Plantar and Medial Heel Pain: Diagnosis and Management: Review Article
Plantar and Medial Heel Pain: Diagnosis and Management: Review Article
Plantar and Medial Heel Pain: Diagnosis and Management: Review Article
Abstract
Craig R. Lareau, MD Heel pain is commonly encountered in orthopaedic practice.
Gregory A. Sawyer, MD Establishing an accurate diagnosis is critical, but it can be challenging
due to the complex regional anatomy. Subacute and chronic plantar
Joanne H. Wang, BA
and medial heel pain are most frequently the result of repetitive
Christopher W. DiGiovanni, MD microtrauma or compression of neurologic structures, such as plantar
fasciitis, heel pad atrophy, Baxter nerve entrapment, calcaneal stress
fracture, and tarsal tunnel syndrome. Most causes of inferior heel pain
From the Alpert Medical School, Brown
University, Providence, RI (Dr. Lareau,
can be successfully managed nonsurgically. Surgical intervention is
Dr. Sawyer, and Ms. Wang), the Rhode reserved for patients who do not respond to nonsurgical measures.
Island Hospital, Providence (Dr. Lareau Although corticosteroid injections have a role in the management of
and Dr. Sawyer), and Harvard Medical
School and the Massachusetts General select diagnoses, they should be used with caution.
Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr. DiGiovanni).
Dr. Sawyer or an immediate family
member serves as a paid consultant to
Mitek. Dr. DiGiovanni or an immediate
family member has received royalties
from Extremity Medical; is a member of
H eel pain is a common complaint
among orthopaedic patients.
Establishing an accurate diagnosis can
ing exercises, physical therapy, pre-
fabricated shoe inserts, and custom
orthoses. Such measures are effective in
a speakers’ bureau or has made paid be challenging due to the complex most patients, especially when both the
presentations on behalf of BioMimetic
Therapeutics, Extremity Medical, and
regional anatomy and the close prox- patient and physician allow adequate
Wright Medical Technology; serves as imity of potential pain generators. The time for them to work. Corticosteroid
a paid consultant to BESPA, BioMimetic differential diagnosis should include injections should be used sparingly.
Therapeutics, Extremity Medical, and vascular, infectious, oncologic, and Although these are considered by many
Wright Medical Technology; has stock
or stock options held in Extremity
systemic causes. Subacute and chronic to be capable of accelerating recovery,
Medical and Wright Medical heel pain are most commonly due to the current literature demonstrates only
Technology; has received research or repetitive microtrauma or compres- short-term benefit and indicates a con-
institutional support from BioMimetic sion of neurologic structures. stellation of notable potential side
Therapeutics and Wright Medical
Technology; and has received
Typically, diagnosis can be made effects.1-6 Surgical intervention is indi-
nonincome support (such as equipment based on a detailed history and physical cated for carefully selected patients
or services), commercially derived examination that allow the clinician to with recalcitrant pain whose symptoms
honoraria, or other non–research- pinpoint the location of maximal ten- have persisted despite an appropriate
related funding (such as paid travel)
from CuraMedix and Performance
derness (Figure 1). Weight-bearing course of nonsurgical measures. Further
Orthotics. Neither of the following plain radiographs should be obtained study is needed to determine the efficacy
authors nor any immediate family to assess alignment and degenerative of the relatively new treatment modal-
member has received anything of value changes and to exclude fracture and ities, including platelet-rich plasma
from or has stock or stock options held
in a commercial company or institution
other skeletal abnormalities. Advanced (PRP) injection and extracorporeal
related directly or indirectly to the subject imaging studies and electromyography shock wave therapy (ESWT).
of this article: Dr. Lareau and Ms. Wang. (EMG) can be used to confirm or
J Am Acad Orthop rule out certain diagnoses and to
provide additional information when
Plantar Fasciitis
Surg 2014;22:372-380
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/
the diagnosis is uncertain.
In general, initial management should Epidemiology, Anatomy, and
JAAOS-22-06-372
consist of one or more nonsurgical Pathophysiology
Copyright 2014 by the American
Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. modalities, including rest, shoe wear Plantar fasciitis (PF) represents the
modification, NSAIDs, home stretch- most common cause of heel pain in
Copyright Ó the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Craig R. Lareau, MD, et al
Copyright Ó the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Plantar and Medial Heel Pain: Diagnosis and Management
digitorum brevis (FDB) origin and effective as more costly custom in the management of PF. Of eight
do not lie in the true substance of the orthoses.23 Following a dedicated double-blind placebo-controlled ran-
plantar fascia itself.18 trial of such treatment measures, 90% domized clinical studies, four con-
MRI is rarely required for the diag- to 95% of patients experience reso- cluded that ESWT significantly
nosis of PF. It is perhaps better used to lution of symptoms within 1 year.12 improved some short-term outcome
rule out alternative pathologies, such as For the small number of refractory measures.33-36 The remainder dem-
calcaneal stress fracture. In the patient patients, more invasive techniques, onstrated no significant differences in
with PF, MRI usually demonstrates such as injection and ESWT, may be any outcome measure.32,37-39 One
thickening of the plantar fascia—one considered. study demonstrated that plantar fas-
study showed it to be twice the In level I trials, corticosteroid in- cial stretching exercises were superior
thickness of healthy controls—and jections have resulted in significantly to ESWT.24
edema within the soft tissues.19 Edema improved pain relief in patients with Level I studies investigating pulsed
in the medial calcaneal tuberosity, PF at 4 weeks compared with pla- radiofrequency electromagnetic field
however, is only variably present on cebo.2,6 These same studies, however, therapy40 and botulinum toxin A
MRI. also suggest that corticosteroid in- injection41 for the management of PF
jections may only provide short-term have failed to demonstrate a significant
pain relief; injection did not provide difference compared with placebo.
Management significant pain relief compared with Neither has PRP injection demon-
In all cases, initial management should placebo at 3-month follow-up. strated comparative superiority over
be nonsurgical. Rest, structured phys- Corticosteroid injections are associ- corticosteroid injection in the man-
ical therapy, home stretching exercises, ated with a risk of plantar fascia rup- agement of PF.42
heel cushions, orthoses, ice, NSAIDs, ture.28 This finding was observed in Surgery for recalcitrant disease most
and weight loss all have been linked to 2.4% of patients who received corti- often entails partial plantar fasciotomy
the successful nonsurgical manage- costeroid injections.29 In a survey of without heel spur resection. In the past
ment of PF.20-26 Barefoot activities and members of the American Orthopae- two decades, endoscopic techniques
wearing shoes with inadequate cush- dic Foot and Ankle Society, this have gained in popularity due to
ioning and support should be avoid- complication was found to occur an the purported advantage of a more
ed.12 Shoe wear modifications, such average of 1.5 times per provider over rapid postoperative recovery.43 Open
as use of a rocker sole, have been the course of their careers.4 Plantar plantar fasciotomy, the traditional
shown to reduce dorsiflexion of the fascia rupture itself is not believed to be mainstay of surgical management,
first metatarsophalangeal joint and a common sequela of injection. Long- has been shown to provide pain relief
thereby decrease the peak tensile strain term consequences of rupture include in 76% of patients.18 In a recent level
of the plantar fascia.27 Stretching longitudinal arch strain, lateral and IV study, endoscopic plantar fas-
specific to the plantar fascia has dorsal midfoot strain, lateral plantar ciotomy completely relieved symp-
recently been shown to provide supe- nerve dysfunction, stress fracture, and toms in 76% of patients and was
rior pain relief when compared with hammer toe deformity.28,30 Other associated with a low complication
Achilles tendon stretching at 8 weeks; potential side effects of corticosteroid rate.44
however, no significant difference was injection include skin and fat atrophy Gastrocnemius recession may be
seen at 2-year follow-up.21 In a level I at the injection site, postinjection considered for the patient with PF
study, celecoxib was shown to provide flare, inadvertent intraneural/intra- and a concomitant gastrocnemius
short-term pain reduction compared vascular injection, hyperglycemia in contracture. In a retrospective series,
with placebo.22 patients with diabetes, tendon rup- 25 patients with PF and isolated
Other management options include ture, infection, and facial flushing.31 gastrocnemius contracture experi-
night splinting, prescription orthoses, Of these, postinjection flare, facial enced significant pain relief after
and a period of immobilization.12 flushing, and skin and fat atrophy are gastrocnemius recession, with the
Night splints are designed to prevent the most common. Systemic compli- average visual analog scale score
and correct passive contracture of cations are rare.31 decreasing from 8.1 to 1.9.14 In
the plantar fascia and gastrocnemius- ESWT uses acoustic waves that elicit 2012, Abbassian et al45 reported
soleus complex. In one study, foot an inflammatory response; in theory, that proximal gastrocnemius release
orthoses were found to improve pain this leads to neovascularization and resulted in complete or significant
and function at 3 months but not healing.32 Level I and II evidence, pain relief for 81% of patients; 58%
at 12 months.23 Prefabricated shoe however, have not convincingly dem- of patients experienced relief within
inserts have been shown to be as onstrated it to be superior to placebo 2 weeks of surgery.
Copyright Ó the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Craig R. Lareau, MD, et al
Copyright Ó the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Plantar and Medial Heel Pain: Diagnosis and Management
Anatomy and
Pathophysiology
The calcaneus is the largest tarsal bone
and is subject to considerable weight-
bearing stresses on a routine basis.
Despite these chronic loads, however,
the bone remains predominantly can-
cellous in nature. As a result, stress
fractures of the calcaneus are not
uncommon; typically, they occur
immediately posterior and inferior to
the posterior facet12 (Figure 3). The
calcaneus is one of the most common
locations of stress fracture in the foot,
second only to the metatarsals.19
Calcaneal stress fractures occur
most frequently in athletes, military
trainees, and elderly patients with
osteopenia. These injuries are caused
by repetitive overload and the
inability of bone formation to match
Illustration of a left heel showing the potential sites of compression of the Baxter resorption. A thorough history often
nerve: the deep margin of the abductor hallucis muscle (1) and the point at which
the nerve passes anterior to the medial calcaneal tuberosity (2). elicits changes in exercise or activity,
typically involving recent adoption of
a more rigorous exercise regimen.
Copyright Ó the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Craig R. Lareau, MD, et al
the trabecular pattern of the calcaneus tunnel. The tarsal tunnel is a fibro- Figure 3
2 to 8 weeks after symptom onset,56 osseous space located posterior and
although these images are frequently distal to the medial malleolus. Its roof
interpreted as normal during the early is formed by the flexor retinaculum,
course of this disease process (Figure 3). and the medial wall of the calcaneus
The rare finding of a linear sclerotic serves as its floor. The posterior tibial
line in the tuberosity perpendicular to neurovascular bundle passes through
the natural trabecular pattern indicates this tunnel, along with the tendons of
the presence of a healing stress frac- the tibialis posterior, flexor digitorum
ture.19,57 During the early stages of longus, and flexor hallucis longus
fracture, radiographic sensitivity can muscles. The tibial nerve divides into
be as low as 10%, but follow-up the medial and lateral plantar nerves
radiography reveals diagnostic fea- as well as the medial calcaneal branch.
tures in 50% of patients.19,56 When TTS is a relatively uncommon clinical
pain persists but radiographs appear entity that may be overdiagnosed. Lateral foot radiograph
normal, MRI or bone scanning may be Pes planus is one of the more com- demonstrating a calcaneal stress
fracture (arrow). (Reproduced with
helpful to establish the diagnosis. monly purported causes of TTS because
permission from Spitz DJ, Newberg
Technetium bone scans typically detect hindfoot valgus and forefoot abduction AH: Imaging of stress fractures in the
a stress fracture 1 to 2 weeks before place the nerve under tension.58 Other athlete. Radiol Clin North Am
changes become apparent radio- reported causes include fracture, space- 2002;40[2]:313-331.)
graphically.57 MRI demonstrates high occupying lesions, tenosynovitis, and
signal intensity due to marrow edema an accessory abductor hallucis mus- such as the dorsiflexion-eversion test,
and hemorrhage on T2-weighted im- cle.19,58,59 Systemic inflammatory which stretches the tibial nerve, may
ages.19 MRI is superior to bone scan- arthropathy, diabetes, and rheumatoid also elicit reproducible discomfort in
ning because it enables concomitant arthritis may also play a role in the this anatomic region.
evaluation of soft-tissue structures.57 development of TTS.60 This syndrome
is not typically bilateral, so systemic
and spinal pathology should be Diagnosis
Management
excluded first in patients who present MRI is the modality of choice for eval-
Treatment consists of activity modi- with neurologic findings in both feet. uating the anatomy of the tarsal tunnel
fication and protected weight bearing and detecting space-occupying lesions
in a fracture boot or short leg cast for responsible for tibial nerve compression
4 to 8 weeks. The treating clinician Presentation and Physical (Figure 4). Nerve conduction velocity
also should consider a metabolic Examination (NCV) studies and EMG can be per-
workup, including vitamin D levels and Identification of TTS can be chal- formed to confirm the diagnosis;
bone density testing, especially for the lenging. Patient complaints may be however, an overview of four pro-
patient with a previous history of frac- vague and difficult to localize. Never- spective level III studies indicates that
ture. Normal activities can be resumed theless, pain and paresthesia are clas- false-negative rates are high with these
after this period of immobilization, sically localized to the posteromedial modalities.61 Negative NCV findings
once tenderness resolves. The prog- ankle and heel, often radiating distally do not exclude the diagnosis. Sensi-
nosis is excellent, and surgery is rarely into the plantar foot. Symptoms are tivity of sensory NCV abnormalities
required. Significant displacement often exacerbated by stance and ranged from 90.5% to 96% (false-
and malalignment are uncommon, exercise. Dysesthesia can disrupt the negative rate [range], 4% to 9.5%),
and nonunion is rare. patient’s sleep. Severe compression and sensitivity of prolonged distal
may cause weakness; this finding is motor latency ranged from 21.5% to
among the latest, presenting first 52.4% (false-negative rate [range],
Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome in the toe abductors and subsequently 47.6% to 78.5%).
in the short toe flexors.60 Impaired The usefulness of NCV and EMG in
Anatomy and sensation along the tibial nerve dis- diagnosis and prediction of outcomes
Pathophysiology tribution associated with a Tinel sign in TTS remains questionable. These
Tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS) is an along the tarsal canal is considered techniques also vary greatly between
entrapment neuropathy of the tibial to be the most pathognomonic find- studies, and few high-quality reports
nerve as it courses through the tarsal ing.59 Other provocative maneuvers, either correlate NCV and EMG with
Copyright Ó the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Plantar and Medial Heel Pain: Diagnosis and Management
Figure 4
Axial proton density-weighted magnetic resonance images without (A) and with (B) fat saturation, and sagittal short tau
inversion recovery (C) sequence image, demonstrating a tarsal tunnel ganglion (*) compressing the medial (red arrow) and
lateral (blue arrow) plantar nerves. (Courtesy of Peter T. Evangelista, MD, Providence, RI.)
outcome or provide supportive evi- tunnel release involves careful division tes, decompression has been reported
dence for significant diagnostic util- of the flexor retinaculum overlying the to significantly improve one-point
ity. In an evidence-based review of the posterior tibial nerve as it courses pressure threshold as measured by
use of NCV and EMG in the diag- behind the medial malleolus as well as monofilament examination but not
nosis of TTS, sensory NCV was release of the fascia over the abductor two-point discrimination 8 to 9 months
determined more likely to be abnor- hallucis. Complete release minimizes postoperatively.66 Another report sug-
mal than motor NCV; however, the the chance of persistent or recurrent gests that in patients with diabetes,
actual sensitivity and specificity of symptoms. To this end, anatomic and a positive Tinel sign has a 90% positive
these tests could not be determined.61 clinical studies also suggest release of predictive value of symptom relief
the medial septum deep to the abductor following extended decompression.67
hallucis, under which the lateral and, In patients with TTS resulting from
Management sometimes, the medial plantar nerves a space-occupying ganglion in the
Nonsurgical options for TTS include pass.54,62 tarsal tunnel, excision of the ganglion
NSAIDs and immobilization. Pa- In a recent series, all patients demon- results in satisfactory outcomes.68
tients with pes planus deformity may strated improvement in mean sensory
benefit from custom orthoses.58,59 threshold as defined by monofilament
Local corticosteroid injection into examination 12 months after surgical Summary
the tarsal tunnel has been advocated decompression.63 Surgical interven-
by some authors, but its use should tion should be carefully considered, Pain of the plantar and medial heel is
be carefully considered because of however, because results can be a common complaint. A thorough
the potential for tendon rupture and unpredictable. For example, surgical history and physical examination is
intravascular injection.59 decompression successfully relieves paramount to establish an accurate
Surgery is reserved for patients who symptoms in only approximately diagnosis. In most patients, the diag-
do not respond to nonsurgical treat- 50% of patients for whom a definite nosis can be made clinically, taking
ment and who have no other reason- etiology cannot be identified.64 care to characterize the quality, loca-
able explanation for their symptoms as In one study, 56% of patients had tion, timing, and duration of pain. On
well as for those with identifiable space- fair or poor results at long-term occasion, advanced imaging or neuro-
occupying lesions. Traditional tarsal follow-up.65 In patients with diabe- diagnostic studies may be necessary
Copyright Ó the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Craig R. Lareau, MD, et al
when radiographs and clinical exami- 7. Riddle DL, Schappert SM: Volume of 22. Donley BG, Moore T, Sferra J, Gozdanovic J,
ambulatory care visits and patterns of care Smith R: The efficacy of oral nonsteroidal
nation are inconclusive. Initial man- for patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis: anti-inflammatory medication (NSAID) in
agement is typically nonsurgical. For A national study of medical doctors. Foot the treatment of plantar fasciitis: A
the small percentage of patients whose Ankle Int 2004;25(5):303-310. randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled
study. Foot Ankle Int 2007;28(1):20-23.
symptoms persist despite an adequate 8. Buchbinder R: Clinical practice: Plantar
fasciitis. N Engl J Med 2004;350(21): 23. Landorf KB, Keenan AM, Herbert RD:
course of nonsurgical management
2159-2166. Effectiveness of foot orthoses to treat
surgical intervention can be considered. plantar fasciitis: A randomized trial. Arch
9. Hicks JH: The mechanics of the foot: II. The Intern Med 2006;166(12):1305-1310.
plantar aponeurosis and the arch. J Anat
1954;88(1):25-30. 24. Rompe JD, Cacchio A, Weil L Jr, et al:
References Plantar fascia-specific stretching versus
10. Wright DG, Rennels DC: A study of the radial shock-wave therapy as initial
elastic properties of plantar fascia. J Bone treatment of plantar fasciopathy. J Bone
Evidence-based Medicine: Levels of Joint Surg Am 1964;46(3):482-492. Joint Surg Am 2010;92(15):2514-2522.
evidence are described in the table of
11. Lemont H, Ammirati KM, Usen N: Plantar 25. Walther M, Kratschmer B, Verschl J, et al:
contents. In this article, references 2, fasciitis: A degenerative process (fasciosis) Effect of different orthotic concepts as first
3, 5, 6, 20, 22-25, and 32-41 are without inflammation. J Am Podiatr Med line treatment of plantar fasciitis. Foot
Assoc 2003;93(3):234-237. Ankle Surg 2013;19(2):103-107.
level I studies. References 1, 13, 21,
42, and 66 are level II studies. Ref- 12. Thomas JL, Christensen JC, Kravitz SR, 26. Wolgin M, Cook C, Graham C,
et al: The diagnosis and treatment of heel Mauldin D: Conservative treatment of
erences 16 and 43 are level III stud- pain: A clinical practice guideline. Revision plantar heel pain: Long-term follow-up.
ies. References 14, 15, 17, 18, 26-30, 2010. J Foot Ankle Surg 2010;49(3 suppl): Foot Ankle Int 1994;15(3):97-102.
44-46, 49-54, 58, 62-65, 67, and 68 S1-S19.
27. Lin SC, Chen CP, Tang SF, Wong AM,
are level IV studies. References 4, 7- 13. Riddle DL, Pulisic M, Pidcoe P, Hsieh JH, Chen WP: Changes in windlass
Johnson RE: Risk factors for plantar effect in response to different shoe and
12, 19, 31, 47, 48, 55-57, and 59-61
fasciitis: A matched case-control study. J insole designs during walking. Gait Posture
are level V expert opinion. Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85(5):872-877. 2013;37(2):235-241.
References printed in bold type are 14. Maskill JD, Bohay DR, Anderson JG: 28. Acevedo JI, Beskin JL: Complications of
those published within the past 5 Gastrocnemius recession to treat isolated plantar fascia rupture associated with
foot pain. Foot Ankle Int 2010;31(1): corticosteroid injection. Foot Ankle Int
years. 19-23. 1998;19(2):91-97.
1. Brinks A, Koes BW, Volkers AC, 15. Patel A, DiGiovanni B: Association 29. Kim C, Cashdollar MR, Mendicino RW,
Verhaar JA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM: Adverse between plantar fasciitis and isolated Catanzariti AR, Fuge L: Incidence of
effects of extra-articular corticosteroid contracture of the gastrocnemius. Foot plantar fascia ruptures following
injections: A systematic review. BMC Ankle Int 2011;32(1):5-8. corticosteroid injection. Foot Ankle Spec
Musculoskelet Disord 2010;11:206. 2010;3(6):335-337.
16. DiGiovanni CW, Kuo R, Tejwani N, et al:
2. Crawford F, Atkins D, Young P, Edwards J: Isolated gastrocnemius tightness. J Bone 30. Sellman JR: Plantar fascia rupture
Steroid injection for heel pain: Evidence of Joint Surg Am 2002;84(6):962-970. associated with corticosteroid injection.
short-term effectiveness. A randomized Foot Ankle Int 1994;15(7):376-381.
controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 17. Prichasuk S: The heel pad in plantar heel
1999;38(10):974-977. pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994;76(1): 31. Cole BJ, Schumacher HR Jr: Injectable
140-142. corticosteroids in modern practice. J Am
3. Díaz-Llopis IV, Rodríguez-Ruíz CM, Acad Orthop Surg 2005;13(1):37-46.
Mulet-Perry S, Mondéjar-Gómez FJ, 18. Davies MS, Weiss GA, Saxby TS: Plantar
Climent-Barberá JM, Cholbi-Llobel F: fasciitis: How successful is surgical 32. Speed CA, Nichols D, Wies J, et al:
Randomized controlled study of the intervention? Foot Ankle Int 1999;20(12): Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar
efficacy of the injection of botulinum toxin 803-807. fasciitis: A double blind randomised controlled
type A versus corticosteroids in chronic trial. J Orthop Res 2003;21(5):937-940.
plantar fasciitis: Results at one and six 19. Narváez JA, Narváez J, Ortega R,
months. Clin Rehabil 2012;26(7):594-606. Aguilera C, Sánchez A, Andía E: Painful 33. Theodore GH, Buch M, Amendola A,
heel: MR imaging findings. Radiographics Bachmann C, Fleming LL, Zingas C:
4. Johnson JE, Klein SE, Putnam RM: 2000;20(2):333-352. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the
Corticosteroid injections in the treatment of treatment of plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle
foot & ankle disorders: An AOFAS survey. 20. DiGiovanni BF, Nawoczenski DA, Int 2004;25(5):290-297.
Foot Ankle Int 2011;32(4):394-399. Lintal ME, et al: Tissue-specific plantar
34. Kudo P, Dainty K, Clarfield M, Coughlin L,
fascia-stretching exercise enhances
5. Lee TG, Ahmad TS: Intralesional Lavoie P, Lebrun C: Randomized, placebo-
outcomes in patients with chronic heel pain:
autologous blood injection compared to controlled, double-blind clinical trial
A prospective, randomized study. J Bone
corticosteroid injection for treatment of evaluating the treatment of plantar fasciitis
Joint Surg Am 2003;85(7):1270-1277.
chronic plantar fasciitis: A prospective, with an extracoporeal shockwave therapy
randomized, controlled trial. Foot Ankle 21. Digiovanni BF, Nawoczenski DA, (ESWT) device: A North American
Int 2007;28(9):984-990. Malay DP, et al: Plantar fascia-specific confirmatory study. J Orthop Res 2006;24
stretching exercise improves outcomes in (2):115-123.
6. McMillan AM, Landorf KB, Gilheany MF,
patients with chronic plantar fasciitis: A
Bird AR, Morrow AD, Menz HB: 35. Gerdesmeyer L, Frey C, Vester J, et al:
prospective clinical trial with two-year
Ultrasound guided corticosteroid injection Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy
follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88
for plantar fasciitis: Randomised controlled is safe and effective in the treatment of
(8):1775-1781.
trial. BMJ 2012;344:e3260. chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis: Results
Copyright Ó the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Plantar and Medial Heel Pain: Diagnosis and Management
of a confirmatory randomized placebo- 45. Abbassian A, Kohls-Gatzoulis J, Solan MC: 57. Spitz DJ, Newberg AH: Imaging of stress
controlled multicenter study. Am J Sports Proximal medial gastrocnemius release in fractures in the athlete. Radiol Clin North
Med 2008;36(11):2100-2109. the treatment of recalcitrant plantar Am 2002;40(2):313-331.
fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int 2012;33(1):14-19.
36. Malay DS, Pressman MM, Assili A, et al: 58. Daniels TR, Lau JT, Hearn TC: The
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus 46. Hsu CC, Tsai WC, Wang CL, Pao SH, effects of foot position and load on tibial
placebo for the treatment of chronic Shau YW, Chuan YS: Microchambers and nerve tension. Foot Ankle Int 1998;19(2):
proximal plantar fasciitis: Results of macrochambers in heel pads: Are they 73-78.
a randomized, placebo-controlled, double- functionally different? J Appl Physiol
blinded, multicenter intervention trial. J (1985) 2007;102(6):2227-2231. 59. Lau JT, Daniels TR: Tarsal tunnel
Foot Ankle Surg 2006;45(4):196-210. syndrome: A review of the literature. Foot
47. Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, Saltzman CL, eds: Ankle Int 1999;20(3):201-209.
37. Gollwitzer H, Diehl P, von Korff A, Surgery of the Foot and Ankle, ed 8.
Rahlfs VW, Gerdesmeyer L: Extracorporeal Philadelphia, PA, Mosby, 2007. 60. Ahmad M, Tsang K, Mackenney PJ,
shock wave therapy for chronic painful heel Adedapo AO: Tarsal tunnel syndrome: A
syndrome: A prospective, double blind, 48. Rondhuis JJ, Huson A: The first branch of literature review. Foot Ankle Surg 2012;18
randomized trial assessing the efficacy of the lateral plantar nerve and heel pain. Acta (3):149-152.
a new electromagnetic shock wave device. J Morphol Neerl Scand 1986;24(4):269-279.
Foot Ankle Surg 2007;46(5):348-357. 61. Patel AT, Gaines K, Malamut R, et al:
49. Recht MP, Grooff P, Ilaslan H, Recht HS, Usefulness of electrodiagnostic techniques
38. Buchbinder R, Ptasznik R, Gordon J, Sferra J, Donley BG: Selective atrophy of in the evaluation of suspected tarsal tunnel
Buchanan J, Prabaharan V, Forbes A: the abductor digiti quinti: An MRI study. syndrome: An evidence-based review.
Ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shock AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(3):W123- Muscle Nerve 2005;32(2):236-240.
wave therapy for plantar fasciitis: A W127.
randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 62. Mullick T, Dellon AL: Results of
288(11):1364-1372. 50. Schon LC, Glennon TP, Baxter DE: Heel decompression of four medial ankle tunnels
pain syndrome: Electrodiagnostic support in the treatment of tarsal tunnels syndrome.
39. Haake M, Buch M, Schoellner C, et al: for nerve entrapment. Foot Ankle 1993;14 J Reconstr Microsurg 2008;24(2):119-126.
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for (3):129-135.
plantar fasciitis: Randomised controlled 63. Gondring WH, Shields B: A touch pressure
multicentre trial. BMJ 2003;327(7406):75. 51. Chundru U, Liebeskind A, Seidelmann F, sensory assessment of the surgical treatment
Fogel J, Franklin P, Beltran J: Plantar of the tarsal tunnel syndrome. Foot Ankle
40. Brook J, Dauphinee DM, Korpinen J, fasciitis and calcaneal spur formation are Surg 2011;17(4):266-269.
Rawe IM: Pulsed radiofrequency associated with abductor digiti minimi
electromagnetic field therapy: A potential atrophy on MRI of the foot. Skeletal Radiol 64. Gondring WH, Shields B, Wenger S: An
novel treatment of plantar fasciitis. J Foot 2008;37(6):505-510. outcomes analysis of surgical treatment of
Ankle Surg 2012;51(3):312-316. tarsal tunnel syndrome. Foot Ankle Int
52. Baxter DE, Pfeffer GB: Treatment of 2003;24(7):545-550.
41. Peterlein CD, Funk JF, Hölscher A,
chronic heel pain by surgical release of the
Schuh A, Placzek R: Is botulinum toxin A 65. Pfeiffer WH, Cracchiolo A III: Clinical
first branch of the lateral plantar nerve. Clin
effective for the treatment of plantar results after tarsal tunnel decompression. J
Orthop Relat Res 1992;(279):229-236.
fasciitis? Clin J Pain 2012;28(6):527-533. Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76(8):
53. Barker AR, Rosson GD, Dellon AL: 1222-1230.
42. Akşahin E, Dogruyol D, Yüksel HY, et al:
Pressure changes in the medial and lateral
The comparison of the effect of 66. Gondring WH, Tarun PK, Trepman E:
plantar and tarsal tunnels related to ankle
corticosteroids and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) Touch pressure and sensory density after
position: A cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int
for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Arch tarsal tunnel release in diabetic neuropathy.
2007;28(2):250-254.
Orthop Trauma Surg 2012;132(6):781-785. Foot Ankle Surg 2012;18(4):241-246.
43. Tomczak RL, Haverstock BD: A 54. Singh G, Kumar VP: Neuroanatomical
basis for the tarsal tunnel syndrome. Foot 67. Dellon AL, Muse VL, Scott ND, et al: A
retrospective comparison of endoscopic
Ankle Int 2012;33(6):513-518. positive Tinel sign as predictor of pain relief
plantar fasciotomy to open plantar
or sensory recovery after decompression of
fasciotomy with heel spur resection for
55. Anderson EG: Fatigue fractures of the foot. chronic tibial nerve compression in patients
chronic plantar fasciitis/heel spur syndrome.
Injury 1990;21(5):275-279. with diabetic neuropathy. J Reconstr
J Foot Ankle Surg 1995;34(3):305-311.
Microsurg 2012;28(4):235-240.
56. Fredericson M, Jennings F, Beaulieu C,
44. Bader L, Park K, Gu Y, O’Malley MJ:
Matheson GO: Stress fractures in athletes. 68. Nagaoka M, Satou K: Tarsal tunnel
Functional outcome of endoscopic plantar
Top Magn Reson Imaging 2006;17(5): syndrome caused by ganglia. J Bone Joint
fasciotomy. Foot Ankle Int 2012;33(1):
309-325. Surg Br 1999;81(4):607-610.
37-43.
Copyright Ó the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.