TEA Sector OF West Bengal: P B - S S R - R N - 261091117
TEA Sector OF West Bengal: P B - S S R - R N - 261091117
OF
WEST BENGAL
PRESENTED BY-
The experiment was followed by several others, for example Dr. Withcombe, Mr. James
Grant, of the Civil Service, and Captain Samler. The plants, by their healthy and vigorous
growth, gave much promise of the experiment succeeding. Dr. Hooker planted tea in
1848 at Lebong, a thousand feet below Darjeeling where also the tea plants succeeded
admirably.
By 1852 several plantations in various stages of advancement, both of Assam and China
plants were found including the ones at Kurseong and Pankhabari established by Mr.
Martin.
In 1859 the Dhutaria garden was started by Dr. Brougham and between 1860 and 1864
four gardens at Ging, Ambutia, Takdah and Phubsering were established by the
Darjeeling Tea Company and the gardens at Tukver and Badamtam by the Lebong Tea
Company. Other gardens which were started at this early period were those now known
as Maksibari, Pandam&Steinthal Tea Estates.
Indian Tea Industry can be segmented into two geographical divisions ñ North India and
South India.In North, or particularly, Northeast India, Assam and Sikkim are prominent
in producing tea and arebetter known for representing Indian tea quality all across the
globe. For South India, it is, Tamilnadu(Nilgiri), Kerala and Karnataka, who contribute to
the remaining production of tea and majorly coffee.It is to be noted that in the current tea
production scenario, South India produced 129.29 mkg of total volume of 466.37 mkg in
2006 between January to July whereas, North India contributed three times higher
productivity at 337.08 mkg.
The 75% of total tea produced in India goes to France, Germany, Japan,
United Kingdom and United States. Tea exports to big markets like Russian Federation,
United Arab Emirates and Iraq declined sharply due to weaker demands. The Indian
exports continue to loose volume in CIS countries, Europe,US, and some middle-east
countries. However, it succeeded in regaining a part of its share in Iraq when it went up
from 13.36 mkg to 24.73 mkg in 2004. The year 2005 onwards, the exporters somehow
managed to retain earlier trade volume in the Japanese market. Nominal growths have
been registered in UAE and Iran too but dropped in Afghanistan and Pakistan market.
Tea has been the most common drink in the rural India due to its affordability and
healthiness. The Board is taking various health awareness programmers to push
the demand. We expect the robust demand from the rural market to continue.
Tea suffers from staid and non-contemporary image. In order to counter the non-
contemporary image of tea consumption in India, the Tea Board and Ministry of
Commerce has launched promotion campaigns for communicating tea as a
healthy and lifestyle beverage and making it more appealing and contemporary.
These campaigns have been targeting customers from various age groups.
Recently, Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) gave the go-ahead to
set up a Special Purpose Tea Fund (SPTF) under the Tea Board to fund
replantation and rejuvenation activities aimed at improving the age profile of tea
plantations. This is going to benefit the companies having financial constrains but
potential to improve.
The CCEA also gave its approval for providing budgetary support towards
outstanding statutory dues, salary/wages in respect of defaulting CPSEs under the
department of heavy industry. The move is expected to “motivate” employees for
better output and prepare them to achieve the goal of revival of companies.
The Tea Industry both in Assam and West Bengal have discussed with the Trade
Unions for the implementation of productivity linked wage rates for the tea
workers with a view to partially regain the Industry's competitiveness in the
global market. With the implementation of the above policy the operating margins
for the companies in the industry is expected to improve.
The recent developments in the industry give an early signal for the
revival of Industry, but the effects of all will be gradual.
EXPORT GROWTH :
India is largest manufacturer (28 per cent) of tea in the world and an
important exporter (13 per cent of world exports). Further, certain varieties of tea (e.g.
Darjeeling) are grown only in India and are in great demand across the world. Upto July
2005, the domestic tea production was at 458.68 mkg whereby, 320.82 mkg contributed
by North India & 137.86 mkg came from South India. In July 2006, the tea production
recorded growth of 889.17 and total Indian volume at 466.37 wherein, 337.08 & 129.29
contributed by North & SouthIndia respectively. The productivity from southern part
declined while northern region had shown immense growth. However, a year back in
2003-04, the productivity from Northeast declined comparatively. The South Indian
exports were higher by 24.5 mkg where as North India reported areduction of 10.7 mkg.
India accounted for 458.69 mkg out of the total 926.17 mkg of world
tea production in July 2005, and now 466.85 mkg out of the 889.17 mkg of world tea
output in July 2006. The world tea production declined while India registered a
phenomenal growth of +8.16 increases in productivity over last year.
The total exports estimated during the period January to July 2005, were of value
9063277 INR (Rs.) at world tea auction rate @ 57.89 (Rs. kg) with a total of 95.73 (m
kg) qty. exported inclusive of both north and south India as against world exports of
590.60 (m kg). During January to July 2006, the exports were valued of 8309649 INR @
63.65 (Rs. kg) with total of 98.17 (m kg) qty. exported from both the regions as against
world tea exports of 595.22 (m kg). This represents negative skewness in the Indiaís
tea export graph due to low productivity, and decline in prices in the world and domestic
tea auction.Prices came down from the average of Rs.76.43 a kg in 1998 to Rs.61.71 in
2000 and Rs.61.66 in 2001.In 2003, the prices further were Rs. 56.03; in 2004, Rs. 64.57;
and in 2005, Rs.57.89 and till July 2006,Rs.63.65 with strong price variability.
The export situation improved due to the tea imports (for re-
exporting) as the total qty. exported increased from 95.639 mkg to 98.178 mkg, and that
the tea productivity as well as the unit price per kg went comparatively higher from the
northern region than the south as a benchmark of difference in the quality of the yields.
However, the exports from Southern part were higher compared to Northern India yield.
With the help of re-exports the total world exports made by India for tea stood at 95.64
mkg out of the total figure of 590.6 mkg in 2005, which grew marginally, to 98.17 mkg
with +2.44 increments for the period January to July, 2006 out of the total world tea
volume of 595.22. The overall world exports for tea also grew by 4.62 mkg in 2006.
TEA BOARD OF INDIA
Formation : 1953
Website : teaboard.gov.in
The Tea Board India is an Indian Government-controlled organization that regulates the Indian
trade in tea.
It was established by the enactment of the Tea Act in 1953 with its headquarters in Kolkata
(formerly Calcutta). It is headed by the chairman Basudev Banerjee and eparated into Standing
Committees referred to as the Executive Committee, the Development committee, the Labour
Welfare Committee and the Export Promotion Committee.The Tea Board India is responsible for
the assignment of certification numbers to exports of certain tea merchants. This certification is
intended to ensure the teas’ origin, which in turn would reduce the amount of fraudulent labelling
on rare teas such as ones harvested in Darjeeling. The excessive amounts of ‘faux’ Darjeeling tea
sold on the global market relates in stark opposition to the fraction of exporters which are
licensed by the Tea board India as legitimate traders of this region.The Tea Board India’s tasks
include endorsement of the diverse production and productivity of tea, financial support of
research organizations and the monitoring of advances in tea packaging as it relates to health
beneficial aspects.
It coordinates research institutes, the tea trade and government bodies, ensuring the technical
support of the tea trade in the global industry.
INDUSTRY CHARACTERISTICS :
Cyclical in nature :
The Union Budget for 2006-07 has Proposed contribution of Rs 1billion towards Special
Purpose Tea Fund, a 15 year programme,aimed at re-plantation and rejuvenation of tea.
Further, the customs duty on packaging machines proposed to be reduced from 15% to
5%.The allocation of Rs 1 billion towards the Special Purpose Tea Fund is likely to be
helpful for development of the industry. The reduction in customs duty on packaging
machinery is likely to benefit packaged tea manufacturers. Overall the impact of changes
in Union Budget 2006-07 is likely to be positive.
Competition :
Competitive intensity in the Indian tea industry is on the increase
asthe sheer number of players has increased.On account of difficult export market
conditions better realisation in packet tea, more number of Indian players prefer to
concentrate on domestic market.Packaged tea has altered the structure of tea market in
India. Indian tea which were mostly sold in bulk from earlier, are now sold in branded
forms as packet tea and in tea bags. Out of the 0.76 mt of tea consumed in India, around
35-40% is sold in the form of branded products.
Concerns :
One of the major constraint facing the Indian tea industry which
directly affect production, productivity and quality, include the old age of bushes
with more than 30% of the tea area being above the economic threshold age limit.
In addition the slower pace of replantation with the rate of replanting being less
than 0.5% as against the desired level of 2% and the consistent fall in auction
prices during the early-2000 has adversely affected the investment in the
plantations.
• Stiff competition from other producing and exporting countries like SriLanka, China,
Indonesia, Vietnam and Kenya.
• Various tariff and non-tariff measures imposed by some tea importingcountries, lower
off take by Russia due to change in consumer preferences, lower production of orthodox
teas which have a larger demand worldwide.
• Decline in quality of Indian tea which has been caused by mushrooming bought leaf
factories which produce cheap quality tea by buying and processing green leaf from small
growers.
INTERNATIONAL &DOMESTIC PRICES OF TEA
Consistent increase in tea production has led to a global oversupply position, which had
caused the prices to decline. However, in 2004 and 2005, prices have improved.The slow
increase in prices was mainly because of an expected increase in world tea production,
which is estimated to have reached an all-time high. Slightly higher tea prices are also
due to steady demand in major importing countries, such as Pakistan, Russia,Ukraine,
South Africa, and Turkey. In India, average tea prices increased till December 2005,
before declining in January-March 2006.
India and China rank first and second, respectively, both in tea
production & consumption. Both the countries account for nearly half of worldís
tea output exporting about 75 percent of their production,and 25 percent for home
consumption. This is because of high consumption of tea in both these
countries.Their contribution in world tea exports is also equivalent at 17% but the
production accounts for 30% as against 23% of China. Other countries like
Kenya, Sri Lanka and Indonesia produce only 25% of world tea but control 50%
of the global trade. They export more than 90% of their production.
While market prices for tea have been falling, the costs of production have been on the
rise, putting downward pressure on profitability. The rise in costs has been partially
outweighed by increases in yields and productivity, but the extent of this varies across
regions and according to whether it is a smallholding or a plantation.
Governments frequently worsen the problem of high production costs in tea manufacture
by levying excise tax, which is disconnected to the sale price and thus punishes factories
for the production process itself13. Moreover, the final manufactured product is routinely
under-utilised because whatever is left at the final point in the manufacturing cycle gets
dubbed ‘tea residue’, which cannot legally be sold, impeding further use of the leaf by-
product.
The world average for tea yields in 1999 were 1077.1 kg/hectare, but average yields vary
enormously from country to country. At the top end, Kenya produced 2123.4 kg of tea
per hectare in 1999, while Nepal has one of the lowest productivities in the world at 200
kg per hectare.
Sri Lanka has probably the world’s highest cost of tea production – a kilogram of tea was
estimated to cost US$1.47 to produce in 1994. This compares to $1.09 in India and $1.15
in Bangladesh.14 Tea production is land and labour intensive – but both these factors are
getting more and more expensive whilst international commodity prices slip. The
problem is only compounded by soil erosion and the degradation of land fertility caused
by over-intensive farming.
A major determinant of yield and cost of production in each country is labour
productivity. Labour costs account for around half of the unit cost of production and
approximately 75% of that labour cost is on plucking. 15 This explains the high cost of
production in Sri Lanka, where even high-yielding plantations have excess labour, except
during heavy cropping months when they are faced instead with a worker shortage.
Another factor influencing yield is the quality of seedlings and the land. Again, Sri Lanka
tends to retain old low-yielding seedling tea and the land is degraded. Availability of
chemical inputs can also be a factor. Kenyan smallholders have access to fertilisers on
credit from the Kenya Tea Development Agency, which may explain their relatively high
yields.
Differences in yields, cost of production and prices have made the profitability of
tea vary widely across the different countries. Among the various countries the
highest profitability has been obtained by Kenya (over $2000/ha), followed by
India (over $1,400/ha) with the lowest being Sri Lanka (c. $1100/ha).
With rising input costs and falling prices, there is pressure to limit labour costs,
which constitute around 55-60% of the total cost of production for tea. This has
damaging implications for workers on tea estates, who figure as a cost to be
minimised by plantation companies despite the desperate need for an
improvement in their working an living conditions.
SLY COMPETITION :
The domestic consumption dropped to 820.2 mkg from 857.1 mkg i.e. a fall of
36.9 mkg or - 4.3 per cent in 2003-04. There was a slump which was hard rooted,
witnessing lowering productivity and lesser gains from world trade in terms of
export values, whereas Kenyan tea production grew by 10.5 per cent the same
year. Clearly, Kenya eating up the world shares at a higher pace than any other
country did.In 2004, the production raised up to 324.6 mkg from 293.7 mkg.
Kenya increased the production by 25times. Comparatively, as much as 33% of
cultivation area was expanded in India also to increase production but in Kenya, it
got multiplied ten times during the same period.
INDIAN SCENARIO :
Growth in tea production :
In India, tea production increased 3.9% in 2005 to 0.93 mt, as compared
with a 3-year compound average growth rate (CAGR) of 3.9%. The growth was driven
by robust tea production in Assam, the largest tea growing state in the country. However,
declines were reported from West Bengal, while a modest increase in output was reported
from South India. Tea production has grown at a slow rate over the last few years,
because of the closure of up to 70 tea gardens in Assam due to the widespread recession
in the industry. The downturn was further exacerbated by unfavorable weather.
• Tea production during 2006-07 (April 2006 to March 2007) increased by 1.4 %(13.77
Million Kilograms) over the year 2005-06 and was estimated at 944.62 Million
Kilograms as against 930.85 Million Kilograms during 2005-06.
• Decline in tea production during March 2007(50.66 M.Kgs as against 58.12 M.Kgs
during March 2006).
• Tea production during the first three months of 2007 registered a decline of 11.29
M.Kgs as compared to the corresponding period of 2006.
• North Indian tea production declined by 7.37 M.Kgs during January to March 2007
over the same period of 2006 and registered an increase of 18.33 M.Kgs during the
financial year 2006-07 as against 2005-06.
• During March 2007, tea exports from India registered an increase both in volume and
export earnings by 5.47 M.Kgs and Rs.51.71 Crores over March, 2006. Exports during
March, 2007 was estimated at 19.16 Million Kilograms for a value of Rs. 172.22 Crores
with an unit price of Rs.89.87 per Kg., as against 13.69 Million Kilograms for a value of
Rs. 120.51Crores with an unit price of Rs. 88.06 per Kg during March 2006.
• Increase in export of tea from India during 2006-07 was noticed to countries like Iraq
(6.04 M.Kgs.), Afghanistan (5.83 M.Kgs.), Kenya(5.64 M.Kgs.), Pakistan (3.36 M.Kgs.),
A.R.E (2.34 M.Kgs.). A marginal improvement was also noticed in the countries like
Ukraine,Ireland and Turkey during 2006-07 as compared to the corresponding period of
2005-06.
• During 2006-07 there was a decline in exports to CIS countries including Russia (4.08
M.Kgs), UAE (3.18 M.Kgs), UK (2.16 M.Kgs),USA (1.58 M.Kgs), Iran (1.13 M.Kgs). In
addition, marginal decline in exports to Germany, Canada, Poland, Saudi Arabia,
Singapore,Japan, Sri Lanka and Australia was also noticed as compared to the
corresponding period of 2005-06.
CRITICAL ISSUES IN THE TEA SECTOR
Social issues
Low wages :In India workers on smallholder gardens get paid at much
lower rates than at theestates and they have hardly any rights compared
to their plantation counterparts.The wage rates of tea garden workers that
fall under the plantation labour act(estates) are generally fixed through
bipartite agreement between the representatives of employers and
employees of the tea gardens and ranged from approximately USD 1.19
(RS 49, inclusive food grain) in Tiripura to USD 1.90 (RS 78) in West
Bengal in 2007.
Housing: On the large tea estates, workers – permanent but often also
temporary workers -live on the plantation in houses provided by the
plantation company as long as they have work. The housing situation is
often far from ideal, however.
Environmental Issues
Economic issues
Uneven value distribution :The tea value chain comprises all the
stages from green leaf production through conversion into a bulk
packaged product available for blending and sale to consumers.
Value is added to the tea leaves at each stage of the supply chain,
each with associated costs (see also figure 4). This includes the cost
of plucking and sorting, factory packing, internal transport,
warehousing, sales charges (auction and direct), freight, insurance,
interest, blending and packaging and retailers' sales costs. In general
across (agricultural) commodity sectors most added value is created
downstream in the higher processing and retail stages of a supply
chain. The tea value chain is no exception to this rule. While tea is
“ready to drink” when exported by producing countries, the
downstream stages such as blending, packing and marketing are the
most profitable. This part of the value chain is controlled by a
handful of multinational tea packers and brokers, which as a result an
considerably influence world retail and producer prices.
Falling prices :It should be stressed that the auction share of the retail
price as depicted above is a relative share. It may be relatively low, but
in addition that same share has lost its purchasing power on world tea
markets over the years.. While real prices for coffee and cocoa have
plummeted even more, average real tea prices in the years 2000-2005
were roughly half of those in the eighties and 30 percent lower than in
the nineties90. World market tea prices are mostly under pressure
because of a situation of oversupply: global production is outpacing
consumption In addition the cost of production of made tea has
increased due among other things to increasing fuel prices and increased
labour costs91. At the same time,however, real retail prices over the last
two decades have remained constant. In other words, while the real cost
of tea has remained the same for consumers,sourcing costs for retailers
and packers have gone down, as has the income for producers.
Indicative prices for green leaf from smallholders in 2007 (in USD)
CONCLUSION
RECOMMENDATIONS
The case studies all make a number of recommendations that mostly deal with the issues
in their respective countries (see annex). Below we will present some of the more across-
the-board recommendations for the various stakeholders.
1. Adopt and implement CSR policies that improve social, economical and
environmental conditions on and in the vicinity of the plantation or factory
2. Allow for multi-stakeholder monitoring and verification of the social,
economical and environmental standards adopted
3. Provide support to small tea growers through technical, financial and
marketing assistance for market access and quality improvement
4. Enable and facilitate sustainable tea production at supplying smallholders by
paying higher prices and engaging in long-term buying commitments with
producers that produce tea sustainably
5. Not lobby to dilute existing labour legislation which protects workers in the tea
industry, on the grounds of declining returns.
2. Adopt and implement CSR policies that are ambitious but take into
account local realities
3. Conduct multi-stakeholder monitoring and verification of the social and
environmental standards on the tea estates from which tea is procured
4. Take responsibility for conditions throughout the entire tea value chain
and in particular where they have more influence
5. Provide support to small tea growers through technical, financial and
marketing assistance for market access and quality improvement
Governments should:
5. Ensure that labour laws are not violated on the large plantations