
months] 20% loss in efficiency (monitoring of I-V characteristics) in mance, climatic conditions, and irradiance.
5-month period.
Non-uniformity in distribution (caused by rain effect) Detailed information on experimental setup and data
detected by shape of I-V characteristics. acquisition.
Heavy rain event reported to clean the modules—and
completely restore the performance.
Sengupta et al. (2015) I, S General (worldwide best-practices) General best practices for solar Effect of dust and other airborne particles on the measured Handbook links with major research and solar
measurements solar resource; Effect of these particles and other atmo- resource determinations in harsh climates such as
spheric components on the calibration of instrumentation. Saudi Arabia (see KACARE portal:
Very detailed information on maintenance and calibration
of instrumentation.
Shi (2015) P,CE China CSP Viability of CSP technology in China power market. M.S. Thesis
Consideration of dust as a obstacle to deployment and Good discussions of issues in China relating to other
economics parts of the world.
Shirakawa et al. P, CM, A São Paulo, Brazil [6-18 months] Crystalline Si Modules Sub-aerial biofilm (SAB) development on PV module sur- No differences between 6- and 12-month power
(2015) faces (tropical conditions). observations in modules attributed to dual nature of
Fungi were an important component of these biofilms; soiling.
very few phototrophs were observed. Soiling effects removed by light rain.
Major microorganisms detected were melanised meriste-

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
matic ascomycetes and pigmented bacterial genera
Arthrobacter and Tetracoccus; Some diverse algae, cyano-
bacteria and bacteria were identified in biofilms.
Photovoltaic modules: significant power reductions after 6,
12 (both 7%) and 18 (11%) months.
Sleiman et al. (2015) TR General Solar Roofs Primarily a “cool roof” study, but this paper also examines The 3rd in a series of 3 papers on “cool roof”. The other
solar reflectivity. two are cited in the notable others section.
Accelerated aging method for solar is both repeatable and
reproducible within an acceptable range of standard
deviations: the repeatability standard deviation sr ranged
from 0.008 to 0.015 (relative standard deviation of 1.2–
2.1%) and the reproducibility standard deviation sR ranged
from 0.022 to 0.036 (relative standard deviation of 3.2–
5.8%).
Spataru et al. (2015) MS Denmark Crystalline Si PV Test System and Shading and soiling considerations. Practical application: the diagnostic parameters and
Laboratory Modeling Proposes a complete diagnostic method for detecting rules applied “as is” to a field test setup consisting of a
shading, increased series-resistance losses, and potential- crystalline silicon based PV string and a commercial
induced degradation of the PV generator by analyzing string inverter capable of measuring the I-V curve of
changes its current-voltage characteristics. the PV string, yielding a similar high-detection rate.
Sulaiman et al. (2015) P Malaysia Crystalline Si Modules Effects of dust accumulation on the performance of PV Characterization of local Malaysia climate zone.
panels. Experiment; dust particles on solar panels with a
constant-power light source, to determine the resulting
electrical power generated and efficiency.
Results: the accumulated dust on the surface of photo-
voltaic solar panel can reduce the system’s efficiency by up
to 50%
Tanesab et al. (2015) P, MC, TR Perth, Australia Temperate Climate PV Modules Properties of dust: particles deposited on PV modules’ Modules were in field for 18 years with no cleaning
Zones surface were dominated by fine particles built of large schedule
amounts of quartz (SiO2), followed by calcium oxide (CaO)
and some minors of feldspars minerals (KAlSi3O8), which
are primarily responsible for transmittance losses.
Module degradation for this 18þ year installation was
mostly due to non-dust issues, but dust can be attributed
to some levels in the range of 16%-29%.
Verma and Singhal P Gujrat, India Plant commissioned in Grid-Connected PV Plant (20 Major causes of cells/modules operating outside standard Consideration of all loss mechanisms for this large
(2015) 2012 MW) a-Si:H modules conditions: Voltage drop in the dc cables and protection thin-film PV plant; detailed review of power plant
diodes; Dirt and dust, Shade; Dispersion of parameters operation/reliability.
among the PV modules; Operation voltage out of the
maximum power point (MPP); Spectrum and angle of
incidence.
Bird droppings major cause of “shading” Always returned
to within 1% of rating after cleaning

53
54
Table 4 (continued )

Publication Source Focus Location [Duration] Solar Device Type Key Findings Comments/Other Conditions
Code*

Weber et al. (2015) P Worldwide overview of issues Soling and Cleaning of PV Mod- Importance of relationships among soiling, cleaning, and Discussion of PVQAT activities with dust/interactions
ules; Potential effects on module abrasion of module surfaces. Very good overviews of cleaning, indoor simulations,
abrasion Abrasion of coatings (e.g., ARCs) testing, standard procedures, abrasion, etc.)
Climate zone informations requirements (wind speed/
direction, dust compositions, moisture, natural cleaning,
water availability)
Power reduction (more severe in desert countries than
Germany)
Wu at al. (2015) MC Laboratory Study Electrodynamic Coatings Transparent ITO “fork electrodes” were configured on glass Follow up on previous work in 2014
substrates with different widths and separations.
The effects of the electrode width, the electrode spacing,

S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61
voltage, frequency, waveform, and the duty ratio on the
dust removal efficiency were investigated for artificial dust
removal..
Optimum conditions of dust removal: voltage - 1500 V,
frequency - 15 Hz, square wave, 10% duty ratio, the elec-
trode width - 0.5 mm, electrodes spacing -1.3 mm; dust
removal with with 99% effiency.
Xu et al. (2015) TR Laboratory and New York City Glass Covers Development and testing of high-performance polymeric Mechanical and chemical durability investigated and
coating on glass with a nano-scale surface roughness: both reported (suggests 30-year lifetime in NYC).
anti-reflective (ARC) as well as superhydrophobic
properties.
Yang et al. (2015) ME Acceptance procedures Utility-Scale Methodology for performance acceptance testing of solar Methodology anticipated to improvement in the
boilers using Linear Fresnel Reflectors (LFR) with Direct operation of next LFR power plants.
Steam Generation (DSG).
Proposed methodology is based on relevant ISO and
American standards applying an adapted parameter iden-
tification technique.
Discussions regarding soiling and measurement require-
ments and uncertainty analysis are also provided.
Yilbas et al. (2015) P, TR, CM Laboratory Measurements PV Glass Surfaces (Chemical/ Effects of soiling and mud on the optical, chemical, and Extensive chemical and physical measurements of
compositional properties of dust mechanical properties of PV module glass. dust partical properties.
& adhesion to surfaces) The characteristics of the dust and the mud (cementitous Interesting and useful investigations of adhesive for-
layers) formed from ces holding dust and “mud” to the module glass sur-
this dust examined by analytical techniques (optical & faces (macroscale determinations of force)
scanning electron microscopy, AFM, XRD, energy spectro-
scopy, FTIR).
Microtribometer used to measure adhesion, cohesion and
frictional forces required for the removal of dry mud from
the glass surfaces.
Zell et al. (2015) P, A, S Saudi Arabia Solar Resource Assessment In-depth and comprehensive discussion/analysis of solar Excellent discussion and analysis of the solar resource
resource assessment (results for Saudi Arabia) in the desert regions-especially Saudi Arabia.
Stresses that accurate measurements of the solar Studies tied with the important KACARE program for
Resource depend critically on environmental conditions solar deployment and research in KSA
such as ambient air temperature and dust levels that affect/ See website for detailed info on solar resources:
control project output, and are critical to project deploy- https://rratlas.kacare.gov.sa/RRMMPublicPortal/ )
ment.
Affect of dust on solar spectra—and on the output from the
PV system in these desert regions because of dust
adhesion.

*P ¼Performance, *MS¼ Modeling/Simulation; *CM ¼ Composition/Morphology; *TR¼ Transmission/Reflection; *CE ¼ Cost/Economics; *MC¼ Mitigation/Cleaning; *A ¼ ambient conditions/effects; *I¼ Instrumentation; *S ¼Spectral
Effects; TO ¼ Tilt/Orientation
S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61 55

Acknowledgements [12] Hee JY, Kumar LV, Danner AJ, Yang H, Bhatia CS. The effect of dust on
transmission and self-cleaning property of solar panels. Energy Proc
2012;15:421–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.02.051.
The authors would like to acknowledge the help of many of the [13] Kazem Hussein A, Chaichan MT, Al-Shezawi IM, Al-Saidi HS, Al-Rubkhi HS, Al-
authors of the publications listed in this compilation for providing Sinani JK, Al-Waeli AHA. Effect of humidity on the PV performance in Oman.
information on their excellent contributions. This is especially true Asian Trans Eng 2012;2:29–32 〈https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
257840932_Effect_of_Humidity_on_the_PV_Performance_in_Oman〉.
for the PVQAT group (which meets via webinar regularly) and [14] Kazem Hussein A, Said Al-Bahri, Saud Al-Badi, Haifa Al-Mahkladi, Ali H A Al-
helped to review this listing. The authors would also like to Waeli. Effect of dust on photovoltaic performance. In: Proceedings of the
gratefully acknowledge the partial support of CAPES for part of this international conference on frontiers of mechanical engineering, materials
and energy (ICFMEME 2012); December 2012b. p. 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.
work through subcontract PVE11/14 under their “Pesquisa Visi- 4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.875-877.1908.
tante Estrangeiro” program, and to Ciência sem Fronteiras that [15] Kumar Shobhit, Chaurasia PBL. Experimental study on the effect of dust
supports the student and postdocs involved with our Brasil dust/ deposition on solar photovoltaic panel in Jaipur (Rajasthan). Int J Sci Res
2012;3:1690–3 ISSN (Online): 2319–7064; Paper ID: 02014532.
soiling reliability project. The feedback and additions provided by [16] Liqun L, Zhiqi L, Chunxia SZL. Degraded output characteristic at atmospheric air
many members of PVQAT have been extremely beneficial in pollution and economy analysis of PV power system: a case study. Przegl
building this database of publications. Finally, we acknowledge the Elektrotech (Electr Rev) 2012;88(9 A):281–4 ISSN 0033–2097, R. 88 NR 9a/2012.
[17] Sun Q, Yang N, Cai X, Hu G. Mechanism of dust removal by a standing wave
help and assistance of the Solar Energy Institute for India and the electric curtain. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 2012;55(6):1018–25. http://dx.
United States (SERIIUS), which maintains a strong leading research doi.org/10.1007/s11433-012-4722-9.
and development program in soiling and dust research and miti- [18] Mekhilef S, Saidur R, Kamalisarvestani M. Effect of dust, humidity and air
velocity on efficiency of photovoltaic cells. Renew Sustain Energy Rev
gation. This group is funded jointly by the United States Depart-
2012;16:2920–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.012.
ment of Energy and the India Office of Science and Technology in [19] Mohamed AO, Hasan A. Effect of dust accumulation on performance of
the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy. photovoltaic solar modules in Sahara environment. J Basic Appl Sci Res
2012;2(11):11030–6 ISSN 2090-4304. Access: 〈http://rollingwash.net/docs/
Effect%20of%20Dust%20Accumulation%20on%20PV%20Solar%20Modules%
20in%20Sahara%20Environment.pdf〉.
[20] Niknia I, Yaghoubi M, Hessami R. A novel experimental method to find dust
Literature Summary (References Presented by Year in Alpha-
deposition effect on the performance of parabolic trough collectors. Int J Environ
betical Order)1 Stud 2012;69:233–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2012.664810.
[21] Qassem H, AlBusairi H, Betts TR, Gottschaig R. Measurements of dust-induced
performance losses on micromorph photovoltaic modules in Kuwait. In: Pro-
2012 ceedings of the European photovoltaic solar energy conference – Frankfurt.
[1] Bakirci K. General models for optimum tilt angles of solar panels: Turkey case
Germany: WIP; 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4229/27thEUPVSEC2012-4CO.10.6.
study. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012;16:6149–59. http://dx.doi.org/
[22] Qasem H, Betts TR, Müllejans H, AlBusairi H, Gottschalg R. Dust induced
10.1016/j.rser.2012.07.009.
shading on photovoltaic modules. Progr Photovolt 2012;22(2):218–26. http:
[2] Beattie NS, Moir RS, Chacko C, Buffoni G, Roberts SH, Nicola M, Pearsall.
//dx.doi.org/10.1002/pip.2230.
Understanding the effects of sand and dust accumulation on photovoltaic
[23] Qian D, Marshall JS, Frolik J. Control analysis for solar panel dust mitigation
modules. Renew Energy 2012;48:448–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
using an electric curtain. Renew Energy 2012;41:134–44. http://dx.doi.org/
renene.2012.06.007.
10.1016/j.renene.2011.10.014.
[3] Benatiallah A, Mouly A, Abidi F, Benatiallah D, Harrouz A, Mansouri I.
[24] Rahman M, Islam A, Zadidul Karim AHM, Ronee AH. Effects of natural dust
Experimental study of dust effect in multi-crystal PV solar module. Int J
on the performance of PV panels in Bangladesh. Int J Mod Educ Comput Sci
Multidiscip Sci Eng 2012;3(3) 〈http://www.ijmse.org/Volume3/Issue3/
2012;4:26–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2012.10.04.
paper1.pdf〉.
[25] D. Sanchez, Trujillo P, Martinez M, Ferrer JP, Rubio F. CPV performance versus
[4] Brown K, Narum T, Naiyong J. Soiling test methods and their use in pre-
soiling effects: cleaning policies. In: AIP-Proceedings of the 8th international
dicting performance of photovoltaic modules in soiling environments. In:
conference on concentrating photovoltaic systems, vol. 1477; 2012. p.
Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Special Conference. New York:
3480351. doi: 10.1063/1.4753902.
IEEE; 2012. p. 1881–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2012.6317960.
[26] Sanusi YK. The performance of amorphous silicon PV system under Har-
[5] Caron JR, Littmann B. Direct Monitoring Of Energy Lost Due To Soiling On
mattan dust conditions in a tropical area. Pac J Sci Technol 2012;13(1):168–
First Solar Modules In California. In: Proceedings of the of the 38th IEEE
75 〈http://www.akamaiuniversity.us/PJST.htm〉.
Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Austin, TX. New York: IEEE; 2012. http://
[27] Siddiqui R, Bajpai U. Deviation in the performance of solar module under
dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.2216859.
climatic parameter as ambient temperature and wind velocity in composite
[6] Catelani M, Ciani L, Cristaldi L, Faifer M, Lassaroni M, Rossi M. Character-
climate. Int J Renew Energy Res 2012;2(3):486–90. 〈http://ijrer.org/ijrer/
ization of photovoltaic panels: The effects of dust. In: Proceedings of the
index.php/ijrer/article/viewFile/277/pdf〉.
energy conference and exhibition-EnergyCON 2012. New York: IEEE; 2012. p.
[28] Siddiqui R, Bajpai U. Correlation between thicknesses of dust collected on
49–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EnergyCon.2012.6348198.
photovoltaic module and difference in efficiencies in composite climate. Int J
[7] Chapuis Valentin, Raphael Roth, Laure-Emmanuelle Perret-Aebi, Christophe
Energy Environ Eng 2012;3:1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-3-26.
Ballif, Hamid, Kayal, Venkatachalam Lakshmanan. Effect of soiling on per-
[29] Sharma, V., and S. Bowden, “Peak load offset and the effect of dust storms on
formances of PV systems deployed in arid climates. In: Proceedings of the
10MWp distributed grid tied photovoltaic systems installed at Arizona State
European phtovoltaic solar energy conference. Germany: WIP; 2012. Access:
University. In: Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf. (IEEE,
〈http://rakric.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/EFFECT-OF-SOILING-ON-
New York; 2012) pp. 590-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2012.6317682.
PERFORMANCES-OF-PV-SYSTEMS-DEPLOYED-IN-ARID-CLIMATE.pdf〉.
[30] Schill C, Bachmann S, Heck M, Weiss K-A, Koehl M. Impact of heavy soiling
[8] Charabi Y, Gastli A. Spatio-temporal assessment of dust risk maps for solar
on the power output of PV modules. SPIE, Bellingham, WA: Proceedings of
energy systems using proxy data. Renew Energy 2012;44:23–31. http://dx.
the SPIE; 2012. p. 8112–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.893721.
doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.12.005.
[31] Slamova K, Glaser R, Schill C, Wiesmeier S, Köhl M. Mapping atmospheric
[9] Christo FC. Numerical modeling of wind and dust patterns around a fullscale
corrosion in coastal regions: methods and results. J Photonics Energy
paraboloidal solar dish. Renew Energy 2012;39:356–66. http://dx.doi.org/
2012;2:022003-1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JPE.2.022003.
10.1016/j.renene.2011.08.038.
[32] N. Sorloaica-Hickman J. McFall S. Nason K. Davis E. Arens. Optimization of the
[10] Cristaldi L, Faifer M, Rossi M. Economical evaluation of PV system losses due
photovoltaic powered systems with dust mitigation technology for future lunar
to the dust and pollution. In: Proceedings of the energy conference and
and martian missions. In: Proceedings of the 38th IEEE photovoltaic specialists
exhibition-energyCON 2012. New York: IEEE; 2012. p. 614–8. http://dx.doi.
conference. NY: IEEE; 2012. p. 02815–8. doi: 10.1109/PVSC.2012.6318177.
org/10.1109/I2MTC.2012.6229521.
[33] Sun QX, Yang NN, Xiao ZK, Cai X, Hu G. Experimental study on efficiency of
[11] Ebert D, Bhushan B. Transparent, superhydrophobic, and wear-resistant
dust removal by standing wave electric curtain. Spacecr Eng 2012;21:72–9
coatings on glass and polymer substrates using SiO2, ZnO, and ITO nano-
〈http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HTGC201203017.htm〉.
particles. Langmuir 2012;28:11391–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la301479c.
[34] Sun QXNYang, Cai X, Hu G. Advance in lunar surface dust removal method by
electrodynamic field. Adv Mech 2012;42:785–803. http://dx.doi.org/
10.6052/1000-0992-12-054.
1
The formatting for the following publications deviates from the conventional [35] Stridh B. Evaluation of economical benefit of cleaning of soiling and snow in
protocol for this journal. The reason is to provide an alphabetical listing by year— PV plants at three European locations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE photo-
and resulting simplified reference in the accompanying Tables 1–4 by first-author voltaic specialists conference. New York: IEEE; 2012. p. 1448–51. http://dx.
last name. The access to the publication is given by the “doi” or the web access doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2012.6317869.
identification. (Note that for a doi-designated paper access is gained in most cases by [36] Touati F, Al-Hitmi M, Bouchech H. Towards understanding the effects of
typing http://dx.doi/xxx in your search engine, where “xxx” is the series of numbers, climatic and environmental factors on solar PV performance in arid desert
letters, and symbols following “doi:” that is provided with the particular reference.) regions (Qatar) for various PV technologies. Proceedings of the Renewable
56 S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61

Energies and Vehicular Technologies (REVET) 2012:26–8. http://dx.doi.org/ [56] El-Din AMAMS, Abel-Rahman AK, Ali AHH, Ookawara S. Effect of dust
10.1109/REVET.2012.6195252. deposition on performance of thin film photovoltaic module in harsh humid
[37] Wolfertstetter F, Pottler K, Merrouni AA, Mezrhab A, Pitz-Paal R. A Novel climate. In: Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on renewable
method for automatic real-time monitoring of mirror soiling rates. In: Pro- energy research and applications (ICRERA); 2013. p. 674–79. http://dx.doi.
ceedings of the SolarPACES-Marrakesch; 2012. 〈http://www.researchgate. org/10.1109/ICRERA.2013.6749839.
net/publication/236033074_A_Novel_Method_for_Automatic_Real-Time_ [57] Ghazi Sanaz, Ip Kennet, Sayigh Ali. Preliminary study of environmental solid
Monitoring_of_Mirror_Soiling_Rates〉. particles on solar flat surfaces in the UK. In: Energy Procedia, Proceedings of
the of an international conference on Mediterranean green energy forum
2013 2013, MGEF-13, vol. 42; 2013. p. 765–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.
[38] Adinoyi MJ, Said SA. Effect of dust accumulation on the power outputs of 2013.11.080.
solar photovoltaic modules. Renew Energy 2013;60:633–6. http://dx.doi.org/ [58] Gostein M, Littmann B, Caron JR, Dunn L. Comparing PV power plant soil-
10.1016/j.renene.2013.06.014. ing measurements extracted from PV module irradiance and power mea-
[39] Ahmed Darwish, Zeki, Hussein A. Kazem, and K. Sopian, “Effect of dust on surements. In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE photovoltaic specialists con-
photovoltaic performance: Review and research status. In: Latest trends in ference. NY: IEEE; 2013. p. 3004–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2013.
renewable energy and environmental informatics, Proceedings of the 7th 6745094.
international conference on renewable energy sources (RES'13) and 1st [59] Gottschalg R, Betts TR, Eeles A, Williams SR, Zhu J. Influences on the energy
International Conference on Environmental Informatics (ENINF'13) (Wseas delivery of thin film photovoltaic modules. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells
LLC; 2013a) REVIEW ISBN: 1618041754, 9781618041753 Access: 〈http:// 2013;119:169–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2013.06,011.
www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2013/Malaysia/RESEN/RESEN-32.pdf〉. [60] Hirohata Takuya, Ota Yasuyuki, Nishioka Kensuke. Effect of anti-soiling
[40] Ahmed Darwish Zeki, Kazem Hussein A, Sopian K, Alghoul MA, Chaichan coating on performance of Fresnel lens for concentrator photovoltaic mod-
Miqdam T. Impact of some environmental variables with dust on solar pho- ule. Appl Mech Mater 2013;372:575–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.sci-
tovoltaic (PV) performance: review and research status. Int J Energy Environ entific.net/AMM.372.575.
2013;7:152–9 〈http://www.researchgate.net/publication/258051333_Impac- [61] Horenstein Mark N, Mazumder Malay, Summers Jr. Robert C. Predicting
t_of_Some_Environmental_Variables_with_Dust_on_Solar_Photovoltaic_(PV) particle trajectories on an electrodynamic screen – theory and experiment.
_Performance_Review_and_Research_Status〉. J Electrostat 2013;71:185–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2012.10.005.
[41] Al-Ammri AS, Ghazi A, Mustafa F. Dust effects on the performance of PV [62] John JJ, Raval MC, Kottantharayil A, Solanki CS. Novel PV module cleaning
street lights in Baghdad City. In: Proceedings of the renewable and sus- system using ambient moisture and self-cleaning coating. In: Proceedings of
tainable energy conference (IRSEC), 2013 international; 2013. p. 18–22. the 39th IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference. NY: IEEE; 2013. p. 1481–
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IRSEC.2013.6529687. 83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2013.6744425.
[42] Al-Sabounchi Ammar M, Saeed A Yalyali, Hamda A Al-Thani. Design and [63] Kalogirou Soteris A, Agathokleous Rafaela, Panayiotou Gregoris. On-site PV
performance evaluation of a photovoltaic grid-connected system in hot characterization and the effect of soiling on their performance. Energy
weather conditions. Renew Energy 2013;53:71–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ 2013;51:439–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.12.018.
j.renene.2012.10.039. [64] Kawamoto H, Shibata T. Electrostatic cleaning system for removal of sand
[43] Appels Reinhart, Lefevre Buvaneshwari, Herteleer Bert, Goverde Hans, from solar panels. In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE photovoltaic specialists
Beerten Alexander, Paesen Robin, Medts Klaas De, Driesen Johan, Poortmans conference (PVSC), 16–21 June. Tampa, FL. New York: IEEE; 2013. p. 0094–8.
Jef. Effect of soiling on photovoltaic modules. Sol Energy 2013;96:283–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2013.6744107.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.07.017. [65] Kazem HA, Khatib T, Sopian K, Buttinger F, Elmenreich W, Albsaidi AS. Effect
[44] Awwad R, Shehadeh M, Al-Salaymeh A. Experimental investigation of dust of dust deposition on the performance of multi-crystalline photovoltaic
effect on the performance of photovoltaic systems in Jordan. In: Proceedings modules based on experimental measurements. Int J Renew Energy Res
of the GCREEDER 2013, Amman, Jordan. Academica.edu; 2013. p. 1–4. 〈http:// 2013;3:850–3 〈http://solarprofessional.com/articles/operations-main-
www.academia.edu/5486676/Rund_Awwad_PV_Dust_Effect_Paper_Jordan_ tenance/impacts-of-soiling-on-utility-scale-pv-system-performance〉.
2013〉. [66] Klimm E, Lorenz T, Weiss K-A. Can anti-soiling coating on solar glass influ-
[45] Bai Y, Kokanos B, Karady GG. Performance of a residential PV system in the ence the degree of performance loss over time of PV modules drastically? In:
desert southwest. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE power and energy society Proceedings of the 28th European PV solar energy conference, Paris. WIP:
general meeting (PES). NY: IEEE; 2013. p. 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ Berlin; 2013. 〈https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/de/veroeffentlichungen/konfer
PESMG.2013.6672248. enzbeitraege/konferenzbeitraege-2013/28th-eupvsec/klimm.pdf〉.
[46] Guan-jun Bao, Zhang Lin-wei, Cai Shi-bo, Jiang Jian-dong, Xv Fang, Jia Gui- [67] Kumar E, Suresh D, Bijan Sarkar, Behera DK. Soiling and dust impact on the
hong. Review on dust depositing on PV module and cleaning techniques. J efficiency and the maximum power point in the photovoltaic modules. Int J Eng
Mech Electr Eng 2013;8 REVIEW TM615;;TK513.3;TM925.31 Access: 〈http:// Res Technol 2013;2:1–8 ISSN: 2278-0181 Also, ESRA Publications, Vol. 2, Issue 2
en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-JDGC201308004.htm.. (February, 2013). 〈http://www.ijert.org/view.php?id¼ 2295&title¼ soiling-and-
[47] Bi X, Liang S, Li X. A novel in-situ method for sampling urban soil dust: particle dust-impact-on-the-efficiency-and-the-maximum-power-point-in-the-
size distribution, trace metal concentrations, and stable lead isotopes. Environ photovoltaic-modules〉.
Pollut 2013;177:48–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.045. [68] Leviton David. Is anything stopping a truly massive build-out of desert solar
[48] Boyle L, Flinchpaugh H, Hannigan M. Impact of natural soiling on the power? Sci Am 2013. 〈http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chal
transmission of PV cover plates. In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE photo- lenges-for-desert-solar-power/〉.
voltaic specialists conference. NY: IEEE; 2013. p. 3276–8. http://dx.doi.org/10. [69] Marion BR, Schaefer H, Caine, Sanchez G. Measured and modeled photovoltaic
1109/PVSC.2013.6745150. system energy losses from snow for Colorado and Wisconsin locations. Sol
[49] Brooks AE, DellaGiustina DN, Patterson SM, Cronin AD. The consequence of Energy 2013;97:112–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.07.029.
soiling on PV system performance in Arizona; comparing three study [70] Massi Pavan A, Mellit A, De Pieri D, Kalogirou SA. A comparison between
methods. In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE photovoltaic specialists con- BNN and regression polynomial methods for the evaluation of the effect of
ference. NY: IEEE; 2013. p. 754–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2013. soiling in large scale photovoltaic plants. Appl Energy 2013;108:392–401.
6744259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.023.
[50] Canada Scott. Quality assurance: impact of soiling on utility-scale PV system [71] Mejia Felipe A, Kleissl Jan. Soiling losses for solar photovoltaic systems
performance. In: SolarPro Magazine, Issue 6.3; April/May 2013. 〈http:// in California. Sol Energy 2013;95:357–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
solarprofessional.com/articles/operations-maintenance/impacts-of-soiling- solener.2013.06.028.
on-utility-scale-pv-system-performance. [72] Midtdal K, Jelle BP. Self-cleaning glazing products: a state-of-the-art review
[51] Caron RJ, Littmann B. Direct monitoring of energy lost due to soiling on First and future research pathways. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2013;109:126–41.
Solar modules in California. In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE photovoltaic http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2012.09.034.
specialists conference. New York: IEEE; 2013. Also, published in IEEE J. [73] Moharram KA, Abd-Elhady MS, Kandil HA, El-Sherif H. Influence of cleaning
Photovolt 2013;3:336–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.2216859. using water and surfactants on the performance of photovoltaic panels.
[52] Charabi Y, Gastli A. Integration of temperature and dust effects in siting large Energy Convers Manag 2013;68(0):266–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
PV power plant in hot arid area. Renew Energy 2013;57:635–44. http://dx. enconman.2013.01.022.
doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.02.031. [74] Ndiaye AC, Kébé MF, Ndiaye1 PA, Charki A, Kobi A, Sambou V. Impact of dust
[53] Dastoori K, Al-Shabaan G, Kolhe M, Thompson D, Makin B. Charge mea- on the photovoltaic (PV) modules characteristics after an exposition year in
surement of dust particles on photovoltaic module. In: Proceedings of the Sahelian environment: the case of Senegal. Int J Phys Sci 2013;8:1166–73.
8th international symposium on advanced topics in electrical engineering. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/IJPS2013.3921.
New York: IEEE; 2013. p. 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ATEE.2013.6563411. [75] Piliougine M, Cañete C, Moreno R, Carretero J, Hirose J, Ogawa S, Sidrach-de-
[54] Della-Giustina Daniella, Brooks Adria, Germaine Michael St, Patterson Scott, Cardona M. Comparative analysis of energy produced by photovoltaic
Cronin Alexander. Characterization and use of a Sinton FMT-350 flash tester modules with anti-soiling coated surface in arid climates. Appl Energy
at the Tucson Electric Power solar test yard. RW2D.4. OSA Technical Digest 2013;112:626–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.048.
(online). Optical Society of America. Renew Energy Environ 2013. http://dx. [76] Qasem H, Betts TR, Gottschalg R. Spatially-resolved modelling of dust effect
doi.org/10.1364/OSE.2013.RW2D.4. on cadmium telluride photovoltaic modules. Sol Energy 2013;90:154–63.
[55] Dunn L, Littmann B, Caron JR, Gostein M. PV module soiling measurement http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.01.013.
uncertainty analysis. In: Proceedings of the 39th photovoltaic specialists [77] Qasem Hassan. Effect of accumulated dust on the performance of photo-
conference. NY: IEEE; 2013. p. 658–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2013. voltaic modules. Ph.D. thesis; 2013. 〈https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/
6744236. handle/2134/11735〉.
S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61 57

[78] Rajput DS, Sudhakar K. Effect of dust on the performance of solar PV panel. Taxila, Pakistan. Int J Photoenergy 2014:1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/
Int J ChemTech Res 2013;5:1083–6 ISSN: 0974-4290; Also 〈https://www. 898414.
researchgate.net/profile/K_Sudhakar/publication/235929242_Effect_Of_Dus- [99] Boyle Liza, Flinchpaugh Holly, Hannigan Mike. Ambient airborne particle
t_On_The_Performance_Of_Solar_PV_Panel/links/ concentration and soiling of PV cover plates. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE
00b7d5145c8d878786000000.pdf〉. photovoltaic specialist conference. NY: IEEE; 2013b. p. 3171–3. doi: 10.1109/
[79] Rao A, Pillai R, Mani M, Ramamurthy P. An experimental investigation into PVSC.2014.6925609.
the interplay of wind, dust and temperature on photovoltaic performance in [100] Burton PD, King BH. Application and characterization of an artificial grime for
tropical conditions. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on photovoltaic soiling studies. IEEE Journal of Photovolt 2014;4:299–303. http:
sustainable energy technologies; 2013. p. 2303–10. //dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2270343.
[80] Sabah K, Faraj SN. Self-cleaning solar panels to avoid the effects of accu- [101] Burton PD, King BH. Spectral sensitivity of simulated photovoltaic module
mulated dust on solar panes transmittance. Int J Sci Res 2013;2:246–7 ISSN: soiling for a variety of synthesized soil types. IEEE J Photovolt 2014;4:890–8.
2319-7064〈http://www.ijsr.net/archive/v2i9/MTIwOTEzMDU¼ .pdf〉. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2301895.
[81] Santana-Rodŕiguez G, Vigil-Galan O, Jimenez-Olarte D, Contreras-Puente G, [102] Burton Patrick D, King Bruce H. Determination of a minimum soiling level to
Monroy BM, Escamilla-Esquivel A. Evaluation of a grid-connected photo- affect photovoltaic devices. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE photovoltaic
voltaic system and in-situ characterization of photovoltaic modules under specialist conference. NY: IEEE; 2014. p. 193–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
the environmental conditions of Mexico City. Rev Mexic Fisica 2013;59:88– PVSC.2014.6925529.
94 PACS: 725.40. þ w; 78.56.-a; 87.61.Ff. [103] Butuza Andrei. Reference selection procedure for studying the soiling effect on
[82] Sarver Travis, Al-Qaraghuli Ali, Kazmerski Lawrence L. A comprehensive PV performance. Acta Techna Napocencis – Ser: Appl Math Mech Eng 2014;57
review of the impact of dust on the use of solar energy: History, investiga- (1) [REVIEW]. 〈http://atna-mam.utcluj.ro/index.php/Acta/article/view/182〉..
tions, results, literature, and mitigation approaches. Renew Sustain Energy [104] Cano Jose, John Jim Joseph, Tatapudi Sai, TamizhMani GovindaSamy. Effect of
Rev 2013;22:698–733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.065. tilt angle on soiling of photovoltaic modules. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE
[83] Sayyah A, Horenstein MN, Mazumder MK. Mitigation of soiling losses in photovoltaic specialist conference. NY: IEEE; 2014. p. 3174–76. http://dx.doi.
concentrating solar collectors. In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE photovoltaic org/10.1109/PVSC.2014.6925610.
specialists conference. NY: IEEE; 2013. p. 480–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ [105] Chamaria P, Dube A, Ruchika M, Mittal AP. Consequences of dust on solar
PVSC.2013.6744194. photovoltaic module and its generation. In: Proceedings of the international
[84] Schaeffer DA, Datskos PG, Hunter SR, Rajic S, Sharma JK, Polizos G. Large area conference on power electronics (IICPE). New York: IEEE; 2014. http://dx.doi.
transparent superhydrophobic coatings. In: IEEE future of instrumentation org/10.1109/IICPE.2014.7115776.
international workshop. New York: IEEE; 2013. 〈http://www.researchgate. [106] Cristaldi,, Loredana Marco Faifer, Rossi Marco, Toscani Sergio, Catelani Mar-
net/profile/Daniel_Schaeffer/publication/259383677_Large_Area_Transpar cantonio, Ciani Lorenzo, Lazzaroni Massimo. Simplified method for evaluat-
ent_Superhydrophobic_Coatings/links/0046352b496d98edec000000.pdf〉. ing the effects of dust and aging on photovoltaic panels. Measurement
[85] Sharma V, Chandel SS. Performance and degradation analysis for long-term 2014;54:207–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.03.001.
reliability of solar photovoltaic system: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev [107] Fernández-Garcia A, Álvarez-Rodrigo L, Martínez-Arcos L, Aguiar R,
2013;27:753–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.046. Måartinez-Payés JM. Study of different cleaning methods for solar reflectors
[86] Sueto Tsuyoshi, Ota Yasuyuki, Nishioka Kensuke. Suppression of dust adhe- used in CSP plants. Energy Procedia 2014;49:80–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
sion on a concentrator photovoltaic module using an anti-soiling photo- j.egypro.2014.03.009.
catalytic coating. Sol Energy 2013;97:414–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. [108] Ghazi,, Sanaz Ali Sayigh, Ip Kenneth. Dust effect on flat surfaces—a review
solener.2013.09.006. paper. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014;33:742–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
[87] Smith Matthew K, Wamser Carl C, James Keith E, Moody Seth, Sailor David J, j.rser.2014.02.016.
Rosensteil Todd N. Effects of natural and manual cleaning on photovoltaic [109] Gostein Michael, J. Riley Caron, Bodo Littmann. Measuring soiling losses at
output. J Sol Energy Eng 2013;135:034505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ utility-scale PV power plants. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE photovoltaic
1.4023927. specialist conference. NY: IEEE; 2014. p. 885–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
[88] Touati F, Al-Hitmi MA, Boucheck HJ. Study of the effects of dust, relative PVSC.2014.6925056.
humidity, and temperature on solar PV performance in Doha: comparison [110] Griffith OJ, Vhengani L, Maliange M. Measurements of mirror soiling at a
between monocrystalline and amorphous PVs. Int J Green Energy candidate CSP site. Energy Procedia 2014;49:1371–8. http://dx.doi.org/
2013;10:680–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2012.692134. 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.146.
[89] Touati F, Massoud A, Hamad J Abu, Saeed SA. Effects of environmental and [111] Ghosh B, Ghosh AK. Effect of dust on PV module efficiency. Sci Cult
climatic conditions on PV efficiency in Qatar. In: Proceedings of the inter- 2014;80:290–7 〈http://www.solar-skin.eu/files/RC_Effect-of-Dust-on-Solar…
national conference on renewable energies and power quality (ICREPQ’13), by_B-Ghosh_Pg.290.pdf〉.
20–22 March 2013, Bilbao, Spain; 2013. p. 275–81. ISSN 2172-038 X; Also [112] Hernandez RR, Easterb SB, Murphy-Mariscal ML, Maestre FT, Tavassoli M,
〈http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2013/ph240/alshakhs2/docs/275-touati. Allen EB, Barrows CW, Belnap J, Ochoa-Hueso R, Ravi S, Allen MF. Environ-
pdf〉. mental impacts of utility-scale solar energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev
[90] Tylim A. The importance of a PV system washing program. Renew Energy 2014;29:766–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.041.
World 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584587.2014.903135 〈http://www. [113] Herrmann Jan, Timo Lorenz, Karolina Slamova, Elisabeth Klimm, Michael
renewableenergyworld.com/articles/2013/11/the-importance-of-a-pv-sys- Koehl, Karl-Anders Weiss. Desert applications of PV modules. In: Proceedings
tem-washing-program.html〉. of the 40th IEEE photovoltaic specialist conference. NY: IEEE; 2014a)
[91] Wang J, Li Y, Liang X, Liu Y. Research of adhesion force between dust par- pp. 2043–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2014.6925328.
ticles and insulator surface using atomic force microscope. High Voltage Eng [114] Herrmann Jan, Karolina Slamova, Rüdiger Glaser, Michael Köhl. Modeling the
2013;39:1352–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-6520.2013.06.010. soiling of glazing materials in arid regions with geographic information
[92] Yadav NK, Pala D, Chandra L. On the understanding and analyses of dust systems (GIS) SHC. In: Energy Procedia, Proceedings of the 2nd international
deposition on heliostat. Energy Procedia 2013;57:3004–13. http://dx.doi.org/ conference on solar heating and cooling for buildings and industry, vol. 48;
10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.336. 2013. p. 715–20. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.02.083.
[93] Zhou CD, He GF, Zhang J, Li Z, Deng X. Research on the motion pattern of dust [115] Hunter Scott R, Smith D Barton, Polizos Georgios, Schaeffer Daniel A, Lee
particles and self-cleaning mechanism of solar cells under traveling-wave Dominic F, Panos, Datskos G. Low cost anti-soiling coatings for CSP collector
electric curtain. J Hebei Univer Sci Technol 2013;34:27–32 Access: 〈http://en. mirrors and heliostats. roceedings of the SPIE, vol. 9175. Bellingham, WA:
cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HBQJ201302001.htm〉. SPIE; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2061845.
[94] Zorrilla-Casanova J, Piliougine M, Carretero J, Bernaola-Galván P, Carpena P, [116] Iberraken Fairouz. Competing risk of degradation processes of a photovoltaic
Mora-López L, Sidrach-de-Cardona M. Losses produced by soiling in the system under several conditions. Int J Electr Energy 2014;2:295–9. http://dx.
incoming radiation to photovoltaic modules. Progr Photovolt: Res Appl doi.org/10.12720/ijoee.2.4.295-299.
2013;21:790–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pip.1258. [117] John JJ, Tatapudi S, Tamizhmani G. Influence of soiling layer on quantum
efficiency and spectral reflectance on crystalline silicon PV modules. In:
2014 Proceedings of the photovoltaic specialists conference; 2014. p. 2595–9.
[95] Abrams Ze’ev R, Gonsalves Peter, Brophy Brenor, Posbic Jean. Field and lab http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2014.6925462.
verification of hyrdrophobic anti-reflective and anti-soiling coatings on [118] John J, Rajasekar V, Boppana S, Tatapudi S, Tamizhmani G. Angle of incidence
photovoltaic glass. In: Proceedings of the European PV solar energy con- effects on soiled PV modules. Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 9179. Bellingham,
ference. WIP: Germany; 2014. 5BV.1.50. 〈http://enkitech.com/wp-content/ Washington: SPIE; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2063351.
uploads/2015/09/5BV.1.50_EUPVSEC-2014.pdf〉. [119] Kazem Imad Jawad, Mahdi Imad, Jalil, Mohsen Imad Tired. Periodic cleaning
[96] Amarnadh TG, Gupta Akshay, Shyam Vijay. Investigation of the effects of effect on the output power of solar panels. J Kerbala Univ 2014;2:116–22
dust accumulation, and performance for mono and poly crystalline silica ISSN: 18130410.
modules. Int J Renew Energy Res 2014;4. 〈http://www.ijrer.org/ijrer/index. [120] Kazem AA, Chaichan MT, Kazem HA. Dust effect on photovoltaic utilization in
php/ijrer/article/view/1390/0〉. Iraq: review article. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014;37:734-49. doi: 10.1016/
[97] Al-Jawah Mohammad J. Decision aiding framework for investing in cleaning j.rser.2014.05.073.
systems for solar photovoltaic (PV) power plants in arid regions. Ph.D. thesis. [121] Kazmerski Lawrence L, Mohammed Al Jardan, Yasser Al Jnoobi, Yousef Al
Washington, DC: The George Washington University; 2014 ISBN: Shaya, Jim J. John. Ashes to ashes, dust to dust: averting a potential show-
9781303575860. stopper for solar photovoltaics. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE photovoltaic
[98] Anshir Bashir M, Ali HM, Khalil S, Ali M, Siddiqui AM. Comparison of per- specialist conference. NY: IEEE; 2014. p. 187–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
formance measurements of photovoltaic modules during winter months in PVSC.2014.6925524.
58 S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61

[122] Ketjoy N, Konyu M. Study of dust effect on photovoltaic module for photo- [142] Said Syed AM, Husam M Walwil. Fundamental studies on dust fouling effects
voltaic power plant. Energy Procedia 2014;52:431–7. http://dx.doi.org/ on PV module performance. Sol Energy 2014;107:328–37. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.095. 10.1016/j.solener.2014.05.048.
[123] Khonkar Hussam, Alyahya Abdulaziz, Aljuwaied Mazzen, Halawani Moham- [143] Sayyah Arash, Mark N Horenstein, Malay K Mazumder. Energy yield loss
mad, Saferan Abdulrahman Al, Fawwaz Al-khaldi, Alhadlaq Fawaz, Wacaser caused by dust deposition on photovoltaic panels. Sol Energy 2014;107:576–
Brent A. Importance of cleaning concentrated photovoltaic arrays in a desert 604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.05.030.
environment. Sol Energy 2014;110:268–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. [144] Schaeffer Daniel A, Georgios Polyzos D Barton, Smith Dominic F, Lee Slobo-
solener.2014.08.001. dan, Rajic Panos G, Datskos, Hunter Scott R. Spray-on anti-soiling coatings
[124] Kumar Subhash, Kaur Tarlochan. Solar PV performance—issues and challenges. that exhibit high transparency and mechanical durability. In: Proceedings of
Int J Innov Res Electr Electron Instrum Control Eng. 2014;2:2168–72 ISSN the SPIE defense þ security conference. Bellingham, Washington: SPIE; http:
2321-2004 〈http://www.ijireeice.com/upload/2014/november/IJIREEICE10% //dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2053387.
20subhash%20Solar%20PV%20Performance-Issues%20and%20Challenges.pdf〉. [145] Schaeffer, Daniel A., Georgios Polyzos, D Barton Smith, Dominic F Lee, Slo-
[125] Leloux Jonathan, Lorenzo Eduardo, García-Domingo Beatriz, Aguilera Jorge, bodan Rajic, Panos G Datskos, Scott R Hunter. Spray-on superhydrophic
Gueymard Christian A. A bankable method of assessing the performance of a coatings with high mechanical durability for anti-corrosion and anti-soiling
CSP plant. Appl Energy 2014;118:1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. applications. In: Proceedings of the SPIE 9248, unmanned/unattended sen-
apenergy.2013.12.014. sors and sensor networks X, 924806; October 17, 2014b. http://dx.doi.org/10.
[126] Lombardo T, Chabas A, Verney-Carron A, Cachier H, Triquet S, Darchy S. 1117/12.2072072.
Physico-chemical characterisation of glass soiling in rural, urban and [146] Semaoui S, Hadj Arab A, Bacha S, Zeraia H, Boudjelthia EK. Sand effect on
industrial environments. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2014;21:9251–8. http://dx. photovoltaic array efficiency in Algerian desert. In: Oral AY, Bahsi Oral ZB,
doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2853-4. Ozer M, editors. Proceedings of the 2nd international congress on energy
[127] Lorenz Timo, Elisabeth Klimm, Karl-Anders Weiss. Soiling and anti-soiling efficiency and energy related materials. New York: Springer; 2014 ISSN 2352-
coatings on surfaces of solar thermal systems—featuring an economic feasi- 2434, ISBN 978-3-319-16901-9.
bility analysis. In: Energy Procedia, Proceedings of the 2nd international con- [147] Sharma Vikrant, Sastry OS, Kumar Arun, Bora Birinchi, Chandel SS. Degra-
ference on solar heating and cooling for buildings and industry (SHC 2013), vol. dation analysis of a-Si, (HIT) hetero-junction intrinsic thin layer silicon and
48; 2014. p. 749–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.02.087. M–C–Si solar photovoltaic technologies under outdoor conditions. Energy
[128] Lorenzo E, Moretón R, Luque I. Dust effects on PV array performance: In-field 2014;72:536–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.078.
observations with non-uniform patterns. Progr Photovolt: Res Appl [148] Sibai Fadi N. Modelling and output power evaluation of series–parallel
2014;22:666–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pip.2348. photovoltaic modules. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 2014;5:139–46 〈http://
[129] Maghami MR, Hizam Hashim, Gomes Chandima, Ismail AG. Characterization citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?
of dust materials on the surface of solar panel. Life Sci J 2014;11(4s):387–90 doi¼ 10.1.1.428.9529&rep¼rep1&type¼ pdf〉.
ISSN: 1097-8135. Access: 〈https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ [149] Sinha, Parikhit, William Hayes, Lauren Ngan. Regional atmosphere–solar PV
262673734_Characterization_of_dust_materials_on_the_surface_of_solar_ interactions. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE photovoltaic specialist con-
panel〉. ference. IEEE, NY; 2014. p. 1486–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2014.
[130] Mallineni J, Yedidi K, Shrestha S, Knisely B, Tatapudi S, Kuitche J, TamizhMani 6925197.
G. Soiling losses of utility-scale PV systems in hot-dry desert climates: results [150] Smith Matthew K, Selbak Hanny, Wamser Carl C, Day Nicholas U, Krieske
from four 4–16 years old power plants. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Mathew, Sailor David J, Rosenstiel Todd N. Water cooling method to improve
photovoltaic specialists conference. New York: IEEE; 2014. http://dx.doi.org/ the performance of field-mounted, insulated, and concentrating photovoltaic
10.1109/PVSC.2014.6925615. modules. J Sol Energy Eng 2014;136:34503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/
[131] Mazumder Malay, Yellowhair Julius, Stark Jeremy, Heiling Calvin, Hudelson 1.4026466.
John, Hao Fang, Gibson Hannah, Horenstein Mark. Optical and adhesive [151] Stark, Jeremy, Julius Yellowhair, John N. Hudelson, Mark Horenstein, Malay
properties of dust deposits on solar mirrors and their effects on specular Mazumder. Optical modeling of reflectivity loss caused by dust depositon on
reflectivity and electrodynamic cleaning for mitigating energy-yield loss. CSP mirrors and restoration of enegy yield by electrodynamic dust removal.
Proc SPIE 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2066328 91750K-91750K-16. In: ASME proceedings on concentrating solar power, solar thermochemistry
[132] Mejia F, Kleissl J, Bosch JL. The effect of dust on solar photovoltaic systems. In: and thermal energy storage. ASME; 2014. pp. V001T02A031: 7 p. http://dx.
Energy Procedia, Proceedings of the SolarPACES 2013 international conference, doi.org/10.1115/ES2014-6506.
vol. 49; 2014. p. 2370–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.251. [152] Sulaiman SA, Singh AK, Mokhtar MMM, Bou-Rabee MA. Influence of dirt
[133] Ndiaye Ababacar, Kebe Cheik MF, Ndiaye Pape A, Charki Abderafi, Kobi accumulation on performance of PV panels. Energy Procedia 2014;50:50–6.
Abdessamad, Sambou Vincent. Impact of dust on the photovoltaic (PV) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.06.006.
modules characteristics after an exposition year in Sahelian environment: [153] Tan CLC, Gao S, Wee BS, Asa-Awuku A, Thio BJR. Adhesion of dust particles to
the case of Senegal. Int J Phys Sci 2014;8:1166–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/ common indoor surfaces in an air-conditioned environment. Aerosol Sci
IJPS2013.3921. Technol 2014;48:541–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.898835.
[134] Naeem, Mohammad Hussain.Soiling of photovoltaic modules: modelling and [154] Toivola, Kristopher, Paul F. Robusto, Ajay Saproo, Bill Kessler. Outdoor per-
validation of location-specific cleaning frequency optimization. M.S. thesis. formance of CIGS modules in different climates. In: Proceedings of the SPIE
Arizona State University; 2014. 〈http://repository.asu.edu/attachments/ 9179, reliability of photovoltaic cells, modules, components, and systems VII,
140875/content/Naeem_asu_0010N_14391.pdf〉. 917909; October 8, 2014. 〈doi:10.1117/12.2063308〉.
[135] Pape, Benedikt, Javier Batlles, Norbert Geuder, Rayco Zurita Piñero, Fernando [155] Weber Thomas, Hanusch Matthias, Koch Simon, Trawny Michael, Janker
Adan, Benedikt Pulvermueller. Soiling impact and correlation formulas in Andreas, Bö ttcher Anja, Berghold Juliane, Grunow Paul. From the impact of
solar measurements for CSP Projects. In: Proceedings of the SolarPaces harsh climates and environmental conditions on PV-modules – Development
conference. Berlin; 2014. doi: 10.13140/2.1.4355.0406. of a soiling and abrasion test. Amsterdam: European PVSEC; http://dx.doi.
[136] Polizos, Georgios, Daniel A. Schaeffer, D. Barton Smith, Dominic F. Lee, Panos org/10.4229/EUPVSEC20142014-5DO.11.5.
Ge. Datskos, and Scott Hunter, “Enhanced durability transparent super- [156] Wolfertstetter F, Pottler K, Geuder N, Affolter R, Merrouni AA, Mezrhab A,
hydrophobic anti-reflection coatings for CSP applications. In: ASME Pro- Pitz-Paal R. Monitoring of mirror and sensor soiling with TraCS for improved
ceedings of the vol. 1: concentrating solar power, solar thermochemistry and quality of ground based irradiance measurement. Energy Procedia
energy storage, Paper no. ES2014-6505, pp. V001T02A030; 2014a. 4 p. http:// 2014;49:2422–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.257.
dx.doi.org/10.1115/ES2014-6505. [157] Wu GM, Yin TL, Tong S, Gao Dewen, Ding Yao, Mao Pensu. Study of dust
[137] Polizos G Kyle, Winter Michael J, Lance Harry M, Meyer Beth L, Armstrong removal by transparent fork electrodes. Integr Ferroelectr 2014;153:164–70.
Daniel A, Schaeffer John T, Simpson Scott R, Hunter, Datskos Panos G. Scal- http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584587.2014.903135.
able superhydrophobic coatings based on fluorinated diatomaceous earth:
abrasion resistance versus particle geometry. Appl Surf Sci 2014;292:563–9. 2015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.12.009. [158] Alami Merrouni A, Wolfertstetter F, Mezrhab A, Wilbert S, Ritz-Paal R.
[138] Qasem H, Betts Thomas R, Müllejans Harald, AlBusairi Hassan, Gottschalg Investigation of soiling effect on different solar mirror materials under
Ralph. Dust-induced shading on photovoltaic modules. Prog Photovolt Moroccan climate. Energy Procedia 2015;69:1948–57. http://dx.doi.org/
2014;22:218–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pip.2230. 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.194.
[139] Rao, Abhishek, Rohit Pillai, Monto Mani, Praveen Ramamurthy. Influence of [159] Ali Hafiz, Muhammad Muhammad Abdullah, Zafar Muhammad Anser, Bashir
dust deposition on photovoltaic panel performance. Energy Procedia. In: Muhammad Ali, Nasir Muzaffar, Ali, Siddiqui Aysha Maryam. Effect of dust
Proceedings of the 4th international conference on advances in energy deposition on the performance of photovoltaic modules in Taxila, Pakistan.
research (ICAER 2013), vol. 54; 2014. p. 690–700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. Ther Sci 2014;00:46. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/TSCI140515046A.
egypro.2014.07.310. [160] Alnaser NW, Dakhel AA, Al Othman MJ, Batarseh I, Lee JK, Najmaii S, Alnaser
[140] Sakhuja M, Son J, Yang H, Bhatia CS, Danner AJ. Outdoor performance and WE. Dust accumulation study on the Bapco 0.5MWp PV project at University
durability testing of antireflecting and self-cleaning glass for photovoltaic of Bahrain. Int J Power Renew Energy Syst 2015;2:38–54 〈www.as-se.org/
applications. Sol Energy 2014;110:231–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ijpres/Download.aspx?ID ¼22792〉.
solener.2014.07.003. [161] Alqatari S, Alhassan A, de Weck O, Alfaris A. Spatiotemporal model for dust
[141] Sansom Christopher, Comley Paul, Bhattacharyya Debabrata, Macerol Nastja. A impact and mitigation for solar PV using Saudi Arabia as a case study. In:
comparison of polymer film and glass collectors for concentrating solar power. Proceedings of the 31st European photovoltaics solar energy conference;
Energy Procedia 2014;49:209–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.023. 2015. p. 1770–4. 〈doi:10.4229/EUPVSEC20152015-5CO.14.5〉.
S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61 59

[162] Al Saluos Wasif. Dust effect on photovoltaic electric systems. Int J Emerg Eng 43rd IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference. NY: IEEE; 2015. p. 1–4. http://
Res Technol 2015;3(4–0) ISSN 2349–4395 (Print) & ISSN 2349–4409; Also dx.doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2015.7355711.
〈http://www.ijeert.org/pdf/v3-i10/2.pdf〉. [185] Jasim Kareem K, Salman Abbas Z, Sarhan Mahdi. An analytical study to
[163] Benatiallah A, Benatiallah D, Harrouz A, Abaidi F, Mansouri S. Effect of dust reduce the effect of dust on the performance of solar panels using water
on performances of single crystal photovoltaic solar module. Int J Energy systems. Iraqi Acad Sci J 2015;21:85–100. 〈http://www.iasj.net/iasj?
Power Eng 2015;2(5) 〈http://waset.org/abstracts/energy-and-power-engi- func¼ fulltext&aId ¼102166〉.
neering/25259; Also: waset.org/pdf/books/?id ¼25259&pageNumber ¼ 348〉. [186] Jiang Yu, Lin Lu. A study of dust accumulating process on solar photovoltaic
[164] Bhasker Vinay, Arya Rahul. Effects of natural dust on the performance of modules with different surface temperatures. Energy Procedia 2015;75:337–
solar PV panel in India. J Energy Environ Carbon Credits 2015;5:1–6 ISSN: 42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.378.
2249-8621. 〈http://stmjournals.com/index.php?journal ¼JoEECC&page¼ [187] Jin Chao, Glawdel Tomasz, Ren Carolyn L, Emelko Monica B. Non-linear, non-
article&op¼ view&path%5B%5D ¼5706〉. monotonic effect of nano-scale roughness on particle deposition in absence
[165] Bhattacharya T, Chakraborty AK, Pal K. Influence of environmental dust on of an energy barrier: experiments and modeling. Sci Rep 2015. http://dx.doi.
the operating characteristics of the solar PV module in Tripura, India. Int J org/10.1038/srep17747.
Eng Res 2015;4:141–4 ISSN:2319-6890) (online) 〈http://www.ijer.in/ijer/ [188] John, Jim J, Sonali Warade, Govindasamy Tamizhmani, Anil Kottantharayil.
publication/v4s3/IJER_2015_313.pdf〉. Study of soiling loss on photovoltaic modules with artificially deposited dust
[166] Biryukov B, Pokrass P. PV module soiling: quantifying energy losses and of different gravimetric densities and compositions ccollected from different
protection against dust. In: Proceedings of the 19th Sede Boqer Symposium locations in India. In: Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE PVSC-New Orleans, IEEE,
on Solar Electricity Production, February 2015, Ben-Gurion University of the New York; 2015a. p. 236–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.
Negev; 2015 [Abstract]. 2495208.
[167] Bohra R, Gowda RG, Krishnan MR. Soiling loss analysis on various photo- [189] John JJ, Rajasekar V, Boppana S, Chattopadhyay S, Kottantharayil A, Tamizh-
voltaic technologies installed at rooftop in metropolitan/urban environment. mani G. Quantification and modeling of spectral and angular losses of
In: Proceedings of the 31st European photovoltaics solar energy conference; naturally soiled PV modules. IEEE J Photovolt 2015;5:1727–34. http://dx.doi.
2015. p. 2588–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.4229/EUPVSEC20152015-5CV.2.43. org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2463745.
[168] Boppana Sravanthi. Outdoor soiling loss characterization and statistical risk [190] Also, IEEE J Photovolt 2015;6:1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.
analysis of photovoltaic power plants. Master of science thesis. Arizona State 2495208.
University; 2015 〈http://repository.asu.edu/attachments/150806/content/ [191] Karim M, Naamane S, Delord C, Bennouna A. Study of surface damage of glass
Boppana_asu_0010N_15080.pdf〉. reflectors used in concentrated solar power plants. Energy Procedia
[169] Bouaddi S, Ihlal A. A study of soiling of different (CSP) candidate solar mirrors 2015;69:106–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.013.
in Southwest Morocco. In: The energy and materials research conference – [192] Kawamoto H, Shibata T. Electrostatic cleaning system for removal of sand
EMR2015, Madrid, Spain; 25–27 February, 2015. p. 52. Access: 〈http://www. from solar panels. J Electrost 2015;73:65–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
emr2015.org/files/EMR2015-Book-Abstracts.pdf〉. elstat.2014.10.011.
[170] Bouchalkha Abdellatif. Modeling of dust effect on solar panels in Abu Dhabi [193] Kazmerski, Lawrence L, Antonia Sonia AC Diniz, Cristiana Brasil Maia, Mar-
following a presentation at the second international energy 2030 conference celo Machado Viana, Suellen C. Costa, Pedro P. Brito, Cláudio Dias Campos,
—Abu Dhabi. Abu Dhabi: The Petroleum Institute; 2015. p. 234–8 〈http:// Lauro V. Machado Neto, Sergio de Morais Hanriot, and Leila R. de Oliveira
www.energy-2030.com/08/pdfs/r-t5-3.pdf.pdf〉. Cruz. Fundamental studies of the adhesion of dust to PV module surfaces:
[171] Boyle L, Flinchpaugh H, Hannigan MP. Natural soiling of photovoltaic cover chemical and physical relationships at the microscale. In: Proceedings of the
plates and the impact on transmission. Renew Energy 2015;77:166–73. http: 42nd IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference, New Orleans IEEE, New York;
//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.12.006. 2015. p. 1–7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2015.7356135.
[172] Brophy B, Abrams ZR, Gonsalves P, Christy K. Field performance and persis- [194] Also IEEE J Photovolt 2016:1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.
tence of anti-soiling coatings on photovoltaic glass. In: Proceedings of the 2528409.
31st European photovoltaics solar energy conference; 2015. p. 2598–602. [195] King Bruce. Advanced measurement and analysis PV derate factors. NM
http://dx.doi.org/10.4229/EUPVSEC20152015-5CV.2.47. (SAND2015-10998R). Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories Report;
[173] Burton PD, Boyle L, Griego JJM, King BH. Quantification of a minimum 2015 〈http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2015/1510998r.pdf〉.
detectable soiling level to affect photovoltaic devices by natural and simu- [196] Klimm E, Thomas Kaltenbach, Daniel Philipp, Marvin Masche, Karl-Anders
lated soils. IEEE J Photovolt 2015;5:1143–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ Weiss, Michael Koehl. Soiling and abrasion testing of surfaces for solar
JPHOTOV.2015.2432459. energy systems adapted to extreme climatic conditions. In: Proceedings of
[174] Burton Patrick D, King Bruce H, Riley Daniel. Predicting the spectral effects of the 31st European PV solar energy conference, Hamburg. WIP, Germany;
soils on high concentrating photovoltaic systems. Sol Energy 2015;112:469– 2015. Access: 〈https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/de/veroeffentlichungen/konfer
74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.11.022. enzbeitraege/konferenzbeitraege-2015/31st-eupvsec-hamburg-germany/
[175] Cáceres Gustavo, Nasirov Shahriyar, Zhang Huili, Araya-Letelier Gerardo. klimm_5cv.2.22.pdf〉.
Residential solar PV planning in Santiago, Chile: incorporating the PM10 [197] Klugmann-Radziemska Eva. Degradation of electrical performance of a crystalline
parameter. Sustainability 2015;7:4220440. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ photovoltaic module due to dust deposition in Northern Poland. Renew Energy
su7010422. 2015;78:418–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.018.
[176] Cekirge Huseyin Murat, Elhassan Ammar. A comparison of solar power sys- [198] Lee Chin, Yin Jui Kang, Chiang Pei Chin, Lin Katsushi, Suzuki Osamu, Nishi-
tems (CSP): solar tower (ST) systems versus parabolic trough (PT) systems. J maniwa Lai, Gan Pheng, Chen Fred. An innovative approach to examine
Energy Eng 2015;3:29–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20150303.11. soiling impact on photovoltaic module performance. WIKI-Cleantech.com
[177] Chakraborty Suprava, Sadhu Pradip Kumar. Technical mapping of solar (internet publication); 2015. 〈http://wiki-cleantech.com/uncategorized/an-
photovoltaic for the Coal City of India. Renew: Wind Water Sol 2015;2:11. innovative-approach-to-examine-soiling-impact-on-photovoltaic-module-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40807-015-0013-1. performance〉.
[178] Choi Minkyu, Leem Jung Woo, Yu Jae Su. Antireflective gradient-refractive- [199] Leem Jung Woo, Yu Jae Su. Artificial inverted compound eye structured
index material-distributed microstructures with high haze and super- polymer films with light-harvesting and self-cleaning functions for encap-
hydrophilicity for silicon-based optoelectronic applications. RSC Adv sulated III–V solar cell applications. RSC Adv 2015;5:608004. http://dx.doi.
2015;5:25616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4ra15686b. org/10.1039/c5ra05991g.
[179] Darwish Zeki, Ahmed Hussein A, Kazem K, Sopian MA, Al-Goul, Alawadhi [200] Li Jianghua, Zhou Kangqu, Gong Hengxiang, Zhu Xincai. A PV module surface
Hussain. Effect of dust pollutant type on photovoltaic performance. Renew dust removal device simulation. Appl Mech Mater 2015;779:259–67. http:
Sustain Energy Rev 2015;41:735–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.068. //dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.779.259.
[180] Doumane R, Balistrou M, Logerais PO, Riou O, Durastanti JF, Charki A. A [201] Li, Kangping, Fei Wang, Zhao Zhen, Yujing Sn, Zengqiang Mi, Hongbin Sun, et
circuit-based approach to simulate the characteristics of a silicon photo- al. Photovoltaic plant operating statuses identification model based on sup-
voltaic module with aging. J Sol Energy Engineering 2015. http://dx.doi.org/ port vector machine using loss quantity of electricity feature parameters. In:
10.1115/1.4029541. Proceedings of the international conference on renewable power generation
[181] Ferrada P, Araya F, Marzo A, Vidal EL Fuentealba. Performance analysis of (RPG 2015). IET Digital Library; 2015b. p. 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/cp.2015.
photovoltaic systems of two different technologies in a coastal desert climate 0504.
zone of Chile. Sol Energy 2015;114:356–63. http://dx.doi.org.ez93.periodicos. [202] Lim Joo Ho, Leem Jung Woo, Yu Jae Su. Solar power generation enhancement of
capes.gov.br/10.1016/j.solener.2015.02.009. dye-sensitized solar cells using hydrophobic and antireflection polymers with
[182] Fuentealba Edward, FranciscoAraya Pablo Ferrada, Marzo Aitor, Parrado nanoholes. RSC Adv 2015;5:61284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5ra10269c.
Cristóbal, Portillo Carlos. Photovoltaic performance and LCoE comparison at [203] Lopes de Jesus MAM, da Silva Neto JT, Timó G, Paiva PRP, Dantas MSS, de
the coastal zone of the Atacama Desert, Chile. Energy Convers Manag Mello Ferreira A. Superhydrophilic self-cleaning surfaces based in TiO2 and
2015;95:181–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.02.036. TiO2/SiO2 composite films for photovoltaic module cover glass. Appl Adhes
[183] Guo Bing, Javed W, Figgis BW, Mirza T. Effect of dust and weather conditions Sci 2015;3:5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40563-015-0034-4.
on photovoltaic performance in Doha, Qatar. In: Proceedings of the 2015 [204] Maghami Mohammad, Reza Hashim, Hizam Chandima, Gomes Mohd Amran,
smart grid and renewable energy (SGRE) workshop, March, 2015, Doha, Radzi Mohammad Ismael, Resadad, Hajighorbani Shahrooz. Power loss due
Qatar. QD-002658; 2015. to soiling on solar panel: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016;59:1307–
[184] Hacke, Peter, Patrick Burton, Alexander Hendrickson, Sergiu Spataru, Stephen 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.044.
Glick, Kent Terwilliger, “Effects of photovoltaic module soiling on glass sur- [205] Martinez-Plaza Diego, Abdallah Amir, Figgis Benjamin W, Mizra Talha. Per-
face resistance and potential-induced degradation. In: Proceedings of the formance improvement techniques for photovoltaic systems in Qatar: results
60 S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61

of first year of outdoor experiments. Energy Procedia 2015;77:386–96. http: [226] Spataru S, Sera Deszo, Kerekes Tamas, Therodorescu Remus. Diagnostic
//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.054. method for photovoltaic systems based on light I–V measurements. Sol
[206] Martinez D, Abdallah A, Figgis B. A study of several thin-film technologies Energy 2015;119:29–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.06.020.
performance under desert environmental conditions in Qatar. In: Proceed- [227] Sulaiman Shaharin A, Hussain Haizantul H, Leh Nik Siti, Razali Mohd SI.
ings of the 31st European photovoltaics solar energy conference; 2015. Effects of dust on the performance of PV panels. World Academy of Science
ISBN:3–936338-39-6. and Technology 2015;5:10–20. 〈http://waset.org/Publication/effects-of-dust-
[207] Michels Roger, Nabeyama Marcelo Giovanetti, Canteri Marcelo. Augusto de on-the-performance-of-pv-panels/10305〉.
Aguiar e Silva, Estor Gnoatto, José Airton Azevedo dos Santos and Manuel [228] Tanesab Julius, Parlevliet David, Whale Jonathan, Urmee Tania, Pryor Travor.
Messias Alvino de Jesus, “Yield from photovoltaic modules under real The contribution of dust to performance degradation of PV modules in
working situation in west Paraná – Brazil. Acta Scientiarum 2015;37:19–24. temperate climate zone. Sol Energy 2015;120:147–57. http://dx.doi.org/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v37i1.19191. 10.1016/j.solener.2015.06.052.
[208] Mondal Amit Kumar, Bansal Kamal. Structural analysis of solar panel clean- [229] Verma Ashish, Singhal Shivya. Solar PV performance parameter and recom-
ing robotic arm. Curr Sci 2015;108:1047–52. 〈http://www.currentscience.ac. mendation for optimization of performance in large scale grid connected
in/Volumes/108/06/1047.pdf〉. solar PV plant—case study. J Energy Power Sources 2015;2:40–53. 〈http://
[209] Nazar Rupali. Improvement of efficiency of solar panel using different www.ethanpublishing.com/uploadfile/2015/0202/20150202034553486.pdf〉.
methods. Int J Electr Electron Eng 2015;7. 〈http://www.arresearchpublica [230] Weber, Thomas, Nicoletta Ferretti, Felix Schneider, Andreas Janker, Michael
tion.com/images/shortpdf/117.pdf〉. Trawny, Juliane Berghold. Impact & Consequences of Soiling and Cleaning of
[210] Negash Tariku, Tadiwose Tassew. Experimental investigation of the effect of PV Modules. NREL PV Module Reliability Workshop, Golden, CO; February
tilt angle on the dust photovoltaic module. Int J Energy Power Eng 2015. Access: 〈http://www.nrel.gov/pv/performance_reliability/pdfs/2015_
2015;4:227–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20150404.15. pvmrw_105_weber.pdf〉.
[211] Naeem, Mohammad, Govindasamy Talizhmani. Climatological relevance to [231] Wu Guangming, Li Dan, Yu Jianxiang, Yin Tianlan, Feng Dongdong. Further
the soiling loss of photovoltaic modules. In: Proceedings of the Saudi Arabia study of electric dust removal with transparent fork electrodes. Am J Anal
smart grid conference, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 7–9 Dec, 2015. Chem 2015;6:196–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2015.63018.
[254] Pettersen A, Deråas JH, Krogh Selj, Stensrud Marstein E. PV modules in Nordic [232] Xu, QF, Zhao Y, Kujan B, Lyons A. An Anti-reflective and anti-soiling coating
climate: Effects of soiling and snow. In: Proceedings of the 31st European pho- for photovoltaic panels. In: Proceedings of the techconnect: world innova-
tovoltaics solar energy conference; 2015. (Also, http://bipvno.no/publications/ tions conference. Washington, DC; 2015. 〈http://www.techconnectworld.
EUPVSEC2015_Poster_IFE_Soiling&Snow.pdf). ISBN 3-936338-39-6. Access: com/World2015/a.html?i ¼413〉.
http://bipvno.no/publications/EUPVSEC2015_Poster_IFE_Soiling&Snow.pdf. [233] Yang FD, Itskhokine S, Benmarraze M, Benmarraze A, Hofer F, Lecat, Ferriére
[212] Pettersen Anna Derås. Simulation and experimental study of power losses A. Acceptance testing procedure for linear Fresnel reflector solar systems in
due to shading and soiling on photovoltaic (PV) modules. Masters thesis. utility-scale solar thermal solar plants. Energy Procedia 2015 〈http://www.
Norway: Norwegian University of Life Sciences; 2015. 〈http://hdl.handle.net/ solareuromed.com/sites/default/files/publications/solareur-
11250/278807〉. omed_solarpaces2014_acceptance.pdf〉.
[213] Penetta, Selene, Shengzhe Yu, John Barry, Zhiqiang Guan. A case study on [234] Yilbas Bekir Sami, Ali Haider, Khaled Mazen M, Al-Aqeeli Nasser, Abu-Dheir
parameters influencing dust accumulation on CSP reflectors. In: SuNEC 2015, Numan, Varanasi Kripa K. Influence of dust and mud on the optical, chemical,
M. Pagliaro M, Meneguzzo F, editors. Sun new energy conference, Sicily, Italy; and mechanical properties of PV protective glass. Sci Rep 2015;5:15833. http:
2015. OP-2. doi:10.17265/1934–8975/2016.02.001. //dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep15833.
[214] Phinikarides A, Makrides G, Zinsser B, Schuber M, Georghiou GE. Analysis of [235] Zell Erica, Gasim Sami, Wilcox Stephen, Katmoura Suzan, Stoffel Thomas,
photovoltaic system performance time series: seasonality and performance loss. Shibli Husain, Engle-Cox Jill, Subie Madi Al. Assessment of solar radiation
Renew Energy 2015;77:51–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.091. resources in Saudi Arabia. Sol Energy 2015;119:422–38. http://dx.doi.org/
[215] Piotrowska-Woroniak Joana, Woroniak G, Zaluska W. Energy production 10.1016/j.solener.2015.06.031.
from PV and carbon reduction in great lakes region of Masuria Poland: a case
study of water part in Elk. Renew Energy 2015;83:1315–25. http://dx.doi.org/ Special Reports of Interest
10.1016/j.renene.2015.05.034. [236] International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group. Utility scale solar
[216] Rahman MM, Hasanuzzaman M, Rahim NA. Effects of various parameters on power plants: a guide for developers and investors. World Bank; 2012.
PV-module power and efficiency. Energy Convers Manag 2015;103:348–58. 〈https://www2.unece.org/wiki/download/attachments/25267247/SOLAR%
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.06.067. 2BGUIDE%2BBOOK.pdf?api ¼v2〉.
[217] Rajasekar Vidyashree. Indoor soiling method and outdoor statistical risk [237] National Centre for Photovoltaic Research and Education, Indian Institute of
analysis of photovoltaic power plants. Master of science thesis. Arizona State Technology—Bombay, All India Survey of PV Module Degradation 2013. IIT
University; 2015. 〈https://repository.asu.edu/items/30053, and https://reposi Bombay; 2013. 〈http://www.ncpre.iitb.ac.in/pages/publications_reports.html〉.
tory.asu.edu/attachments/150884/content/Rajasekar_asu_0010N_14973.pdf〉. [238] Universidade Federal de Santa Clara, Grupo de Pesqusa Estratégeica em
[218] Sansom C, Comley P, King P, Almond H, Atkinson C, Endaya E. Predicting the Energy Solar, and Instituto Para o Desenvolvimento das Energias Alternativas
effects of sand erosion on collector surface in CSP plants. Energy Procedia na América Latina, REPORT: “Scientific review of CdTe photovoltaic tech-
2015;69:198–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.023. nology: Impacts and benefits of First Solar's CdTe technology for large-scale
[219] Scanlon B. Assuring solar modules will last for decades. Renew Energy World deployment in Brazil – Performance, environmental, health and safety
2015. 〈http://www.nrel.gov/news/features/2015/16488〉. assessment” (2015). The report can be accessed on the First Solar website
[220] Schaeffer Daniel A, Georgios Polizos D Barton, Smith Dominic F, Lee Scott R, through: 〈www.aguacalientesolarproject.com〉.
Hunter, Datskos Panos G. “Optically transparent and environmentally dur- [239] International Energy Agency (IEA). Photovoltaic power systems program,
able superhydrophobic coating based on functionalized SiO2 nanoparticles. “Energy from the desert: very large scale PV power plants for shifting to
Nanotechnology 2015;35:055602–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/ renewable energy future. IEA PVPS Task 2015;8 ISBN 978-3-906042-29-9,
26/5/055602. February 2015.
[221] Schill Christian, Brachmann Stefan, Koehl Michael. Impact of soiling on IV- [240] Philipps Simon P, Bett Andreas W, Horowitz Kelsey, Kurtz Sarah. The status
curves and efficiency of PV-modules. Sol Energy 2015;12:259-162. http://dx. of concentrator photovoltaics (CPV) technology. TP-6A20-63916. Washing-
doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.12.003. ton, DC: Fraunhofer ISE and NREL (U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Sci-
[222] Sengupta M, Habte A, Kurtz S, Dobos A, Wilbert S, Lorenz E, et al. Best entific and Technical Information; 2015.
practices handbook for the collection and use of solar resource data for solar [241] Groupe Reaction. CSP Prospects in Saudi Arabia, MENSOL 2014, Report
energy applications. Report no. TP-5D00-63112. NREL. 255 p. 〈http://www. published by CSP Today; 2014. 〈http://www.csptoday.com/menasol/pdf/
nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/63112.pdf〉. cspsaudiarabia.pdf〉.
[223] Shi Meiling. Market analysis of Israeli CSP technologies in the Chinese mar- [242] Pitz-Paal R, Amin A, Bettzüge M, Eames Philip, Fabrizi Fabrizio, Flamant G,
ket. M.S. Thesis. Duke University; 2015. 〈http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/ Novo F Garcia, Holmes J, Kribus A, van der Laan H, Lopez C, Papagiannako-
dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/9602/Meiling%20Shi-Master%20Project- poulos P, Pihl E, Smith an P, Wagner H-J. Concentrating solar power in
2015.pdf?sequence ¼ 1〉. Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: achieving its potential. J
[224] Shirakawa MA, Zilles R, Mocelin A, Christine CG, Gorbushina AG, Heidrich, Energy Power Eng 2013;7:219–28.
Giudice MC, Negro GMBD, John VM. Microbial colonization affects the effi- [243] Houssos EE, Chronis T, Fotiadi A, Hossain F. Atmospheric circulation char-
ciency of photovoltaic panels in a tropical environment. J Enviro Manag acteristics favoring dust outbreaks over the Solar Village, Central Saudi
2015;157:160–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.050. Arabia. Mon Weather Rev 2015;143:3263–75.
[225] Sleiman Mohamad, Chen Sharon, Gilbert Haley E, Kirchstetter Thomas W, [244] S. Naseema Beegum, Imen Gherboudj, Naira Chaouch, Hosni Ghedira. Atmo-
Berdahl Paul, Bibian Erica, Bruckman Laura S, Cremon Dominic, French Roger spheric composition modeling over the Arabian Peninsula for solar energy
H, Gordon Devin A, Emiliani Marco, Kable Justin, Ma Liyan, Martarelli Milena, applications. In: Proceedings of the ICEM 2015a, Boulder, Colorado; 2015.
Paolinin Riccardo, Prestia Matthew, Renowdene John, Revelp Gian Marco, 〈http://icem2015.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/1130_NaseemaShyju.pdf〉.
Rosseler Olivier, Shiao Ming, Terraneo Giancarlo, Yang Tammy, Yu Lingtao, [245] Sarah Kurtz. International PV Quality Assurance Task Force (PVQAT), Solar
Zinzi Michele, Akbari Hashem, Levinson Ronnen, Destaillats Hugo. Soiling of ABCs Workshop; 2015 〈www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/65121.pdf〉.
building envelope surfaces and its effect on solar reflectance – Part III: [246] ACWA Power and 5 Capitals. Noor III Tower CSP Plant, Ouarzazate, Morocco:
interlaboratory study of an accelerated aging method for roofing materials. Spoecific Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Volume 1 (Discus-
Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2015;143:581–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. sions of impact of dust on CSP, mitigation, and dust prevention site pre-
solmat.2015.07.031. parations) 〈http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContent
S.C.S. Costa et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016) 33–61 61

Server/WDSP/IB/2015/04/07/000477144_20150407101229/Rendered/PDF/ [250] Tagawa Kotaro, Kutani Akifumi, Qinglin Pio. Effect of san erosion of glass
E44890V90P131200Box391417B00PUBLIC0.pdf〉. surface on performances of photovoltaic module. Sustain Res Innov Proc
[247] Beegum S Naseema, Priya Vijayan Hosni Ghedira. Irradiance modeling using 2012;4:75–7 ISSN 2079–6226.
SBDART on clear and cloudy conditions: sensitivity to aerosol and cloud para- [251] McEvoy Augustin, Castañer Luis, Markvart Tom. Solar cells: materials, man-
meters. In: Proceedings of the ICEM 2015, Boulder, Colorado; 2015b. 〈http:// ufacture and operation. Waltham (MA): Elsevier Scientific and Academic
icem2015.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/1810_NaseemaShyju.pdf〉. Press; 978-1-85617-457-2.
[248] Sleiman M, Ban-Weiss G, Gilbert HE, Francois D, Berdahl P, Kirchstetter TW, [252] Gervorkian Peter. Large-scale solar power systems: construction and eco-
Destaillats H, Levinson R. Soiling of building envelope surfaces and its effect on nomics. UK: Cambridge University Press; 9781107697171.
solar reflectance – Part I: analysis of roofing product databases. Sol Energy [253] World Bank. Tower CSP Plant: environmental report – specific environmental
Mater Sol Cells 2011;95:3385–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2013.11.028. and social impact assessment. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. 〈http://
[249] Sleiman M, Kirchstetter TW, Berdahl P, Gilbert HE, Quelen S, Marlot L, et al. Soiling documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/03/24315946/morocco-second-
third-phase-noor-concentrated-solar-power-project-vol-9-tower-csp-plant-
of building envelope surfaces and its effect on solar reflectance – Part II: devel-
environmental-report-specific-environmental-social-impact-assessment〉;
opment of an accelerated aging method for roofing materials. Sol Energy Mater
2015.
Sol Cells 2014;122:271–81. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.08.002.

You might also like