Sar at Near Distance
Sar at Near Distance
Sar at Near Distance
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275584833
PERFORMANCE OF ULTRA-WIDEBAND
WEARABLE ANTENNA UNDER SEVERE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND...
CITATIONS READS
2 70
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Waddah Al ashwal on 16 February 2016.
www.arpnjournals.com
ABSTRACT
Two ultra-wideband (UWB) planar monopole antennas have been reported in this paper. The antennas have been
developed for wearable application. Worn-systems require flexibility and tolerance against external effects. The substrates
of the proposed antennas have been made of jeans while radiators were made of copper tapes. Simulated and measured
performances of the antennas in terms of return loss and radiation patterns have been discussed in this work. Recorded
results have shown that the operating frequency ranges from 3.04 GHz to 10.3 GHz and from 3.04 GHz to 11.3 GHz with
respect to -10 dB for the first and second antennas respectively. The antennas have been tested under severe conditions
such as operating in water and aggregates and results have been presented and discussed. Moreover, an extended study on
the safety concerns of the antennas by means of specific absorption rate (SAR) has been included in this work. The
approximated SAR has been found to be within the safety guidelines set by Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
1613
VOL. 10, NO. 4, MARCH 2015 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2015 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
1614
VOL. 10, NO. 4, MARCH 2015 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2015 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
1615
VOL. 10, NO. 4, MARCH 2015 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2015 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
that it can withstand severe conditions with succeeding to or mud, the following experiments have included testing
keep its operating bandwidth as desirable. the performance of the antennas (namely antenna I and
antenna II) at conditions such as: soaking the antennas in
water, burying in fine aggregates and finally testing the
antennas when both of the conditions are present. Figure-6
shows pictures of these experiments. The measurement of
the return loss has been taken for the frequency range from
2 GHz to 11 GHz at room temperature. In order to prevent
the network analyzer from any damage, the antennas have
been soaked to a level beneath SMA connector to prevent
water from leaking into the cable.
As the aim of the project to produce flexible Figure-8. Antennas in water with a plastic bag.
wearable antennas, both of the antennas have been tested
under very severe environmental conditions. Expecting the The results in Figure-7 show that the antennas
user is a person whose uniform may endure wetness, sands have a good chance to keep operating within an acceptable
1616
VOL. 10, NO. 4, MARCH 2015 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2015 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
1617
VOL. 10, NO. 4, MARCH 2015 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2015 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
3 GHz 3 GHz
4 GHz 4 GHz
5 GHz 5 GHz
6 GHz 6 GHz
Figure-12. Radiation pattern of antenna I (units: dBµV/m). Figure-13. Radiation pattern of antenna II (units: dBµV/m).
4. PHANTOM MODEL FOR SPECIFIC Intel® Xeon® E5620 2.4 GHz CPU, 4×Tesla 2070
ABSORPTION RATE (SAR) GPUs.
The methodology of developing this model is
based on [27], [32] and [33]. CST STUDIO SUITE
developers have also shared a note on “BODY
WEARABLE ANTENNA Simulation Challenges” of
RFID, ISM and UWB antennas [42]. The note discusses
construction and body model handling when dealing with
complex geometries. The minimum specifications of
hardware suggested for proper performance is also
included (for homogenous model at εr = 42). Figure-14
shows a worn antenna on a homogenous phantom and
corresponding mesh cells, memory, time, and hardware Figure-14. Model size and required.
amounts for full body size. These figures are based on
1618
VOL. 10, NO. 4, MARCH 2015 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2015 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
Homogenous phantom is a one layer model with human arm model (phantom). The model was developed
one dielectric constant, while voxel phantom is more in CST Microwave Studio. It simply represents a portion
complex and has an excellent mimic with the human of the human body; that is the arm. Four-layer model
body. Dielectric properties vary with the distribution of (skin, fat, muscle and bone) has been considered for the
the human body layers as we go deeper. Figure-15 shows evaluation. Curvature of the body part has been
homogenous and voxel phantoms. approximated to a conical shape with top and bottom
radiuses. The thickness of each layer was taken as: skin =
2 mm, fat = 3 mm, muscle = 8 mm and bone = 10 mm
(radius) as in [33] and [43]. Figure-16 illustrates the arm
model developed in CST MWS and the orientation of the
antenna with respect to the model. The model consists of
bone (centre), muscle, fat, and skin (outer layer).
The total 10-g SAR for the two proposed
antennas has been evaluated for selected frequencies at
different distances. The graphic illustration in Figure-18
and Figure-19 show the total SAR for frequencies 3 GHz,
5 GHz, 7 GHz and 9 GHz at 5 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm and
Figure-15. (a) homogenous phantom, (b) voxel 20 mm placements from the phantom.
phantom, (c) cross-section of voxel phantom. The computed values plotted in Figure-17 show
that the antenna has very low total SAR as the antenna is
The note has also included a comparison placed farther from the phantom. This can be seen more
between homogenous and voxel phantoms in terms of clearly at the lower band frequencies such as 3 GHz and
S11 and SAR considering full and partial body. The 5 GHz, where the total SAR for 3 GHz has reduced from
difference was found to be in small fractions (according more than 6 W/kg at 5 mm to lower than 3 W/kg at 20
to the example studied in the note: SAR: 0.667 W/kg for mm. It can be understood that the phantom has a bigger
homogenous model and SAR: 0.883 W/kg for voxel chance to absorb more radiated and reflected power at
model). It also studied the same example on full and near spacing than far one.
reduced model. The result was found to be very close The graph also shows how the total SAR
(SAR: 0.667 W/kg for full homogeneous body model and decreases as the frequency increases for a fixed distance,
SAR: 0.644 W/kg for partial homogeneous body model). where the total SAR at 5 mm reduces from more than 6
Based on the available information, our developed model W/kg at 3 GHz to about 1 W/kg at 9 GHz.
can provide a closer approximation for the performance
of the antenna than the homogenous model does. Since
the model consists of multiple layers with different
permittivity, which makes it closer to voxel model to a
certain level. This model is found to be cheaper and less
complex when carrying out simulation tests for wearable
antennas on personal computer with lower specifications.
The SAR results for 10-g change with the frequency. This
could be regarded to the fact that human tissues are
anisotropic mediums. The difference in the internal
structure of the model has caused different responses for
Figure-16. Human arm model developed in CST MWS, the penetrating radiations. The conductivity of the skin is
a) perspective view, b) cross section of the top view the main player in the absorption of the radiated power.
(zoomed in). The skin has the highest conductivity followed by muscle
and bone layers, while the fat has the lowest. This
As mentioned previously, the performance of explains that most of the absorbed power occurs on the
proposed antennas operating in close proximity to the skin.
body has been conducted using developed numerical
1619
VOL. 10, NO. 4, MARCH 2015 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2015 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
1620
VOL. 10, NO. 4, MARCH 2015 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2015 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
[5] A. Ahlbom., U. Bergqvist., J. H. Bernhardt., J. P. ultra-wideband bevelled monopole for portable UWB
Cesarini., M. Grandolfo., M. Hietanen., A. F. systems,” Electron. Lett., vol. 47, no. 20, p. 1112,
Mckinlay., M. H. Repacholi., D. H. Sliney., J. A. J. 2011.
Stolwijk. and others. “Guidelines for limiting
exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and [16] K. Zhang., Y. Li. and Y. Long. “Band-Notched UWB
electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Printed Monopole Antenna With a Novel Segmented
Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.,” Circular Patch,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett.,
Heal. Phys, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 494–522, 1998. vol. 9, pp. 1209–1212, 2010.
[6] “IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining the [17] M. GOUDA. and M. Y. M. YOUSEF. “Bandwidth
Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate Enhancement Techniques Comparison for Ultra
(SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Wideband Microstrip Antennas for Wireless
Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques,” Application,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 35,
IEEE Std 1528-2003, pp. 1–120, 2003. no. 2, pp. 184–193, 2012.
[7] R. Azim., M. T. Islam. and N. Misran. “Printed Planar [18] L. Zhang., Z. Wang. and J. L. Volakis. “Textile
Antenna for Wideband Applications,” J. Infrared, Antennas and Sensors for Body-Worn Applications,”
Millimeter, Terahertz Waves, pp. 969–978, May IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., vol. 11, pp.
2010. 1690–1693, 2012.
[8] S. H. Choi., J. K. Park., S. K. Kim. and J. Y. Park. “A [19] K. Koski., A. Vena. and L. Sydanheimo. “Design and
new ultra-wideband antenna for UWB applications,” implementation of electro-textile ground planes for
Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 399– wearable UHF RFID patch tag antennas,” vol. 12, pp.
401, March. 2004. 1590–1593, 2013.
[9] K. Song., Y. Yin., B. Chen., S. Fan. and F. Gao. [20] E. Moradi., T. Bjorninen., L. Ukkonen. and Y.
“Bandwidth Enhancement Design of Compact UWB Rahmat-Samii. “Effects of Sewing Pattern on the
Step-Slot Antenna with Rotated Patch,” in Progress In Performance of Embroidered Dipole-Type RFID Tag
Electromagnetics. 2011. vol. 22, no. March, pp. 39– Antennas,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., vol.
45. 11, pp. 1482–1485, 2012.
[10] C. Sim. “A Compact Monopole Antenna for Super [21] W. Davis. and W. Stutzman. “Wearable Ultra-
Wideband Applications,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Wideband Half-Disk Antennas,” in 2005 IEEE
Propag. Lett., vol. 10, pp. 488–491, 2011. Antennas and Propagation Society International
Symposium, 2005, vol. 3A, pp. 500–503.
.[11]A. Antonino-Daviu., E. and Cabedo-Fabres. M.
Ferrando-Bataller. M. and Valero-Nogueira. [22] M. A. R. Osman., M. K. A. Rahim., N. A. Samsuri.
“Wideband double-fed planar monopole antennas,” and M. E. Ali. “Compact and embroidered textile
Electron. Lett., vol. 39, no. 23, pp. 3–4, 2003. wearable antenna,” in 2011 IEEE International RF &
Microwave Conference, 2011, vol. 4, no. December,
[12] Z. N. Chen., T. S. P. See. and X. Qing. “Small Printed pp. 311–314.
Ultrawideband Antenna With Reduced Ground Plane
Effect,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 55, no. 2, [23] M. A. Stuchly. “Electromagnetic fields and health,”
pp. 383–388, February. 2007. IEEE Potentials, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 34–39, Apr. 1993.
[13] C.-Y. Hong., C.-W. Ling., I.-Y. Tarn. and S.-J. [24] A. Rosen., M. A. Stuchly. and A. Vander Vorst.
Chung. “Design of a Planar Ultrawideband Antenna “Applications of RF/microwaves in medicine,” IEEE
With a New Band-Notch Structure,” IEEE Trans. Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 963–
Antennas Propag., vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 3391–3397, 974, March. 2002.
December. 2007.
[25] I. Chatterjee., M. J. Hagmann. and O. P. Gandhi.
[14] K. Koski., A. Vena., L. Sydanheimo., L. Ukkonen. “Electromagnetic absorption in a multilayered slab
and Y. Rahmat-Samii. “Design and Implementation of model of tissue under near-field exposure conditions,”
Electro-Textile Ground Planes for Wearable UHF Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 379–388, 1980.
RFID Patch Tag Antennas,” IEEE Antennas Wirel.
Propag. Lett., vol. 12, pp. 964–967, 2013. [26] I. Chatterjee., O. P. Gandhi., M. J. Hagmann. and A.
Riazi. “Plane-wave spectrum approach for the
[15] P. Thomas., D. D. Krishna., M. Gopikrishna., U. G. calculation of electromagnetic absorption under near-
Kalappura. and C. K. Aanandan. “Compact planar
1621
VOL. 10, NO. 4, MARCH 2015 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2015 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
field exposure conditions,” Bioelectromagnetics, vol. [38] M. Lazebnik., E. L. Madsen., G. R. Frank. and S. C.
1, no. 4, pp. 363–377, 1980. Hagness. “Tissue-mimicking phantom materials for
narrowband and ultrawideband microwave
[27] N. Kuster. and Q. Balzano. “Energy absorption applications.,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 50, no. 18, pp.
mechanism by biological bodies in the near field of 4245–58, September. 2005.
dipole antennas above 300 MHz,” IEEE Trans. Veh.
Technol., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 1992. [39] Y. Hao. and A. Alomainy. “Antennas and Propagation
for Body-Centric Wireless Communications,” IEEE
[28] K. Meier., V. Hombach., R. Kastle., and N. Kuster. Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 148–148,
“The dependence of electromagnetic energy Apr. 2008.
absorption upon human-head modeling at 1800
MHz,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 45, [40] W. A. M. Al Ashwal. and K. N. Ramli. “Compact
no. 11, pp. 2058–2062, 1997. UWB wearable antenna with improved bandwidth and
low SAR,” in 2013 IEEE International RF and
[29] O. P. Gandhi., G. Lazzi. and C. M. Furse. Microwave Conference (RFM), 2013, pp. 90–94.
“Electromagnetic absorption in the human head and
neck for mobile telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz,” [41] W. A. M. Al Ashwal. and K. N. Ramli. “Compact
IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 44, no. 10, UWB wearable antenna with improved bandwidth and
pp. 1884–1897, 1996. low SAR,” in 2013 IEEE International RF and
Microwave Conference (RFM), 2013, pp. 90–94.
[30] A. Christ. and N. Kuster. “Differences in RF energy
absorption in the heads of adults and children,” [42] M. Rütschlin. “BODY WEARABLE ANTENNA
Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 26, no. S7, pp. S31–S44, simulation challenges,” in Euroupean User
2005. Conference, 2013.
[31] A. ANSI. “IEEE C95. 1-1992: IEEE Standard for [43] M. L. Scarpello., D. Kurup., H. Rogier., D. Vande
Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Ginste., F. Axisa., J. Vanfleteren., W. Joseph., L.
Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to Martens. and G. Vermeeren. “Design of an
300 GHz, The,” Inc., New York, NY, 1992. Implantable Slot Dipole Conformal Flexible Antenna
for Biomedical Applications,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
[32] O. Kivekäs., T. Lehtiniemi. and P. Vainikainen. “On Propag., vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 3556–3564, October,
the general energy-absorption mechanism in the 2011.
human tissue,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 43,
no. 3, pp. 195–201, Nov. 2004.
1622
View publication stats