Environmental Geotechnics: Year 2015-2016

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Environmental

geotechnics
Year 2015-2016

Exercise
eng. phd Luca Piciullo

The area shown in the figure has been chosen for the realization of a 4-floors building. Geotechnical investigations have been
carried out along three vertical (S1, S2, S3). Moreover, the installation of piezometric cells showed the presence of a
piezometric line coinciding with the ground surface.
Referring to the results of boring works (Figure 2), verify if it is possible to build n. 3 stratigraphic sections to be taken as
reference in the subsequent identification of the geotechnical model of the subsoil.

0 50m 100m

.S .S 2
1

.S 3

1. Let's elaborate the results of


the dynamic penetration
tests (SPT, Standard Penetration Test) performed along the vertical survey (Table 1).
2. Classify the soil taking into account the granulometry of the 4 samples taken along the vertical S1 and S2, for
which the sieve analysis (Table 2) and the sedimentation (Table 3) have been carried out in the labs.
Figura 2. stratigrafy

Tabella 1. Results SPT.

Vertical S1 Vertical S2 Vertical S3


z(m) N1 N2 N3 z(m) N1 N2 N3 z(m) N1 N2 N3
1.0 2 4 4 1.0 2 3 5 1.0 2 4 4
2.0 1 4 5 2.0 3 4 6 2.0 1 4 5
3.0 4 8 5 3.0 2 2 4 3.0 4 8 5
4.0 2 6 7 4.0 1 3 1 4.0 2 6 7
5.0 1 1 1 5.0 1 5 2 5.0 1 5 2
6.0 2 1 2 6.0 2 2 3 6.0 1 1 1
7.0 1 2 2 7.0 9 11 19 7.0 2 1 2
8.0 1 1 1 8.0 10 12 21 8.0 1 2 1
9.0 2 1 2 9.0 12 13 21 9.0 11 12 23
10.0 7 2 2 10.0 10 13 23 10.0 13 13 24
11.0 10 12 19 11.0 28 34 75 11.0 15 21 75
12.0 9 14 23 12.0 18 14 25
13.0 11 19 20 13.0 13 13 20
14.0 31 51 62

Tabella 2. Results sieve analysis

Vertical S1 Vertical S2
z=2m z=9m
s = 2.65 t/m3 s = 2.56 t/m3
n = 0.58 e = 0.87
sieve diameter weight of the diameter (mm) weight of the
(mm) material (g) material (g)
1“ 25.000 - 25.000 0
3/4“ 19.000 - 19.000 50.4
1/2“ 12.500 - 12.500 10.1
3/8“ 9.500 - 9.500 47.3
1/4“ 6.300 0 6.300 45.1
n° 4 4.750 0 4.750 42.3
n° 10 2.000 7.5 2.000 26.5
n° 16 1.180 19.8 1.180 165.7
n° 20 0.850 21.2 0.850 308.2
n° 30 0.600 62.2 0.600 465.7
n° 40 0.425 95.5 0.425 556.1
n° 60 0.250 108.3 0.250 392.8
n° 100 0.150 78.8 0.150 223.9
n° 200 0.075 58.4 0.075 127.6
<0.075 26.2 <0.075 58.8
Total weight = 478.5g total weight = 2600.2g

Tabella 3. Risultati della sedimentazione

Vertical S1 Vertical S2
z=6m z=4m
s = 2.15 t/m3 s = 2.66 t/m3
W(%)=41,98 W(%)=46,05
n=0,52 n=0,54
WL(%)=46,9 WL (%)=44,7
WP(%)=29,8 WP (%)=30,3

Diameter Percentage by Diameter Percentage by


(mm) weight of (mm) weight of
particles in particles in
suspension suspension
(%) (%)
4,750 100,00 4,750 100,00
2,000 99,63 2,000 96,97
1,180 99,12 1,180 95,18
0,850 98,33 0,850 94,23
0,600 97,31 0,600 92,95
0,425 95,71 0,425 90,37
0,250 92,36 0,250 85,22
0,150 88,75 0,150 80,51
0,106 86,86 0,106 77,92
0,075 84,36 0,075 74,54
0,059 82,70 0,059 72,43
0,035 77,43 0,035 64,97
0,028 71,10 0,028 60,32
0,021 65,83 0,021 56,59
0,016 59,50 0,016 51,93
0,012 53,18 0,012 46,34
0,009 46,85 0,009 42,61
0,006 40,52 0,006 36,09
0,004 35,25 0,004 28,64
0,003 29,98 0,003 20,25
0,002 26,81 0,002 18,71

Correlation diagram between the number of shots and relative density for SPT tests

You might also like