Control of Nitrosamine

Impurities in Human Drugs

Guidance for Industry

This guidance is for immediate implementation.

FDA is issuing this guidance for immediate implementation in accordance with 21 CFR
10.115(g)(2). Submit one set of either electronic or written comments on this guidance at any
time. Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to
the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. You should identify all comments with the docket number
listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register.

For questions regarding this document, contact (CDER) Dongmei Lu 240-402-7966.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Food and Drug Administration
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)

September 2020
Pharmaceutical Quality/ Manufacturing Standards/
Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP)
 Control of Nitrosamine
Impurities in Human Drugs
Guidance for Industry

Additional copies are available from:

Office of Communications, Division of Drug Information
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Food and Drug Administration
10001 New Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Bldg., 4th Floor
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Phone: 855-543-3784 or 301-796-3400; Fax: 301-431-6353
Email: [email protected]
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information/guidances-drugs

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Food and Drug Administration
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)

September 2020
Pharmaceutical Quality/ Manufacturing Standards/
Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP)
 Preface
FDA is implementing this guidance without prior public comment because the Agency has
determined that prior public participation is not feasible or appropriate (see Section
701(h)(1)(C)(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) and 21 CFR
10.115(g)(2) and (g)(3)). FDA made this determination because of the importance of providing
timely information to manufacturers regarding risk assessments, testing, and other appropriate
actions they should take to reduce and mitigate nitrosamine impurities in active pharmaceutical
ingredients (APIs) 1 and drug products. This guidance document is being implemented
immediately, but it remains subject to comment in accordance with the Agency’s good guidance
practices.

Comments may be submitted at any time for Agency consideration. Submit written comments to
the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should be identified with the docket number FDA-2020-D-1530 and complete title of
the guidance in the request.

1
The term API used throughout this guidance should be interpreted to mean drug substance, the active ingredient in
a drug product. See 21 CFR 210.3(b)(7) (defining active ingredient) and 314.3 (defining drug substance).
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1
II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 2
A. Nitrosamine Impurities ................................................................................................................. 3
B. General Root Causes for the Presence of Nitrosamine Impurities in APIs .............................. 5
C. Nitrosamine Impurities in Drug Products From Sources Other Than API Contamination .. 9
III. RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................. 9
A. Acceptable Intake Limits ............................................................................................................ 10
B. Recommendations to API Manufacturers ................................................................................. 12
C. Recommendations to Drug Product Manufacturers ................................................................ 14
IV. MAINTAINING THE DRUG SUPPLY ....................................................................... 15
V. REPORTING CHANGES TO FDA.............................................................................. 16
A. Recommended Timeline for Risk Assessment, Confirmatory Testing, and Submission of
Required Changes ........................................................................................................................ 16
APPENDIX A. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES........................................................................... 1
APPENDIX B. FDA DETERMINATION OF THE ACCEPTABLE INTAKE ..................... 1
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

Control of Nitrosamine Impurities in Human Drugs

Guidance for Industry 1

This guidance represents the current thinking of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) on
this topic. It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can
use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. To
discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for this guidance as listed on the title
page.

I. INTRODUCTION

This guidance recommends steps manufacturers of APIs and drug products should take to detect
and prevent unacceptable levels of nitrosamine 2 impurities in pharmaceutical products. 3 The
guidance also describes conditions that may introduce nitrosamine impurities. The recent
unexpected finding of nitrosamine impurities, which are probable human carcinogens, in drugs
such as angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), 4 ranitidine, 5 nizatidine, 6 and metformin, 7 has
made clear the need for a risk assessment strategy for potential nitrosamines in any pharmaceutical
product at risk for their presence.

1
This guidance has been prepared by the Office of Pharmaceutical Quality (OPQ) in the Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research (CDER) at the Food and Drug Administration.
2
The term nitrosamine as used in this guidance means N-nitrosamine.
3
New drug application (NDA) and abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) holders or sponsors, drug master file
(DMF) holders, and owners of marketed products that are not the subject of approved NDAs or ANDAs (such as
compounded products or products marketed under an over-the-counter (OTC) drug monograph) who are not also the
manufacturer of the drug products and APIs should work with their contract manufacturers to take the steps
recommended in this guidance. This applies to drug products currently available on the U.S. market as well as those
with pending applications.
4
The first nitrosamine detected in ARBs was N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), which is a genotoxic and
carcinogenic agent in animals and is classified as probably carcinogenic to humans (Class 2A carcinogen) by the
World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Other nitrosamines,
including N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) and N-nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutanoic acid (NMBA), have also been
detected in various ARB products.
5
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcements-ndma-zantac-
ranitidine
6
See footnote 5.
7
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcements-ndma-metformin

1
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

The discovery of nitrosamines in some types of drug products led FDA and other international
regulators to conduct a detailed analysis of these impurities in affected APIs and drug products. 8,9
Based on the Agency’s current understanding, this guidance discusses potential root causes of
nitrosamine formation and advises API and drug product manufacturers that they should (1)
conduct risk assessments of their approved or marketed products and products with pending
applications, and (2) take appropriate actions to reduce or prevent the presence of nitrosamines in
APIs and drug products.

Although nitrosamine impurities have been found in only some drug products, and batches of those
products have been recalled when there were unacceptable levels 10 of these impurities, nitrosamine
impurities might exist in other APIs and drug products due to use of vulnerable processes and
materials that may produce nitrosamine impurities. Therefore, the recommendations made in this
guidance apply to all chemically synthesized APIs. They also apply to drug products containing
chemically synthesized APIs and to drug products at risk due to other factors described in this
guidance (see sections II.B and C), and not just to the drug products that have been identified in
FDA announcements.

In general, FDA’s guidance documents do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities.

Instead, guidances describe the Agency’s current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only as
recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the
word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not
required.

II. BACKGROUND

FDA has been investigating the presence of nitrosamine impurities in certain drug products. Since
2018, several drug products including ARBs, ranitidine, nizatidine, and metformin have been
found to contain unacceptable levels of nitrosamines.

In June 2018, FDA was informed of the presence of an impurity identified as N-

nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in the ARB valsartan. 11 Through investigation, the Agency
determined that numerous lots of valsartan and a few other ARB drug products from different
manufacturers contained unacceptable levels of nitrosamines. The drug product manufacturers
8
Other regulators with which FDA has been collaborating include the European Medicines Agency (EMA),
European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and Healthcare (EDQM), Health Canada (HC), Therapeutic
Goods Administration (TGA, Australia), Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare/Pharmaceuticals and Medical
Devices Agency (PMDA/MHLW, Japan), Health Sciences Authority, Singapore (HSA, Singapore), and Swissmedic
(Switzerland).
9
FDA’s validated laboratory methods used in assaying nitrosamine impurities in various drugs as well as the
analytical results for various drugs and batches are available at https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-
announcements/fda-statement-fdas-ongoing-investigation-valsartan-impurities-and-recalls-and-update-fdas-current,
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcements-ndma-zantac-
ranitidine, and https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcements-ndma-
metformin.
10
See Table 1 in section III.A. of this guidance.
11
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-statement-fdas-ongoing-investigation-valsartan-
impurities-and-recalls-and-update-fdas-current

2
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

voluntarily recalled the affected batches of these drug products, 12 which led to a drug shortage in
some of the affected products. 13 In addition, FDA evaluated processes that use common amines in
API synthesis and learned that common synthetic pathways could also introduce other types of
nitrosamine impurities besides NDMA.

In September 2019, FDA learned that some common heartburn products (ranitidine, commonly
known as Zantac, and nizatidine, commonly known as Axid) contained unacceptable levels of
NDMA. 14 FDA recommended that manufacturers voluntarily recall ranitidine and nizatidine
products with NDMA levels above what the Agency considers acceptable. 15,16 Recently,
preliminary findings from FDA stability testing raised concerns that NDMA levels in some
ranitidine products stored at room temperature can increase with time to unacceptable levels.
FDA’s preliminary results using accelerated stability testing demonstrated that elevated levels of
NDMA were measured in all products after 2 weeks. FDA’s testing suggests that NDMA levels
increase with storage time. On April 1, 2020, FDA requested that all ranitidine products be
withdrawn from the U.S. market.

In December 2019, FDA became aware that some metformin diabetes medicines in other countries
were reported to have NDMA. In light of this information, FDA acquired samples of metformin to
test for NDMA. By February 2020, the Agency had identified NDMA in some samples but did not
find levels exceeding the acceptable intake limit. In May 2020, further FDA testing revealed that
certain lots of metformin extended-release formulation contained NDMA above the Agency’s
recommended acceptable intake limit. Based on that testing, FDA requested that identified
applicants voluntarily recall these lots of the extended-release metformin. FDA continues to
investigate possible NDMA impurities in metformin and other drug products and will advise
companies on appropriate action.

Because the nitrosamine impurity issue extends beyond the U.S. drug supply, FDA and other
regulatory authorities have partnered to share information, coordinate inspection efforts,
communicate effective analytical methods to detect and identify various nitrosamines, and to
develop rapid solutions to ensure the safety and quality of the drug supply.

A. Nitrosamine Impurities

The term nitrosamine describes a class of compounds having the chemical structure of a nitroso
group bonded to an amine (R1N(-R2)-N=O), as shown in Figure 1. The compounds can form by a
nitrosating reaction between amines (secondary, tertiary, or quaternary amines) and nitrous acid
(nitrite salts under acidic conditions).

12
For a list of recalled products, see FDA’s Recalls, Market Withdrawals, & Safety Alerts web page at
https://www.fda.gov/node/360167.
13
See FDA’s public web page on drug shortages at https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/drug-
shortages and FDA’s list of recalled ARB products at https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-
availability/search-list-recalled-angiotensin-ii-receptor-blockers-arbs-including-valsartan-losartan-and.
14
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcements-ndma-zantac-
ranitidine
15
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/statement-new-testing-results-including-low-levels-
impurities-ranitidine-drugs
16
See footnote 12.

3
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

Figure 1. Representative Reaction to Form Nitrosamines

H
R1 R1
HNO2 -HX
N H R1 N N O X N N O
N O
R2 R2
R2

FDA has identified seven nitrosamine impurities that theoretically could be present in drug
products: NDMA, N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), N-nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutanoic acid
(NMBA), N-nitrosoisopropylethyl amine (NIPEA), N-nitrosodiisopropylamine (NDIPA), N-
nitrosodibutylamine (NDBA), and N-nitrosomethylphenylamine (NMPA) (Figure 2). Five of them
(NDMA, NDEA, NMBA, NIPEA, and NMPA) have actually been detected in drug substances or
drug products.

Figure 2. Chemical Structures of Seven Potential Nitrosamine Impurities in APIs and Drug
Products

N N N N N
N O
O O
N-Nitrosodimethylamine N-Nitrosodiethylamine N-Nitrosomethylphenylamine
(NDMA) (NDEA) (NMPA)

N N N N

O O

N-Nitrosodiisopropylamine N-Nitrosoisopropylethylamine
(NDIPA) (NIPEA)

OH
N N
N
O
N
O
N-Nitrosodibutylamine N-Nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutyric Acid
(NDBA) (NMBA)

4
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

Nitrosamine compounds are potent genotoxic agents in several animal species and some are
classified as probable or possible 17 human carcinogens by the International Agency for Research
on Cancer (IARC). 18 They are referred to as “cohort of concern” compounds in the ICH
guidance for industry M7(R1) Assessment and Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities
in Pharmaceuticals To Limit Potential Carcinogenic Risk (March 2018). 19 The guidance
recommends control of any known mutagenic carcinogen, such as nitroso-compounds, at or
below a level such that there would be a negligible human cancer risk associated with the
exposure to potentially mutagenic impurities. Following the discovery of nitrosamine
contaminants in ARBs, FDA published interim acceptable limits for these impurities. 20 FDA
recommended that manufacturers take action to quantify nitrosamine levels in their drugs and to
reduce or remove these impurities when above the interim limit; FDA has used the interim limits
to guide immediate decision-making for additional evaluation and product recalls 21 while
balancing the risks of potential long-term carcinogen exposure with disruption to clinical
management of patients.

B. General Root Causes for the Presence of Nitrosamine Impurities in APIs

Recent information gathered by FDA suggests several general root causes of the presence of
nitrosamine impurities in APIs:

1. General Conditions That Lead to Nitrosamine Formation

Formation of nitrosamines is possible in the presence of secondary, tertiary, or quaternary amines 22

and nitrite salts 23 under acidic reaction conditions. Under these conditions, nitrite salts may form
nitrous acid, which can react with an amine to form a nitrosamine (see Figure 1). There is a greater
risk of nitrosamine formation if nitrous acid is used to quench residual azide (a reagent commonly
used in tetrazole ring formation or introduction of azide functional group into a molecule) in the
presence of precursor amines.

Nitrites used as reagents in one step can carry over into subsequent steps, despite purification
operations, and react with amines to generate nitrosamine impurities. Therefore, whenever nitrite
salts are present, carryover into subsequent steps cannot be ruled out. In general, processes that use
nitrites in the presence of secondary, tertiary, or quaternary amines are at risk of generating
nitrosamine impurities.

17
NDBA is classified as possibly carcinogenic (2B) by IARC.
18
https://monographs.iarc.fr/list-of-classifications
19
The Agency updates guidances periodically. For the most recent version of a guidance, check the FDA guidance
web page at https://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm.
20
See the 2/28/2019 announcement at https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-
press-announcements-angiotensin-ii-receptor-blocker-arb-recalls-valsartan-losartan.
21
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcements-ndma-zantac-
ranitidine
22
Secondary and tertiary amines may be present as impurities or degradants of quaternary ammonium salts.
23
Secondary, tertiary, and quaternary amines and nitrite also can be called nitrosamine precursors.

5
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

2. Sources of Secondary, Tertiary, and Quaternary Amines That Can Form

Nitrosamines

Amines may be present in a manufacturing process for a variety of reasons. The API (or API
degradants), intermediates, or starting materials may contain secondary or tertiary amine functional
groups. Tertiary and quaternary amines may also be added intentionally as reagents or catalysts.
All of these types of amines can react with nitrous acid or other nitrosating agents to form
nitrosamines. 24,25,26

Amide solvents, which are susceptible to degradation under certain reaction conditions, are another
source of secondary amines. For example, under high reaction temperatures for an extended
reaction period, N,N-dimethylformamide can degrade into dimethylamine, which can react with
nitrous acid to form NDMA (see Figure 3). N-methylpyrrolidone, N,N-dimethylacetamide, and
N,N-diethylacetamide also have similar degradation pathways to form secondary amines that can
react with nitrous acid to form nitrosamine impurities. Secondary amines could also be present as
impurities in amide solvents. For example, dimethylamine, which can react with nitrous acid to
form NDMA, may exist as an impurity in N,N-dimethylformamide.

Figure 3. Formation of NDMA From N,N-Dimethylformamide

C N H+
NH + NaNO2 N N
H
Sodium Nitrite O

Dimethylformamide Dimethylamine N-Nitrosodimethylamine

Tertiary and quaternary amines used as reagents in the synthesis of APIs may contain other amine
impurities. Tertiary amines, such as triethylamine, have been shown to contain low levels of other
secondary amines (such as dipropylamine and isopropylethylamine). Secondary and tertiary
amines may be present as impurities or degradants formed by dealkylation of quaternary amines.
For example, a common phase-transfer catalyst, tetrabutylammonium bromide, may contain
tributyl- and dibutylamine impurities. The amine impurity level that may lead to nitrosamine
contamination of the API is process dependent and should be determined by each API
manufacturer.

This list of the aforementioned sources is not exhaustive, as amine reagents can be used to mediate
a wide range of synthetic transformations. Manufacturers should evaluate other reagents containing
amine functional groups for potential risk of nitrosamine formation.

24
Smith, PAS and RN Loeppky, 1967, Nitrosative cleavage of tertiary amines, J Am Chem Soc, 89(5): 1147–1157
25
Fiddler, W, JW Pensabene, RC Doerr, and AE Wasserman, 1972, Formation of N-nitrosodimethylamine from
naturally occurring quaternary ammonium compounds and tertiary amines, Nature, 236: 307
26
Gillatt, PN, RJ Hart, CL Walters, and PI Reed, 1984, Susceptibilities of drugs to nitrosation under standardized
chemical conditions, Food Chem Toxicol, 22(4): 269–274

6
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

3. Contamination in Vendor-Sourced Raw Materials

Nitrosamine impurities can be introduced when vendor-sourced materials, including starting

materials and raw materials, are contaminated. The Agency has observed the following
contaminations due to this root cause:

• Nitrosamine contamination has occurred when fresh solvents (ortho-xylene, toluene, and
methylene chloride) were contaminated during shipment from vendors (e.g., during transfer
between storage vessels).

• Sodium nitrite is a known impurity in some starting materials (such as sodium azide) and
may be present and react with amines under acidic conditions to form nitrosamines.
Nitrate-containing raw materials, such as potassium nitrate, may contain nitrite impurities.
The amount of nitrite impurity that can be tolerated is process dependent and should be
determined by each API manufacturer.

• Secondary or tertiary amines have been reported as impurities in some raw materials (see
details in section II.B.2 in this guidance) and in fresh solvents such as toluene.

• Starting materials or outsourced intermediates may be at risk through cross-contamination

if they are manufactured at sites where nitrosamine impurities are produced in other
processes.

Awareness of the supply chain of raw materials is an important factor in preventing

contamination. For example, API producers may not be aware of nitrosamine contamination in
raw or starting materials they have sourced from vendors; a producer whose manufacturing
process is not normally susceptible to nitrosamine formation may not realize that vendor-sourced
material may have had impurities introduced during production or transport.

4. Recovered Solvents, Catalysts, and Reagents as Sources of Contamination

Recovered materials such as solvents, reagents, and catalysts may pose a risk of nitrosamine
impurities due to the presence of residual amines (such as trimethylamine or
diisopropylethylamine). If the recovery process involves a quenching step (i.e., nitrous acid used to
decompose residual azide), nitrosamines could form during solvent recovery. These nitrosamines
may be entrained if they have boiling points or solubility properties 27 similar to the recovered
materials, depending on how recovery and subsequent purification takes place (e.g., aqueous
washes or distillation). This further increases the risk of contamination in material recovery. For
these reasons, some drug products using APIs manufactured by certain “low” risk processes 28 were
found to be contaminated. The Agency has observed the following contaminations due to this root
cause:

27
NDMA and NDEA have boiling points of 151–153℃ and 175–177℃, respectively
(https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Both are miscible with water and soluble in organic solvents.
28
“Low” risk processes are those deemed not normally susceptible to nitrosamine formation.

7
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

• A manufacturing site may produce the same API by more than one synthetic process that
uses common solvents. If any of those synthetic processes produces nitrosamines or
contains precursor amines, the solvents sent for recovery are at risk. The use of recovered
solvents that are comingled from different processes or across manufacturing lines without
control and monitoring can introduce nitrosamine impurities. If a recovered solvent is
contaminated in this way and then used to manufacture an API, the API will be
contaminated even if the synthetic route is not normally susceptible to nitrosamine
formation.

• Recovery of raw materials (e.g., solvents, reagents, and catalysts) is often outsourced to
third-party contractors. Process outsourcing can pose a risk if the third-party recovery
facility does not receive enough specific information on the contents of the materials they
are processing and relies solely on routine recovery processes.

• Raw materials can be contaminated if adequate cleaning of equipment between customers,

or between different materials, is not carried out or is not validated as capable of removing
each impurity of concern. It was reported that ortho-xylene and toluene were contaminated
during recovery due to inadequate cleaning and to use of shared storage equipment between
different customers. Inadequate and unvalidated cleaning procedures can also lead to cross-
contamination if precautions to avoid nitrosamine contamination are not in place before
materials from different customers are combined for recovery. For example, the catalyst tri-
N-butyltin chloride (used as a source of tri-N-butyltin azide) was contaminated at a third-
party contractor facility due to the combination of this catalyst from different customers.

5. Quenching Process as a Source of Nitrosamine Contamination

There is a risk of nitrosamine formation when a quenching step is performed directly in the main
reaction mixture (i.e., when nitrous acid is added to the reaction mixture to decompose residual
azide). This allows nitrous acid to come into direct contact with residual amines in the raw
materials used in the manufacturing process. The nitrosamine impurities could be carried to the
subsequent steps if there are not adequate removal or purification operations in place, or if the
operations are not optimized for removing specific impurities of concern. This can contaminate the
entire downstream process once they are introduced. Even if the quenching process is conducted
outside of the main reaction mixture (see section II.B.4 in this guidance), there is a risk if
contaminated recovered materials are introduced into the main process.

6. Lack of Process Optimization and Control

Another potential source of formation of nitrosamine impurities is lack of optimization of the

manufacturing process for APIs when reaction conditions such as temperature, pH, or the sequence
of adding reagents, intermediates, or solvents are inappropriate or poorly controlled. FDA has seen
instances in which reaction conditions varied widely between batches and even between different
processing equipment in the same facility for the same API.

The multiple root causes of nitrosamine contamination listed above can occur within the same API
process. Therefore, multiple strategies may be necessary to identify all potential sources of

8
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

contamination. Typical routine tests (e.g., HPLC) for API purity, identity, and known impurities
are unlikely to detect the presence of nitrosamine impurities. Further, each failure mode could
result in different nitrosamines in different amounts across batches from the same process and the
same API producer, with contamination detected in some batches but not all.

C. Nitrosamine Impurities in Drug Products From Sources Other Than API

Contamination

Nitrites are common nitrosating impurities that have been reported in many excipients at ppm
levels. Nitrite impurities are found in a range of commonly used excipients, which may lead to
nitrosamine impurities forming in drug products during the drug product manufacturing process
and shelf-life storage period. The supplier qualification program 29 should take into account that
nitrite impurities vary across excipient lots and may vary by supplier. Drug product manufacturers
should also be aware that nitrite and nitrosamine impurities may be present in potable water.

Some drug products may undergo degradation pathways that form nitrosamine impurities; this
could potentially occur during drug product storage.

III. RECOMMENDATIONS

Because nitrosamines are probable or possible human carcinogens, FDA recommends that
manufacturers consider the potential causes of nitrosamine formation described in this guidance as
well as any other pathways observed and evaluate the risk for nitrosamine contamination or
formation in their APIs and drug products. Manufacturers should prioritize evaluation of APIs and
drug products based on factors such as maximum daily dose, duration of treatment, therapeutic
indication, and number of patients treated. 30 As new information becomes available and FDA’s
understanding of nitrosamines in drugs evolves, the Agency may recommend that certain drug
products become higher priorities for risk assessment.

Manufacturers should refer to the ICH guidance for industry Q9 Quality Risk Management (June
2006) for details related to quality risk identification, analysis, and management. Manufacturers of
APIs and drug products should take appropriate measures to prevent unacceptable levels of
nitrosamine impurities in their products.

29
In accordance with the ICH guidance for industry Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System (April 2009), the
manufacturer’s pharmaceutical quality system extends to control of the quality of purchased materials. The supplier
qualification program is a manufacturer’s system (e.g., audits, material evaluations, qualification) for selecting
material suppliers who can provide materials using a defined and approved supply chain.
30
For example, a drug product with a maximum daily dose (MDD) of 2000 mg with the same detected level of the
same type of nitrosamine would pose a greater risk than a drug product with a maximum daily dose of 200 mg. A
drug product intended for only short-term use (e.g., a 7-day course of an antibiotic) poses less risk than a drug
product intended for chronic use.

9
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

A. Acceptable Intake Limits

FDA recommends the following acceptable intake (AI) 31 limits for the nitrosamine impurities
NDMA, NDEA, NMBA, NMPA, NIPEA, and NDIPA (Table 1). We further recommend that
manufacturers use these AIs when determining limits for nitrosamine impurities in APIs and drug
products. 32

Table 1. AI Limits for NDMA, NDEA, NMBA, NMPA, NIPEA, and NDIPA in Drug
Products

Nitrosamine AI Limit (ng/day)1,2

NDMA 96
NDEA 26.5
NMBA 96
NMPA 26.5
NIPEA 26.5
NDIPA 26.5
1 The AI limit is a daily exposure to a compound such as NDMA, NDEA, NMBA,NMPA, NIPEA, or NDIPA that
approximates a 1:100,000 cancer risk after 70 years of exposure. Appendix B includes a description of the AI derivation for
NDMA, which is an example of how FDA applied ICH M7(R1) to set a limit.
2 The conversion of AI limit into ppm varies by product and is calculated based on a drug’s maximum daily dose (MDD) as

reflected in the drug label (ppm = AI (ng)/MDD (mg)).

These limits are applicable only if a drug product contains a single nitrosamine. If more than
one of the nitrosamine impurities identified in Table 1 is detected and the total quantity of
nitrosamine impurities exceeds 26.5 ng/day (the AI for the most potent nitrosamines) based
on the maximum daily dose (MDD), the manufacturer should contact the Agency for
evaluation. For drug products with an MDD of less than 880 mg/day, a recommended limit
for total nitrosamines of 0.03 ppm is not more than 26.5 ng/day and is considered acceptable.
For drug products with an MDD above 880 mg/day, the limit for total nitrosamines should be
adjusted so as not to exceed the recommended limit of 26.5 ng/day. 33

If nitrosamines without published AI limits are found in drug products, manufacturers should
use the approach outlined in ICH M7(R1) to determine the risk associated with the
nitrosamine and contact the Agency about the acceptability of any proposed limit. 34

Generally, sensitive methods with limits of quantitation (LOQ) in the parts-per-billion (ppb)
range are needed to meet the low AIs recommended for nitrosamines. Manufacturers of APIs
31
The term acceptable intake (AI) is used in ICH M7(R1) to indicate the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC)
considered for the impurity to be associated with negligible risk of carcinogenicity or other toxic effects. FDA
announcements regarding limits for nitrosamines used the term acceptable daily intake (ADI). For the purposes of
this guidance, the term AI is used rather than ADI.
32
API manufacturers should control nitrosamine impurities to ensure that the drug products in which the APIs are
used will meet the recommended AI limits.
33
Manufacturers should contact [email protected] if multiple nitrosamine impurities are detected
in an API or drug product in which the total nitrosamine level exceeds 26.5 ng/day based on MDD. Inquiries
submitted to this mailbox will be routed to the appropriate FDA office.
34
See footnote 33 for contact information.

10
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

and drug products should use methods with LOQs at or below 0.03 ppm. 35 Manufacturers
should establish methods for which the LOQ and limit of detection (LOD) are as low as
reasonably practical for products for which the maximum daily dose is high (e.g., greater than
1 g). If more than one nitrosamine listed in Table 1 is detected, then the analytical method
should be validated for LOQs below 0.03 ppm to accurately quantify a total nitrosamine level
of not more than 26.5 ng/day. For example, if the MDD is 1200 mg, the LOQ should be below
0.02 ppm. FDA’s public webpage includes validated analytical test methods recommended for
detecting nitrosamine impurities in several different APIs and products. 36,37

API and drug product manufacturers should take the following steps to mitigate nitrosamine
impurities in their products:

1. Assess the risk of nitrosamine impurities in APIs, marketed products, and

products under approved and pending applications. Risk assessments should be
conducted in a timely manner based on the prioritization of drugs. 38
Manufacturers do not need to submit risk assessment documents to the Agency,
but they should retain these documents so that they are available if requested.

2. Conduct confirmatory testing 39 when there is any risk for the presence of
nitrosamine impurities. Due to nitrosamines’ physiochemical properties (low
molecular weights, some volatility and high toxicity), the analytical methods for
nitrosamines need to have specificity, excellent chromatographic separation, and
highly sensitive detection capability.

3. Report changes implemented to prevent or reduce nitrosamine impurities in APIs

and drug products to FDA. This includes submission of any drug master file (DMF)
amendments in accordance with 21 CFR 314.420(c) and changes to approved
applications as required under 21 CFR 314.70 and 314.97 and pending applications
under 21 CFR 314.60 and 314.96.

35
The LOQ may be considered the reporting threshold for nitrosamine impurities (i.e., the limit above which an
impurity should be reported in the certificate of analysis).
36
FDA-recommended analytical methods for detecting nitrosamine impurities can be found at
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcements-ndma-zantac-
ranitidine, at https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcements-ndma-
metformin, and in the 12/12/2018 update at https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm613916.htm.
37
Manufacturers or laboratories are encouraged to make validated test methods publicly available (e.g., by posting
on the method developer’s website) to facilitate faster testing of other similar products. FDA also accepts requests to
post privately developed methods at FDA’s website if FDA’s review of the method protocol finds it is scientifically
sound, and if the method owner provides written authorization for posting by FDA. The manufacturers or
laboratories should send their test methods to [email protected].
38
In accordance with quality management principles, manufacturers should consider manufacturing changes and
shifts over the product lifecycle that may impact the potential for nitrosamine impurities, including new sources of
raw materials or excipients. Risks should be reassessed periodically (see ICH Q9).
39
Testing using appropriately validated methods may be conducted by the API manufacturer or by a qualified
laboratory.

11
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

B. Recommendations to API Manufacturers

While nitrosamines are not expected to form during the manufacture of the vast majority of APIs,
all manufacturers of chemically synthesized APIs should take appropriate actions to mitigate the
risk of nitrosamine contamination for APIs where there is a potential for nitrosamine impurities.

API manufacturers should review their API manufacturing processes and perform risk assessments
to identify the potential for nitrosamine impurities. If a risk of nitrosamine impurities is identified,
confirmatory testing of batches should be conducted using sensitive and appropriately validated
methods. If the risk assessment determines that there is no potential for nitrosamine impurities,
there is no need to take further action. If a nitrosamine impurity is detected, API manufacturers
should investigate the root cause. They should implement changes in the manufacturing process to
reduce or prevent nitrosamine impurities. 40

1. Mitigating the Presence of Nitrosamine Impurities in APIs

FDA recommends that API manufacturers take the following actions:

• API manufacturers should optimize the design of the manufacturing process for APIs
during route of synthesis (ROS) development to minimize or prevent the formation of
nitrosamine impurities. API manufacturers should refer to the recommendations in ICH
M7(R1) and the ICH guidances for industry Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice Guidance
for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (September 2016) and Q11 Development and
Manufacture of Drug Substances (November 2012) in this respect. The following factors
should be considered during process development:

o Avoiding reaction conditions that may produce nitrosamines whenever possible;

when not possible, demonstrating that the process is adequately controlled and is
capable of consistently reducing nitrosamine impurities through appropriate and
robust fate and purge studies.

o Using bases other than secondary, tertiary, or quaternary amines (when possible) if
ROS conditions may form nitrosamines.

o Using caution when the ROS involves the use of amide solvents (e.g., N,N-
dimethylformamide, N,N-dimethylacetamide, and N-methylpyrrolidone).

o Replacing nitrites with other quenching agents for azide decomposition processes.

o Optimizing and consistently controlling the sequences of reactions, processes, and

reaction conditions (such as pH, temperature, and reaction time).

o Designing a manufacturing process that facilitates the purge of nitrosamine

impurities in the subsequent processing steps.

40
See section V in this guidance for reporting changes to approved applications and DMFs.

12
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

• API manufacturers should consider removing quenching steps (when there is a risk of
nitrosamine formation, e.g., using nitrous acid to decompose residual azide) from the main
reaction mixture to reduce the risk of nitrosamine formation. The API, or an intermediate
formed through a reaction using an azide salt, can be separated from the mother liquor into
the organic phase. The aqueous waste phase separated from the organic phase should then
be quenched with nitrous acid without contacting the API, its intermediate, or solvents
intended for recovery.

• API manufacturers should audit their supply chains and monitor them for any at-risk raw
materials, starting materials, and intermediates. 41 API manufacturers should maintain
records including the name of the raw material manufacturer and its supplier, 42 roles of the
actual manufacturers of such materials, and any repackers and distributors who handle the
materials before API manufacture. When appropriate, API manufacturers should establish
controls and consider additional specifications for at-risk materials to prevent nitrosamine
contamination.

• To avoid cross-contamination when recovered materials such as solvents, reagents, and

catalysts are used in the manufacturing process, recovered material should be used only in
the same step or in an earlier step (if there is sufficient purification) of the same process
from which it was collected. The recovered materials should meet appropriate standards
before reuse. If the recovery of materials is outsourced to third-party contractors, the API
manufacturer should audit the contractors’ validation of cleaning procedures. API
manufacturers should follow recommendations in ICH Q7 for ensuring that cross-
contamination with nitrosamine or nitrosamine precursors can be prevented. API
manufacturers should also verify with their suppliers whether the purchased materials used
in their processes are recovered.

• API manufacturers should be aware that potable water used in API manufacture may
contain low levels of nitrite and even nitrosamines from environmental contamination. 43
The existence of nitrites in processing water may lead to nitrosamine contamination in API
manufacture. Therefore, to avoid unacceptable levels of nitrosamine impurities in APIs,
API manufacturers should analyze nitrite and nitrosamine levels in water and use water that
has been purified to remove unacceptable impurities.

If a nitrosamine is introduced to the API through exogenous sources 44 that can be avoided,
manufacturers should eliminate the source of contamination.

• API batches may be reprocessed or reworked to control the level of nitrosamine impurities
as provided in ICH Q7 for amending and controlling such operations. If a batch is found to

41
For a description of “at-risk materials,” see section II.B in this guidance.
42
ICH Q7
43
See the latest version of the WHO’s Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality at
https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/water-quality/guidelines/en/.
44
Exogenous sources, for the purposes of this guidance, refer to materials such as solvents and raw materials used in
synthesis or processing that may introduce contamination.

13
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

contain nitrosamine and is reprocessed or reworked in any way, these operations should be
conducted under oversight of the quality unit.

2. Control of Nitrosamine Impurities in APIs

If a nitrosamine impurity is detected above the LOQ, the API manufacturer should develop a
strategy to ensure that the nitrosamine level remains within the AI limit. Manufacturers should
develop an appropriate control strategy, which should include specification limits, to ensure that
the nitrosamine level reliably remains well below the AI limit in the API. Given existing
uncertainties regarding nitrosamine impurities and their presence in drugs, for APIs with an
impurity detected above the LOQ or at-risk APIs, testing of each batch on release should be
conducted. Alternate approaches (e.g., upstream test of an intermediate) should be supported by
sufficient process understanding and evidence of adequate statistical control and should be
submitted to FDA in a supplement prior to implementation. 45

Any API batch found to contain levels of nitrosamine impurities above the recommended AI
should not be released by the API manufacturer for distribution unless, with prior FDA agreement,
the API is needed to prevent or mitigate a shortage of a drug.

C. Recommendations to Drug Product Manufacturers

Drug product manufacturers should conduct risk assessments to determine the potential for
nitrosamine impurities in drug products. A risk assessment should involve collaboration with the
API manufacturer to aid in the identification of the API ROS or other process conditions of the
API’s manufacture that put the drug product at risk for nitrosamine impurities. The risk assessment
should also include evaluation of any pathway (including degradation) that may introduce
nitrosamines during drug product manufacture or storage. If the risk assessment determines that
there is no potential for nitrosamine impurities, there is no need to take further action.

If a risk of nitrosamines in a drug product is identified, confirmatory testing of batches should be

conducted using sensitive and appropriately validated methods. 46 If a nitrosamine impurity is
detected, manufacturers should investigate the root cause and implement changes in the
manufacturing process to mitigate or reduce nitrosamine impurities. 47

1. Control of Nitrosamine Impurities in Drug Products

Drug product manufacturers must test representative samples of all incoming components,
including lots of at-risk API, prior to use, as required under 21 CFR 211.84. 48 To meet the CGMP

45
All changes in specifications from those in the approved application must be submitted in a prior approval
supplement unless otherwise exempted by regulation or guidance (see 21 CFR 314.70(b)(2)) and the guidance for
industry Changes to an Approved NDA or ANDA (April 2004)).
46
Testing using appropriately validated methods may be conducted by the API manufacturer or by a qualified
laboratory.
47
See section V in this guidance for reporting changes to approved applications and DMFs.
48
At-risk APIs include APIs with secondary, tertiary, and quaternary amine functional groups. They also include
any API with an ROS using at-risk materials (see section II.B in this guidance).

14
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

regulations in 21 CFR 211 subpart E and be consistent with the ICH guidance for industry Q10
Pharmaceutical Quality System (April 2009), drug product manufacturers should continue testing
API lots until they have verified that the API supplier can consistently manufacture API without
unacceptable levels of nitrosamine.

Drug product manufacturers, when designing their control strategy, should evaluate whether
nitrites could be present during manufacturing processes where at-risk APIs are used. They should
also evaluate whether nitrosamines could form in a finished drug product over the drug product’s
shelf life. If a nitrosamine is introduced to the drug product through exogenous sources that can be
avoided, manufacturers should eliminate the source of contamination.

If a nitrosamine impurity is detected above the LOQ, the manufacturer should develop a strategy to
ensure that the nitrosamine level remains within the AI limit. The control strategy should include
specification limits for the identified nitrosamine. Such a control strategy is also recommended
when the introduction of nitrosamine is inherent due to the API structure, the API ROS, or the
manufacturing process of the API or drug product. Given existing uncertainties regarding
nitrosamine impurities and their presence in drugs, testing of each batch on release should be
conducted. Alternate approaches should be supported by sufficient process understanding and
evidence of adequate statistical control and should be submitted to FDA in a supplement prior to
implementation. 49

If drug product batches with unacceptable levels of nitrosamine impurities are already in
distribution, drug product manufacturers should contact FDA so the Agency can determine the
regulatory action for the specific drug products. Any drug product batch found to contain levels
of nitrosamine impurities at or above the recommended AI should not be released by the drug
product manufacturer for distribution. Manufacturers should contact the Agency if a recall is
initiated. 50 Under section 501 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), 51 a drug that is
not manufactured, processed, packed, or held in conformity with CGMP to ensure that the drug
meets certain quality and purity standards is considered adulterated. FDA may exercise
regulatory discretion when warranted to prevent or mitigate a shortage of a drug.

IV. MAINTAINING THE DRUG SUPPLY

If any manufacturing changes or recalls are likely to lead to a disruption in the drug supply,
manufacturers should immediately contact CDER’s Drug Shortage Staff at
[email protected]; FDA can work with manufacturers to mitigate the risk of nitrosamine
impurities in APIs and drug products while avoiding interruptions in the drug supply. Contacting
the Drug Shortage Staff can assist manufacturers in meeting any obligations to report
discontinuances or interruptions in their drug manufacture under section 506C of the FD&C Act
and implementing regulations under 21 CFR 314.81(b)(3)(iii). It also allows FDA to consider, as

49
All changes in specifications from those in the approved application must be submitted in a prior approval
supplement unless otherwise exempted by regulation or guidance (see 21 CFR 314.70(b)(2)(i)) and the guidance for
industry Changes to an Approved NDA or ANDA (April 2004)).
50
Manufacturers can contact the recall coordinator assigned to the product type and location. Contact information
for recall coordinators is available at https://www.fda.gov/safety/industry-guidance-recalls/ora-recall-coordinators.
51
See 21 U.S.C. 351.

15
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

soon as possible, what actions, if any, may be needed to avoid shortages and protect the health of
patients who depend on the affected products.

V. REPORTING CHANGES TO FDA

Drug manufacturers must report changes implemented to prevent or reduce nitrosamine

impurities in accordance with FDA regulations (21 CFR 314.60, 314.70, 314.96, and 314.97).

If an API DMF holder makes process changes in the ROS as a result of the risk assessment and
confirmatory testing, the DMF holder must submit amendments and inform each drug product
manufacturer that references the DMF (including pending and approved applications), in
accordance with 21 CFR 314.420(c). If the API is manufactured by the applicant and not covered
by a DMF, the manufacturer must report such ROS changes in the application in accordance with
21 CFR 314.70 and 21 CFR 314.97. If a batch of API is found to contain a nitrosamine and is
reprocessed or reworked in any way, these operations should be reported in the DMF or
application (as applicable).

Although each DMF may contain only a single synthetic route, if a change in synthetic process is
needed to avoid nitrosamine contamination and it is not possible to immediately stop using the
original manufacturing process, the API manufacturer should submit both processes in the DMF
and provide an estimate for the earliest feasible timeframe for the removal of the original
process. The different synthetic processes should be identified by separate codes to designate
batches manufactured through each process. If the original process cannot be discontinued within
a reasonable timeframe, the new or revised process should be submitted in a separate DMF.

If changes to the drug product are needed to prevent nitrosamine formation, application holders
must submit a supplement to notify FDA of any changes to conditions established in the
approved applications beyond the variations already provided for in their applications, as
required by 21 CFR 314.70 and 314.97. Holders of pending applications must update their
applications through submission of an amendment according to 21 CFR 314.60 and 314.96.
Section V of this guidance includes additional information on reporting changes in APIs and
drug products.

A. Recommended Timeline for Risk Assessment, Confirmatory Testing, and

Submission of Required Changes

FDA recommends different implementation timelines depending on the regulatory status of the
drug product. 52

52
New drug application (NDA) and abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) holders or sponsors, drug master file
(DMF) holders, and owners of marketed products that are not the subject of approved NDAs or ANDAs (such as
compounded products or products marketed under an over-the-counter (OTC) drug monograph) who are not also the
manufacturer of the drug products and APIs should work with their contract manufacturers to take the steps
recommended in this guidance. This applies to drug products currently available on the U.S. market as well as those
with pending applications.

16
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

1. Approved or Marketed Drug Products

To ensure the safety of the U.S. drug supply, manufacturers should conclude a risk assessment of
approved or marketed products within 6 months of publication of this guidance. Confirmatory
testing should start as soon as the risk of nitrosamine is identified from the risk assessment and
should begin immediately for products considered at high risk. To ensure the safety of the U.S.
drug supply, confirmatory testing of drug products and submission of required changes in drug
applications should be concluded within 3 years of the date of publication of this guidance. FDA
acknowledges that the implementation timeline includes investigating the root cause of the
contamination or formation, identifying changes that will eliminate the root cause (e.g., change
in manufacturing process, change in supplier), and confirming that any proposed changes will
minimize the risk of nitrosamine contamination or formation without otherwise adversely
affecting product quality. The timelines also include activities conducted by API manufacturers
(i.e., risk assessment and testing) to support the drug products in which they are used. FDA may
request an expedited risk assessment, confirmatory testing, or other regulatory action based on
information available to the Agency.

2. Pending Applications

a. Pre-Submission Stage

FDA recommends that applicants conduct a risk assessment for nitrosamine impurities in APIs
and proposed drug products and conduct confirmatory testing as needed prior to submission of
an original application. However, the risk assessment and submission of confirmatory testing, if
needed, and changes to the DMF or application may be submitted in an amendment if they are
not available at the time of the original submission filing. Such an amendment should be
submitted as quickly as possible after the original submission filing to minimize any potential
adverse impact on the application assessment timeline. 53

b. Applications Pending With the Agency

Applicants with pending applications should conduct the risk assessment expeditiously and
inform FDA if confirmatory testing finds nitrosamine levels above the AI limit.54 If a
nitrosamine impurity is detected above the LOQ but is within the AI limit, the applicant should
amend the application as appropriate. The Agency will work with the applicant to resolve issues
during the review cycle or immediately after approval, and before distribution, if determined to
be necessary by the Agency. 55

53
For NDA submissions, manufacturers should discuss the need for an amendment with the Agency at the pre-NDA
stage.
54
For NDAs, the applicant should contact the specific product’s review division. For ANDAs, the applicant should
contact the project manager specified for the ANDA.
55
In certain cases, FDA may consult with CDER’s Drug Shortage Staff to ensure adequate supply on the U.S.
market.

17
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

FDA generally will adhere to review goals established as part of the Prescription Drug User Fee
Act reauthorization for years 2018–2022 (PDUFA VI) and the Generic Drug User Fee
Amendments Reauthorization of 2017 (GDUFA II).

18
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

1 APPENDIX A. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

2
3 The recommendations on reporting changes in APIs and drug products in this guidance are in
4 accordance with the FDA’s current regulations and guidances. The following guidances 1 are
5 generally relevant to API and drug product impurities, including reporting changes of controls
6 for impurities and application submission information: 2
7 • Guidance for industry SUPAC-IR: Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Scale-Up
8 and Post-Approval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls, In Vitro Dissolution
9 Testing, and In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation (November 1995)
10 • Guidance for industry SUPAC-SS: Nonsterile Semisolid Dosage Forms; Scale-Up and
11 Post-Approval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls; In Vitro Release Testing
12 and In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation (May 1997)
13 • Guidance for industry SUPAC-MR: Modified Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Scale -Up
14 and Postapproval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls; In Vitro Dissolution
15 Testing and In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation (October 1997)
16 • Guidance for industry Changes to an Approved NDA or ANDA (April 2004)
17 • ICH guidance for industry Q9 Quality Risk Management (June 2006)
18 • ICH guidance for industry Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System (April 2009)
19 • ICH guidance for industry Q11 Development and Manufacture of Drug Substances
20 (November 2012)
21 • Guidance for industry CMC Postapproval Manufacturing Changes To Be Documented in
22 Annual Reports (March 2014)
23 • ICH guidance for industry Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice Guidance for Active
24 Pharmaceutical Ingredients (September 2016)
25 • ICH guidance for industry M7(R1) Assessment and Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic)
26 Impurities in Pharmaceuticals To Limit Potential Carcinogenic Risk (March 2018)
27 • Draft guidance for industry Postapproval Changes to Drug Substances (September 2018) 3
28

1
The Agency updates guidances periodically. For the most recent version of a guidance, check the FDA guidance
web page at https://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm.
2
This guidance is not intended to cover all of the current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) requirements that
are relevant. The DMF and drug product reporting provisions are the main focus in this section of the guidance.
3
When final, this guidance will represent FDA’s current thinking on this topic.

1
 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

29 APPENDIX B. FDA DETERMINATION OF ACCEPTABLE INTAKE LIMITS

30
31 Identification of the acceptable intake (AI) values listed in section III of this guidance follows
32 the procedures recommended in the ICH guidance for industry M7(R1) Assessment and Control
33 of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities in Pharmaceuticals To Limit Potential Carcinogenic
34 Risk (March 2018). 1 A compound-specific AI can be calculated based on rodent carcinogenicity
35 potency data such as TD50 values (doses giving a 50% tumor incidence equivalent to a cancer
36 risk probability level of 1:2) identified in the public literature. Linear extrapolation to a
37 probability of 1 in 100,000 (i.e., the accepted lifetime risk level used) is achieved by simply
38 dividing the TD50 by 50,000. The AI (in mg/kg/day units) can then be converted to mg/day by
39 multiplying by the human body weight (50 kg is the assumed body weight identified in the
40 referenced guidance). Linear extrapolation from a TD50 value is considered appropriate to derive
41 an AI for M7 Class 1 impurities (known mutagenic carcinogens) with no established threshold
42 mechanism. In many cases, the carcinogenicity data are available from the Carcinogenicity
43 Potency Database (CPDB). When the CPDB contains a pre-calculated TD50 value for a selected
44 chemical, this value may be used to calculate the AI. Where carcinogenicity study data for an
45 impurity are of lesser quality as described in ICH M7, a surrogate compound with
46 carcinogenicity data may be used to derive an acceptable intake but should be scientifically
47 justified.
48
49 A summary of the AI derivation for NDMA is provided as an example. NDMA was identified as
50 a mutagenic carcinogen in several species and is listed as a probable human carcinogen by the
51 Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)
52 program. TD50 values for NDMA are 0.0959 mg/kg/day (rat, based on Peto et al. 2) and 0.189
53 mg/kg/day (mouse) according to the CPDB. 3 For the AI calculation, the lower (more
54 conservative) value of the rat is used. The resulting AI associated with a 1 in 100,000 cancer risk
55 over 70 years of exposure is calculated by dividing the TD50 by 50,000 and then multiplying by
56 50 to account for a patient with a 50-kg body weight, resulting in 0.0000959 mg/day NDMA, or
57 approximately 96 ng/day NDMA.
58
59 Hence, a daily lifelong intake of 96 ng/day NDMA corresponds to a theoretical cancer risk of
60 10-5 and therefore represents an AI when present as an impurity.
61

1
The Agency updates guidances periodically. For the most recent version of a guidance, check the FDA guidance
web page at https://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm.
2
Peto, R, R Gray, P Brantom and P Grasso, 1991, Dose and time relationships for tumor induction in the liver and
esophagus of 4080 inbred rats by chronic ingestion of N-nitrosodiethylamine or N-nitrosodimethylamine, Cancer
Research, 51: 6452–6469
3
Carcinogenicity Potency Database entry for N-nitrosodimethylamine (CAS 62-75-9) (NDMA) accessed at
https://www.nlm.nih.gov/databases/download/cpdb.html