52146d634 PDF
52146d634 PDF
The horrific accounts that span the globe on the scope and brutality of sexual violence during
conflict and in the wake of natural disasters have not only generated unprecedented international
media attention but have triggered the United Nations Security Council to adopt Security Council
Resolution 1888 on Sexual Violence in Conflict, which underscores accountability and more
comprehensive and coordinated action.
Yet, incidents of sexual violence and other forms of gender-based violence are being perpetrated
with impunity and prevention of violence and support for survivors is insufficient. In our rush
to deliver emergency food, water, and shelter and to address health needs, we often neglect the
hidden devastation experienced by untold numbers of women and girls. In the face of so much
need, we may fail to recognize the urgency of addressing sexual violence; and our decision is
sometimes echoed by the survivors themselves. As a woman who was raped during Kenya’s 2008
post-election violence explained: “in a crisis like this, your first thought is to care for your children, get
settled down, you don’t even think to report…you are trying to figure out how to live.” As a community,
we must prioritize action that could end this injustice and ensure that humanitarian services are
provided in a manner that protects women and children from gender-based violence.
If the issue of gender-based violence in conflict and natural disasters is not directly, immediately
and aggressively confronted, the cumulative consequences can negate our most essential
humanitarian goals and stall global progress made on the issue. The risk of further entrenching a
culture of tolerance for this staggering violation of human rights requires us to exhort practitioners,
policy makers and humanitarian and political leaders to stamp out gender-based violence in all
its manifestations.
This coordination handbook represents a key tool for all sectors of the humanitarian community
to work together in the prevention of and response to gender-based violence. Drawing from
and building upon a growing body of international tools and resources, it provides the most
comprehensive guidelines to date on how to establish coordination mechanisms to address gender-
based violence in emergencies. Its purpose is to facilitate concrete action—from the earliest stages
of humanitarian intervention—to safeguard survivors and protect those at risk, and to accelerate
efforts aimed at ending gender-based violence.
All those working in humanitarian settings have a responsibility to familiarize themselves with
this handbook as an essential tool in meeting our responsibility to protect the communities we
serve and provide services to meet the myriad needs of gender-based violence survivors.
The handbook was developed by Jeanne Ward, with assistance from Julie Lafreniere on select
content and Jeanine Bashir Kanyana on the preliminary formatting. Alex Krueger and Tirana
Hassan of Child Frontiers generously shared materials developed on behalf of the Child Protection
Working Group for the IASC Child Protection Coordinators’ Handbook 2009 for Clusters, which have
been adapted for use in this handbook. Lisa Ernst was responsible for editing this handbook, and
Lenny Tin produced the final design.
UNICEF, UNFPA, IRC and IMC would like to especially acknowledge members of the GBV AoR
and many other GBV field experts who provided guidance and feedback and who will continue to
provide inputs to this provisional edition.
The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the
expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations or partners concerning the
legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation
of its frontiers or boundaries.
The GBV AoR welcomes requests for permission to reproduce and/or translate this handbook in
part or in full. This provisional edition will be field-tested in various humanitarian settings across
the world, after which it will be finalized to reflect lessons learned and further contributions from
colleagues. A form to provide feedback on this handbook is included at the back, and is also
accessible at http://gbv.oneresponse.info. Additional comments, enquiries and any adaptations
or translations of these materials should be forwarded to [email protected].
This handbook is available in a word document (accessible online and on CD) in order to allow
readers to easily extract and share select sections and/or adjust the content of the annexes according
to the needs of the setting. Both PDF and word versions of the handbook may be consulted and
downloaded at http://gbv.oneresponse.info.
Foreword (i)
Acknowledgements (ii)
List of acronyms (iii)
Section one: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION 7
Introduction 9
1.1. Understanding GBV 10
1.2. Basic models for GBV programming 13
1.3. Guiding principles of GBV programming 19
1.4. The international legal framework 22
1.5. Protection from sexual exploitation and abuse 24
Introduction:
ABOUT this GBV coordination
HANDBOOK
1
Introduction: ABOUT
this GBV coordination HANDBOOK
Why was this handbook developed? “Women and children
are disproportionately
In 2008, largely as an outcome of the humanitarian reform process targets” and constitute
described in greater detail in Section two of this handbook, the GBV the “majority of all
Area of Responsibility Working Group (GBV AoR) was established victims” of contemporary
under the Protection Cluster at the global level to promote a coherent, armed conflicts. -Report
comprehensive and coordinated approach to GBV in emergencies. of the Secretary- General on
An initial study undertaken in 2008 by the GBV AoR documenting Women, Peace and Security
GBV coordination structures in humanitarian settings around the (2002)
world found that field guidance on establishing and leading a GBV
coordinating body was a priority. The GBV AoR subsequently commissioned the development
of this handbook.
Introduction
Who should use this handbook?
Good to know This handbook is targeted to all those individuals and agencies
involved in GBV coordination activities in humanitarian emergencies,
For the purposes of this from the community level to the national and international levels.
handbook, the terms While it may be particularly relevant to GBV Coordinators, it
emergency and crisis are
can—and should—be used by any individuals and agencies that
used interchangeably and
apply to armed conflict as are partnering in efforts to develop comprehensive, effective and
well as natural disasters. ethical GBV programming. The handbook can also be used by GBV
advocates as a tool to educate UN personnel, government officials
and those working for international and local NGOs who may have no prior experience or knowledge
of GBV programming and/or their basic protection responsibilities related to GBV coordination and GBV
prevention and response. In addition, it can be used by multi-sectoral actors in settings where there
are cyclical crises as part of risk reduction and emergency-preparedness planning.
CRISIS
Pre-crisis
Crisis Stabilization
Return/Recovery
(Post-crisis)
Time
This handbook focuses primarily on the work that should be done to scale up coordination from
the onset of an emergency (Phase 2), but it should also be used as a guide to indicate what sort of
contingency planning should be in place pre-crisis, as well as to highlight what kinds of activities
Introduction
Good to know
Many settings, especially those affected by recurring disasters such as floods and droughts or by re-
emergent conflicts, often have a contingency plan in place. GBV prevention and response should be
integrated into this plan. One important component of the work of a GBV coordination mechanism
focusing on emergency response is to utilize existing knowledge of vulnerability factors to assist
government actors, gender theme groups and other relevant partners in risk reduction and preparedness
planning for future emergencies. (See IS 1.2 for resources on gender and disasters.)
As represented in the diagram below, this handbook is organized in colour-coded sections, each of
which is comprised of brief ‘information sheets’ that address a particular issue or topic relevant to
that section. The information sheets are short summaries meant to provide the minimum amount
of information necessary. Wherever possible, the information sheets are supplemented with
annexes of practical tools and templates (which can be adapted to different field contexts) as well
as references to resources that are available online, with a link to the URL, where you can find
more in-depth information about a particular coordination issue or related resource. Many of
the information sheets have text boxes that identify Good practices, Lessons learned, and points
that are Critical to know and Good to know for anyone developing a coordination mechanism
in an emergency setting. Because content in the information sheets sometimes overlaps, readers
are also directed to other information sheets—identified through colour-coded highlighting—for
further information.
1
Visual from CARE, “Building Partnerships for Health in Conflict-Affected Settings”, May 2007, pp 9-10.
Section 6 Section 1
GBV
Section 5 Coordination Section 2
Handbook
Section 4 Section 3
Introduction
Section one of this handbook provides a review of the BASICS of GBV in humanitarian cri-
ses so that anyone reading this handbook has an understanding of the key definitions, principles
and programming models that underpin all other sections of the handbook.
Section two describes the WHO of coordination, providing an overview of the cluster
approach and a description of GBV coordination responsibilities within that approach at the global
level and at the field level, as well as a brief introduction to other coordination mechanisms that
may exist in settings where clusters have not been implemented.
Section three describes the WHAT of coordination, identifying some of the key responsibilities,
or FUNCTIONS, of any coordination mechanism.
Section four illustrates the WHEN and HOW of coordination by reviewing the key steps to
be undertaken when IMPLEMENTING and maintaining a coordination mechanism.
Section five provides some PRACTICAL coordination skills for GBV Coordinators and other
coordination partners.
Section six provides all of the ANNEXES that are linked to all other sections of the handbook.
Critical to know
Anyone engaged in coordinating GBV programming in emergencies should be familiar with the
following websites:
Gender-based Violence Network: Essential Tools for GBV Prevention and Response in Emergencies
(Links to essential guides, tools and other technical resources for prevention and response to
gender-based violence in humanitarian settings):
http://www.gbvnetwork.org/
Sexual Violence Research Initiative (Online bibliography containing links to documents relating to sexual
violence in crises):
http://www.svri.org/emergencies.htm
Section 1:
1
Introduction
GBV BASICS and how they relate to
GBV COORDINATION
7
Section One: GBV BASICS
and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION
Introduction
It is easy to take for granted that everyone working in GBV has the same core understanding
of definitions, principles and programming models related to GBV. However, partners often
discover well into a coordination process that there are widely divergent views on even the most
fundamental theoretical and practical GBV issues. In such cases, misunderstandings are likely
to emerge over time, leading to compromised coordination efforts, but also—and even more
critically—to unsafe or unethical programming.
This handbook does not provide an extensive overview of the basics of GBV—most of that
information should be accessed through the resources listed in the Introduction. This section
on GBV basics, however, does highlight key information that should be emphasized to all
partners from the outset of any coordination efforts and provides recommendations of other
resources that will allow for greater exploration of key points.
The section begins with an information sheet that provides a brief overview of GBV—particularly
the implications of the terminology itself and the importance of all GBV partners having an
understanding of the nature and scope of GBV in emergencies in order to be effective programmers
1
and advocates. The second information sheet covers basic models for GBV programming—
highlighting in particular the ‘multi-sectoral’ and ‘multi-level’ models and emphasizing the
importance of being familiar with other models and tools relevant to addressing GBV, such
Introduction
as gender equality programming models, disaster risk reduction, the Minimum Initial Service
Package (MISP), etc.
The third information sheet reviews the guiding principles of GBV programming through three
linked approaches: the human rights-based approach, the survivor-centred approach and the
community-based approach. The fourth information sheet provides a summary of the legal
framework that is the foundation of rights-based work on GBV, pointing out how critical it is for
GBV actors to know and utilize the human rights history that has so clearly established a mandate
for humanitarian actors to address GBV in emergencies.
The final information sheet provides a basic background on protection from sexual exploitation
and abuse (PSEA), emphasizing that while the GBV coordination mechanism may fill immediate
gaps in PSEA activities, other structures—such as an in-country PSEA focal point network
developed under the Humanitarian Coordinator/Resident Coordinator (HC/RC)—are ultimately
responsible for this area of action. The GBV coordination mechanism should work with the in-
country PSEA focal point network on common objectives related to addressing PSEA.
Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION 9
Section One: GBV BASICS
and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION
1. Understanding GBV
around the world, GBV has a greater impact on women and girls than on men and boys. The
IS 1.1
term “gender-based violence” is often used interchangeably with the term “violence against
women.” The term highlights the gender dimension of these types of acts; in other words,
the relationship between females’ subordinate status in society and their increased
vulnerability to violence. (p. 7)
Understanding GBV
Types of GBV can vary across cultures, countries and regions, but some of the more common
forms include: sexual violence, sexual exploitation and/or abuse (SEA), domestic violence,
trafficking, forced and/or early marriage and other traditional practices that cause harm, such as
female genital mutilation, honour killings, widow inheritance, etc.1
Often there is resistance to the fact that most GBV impacts women and girls and that GBV
programming therefore focuses on women and girls. It may be useful to discuss with partners that
the term ‘GBV’ came into international discourse as a way of emphasizing the structural nature
1
The IASC definition of gender-based violence draws from the official definition of violence against women, Article One
of the UN Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women (DEVAW, 1993).
10 Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION
of violence against women and girls and the fact that it constitutes a human rights violation. By
articulating violence against women as a violation of rights, activists found a platform for holding
states accountable for addressing it. In humanitarian settings, there are also obligations on the
international community for addressing GBV (see IS 1.4).
Addressing violence against men and boys is important, but the causes, contributing factors
and outcomes of that violence are different than violence against women and girls. Therefore, a
decision should be taken as to whether male survivors should be included as target ‘beneficiaries’
of GBV coordination and programming efforts. (Where GBV programming efforts target women
and girls, every effort should be made on a case-by-case basis to ensure that men and boys seeking
help for exposure to sexual and other forms of violence receive the assistance and referrals they
need.)
IS 1.1
have a different understanding of how sexual
partners should make every effort to include violence is defined, for example, it may cause
men and boys in addressing violence challenges in communication as well as in data
against women and girls, and coordination collection and analysis. To address this issue, the
efforts should also engage any actors GBV Information Management Systems Project
Understanding GBV
working on broader gender issues, such as has developed an incident classification system,
gender theme groups, GenCap Advisors (see which can help GBV coordination partners to
Annex 1 for more information about GenCap) define and document different types of GBV. The
and/or gender focal points of UN agencies, GBV information management system (GBVIMS) is
government entities and international and described further in IS 3.9.
local NGOs.
Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION 11
It is critical that those working on GBV understand the spectrum of ill effects—at the individual,
family, community and societal levels—in order to target services effectively as well as to advocate
for protection measures. Services should not only work to reduce negative consequences, but also
prevent further harm.
Any actors engaged in GBV coordination have a responsibility as experts and advocates to
be familiar with the global data on sexual
violence and other forms of GBV in
Good practice
emergencies in order to 1) understand and During the post-election violence in Kenya (2008),
anticipate the risks for and effects of GBV in the GBV Sub-Cluster developed an information
the populations with whom they are working sheet for UN, government and I/NGO actors to
and 2) educate the humanitarian community educate them about GBV basics. Developing the
information sheet enabled sub-cluster members
about their responsibility to address GBV.
to discuss and agree on key concepts and to share
Being able to clearly articulate the argument information with partners outside the sub-cluster in
for GBV prevention and response is important a standardized way.
to all aspects of GBV coordination.
Resources
The following resources provide useful overviews of the scope of violence against women in
conflict and development settings.
http://www.unifem.org/materials/item_detail.php?ProductID=17
OCHA/IRIN, Broken Bodies, Broken Dreams: Violence Against Women Exposed (2005). See Chapter 13
on sexual violence in conflict.
http://www.irinnews.org/IndepthMain.aspx?IndepthId=59&ReportId=72831
Center for Health and Gender Equality, and Population Information Program,
Understanding GBV
Annex
12 Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION
Section One: GBV BASICS
and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION
2. Basic models for GBV programming
The primary goal of GBV coordination is to ensure that accessible and safe services are available to
survivors and that prevention mechanisms are put in place to reduce incidents of GBV—particularly
sexual violence during the early stages of an emergency. For any GBV coordination mechanism
to be effective, GBV partners must know and be able to apply basic models of programming.
Understanding these models will help GBV partners to identify priorities and design action plans
that are based on good practice.
The IASC GBV Guidelines should underpin any work that is conducted on GBV in emergencies
(see text box, below). GBV Coordinators and partners should also understand the two basic
programming models described below (the ‘multi-sectoral’ model and the ‘multi-level’ model),
which are among those most widely used in emergency and post-emergency contexts. While these
IS 1.2
models are inter-related, each has a particular emphasis that is important when planning and
implementing programming from the earliest stages of an emergency through to recovery and
rehabilitation.1
Critical to know
1
For an example of both models being integrated into one comprehensive framework, see the GBV Strategic Framework
for Prevention of and Response to GBV in East, Central and Southern Africa (USAID, UNICEF, UNFPA, and UNIFEM,
2007), available at http://eastafrica.usaid.gov/proxy/Document.1138.aspx
Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION 13
from the various sectors. The multi-sectoral model also explicitly highlights responsibilities unique
to each sector:
►► The health sector should screen clients for gender-based violence; ensure same-sex
interviewers for individuals who have been exposed to gender-based violence; respond to
the immediate health and psychological needs of the woman or girl who has been exposed;
institute protocols for treatment, referral and documentation that guarantee confidentiality;
provide GBV-related services free of charge; and be prepared to provide forensic evidence
and testimony in court when authorized to do so by the survivor.
►► The legal/justice sector should be able to provide free or low-cost legal counselling,
IS 1.2
representation and other court support to women and girls who have been exposed to
gender-based violence; review and revise laws that reinforce gender-based violence; and
monitor court cases and judicial processes.
►► Within the security sector, police, military and peacekeeping personnel should be
Basic models for GBV programming
A key principle underlying the multi-sectoral approach is that the rights and needs of survivors
are pre-eminent, in terms of access to respectful and supportive services, guarantees of
confidentiality and safety and the ability to determine the course of action for addressing the GBV
incident. Another essential element of the multi-sectoral approach is close cooperation with local
women’s groups and, if relevant, representatives from the ministry responsible for women’s and
girls’ affairs. Women and girls must be included from the beginning of programme design and
maintain an active role throughout programme monitoring, evaluation and ongoing programme
development.
One of the limitations of the multi-sectoral model as it exists to date is that it specifies many of the
sectoral responsibilities in terms of response but gives limited attention to prevention. Where it does
identify prevention activities, it fails to prioritize them or even provide a conceptual framework
for prioritizing them. As such, a supplemental model to the multi-sectoral model—the multi-level
model—is currently evolving. This model was first formally outlined in the International Rescue
Committee’s GBV Program Strategy (2004).2
2
The multi-level model is detailed further in a recent paper produced by the author of the IRC Strategy: Read-Hamilton,
S., “Services, Systems, Structures: A Multi-level Approach for Addressing Gender-based Violence in Conflict-affected
Settings” (publication pending). For copies of this article, contact: [email protected]
14 Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION
For effective short- and long-term GBV prevention, interventions must take place across all
the key sectors and at three levels, so that structural, systemic and individual protections are
institutionalized. These levels are as follows:
IS 1.2
3. Tertiary prevention/operational response, which includes response at the individual level
through direct services to meet the needs of women and girls who have been subjected to GBV.
Examples include:
Many GBV programmes concentrate their efforts at the tertiary, or operational response, level.
However, the most they can hope to achieve at this level is to mitigate the intensity of the problem
for individuals who have suffered violence. By planning activities that focus on the secondary and
primary levels of prevention as well, programmers and policy-makers across all sectors can begin
to institute lasting reforms that not only protect those who have been exposed to gender-based
violence, but also work towards the elimination of GBV.
It is important to remember that the models summarized above are a useful starting point, but they are
certainly not exhaustive. GBV actors should also familiarize themselves with gender-equality
programming as a key method for preventing GBV (see below) as well participatory and
community-based models that apply a human rights-based approach to working with an affected
population (see IS 1.3). Those working in settings with peacekeeping missions should understand
the strategic frameworks that have been developed to coordinate efforts of peacekeepers and
other humanitarian actors to combat sexual violence (see IS 2.B.1-2), and those working in settings
affected by natural disasters should familiarize themselves with the emerging tools focusing on
gender approaches to disaster risk reduction and emergency preparedness and response. It is also
important for GBV programmers to understand the components of the Minimum Initial Service
Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION 15
Package (MISP) for reproductive health interventions in an emergency, which include addressing
sexual violence. More information about the MISP is available at
www.misp.rhrc.org.
In addition to these basic models for GBV programming, partners should be familiar with the
goals and methods of gender-equality programming. Gender-equality programming is critical to
any long-term efforts to address GBV and should be initiated from the start of any humanitarian
intervention. However, it is important for GBV partners to understand that gender and GBV
programming are complementary—they are not interchangeable.
work can enhance GBV prevention gender-related initiatives that may require surge capacity,
and response efforts. To whatever such as GBV coordination and implementation of the UN
extent possible, GBV actors should Security Council Resolutions 1325/1820/ 1888/1889. For more
therefore collaborate with gender information about GenCap and to access the IASC Gender
experts on the ground to ensure Handbook and related training tools, see:
http://oneresponse.info/crosscutting/GenCap/Pages/
that gender and GBV programming
GenCap.aspx
efforts are mutually reinforcing.
Do these models also apply to settings where the emergency is the result of
a natural disaster?
These models are just as applicable for natural disasters, but in these settings—particularly when
the disasters tend to be recurrent, as in the case of floods or drought—it is important to use
these models to inform national and UN contingency planning as well as emergency response.
Contingency planning should include efforts aimed at disaster risk reduction—that is, working with
communities to understand what their specific vulnerabilities might be in the event that a disaster
occurs, and developing programming to mitigate those vulnerabilities before the disaster strikes.
To this end, GBV partners should work together with the government (where feasible), with
international actors and with vulnerable communities during the emergency-preparedness phase
in an effort to prevent sexual and other forms of violence prior to and during the emergency, as
well as build programmes across all key sectors to ensure rapid response when incidents do occur.
To the greatest extent possible, risk reduction and emergency preparedness should also, of course,
happen when the emergency is related to armed conflict. The IASC GBV Guidelines provide a
useful summary of key activities to be undertaken in the preparedness phase.
16 Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION
Resources
The resources below have been organized according to the key areas related to GBV prevention
and response and should be required reading for all GBV coordinators and programmers. They
represent only a fraction of materials and tools available. For more resources, visit the websites
identified in the Introduction to this handbook.
General
RHRC/JSI Research and Training Institute, Training Manual Facilitator’s Guide: Multisectoral &
Interagency Prevention and Response to Gender-based Violence in Populations Affected by Armed
Conflict (2004).
http://www.rhrc.org/resources/gbv/gbv_manual/intro.pdf
Women’s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, “Displaced Women and Girls at Risk:
Risk Factors, Protection Solutions and Resource Tools” (2006).
http://www.womensrefugeecommission.org/images/stories/WomRisk.pdf
Bott, S., Morrison A. and Ellsberg, M., “Preventing and Responding to Gender-
Based Violence in Middle- and Low-Income Countries: a Global Review and Analysis”
(World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3618, 2005).
http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&theSitePK=4693
72&piPK=64165421&menuPK=64166093&entityID=000112742_20050628084339
UNHCR, Handbook for the Protection of Women and Girls (2008).
http://www.unhcr.org/protect/PROTECTION/47cfae612.html
IS 1.2
Global Protection Cluster Working Group, Handbook for the Protection of Internally Displaced Persons
(2010).
http://oneresponse.info/GlobalClusters/Protection
ICRC, Addressing the Needs of Women Affected by Armed Conflict: An ICRC Guidance Document
(2004).
Health
Women’s Refugee Commission, “Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) Fact Sheet” (2003).
http://www.misp.rhrc.org
UNICEF, Caring for Survivors Training Manual (2010).
http://gbv.oneresponse.info
WHO/UNHCR, Clinical Management of Rape Survivors: Developing Protocols for Use with Refugees
and Internally Displaced Persons (2004).
http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/emergencies/924159263X/en/
index.html
IRC, Clinical Care for Sexual Assault Survivors (2009). http://clinicalcare.rhrc.org/
IASC, Guidelines for HIV/AIDS Interventions in Emergency Settings (2005).
http://www.who.int/3by5/publications/documents/iasc/en/index.html
Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION 17
Psychosocial
IASC, Guidelines on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings (2007).
http://www.who.int/hac/network/interagency/news/mental_health_guidelines/en/
The Psychosocial Working Group, “Psychosocial Intervention in Complex Emergencies: A
Conceptual Framework” (2003).
http://www.forcedmigration.org/psychosocial/papers/Conceptual%20Framework.pdf
WHO, Mental Health in Emergencies: Mental and Social Aspects of Health of Populations Exposed to
Extreme Stressors (2003).
http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/640.pdf
“Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) in Humanitarian Emergencies: What Should
Protection Coordinators Know?” (IASC Reference Group on MHPSS, 2009).
http://oneresponse.info/crosscutting/Mental%20Health/Pages/MentalHealth.aspx
“Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) in Humanitarian Emergencies: What Should
Health Coordinators Know?” (IASC Reference Group on MHPSS, 2009).
www.who.int/.../mental_health/emergencies/what_humanitarian_health_actors_
should_know.pdf
Security/Legal Justice
Bastik, M., Gramm K. and Kunz R., “Sexual Violence in Armed conflict: Global Overview and
Implications for the Security Sector” (DCAF, 2007).
http://www.dcaf.ch/publications/kms/details.cfm?lng=en&id=43991&nav1=4
IS 1.2
http://www.dcaf.ch/gssrtraining
Gender
IASC, Gender Handbook in Humanitarian Action. Women, Girls, Boys and Men - Different Needs, Equal
Opportunities (2006).
http://oneresponse.info/crosscutting/gender/Pages/Gender.aspx
Gender Equality and GBV Programming in Humanitarian Action - Training Toolkit (2009). (This
toolkit provides all the materials necessary to conduct an introductory training on the
IASC Gender Handbook and the IASC GBV Guidelines.)
http://oneresponse.info/crosscutting/gender/Pages/Gender.aspx
ISDR, UNDP, and IUCN, Making Disaster Risk Reduction Gender-Sensitive: Policy and Practical
Guidelines (2009).
http://www.preventionweb.net/files/9922_MakingDisasterRiskReductionGenderSe.pdf
Enarson, E. “SWS Fact Sheet: Women and Disaster” (June 2006).
http://www.socwomen.org/socactivism/factdisaster.pdf
Oxfam, Gender-sensitive Disaster Management: A Toolkit for Practitioners (2008).
http://www.preventionweb.net/english/professional/publications/v.php?id=7792
Annex
18 Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION
Section One: GBV BASICS
and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION
3. Guiding principles of GBV programming
The core guiding principles of safety, respect, confidentiality and non-discrimination apply to
both GBV programming and coordination efforts and must be considered in all decisions that
we make. These guiding principles are inextricably linked to the overarching humanitarian
responsibility to provide protection and assistance to those affected by a crisis (see IS 1.4) and are
embodied in three essential and interlinked approaches: the human rights-based approach, the
survivor-centred approach and the community-based approach.
A human rights-based approach seeks to analyze the root causes of problems and to redress discriminatory
practices that impede humanitarian intervention. The human rights-based approach:
IS 1.3
and principles into plans, policies and of prevailing political, legal, social and
processes of humanitarian intervention cultural norms and values.
and development. ►► Must be aimed at empowering survivors
►► Is multi-sectoral and comprehensive. and their communities.
A human rights-based approach certainly seeks to attend to the needs of those affected by an
emergency, but how those needs are determined and addressed is informed by legal and
moral obligations and accountability. Humanitarian actors, along with states (where they are
functioning), are ‘duty-bearers’ and bound by their obligations to encourage, empower and assist
‘rights-holders’ to claim their rights. A human rights-based approach requires all those who
develop and coordinate GBV programming to:
►► Assess the capacity of rights holders to claim their rights and identify the immediate,
underlying and structural causes for non-realization of rights.
►► Assess the capacities and limitations of duty-bearers to fulfil their obligations.
►► Develop strategies to build capacities and overcome limitations of duty-bearers.
►► Monitor and evaluate both outcomes and processes guided by human rights standards
and principles.
►► Ensure programming is informed by the recommendations of international human rights
bodies and mechanisms.
A survivor-centred approach means that all parties engaged in GBV programming prioritize the rights,
needs and wishes of survivors.
Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION 19
Essentially, a survivor-centred approach involves designing and developing programming that
ensures survivors’ rights and needs are first and foremost. The illustration below compares
survivors’ rights (left column) with negative impacts typically experienced by survivors of GBV:
To non-discrimination
VS Shame and stigma
The survivor-centred approach is based on a set of principles and skills designed to guide
professionals—regardless of their role—in their engagement with persons who have experienced
sexual violence or other forms of GBV. The survivor-centred approach aims to create a supportive
environment in which a survivor’s rights are respected and in which s/he is treated with dignity
and respect. The approach helps to promote a survivor’s recovery and his/her ability to identify
IS 1.3
and express needs and wishes, as well as to reinforce his/her capacity to make decisions about
possible interventions.1
All strategies for implementing GBV coordination mechanisms and GBV programming must
therefore abide by the principles of participation within a community-based approach, so
that women, men, girls and boys affected by an emergency are empowered to be active and
equal partners in GBV policy and strategy development, as well as in programme design and
implementation efforts. However, because GBV can be a socially and/or politically charged issue
in some communities, community-based participatory methods should begin with those who are
most affected by or vulnerable to GBV and, according to their insights and recommendations, seek
to involve others, such as male community leaders.
1
UNICEF, Caring for Survivors Training Manual (2010). Available at http://gbv.oneresponse.info
2
Note that this handbook uses the term ‘people of concern’ when referring generally to those who are affected by an
emergency.
3
UNHCR, A Community-based Approach in UNHCR’s Operations (January 2008), pp. 5-6.
20 Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION
What do these approaches have to do with GBV coordination?
These approaches should inform all aspects of GBV coordination and programme planning and
implementation. All activities of the GBV coordination body should express these principles, e.g.,
by ensuring that people of concern participate in coordination efforts; that coordination meetings
respect the principles of confidentiality; and that training tools and guidelines promote the rights
of all women and girls to be free from GBV and reinforce the fact that GBV is a crime that is never
the fault of the survivor or the result of the survivor’s behaviour.
In many cases, those who lead coordination are responsible for setting the standard for ethical,
safe and effective programming. They must therefore make certain that all parties participating
in coordination understand the core principles and key approaches that guarantee ethical, safe
and effective programming, The personal biases or attitudes of coordination partners must
not compromise these guiding principles, and all partners must take a unified approach in
implementing programming.
Resources
IS 1.3
Manual (UNFPA and Ghent University, 2010). To be posted to the GBV AoR website Spring
2010. Contact Erin Kenny for more information about the manual: [email protected]
UNHCR, “A Community-based Approach in UNHCR’s Operations” (January 2008).
http://www.unhcr.org/47f0a0232.html
UNHCR, “Tool for Participatory Assessment in Operations” (May 2006).
Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION 21
Section One: GBV BASICS
and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION
4. The international legal framework
In 2006, the IASC issued new guidelines on humanitarian assistance in natural disasters: Protecting
Persons Affected by Natural Disasters: IASC Operational Guidelines on Human Rights and Natural
Disasters. These guidelines focus on human rights challenges that are often neglected during
natural disasters and serve as a reminder that “human rights are the legal underpinning of all
1
Adapted from Bossman, M., PowerPoint presentation for training on Coordination of Multi-Sectoral Response to
Gender-based Violence in Humanitarian Settings (Ghent, Belgium, 2008).
22 Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION
humanitarian work pertaining to natural disasters” (p. 9). In fact, they serve as a reminder that
human rights are the basis of ensuring protection and therefore underpin all humanitarian work.
Understanding and expressing the human rights aspects of humanitarian intervention is crucial
when combating GBV. Addressing GBV requires efforts to ensure that the discriminatory policies
and practices that are its foundation are eradicated. All those working on GBV prevention and
response therefore have a responsibility to familiarize themselves with the international, regional
and national laws and standards that relate to GBV in order to act in accordance with them and
guide others—states, communities and individuals—to meet their obligations to promote and
protect human rights.
The IASC GBV Guidelines are very explicit about this responsibility as it relates to GBV partners’
roles in promoting protection for those at risk of GBV: “An important component of both
prevention of further violence and redress for sexual violence crimes is ensuring implementation
of and compliance with laws that promote the rights of communities to be free of sexual violence”
(p. 36). According to the IASC GBV Guidelines, protection responsibilities related to GBV
include advocating for the rights of victims of sexual violence and pressuring states to conform
to international standards that promote protection against sexual violence. All partners in GBV
coordination should therefore know the international legal framework that relates specifically to
GBV. (See Annex 2 for a list of major milestones related to GBV in the international legal framework.)
GBV partners should also be aware of the regional and national laws, policies, declarations and
programmes of action relevant to their setting.
Critical to know
IS 1.4
In September 2009, Security Council Resolution (SCR) 1888 was unanimously adopted by member
states. It is one of the most important SCRs for GBV partners to know and understand because it is much
more action-oriented than previous SCRs related to sexual violence. SCR 1888 builds on two earlier
resolutions: SCR 1325, adopted in October 2000, which provides a political framework that makes women
Resources
Annex
Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION 23
Section One: GBV BASICS
and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION
5. Protection from sexual exploitation and abuse
1. Sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds
for disciplinary measures, including summary dismissal.
Protection from sexual exploitation and abuse
2. Sexual activity with children (persons under the age of 18) is prohibited regardless of the age of
majority or age of consent locally. Mistaken belief in the age of a child is not a defence.
3. Exchange of money, employment, goods or services for sex, including sexual favours or other forms
of humiliating, degrading or exploitative behaviour, is prohibited. This includes any exchange of
assistance that is due to beneficiaries.
4. Sexual relationships between staff and beneficiaries of assistance, since they are based on inherently
unequal power dynamics, undermine the credibility and integrity of the work of the United Nations
and are strongly discouraged.
5. Where a United Nations staff member develops concerns or suspicions regarding sexual exploitation
or sexual abuse by a fellow worker, whether in the same agency or not and whether or not within the
United Nations system, he or she must report such concerns via established reporting mechanisms.
6. United Nations staff are obliged to create and maintain an environment that prevents sexual
exploitation and sexual abuse. Managers at all levels have a particular responsibility to support and
develop systems that maintain this environment.
24 Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION
Critical to know
The SGB details some of the ways in which PSEA activities should be implemented, including:
• Providing staff with copies of the SGB and informing them of its contents.
• Taking appropriate action when there is reason to believe sexual exploitation and abuse has
occurred.
• Appointing focal points and advising the local population on how to contact them.
• Handling reports of sexual exploitation and abuse confidentially.
The SGB clearly requires managers within UNCTs and humanitarian country teams to appoint focal
points and guide them in meeting their responsibilities. Also in light of the SGB, HCs/RCs have been
tasked with the responsibility of ensuring that an in-country network on PSEA, composed of PSEA
focal points, is operational and supporting the development and implementation of a country-level
PSEA action plan in their respective countries.
Unfortunately, there are many humanitarian settings in which there are no PSEA focal points
or PSEA in-country networks. In these settings, it sometimes falls to the GBV coordination
mechanism to undertake PSEA activities. While the GBV coordination mechanism may opt to
fill a gap in addressing PSEA in the short-term, e.g., by conducting awareness-raising amongst
humanitarian staff and people of concern about the SGB, PSEA responsibilities SHOULD NOT
be a regular and/or long-term function of the GBV coordination group. As per the box above,
identifying PSEA focal points and creating an in-country PSEA network is the responsibility of
senior managers and, ultimately, the HC/RC.
IS 1.5
However, PSEA is one important form of preventing GBV and is therefore linked to GBV
coordination efforts. There should be common understanding
of the different responsibilities of the PSEA in-country network Lesson learned
and the GBV coordination mechanism and willingness to In the 2008 GBV AoR global
The GBV Coordinator should also be sensitive to some of the challenges GBV service providers
may face if they are assigned the responsibility of acting as PSEA focal points in their agencies.
The SGB requires mandatory reporting of suspected incidents of SEA. However, the fundamental
guiding principles of GBV programmes—confidentiality and the right of the survivor to choose
how s/he would like to address an incident of GBV—are essentially contrary to mandated
reporting. Therefore, it may be useful for service-delivery agencies to develop special provisions
to address this contradiction, such as informing a GBV survivor of the mandate to report on SEA
before soliciting any case information during an interview.
Resources
For a comprehensive library of PSEA resources, tools and training materials, see the PSEA tools
repository at http://www.un.org/pseataskforce
Section One: GBV BASICS and how they relate to GBV COORDINATION 25
© UNICEF/NYHQ2005-1050/Radhika Chalasani
Section 2:
2
Introduction
GBV coordination
STRUCTURES
27
Section Two: GBV
coordination STRUCTURES
Introduction
This section deals with coordination structures in an attempt to articulate who is responsible in an
emergency for launching a GBV coordination mechanism, so that GBV Coordinators and others
are clear about where and with whom to undertake GBV coordination efforts.
The information sheets in Part A explain humanitarian reform and the ‘cluster approach’ structure
in which GBV—under the Protection Cluster—has a designated coordination mechanism
(differently referred to at the field level as an ‘Area of Responsibility’ (AoR), ‘ Working Group’ or
‘Sub-Cluster’, all of which are acceptable). The humanitarian reform process represents the first
time in the history of humanitarian intervention in which GBV coordination structures have been
made explicit, and it is therefore critically important that GBV actors understand humanitarian
reform and the cluster approach.
What is important to remember while reviewing this section is that all actors on the ground have
2
a responsibility to contribute to good coordination and to strengthen and enhance the protection
and care of women and children in situations of humanitarian crisis. According to the principles of
humanitarian aid and the international legal framework related to GBV (IS 1.4), the humanitarian
community, host governments, donors, peacekeepers, the UN and all others engaged in working
Introduction
with and for affected populations are collectively accountable for preventing and responding to
GBV.
Ensuring effective GBV coordination is the first step in meeting these responsibilities, in so far as
coordination efforts are key to constructing a unified and coherent multi-sectoral response. It is
especially important, therefore, that those with relevant GBV experience participate in building
coordination mechanisms and setting standards for comprehensive programming. However,
having a GBV coordination mechanism in place will have little impact unless all actors commit to
fulfilling their respective duties as outlined in the IASC GBV Guidelines. Coordination of cluster-
specific activities is the remit of each cluster, under the supervision of the cluster lead(s). While
GBV coordination mechanisms can assist in facilitating multi-sectoral GBV-related activities—by
drawing together partners, developing and overseeing a coordinated action plan and providing
expert technical guidance to other sectors/clusters—accountability for addressing GBV is shared
across all key sectors/clusters engaged in humanitarian response.
Lesson learned
Every effort should be made to mobilize resources to develop a GBV-specific coordination mechanism in
an emergency, as this is the best way to ensure that GBV issues are properly addressed across all clusters/
sectors and integrated into all areas of humanitarian response. In Myanmar following Cyclone Nargis,
a Women’s Protection Technical Working Group (the term ‘women’s protection’ was favoured over the
term ‘GBV’ for political and social reasons) was originally created within a Protection of Children and
Women (PCW) Cluster. Because the cluster focused primarily on children’s issues (partly due to the
fact that it was led by child-protection agencies), GBV issues were under-recognized. An evaluation
of the PCW Cluster three months after its inception recommended that there should be a separate
GBV coordination mechanism in order to more effectively coordinate women’s protection efforts.
The establishment of a sub-cluster dedicated to women’s protection resulted in greater prioritization
of women’s issues, including GBV, in several key multi-sectoral initiatives, such as the Post-Nargis
Response and Preparedness Plan, various donor appeals and the Myanmar Contingency Plan.
Prior to the introduction of humanitarian reform and the cluster approach, there were no
standardized methods for introducing GBV coordination mechanisms in humanitarian emergencies.
Although the IASC GBV Guidelines (drafted just prior to the implementation of humanitarian
reform) provide important directives for GBV coordination in any humanitarian context, the
cluster approach offers an explicit structure in which GBV coordination can be established from
the onset of an emergency. As explained further in IS 2.A.2-4, GBV has been designated as one of
five Areas of Responsibility (AoR) under the Protection Cluster. As such, it is critically important
that all those working on GBV coordination in clusterized countries understand the structure and
intent of humanitarian reform.
In 2005 an independent assessment was commissioned by the IASC and the UN Emergency Relief
Coordinator (ERC) (see text box, above) to evaluate the capacity of humanitarian agencies to
respond to complex emergencies and natural disasters. The results of the assessment underscored
the need for a more reliable humanitarian response.
Ensuring effective leadership of Ensuring adequate, timely and Ensuring adequate capacity and
HUMANITARIAN flexible predictable leadership in all areas
COORDINATORS HUMANITARIAN of humanitarian response through
(a high-level UN official FINANCING THE CLUSTER APPROACH
appointed at the country level by by
to ensure well-coordinated improving access to funds designating lead agencies
humanitarian response in an through the Central Emergency at the global and country
emergency) Response Fund (CERF), levels to assume coordination
by Pooled Funding, the Good responsibilities of key sectors
introducing mechanisms for Humanitarian Donorship of humanitarian response.
clearer accountability, Initiative and reform of the
appropriate training and Consolidated Appeals Process
adequate support of HCs/RCs. (CAP).
IS 2.A.1
As illustrated above, the foundation of the humanitarian reform process is partnership, and
successful implementation of the cluster approach depends on all humanitarian actors working
as equal partners in all areas of humanitarian response. In an effort to facilitate partnership, the
Global Humanitarian Platform (GHP) was established in 2006 to offer a forum for the humanitarian
community to come together to share responsibility for improving humanitarian action. The
GHP has produced “Principles of Partnership” (Annex 3), which identifies five key components
Humanitarian reform
of effective partnership:
TRANSPARENCY
is achieved through dialogue
(on equal footing), with
EQUALITY an emphasis on early RESULT-ORIENTED
requires mutual respect between consultations and early sharing Effective humanitarian action
members of the partnership of information. Communication must be reality-based and
irrespective of size and and transparency, including action-oriented. This requires
power. The participants must financial transparency, increase result-oriented coordination
respect each other’s mandates, the level of trust among based on effective capabilities
obligations, independence and organizations. and concrete operational
brand identity and recognize capacities.
each other’s constraints and
commitments. Mutual respect
must not preclude organizations RESPONSIBILITY
from engaging in constructive Humanitarian organizations
dissent. have an obligation to each
Principles other to accomplish their task
COMPLEMENTARITY of responsibly, with integrity and
The diversity of the humanitarian Partnership in a relevant and appropriate
community is an asset if we build way. They must make sure
on our comparative advantages they commit to activities only
and complement each other’s when they have the means,
contributions. Local capacity is competencies, skills and
one of the main assets to enhance capacity to deliver on their
and build on. It must be made commitments. Decisive and
an integral part in emergency robust prevention of abuses
response. Language and cultural committed by humanitarians
barriers must be overcome. must also be a constant effort.
The IASC has agreed that the cluster approach should be the framework for response in major
new emergencies and that it should eventually be applied in all countries with Humanitarian
Coordinators. Twenty-five of the 27 countries with Humanitarian Coordinators are formally
implementing the cluster approach (as of 2009), and since 2006 eight countries with a Resident
Coordinator (but no Humanitarian Coordinator) have used the cluster approach to respond to
major new emergencies. For more specific country information, see: http://oneresponse.info/
Pages/default.aspx
Good to know
Recognition of the importance of addressing GBV is being introduced into the humanitarian reform process
in other important ways. The newly drafted Terms of Reference for the Humanitarian Coordinator
includes information about GBV, and the recently revised CAP guidelines also reference GBV. (See
IS 3.2 for more information on funding.) In addition, humanitarian reform has given expression to a
number of important issues related to effective humanitarian response that any and all actors engaged in
GBV coordination should consider. Gender, for example, has been identified as a cross-cutting concern
of all clusters; integration of gender equality into the work of the clusters enhances the protective
environment for those affected by emergencies and provides a critical foundation for prevention of
and response to GBV. The Principles of Partnership, in another example, are as relevant to building
partnerships within a GBV coordination mechanism as they are to the entire humanitarian community!
IS 2.A.1
Resources
http://ochaonline.un.org
Child Protection Coordinators’ Handbook 2009 for Clusters,
http://oneresponse.info/GlobalClusters/Protection/CP/Pages/Child%20Protection.
aspx
Coordination of Multi-Sectoral Response to Gender-Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Facilitator
Manual (UNFPA and Ghent University, 2010). To be posted to the GBV AoR website Spring
2010. Contact Erin Kenny for more information about the manual: [email protected]
Annex
The ‘cluster approach’ was adopted on 12 September 2005 by the IASC as the standard for
organizing international humanitarian response to any major emergency. As one of the four key
strategies of humanitarian reform, the cluster approach organizes the many actors addressing a
specific need in an emergency (such as shelter, water and sanitation, health, etc.) by coordinating
them under a lead agency that is accountable at the field level to the HC/RC, who in turn reports
to the global ERC. Although initiated by the UN, the cluster approach aims to close gaps, increase
predictability and strengthen the capacity of all humanitarian actors—not just those working
under the UN flag.
IS 2.A.2
organizations, and it has, in the past, lacked strategic leadership. This fragmented response has led
to gaps in services, duplication of efforts, insufficient engagement with government and national
actors and a lack of accountability for overall performance. The decision of the IASC to implement
a cluster approach is significant because:
Overview of clusters
of international actors that typically The approach builds
on lessons learned EFFECTIVE
respond to humanitarian emergencies
(UN agencies, the Red Cross from prior emergencies
Movement and NGOs) have agreed on and systematizes
a predictable, standing arrangement coordination practices OUTCOMES
for organizing their assistance most that have worked.
effectively.
At the field level, which clusters are adopted depends on a joint decision by the UN country
team and its NGO partners. This decision is based on the needs, resources and capacity in a
given setting. There may be settings where particular clusters are not needed (e.g., Logistics).
There may also be settings where particular clusters are merged (e.g., Health and Nutrition). Lead
agencies for priority clusters are also designated at the onset of an emergency. Most often, these
lead agencies are the same as those designated at the global level, unless the agency at the field
1
Although protection is designated as a cluster and therefore has specific responsibilities, it is also a cross-cutting issue
to the extent that all sectors have a responsibility to promote protection. Other issues under discussion as cross-cutting
include human rights, diversity and early recovery.
IASC clusters/sectors
Agriculture
Nutrition
Protection
Logistics
WASH
Shelter
Coordination
Education
Health
Recovery
Telecom
Camp
UNICEF WFP UNHCR UNICEF UNHCR FAO
/IFRC
WHO
OCHA, WFP, UNDP UNHCR/IOM UNICEF
UNICEF
At the global level, a ‘cluster lead’ (also sometimes referred to as a ‘sector lead’) formally commits
as an agency to take on a leadership role within the international humanitarian community in a
particular area of activity (cluster/sector), to ensure well-coordinated response and high standards
of predictability, accountability and partnership.
Overview of clusters
Cluster leads at the field level are also responsible for ensuring well-coordinated response and
high standards of predictability, accountability and partnership, and they further commit to act
as the ‘provider of last resort’ (see text box below) for that particular sector, when necessary.
Typically, the cluster leads at the field level will assign one or more individuals within their
agencies the primary responsibility for overseeing cluster activities. These individuals may act as
‘cluster coordinators’ or ‘cluster chairs’.2 Although UN staff often chair and coordinate a cluster,
coordinators under the cluster approach are responsible for representing the interests of the
cluster as a whole (including local NGOs and other civil society partners), not their agencies’
interests.
Critical to know
The provider of last resort concept is key to the cluster approach. It means that the global cluster lead
agencies commit their utmost to ensure that the response to an emergency is adequate and appropriate
and, when assuming cluster leadership at the field level, to make every effort to address any gaps themselves
if cluster partners are unable to. In field settings where the global cluster lead is not operational and the
cluster is therefore led by an agency that is different from the globally designated lead, the global lead
agency is still considered the provider of last resort and therefore is responsible for ensuring the field-
based lead fulfils designated cluster responsibilities.
Coordination efforts should always involve UN agencies, the Red Cross Movement and
international and local NGOs. Efforts to involve the government—when safe, appropriate, and
feasible—are also crucial in the cluster approach. The humanitarian reform effort, and especially
the adoption of the cluster approach, was launched to better support governments to respond to
2
Information about cluster leads, including the ‘provider of last resort’ concept, is described in the IASC Guidance Note
on Using the Cluster Approach to Strengthen Humanitarian Response (November 2006). See http://oneresponse.info/
Pages/default.asp
The Principles of Partnership (see IS 2.A.1 and Annex 3) that apply to all aspects of humanitarian
reform are implemented through the cluster approach by ensuring, for example, that:
Cluster decisions and the use of resources All actors (local and international) are able to
are transparent. participate in making key decisions for the sector.
The HC/RC makes sure the overall international response is strategic, well-planned, inclusive,
coordinated and effective. To do this, s/he is responsible for:
IS 2.A.2
►► Supporting inter-sectoral needs assessments.
►► Providing high-quality information management for the overall humanitarian response.
►► Supporting sectors through advocacy and resource-mobilization efforts.
Overview of clusters
Resources
The OneResponse website includes FAQs on humanitarian reform, as well as the IASC Guidance
Note on Using the Cluster Approach to Strengthen Humanitarian Response (November 2006) and
the IASC Operational Guidance on Designating Sector/Cluster Leads in Major New Emergencies
(May 2007).
http://oneresponse.info/Pages/default.aspx
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) website (“Humanitarian Response
Reform”):
http://ochaonline.un.org/ocha2006/chap6_6.htm
IASC website: http://www.humanitarianinfo.org/iasc/pageloader.aspx
Coordination of Multi-Sectoral Response to Gender-Based Violence in Humanitarian Settings: Facilitator
Manual (UNFPA and Ghent University, 2010). To be posted to the GBV AoR website Spring
2010. Contact Erin Kenny for more information about the manual: [email protected]
Groupe U.R.D and Global Public Policy Institute, Cluster Approach Evaluation Phase 2 (August 2009)
and Final Draft Terms of Reference, IASC Cluster Approach Evaluation Report (1st Phase, 2007).
http://www.ochaonline.un.org/OchaLinkClick.aspx?link=ocha&docId=1123073
Child Protection Coordinators’ Handbook 2009 for Clusters,
http://oneresponse.info/GlobalClusters/Protection/CP/Pages/Child%20Protection.
aspx
Annex
What is the Protection Cluster (PC)? The Protection Cluster Working Group
• The work of the PC at the global level
The Protection Cluster is one of the 11 recognized is conducted through the PC Working
global clusters. Established in 2005, it is the main Group (PCWG) and is chaired by
forum for coordinating protection activities in UNHCR, which is the lead agency for
humanitarian action—including GBV—and covers a protection at the global level.
wide range of activities that aim to ensure the rights of • The PCWG is accountable to the UN
all individuals are respected, regardless of their age, ERC.
gender and social, ethnic, national, religious or other • See Annex 4 for the IASC PCWG Info
Note.
background.
The PC represents the first systematic attempt by the humanitarian community to bring together
protection actors, which include UN human rights, humanitarian and development agencies, as
well as non-governmental and other international organizations.
IS 2.A.3
UNHCR is the global lead agency for the Protection Cluster. However, at the country level in
natural-disaster situations or in complex emergencies without significant displacement, the three
protection-mandated agencies (UNHCR, UNICEF and OHCHR) have committed to consult closely
and, under the overall leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator/Resident Coordinator, agree
which among them would assume the role of cluster lead for protection.
Protection Cluster
How does the Protection Cluster’s mandate and structure differ from other
clusters?
Unlike other clusters, the PC is organized with a two-tier/dual mandate architecture. The first tier
(the overall Protection Cluster) addresses comprehensive and integrated protection interventions,
with the goal of making “the whole larger than the sum of the parts.” The second tier (the Areas of
Responsibility) addresses specialized protection issues in order to facilitate inter-agency response
to meet programmatic and geographic gaps in the respective specialized areas.
Child Protection GBV Mine Action Housing, Land & Rule of Law &
UNICEF UNICEF/UNFPA UNMAS Property Justice
UNHABITAT UNDP/OHCHR
The PCWG divided some of the key areas of protection into overarching and generally applicable
‘functional components’ or Areas of Responsibility (AoR). These AoRs are meant to strengthen
protection coordination, policy, capacity and response according to their respective focus. The
responsibilities of these AoRs are comparable to the work of any of the clusters (including in terms
of acting as providers of last resort; see IS 2.A.2 and IS 2.A.4). The difference is that the AoRs
function under the umbrella of the Protection Cluster.
Just like global activities, focal point arrangements can be—but do not have to be—made at the
country level. It is the role of the PCWG, country teams and the HC/RC to decide what coordination
structure best suits the situation on the ground, including determining whether specific AoRs
should be launched and, if so, matching AoRs with focal point agencies. The decision depends
on the specific context. It takes into account existing protection risks and gaps, which may change
over time, and the expertise and operational capacity of the agencies working in the country.
Setting standards In light of its diverse membership, the PCWG plays an important role in
and policies developing joint policies, standards and tools related to protection. This
includes providing legal and operational guidance about protection for staff and
IS 2.A.3
partners in the field. The PCWG also identifies and evaluates good practices in
protection and makes them available for adaptation and replication elsewhere.
Strengthening the The PCWG works to build the response capacity in protection by developing
capacity for protection training materials; training staff and partners at the local, national, regional and
international levels; and supporting the work of surge capacity and standby
rosters with qualified protection staff for rapid deployment to emergencies.
Protection Cluster
Providing The PCWG can provide operational support and guidance to humanitarian
operational support teams at the country level, if and when requested, in both cluster and non-
cluster countries. Support can be given by various means, including:
• Undertaking support missions to help identify protection gaps and
develop response strategies.
• Providing technical support and policy advice.
• Providing guidance on mainstreaming human rights, age, gender and
diversity, and HIV.
• Strengthening protection capacity, including through training.
• Supporting global advocacy and resource mobilization on protection.
Mainstreaming Protection is a cross-cutting issue. This means it should be integrated into all
protection aspects of humanitarian response. All humanitarian actors share a responsibility
to ensure that their activities do not lead to or perpetuate discrimination, abuse,
violence, neglect or exploitation. All activities should promote and respect
human rights and enhance protection. The Protection Cluster helps ensure that
protection is mainstreamed into the work of other clusters and sectors.
At the field level, the PC is responsible for meeting the generic responsibilities outlined in the
IASC Guidance Note on Using the Cluster Approach to Strengthen Humanitarian Response (http://
oneresponse.info/Pages/default.aspx) and customizing them to the protection environment of a
particular country operation. As such, the PC brings together a variety of national and international
actors in order to ensure timely, appropriate and comprehensive response to a variety of specific
protection concerns elaborated in the master list of protection problems in Annex 5. The PC also
is responsible for facilitating integration of protection concerns into the work of other clusters and
sectors. Thus, the PC at the field level is responsible for targeted protection work, as well as
mainstreaming protection. One component of mainstreaming protection involves promoting the
integration of relevant cross-cutting issues (human rights, gender, diversity, mental health and
psychosocial support and HIV/AIDS) into cross-sectoral work.
Annexes
The GBV AoR is one of five ‘functional components’ of the Protection Cluster. It is the first formal
effort to establish a globally standardized mechanism for facilitating a multi-sectoral approach to
GBV prevention and response.
At the global level the work of the GBV AoR is conducted by the GBV AoR Working Group (GBV
AoR), which is led jointly by UNFPA and UNICEF. On a daily basis the GBV AoR is co-chaired by
UNICEF or UNFPA and an international NGO. UN leadership rotates between the two agencies
on an annual basis, and every year a new NGO co-chair is elected. The GBV AoR is accountable to
UNHCR as the PCWG lead. More information on the role of co-leads and co-chairs of the global
GBV AoR can be found in the GBV AoR Terms of Reference (TOR) in Annex 6.
At the field level the GBV AoR may alternatively be known as the GBV Sub-Cluster or GBV
IS 2.A.4
Working Group. In settings where this language is unfamiliar or ill-advised, coordination
partners may opt to name the coordination structure something more culturally and/or politically
appropriate, such as Women’s Protection. The Guidance Note on Determining Field-level Leadership of
a GBV Area of Responsibility Working Group provides general information about determining GBV
leadership at the field level as described below and in Annex 7, but stresses there is no set formula
for determining which agency(ies) (and which individual(s) within that agency/ies) assumes
What is the overall objective of the What is the overall objective of the GBV AoR
GBV AoR at the global level? at the field level?
The following general rules can guide field actors in determining an appropriate leadership
structure for GBV coordination. These decisions must be informed by participatory processes that also
encourage local co-leadership.
2. Where there is a no Protection Cluster but GBV has been identified as a priority area of
concern and the cluster system is in place: UNFPA and UNICEF should coordinate with other
relevant entities and NGOs to support and/or establish an inter-agency GBV coordination
body, in line with the actions outlined in the Guidance Note found in Annex 7.
GBV Area of Responsibility
3. Where there is a no cluster system is in place: UNFPA and UNICEF should coordinate
with other relevant entities and NGOs to support and/or establish an inter-agency GBV
coordination body, in line with the actions outlined in the IASC GBV Guidelines. (See IS 2.B.3)
This body should always be considered first as a potential forum for coordinating GBV in a
cluster context. Parallel structures should not be established unless absolutely necessary. Rather,
consideration should be given to making the existing structure stronger and sustainable.
IS 2.A.4
and possibly by also developing a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the co-leads.
(See IS 4.3 on developing TORs.)
What is the relationship between the GBV coordination mechanism and the
Protection Cluster?
There should be close communication and collaboration between the Protection Cluster and the
GBV AoR, through regular reporting and information-sharing processes, as well as attendance by
the GBV AoR Coordinator(s) at all Protection Cluster meetings.
What is the relationship between the GBV coordination mechanism and other
clusters?
In addition to its responsibility to address specific protection concerns related to GBV, the
GBV coordination mechanism should work with other clusters to ensure that GBV prevention
and response activities are integrated into cluster strategies, workplans, programming, etc., as
leads. (See IS 3.5 on mainstreaming responsibilities, actors on the ground should consult with
GBV into other clusters/sectors.) the UN Humanitarian Team for troubleshooting purposes.
Resources
For regularly updated information about where GBV coordination mechanisms have been
GBV Area of Responsibility
implemented in emergencies around the world and their leadership structures, visit the GBV AoR
website. Also note that the GBV AoR is initiating a Community of Practice in order to strengthen
communication networks amongst those working on GBV coordination in emergencies that will
also be accessible on the AoR website: http://gbv.oneresponse.info
Annexes
What is UN Action?
United Nations Action Against Sexual Violence in Conflict (UN Action) is a network of 12 UN
system entities (listed below) launched in March 2007. The network’s goal is to end sexual violence
occurring during and in the aftermath of armed conflict. UN Action embodies the UN system’s
response to Security Council Resolutions 1820 (June 2008) and 1888 (September 2009), which
frame conflict-related sexual violence as a threat to international peace and security. When there
is a breakdown in the UN’s response to GBV at the field level, members of the GBV coordination
group can reach out to UN Action for assistance with advocacy to ensure that all 12 UN Action
entities are working in a collaborative and complementary manner. This might also include
reaching out to UN Action for assistance in bridging the gap between humanitarian intervention
and peacekeeping/security or for catalytic funding to ignite appropriate UN entity action.
IS 2.B.1
UN Action against sexual violence in conflict
What are the objectives of UN Action?
UN Action seeks to augment existing efforts by the UN system and its peace-support operations to
improve coordination and accountability, to amplify programming and advocacy and to support
national efforts to prevent sexual violence and respond effectively to the needs of survivors.
Country-level action: supporting joint strategy development and programming by UNCTs and
DPKO (in collaboration with GBV coordination structures on the ground), including building
operational and technical capacity.
Advocating for action: raising public awareness and generating political will to address sexual
violence as part of the broader campaign to Stop Rape Now.
Learning by doing: creating a knowledge hub on the scale of sexual violence in conflict and
effective responses by the UN and partners.
►► Generate public awareness and condemnation of the use of sexual violence as a tactic of
war.
►► End impunity for perpetrators of conflict-related sexual violence.
►► Foster good practices in prevention of sexual violence and protection of civilians at risk.
►► Improve and scale-up services for survivors.
IS 2.B.1
►► Address the longer-term impacts of sexual violence on communities, recovery and national
development.
The coordinated efforts of humanitarian actors to address GBV through the Protection Cluster
(where it is operational) or other coordination fora is an essential pillar of any comprehensive
programming to tackle sexual violence in conflict. Prevention and response activities need to be
fully coordinated and, where appropriate and safe, include efforts to address issues of impunity.
The UN Action network aims to harmonise the work of all UN system entities—including peace
and security actors (such as DPKO and DPA) and development actors—in order to contribute to
and supplement the work of the GBV AoR or other GBV coordination mechanisms.
Resources
UN Action website:
http://www.stoprapenow.org/about.html
There are currently eight UN missions authorized by the Security Council to protect civilians under
imminent threat of physical violence. For many reasons, however, it is difficult to protect civilians
from sexual violence, even though peacekeeping
UN Peacekeeping Missions operations are trying. Participants at a conference
MINURCAT – Central African Republic on the issue held in 2008 agreed that not enough is
MINUSTAH – Haiti
being done by peacekeepers to protect women and
MONUC – DR Congo
UNAMID - Darfur
children from widespread and systematic sexual
UNIFIL - Lebanon violence during conflict, even though the credibility
UNMIL - Liberia of UN peacekeepers largely depends on a visible
UNMIS - Sudan and tangible response to this issue.1 The absence of a
UNOCI - Côte d’Ivoire synergy between peacekeeping departments, the full
range of UN entities and humanitarian response actors
IS 2.B.2
is primarily why UN Action Against Sexual Violence in Conflict was launched in 2007 (see IS
2.B.1). It is also why Security Council Resolution 1888 was called for: Security Council Resolution
1888 mandates peacekeeping departments to engage with GBV actors at both the global and field
levels to establish a more formal relationship with humanitarian response actors. It also aims to
establish a more formal bridge between the political and security sectors and the humanitarian
response sector.
UN peacekeeping missions
How do UN peacekeeping missions coordinate with the rest of the UN system
around sexual violence?
Since the adoption of Security Council Resolutions 1820 and 1888, and with the appointment of a
Special Representative to the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict, DPKO is putting in
place a more standardized structure to coordinate mission activities in addressing sexual violence,
including the deployment of women protection advisors in some peacekeeping missions.
1
See “Women targeted or affected by armed conflict: what role for military peacekeepers?”, Conference Summary.
May 27-29, 2008, Wilton Park, Sussex, UK. Available at: http://www.stoprapenow.org/about.html
The only truly different aspect of coordination in settings where there are no clusters is that
there will be no designated lead agency to take on the responsibility for initiating a coordination
IS 2.B.3
According to the IASC GBV Guidelines, there typically will be a group of organizations
responsible for humanitarian coordination, with one organization or individual providing overall
coordination and leadership. This coordinating group, in close collaboration with UNHCR and
other international and national agencies that have a specific protection and/or GBV mandate,
Coordination in settings where there are no clusters
as well as with gender theme groups, government actors (where feasible) and people of concern,
should take the following actions1:
Good to know
The multi-sectoral and interagency characteristics of GBV programming can make coordination very
challenging due to different personalities, opinions, interests, priorities and communication styles. “In
order to establish effective response services and prevention strategies, key stakeholders are needed to
participate in planning and implementation. First, we must identify these people. Then, we must find
ways to engage them to join us. We must know something about what motivates these individuals, and
try to provide it when feasible.” Source: JSI/RHRC, Training Manual for Multisectoral and Interagency
Prevention and Response to Gender-based Violence (2004).
1
Adapted from the IASC GBV Guidelines, pp.17-19.
IS 2.B.3
Coordination in settings where there are no clusters
Section 3:
3
Introduction
GBV coordination
FUNCTIONS
49
Section Three: GBV
coordination FUNCTIONS
Introduction
This section identifies the ‘what’ of coordination in terms of major tasks/activities. The information
sheets elaborate the priorities of any coordination mechanism, which include (in the order in which
they are presented in this section):
Those implementing GBV coordination mechanisms should be familiar with all of the information
in this section in order to anticipate the activities that will be required from the onset of an
emergency to ensure effective coordination. It is important to note, however, that the information
provided in this section is not exhaustive: other responsibilities will certainly arise during
3
the coordination process. It is also important to remember that coordination is not just about
activities—it describes a process. Section four and Section five of this handbook focus more on
some of the process-related issues of coordination.
Introduction
What is the purpose of GBV coordination?
Critical to know
All coordination activities should be guided by principles—those promoted in the human rights-based,
survivor-centred and community-based approaches described in IS 1.3. A principled approach to
coordination involves (but is not limited to):
• Ensuring the needs of people of concern are taken into account, not just the needs of humanitarian
actors.
• Respecting all partners in the coordination process by setting up a regular procedure for
coordination, including: allocating sufficient human and financial resources to facilitate
coordination; having a specific and accessible meeting time and place; maintaining ground rules
and clear objectives; using time wisely; and being action-oriented.
• Avoiding duplication of efforts/supporting synergy and harmonization of action (and staying
vigilant to minimize competition among humanitarian actors).
• Developing allies and minimizing discord.
• Documenting research and decisions and SHARING them: promoting transparency whenever
possible.
• Making rational and appropriate use of local resources.
• Monitoring performance and impact of coordination efforts, especially on GBV programming.
• Preventing ‘burnout’ and diminished motivation by planning carefully and being clear about
roles and responsibilities.
• Creating opportunities for reflection, social cohesion/networking and enjoyment!
An information system for coordination relates to collecting and sharing information that is
essential to effective coordination. It should not be confused with collecting and sharing data
related to incidents of GBV, which is discussed in IS 3.9. Information-collection and -sharing is
critical to ensuring that the coordination mechanism is active, well-managed and transparent.
Some of the key information to collect and share includes (but is not limited to):
THE 3 Ws-Who, What and Where There are many types of information that should be
shared to facilitate coordination activities, but one of the
most important is the mapping of the 3 Ws in all of the key areas related to GBV prevention
and response (health, psychosocial care, legal aid, gender, etc). Identifying GBV actors, their
programmes and their geographic coverage is a critical first step in establishing and maintaining
a coordination mechanism. It assists GBV Coordinators in identifying key partners for inclusion
in the coordination mechanism and it also helps to reveal gaps in coverage that can inform action-
planning and proposals for funding. Ongoing mapping of the 3 Ws further assists in monitoring
IS 3.1
improvements in programming and persistent gaps. (See Annex 8 for a sample of the 3 Ws form
used by the Kenya GBV Sub-Cluster.)
GBV Coordination Mechanism Documents These documents might include the Terms of
Reference of the GBV coordination mechanism(s)
Rapid Assessments of GBV and other These include only those research documents that have
Public Research Documents on GBV been prepared for public dissemination and therefore
meet standards
Critical to know
of safety, security and confidentiality. (See IS 3.9 on
conducting assessments.) Information about specific incidents
of GBV should NOT be shared and
Training Schedule and Materials This would include a special care should be taken about
distributing any collated data: all
calendar of GBV and
guiding principles associated with
gender-related training events and all training materials ethical and safe data collection must
used by GBV partners, as well as international training be upheld; a standard system for
materials such as the IASC Caring for Survivors Training. (See sharing data should be developed
Annex 9 for a sample training information matrix.) and agreed upon by partners; and
no identifying information should
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) SOPs are the be included in any of the data
operational summaries. (See IS 3.9 for more
guidance procedures at the field level, and where there are information about ethical and safe
no security concerns about sharing field protocols, making data collection and sharing.)
copies of all SOPs publicly available can be useful for those
working in and travelling to field locations, as well for those working at the national level. (See IS
3.6 on supporting development of SOPs.)
Press Releases and Other Information-related Documents The GBV coordination mechanism
Produced by the Coordination Mechanism
may from time-to-time produce
press releases or other educational
information related to GBV issues in the affected setting(s), such as donor fact sheets or information
sheets for other humanitarian sectors. (See IS 3.4 on working with the media.)
Standard GBV Resources Ideally, information-sharing would include making key documents,
such as the IASC GBV Guidelines, Mental Health and Psychosocial
Support Guidelines, HIV Guidelines, and the Gender Handbook, accessible to GBV partners as
well as to members of other cluster/sectors.
When technology is available and accessible, the easiest way to manage and share information
is to develop a coordination website. In settings where the Internet is available, OCHA will
typically establish a website dedicated to cluster and other coordination activities; in this case,
the information manager can work with OCHA to ensure the GBV site is well-organized and
Developing an information system for coordination
continuously updated with information. The URL for the site can then be included in any public
information that is shared about the GBV coordination mechanism. (One example is the Kenya
GBV Sub-Cluster webpage developed in 2008, following post-election violence: http://www.
humanitarianreform.org/Default.aspx?tabid=521.)
Annexes
IS 3.2
Onset up to 6 months
articulate humanitarian needs, priority sectors for
1st response, response plans, and roles and responsibilities.
(UN, IOM, NGOs and governments through partners)
In the initial five to 10 days after the onset of an emergency, details of individual GBV projects
may need to be submitted for a Flash Appeal. The GBV Coordinator should aim to do this as part
of a systematic planning process promoting an inter-agency strategic framework. If information
about the GBV partners is not yet available because the coordination mechanism is not fully
functional, the GBV Coordinator should at minimum ensure that money to support coordination
efforts is solicited through the initial Flash Appeal.
►► Facilitating the collection of information about ongoing and proposed projects amongst
GBV coordination partners.
►► Providing necessary information to GBV partners about funding requirements and the
selection process.
►► Ensuring GBV projects submitted to the GBV coordination mechanism are channelled
through the appropriate clusters/sectors (e.g., GBV-related health projects through the
Health Cluster; GBV-related livelihoods projects through the Early Recovery Cluster;
GBV-related protection projects and more ‘general’ GBV projects through the Protection
Cluster; etc.).
►► Collaborating with government partners, the Protection Cluster (where existent) and other
clusters/sectors to ensure submissions are made according to the goals of multi-sectoral
programming and to promote transparency in project selection and submission processes.
Critical to know
Selecting projects for funding must be carefully managed, with special attention to transparency and
communication. It is critical to provide clear guidance and supporting information about pooled funding
mechanisms and their criteria. It may be useful to manage project selection through an ad hoc working
or advisory group of members of the GBV coordination mechanism. Particular care should be taken to
ensure group members are genuinely representative of the diverse interests within the GBV coordination
mechanism. A group dominated by international agencies, or with inadequate government and/
IS 3.2
It is also very important that the GBV Coordinator be a participant rather than a lead of this group, in
order to avoid giving the impression that s/he controls the funding processes and outcomes. The GBV
Coordinator may find her/himself in the difficult position of being hosted by an agency (such as UNFPA
or UNICEF) that is a donor. In this case, the Coordinator will have to make it clear to his/her host agency
and to GBV coordination partners what role s/he has in facilitating funding processes. It is important for
the GBV Coordinator to remain as neutral as possible in the funding process.
Other strategies to encourage sharing of funding information amongst partners include: ensuring
the involvement of agencies in the action-planning process within the GBV coordination mechanism
so that partners understand and agree on priorities for funding; making efforts to represent
the interests of as many GBV partners as possible in the projects submitted; and encouraging
collaborative projects that bring different actors together to share resources. Transparency and
participation are key.
The responsibility for obtaining funding does not cease when the initial crisis has waned. In
addition, funding sources are not limited to the UN system pooled-funding mechanisms described
above. The GBV Coordinator should become familiar with other sources of funding (and share
this information with GBV partners) and should also anticipate what the evolving GBV-related
funding needs may be as the GBV coordination mechanism and GBV coordination partners are
transitioning from emergency to early recovery to post-emergency and into development. Each of
these stages may require solicitation of different types of donors.
IS 3.2
through international and national of unfunded CAP appeal submissions. A high-
NGOs that are not eligible for direct level official of the US Embassy voluntarily hosted
funding through the CERF. See: http:// a donor event, to which traditional and non-
ochaonline.un.org/FundingFinance/ traditional donors (i.e., local corporations) were
ResponseFunds/tabid/4404/Default. invited.
A multi-donor trust fund (MDTF) is a mechanism through which donors pool their resources with
the intention of supporting national humanitarian, recovery, reconstruction and development
priorities. It is a useful additional source of funding after the immediate relief stage and helps
to reduce the burden of seeking and reporting on funding from multiple sources. The funds
are managed through an administrative agent such as UNDP, and the nature and requirements
for funding are determined based on the individual country context and programme or project
objectives. See: http://www.undp.org/mdtf/trustfunds.shtml
Traditional donors
The GBV coordination mechanism provides a useful platform for participants to develop
collaborative proposals for their traditional bilateral donors: USAID (BPRM, OFDA), ECHO, DFID,
CIDA, SIDA, Irish Aid, NorAid; private foundations (Novo, Avon, Johnson&Johnson); and UN
agencies (UNICEF, UNHCR, UNFPA, UNIFEM). Many donors encourage collective or consortia
bids, particularly bids that demonstrate partnerships with local organizations, and as such GBV
partners should use the collaborative assessment and planning process as a basis for building
relationships with other GBV agencies in order to pursue additional funding appeals.
The UN Trust Fund is the only multilateral grant-making mechanism that supports local,
national and regional efforts to end violence against women and girls. The grants have ranged
from US$100,000 to US$300,000 and support:
►► Awareness raising.
►► Advocacy for adequate budgetary allocation.
►► Multi-sector partnerships.
►► Development of sustainable capacities of judiciaries,law enforcement and health-service
providers.
►► Access of survivors to services.
►► Creation and strengthening of data-collection systems.
See: http://www.unifem.org/gender_issues/violence_against_women/trust_fund.php
Critical to know
To successfully raise funds, all GBV actors must be good advocates (see IS 3.3) and must find ways to
develop required skills. Essential to GBV fund-raising is:
• Demonstrating an understanding of the situation.
• Being able to clearly articulate needs and gaps and the steps necessary to fill those needs and gaps.
• Demonstrating an understanding of what other actors are doing and a willingness/plan to engage
with others to ensure a truly multi-sectoral and comprehensive response.
IS 3.2
Resources
Making appeals for GBV funding
Annexes
What is advocacy?
IS 3.3
Advocacy Raise awareness, use decision- Specific groups of influential
and policy-making to change people
the social environment
Conducting advocacy
Why is advocacy an important responsibility of a GBV coordination
mechanism?
The advocacy may best be undertaken by a GBV coordination subgroup and generally involves
the following steps:
Monitoring &
Data Collection Evaluation
STEP 1: GBV coordination partners begin with the ISSUE around which
they want to promote policy change. The issue is focused, clear and
perceived as important by the partners.
STEP 7: The GBV coordination partners RAISE FUNDS and mobilize other
resources to support the advocacy campaign.
Data collection is an ongoing activity throughout the advocacy process and may include researching
the position of a policy audience regarding the advocacy issue.
IS 3.3
Monitoring and evaluation take place throughout the advocacy process. Before undertaking
the advocacy campaign, it is important for the advocates to determine how they will monitor their
implementation plan. In addition, group members should decide how they will evaluate or measure
results. Can they realistically expect to bring about a change in policy, programmes or funding as a
Conducting advocacy
result of their efforts? How will the group know the situation has changed?
Depending on the context, advocacy strategies may be targeted at one or a combination of levels:
Community level:
This type of advocacy is frontline, community-based advocacy and most often
addresses affected communities and/or direct services to survivors. It involves
persuading local decision-makers, such as humanitarian organizations or local
leaders, to support holistic GBV responses. Local decision-makers include: managers
of camps for refugees or internally displaced persons, community leaders, religious
leaders, UN and other international coordination groups, local government leaders,
local law enforcement, judicial leaders and local civil-society leaders.
District/national level:
This type of advocacy addresses improving resources and perceptions to establish or expand
systems to address GBV wherever it occurs. Targeted decision-makers might include:
district-level government officials, national-level government officials, staff in humanitarian
coordination groups, staff at UN bodies providing regional or national support, international
and local NGOs.
International level:
This type of advocacy involves organizing meetings and establishing relationships with decision-
makers influencing policies and resources for the emergency. Targeted decision-makers might include
the RC/HC, senior staff at UN agencies, international governmental aid agencies, regional coordination
bodies and other international coalitions, alliances and NGOs. The aim of these advocacy actions is
to promote an increase in financial and human resources for survivors and also to draw attention to
immediate needs to establish interventions to address sexual violence.
►► Confidentially providing journalists with accurate information about GBV during an emergency
provides additional outlets for information. Ideally the GBV coordination mechanism will provide
recommendations to GBV partners on working with journalists. (See IS 3.4 on working with media.)
►► Educating international donor organizations is an ongoing priority for the GBV coordination
mechanism. (See IS 3.2 on making appeals for GBV funding.) Providing recommendations on how
and where donor funds can be most effective improves emergency response. In addition, donor
agencies have significant influence at the highest international decision-making levels.
IS 3.3
►► Working with the HC/RC to ensure that s/he is apprised of strategic and policy-level issues for
which the UN can facilitate advocacy and, when appropriate, lead the UNCT in joint advocacy
action.
Conducting advocacy
Resources
Why is it important for the GBV coordination mechanism to work with the
media?
How does the GBV coordination mechanism collaborate with the media?
The media can be an ally, and responsible1 journalists should be included as partners in any GBV
IS 3.4
coordination mechanism. Providing journalists with accurate information about GBV during an
emergency offers an outlet for information that can be used in strategic ways to effect positive
change. When working with journalists, however, it is important to understand the importance of
conveying appropriate messages, not only in terms of the ethical and safety issues associated with
sharing information, but also because of the high level of exposure media stories can generate.
Working with the media
It is also useful to remember that in order to engage effectively with the media, partners within
the GBV coordination mechanism will have to identify stories that are newsworthy. Partners also
may have to help journalists communicate an effective message, which usually means a message
comprised of the following elements (See Annex 12 on newsworthy stories and Annex 13 on
effective messages):
There are a variety of ways to engage with the media to get messages out there. The most likely
instruments are the press release and the interview.
Press conference A media event in which newsmakers (i.e., partners in the GBV coordination
mechanism) invite journalists to hear them speak and the press is given an
opportunity to ask questions.
Interviews When a person (or persons) is asked questions on a certain topic, for radio,
television or newspaper. If members of the GBV coordination mechanism
decide to give interviews on behalf of coordination partners, it is important to remember that not
everyone will be good at interviews. It may be helpful to identify specific spokespeople within the
coordination group. (See Annex 17 on solicited interviews; Annex 18 on unsolicited interviews;
and Annex 19 on handling controversy.)
IS 3.4
of journalists working
wider community, but also to determine whether GBV issues
throughout the country who
are being covered appropriately. If it is evident that journalists are willing to partner with
are not adhering to basic guiding principles when reporting a agencies and community
story, members of the GBV coordination body may decide to groups to advocate for the
Resources
Drezin, J., (ed.), Picturing a Life Free of Violence: Media and Communications Strategies to End Violence
Against Women (UNIFEM, 2001).
http://www.unifem.org/materials/item_detail.php?ProductID=8
Interpress Service and Gender Links, “Reporting GBV: A Handbook for Journalists”(2009).
http://www.ips.org/mdg3/GBV_Africa_LOWRES.pdf
Annexes
Too often, sectoral actors—those working in the areas of water/sanitation, shelter, food distribution,
etc.—will have limited to no experience in addressing GBV. Within the network of a ‘humanitarian
system’, GBV actors must therefore work with sectoral colleagues to promote multi-sectoral, inter-
agency action to prevent and respond to GBV and to encourage accountability of cluster/sector
leads in meeting their sector-specific GBV responsibilities.
The key to engaging cluster/sectors in GBV issues and activities is to educate and motivate
them about their responsibilities according to the IASC GBV Guidelines and the GBV Guiding
Principles (see IS 1.3) as well as the IASC Gender Handbook. Where necessary and feasible,
it is important to assist them in meeting their responsibility to mainstream GBV programming
into their work by reviewing and integrating GBV into sectoral needs assessments and analysis,
policy and programming documents, action plans, funding appeals, etc. (See Annex 21 for sample
sectoral information sheets on the GBV Guidelines; see Annex 11 for sample sectoral guidelines
on CAP submissions; see Annex 22 for sample sectoral information sheets on the IASC Gender
Handbook; see Annex 23 for a Gender Tip Sheet for Cluster/Sector Leads.)
IS 3.5
In an emergency context, sectoral actors may be somewhat reluctant to take on GBV issues
because they are already overwhelmed with the more standard challenges associated with their
sector. Therefore, constant communication and monitoring of sectoral activities are important
components of GBV cross-sectoral coordination activities. The challenge is figuring out how to
create the means for this collaboration.
Ideally, cluster/sector leads would participate in the GBV coordination mechanism by attending
all GBV coordination meetings. Unfortunately, given the number of meetings cluster/sector leads
are required to attend, voluntary participation in GBV coordination meetings is unlikely. More
realistic options include:
►► Making periodic presentations to cluster leads at the OCHA cluster lead meetings
(usually held at the national level once a week during an emergency).
►► Helping the cluster/sector leads identify someone with sufficient authority and
commitment within their coordination group to represent their cluster/sector at all
GBV coordination meetings. While important in terms of facilitating collaboration, it
should be emphasized that this strategy is not likely to result in significantly improved
knowledge of GBV issues across all the clusters/sectors, because many of the cluster/
sector representatives attending GBV coordination meetings will (presumably) not be
experts on GBV.
collaboration
What are the responsibilities of the GBV Focal Points who participate in other
cluster/sector meetings?
It can often be intimidating for FPs to speak up in meetings with partners who may not be
enthusiastic about their presence or about addressing the issue of GBV. FPs therefore should
be briefed on their responsibilities as well as on strategic communication, so they know their
IS 3.5
key messages and are able to deliver them succinctly and effectively. (See IS 5.2 for additional
information on strategic communication.)
Good practice
As described in IS 2.A.4, a GBV coordination mechanism that is developed under the Protection
Cluster will be responsible for reporting to the Protection Cluster on its activities, and the GBV
Coordinator should participate in all Protection Cluster meetings to facilitate collaboration and
communication. The GBV coordination mechanism should further ensure that all GBV-related
protection work is not only closely linked with the work of the larger Protection Cluster, but also
with the other AoRs within the Protection Cluster (such as Child Protection, Rule of Law and
Justice, etc.). As such, it will be important for the GBV Coordinator and/or designated FPs within
the GBV coordination mechanism to attend AoR meetings on a regular basis.
Are there special considerations when collaborating with the Health Cluster?
Generally speaking, outside of the Protection Cluster (where one exists), the GBV coordination
mechanism is likely to work most closely with the Health Cluster. The Health Cluster has very
specific GBV-related responsibilities, e.g., implementation of the MISP (see IS 1.2), and the GBV
coordination mechanism should assist the Health Cluster—and WHO as the provider of last resort
(see IS 2.A.4)—to meet those responsibilities in whatever ways possible.
In addition, mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) is a cross-cutting issue that is
relevant to GBV work and usually sits within the Health or Protection clusters or is addressed
in a cross-sectoral working group. It is important for a GBV FP to attend MHPSS meetings and
promote issues of GBV, including survivor support.
Annexes
IS 3.6
What is the process for developing SOPs?
Good to know
One of the most important aspects of developing
Experience indicates that it may be useful to develop specific SOPs for different settings within
a given country. Each setting will have different actors, services and considerations. All key
While it is important, especially in the early stages of an emergency, that SOPs are developed
as quickly as possible so that basic survivor-care services and essential prevention activities are
put into place rapidly, it may not be possible to develop the entire SOPs document according to
the IASC template quickly enough to meet immediate needs in the crisis phase of an emergency
situation.
Developing SOPs can be a very public process that brings attention to the models for GBV
response and partners’ responsibilities. In settings where GBV issues are not politicized and
there is support for GBV programming, this exposure is one of the key benefits of drafting SOPs.
However, in settings where GBV issues are highly politicized and there may be security risks
in publicly discussing and developing GBV services, GBV Coordinators and GBV coordination
partners should proceed with extreme caution.
In these cases, it may be most effective in the earliest stages of an emergency to develop an
abbreviated referral protocol for survivors and distribute it only to those who fully understand
the GBV guiding principles associated with working with survivors. When and if the situation
improves—or when more partners are identified through a safe network of service providers—
more comprehensive SOPs may be developed. (See Annex 26 for Darfur Referral Pathway and
Annex 27 for Darfur Referral Protocol Narrative for examples of strategies used to address safety
and security concerns.)
Establishing Standard Operation Procedures for multi-sectoral and inter-organizational prevention and
response to GBV in humanitarian settings (SOP Guide) (IASC Gender SWG, 2008).
http://oneresponse.info/crosscutting/gender/Pages/Gender.aspx
Annexes
IS 3.6
Supporting the development of Standard Operating Procedures
efforts. The more partners understand and benefit from the collaborative process and from
others within the coordination mechanism, the more successful and cohesive the coordination
mechanism will be.
Promoting shared principles and practices: Another important reason for building capacity of
coordination partners is that all partners should speak—to the greatest extent possible—with the
same voice when promoting principles and programming related to GBV. For some partners, this
may require specialized training on key theories and models.
Ensuring delivery of efficient, effective and ethical programming: Yet another reason for building
capacity is to ensure the ultimate goals of coordination in emergencies—delivering comprehensive,
ethical and safe services for survivors and introducing GBV prevention strategies—are achieved.
It is important for GBV Coordinators to remember that capacity-building can sometimes be very
targeted, as in providing training (see text box below). However, it also occurs in more subtle
ways: through modeling leadership, encouraging potential and promoting individuals’ and
agencies’ responsibility and accountability:
CAPACITY-BUILDING
WHAT YOU CAN DO:
INVOLVES:
Equipping people with skills • Ensure processes and procedures are clearly explained and
and competencies which they understood.
would not otherwise have. • Share information and resources to enable knowledge transfer.
• Translate key guidelines.
Promoting people’s ability • Use coaching skills to encourage individual and agencies’
to take responsibility for responsibility.
identifying and meeting • Use participatory problem-solving techniques.
their own, and other • Delegate responsibility where appropriate.
people’s, needs and rights.
Other specific methods for building capacity of GBV partners might include:
IS 3.7
the key methods for building capacity of
the media, advocacy, data collection, partners in an emergency because it requires
funding, IEC/BCC, drafting SOPs, a relatively small investment of technical and
etc.). GBV Coordinators should try to financial resources. At the outset of establishing
identify leaders of the sub-groups who a coordination mechanism, it may be useful to
►► Working individually with partners on key issues, including having them ‘shadow’
experts where learning opportunities exist, such as at media interviews, when speaking
with donors and/or government officials, while conducting rapid assessments, etc.
For key general resources to share with partners refer to the list in the Introduction to this
handbook. For more specific resources, refer to individual information sheets. Other noteworthy
training tools for building capacity of and among partners include:
Annexes
IS 3.7
The Inter-agency Field Manual on Reproductive Health provides the following description of IEC:
In short, IEC involves using participatory and community-based approaches (see IS 1.3) to promote
behaviours that improve health and well-being. The basic behaviour-change goals of IEC related
to GBV are usually two-fold: to reduce the incidence of GBV and to ensure that those who have
IS 3.8
experienced GBV are enabled to seek the care they need.
IEC messages can be delivered a variety of ways: through interpersonal communication (such as
individual discussions, group discussions and community meetings and events) or mass-media
communication materials
Developing information, education and
communication (such as radio, television and other forms of one-way communication, including
brochures, leaflets and posters, visual and audio-visual presentations and some forms of electronic
communication).
In the early stages of an emergency, IEC related to raising awareness of sexual violence should
have the following objectives:
Once an emergency stabilises, coordination partners can consider the development of more
elaborate and formal IEC strategies. Whatever IEC materials and activities are developed, it
is important to ensure that IEC efforts are coordinated and that all messages (and the media
used to convey those messages) are complementary. It is also vital to ensure that people are
provided with the necessary support and resources to act in accordance with the messages.
Identify existing resources and potential channels for communication that can be mobilized
1 to inform the community about prevention of and response to sexual violence (and other
forms of GBV that have been identified).
Compile a resource list of organizations and services related to prevention of and response
2 to sexual violence. Establish coordination and referral mechanisms and orient all partners—
government, local and international NGOs, UN agencies—about them.
IS 3.8
Work with GBV coordination partners and the community to determine the key messages
3 to be disseminated, based on a situational analysis and the resources available in the setting.
Adapt or develop simple methods and materials to communicate the messages according to
communication materials
Developing information, education and
4 input of coordination partners and the community. Work with the community to conduct
pre-testing.
Resources
“Through Our Eyes: Participatory Communication for Community Empowerment and Social
Change” (ARC, ongoing).
http://www.arcrelief.org/throughoureyes
UNFPA, Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations: An Inter-Agency Field Manual (1999), Appendix
One.
http://www.unfpa.org/emergencies/manual/a1.htm#Further
IASC, Guidelines for Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Settings: Focusing on
Prevention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies (2005).
http://gbv.oneresponse.info
Annexes
1
Summarized from the IASC GBV Guidelines, Action Sheet 10.1, pp 76-77.
Why are facilitating assessments and ensuring data collection key functions
of the emergency coordination mechanism?
Overseeing information-gathering regarding GBV issues and helping partners use that information
to inform their activities is central to the work of the coordination mechanism. Safe and ethical
information-gathering about the nature and scope of GBV as well as about the availability,
utilization and effectiveness of services in a given setting ensures that the priorities identified
by coordination partners are evidence-based, so that project development and implementation,
policy work, funding solicitation, advocacy efforts, etc., are all rooted in identified problems and
related needs.
The most important consideration before engaging in any type of GBV data collection
is how the information can be used to safely promote protection (which includes all
prevention and response activities) for those at risk.
IS 3.1 addresses the types of information a GBV coordination mechanism might collect and share
IS 3.9
about the capacities and activities of GBV partners within the coordination mechanism. This
information sheet provides summary guidance on undertaking a situational analysis of GBV in
affected communities, as well as collecting and analyzing data related to GBV incidents. Each
type of information-gathering is critical to leading coordination activities.
As is depicted in the illustration in Annex 33, action-planning within the GBV coordination
mechanism occurs in a cycle. The very first stage of the cycle—the foundation of all action
planning—involves conducting an assessment of the situation, sometimes referred to as a
‘situational analysis’. The IASC GBV Guidelines clarify the overall goal of a situational analysis in
the earliest phases of an emergency (when the focus is more likely to be on sexual violence):
While beneficial, rapid assessments do not usually involve in-depth analysis. Therefore, they
do not provide the kind of detailed information that is necessary to design comprehensive GBV
programming. For this reason, the IASC GBV Guidelines further recommend that wherever
resources exist, efforts should be made to conduct a specific, GBV-focused assessment. When
planning a GBV assessment, there are several guidelines that should be followed:
►► Be realistic in terms of timing and resources agency nature of the research, there
available to collect data. In the early stages of was significant buy-in on the findings.
an emergency, the goal is to collect information Therefore, many partners (including the
about the situation and produce a report as government) shifted their priorities and
quickly as possible—ideally within two weeks programming approaches to better meet
of launching the assessment. the evolving needs on the ground.
►► Adhere to the guiding principles in IS 1.3, as well as to international ethical and safety
standards for collecting information on sexual violence during an emergency. (See Annex
34 for guidelines on reporting and interpreting sexual violence data and Annex 35 for a
summary of ethical and safety recommendations related to researching violence against
women.)
The GBV Tools Manual (see below) has a sample situational analysis tool that can help GBV actors
design a situational analysis and consider how to specifically apply some of the ethical and safety
guidelines/recommendations contained in Annex 34 and Annex 35. In general, a situational
analysis will include the following:
GBV ‘data’ is documented information or evidence of any kind that is related to GBV. It can be
qualitative (i.e., data that deals with descriptions, such as opinions and attitudes, and therefore
cannot be measured statistically) or quantitative (i.e., data that can be counted, and therefore can
be used as a measure). While qualitative data is easier to obtain and is therefore the priority at the
early stage of emergencies, there is often a high demand for quantitative data, particularly from
donors and policy-makers. It is reasonable to try and meet this demand to the extent possible—but
only after programming has been established. As such, it will be important for the coordination
mechanism to work with partners over time in order to develop standardized systems to access
IS 3.9
quantitative data, and in this process it is critical that data collection methods include information
about how to accurately analyze and present the data. In the early stages, it is also important that
GBV partners draw upon global data in order to anticipate some of the concerns that may arise in
the settings in which they work (see IS 1.1).
When considering data in the context of addressing GBV in humanitarian settings, the emphasis
should be on identifying trends and patterns in how a situation might be evolving and its impact on
women and girls, as this is key to developing prevention and response programmes.
It is nearly impossible—and potentially very dangerous!—to measure either the incidence or prevalence
of GBV in emergencies as they are both population-based, and therefore require methods such as
population-based surveys, which are costly, time-consuming and require very specialized methods
in order to address safety and security concerns.
Often the best we can do is collect information on reported cases (e.g., by reviewing case files and
inputting anonymous incident information into a database) or estimating magnitude based on
anecdotal information and focus group discussions.
Ideally, we should be using all available safe and ethical methods at our disposal to review, compare
and analyze data we have, using it to make informed decisions about programming needs.
Sharing GBV information is critical to coordination. However, we must have standards and systems
in place in advance of sharing any data to anticipate some of the serious safety and ethical issues that
could threaten the safety and well-being of survivors, communities and those involved in collecting
information. All data-sharing must be confidential to protect the rights of the survivor!
In hostile political environments where data-collection and -sharing is potentially very dangerous,
special provisions should be developed about how data is to be managed.
questions and address ethical and safety concerns. For more information about the GBVIMS Project and
data collection and analysis tools, contact [email protected].
Resources
Conducting assessments and ongoing data collection
General
Sample Assessments
UNFPA, “GBV Assessment Report Kebri Beyah Refugee Camp, Somali Region, Ethiopia and
Shimelba Refugee Camp, from 19 February to 6 March 2007” (2007).
http://www.unfpa.org/emergencies/docs/gbv_assessment_ethiopia.pdf
UNFPA, UNICEF, UNIFEM and CCF, “A Rapid Assessment of Gender-based Violence During the
Post-Election Violence in Kenya, February 2008” (2008).
http://www.humanitarianreform.org/Default.aspx?tabid=521
“Inter-Agency Rapid Assessment Report on GBV in Camps and Areas of Return and Transit in
Northern Uganda, 19 December 2008” (2008).
http://www.ugandaclusters.ug/gbv.htm
“Joint Field Mission to Zimbabwe: UNICEF/UNFPA/IOM, May 2009” (2009). GBV AoR Resource
Library,
http://gbv.oneresponse.info
IS 3.9
Conducting assessments and ongoing data collection
Section 4:
4
Introduction
IMPLEMENTING a GBV
coordination MECHANISM
81
Section Four: IMPLEMENTING
a GBV coordination MECHANISM
Introduction
This section builds on the previous section about the ‘what’ of coordination by attempting to
describe the ‘when’ and, to some extent, the ‘how’ of coordination in terms of key start-up tasks
as well as ongoing responsibilities of the coordination mechanism. (See Section five for more
information about the ‘how’.)
The section begins with an information sheet on launching a coordination mechanism during an
emergency, which provides a rough timeline for the most important activities to be initiated within
the first month of an emergency. Several of the start-up activities identified in this information
sheet are targeted to settings where there is no pre-existing coordination mechanism. However,
as emphasized in IS 2.A.4, whenever feasible it is always preferable to work within existing
coordination mechanisms rather than to establish a parallel structure for emergency GBV
coordination, as this recognizes and builds on existing expertise and enhances the sustainability
of GBV coordination activities (see IS 4.7 on sustainability of coordination mechanisms). Working
within existing coordination mechanisms is also likely to be more efficient than establishing a
new GBV coordination body that is specific to an emergency.
4
The second information sheet reviews the importance of building inclusive membership,
identifying some of the potential benefits and challenges GBV Coordinators should consider when
soliciting participation of certain partners (e.g., the government) in the coordination mechanism.
Introduction
Information sheets three and four, respectively, review how to develop a TOR for the coordination
mechanism and draft an Action Plan—both critical responsibilities in moving the coordination
activities forward. Information sheet five discusses the benefits of identifying and supporting
coordination sub-groups, which can be tasked with some of the various responsibilities of the
coordination mechanism in order to improve accountability amongst coordination partners as
well as to increase the efficiency of the coordination mechanism.
Information sheet six discusses the importance of linking national coordination mechanisms with
regional and local coordination mechanisms, and information sheet seven highlights some of the
issues to consider when developing strategies to sustain GBV coordination structures after the
initial crisis period has passed.
Note that UNICEF and UNFPA (according to their AoR focal point agency responsibilities under
the cluster approach—see IS 2.A.4) have been designated as providers of last resort and therefore
have the responsibility to act as the ‘first responders’ to explore emergency coordination options
and gather together GBV partners in order to build consensus on the structure and purpose of the
coordination mechanism. While UNICEF and UNFPA are responsible for catalyzing action, they
should always seek out existing resources and build upon them. As is described in IS 2.A.1, the
cluster approach is meant to support national and local capacity, not replace it.
General
Key Objectives Checklist
Time Frame
1. Ensure those UNICEF and/or UNFPA designate staff to explore
responsible for GBV coordination possibilities.
implementing and/ Designated UNICEF and UNFPA staff meet with
or participating in UNHCR and/or the HC/RC to determine whether
GBV coordination a Protection Cluster will be put in place and to
understand the discuss/advocate with UNHCR and/or the HC/RC
importance of about the feasibility of developing a GBV-specific
prioritizing the needs coordination mechanism.
and rights of those
Designated UNICEF and UNFPA staff assess
vulnerable to GBV.
existing national coordination mechanisms to
Week 1 of Emergency
IS 4.1
will be established Designated UNICEF and UNFPA staff call an
at the national level emergency meeting of key UN, NGO and (where safe
(e.g., a separate and feasible) government representatives to discuss
GBV AoR under the strategies for establishing a national emergency GBV
Protection Cluster; an coordination mechanism and potential coordination
membership.)
• Feasibility and time frame for allocation of full-
time, mid- to senior-level GBV Coordinator.
• Strategies for soliciting funding through pooled
emergency funding mechanisms as well as other
IS 4.1
etc.
IS 4.1
responsibilities.
5. Develop methods
for building capacity
of GBV partners.
It is very likely that many of the objectives/activities listed above will not be completed in the
first month—nor should they, as most are ongoing. What is of critical importance is that they
are initiated. Moving them forward will then be the major focus of the coordination mechanism.
Some of the other activities that are not explicitly identified above but are of great importance—
such as working with the media, conducting advocacy, collecting and monitoring GBV data,
etc.—are described further in Section three on GBV coordination functions. Tips on building
and maintaining the momentum of the coordination mechanism are provided in Section five on
practical coordination skills.
Eventually, the coordination mechanism for GBV in the emergency phase will transition to
post-emergency and recovery. At this point, coordination leads and partners must determine
the means to sustain the coordination mechanism (although sustainability strategies should
be considered even from the start of implementing the GBV coordination body). (See IS 4.7 on
ensuring sustainability of coordination mechanisms.)
Annex
A7: GBV AoR Working Group Guidance Note on Determining Field-level Leadership of GBV
AoR Working Group (includes GBV Coordinator TOR)
Participation, transparency, equality—these are some of the principles of partnership that are
the cornerstone of humanitarian intervention (see IS 2.A.1), and they are also key to promoting
community-based methods for addressing GBV (see IS 1.3). In addition—and perhaps in more
than any other area of humanitarian response—addressing GBV requires a broad multi-sectoral
approach (see IS 1.2). Successful GBV coordination therefore depends on a wide variety
of sectoral actors—from policy-makers to advocates to programmers to people of concern—
working as partners to achieve safe, ethical and comprehensive GBV prevention and response
programming. If a GBV coordination mechanism is dominated by one particular sector and/
or one particular approach, it will be limited in its ability to achieve its goals. (For example, an
overemphasis by legal/justice and/or human rights partners on prosecution of GBV cases can
undermine the goals of a survivor-centred approach, in which survivors have access to a full
spectrum of services and have the right to determine their own course of action in addressing a
GBV incident.) Broad participation of multi-sectoral partners can be beneficial because it:
IS 4.2
The GBV AoR Guidance Note on Determining Field-level Leadership of a GBV AoR Working Group
(see Annex 7) calls upon the coordination mechanism to mobilize participation “by UN, NGO,
Red Cross/Red Crescent, and (as appropriate) donors and government actors.” Following the
principles of a community-based approach (see IS 1.3), people of concern should also be included
as active participants in the coordination mechanism wherever possible. Even more specifically
(as reviewed in IS 3.5), it is very important that representatives of other clusters/sectors attend
Critical to know
The GBV AoR’s 2008 review of global GBV coordination mechanisms concluded that “in terms of
sustainability, it would seem that the best models are those that include government (preferably with a
broader range of ministries included than just Ministry of Gender, which seems to be under-resourced in
all contexts) and where the government is supported early on to assume this responsibility.” However,
in some settings involving government actors in an emergency GBV coordination forum requires
very careful consideration of all the possible positive and negative consequences of this engagement,
including issues of security and sustainability.
For a GBV Coordinator to build inclusive membership, s/he must understand the benefits of
participation. A GBV Coordinator also must have the capacity to advocate for the participation of
particular agencies/groups, both to partners that are already participating in the GBV coordination
mechanism (to promote inclusiveness), as well as to those targeted for participation (to motivate
IS 4.2
them). The GBV Coordinator may need to pursue particular agencies/organizations/individuals,
especially in the early stages of building a coordination mechanism. At the same time, s/he
must be aware of some of the potential problems associated with including specific groups and
develop strategies to avert those problems.
IS 4.2
them with critical
assets to coordinate
post-crisis.
Donors • Gain a better • Ensures appropriate • May attempt to
Resources
Annex
A7: GBV AoR Guidance Note on Determining Field-level Leadership of GBV AoR Working
Group
A Terms of Reference describes the purpose and structure of the coordination mechanism,
providing a documented basis from which to carry out coordination activities. Creating a TOR
should be one of the first activities of the coordination mechanism (completed within the first
two to three weeks of meetings) in order to ensure a common understanding about coordination
leadership, membership and the nature, scope and objectives of coordination activities. TORs
should be created for all coordination mechanisms, from the national level down to the local level,
and in settings where there are multiple coordination mechanisms every effort should be made to
ensure that all TORs—at minimum—are consistent in their background information, definitions
of GBV and guiding principles. In settings where the emergency GBV coordination mechanism is
incorporated into a pre-existing coordination structure, it is still important to develop a TOR for
the emergency coordination body.
It is useful to remember that in the earliest phases In its global review of GBV coordination
of forming a coordination mechanism, the GBV mechanisms conducted in 2008, the GBV AoR
highlighted two key findings regarding TORs
Coordinator may need to take a more active role in
of coordination mechanisms. The first was that
ensuring key start-up activities are completed (see TORs were not often widely shared, so that
IS 5.1 on collaborative leadership). With this in
Developing the Terms of Reference
After agreement has been reached about the TOR, organizations may wish to ‘sign on’ to the TOR
by listing their names directly on the document. If this is not possible or recommended due to
security reasons, organizations should give their verbal agreement about the content of the TOR,
which should in turn be documented in coordination meeting minutes so that there is a record of
consensus about the TOR that can be referenced in the event conflicts about the nature/purpose
of the coordination mechanism arise in the future.
In general, a TOR should be kept to a maximum of two or three pages so that it can be read
quickly and easily. (See Annex 45 for a sample TOR from Afghanistan, Annex 46 for a sample
TOR from Uganda, Annex 47 for a sample TOR from Sudan and Annex 48 for a sample TOR from
Kenya.) After a TOR is completed, it can be used as an information-sharing document with new
coordination members as well as with the broader community. The TOR therefore should not
contain long lists of activities that are better left to a strategy document/action plan (see IS 4.4).
Some of the key components of a TOR are listed below:
2. Definition of GBV
A reference to how GBV is defined and the key types of GBV the
coordination mechanism is addressing (see IS 1.1 on understanding
GBV).
3. Overall purpose A very brief statement of the primary goal(s) and objectives of the
coordination mechanism.
IS 4.3
accountability, etc.).
10. Further contact Information regarding who may be contacted for further information
about the coordination mechanism.
The general content of TORs for national- and field-level coordination mechanisms is likely to be
very similar; the primary difference will be in functions/responsibilities. At the national level,
activities may be more broad-based and focus on policy, advocacy, oversight of information-
gathering, fundraising, etc., whereas at the local level activities may be more specifically related to
ensuring effective programming and monitoring. At the local level it is important to clarify with
coordination partners that the TOR for the coordination mechanism is distinct from SOPs. (See IS
3.6 on developing SOPs.)
Critical to know
In settings where the cluster approach has been initiated, it is important that decisions are made regarding
who is the provider of last resort (see IS 2.A.4) for GBV prevention and response. The provider of last
resort should be clearly identified, and their responsibilities should be outlined in the TOR.
Annexes
The very first action sheet (pp. 17-19) of the IASC GBV Guidelines highlights the responsibility
of the GBV coordination mechanism to develop a plan of action for coordination, prevention
of and response to GBV. An inter-agency GBV Action Plan is a document that provides a
vision for comprehensive GBV programming in an emergency, outlines priority objectives and
associated activities, allocates specific roles and responsibilities to various partners, and identifies
indicators for measuring whether objectives have been met. It increases accountability of the GBV
coordination mechanism by linking the work of the coordination mechanism to programming
efforts. An Action Plan is critical to both coordination and programming, in so far as it assists in
achieving the following results:
IS 4.4
for combating GBV so that all partners are united in the by the GBV AoR found that GBV
overarching approach to addressing GBV, which in turn coordination in the field has not
facilitates strategic thinking in programme development always managed to help promote
and implementation, as well as in coordination. joint strategic thinking and planning.
In addition, not all agencies had the
The indicators linked with the key activities in an Action Plan will
Monitoring and
allow the coordination mechanisms as well as all implementing
evaluating interventions
partners to measure the extent to which objectives are being met.
Because the successful implementation of an inter-agency Action Plan depends on the commitment
of all GBV actors, the process for developing the plan requires broad-based participation and buy-
in. To every extent possible, input into the Action Plan should be solicited at all levels, from policy
leaders (such as the HC/RC, UNCT or INGO country directors, Protection Cluster leads and,
where appropriate, government representatives) to field-based programming staff and people
of concern. However, it may be useful in the early stages for a designated working group to
take the lead in drafting a document that can be used as the basis for consensus-building around
priority objectives/activities. It is critical that this working group is multi-sectoral and includes
representatives from the GBV coordination mechanism, including government (where possible),
all of the relevant humanitarian clusters/sectors, people of concern, gender advisors/experts, etc.
(See IS 4.6 on creating coordination sub-groups.)
As indicated in the time line in IS 4.1, the action-planning process should begin immediately after
an initial assessment is conducted, and a preliminary plan would ideally be completed within the
first month of an emergency. However, because participation is key, consensus-building should be
prioritized over a specific time line. Some of the key steps in the action-planning process include
(but are not limited to):
Every Action Plan should be adapted to its setting, and in some cases it may be useful to develop
an over-arching Action Plan at the national level with sub-plans at the regional and/or local level
(see examples of GBV action plans from Kenya (Annex 50) and Uganda (Annex 51). However,
there are some common principles in creating Action Plans (see text box below) as well as some
basic elements that every Action Plan should strive to include. It is important for those drafting
an Action Plan to understand the standards for addressing GBV that are articulated in the multi-
sectoral and multi-level models presented in IS 1.2.
IS 4.4
1. Background Good to know
• Outlines relevant facts that have led to the existing
humanitarian crisis, including information about the There are several key principles
GBV situation prior to the emergency. related to creating effective
• Provides a current situational analysis related to GBV, Action Plans:
Monitoring is the tracking of priority information about a programme/project and its intended
outcomes and is therefore sometimes referred to as ‘process evaluation’. Monitoring activities
include:
►► Routine, regular tracking of information about the implementation of activities within the
GBV Action Plan and intended outputs, outcomes and impact.
►► Measurement of progress toward achieving objectives of the Action Plan. Most often this
involves quantifying what is being done, but it may also include observation, anecdotal
information and/or focus-group discussions and key informant interviews.
►► Tracking costs and funding for implementation of activities with the Action Plan.
When linked to a specific programme/project, monitoring provides the basis for programme/
project evaluation. Monitoring and evaluation must be integrated into the plan of action by
establishing indicators as well as systems for consistent review and analysis of the indicators.
Indicators are qualitative or quantitative criteria that provide a simple and reliable means
to measure achievement, to reflect the changes connected to an activity or to help assess the
performance of a cluster/sector. Standard indicators should be measurable and well-defined. In
the emergency phase, indicators may not reflect service utilization as much as they reflect whether
the services have been put in place. Sample indicators for clusters/sectors are available in the
IASC GBV Guidelines (p.28).
IS 4.4
An Action Plan articulates the rationale for and the activities linked to broad-based multi-sectoral
Drafting an inter-agency GBV Action Plan
programming and coordination. SOPs, on the other hand, are more specifically related to ensuring
targeted prevention activities as well as coordinated response mechanisms and referral pathways
for meeting the needs of survivors. In essence, the Action Plan describes an overall vision for
and activities related to GBV programming, while the SOPs provide operational guidance. SOP
development should be one of the key activities identified in an initial Action Plan.
Resources
Annexes
Coordination sub-groups are essentially working groups of individuals within the coordination
mechanism that are assigned specific tasks—many of which are related to the functions of a GBV
coordination mechanism that are described in Section three of this handbook. Coordination
sub-groups are a useful way of delegating responsibility to a relatively small corps of volunteers
(anywhere from four to 10 people) in order to increase efficiency of the coordination mechanism
by avoiding the time-consuming process of managing all activities in a large quorum. Sub-groups
also useful because they:
IS 4.5
Coordinator(s) or coordination mechanism chair/co-chair(s).
►► Build cohesion among members working together for a common goal in small groups.
►► Increase momentum of the coordination mechanism by allowing it to work simultaneously
on a number of different objectives.
After the group has worked successfully together to finalize a TOR (usually within the first three
weeks of implementing a coordination mechanism), the GBV Coordinator can begin to solicit
group interest in developing sub-groups for particular activities. If initial participation is slow, the
GBV Coordinator may set an example by volunteering to lead one or two of the first sub-groups.
As the coordination mechanism continues to solidify, all efforts should be made to encourage
Sub-groups conduct their work outside of coordination meetings and are therefore responsible
for organizing the time and frequency of their own meetings. However, in order to ensure
accountability to the entire coordination mechanism, each sub-group should develop an informal
action plan that they share with the larger group. Each sub-group should also have a timeline
for activities/outputs and should report on their progress at each coordination meeting. If the
sub-group is responsible for creating a ‘product’ (such as a poster for IEC), the product should be
reviewed and approved by all members of the coordination mechanism. A sub-group should never
complete an activity and/or product without the buy-in of the entire coordination mechanism.
If a coordination sub-group stalls on their particular activity, it may be useful for the GBV
Coordinator to step in and trouble-shoot any emerging problems, such as the lack of technical
or financial resources, or conflict/disagreement amongst group members (see IS 5.6 on conflict
resolution). In all instances, the GBV Coordinator should encourage and compliment the work of
the sub-groups by highlighting their successes at every coordination meeting.
IS 4.5
Creating coordination sub-groups
One of the most glaring concerns emerging from the GBV AoR’s 2008 global review of GBV
coordination mechanisms was the apparent lack of communication between the national
coordination mechanisms and the field-based coordination mechanisms and/or field-based actors.
According to the findings:
IS 4.6
mechanisms and field coordination positions at the different levels to further promote
mechanisms were not well-established effective coordination. A national GBV Coordinator
in several settings. was brought on board to UNFPA Kampala in
►► Field coordination mechanisms were November 2007. In addition, there is a regional
GBV Coordinator based in Gulu district, and four
Linking national and field-level coordination mechanisms is a top priority for all actors working
on GBV, as these coordination mechanisms often have different but mutually reinforcing
responsibilities: the national coordination mechanism may work on the ‘bigger picture’ (e.g.,
national-level advocacy, data collection and management, working with media, assisting other
clusters/sectors at the national level, etc.) and the field coordination mechanism may work more on
the level of operational guidance and oversight of programme implementation. When the national
and field-based coordination mechanisms do not coordinate, their respective responsibilities
are compromised. For example, the national coordination mechanism cannot adequately meet
its national-level advocacy responsibilities unless it understands what is happening at the field
level. Those working at the field level, in turn, cannot meet their responsibilities for providing
operational guidance unless they are speaking with the same voice as the national coordination
mechanism about guiding principles, best-practice models, etc.
How are the linkages between the national-level and field-level coordination
mechanisms established?
Getting started. Most often, GBV coordination in an emergency will be initiated at the national level.
One of the minimum responsibilities of the national GBV coordination mechanism, as articulated
in the GBV AoR Guidance Note (see Annex 7), is (where relevant) catalyzing and supporting
sub-national structures for GBV coordination. As with national coordination mechanisms, it
is always preferable at the sub-national level to build on pre-existing coordination structures,
Identifying membership. These sub-national structures should be comprised of the key actors
(health, psychosocial, security/protection) at the local levels, as well as people of concern, local GBV
and gender experts, etc. One of the activities while conducting a rapid assessment of GBV issues
and programmes in the affected geographic areas should involve identifying coordination groups
and/or coordination partners at the field level that can be mobilized to undertake emergency GBV
coordination. Where working with the government poses no security risks, it will be important
to determine how to build on government structures to promote sub-national GBV coordination.
In some settings, the Protection Cluster may field protection actors to work locally—these actors
may be particularly well-suited to promote the initial implementation of local GBV coordination
groups where no other options are pre-existing, and this possibility should be explored with the
Protection Cluster at the national level in settings where the clusters have been activated.
Identifying leadership. The IASC GBV Guidelines and the IASC template for Standard Operating
Procedures (see IS 3.6) provide specific guidance on establishing coordination mechanisms at
IS 4.6
the field level. They suggest that the national GBV coordinating agency(ies) might not be the
same organization(s) as the regional and local GBV coordinating agencies. It is not necessary,
and sometimes not appropriate, for the same agency to be in the coordinating role at all levels. In
some settings, it has proven effective to have different organizations in the coordinating roles at
Linking national and local coordination mechanisms
different geographic levels, and in all cases it is important to build on and support local structures
as is feasible. Determining leadership of the field-level coordination mechanisms should be done
by partners at the first meeting, in the same participatory manner as is done at the national level
(see IS 4.1). In order to support the sustainability of field-based coordination mechanisms, it may
be preferable to identify local rather than international partners as leads and ensure they have
sufficient technical and financial support to meet their responsibilities.
Sharing information. Information should be shared at least monthly (and in the early stages
of an emergency, even more often) among and between the national coordination mechanism
and the field-based coordination mechanisms through dissemination of meeting minutes. Other
strategies for communication, information-sharing, problem-solving and mutual support should
be identified in the TORs of the respective coordination mechanisms and periodically updated as
best practices and lessons learned emerge.
Developing communication channels. The following diagram illustrates how the local, regional
and national coordination mechanisms may relate to one another (arrows indicate communications
flow):
Camp/village/local GBV Working Groups
Another important element of this diagram is that regional working groups, where they exist,
should foster cross-communication amongst themselves. This may also happen amongst local
coordination groups, though for the reasons identified above in terms of limited communication
options over a wide geographic area, cross-communication at this level may prove more
challenging. To every extent possible, the regional and national coordination groups should
attempt to facilitate information- and resource-sharing across all local-level groups.
In some settings, such as where there are both IDPs and refugees, sub-national coordination
groups might form separately according to the populations they are serving. In these instances, it
is important that the national coordination body support and maintain strategies for information-
and resource-sharing as is appropriate to the goals and Action Plans of the different coordination
groups. The national coordination body may choose to do this by, for example, developing sub-
IS 4.6
groups at the national level to provide support to specific coordination groups at the sub-national
level (see IS 4.5 on creating coordination sub-groups).
Resources
Annexes
As described in the Introduction to this handbook, emergencies occur in phases. While this
handbook primarily focuses on the crisis stage—following the onset of an emergency—it highlights
work that can be undertaken in the pre-crisis stage (in terms of disaster risk reduction, contingency
planning for emergency preparedness and response, etc.). It is also important to anticipate and
prepare for work that should be done during the post-crisis (stabilization) and recovery phases.
One of the most critical issues for a GBV coordination mechanism to consider, especially after the
initial emergency response has waned, is how to ensure that coordination mechanisms for GBV
are continued after the cluster systems (or other humanitarian structures) have terminated—this
is what sustainability is all about.
Good practice
The GBV AoR’s 2008 global review of coordination mechanisms observed that in some settings where
there were no GBV coordination activities in place before the humanitarian crisis, the crisis itself
IS 4.7
Any real efforts to eradicate GBV require long-term strategies aimed at broad-based social change
targeting the discriminatory practices that promote and/or condone violence against women and
girls. GBV is a problem that does not end when the emergency phase ends, and in some instances,
shifting from the emergency to recovery and development phases can herald increased rates of
certain types of GBV, especially when emergency-related programming for the most vulnerable
is discontinued. In settings where women and girls have lost basic protective mechanisms as a
result of the emergency (such as family, livelihoods, etc.), their vulnerability is likely to increase
when they can no longer access the benefits of humanitarian aid and must struggle to reintegrate
into their communities.
In order to meet their ongoing needs, as well as to address the larger social issues that contribute
to GBV, anti-violence work should continue in all settings: there is no country or region in the
world where it is not important to combat GBV. And as this handbook highlights, that work must
be well-coordinated: developing programmes, improving systems, changing policy, conducting
advocacy, etc., all require the input of multi-sectoral actors working according to the same
principles and with the same understanding of the key strategic approaches to addressing GBV.
Ideally, a GBV coordination mechanism will be in place even before an emergency strikes, and
in this instance, it is best to merge the emergency coordination mechanism back into pre-existing
coordination structures (see IS 2.A.4 for a review of various options for linking emergency
coordination to pre-existing GBV coordination structures) that focus on recovery and development
work. This process should be relatively straightforward (and anticipated from the onset of the
emergency) and will hopefully contribute to an improvement in coordination efforts based on best
practices and lessons learned during the emergency phase.
Where GBV coordination is introduced during the emergency (i.e., there are no pre-existing
mechanisms), it is important that the lead coordination agencies anticipate some of the challenges
that may arise when transitioning the coordination body to a permanent structure, as described
below. Strategies for addressing these challenges should be developed as soon as possible during
the emergency phase.
IS 4.7
political or security problems, other Gender, Labor and Development, but engagement
local agencies should be identified. of other line ministries remains limited. Within the
With either option, it is often Ministry of Health, for example, the GBV Focal Point
the case that local actors will not is also the focal point for gender and therefore does
have the experience to coordinate not have the time or resources to focus on GBV or
►► Technical resources/tools: Many of the tools that are developed during an emergency
can and should be used for post-emergency work. These might include training curricula,
assessment tools, data collection systems, SOPs, etc. However, they will likely need to be
adapted, not only to address the shift in focus from sexual violence during an emergency
to broader GBV issues post-emergency, but also to accommodate the transition from
humanitarian actors to development actors. Strategizing during the emergency phase
about how to adapt existing resources and develop new tools will facilitate the eventual
transition to recovery and development.
IS 4.7
Ensuring sustainability of coordination mechanisms
Section 5:
5
Introduction
PRACTICAL coordination
SKILLS
107
Section Five: PRACTICAL
coordination SKILLS
Introduction
This section, possibly the most important of the handbook, reviews basic skills in leadership,
management and coordination. It aims to give the GBV Coordinator the tools necessary to maintain
the momentum and the commitment of those participating in a GBV coordination mechanism by
employing techniques aimed at promoting collaboration, mutual responsibility and consensus.
It is often the case in emergencies that the urgent need to get something done overwhelms
considerations of how to engage in a productive and participatory process that has long-term
benefits for all coordination partners, especially people of concern. And yet, in order for any
coordination to be effective and sustainable, the GBV Coordinator will need to be as mindful
of the methods for coordination as s/he is of outcome. Partners need to be encouraged to take
responsibility from the outset of the coordination process to develop their capacity to work
together over the long term.
At the same time, in some contexts so much time has been spent working on establishing
coordination systems (e.g., through lengthy inter-agency and multi-sectoral assessments and
situational analyses) that it has taken too long time to establish urgent services—despite the fact
5
that providing urgent services is the goal of good coordination. GBV Coordinators must find
ways to balance their dual responsibilities: ensuring immediate services are implemented and
building mechanisms to coordinate those services. Hopefully, some of the techniques outlined in
Introduction
this section will increase efficiency and effectiveness.
The skills outlined here will also be useful to those who need to work with a wide array of cluster/
sector actors, members of the community, gender advisors and others engaged in humanitarian
action. To this end, information from this section can be shared with GBV partners in order to
build the competencies required to emphasize the importance of GBV prevention and response to
key stakeholders.
With permission from the authors, the seven information sheets from this section have been
adapted from the Child Protection Coordinators’ Handbook 2009 for Clusters, available at: http://
oneresponse.info/GlobalClusters/Protection/CP/Pages/Child%20Protection.aspx
Critical to know
“Leadership is earned, it is not about declaring yourself or your agency in charge due to some global
mandate. It is about listening and learning and observing and supporting. It is about treating others
with as much respect as you’d wish them to treat you. Leadership in the context of GBV coordination
means offering technical input and information and supporting group-generated action.” -From GBV
Coordination Course Curriculum, UNFPA and Ghent University, 2010
Collaborative leadership is a process through which individuals and organizations are encouraged
to:
Given the multi-sectoral nature of GBV programming, any GBV coordination efforts—whether
through the cluster system or not—must engage a wide variety of actors with different agendas
Fostering collaborative leadership
and priorities. All of these actors, in addition to being committed to fulfilling their particular GBV-
related responsibilities, must also be committed to working with others to ensure that the whole is
greater than the sum of its parts.
Those responsible for facilitating collaboration must work to create an enabling environment for
participation, problem-solving and decision-making, so that participants share responsibility and
feel ownership of collective outcomes. This often requires a mental and practical shift from more
typical (and sometimes easier) authoritative leadership methods to more collaborative leadership
methods:
From... ...To
• Leading based on line authority • Leading based on trust, relationships,
• Unilateral decision-making services
• Command and control • Shared decision-making and consensus
• Implementing partners management
• Focus on agency interest • Facilitate, network and enable
• Being at the forefront • Equal partners
• Focus on broader sector and emergency as
a whole
• Facilitating and networking ‘behind-the-
scenes’
Cultivate a shared vision and identity right from the start. Make sure, for example, that
1 all actors agree on the Terms of Reference for the GBV coordination mechanism in the
earliest stages of the coordination process.
Take care to involve the right mix of stakeholders and decision-makers. This can often be
challenging in GBV coordination, especially in settings where GBV is a politically charged
2 issue. (See IS 4.2 for recommendations on building membership of the GBV coordination
mechanism.)
Sustain the momentum and focus on ongoing collaboration. A reliable and regular flow
3 of accurate information to all coordination partners and periodic review of coordination
action plans and outcomes will help to achieve this.
Engage the perspectives and address the needs of each stakeholder group in the work of
4 the GBV coordination mechanism. Be sure to sensitively (i.e., non-aggressively) draw out
those whose contributions are critical but who may be overshadowed by stronger voices.
Ensure that both the process and products of the collaboration, to the greatest extent
5 possible, serve each participant agency’s self-interests. Recognize that in order for
participants to value collaboration, they must see some benefit for themselves!
Don’t waste time. Meetings must be efficient and productive; management must be lean
6 and driven. (See IS 5.3 for more information about managing meetings.)
Develop clear roles and responsibilities for GBV coordination participants (even if these
IS 5.1
7 roles and responsibilities regularly shift). This can often be facilitated by developing sub-
groups within the coordination mechanism, as described in IS 4.6.
Secure commitments from all participants that every effort will be made to ensure that the
same people come to each meeting. One way to indirectly reinforce this is to make sure
8
Experience has shown that different situations require different leadership styles. A collaborative
leader assesses the situation and chooses an appropriate leadership style.
1
Adapted from Hank Rubin, http://www.collaborative-leaders.org/, as presented in the Child Protection Coordinators’
Handbook 2009 for Clusters, at: http://oneresponse.info/GlobalClusters/Protection/CP/Pages/Child%20Protection.aspx
A coordination body’s ability to perform increases over time as it goes through stages. In an
emergency, those stages are likely to change rapidly and often overlap. In order to maximize the
performance of the GBV coordination mechanism, it is important to recognize and manage the
developmental phases of a group.2
Fostering collaborative leadership
Behaviour What are we here Of rules, Information and Effective team, high
to do? What are procedures, ideas begin to performance of
our goals? structures, roles, be received and appropriate tasks
etc. shared
GBV Establish roles, Clarify roles, Facilitate Use a delegative style
Coordinator’s responsibilities responsibilities, discussions, use of leadership, monitor
actions and purpose of procedures, participative progress, provide
the coordination systems; explain leadership, coach feedback
mechanism; limits; facilitate others
encourage getting conflict resolution
to know each
other
2
Taken from Child Protection Coordinators’ Handbook, 2009 and adapted from ‘WASH Cluster Coordinators
Handbook” (Draft 12 October); Blake R.R. and J.S. Mouton: The Managerial Grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing Co., 1964;
Tuckman B.W. Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin, 1965.
IS 5.1
Fostering collaborative leadership
Many of the positive outcomes of GBV coordination efforts can be linked to the communication
skills of the coordination leaders—whether in leading meetings, conducting advocacy, meeting
with stakeholders, etc. It is therefore absolutely critical that coordinators are aware of their
strengths and weaknesses related to communication. In the race against time during emergencies,
coordinators often overlook the importance of communication. Familiarize yourself with the
recommendations below—and use them.
• Use paraphrase to check what you think you have heard. Ask ‘So, just to be clear, are you
saying...?’
• Show you are listening by responding to what is being said, without interrupting.
• Do not answer on someone else’s behalf or finish what is being said. Do not show
impatience.
Effective communication
In addition to these basic communication skills that GBV Coordinators should apply in all their
efforts to work with partners, there will be many situations in which GBV partners themselves will
have to use strategic communication skills in order to promote the goals and objectives related to
ethical, safe and comprehensive GBV prevention and response programming.
A key element of strategic communication is seeing an issue from the perspective of the audience.
It is important to get to know key stakeholders and identify ‘GBV allies’. GBV partners must also
think about what will motivate their target audiences to meet their GBV-related responsibilities
and be prepared with persuasive messages. Persuasive techniques:
IS 5.2
get across.
Effective communication
well-informed? Are they likely to be receptive or hostile to the
Audience information that you are communicating?
• Consider the timing of your message. People in an emergency are
unlikely to take in much information unless the message is directly
relevant to their job.
Resources
CEDPA Training Manual Series, “Gender, Reproductive Health, and Advocacy” (Washington,
DC, 2000) Sessions 9-14.
http://www.cedpa.org/section/publications?topic=37
What are the essential considerations when planning and conducting a GBV
coordination meeting?
During an emergency, humanitarian actors often complain about the number of meetings they
have to attend. It is therefore critical that those participating in GBV coordination meetings
understand and appreciate the importance of their attendance. Not only should they feel they are
integral to the process, they should enjoy it.
The following checklist can assist facilitators to ensure that GBV meetings are organized, efficient
and inclusive.
►► Identify a venue for the meeting that is accessible to all participants—not just those
W working for the UN!
H ►► Try and establish consensus about the acceptability of the venue early on; avoid
changing venues to the greatest extent possible.
E ►► Ensure the venue has the necessary space, equipment, ventilation, catering, etc., and is
IS 5.3
W ►► Identify a regular day/time for the meeting that maximizes participation—and stick
H to it!
►► Plan to hold meetings at least once a week in the early stages of the emergency, then
E consider changing to once every two weeks when the situation has stabilized, and once
N a month when the situation is shifting to recovery.
►► If the Internet is widely available, create an e-mail list of all prospective meeting
W participants to alert them each week about the meetings and to provide them with
H an agenda. Identify other methods (telephone, hand-written reminders) for alerting
partners about meeting time/agenda if the Internet is not available. Distribute a sign-
O up list at each meeting to regularly update e-mail and other contact information.
►► Allow time for preparation of the meeting content so that all necessary resources are
H meeting.
►► Provide tea, coffee and biscuits for participants during the meeting. If time permits,
O allow for a coffee break during the meeting to facilitate networking.
W ►► Take decisions during the meeting in order to promote an action-oriented approach.
• Make sure that decisions are within the authority of those present.
• Accurately record decisions and action points in the meeting minutes.
• Communicate decisions to others (not attending the meeting) who need to know.
►► Allow time at the end of the meeting to evaluate whether the goals of the meeting have
been achieved and to review key action points.
►► Circulate the minutes no more than three days after the meeting, making sure to
highlight action points.
When you run a meeting you are making demands on people’s time and attention – you need to
use time wisely and consider alternatives where possible. Do not call a meeting if there is a better
way to exchange information – identify the purpose the information exchange, consider issues
IS 5.3
related to that purpose and, wherever possible, utilize alternatives.
Managing meetings
• Providing • Is the information easily • Written memos / reports
information presented and understood • E-mail messages / fax
• Receiving without interaction? • Phone calls
information • Who needs to participate • Instant messaging
• Problem- in the decision or • Teleconferencing
solving discussion? • One-to-one exchange
• Decision- • Who needs to be • Online options (e.g.,
making committed to the googlegroups, websites)
outcome? • Video
Facilitating a GBV coordination meeting is likely to be one of the biggest challenges facing a GBV
Coordinator—s/he will need to balance the need to be seen as impartial, independent and a
good listener at the same time as achieving the tasks associated with GBV coordination. The GBV
Coordinator’s role is to facilitate meetings in such a way that the collective wisdom of the attendees
is tapped into, while keeping discussions in line with the meeting’s agenda. It is important to
create an environment where participants understand and meet their responsibilities to prepare
for and engage constructively in meetings. The suggestions below are meant to complement those
on effective communication identified in IS 5.2.
Facilitates
• Begins the meeting with introductions, icebreakers, etc.
• Makes suggestions on how the meeting can move forward.
• Encourages ideas from others.
• Looks for connections between participants’ ideas.
• Limits his/her own opinions and ideas to remain neutral.
Clarifies
• Asks open-ended questions.
• Restates an idea or thought when it needs to be clarified.
• Ensures others have understood.
• Limits overly detailed explanations from others, keeps discussion focused.
Summarizes
• Condenses key points in the discussion, agreements, action points, etc.
• Arranges for a volunteer to record salient points as they arise—perhaps on a flipchart
or other visual. This helps the group stay focused, avoids repetition and helps build
consensus.
IS 5.3
Manages participants
• Creates opportunities for everyone to participate and feel they are listened to and their
contributions valued.
• Asks for information and opinions, especially from smaller NGOs and donors.
Managing meetings
Resources
IS 5.4
When is consensus-building most When should consensus-building
useful? be avoided?
Consensus-building
and information valuable to the the solutions are either highly
decision-making, prioritization technical or clearly obvious and/
and planning process. or options are severely limited.
►► Buy-in is necessary for ►► Interagency standards and
commitment, ownership of objectives are being compromised
decisions and follow-through. or threatened by the same
►► The way forward is in doubt and/ consensus.
or solutions are ambiguous. ►► Another decision-making process
►► Solutions require interdependent is more efficient and effective.
actions by stakeholders. ►► Stakeholders are highly
►► Power, information and politicized or views highly
implementation is fragmented polarized.
among many stakeholders. ►► Decision-makers are not at the
►► Stakeholders hold conflicting table.
views yet unity on major ►► There is insufficient information.
decisions is required to uphold ►► There is insufficient time for a
standards and accountability. full exploration of all views and
►► Good relationship among consensus to be reached.
stakeholders is needed in the
future.
►► The group is relatively small
(up to 20) and has mutual
understanding.
1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, A Short Guide to Consensus Building. Available at
http://web.mit.edu/publicdisputes/practice/cbh_ch1.html
Adjust, compromise and fine-tune the agreed upon idea/solution so all group
5 members can accept the result.
Testing for agreement: Notice when the group is nearing agreement and can move on to a
IS 5.4
firm decision. Groups can waste a lot of time talking around ideas that they largely agree
on. It is worth presenting the group with the ideas you are hearing and asking for some
sign of agreement or disagreement. Some disagreement may still allow the group to move
forward. For example: Non-support: ‘I don’t see the need for this but I’ll go along with it’.
Standing aside: ‘I personally can’t do this, but I won’t stop others from doing it’.
Consensus-building
Make your decision. If a consensus is not reached, review and/or repeat steps one
6 through six (see below for tips on dealing with an impasse).
Breaking an impasse:
• Remind all actors of the humanitarian consequences of failing to reach an
agreement, how an agreement will benefit the GBV survivors you are all there to
serve (reference obligations as duty-bearers).
• Confer and invite suggestions – use probing questions.
• Retrace progress and summarize areas of agreement and disagreement.
• Find out where people stand/how strongly they feel.
• Gather further information or ‘evidence’ to facilitate decision-making.
• Build consensus in mixed small groups, then meet all actors together.
• Set a time limit for establishing consensus – and then suggest that the issue goes to
a majority vote.
• Meet individually with primary disputants and ask them ‘What could be changed
so that you could support it?’.
• In the most difficult situations, bring disputing parties together at a separate time
in order to facilitate conflict resolution and problem-solving.
7 Once the decision has been made, act upon what you have decided.
Resources
IS 5.4
Consensus-building
Negotiation is a complex process but one worth mastering. Whatever the level of negotiation, the
following guidelines are useful:
Negotiation in GBV coordination
The other person needs to know what you need. It is important to state not only what
you need, but also why you need it. Often disagreement may exist regarding the method
for solving an issue, but not about the overall goal. Start with what you ideally want, but
indicate you are prepared to make some concessions.
Negotiating is about finding solutions. Do not waste time arguing. If you disagree with
something, state your disagreement in a gentle but assertive way and offer an alternative.
Do not demean the other person or enter into a power struggle.
Consider timing.
There are good and bad times to negotiate. Bad times include
those situations where there is:
Resources
IS 5.5
http://www.colorado.edu/conflict/peace/treatment/negotn.htm
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, A Short Guide to Consensus Building. Available at
http://web.mit.edu/publicdisputes/practice/cbh_ch1.html
A53: Susie Michelle Cortright, “10 Tips to Effective and Active Listening.”
Conflicts are a pervasive and inevitable part of any group and, if handled well, can lead to growth
and development of the GBV coordination mechanism as well as of each individual partner.
styles of working).
Good to know
Conflict resolution
Conflicts—and the negotiations around them—can often lead to more effective and sustainable
solutions because they draw in a much wider range of views and possible solutions. Conflicts are
not to be avoided! The following skills can assist in handling conflicts constructively.
1. Recognize symptoms
• Overt symptoms include: anger, disengagement, silence, body language, formation
of cliques and arguments.
• Hidden symptoms include: low energy, non-attendance, arriving late/leaving early,
mistakes, not socializing.
4. Focus on the core issue or problem: avoid ‘old scores’ or ‘getting personal’.
6. Invite suggestions on the way forward: focus on solutions and building consensus
(see IS 5.4).
7. Check agreement of all stakeholders and that everyone accepts the resolution.
An impasse occurs when key stakeholders are unable to perceive effective solutions to their dispute
or differences. People feel stuck, frustrated, angry and disillusioned. They might dig their heels
in deeper, adopt extreme or rigid positions, or they might withdraw from participating in GBV
coordination. Either way, an impasse represents a turning point in efforts to negotiate a solution
to the conflict—it is usually a forerunner to actually resolving a conflict. Strategies for managing
an impasse are similar to those listed above as well as those identified in consensus-building—but
they may require a bit more time and patience. They include1:
IS 5.6
►► Trying active-listening variations.
►► Respecting silence.
►► Talking about feelings.
►► Caucusing or gathering together in small groups.
Conflict resolution
Resources
1
Harry Webne-Behrman, The practice of facilitation: managing group process and solving problems. UK: Praeger
Publishers (1998), pp. 35-36.
Action Plan, etc. A mechanism for monitoring partners’ success in meeting their responsibilities
is also necessary.
First, the GBV Coordinator’s responsibilities should be clearly outlined in the TOR of the
coordination mechanism, and every effort should be made to ensure that these responsibilities are
met. The best way to encourage accountability is to lead by example.
►► The GBV coordination Action Plan designates agencies, individuals or small groups for
specific tasks.
►► TOR for the Chair(s) are drafted at the outset.
►► Meetings are efficient and action-oriented.
►► Action points are included in meeting minutes.
►► There is a process through which agencies, individuals and small group commitments (as
recorded in the minutes) are routinely reviewed.
►► Attending participants have the authority to make decisions on behalf of their designated
organizations.
►► The GBV Coordinator continuously acknowledges and applauds the work of partner
organizations that are meeting their responsibilities.
Resources
IASC, ‘Guidance Note on Using the Cluster Approach to Strengthen Humanitarian Response’ (2006).
http://oneresponse.info/Pages/default.aspx
1
Overseas Development Institute (ODI), Briefing Paper, “Promoting Mutual Accountability in Aid Relationships,” April
(2006), p.1.
Section 6:
Annexes 6 Annex
A1
(less in exceptional cases). Extensions can be
GenCap consists of a pool of 35 gender advisers made up to a maximum of 24 months altogether. If
at a P-4/ P-5 level to be deployed on short notice an office needs a more permanent gender adviser
as an interagency resource to support the UN
GenCap FAQs
presence it should go through its regular recruitment
Humanitarian/Resident Coordinators (HC/RC), procedures.
humanitarian country teams and cluster/sectors
leads, in the initial stages of sudden-onset How does GenCap differ from
emergencies as well as in protracted or recurring
humanitarian situations. ProCap?
The Protection Standby Capacity Project (ProCap)
The Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) is is a roster of protection officers and GenCap
administering the expert pool. GenCap Advisers’ is copying many of ProCap’s structures. While
salary, DSA/hazard pay, insurance and flights are protection issues such as GBV is a part of the
covered by the GenCap project. GenCap Advisers’ ToR they have a broader role
in facilitating gender equality programming in all
sectors/clusters of humanitarian response.
A2
1979 Convention on Established an agenda of action for putting an end to sex-based discrimination, which led to the
the Elimination creation of the international bill of rights for women. “States ratifying the Convention are required to
of all Forms of enshrine gender equality into their domestic legislation, repeal all discriminatory provisions in their
Discrimination laws, and enact new provisions to guard against discrimination against women.”
UN Security SCR 1612 implements a monitoring and reporting mechanism (to the Special Representative
A2
Council Resolution of the Secretary-General) on children and armed conflict and the use of child soldiers, including
1612 on Children monitoring and reporting sexual violence.
and Armed Conflict
2006 UN Security Condemns in the strongest terms all sexual and other forms of violence committed against civilians
International Legal Framework
Council Resolution in armed conflict, in particular women and children, and undertakes to ensure that all peace-
1674 on Protection support operations employ all feasible measures to prevent such violence and to address its
of Civilians impact where it takes place.
2008 UN Security Condemns the use of rape and other forms of sexual violence in conflict situations, stating that
Council Resolution rape can constitute a war crime, a crime against humanity or a constitutive act with respect
1820 on Women, to genocide. Resolution 1820 also calls for effective steps to prevent and respond to acts of
Peace and Security sexual violence as a way of contributing to the maintenance of international peace and security –
including urging Member States to comply with their obligations to prosecute the perpetrators of
sexual violence, to ensure that all victims of sexual violence, particularly women and girls, have
equal protection under the law and equal access to justice, and to end impunity for sexual violence
as part of a comprehensive approach to seeking sustainable peace, justice, truth and national
reconciliation.
2009 UN Security Resolution 1882 is a follow-up to and reinforcement of Security Council Resolution 1612 (2005),
Council Resolution condemning the use of children in armed conflict, and asking member states to respect resolutions
1882 on Women, against the use of children in armed conflict. It also highlights the issue of rape and sexual
Peace and Security violence and calls upon states to halt such violations and strengthens the monitoring and reporting
mechanisms established in Resolution 1612 in relation to sexual violence.
UN Security Resolution 1888 reaffirms Resolution 1325 (2000) on Women and Peace and Security and
Council Resolution condemns ongoing sexual violence against women in conflict and post-conflict situations, urging
1888 on the Role of Member States, United Nations bodies, donors and civil society to ensure that women’s protection
Peacekeepers and empowerment is taken into account during post-conflict needs assessment and planning and
factored into subsequent funding and programming.
UN Security Resolution 1889 mandates peacekeeping missions to protect women and girls from sexual
Council Resolution violence in armed conflict.
1889 on Women,
Peace and Security
1
Information adapted from Bossman, M, Material for training course: Coordination of Multi-Sectoral Response to Gender-Based
Violence in Humanitarian Settings, Ghent University, November 2008.
132 Section Six: Annexes
Principles of Partnership
A Statement of Commitment
The Global Humanitarian Platform, created in July 2006, brings together UN and non-UN
humanitarian organizations on an equal footing.
… the organizations participating in the Global Humanitarian Platform agree to base their
partnership on the following principles:
• Equality
A3
Equality requires mutual respect between members of the partnership irrespective of size and power.
The participants must respect each other’s mandates, obligations and independence and recognize each
other’s constraints and commitments. Mutual respect must not preclude organizations from engaging
in constructive dissent.
• Result-oriented approach
Effective humanitarian action must be reality-based and action-oriented. This requires result-oriented
coordination based on effective capabilities and concrete operational capacities.
• Responsibility
Humanitarian organizations have an ethical obligation to each other to accomplish their tasks
responsibly, with integrity and in a relevant and appropriate way. They must make sure they commit
to activities only when they have the means, competencies, skills, and capacity to deliver on their
commitments. Decisive and robust prevention of abuses committed by humanitarians must also be a
constant effort.
• Complementarity
The diversity of the humanitarian community is an asset if we build on our comparative advantages
and complement each other’s contributions. Local capacity is one of the main assets to enhance and
on which to build. Whenever possible, humanitarian organizations should strive to make it an integral
part in emergency response. Language and cultural barriers must be overcome.
www.globalhumanitarianplatform.org
The aim of the cluster and cluster leadership approach is to strengthen system-wide preparedness and technical capacity to
respond to humanitarian emergencies by ensuring that there is a high standard of predictability, accountability and partnership
in all sectors, including protection.
UNHCR is the global lead agency for the Protection Cluster, however, at the country level in natural disaster situations or in
complex emergencies without significant displacement, the three protection-mandated agencies (UNHCR, UNICEF and OHCHR)
have committed to consult closely and, under the overall leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator/Resident Coordinator,
agree which among them would assume the role of cluster lead for protection.
Once protection cluster leadership is assumed at the country level, the Protection Cluster Lead Agency is responsible for
ensuring a well coordinated and effective response in the protection area of activity covering the identified needs of persons of
concern. This does not mean that the cluster lead agency is expected to carry out all the necessary activities within protection,
but that it is committed to being provider of last resort, which entails, inter alia, advocating for full coverage if this is not possible
immediately. Accordingly, a Protection Cluster Lead Agency can not purport to be only responsible for a specialist segment of
the protection area of activity as this will result in a partial activation of the Protection Cluster.
A4
The Global Protection Cluster has five (5) Areas of Responsibility (AOR) which are led by Focal Point Agencies: Rule of Law and
Justice (UNDP/OHCHR); Prevention of and Response to Gender-Based Violence (UNFPA/UNICEF); Child Protection (UNICEF);
Mine Action (UNMAS); and Housing, Land and Property Rights (UN HABITAT). To facilitate its work the Global Protection Cluster
PCWG Info Note
has established a Global Protection Cluster Working Group (GPC) which has a Support Cell to undertake secretariat and liaison
functions, and acts as the main point of contact for information, advice and support from the Global Protection Cluster to Field
Protection Clusters.
The Focal Point Agencies for the five (5) Areas of Responsibility can also provide information, advice and support from the
Global Protection Cluster within their Areas of Responsibility.
• Channelling requests to access available support on protection information management and database tools
(including advice/support on undertaking needs assessment and protection monitoring and reporting);
• Information on the possibility for making a request for the deployment of an information management and database
expert;
• Information on the possibility for making a request for the deployment of a technical expert to assist with the
assessment of the protection needs of older persons, persons with disabilities and other persons with special needs;
• Information on the possibility for the deployment of a Senior Protection Officer through the Protection Standby
Capacity Project;
• Information on the possibility for the deployment of surge protection capacity or a Senior Gender Advisor;
• Ad hoc advocacy requests for cluster related protection coordination issues to be brought up at the HQs level can also
be received and channelled to the relevant colleagues for action;
• Ad hoc requests for advice on protection and protection coordination challenges that you think should be brought to
the attention of the Global Protection Cluster;
• You may also make requests to the Global Protection Cluster to put you in contact with Focal Point Agencies responsible
for any one of the five Areas of Responsibility mentioned above.
A4
[email protected] [email protected]
However, you may also get in direct contact with the Focal Point Agencies on issues related to their Areas of Responsibility
• Inter-Agency Standing Committee Principals Meeting, Cluster Working Group on Protection Progress Report, 12
December 2005, Annex 2: Responsibility-Sharing for the enhancement of protection in humanitarian emergencies
• IASC, Guidance Note on Using the Cluster Approach to Strengthen Humanitarian Response, 24 November 2006
• Generic Terms of Reference for Sector/Cluster Leads at the Country Level, IASC, Annex 1 to the November 2006
Gudiance Note
• Protection Cluster Working Group, Mission Statement and Terms of Reference, 21 March 2007
• IASC Operational Guidance on Designating Sector/Cluster Leads in Major New Emergencies. Prepared by the IASC Task
Team on the Cluster Approach Geneva, 23 May 2007
• IASC Operational Guidance on Designating Sector/Cluster Leads in Ongoing Emergencies. Prepared by the IASC Task
Team on the Cluster Approach, Geneva 23 May 2007
A4
• IASC Operational Guidance on the Responsibilities of Cluster/Sector Leads and OCHA in Information Management,
Endorsed by the IASC Working Group, 17 October 2007
PCWG Info Note
• IASC Operational Guidance for Cluster Lead Agencies on Working with National Authorities (forthcoming)
• IASC Generic Terms of Reference for Sector/Cluster Leads at the country level, November 2006
• Protection in Natural Disasters: Standard Operating Procedures for Designating A Protection Sector/Cluster Lead
Agency in the Event of a Natural Disaster at Country Level (forthcoming)
• Principles of Partnership
• Questions and Answers on the Cluster Approach and Cluster Implementation Issues
Additional information on the Global Protection Cluster and the support it can provide to Field Protection Cluster is contained
in the Protection Cluster Information Brochure /Pamphlet: “Working Together for Protection” (forthcoming).
Concept Component
Life, physical security and Attacks, combats, bombings
integrity Killing of civilians
Destruction of civilian infrastructure
Use of civilians as human shields
Other forms of forced assistance to combatants or arm bearers
Landmines, UXO
Extra-judicial,arbitrary or summary executions or other unlawful killing
Enforced or involuntary disappearance
Threats or intimidations to life
Torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment
Criminal violence, banditry
Intercommunal violence
Sexual and gender-based violence
Treatment of the dead
A5
Other safety and security issues, including risks from natural disasters
Displacement and freedom of Forced displacement
movement Coerced return or relocation of displaced persons
Restrictions and other obstacles to freedom of movement, including as
TERMS OF REFERENCE
BACKGROUND
The Protection Cluster Working Group (PCWG) was established in September 2005 as an element of humanitarian
reform, with the objective of providing predictable leadership and accountable response to protection in humanitarian
settings. The PCWG, led by UNHCR at the global level, is accountable to the Emergency Relief Coordinator.
To ensure comprehensive attention to the range of violations, risks, and specialized activities which comprise
protection work in the field, the PCWG agreed that strengthening of protection coordination, policy, capacity, and
response at the global level would benefit from being divided into specific “areas of responsibility” under the cluster
lead.1 These were designated to build on pre-existing inter-agency coordination and policy work in specific technical
areas. Focal point agencies were designated for recognized areas of protection expertise and tasked with ensuring
an effective response in its specialized protection sector in collaboration with other participating agencies, functioning
in many ways as “clusters in miniature” at global level. UNFPA and UNICEF were designated as co-leads of the
Gender-Based Violence area of responsibility (GBV AoR).2
MISSION STATEMENT
A6
In line with the mission of the PCWG, the GBV AoR working group aims to facilitate a more predictable, accountable
and effective protection response to gender-based violence in complex emergencies, natural disasters and other
such situations. Gender-based violence is understood to encompass a range of harmful acts which are based on
socially-ascribed gender differences, with the recognition that sexual violence and targeted killing or maiming, are
GBV Area of Responsibility Terms of Reference
the most urgent considerations in rapid-onset emergencies, and continue, along with domestic violence, in protracted
emergencies3.
To this end, and accountable to the Protection Cluster lead, the GBV AoR working group will undertake global level
advocacy, standards and policy setting, capacity building and tool development on protection from GBV.
OVERALL OBJECTIVE
The overall objective of the GBV AoR working group is to develop effective and inclusive protection mechanisms
which promote a coherent, comprehensive and coordinated approach to GBV at the field level, including regarding
prevention, care, support, recovery, and works to hold perpetrators accountable. These actions will be in line with the
IASC Guidelines for Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Settings4 and undertaken in accordance
with international humanitarian law and human rights law, and be informed by regional or national legal frameworks
in specific country support actions.
The GBV AoR working group will undertake its activities within a framework which promotes action based on gender
analysis, participation, transparency, partnership, and survivor-centered principles.
PARTICIPATION
Recognizing that a number of inter-agency multi-sectoral coordination mechanisms on GBV actions, policy and
advocacy exist, particularly within the IASC SWG on Gender and Humanitarian Action and UN Action Against
Violence in Conflict, and that a coherent GBV protection response requires multi-sectoral linkages, the GBV AoR
working group will ensure strategic linkages with these other mechanisms. The GBV AoR working group will seek
broad and diverse participation from NGOs, UN agencies, and other international organizations working on GBV
issues from a protection perspective. It will actively solicit participation from other cluster actors and will ensure
appropriate representation of GBV AoR working group members in these clusters to ensure complementarities and
the development of integrated approaches to protection from GBV in emergencies. The GBV AoR working group will
feed protection perspectives into the work of the multisectoral group working within the IASC SWG to develop overall
norms and standards for operationalizing the IASC-GBV Guidelines.
1
Progress Report of the Cluster Working Group on Protection to the IASC Principals Meeting, 12 December 2005.
2
Id.
3
Guidelines for Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Settings, IASC, 2005. The guidelines are available at
http://www.humanitarianinfo.org/iasc/content/subsidi/tf_gender/gbv.asp
4
Id.
138 Section Six: Annexes
COORDINATION AND REPORTING
The GBV AoR working group will be co-chaired on an annual rotation basis, with UNFPA and UNICEF alternating as
one of the co-chairs, and an NGO (to be determined annually by the working group) alternating as the other co-chair
with support from the PCWG support cell and an active inter-agency membership. Minutes of meetings will be shared
with members as well as the PCWG.
Annual planning meetings will be held to exchange field-level experiences, review learning in protection programming
and advocacy work, and develop annual inter-agency GBV protection work plans. Coordination and reporting
mechanisms will focus on tracking results and informing both the PCWG and the GBV AoR working group on periodic
progress made on work plan activities.
Specific mechanisms will be developed to ensure close collaboration with UN Action against Sexual Violence in
Conflict, the IASC Sub-Working Group on Gender and Humanitarian Action, and other relevant pre-existing groups.
• Promote the IASC GBV Guidelines and accompanying tools, such as the GBV Standard Operating Procedures
as standard good practices for addressing GBV in humanitarian settings.
• Develop and/or elaborate norms, standards and tools for GBV protection.
• Build capacities within the protection sector to respond to and prevent sexual violence during acute
A6
emergencies, recognizing that other forms of GBV will also occur and that GBV protection considerations
must be addressed during response, rehabilitation and recovery.5 Collate, rationalize and disseminate inter-
agency training and staffing standards, guidelines and tools in support of more effective field programming.
• In collaboration with the PCWG, ensure that GBV is mainstreamed within the global protection agenda and
strategy, particularly with linkages to other protection AORs, including on the rule of law and child protection.
• Support the utilization, and, as needed, development of information management and analysis tools for
safe and ethical documentation of GBV, such as the GBV Information Management System project being
developed under the auspices of the IASC SWG on Gender and Humanitarian Action.
• Ensure integration of protection considerations into and clear linkages, mapping of complementarities, and
consultations in strategic planning with the IASC SWG on Gender and Humanitarian Action and UN Action
against Sexual Violence in Conflict.
• Build capacity on norms, standards and tools for GBV protection to enable field level protection actors to
operationalize the action sheets on protection in the IASC-GBV Guidelines.
• Support use of the IASC-GBV Guidelines to coordinate comprehensive GBV prevention and response
interventions in cluster countries.
• Support protection sector/cluster participation in GBV Standard Operating Procedures process to ensure
effective and coordinated GBV interventions.
• Support the establishment of inclusive and rational cross-cluster/multi-sectoral GBV coordination mechanisms
in all cluster countries (structure to depend on the country context ).
• In line with the WHO Ethical and Safety Recommendations for Researching, Documenting and Monitoring
5
Id.
Section Six: Annexes 139
Sexual Violence in Emergencies, support use of standardized systems for collection, analysis, sharing and
management of GBV-related data in a safe and ethical way. 6
• Receive and respond to requests from the field and the PCWG for provision of guidance on protection
aspects of a comprehensive GBV approach (in line with the IASC-GBV Guidelines and GBV SOPs), including
short-term, inter-agency technical support missions to the field as necessary.
• Expand a community of practice by maintaining a web-portal on GBV on the website of the PCWG and
encourage active field-exchange, including annual meetings.
WORK PLAN
To assist in building an effective and comprehensive protection response, the GBV AoR working group will develop
and implement an annual work plan which will be incorporated into the overall PCWG work plan. The work plan
will include a set of prioritized activities together with outputs, specific timeframes and responsible organizations.
In addition to specific GBV activities, contributions to overall PCWG outputs and activities will also be identified
according to field and membership priorities.
___________________________________
A6
GBV Area of Responsibility Terms of Reference
6
WHO Ethical and Safety Recommendations for Researching, Documenting and Monitoring Sexual Violence in Emergencies,
WHO, 2007. Available at http://www.who.int/gender/documents/OMS_Ethics&Safety10Aug07.pdf
140 Section Six: Annexes
Gender-Based Violence Area of Responsibility Working Group
1 September 2009
Dear Colleagues:
As you may know, the GBV AoR Working Group of the Global Protection Cluster was established in
May 2008 under the co‐leadership of UNFPA and UNICEF. The aim of the GBV AoR Working Group
is to facilitate a more predictable, accountable and effective protection response to GBV in complex
emergencies, natural disasters and other such situations. The overall objective of the GBV AoR
Working Group is to develop effective and inclusive protection mechanisms which promote a coherent,
comprehensive and coordinated approach to GBV at the field level.
As initially highlighted through a study to document GBV Coordination structures and identify constraints
and facilitating factors to “good coordination” spearheaded by the GBV AoR Working Group in
2008, field guidance on establishing and leading a GBV AoR, sub‐cluster, or other GBV coordinating
body is a priority need. This need was further confirmed by headquarter and field‐based GBV
A7
actors during the first annual GBV AoR planning retreat in Geneva, Switzerland in January 2009.
To that end, the 2009/2010 GBV AoR workplan prioritized the following activity:
The GBV AoR Co‐Lead/Co‐Chair Roles and Responsibilities document was developed (see Annex
1) that provides generic guidance on the global and field‐level responsibilities of the AoR co‐
leads and co‐chairs.
This document seeks to further articulate what GBV AoR leadership means at the field level, in countries
that have already adopted (or are intending to adopt) the cluster approach. A more detailed “GBV
Coordinator’s Handbook” is also in development by the GBV AoR, which will go into greater depth on
each of the core issues outlined in this Guidance Note.
Kind Regards,
GUIDANCE NOTE
Field‐Level Coordination of a GBV Area of Responsibility Working Group
Table of Contents
Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ 2
Objective of the Guidance Note ..................................................................................................... 3
Global Co‐Leadership of the GBV AoR ............................................................................................ 3
Determining Field Leadership ......................................................................................................... 3
Pre‐Existing Forum for Addressing GBV.......................................................................................... 4
Considering Co‐Leadership ............................................................................................................. 4
Establishing and Formalizing Leadership ........................................................................................ 5
Provider of Last Resort................................................................................................................ 5
A7
Acronyms
AoR Area of Responsibility
CERF Central Emergency Response Fund
CAP Consolidated Appeals Process
GBV Gender‐Based Violence
HC Humanitarian Coordinator
IASC Inter‐Agency Standing Committee
NGO Non‐governmental Organization
SOP Standard Operating Procedure(s)
ToR Terms of Reference
UN United Nations
UNCT United Nations Country Team
UNFPA United Nations Population Fund
UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
UNICEF United Nations Fund for Children
WG Working Group
WHO World Health Organization
The intention of this Guidance Note is to outline the minimum mandatory actions that must be taken
by the global co‐leads of the GBV AoR – the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United
Nations Fund for Children (UNICEF) – to establish field‐level structures for the coordination of multi‐
sectoral action to address GBV in “clusterized” humanitarian contexts.
As established by the Principles of the Inter‐Agency Standing Committee (IASC) under the auspices of
the Global Protection Cluster, UNFPA and UNICEF share responsibility for leading the global‐level GBV
AoR. As outlined in Annex 1, at a minimum this entails development and implementation of a multi‐
year strategic framework; day‐to‐day management and coordination of the working group; capacity
development and technical assistance (at global and field levels, as requested); sharing information on
good practices, relevant documents and tools, etc.; fundraising; engaging in advocacy and outreach
on GBV issues (as representatives of the working group); and representing the working group in
global inter‐agency forums (e.g. within the IASC).
While there is no set formula for determining who (which agency(ies) and which individual within
A7
that agency) assumes leadership for coordinating GBV interventions in a cluster context, the following
general rules can guide field actors in determining an appropriate leadership structure for GBV
coordination:
2. Where neither UNFPA nor UNICEF have the capacity to assume this leadership role, both
UNFPA and UNICEF have equal responsibility to work together with the Humanitarian
Coordinator, the Protection Cluster lead (where relevant), the Humanitarian Country Team and
relevant NGOs, Red Cross/Red Crescent and Government actors to identify and support an agency
to take on a leadership role in the coordination of inter‐agency GBV interventions. This
could be a UN entity, international or national NGO, or the Government.
3. Where there is no Protection Cluster but GBV has been identified as a priority area of concern
to the Humanitarian Country Team and the cluster system is in place, UNFPA and UNICEF should
coordinate with other relevant entities and NGOs to support and/or establish an inter‐agency
GBV coordination body, in line with the actions outlined in this Guidance Note. See Table 1:
Determining Leadership.
1
Funding is used here to mean financial resources for organizing and conducting the GBV AoR coordination activities
including holding regular meetings, obtaining information from and transmitting information to field actors, and capacity
building for coordination group members (e.g. resources for email, phone calls, printing, training materials etc.).
Section Six: Annexes 143
Pre‐Existing Forum for Addressing GBV
Where an inter‐agency group already exists to coordinate GBV prevention and response activities,
this body should always be considered first as a potential forum for coordinating GBV in a cluster
context. Do not establish parallel structures unless absolutely necessary; make what exists stronger
and sustainable.
Potential situations when setting up a parallel structure might be considered include:
A gender coordination body exists, but this forum does not allow for sufficient focus on the issue of
GBV in emergencies, and within this body are too many organizations focusing on gender more
broadly. Possible solution: Creation of a GBV Task Force that includes institutions working
directly on GBV prevention and response that reports to both the existing gender coordination
body and the Protection Cluster.
A GBV coordination structure already exists, but the group does not specifically address the issue of
GBV in emergencies. Possible solution: Creation of a GBV in Emergencies Sub‐ working Group.
A national, Government‐led GBV coordination structure already exists, but a gap analysis highlights
that this group is not as effective as it could be. Possible solution: Development of a joint UNCT and
NGO program to bolster the activities of this coordination structure.
Considering Co‐Leadership
A7
Where feasible, it is often preferable to have two entities in a co‐lead role for coordinating GBV
interventions, e.g. both UNFPA and UNICEF or either UNFPA or UNICEF plus an NGO, Government
GBV AoR Guidance Note
or other UN partner. In all cases – whether co‐leading with a UN agency, NGO, the Government or other
relevant entity – the roles and responsibilities of each actor, as well as their limitations, must be clearly
articulated and widely disseminated.
When considering co‐leadership with the Government, it is important to think about the potential
security concerns for frontline NGOs and impact on participation. For example, in contexts where the
State is implicated in the perpetration of incidents of sexual violence, it may not be in the best interests
of those we are seeking to support (those who have been abused and those at risk of experiencing
abuse) to engage the Government in a co‐leadership capacity.
Indeed, in many such contexts, Government actors are often not invited to participate in Protection
Cluster working groups. Determination of Government participation in a GBV AoR must be made by
the GBV AoR (co‐)leads together with UNHCR, NGOs and other relevant field actors on a case‐by‐case
basis.
Both the potential benefits and challenges to partnering with a non‐UN entity (e.g. Government or NGO)
for GBV coordination in an emergency must be considered. Potential benefits include:
Enhanced Government ownership that leads to more responsive and sustainable action over the
long term.
The GBV AoR working group is more reflective of the humanitarian community as a whole, e.g. by
being less UN centric and by being able to better represent and discuss operational issues; and
In certain areas where the designated UN lead is not present, a Government or NGO lead can
ensure that GBV AoR coordination continues at field level.
The decision to have an NGO or Government entity play a co‐leadership role within the GBV AoR
should be related to its strategic positioning within the Protection Cluster (where relevant) and/or
144 Section Six: Annexes
amongst other country‐level GBV actors. The Government or NGO’s choice of role within the
GBV AoR should be in line with its programme capacity, relations with other relevant GBV actors, and
experience addressing GBV in the country. Additionally, consideration of a Government actor or NGO
for the AoR co‐lead role must be based on the presence of (or intention to hire) a suitable staff
member to effectively meet the co‐lead requirements, as further outlined in this Guidance Note.
In the event that an appropriate NGO or Government body is identified as the primary AoR lead entity,
but this institution does not feel as though they can dedicate a staff person to take on this role, or if
they feel as though it might have negative outcomes for their institution, UNFPA and UNICEF should
work together to identify an alternative solution. This might include ensuring that there is at
minimum short‐term GBV coordination leadership capacity through the ProCap or GenCap standby
personnel rosters.
Once leadership has been determined and agreed upon, in all cases – whether co‐leadership with a
UN agency, NGO, Government or other relevant entity – it is imperative that the division of labour
between the co‐leads is clearly articulated and communicated to relevant stakeholders. This should
include drafting, and finalizing/agreeing upon TORs for the coordination body and possibly developing
a Memorandum of Understanding between the co‐ leads. Annex 1 (Co‐Lead/Co‐Chair Responsibilities)
can be used as a guide for developing TORs.
A7
Provider of Last Resort
a. Mapping2 all relevant actors (e.g. identifying who is doing what and where) and existing relevant
coordination bodies or working groups (including in fields such as gender, health, etc.) that
could be supported and/or mobilized to form a GBV AoR working group.
b. Allocating a full‐time, usually mid‐ to senior‐level staff person to the role of GBV
Coordinator, with distinct functions for GBV coordination over agency‐specific
programme management (see Annex 2 for sample TOR). This person must have relevant
organizational support, including adequate funds and support staff.
c. Mobilizing participation by UN, NGO, Red Cross/Red Crescent, and (as appropriate) donors
and Government actors in the GBV AoR working group.
d. Drafting an AoR ToR, strategic framework and time‐bound work plan, drawing upon existing
models.
2
Mapping is used here to refer to identifying exactly what key actors are doing with regard to GBV‐related prevention
and response activities as opposed to the mapping of services that are available to survivors.
Section Six: Annexes 145
e. Developing Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) using the IASC GBV SOP template.
f. Disseminating and ensuring comprehension and use of the IASC Guidelines for Gender‐ Based
Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Settings (IASC, 2005).
g. Ensuring inclusion of GBV in all relevant humanitarian funding processes (CAP, CERF, Flash and
other appeals, etc.) and humanitarian action plans.
h. Representing the GBV AoR working group in the Protection Cluster and ensuring that
GBV issues are given adequate attention and consideration in that forum.
i. Ensuring cross‐cluster coordination by interacting with other relevant cluster leads (e.g.
Health, Water and Sanitation, Nutrition, Education etc.) and working group meetings and by
identifying GBV AoR working group focal points for participation in other relevant clusters
and working groups.
j. Where relevant, catalyzing and supporting sub‐national structures for GBV coordination.
A7
GBV AoR Guidance Note
The IASC has also agreed that it should be used in major “new” emergencies requiring a multi‐sectoral
response with participation of a wide range of international humanitarian actors. In such situations,
the cluster approach should be used from the start to plan and organize the international response.3
Protection Cluster?
A7
YES NO
3
http://www.humanitarianreform.org/humanitarianreform/Default.aspx?tabid=202?tabid=202
Section Six: Annexes 147
Annex 1: Co‐Lead/Co‐Chair Roles and Responsibilities
CO‐LEADS AT GLOBAL LEVEL (UNFPA and UNICEF)
1. Develop multi‐year strategic framework as a component of the PCWG framework: a. In consultation
with co‐chair and members, develop overall vision and projected outputs over time to advance the
work of the AoR; b. Monitor progress toward achieving outputs and modify strategic vision and
framework as necessary; c. in consultation with co‐chair develop annual workplan and budget
2. Management/Coordination: a. Rotate co‐chair responsibilities on an annual basis; b. Review and
provide input to all meeting agendas (monthly and annual/bi‐annual planning and review meetings)
and review/approve draft meeting minutes prior to distribution; c. Participate in all AoR meetings; d.
represent AoR at relevant cluster meetings as necessary
3. Capacity development / Technical assistance: a. Support development of standard templates,
training materials and guidance notes for: strategic planning and standard operating procedures roll‐
out; training and capacity development; field‐level identification of AoR lead agency; data collection;
monitoring and evaluation, etc; b. provide technical guidance to field‐level GBV Working Groups on all
of the above as requested and with field missions when necessary
4. Information Sharing: a. Facilitate information‐sharing within the group and with external
stakeholders on events, news articles, documents, etc.; b. Gather and share good practices, data
collection methodologies and tools, and other information of interest to AoR members and the
Protection Cluster Working Group; c. Maintain AoR website including reviewing all documents for
posting and reviewing site for revision; d. Maintain stocks of all relevant guidelines and distribute to
field‐level GBV working groups as requested
A7
5. Fundraising: a. Liaise directly with donors to solicit funds to support inter‐agency AoR activities;
b. Develop (multi‐year) funding proposals that reflect strategic framework and annual work plan; c.
Manage all grants received and report to donors and AoR members
GBV AoR Guidance Note
6. Advocacy/Outreach: a. Lead on global advocacy priorities identified by the AoR; b. Liaise with
UN Action and the IASC SWG on Gender in Humanitarian Action (including the GenCap Secretariat)
to keep those groups engaged in AoR developments, solicit input/feedback, and identify areas for
collaboration; c. Gather and share good practices, data collection methodologies and tools, and other
information of interest to AoR members and the Protection Cluster Working Group
7. Representation: a. Represent GBV AoR in global inter‐agency fora (IASC, UN Action) and with donors
1. Develop, monitor and advance annual workplan as a component of the PCWG framework:
a. Develop workplan and budget in consultation with AoR stakeholders; b. Monitor workplan
implementation and provide quarterly updates to AoR; c. Assist to develop, review and endorse
GBV AoR documents (e.g. guidance notes, website materials) related to workplan
2. Management/Coordination: a. Facilitate meetings on a bi‐monthly basis; b. Set meeting
agendas, organize meeting logistics, manage minutes, follow‐up on action points; c. Participate in
all AoR meetings; d. Represent AoR at relevant events and meetings as necessary
3. Capacity development / Technical assistance: a. Support development of standard templates,
training materials and guidance notes for: strategic planning and SOP roll‐out; training and capacity
development; field‐level identification of AoR lead agency; data collection; monitoring and evaluation,
etc; b. provide technical guidance to field‐level GBV Working Groups on all of the above as requested
4. Information Sharing: a. Facilitate information‐sharing within the group and with external
stakeholders on events, news articles, documents, etc.; b. Gather and share good practices, data
collection methodologies and tools, and other information of interest to AoR members and the
Protection Cluster Working Group; c. Work with co‐lead to maintain AoR website including reviewing,
editing and regularly updating site with documents and relevant information
5. Fundraising: a. Review and endorse GBV AoR funding proposal(s); b. Assist to secure
necessary financing; c. Assist with developing donor reports and communicating with AoR
members on expenditures
A7
Develop (multi‐year) funding proposals that reflect strategic framework and workplans; c. Manage
all grants received and report to donors and WG members
4. Information Sharing: a. Facilitate information‐sharing within the group, with the global‐level GBV
1. Identify GBV AoR Lead: a. Determine capacity of either global co‐lead for field‐level GBV AoR/sub‐
cluster/working group coordination to ensure predictable leadership and multi‐sectoral prevention
and response programming; b. Determine other relevant UN or NGO partner for co‐leadership/
leadership (the latter if neither of the global co‐leads is able/willing to coordinate); c. Allocate
existing agency resources and mobilize additional urgent resources (e.g. through CAP, CERF, Flash
Appeals, other resources) to support GBV coordination staff and functions (personnel, programming,
assessments, training, etc.)
2. Establish/Support Working Group(s): a. Support and coordinate with existing groups and/or
catalyze the formation of inter‐agency, multi‐sectoral GBV coordination groups at national, zonal, and
provincial levels; b. Develop ToR and strategic framework; c. Facilitate meetings, manage minutes, and
follow‐up on action points; d. Feed into and coordinate with national Protection Cluster and other
AoRs, e.g. Child Protection (where they exist) as well as other relevant clusters
data with an emphasis on identifying trends and patterns and feedback information to AoR members;
c. Develop monthly report formats that capture relevant information and that support the analysis and
evaluation of program progress and outcomes
GBV AoR Guidance Note
JOB DESCRIPTION
The GBV Coordinator facilitates and coordinates rapid implementation of GBV programming in an
acute humanitarian emergency setting in accordance with the IASC Guidelines for GBV Interventions
in Humanitarian Settings. GBV programming in humanitarian emergencies is multi‐sectoral, involving
multiple organizations and actors from the displaced and host communities, NGO and government
implementing partners, UN agencies, and other national and international organizations to engage
in comprehensive prevention and response initiatives. The GBV Coordinator’s duties include
liaison and coordination with other organizations (coalition building), training and sensitization,
strategic planning, monitoring and evaluation. The Coordinator will use the IASC Guidelines for GBV
Interventions in Humanitarian Settings and companion materials (orientation and training guides,
planning worksheets, etc.) to facilitate planning, coordination, monitoring and evaluation of GBV
initiatives.
A7
peacekeeping missions.
3. Lead efforts to develop a coordinated multi‐sectoral and inter‐agency prevention and
response program to include referral and reporting mechanisms, information sharing,
1. Work with the GBV coordination groups to revise GBV Incident Report and other relevant forms
as needed for the setting. Train partner organizations and other sectors in use of this form with
particular emphasis on the Guiding Principles for Working with GBV Survivors.
2. Collect, compile, and analyze monthly GBV report data with an emphasis on identifying trends
and patterns. Develop monthly report formats that capture relevant information and that
support the analysis and evaluation of program progress and outcomes.
Administrative and Miscellaneous Duties
1. Write monthly work plans, monthly reports, and other reports as needed or requested.
2. Assist in writing proposals and other fundraising efforts to support joint programming.
3. Other duties as required.
The inter‐agency working group that coordinates multi‐sectoral interventions to address GBV in a
humanitarian context may be referred to as any of the following: sub‐cluster, working group, area
of responsibility, task force, consortium, etc. In a cluster context, the most common (unofficial)
designation for this body is “GBV Sub‐Cluster”.
Coordination in the context of addressing GBV is the operationalisation of multi‐sectoral, inter‐ agency
action – the process of moving from theory to practice. In a humanitarian emergency, coordination
means: promoting participation; sharing and synthesizing information; identifying and filling
A7
gaps; advocating for action (all levels), including by mainstreaming GBV prevention and response
actions into all sectors/clusters of humanitarian response; prioritizing urgent needs as defined by
the beneficiary population (especially survivors and those most at risk for experiencing GBV); and
Accountability is the obligation of power‐holders to take responsibility and to answer for their
actions. In coordinating GBV interventions, we are first accountable to our beneficiaries and
especially to the survivors themselves and those most at risk for experiencing GBV. Ultimate
accountability for ensuring inter‐agency action to address GBV in a humanitarian context lies with
the designated GBV sub‐cluster lead agency (or agencies). When this responsibility is assumed by
an NGO, accountability and responsibility (e.g. to the global GBV AoR lead entities and/or to the
Protection Cluster lead in country) must be clearly articulated and outlined in a MoU between the
NGO and the relevant UN entities.
A GBV Coordinator may be responsible either for coordinating all GBV programmes within a single
agency or may be charged with overseeing inter‐agency, multi‐sectoral coordination, e.g. in the
context of a GBV sub‐cluster. While in most cluster contexts the inter‐agency GBV Coordinator will
be at a senior level and will be employed by a United Nations entity, inter‐ agency GBV coordinators
may also represent Government, NGO or other relevant actors depending on the context. Annex 2
provides a full sample Terms of Reference (ToR) for an inter‐agency GBV Coordinator in a humanitarian
emergency.
154
WHO WHAT WHERE FORM OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE
PREVENTION AND RESPONSE ACTIVITIES
Please provide specific information under the health, psychosoicial, legal and security columns
A9
Sample Training Information Matrix
The Consolidated Appeal Process (CAP) is a tool used by aid organizations to plan, coordinate, fund,
implement and monitor their activities. The CAP fosters a more thoughtful and thorough approach to
humanitarian action.
• A framework for monitoring the strategy and revising it if and to appeal for funds cohesively instead of competitively.
necessary.
It is important to list all projects, regardless of whether they are likely to be funded
by other donors. This helps to highlight funding shortfalls and reinforce advocacy
messages. NGO projects can be listed separately, rather than under the umbrella
of a UN agency (e.g., UNFPA), which can help to overcome funding delays and
NGO concerns about autonomy.
A10
can exceed one year. In that case, “total project budget”
covers the entire project, while “funds requested” should be
the portion needed for 2009 only.
Needs
(What is the evidence for the needs that this project addresses? Be specific-do not simply repeat the
sectoral response plan’s needs analysis. State the evidence for needs for this project’s particular target
group (e.g., to propose a water and sanitation project for Bulungu, give the statistics for water supply
and water-related disease for Bulungu). Also, how does the project support overall strategic priorities
and sector objectives?)
Activities
(What are the project’s main activities?)
This section should be in bullet format whenever possible.
•
•
•
Outcomes
(What are the expected outcomes?)
Also in bullet format.
•
•
•
TOTAL
Values should be rounded off to the nearest thousand. Budget item lines can include items
such as staff costs, input costs, administrative costs, etc. The value in the “total” line of the
financial summary should match exactly the “funds requested for 2009” line in the box at
the top of the page.
Please DO NOT send project sheets longer than one page (nor should you shrink the standard
margins and font). Such modifications will result in the project sheet being returned to
the agency and not included in the appeal until shortened to one page. Remember that a
project sheet is an “advertisement” for a project and that interested donors will contact the
agency if they require additional information.
A10
DO NOT send joint or multi-agency projects without specifying the funding breakdown per
agency. Otherwise, FTS will have to split the project funding requirement equally among
FAQs on FLASH, CERF, CAP and CAP Template
the joint appealing agencies. You can add columns to the budget summary box as shown
below:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Budget items UNFPA UNICEF WHO $
Rehabilitation of youth-friendly spaces and equipment 45,000 0 0 45,000
Technical assistance (staff cost and supervision) 40,000 70,000 35,000 145,000
IEC/BCC activities and non-formal training activities 60,000 70,000 0 130,000
Training and refresher training at basic services level 50,000 50,000 40,000 140,000
Condoms, oral contraceptives, STI kits, treatment, etc. 80,000 60,000 30,000 170,000
Adaptation/production of training modules and
30,000 0 30,000 60,000
materials
Monitoring and evaluation 30,000 25,000 13,500 68,500
Sub-total 335,000 275,000 148,500 758,500
Administrative costs (7%) 23,450 19,250 10,395 53,095
Total 358,450 294,250 158,895 811,595
DO NOT forward incomplete project sheets. They will not be published in the
CAP.
The CERF is a UN standby fund for timely, effective and reliable humanitarian assistance for victims
of natural disasters, complex emergencies and time-limited responses to deteriorating situations in
protracted emergencies. CERF application is initiated, and submission has to be endorsed, by the HC/
RC.
Life-saving criteria
Sexual violence programmes can be funded under CERF as part of an agency’s provision of core
humanitarian needs. Field-based actors are encouraged to liaise with the Humanitarian Coordinator’s
office to submit projects incorporating GBV prevention and response elements. SGBV can be
incorporated into the following sectors for CERF responses: Education, Health, Protection/Human
Rights/Rule of law, and Water and Sanitation.
A10
What do you need to do?
1. Lobby and advocate for life-saving SGBV function with HC/RC, IASC, clusters
2. Collate available evidence / information on SGBV (assessed/demonstrable needs)
• Evidence or demonstrable needs in SGBV are crucial (make direct link between
concerns and remedy – i.e., mitigation of direct physical arm or threat)
• No recurrent, running and sectoral coordination costs allowed
• No activities if not directly linked to life-saving criteria – i.e., capacity building only in
relation to life-saving functions
• NGOs can access funding only through UN agencies – including IOM
The Flash Appeal is a tool for structuring a coordinated humanitarian response for the first three
to six months of an emergency.
The Flash Appeal is issued within one week of an emergency. It provides a concise (maximum 10
pages) overview of urgent life-saving needs within one week of the onset of an emergency. It addresses
acute needs and recovery projects that can be implemented within the Flash Appeal timeframe (up to six
months), based on the best available information at the time of writing.
• The Flash Appeal may be developed into a Consolidated Appeal if the emergency
FAQs on FLASH, CERF, CAP and CAP Template
1
Adapted from Wash Cluster handbook and IASC Guidelines for Flash Appeal:
http://www.humanitarianreform.org/humanitarianreform/Portals/1/Resources & tools/Guidelines for Flash appeals.pdf
160 Section Six: Annexes
Education Cluster
CAP 2010
In order for the projects to be selected for the CAP, they need to meet several ‘selection criteria’,
which were determined at the CAP Workshop and confirmed by the UN Country Team. If a project
does not meet one of the selection criteria, it will be DESELECTED and will not be submitted as one
of the CAP projects for submission.
One of the selection criteria for the 2010 CAP projects is:
“The project reflects the cross-cutting issues of gender, HIV/AIDS, protection, and age, unless
otherwise justified.”
2. Subsequent to the selection criteria for the projects is the prioritization process, during which
the cluster determines which of their project sheets should take priority over others. One of the
prioritization criteria for the 2010 CAP projects is:
A11
Exclusion of gender could result in lower prioritization of the project.
In order for the projects to be selected for the CAP, they need to meet several ‘selection
criteria’, which were determined at the CAP Workshop and confirmed by the UN Country
Team. If a project does not meet one of the selection criteria, it will be DESELECTED and
will not be submitted as one of the CAP projects for submission.
One of the selection criteria for the 2010 CAP projects is:
“The project reflects the cross-cutting issues of gender, HIV/AIDS, protection, and
age, unless otherwise justified.”
2. Subsequent to the selection criteria for the projects is the prioritization process, during which
the cluster determines which of their project sheets should take priority over others. One of
the prioritization criteria for the 2010 CAP projects is:
A11
“Does the project, where appropriate, include gender aspects, and a component
preventing or reducing the impact of gender-based violence”
Zimbabwe CAP Cluster Guidance Notes
A11
Zimbabwe CAP Cluster Guidance Notes
In order for the projects to be selected for the CAP, they need to meet several ‘selection
criteria’, which were determined at the CAP Workshop and confirmed by the UN Country
Team. If a project does not meet one of the selection criteria, it will be DESELECTED and
will not be submitted as one of the CAP projects for submission.
One of the selection criteria for the 2010 CAP projects is:
“The project reflects the cross-cutting issues of gender, HIV/AIDS, protection, and
age, unless otherwise justified.”
2. Subsequent to the selection criteria for the projects is the prioritization process, during which
the cluster determines which of their project sheets should take priority over others. One of
the prioritization criteria for the 2010 CAP projects is:
A11
“Does the project, where appropriate, include gender aspects, and a component
preventing or reducing the impact of gender-based violence”
Zimbabwe CAP Cluster Guidance Notes
In order for the projects to be selected for the CAP, they need to meet several ‘selection
criteria’, which were determined at the CAP Workshop and confirmed by the UN Country
Team. If a project does not meet one of the selection criteria, it will be DESELECTED and
will not be submitted as one of the CAP projects for submission.
One of the selection criteria for the 2010 CAP projects is:
“The project reflects the cross-cutting issues of gender, HIV/AIDS, protection, and
age, unless otherwise justified.”
2. Subsequent to the selection criteria for the projects is the prioritization process, during which
the cluster determines which of their project sheets should take priority over others. One of
the prioritization criteria for the 2010 CAP projects is:
A11
“Does the project, where appropriate, include gender aspects, and a component
preventing or reducing the impact of gender-based violence”
Resources:
Zimbabwe CAP Cluster Guidance Notes
In order for projects to be selected for the CAP, they need to meet several ‘selection criteria’,
which were determined at the CAP Workshop and confirmed by the UN Country Team. If a
project does not meet one of the selection criteria, it will be DESELECTED and will not be
submitted as one of the CAP projects for submission.
One of the selection criteria for the 2010 CAP projects is:
“The project reflects the cross-cutting issues of gender, HIV/AIDS, protection, and
age, unless otherwise justified.”
2. Subsequent to the selection criteria for the projects is the prioritization process, during which
the cluster determines which of their project sheets should take priority over others. One of
the prioritization criteria for the 2010 CAP projects is:
A11
“gender is reflected throughout the project”
In the case of our work, much of what we do and why we are doing it can generate news coverage if it is
presented to the right person, at the right time and in an interesting and appealing way. If you have an idea
about an upcoming event, a programme, or a situation that you think may attract news coverage, discuss it with
your manager or communications department. But first, here are 10 qualities that make a story newsworthy.
The first six apply to our work in particular.
Timeliness
The word news means exactly that - things that are new. Topics that are timely are good newsworthy. Events that
happened last week are no longer interesting. When it comes to our work, there are certain “pegs”, or calendar
tie-ins or reasons a story should be told now: International Women’s Day, the anniversary of a war ending, six
months after an election. Develop a calendar of newsworthy pegs and pitch stories in advance of them.
Significance
The number of people affected by the story is important. An earthquake in which hundreds of people died is more
significant than a quake killing a dozen. An organisation’s ability to continue aiding hundreds of thousands of
women in North Kivu, DRC, despite mounting violence is more significant than its ability to do so in more peaceful
A12
times.
Proximity
A story that seems near to an audience, either in regard to geographic location or personal relevance, is
Prominence
A story featuring a topic or person who is considered important or well-known is newsworthy. If Secretary-General
Ban Ki Moon is visiting your region, and there is a tie-in with your work, capitalize on his visit and pitch a story.
Human interest
These stories are designed to arouse the audience’s emotions, based on the people and problems described in the
story. A human-interest story highlights the extraordinary troubles or triumphs of a person or group of people.
Audiences can better relate to an issue when they see how it has affected another.
Consequence
A story that shows the effect or result of an event or action. Example: a school built in the aftermath of war has
graduated X classes of children and sent Y onto college.
Novelty
A story that is about something new or that examines an issue in a new way.
Suspense
A story with an uncertain outcome.
Conflict
A story where there is opposition, disagreement or controversy.
Sensationalism
A story intended to have a startling or scandalous effect.
Example One: In Liberia, Helping Vulnerable Women Advance with Small Businesses
Problem/issue:
The bodies and spirits of women and girls are the forgotten frontline in conflicts throughout the world.
Sexual violence is not just a by-product of war; it is a strategy of combat systematically used to terrorize
and humiliate.
Around the world, the International Rescue Committee helps survivors heal and works with communities
A13
and institutions to break the cycle of violence. As first-responders in emergencies such as in Central
African Republic, the IRC works hands-on to deliver urgent care and referrals for victims of assault. In
longstanding crises, such as Darfur, we provide safe spaces for women to come together for support
Developing an Effective Message
and to build skills at our women’s centers. And in the aftermath of war, such as in West Africa, the
IRC addresses the root causes of violence against women by helping them gain greater economic
independence and play a more meaningful role in decision-making.
In Lofa County, Liberia, the IRC has provided seed money and training to vulnerable women, many of
them rape survivors. The IRC reached out to women, asked them what types of businesses they believed
would succeed, assisted women in putting those plans into action, and provided support as their
businesses took off.
The recovery of communities devastated by war relies heavily on the participation of women and girls.
Being able to provide for themselves, and oftentimes their children, means women are less likely to
fall prey to violence. The IRC works to foster conditions in which women and girls not only survive the
effects of conflict, but ultimately thrive.
Problem/issue:
Children are the first victims of war and other humanitarian emergencies.
During Sierra Leone’s decade-long civil war, many children were abducted and forced to become child
soldiers. Now that war has ended…but for children stripped of their childhoods, they lack the support
they need to thrive.
The International Rescue Committee sees education as one of the primary strategies for protecting
children. In the places where we work, this means using education as a way of mitigating the worst
effects of war, mass displacement and natural disaster. “Normalcy” doesn’t exist. But developing a safe
and nurturing environment where children can be children again and resume their education is critical.
The IRC has established schools and vocational training programmes for former child soldiers across
Sierra Leone. We work together with the government Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports to support
former child soldiers’ general psychosocial well-being through educational programming.
Education is the key to helping young people develop. It prepares them for a constructive adulthood and
active participation in the rebuilding of their countries. In Sierra Leone and around the world, helping
children become what they are capable of being is our way of encouraging a better tomorrow.
A13
Developing an Effective Message
Here are some basic guidelines to assist you in developing a press release:
1. At the top, include your organization’s logo, office address, phone number, the words “For
Immediate Release” and the release date.
2. Type the name and phone number of the one or two people who should be contacted for
more information or interviews. These people must be easily reachable by telephone for at least
two days after the release is distributed.
3. Create a powerful headline that conveys the essential message of the release.
4. Write the release like a news story, with the information in descending order of importance.
5. Emphasize the ‘newsiest’ elements of your story and include one or two quotes from staff
members who can be interviewed.
6. Make sure that the release answers ALL of the key elements of any statement - who, when,
A14
7. Keep the sentences and paragraphs short and avoid insider jargon and acronyms.
The Press Release
10. At the end, include the statement, “For more information, visit our web site, www.
ourorganization.org.”
Throughout the Kenyan post-election crisis, many forms of gender-based violence have been recorded in individual
testimony and field-based assessments. Rape and torture were the most immediate and dangerous types of gender-
based violence occurring in this humanitarian crisis. Statistics from the Nairobi Women’s Hospital indicate that 90
percent of the cases the hospital has received since the violence began have been gang rapes. The gangs involved
range from groups of two men to as many as 11.
The GBV sub-cluster group, made up of organizations that are focused on gender-based violence, wish to strongly
condemn these sexual violations and demand that sexual violence stops, including sexual exploitation and abuse.
For the purposes of this statement the term “sexual exploitation” means any actual or attempted abuse of a position
of vulnerability, differential power or trust, for sexual purposes, including, but not limited to, profiting monetarily,
socially or politically from the sexual exploitation of another. Similarly, the term “sexual abuse” means the actual or
threatened physical intrusion of a sexual nature, whether by force or under unequal or coercive conditions.
A15
The sexual exploitation and abuse issues of particular concern for us are related to reports of aid workers abusing
their positions of authority within IDP camps. There is an explicit mandate about the role of aid workers in
camps to promote and protect human rights . According to the UN Secretary-General’s Bulletin of 2003, sexual
Preliminary findings of a rapid assessment report done in mid-January by the UN suggests that perpetrators within
communities across Kenya have exploited the conflict in order to commit sexual violence with impunity, and efforts
to protect or respond to the needs of women and girls are remarkably insufficient.
We further note that risks of sexual violence are ongoing for women and young girls seeking sanctuary in IDP
settlements. We therefore recommend that measures be put in place to stop the violence, to offer protection to
women and children, to investigate the crimes that have already been committed and to prosecute the perpetrators.
We also demand that displaced persons in the camps be provided accessible information about standards, laws and
appropriate responses to such violations as well as the establishment of a report-back mechanism.
We call upon His Excellency the President Mwai Kibaki and Honorable Raila Odinga and members of Parliament
to aggressively and proactively deal with this social injustice by supporting the agreements of disarming and
demobilizing the militia, who as we know have been responsible for a good number of the gang rapes. In the long-
term we call upon them to establish elaborate systems of preventing, protecting and responding to all forms of
gender-based violence and respect of women’s rights.
“A gender perspective should be integrated into all disaster risk management policies, plans and decision-
making processes…”
Hyogo Framework for Action, adopted by 168 countries at the World Disaster Reduction Conference, Kobe,
January 2005
Signing organizations
List of organizations attached
1. Privacy and confidentiality: Remind reporters to pay attention to the refugee’s right to privacy and
confidentiality and the need to protect the refugee from any harm and retribution, including the potential
for harm and retribution.
2. Sensitivity and safety: Ask the reporter to avoid questions, attitudes or comments that are
insensitive to cultural values, that place a refugee in danger or expose a refugee to humiliation, or that
reactivate a refugee’s pain and grief from traumatic events.
3. Comfort level: Ask the reporter to pay attention to where and how the refugee is interviewed and try
to make certain that the refugee is comfortable and able to tell his or her story without outside pressure,
including from the reporter.
4. Comprehension: Ensure that the refugee knows he or she is talking to a reporter and understands
what it means.
5. Permission: Secure permission from the refugee for all interviews, videotaping and documentary
photographs. This permission must be obtained in a manner that ensures the refugee is not coerced
in any way; the refugee must also understand the implications of being part of a story that might be
A16
6. Identity protection: Change the name and obscure the visual identity of any refugee who is:
• A current or former child combatant, regardless of whether he or she is accused of violence or
Ethics and Sensitivity
atrocities
• A survivor of sexual abuse or exploitation, unless it is an adult who wants to tell his/her story
publicly,
• A perpetrator of physical or sexual abuse,
• HIV positive or living with AIDS, unless the adult refugee or the guardian of the refugee child
gives fully informed consent,
• Charged or convicted of a crime,
• Or who asks not to be identified for personal reasons.
Ask the reporter not to publish a story or image if doing so may put the refugee at risk even if identities
are changed, obscured or not used.
In certain cases, using a refugee’s identity – his or her name and/or recognizable image - is in the
refugee’s best interests. However, when the refugee’s identity is used, he or she must still be protected
against harm and supported through any stigmatization or reprisals. Some examples of these special
cases are:
• When a refugee initiates contact with the reporter, wanting to exercise his or her right to freedom
of expression.
• When a refugee is part of a sustained programme of activism or social mobilization and wants to
be so identified.
7. Children: In addition to applying the same principles described above, the following steps should be
taken when it comes to refugee children:
• Make sure those closest to the child’s situation and best able to assess it are consulted about the
political, social and cultural ramifications of any reportage.
• Secure permission for all interviews of the refugee child from his or her parents or a guardian.
A17
This will ensure you are up-to-date on what is being said or written about on the subject. Note
the types of questions asked and consider the effectiveness of the varied responses.
Solicited Interviews
About the situation you will be discussing, your organization’s programmes and its history.
Practice beforehand
Use the bathroom mirror!
Wear a logo
Wearing a T-shirt or hat with your organization’s logo is good advertising.
Name recognition
Remember to tell the reporter the name of your organization.
Use anecdotes
Stories say it all. Anecdotes are a great way to humanize complex subjects and illustrate your
main points.
Be courteous
Bear in mind who your audience is. The reporter is just the conduit. Do not get upset if he/she is
trying to provoke you.
Offer follow-up
Say, “If you would like me to review anything or provide you with additional information, I’m happy
to help.”
Stay calm
You know what you are talking about. You are the expert.
• Remember: the reporter need not run the show. Think of every response to a
question as an opportunity to talk about your organization’s mission and programmes and
provide positive information.
• In addition to the story the reporter wants to tell, stay focused on the story you want to
tell.
A18
change course with a transitional phrase to get the interview back on track. Some
suggestions:
Unsolicited Interviews
“But what I’d really like to emphasize is ...”
“I can’t speak about that but what I can tell you is ...”
“I think what you’re really asking is …”
“I think this speaks to a larger issue …”
Or in the case of GBV, “We respect the confidentiality of the women at our women’s
health centres.”
• And do not speculate. Speculation or inaccurate answers can damage your credibility
and that of your organization and undermine its programmes and policies. Offer to
provide the information later in the day or to put the reporter in touch with a person who
can answer the question. Never guess. The reporter will appreciate your efforts to
provide factual information.
• “I’m not qualified to answer that but let me refer you to…”
• If you cite figures that are not your own, make sure you cite the source.
**But what happens when you are actually in an interview that is getting
uncomfortable?**
Never guess
A19
Again, if you do not know the answer to a question, say so. Track down the answer later and
call the reporter.
Do not stonewall
Handling Controversy
Instead of stonewalling or saying “No Comment” when a sensitive subject arises -- which
makes you sound evasive and guilty -- try to explain why you are unable to divulge particular
information. “We’re gathering facts right now and we’ll respond as soon as we can.” This is far
more positive.
Stay calm
Do not become angry or antagonistic.
Option to terminate
If you become truly uncomfortable with the nature of the questions or suspect the reporter
is developing a negative or biased story, you always have the option of terminating the
conversation. Politely say that you do not feel you can contribute any more to the topic.
Defer
You always have the option of telling the reporter that his or her questions might be better
answered by the communications department. Make sure you alert the necessary persons to
the impending call.
1. Identify violence against women accurately through the internationally accepted definition in the 1993
UN Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women.
2. Use accurate, non-judgmental language. For instance, rape or sexual assault is not in any way to be
associated with normal sexual activity; and trafficking in women is not to be confused with prostitution.
Good journalists will strike a balance when deciding how much graphic detail to include. Too much
may be sensationalist and can be gratuitous; too little can weaken the survivor’s case. At all times, the
language of reporting should avoid suggestions that the survivors may be to blame, or were otherwise
responsible for the attack or acts of violence against them.
3. People who suffer in such an ordeal will not wish to be described as a ‘victim’ unless they
use the
word themselves. The use of labels can be harmful. A term that more accurately describes the reality of a
person who has suffered in this way is ‘survivor’.
4. Sensitive reporting means ensuring that the media interview meets the needs of the survivor. A female
interviewer should be on hand and the setting must always be secure and private, recognizing that there
may be a social stigma attached. Media must do everything they can to avoid exposing the interviewee
to further abuse. This includes avoiding actions that may undermine their quality of life or their standing
in the community.
5. Treat the survivor with respect. For journalists this means respecting privacy, providing detailed
and complete information about the topics to be covered in any interview, as well as how it will be
A20
reported. Survivors have the right to refuse to answer any questions or not to divulge more than they
are comfortable with. Journalists should make themselves available for later contact; providing contact
details to interviewees will ensure they are able to keep in contact if they wish or need to do so.
7. Tell the whole story: sometimes media identify specific incidents and focus on the tragic aspects,
but reporters do well to understand that abuse might be part of a long-standing social problem, armed
conflict or part of a community history.
8. Maintain confidentiality: as part of their duty of care, media and journalists have an ethical
responsibility not to publish or broadcast names or identify places that in any way might further
compromise the safety and security of survivors or witnesses. This is particularly important when those
responsible for violence are the police, or troops in a conflict, or agents of the state or government, or
people connected with other large and powerful organizations.
9. Use local resources: Media who contact experts, women’s groups and organizations on the ground
about proper interviewing techniques, questions and places will always do good work and avoid
situations – such as where it is unacceptable for male camera workers or reporters to enter a secluded
place – which can cause embarrassment or hostility. There is always virtue in reporters educating
themselves on the specific cultural contexts and respecting them.
10. Provide useful information: reports that include details of sources and the contact details of local
support organizations and services will provide vital and helpful information for survivors/witnesses and
their families and others who may be affected.
1
The Ethical Journalism Initiative is a global campaign of programmes and activities to support and strengthen
quality in media. It was adopted by the World Congress of the IFJ in Moscow in 2007 and was formally launched in
2008. The Ethical Journalism Initiative is a global campaign of programmes and activities to support and strengthen
quality in media. http://ethicaljournalisminitiative.org/en/contents/ifj-guidelines-for-reporting-on-violence-against-
women
Section Six: Annexes 179
IASC GBV Guidelines Sector Action Sheets
COMMUNITY SERVICES/CAMP MANAGEMENT/CAMP COORDINATION SECTOR
GBV Key Actions
1. Establish information-sharing and coordination systems among organizations that register new arrivals
and shelter/site planning organizations.
Key Actions:
• Participate in a coordinated situation analysis and use this
information for safe shelter and site planning programmes.
• During registration, identify individuals in need of shelter
assistance (i.e., those most vulnerable to sexual violence
(SV).
2. Select sites that allow sufficient shelter space for the population and that do not pose additional security
and protection risks.
Key Considerations:
A21
3. Establish shelter committees with equal female and male participation; monitor to ensure that women
participate in the decisions and that their needs are met.
Key Actions:
• Facilitate the participation of both women and men
by reviewing their other roles and support community
mechanisms to address barriers to women’s equal
participation.
• Provide both women and men with the same benefits for
their input and their work in construction.
4. Plan the physical layout of the site in collaboration with the community shelter committee, incorporating
prevention and response to SV.
Key Actions:
• Plan location of shelter areas to promote a sense of
community and reinforce community-based protection.
• Provide a common area for children to play where family
members can watch them from the shelter.
• Carefully plan water and sanitation facilities.
• Make arrangements for lighting in communal areas and
lighting for individual use.
5. Designate space for community centers, safe spaces for women/girls, child-friendly spaces, confidential
access to SV care at health centres, and other services and facilities related to prevention and response to
SV (allow for physical access, privacy and confidentiality/ anonymity).
Key Actions:
• Consult with women in the community to design a women’s
centre. In most sites, the women’s centre will be the space
for recreation, reproductive health (RH), and SV-related
services.
• Establish child-friendly spaces where children can meet
and share their experiences and concerns with staff and
each other.
• Mobilize women and girls to participate in managing the
spaces and activities.
6. Design communal shelters to maximize safety and prevent SV. If communal shelters are to be used, even
as temporary measures at the onset of the emergency:
Key Actions:
• Provide adequate material for partitions between families.
• Accommodate single women and single men in separate
A21
communal booths.
• Seek ongoing input from women to ensure their needs and
security concerns are addressed
7. Design and allocate shelters/plots to maximize safety and prevent sexual violence.
Key Actions:
• Ensure that individual shelter allocation does not
compromise protection.
• Establish clear, consistent and transparent systems for
shelter allocation, distribution of any shelter materials and
criteria for qualifying for shelter assistance.
• Provide materials that are necessary for shelter construction
but are not easily available in the environment.
• Do not make women and girls dependent on men for
shelter construction or shelter allocation.
• Conduct regular consultations with women, girls and
groups with special needs on shelter issues.
1. Assess and analyze information about the location(s), routes, means and personal safety for collecting
cooking and heating fuel. Participate in a coordinated situational analysis.
Key Actions:
• Consult with women and children, community leaders and
other relevant groups.
• Consult with the local community about their own safety
during fuel collection and about allowing the displaced
population safe access to collect fuel.
Key Actions:
• Provide fuel-efficient stoves to reduce the amount of fuel
required.
o Consult with women for selection of the type of
energy-saving fuel stove.
A21
Key Actions:
• Mobilize the community into mixed groups of men and
women to collect fuel.
• Establish regular patrols with reliable security personnel to
designated areas where organized firewood collection can
be done by the population at specified times.
4. When feasible and appropriate, request and ensure adequate funding to meet temporary fuel needs during
the early stages of an emergency and/or to provide fuel to community members who are unable to collect
their own fuel.
Key Actions:
• Fuel that is distributed should be culturally acceptable and
easy to use.
• Pay attention to the issue of displaced populations selling
firewood as a source of income and risking exposure to
violence while collecting fuel.
• Involve women and girls in any distribution of fuel.
• Identify priority groups that should receive fuel if fuel
distribution is not available for everyone.
Key Actions:
• If the survivor does not give consent to refer her case to
police/security, then incident information can be compiled
anonymously into data reports that give no identifying
information.
• Use this information to inform and problem-solve with the
community about security risks.
5. Provide individual sanitary packs for all women and girls from at least 13 to 49 years.
Key Actions:
• Estimate the number of menstruating women and girls at
A21
25% of the total population.
• Consult with women and girls to identify materials most
culturally appropriate.
6. Actively seek participation from relevant groups in the distribution of sanitary packs.
Key Actions:
• Consult with and facilitate the participation of women and
girls.
• Seek input and participation from community-based health
providers (e.g., health promoters, animators).
7. If there is an accurate database with disaggregated age and sex data, use that database to develop the
distribution list for sanitary packs. If there is no database, or if it is uncertain, inaccurate or incomplete,
collaborate with women and girls and community health providers to develop a distribution list. Avoid
using family ration or registration cards unless there is a clear indication of sex and age breakdown.
1. Plan education programme using guidance from the Minimum Standards for Education in Emergencies.
2. Keep children, particularly those at the primary school level, in school or create new schooling venues
when schools do not exist.
Key Actions:
• Link humanitarian services with schools.
• Monitor drop-out lists to determine if and why children are
leaving school.
• If children are dropping out of school because of lack of food,
provide school feeding.
• Provide assistance with school fees, materials and uniforms.
• Offer flexible school hours to accommodate children who cannot
attend school all day due to other responsibilities.
A21
3. Prevent sexual violence (SV) and maximize child survivors’ access to services by raising awareness among
students and teachers about SV and implementing prevention strategies in schools.
GBV Guidelines Sectoral Information Sheets
Key Actions:
• Inform teachers about SV, prevention strategies, potential after-
effects for children and how to access help and SV services in the
community.
• Actively recruit female teachers.
• Include discussion of SV in life skills training for teachers, girls and
boys in all educational settings.
• Ensure all teachers sign codes of conduct.
• Establish prevention and monitoring systems to identify risks in
schools and prevent opportunities for sexual exploitation and abuse
(SEA).
• Provide materials to assist teachers (i.e., “School in a box” and
recreation kits that include information on gender-based violence
and care for survivors).
• Provide psychosocial support to teachers who are coping with their
own psychosocial issues as well as those of their students.
4. Establish community-based activities and mechanisms in places where children gather for education to
prevent abuses like SV and recruitment by armed groups.
Key Actions:
• Provide facilities for recreation, games and sports at school and
ensure access and use by both boys and girls.
• Gain community support for school-based SV programming.
• Ensure parents and the community know about teachers’ codes of
conduct.
184 Section Six: Annexes
FOOD SECURITY SECTOR
GBV Key Actions
1. Collect sex-disaggregated data for planning and evaluation of food security strategies.
2. Incorporate strategies to prevent sexual violence (SV) in food security and distribution programmes at all
stages of the project cycle (including design, implementation, monitoring and follow-up), giving special
attention to groups in the community that are more vulnerable to SV.
Key Actions:
• Target food aid to women- and child-headed households.
Registering household ration cards in the names of women
rather than men can help to ensure that women have greater
control over food and that it is actually consumed.
• For polygamous families, issue separate ration cards for each
wife and her dependents. Carefully consider how to assign the
husband’s food ration and give clear information to all members
of the family (i.e., all wives).
A21
3. Involve women in the entire process of implementing food security strategies. Establish frequent and
Key Actions:
• Issue the household ration card in a woman’s name.
• Encourage women to collect the food at the distribution point.
• Give women the right to designate someone to collect the rations
on their behalf.
• Encourage women to form collectives to collect food.
• Conduct distributions at least twice per month to reduce the
amount of food that needs to be carried from distribution points.
• Introduce funds in project budgets to provide transport
support for community members unable to carry rations from
distribution points.
5. Include women in the process of selecting the location of the distribution point. Consideration should be
given to the following aspects:
Key Actions:
• The distance from the distribution point to the households
should not be greater than the distance from the nearest water or
A21
community.
• Locations with nearby presence of large numbers of men should
be avoided, particularly those where there is liberal access to
alcohol, or where armed persons are in the vicinity.
6. Establish sex-balanced food distribution committees that allow for the meaningful and equal participation
of women. Attention should be given to the following aspects:
Key Actions:
• Make sure food distribution is done by a sex-balanced team.
• Provide packaging that facilitates handling and can be re-used
for other domestic activities.
• Select the time of distribution according to women’s activities
and needs, to permit the organization of groups that can travel
together to and from the distribution point.
• Distribute food during the day. Leave enough time for women to
return to their homes during daylight.
Key Information:
• The size and composition of the household food rations.
• Beneficiary selection criteria.
• Distribution place and time.
• The fact that they do not have to provide services or favours in
exchange for receiving the rations.
• The proper channels available to them for reporting cases of
abuse linked to food distribution.
8. Reduce security risks at food distributions. Create “safe spaces” for women at distribution points.
Key Actions:
• Appeal to men in the beneficiary community to protect women
and ensure safe passage of women from distribution sites to
their homes.
• Ensure sex balance of those carrying out the distribution.
• If necessary, segregate men and women receiving rations, either
by having distributions for men and women at different times,
A21
or by establishing a physical barrier between them during the
distribution.
• Assure that food distribution teams and all staff of
9. Monitor security and instances of abuse at the distribution point as well as on departure roads.
Key Actions:
• Ensure there are women staff present during food distributions.
• Establish a community-based security plan for food distribution
sites and departure roads in collaboration with the community.
• Establish a security focal point at each of the distribution sites.
• Monitor security on departure roads and ensure that women
are not at an increased risk for violence by having the food
commodity.
1. When helping a survivor of sexual violence (SV), all actors must discuss safety/security issues and ensure
that either there is no immediate threat or that she has a realistic safety plan. She should be referred -
with her consent - to the system for safe shelter.
2. Mobilize the community to establish a system where survivors of SV can access safe shelter if it is not
safe to return to their place of residence.
Key Actions:
• Work with women in the community to form action groups.
• Consult with leaders, men’s groups and women’s groups.
• Set up structures so that survivors can stay with a family member
or community leader.
3. When family- or community-based solutions cannot be found for temporary housing, a short-term safe
A21
shelter may be the only option. ‘Safe shelters’ should be considered as a last resort because they are
difficult to manage, especially in the early stages of a humanitarian emergency.
GBV Guidelines Sectoral Information Sheets
Key Actions:
• Establish confidential referral systems.
• Plan for the safety and security for the family/individual/staff
providing or managing the safe shelter.
• Develop clear guidelines and rules for managing safe shelters to
prevent misuse and security problems. As soon as a survivor is
referred, a longer-term arrangement should be developed.
• Coordinate with all key SV response actors, especially psychosocial
services and security/protection staff.
• Liaise with camp management and/or shelter organizations at
the site to incorporate shelter allocation as a longer-term security
solution.
• Ensure that survivors have access to their food and non-food
rations while they live in the safe shelter.
• Ensure that survivors can be accommodated with their children in
the shelter if they so wish.
• Child survivors/victims should remain in their family shelters
when possible. When this is not possible, ensure that child
survivors receive extra attention and care at safe shelters.
1. Identify and mobilize appropriate existing resources in the community, such as traditional birth attendants
(TBAs), women’s groups, religious leaders and community services programmes.
Key Actions:
• Discuss issues of SV, survivors’ needs for emotional support and
evaluate the individuals, groups and organizations available in the
community to ensure they will be supportive, compassionate, non-
judgmental, confidential and respectful to survivors.
• Establish systems for confidential referrals among and between
community-based psychological and social support resources,
health and community services.
2. At all health and community services, listen and provide emotional support whenever a survivor discloses
or implies that she has experienced sexual violence. Give information, and refer as needed and agreed by
A21
the survivor.
Key Actions:
• Listen to the survivor and ask only non-intrusive, relevant and non-
Key Actions
• Persons interviewing and assisting chid survivors should possess
basic knowledge of child development and SV.
• Use creative methods to help put young children at ease and
facilitate communication.
• Use age-appropriate language and terms.
• When appropriate, include trusted family members to ensure that
the child is believed and supported in returning to normal life.
• Do not remove children from family care in order to provide
treatment (unless it is done to protect from abuse or neglect).
• Never coerce, trick or restrain a child whom you believe may have
experienced SV. Coercion and force are often characteristics of the
abuse, and using those techniques will further harm the child.
• Always be guided by the best interests of the child.
Key Actions
• Always adhere to the guiding principles for action:
A21
o Non-discrimination.
• Advocate on behalf of the survivor with relevant health, social,
legal and security agencies if the survivor provides informed
consent.
• Initiate community dialogues to raise awareness that SV is never
the fault of the survivor and to inform community about SV and
the availability of services.
• Provide material support as needed via health or other community
services.
• Facilitate participation and integration of survivors in the
community.
• Encourage use of appropriate traditional resources. Many such
practices can be extremely beneficial; however, ensure that they
do not perpetuate blaming-the-victim or otherwise contribute to
further harm to the survivor.
• Link with other sectors.
1. Implement the Minimum Initial Service Package of reproductive health in emergency situations (MISP).
Key Actions:
• Identify an organization(s) and individual(s) to facilitate the
coordination and implementation of the MISP.
• Prevent and manage the consequences of sexual violence.
• Reduce HIV transmission by:
i. Enforcing respect for universal precautions
ii. Guaranteeing the availability of free condoms.
• Prevent excess neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality by:
i. Providing clean delivery kits for use by mothers or birth
attendants to promote clean home deliveries
ii. Providing midwife delivery kits to facilitate clean and safe
A21
deliveries at the health facility
iii. Initiating the establishment of a referral system to
manage obstetric emergencies.
• Plan for the provision of comprehensive reproductive health
2. Conduct or participate in rapid situational analyses to address the accessibility for women and the
availability and capacity of health services to respond to the needs of women.
Key Actions:
• Make basic health care services available to all affected
populations.
• Locate health services within walking distance of communities
and on safe access roads.
• Make opening times convenient for women and children
(household duties, water and wood collection, school times).
• Set up a private exam room for women and girls.
• Recruit female staff where possible.
• Provide 24-hour access for pregnancy and SV services.
• Ensure that all languages in the ethnic sub-groups are represented
among health providers or that there are interpreters for each
ethnic sub-group.
• Establish evacuation plans for medical reasons, or mobile clinical
services where otherwise not available.
• Carefully consider access for girls, taking into consideration
cultural issues. For example, girls of a certain age, or who are
unmarried, may not be permitted to participate in reproductive
health services, so girls’ presence in those areas of a health
centre will be noted and questioned, which prevents anonymity,
A21
Key Actions:
• Ensure all staff are aware of and abide by medical confidentiality.
• Provide staff at health centres and hospitals with clear protocols
and sufficient supplies and equipment.
• Inform health staff on FGM, which may affect the health of
women and girls, and make protocols available on how to manage.
• Put in place an efficient and supportive supervisory system.
Key Actions:
• Involve women in decisions on accessibility and on an appropriate, non-
offensive, non-stigmatizing name for SV services.
• Make the community aware of services available at the health centre.
• Ensure men’s access to health care and counseling, and provide them
with information about women’s RH and about the health risks to the
community of SV.
Key Actions:
• Before starting a physical examination, prepare the victim/survivor.
Insensitive examinations may contribute to the emotional distress of the
victim/survivor.
• Introduce yourself and explain key procedures (e.g., pelvic exam).
• Ask if she wants to have a specific support person present.
• Obtain the consent of the victim/survivor or a parent if the victim is a
minor.
• Reassure the victim/survivor that she is in control of the pace of the
examination and that she has the right to refuse any aspect of the
examination she does not wish to undergo.
• Explain that the findings are confidential.
2. Perform an examination.
A21
Key Actions:
• At the time of physical examination, normalize any somatic symptoms of
1. Designate appropriate personnel to be responsible for recruitment and hiring of employees and
consultants (trained in human resources, knowledgeable about the risks of staff misconduct with
regard to sexual violence (SV) and SEA, and must be held accountable for implementing internationally
recognized standards in hiring practices).
2. When recruiting local/national and international staff, including short-term consultants, interns and
volunteers, careful hiring practices should include reference checks for all categories of employee.
Key Actions
• Reference checks should specifically include questions seeking
information about the candidate related to any prior acts,
personnel actions or criminal history.
• Careful reference checks can filter out those candidates with a
A21
history of exploitative behaviour.
3. Do not hire any person with a history of perpetrating any type of gender-based violence, including sexual
exploitation, sexual abuse or domestic violence.
Key Actions
• Human Resources must endeavour to increase the numbers of
women staff, including management and leadership positions.
• Identify, understand and address obstacles to employing women.
Consider the following ideas, depending on feasibility in the
setting:
o Meet with community leaders to discuss the importance of
having women work for the organization.
o Establish a day care or cooperative among mothers to share
child care
o Establish job-sharing arrangements.
o Provide arrangements for lunchtime meals for employees
and their families.
o Enroll new staff in literacy and numeracy training,
linking progress with increasing job responsibilities and
compensation.
o Hire husband-wife or brother-sister teams to fill positions.
Key Actions
• All personnel involved in recruitment and hiring must be held
accountable for their behaviour and practices.
• Checks must be put into place to ensure transparency in hiring
practices and that staff do not abuse their position of differential
power in the hiring process.
1. All humanitarian actors must agree to abide by the code of conduct and must sign a document to indicate
their agreement and commitment. Humanitarian organizations are responsible and accountable for
ensuring this occurs among all staff at all levels.
Key Actions
• All humanitarian organizations must have procedures in place to
A21
2. Each sector must establish systems of accountability for community members engaged in humanitarian
activities (e.g., teachers, food distributors, camp management committees, etc.). These community
members must understand and agree to abide by the code of conduct, sign an appropriate document and
be held accountable for her/his behaviour.
3. Inform all new and incoming staff about the code of conduct and standards for behaviour through
orientation and information sessions.
Key Actions
• Allow sufficient time and opportunity to discuss and clarify aspects
of the standards that staff may find confusing (A frequent staff
concern relates to the obligation to report suspicions of SEA.
Stress that the standards of conduct are non-negotiable and there
is a policy of zero tolerance for noncompliance.).
• The code(s) of conduct and any accompanying policies or
statements must be translated into local languages so that local/
national staff fully understand all aspects of these standards.
Key Actions
• Clear and transparent procedures must be in place for receiving
and following up on complaints.
• The safety, health and welfare of the survivor are the foremost
priority.
• At all times, preserve the anonymity of the complainant.
• Complainant must be consulted and kept informed of the progress
of the investigation and all actions taken.
• Referrals for support services for the complainant may be
indicated.
Key Actions
• All investigations must comply with gender and age-specific good
A21
practice as well as other standards outlined in the IASC Model
Complaints and Investigation Procedures and Guidance Related to
Sexual Abuse and Sexual Exploitation.
4. Designate a sexual exploitation and abuse Focal Point and an alternate among the staff.
Key Actions
• Focal points and managers must be trained on how to receive,
document and respond to complaints of SEA.
• At least one of these focal points must be a woman.
5. Inform all staff about complaints/reporting mechanisms for suspected sexual exploitation and abuse,
including contact persons/focal points.
Key Actions
• Inform about the right to protection against SEA.
• Inform about the complaints procedures and specifically how
to make a complaint, and to whom, and what they can expect
afterward.
• Inform about available survivor assistance, including
confidentiality of services.
7. Integrate record-keeping with documentation systems for other forms of sexual violence although
additional documentation may be needed within the organization in which the staff member is employed
(e.g., internal investigation notes, reports to headquarters).
Key Actions
• Confidential complaints mechanisms should be implemented in
close cooperation with other agencies and with the GBV Working
Group to avoid confusion or duplication and to simplify the
process for survivors.
• It is crucial that organizations work together in receiving and
investigating complaints. Note that some survivors may not
wish to - or be able to - contact the organization in which the
perpetrator is employed. Their only option to report the abuse may
be through another organization in the setting.
Key Actions
• Integrate SEA reporting mechanisms with the systems to prevent
and respond to all forms of sexual violence.
GBV Guidelines Sectoral Information Sheets
2. Establish regular focal point network meetings, at least once every two months.
Key Actions
• Share information about lessons learned and best practices.
• Never share information about cases that could jeopardize the
confidentiality of the complainant.
• Coordinate activities to prevent and respond to SEA.
• Provide support to delegated focal points and alternates.
3. Participants of focal point networks must never discuss details of cases/reports that are not involved
in investigative or disciplinary processes. This information must remain strictly confidential to protect
survivors/victims, witnesses and the alleged perpetrator.
6. Ensure availability and distribution of the IASC materials and other resources.
2. Incorporate strategies to prevent sexual violence (SV) in nutrition programmes at all stages of the project
cycle (including design, implementation, monitoring and follow-up), giving special attention to groups in
the community that are more vulnerable to SV.
Key Actions:
• Target nutrition and food aid to women- and child-headed
households.
• Give special attention to pregnant women and lactating mothers,
addressing their increased nutritional needs.
3. Involve women in the entire process of implementing nutrition strategies. Establish frequent and
consistent communication with women in order to understand the issues that need to be addressed and
resolved.
A21
Key Actions for women’s participation:
• The assessment and targeting process, especially in the
Key Actions:
• Ensure the household ration card is issued in a woman’s name.
• Encourage women to form collectives to determine contents of
food baskets.
• Conduct distributions at least twice per month to maintain
appropriate levels of nutrition and access to food.
1. Become familiar with protection and security issues related to sexual violence; participate in the
coordinated situation analysis.
Key Actions
• Identify high-risk areas in the setting: where sexual violence (SV)
occurs and where women and girls perceive safety and security
risks, etc.
• Identify factors in the setting that place women and children at
high risk of harm.
• Identify individuals who may be targeted for abuse.
• Assess and evaluate existing security response and legal follow-up
mechanisms.
• Identify relevant national laws and policies.
• Identify traditional systems in the community for problem-solving
A21
or justice.
• Identify availability of legal aid services for survivors.
• Identify assets and resources in the community, which may
contribute to providing protection/prevention and response to SV.
GBV Guidelines Sectoral Information Sheets
2. Build alliances and establish a network of contacts in-country among individuals, organizations,
institutions and groups that can contribute to protection from sexual violence.
Key Actions:
• Expand from contacts in the GBV Working Groups.
• Include police, armed forces, judiciary, traditional leaders,
women’s leaders, women’s groups, traditional healers, diplomats,
donors, peacekeepers, etc.
3. Coordinate with authorities and the GBV Working Group to establish strategies to remove or reduce
obstacles to arrests and prosecution. Consider the following:
Key Considerations:
• Police/security may lack information about relevant laws and
procedures.
• Lack of reporting (to police) by survivors.
• Impediments to prosecution, such as impunity, long distances to
courts, lack of transport and/or overnight accommodation for
witnesses.
• Peacekeeping presence may present an opportunity for capacity-
building and training with local authorities.
Key Actions:
• Establish coordination mechanisms and orient partners on
reporting and referral system and guiding principles for all actors.
• Compile and analyze data about SV incidents.
1. Encourage authorities to strengthen security, as well as law and order arrangements, in the affected areas.
Key Actions:
• Ensure there are adequate numbers of properly trained police and
security personnel who are accountable for their actions.
• Capacity-building measures for police.
2. Establish short-term security objectives and indicators for minimum prevention and response to sexual
A21
violence.
3. Establish strategies for improving security, combining a targeted, proactive presence around specific
hotspots’.
4. Advocate with police/security forces and promote confidence-building between police/security forces
and the community.
Key Actions:
• Increase numbers of female police.
• Meetings and information-sharing between police and the
community.
• Information sessions about laws and protections from police to
women and girls in the community.
• Regular contact and communication with the local authorities.
Key Foci:
• Potential consequences of SV.
• Survivors’ need for help and support, not blame and social stigma.
• How and where survivors can go for help that is confidential.
6. Provide security when survivors/victims report incidents to the police and/or security staff.
Key Actions:
• Always respect the confidentiality, rights, choices, dignity and
confidentiality of the survivor; involve her in all decisions.
• All interviews with the survivor must be conducted in private
spaces and, preferably, by female staff.
• Some survivors may want and need a safe place to go either
temporarily or for the longer term.
• Work in conjunction with cultural leaders, authorities and women’s
groups to counter the perception that survivors are culpable.
7. Establish mechanisms to maximize safety and security of all who provide help and assistance to survivors,
including humanitarian staff and community members.
A21
8. Monitor security to identify high-risk areas and security issues, within the constraints of the security
situation.
GBV Guidelines Sectoral Information Sheets
Key Actions:
• Consistently review SV data.
• Meet regularly with network of contacts to share information and
coordinate for security improvements.
• Consult members of the community, ensuring that women and
girls are fully included in private consultations.
9. Provide guidance to the GBV Working Group on how to prevent future incidents of SV: monitor and
analyze security through anecdotal information and reported data on SV.
Key Actions:
• Evaluate incidents and response actions, identify patterns and nature
of violations
o Assess acts of commission or acts of omission.
o Find out if there is a particular pattern connected with the
abuses, and gauge if there are any factors that may put people
more at risk.
o Clarify exactly who is responsible for these violations.
o Identify critical factors that facilitate violations
• Learn who is orchestrating, encouraging, permitting and colluding in
the perpetration of violations.
• Attempt to anticipate or predict perpetrators’ next steps.
1. Participate in a multi-sectoral, coordinated situational analysis and compile information relevant to legal
redress for SV (e.g., national laws, legal procedures and practices for sexual violence crimes, numbers and
circumstances of successful prosecutions, etc.).
2. Develop a sub-working group within the GBV Working Group related to legal redress for SV. Ensure
local representation, including women, in the sub-working group.
3. Designate personnel within the UN and/or humanitarian institutions to provide legal advice to the State
and direct legal assistance to survivors who wish to pursue legal justice for SV crimes. Ensure these
personnel participate in the sub-working group.
4. Designate members within the sub-working group responsible for tracking the State’s investigation and
resolution of SV cases.
5. Build networks with judges, prosecutors, police and traditional systems to ensure that existing laws relating
A21
to SV are upheld.
6. Wherever necessary, develop coordinated action to pressure states to ratify and/or implement the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and other
7. Designate members of the sub-working group to provide training on international and human rights as
they relate to prohibitions of rape and other forms of SV to community, police, national and traditional
courts, and national and international humanitarian actors.
1. Identify safety and security risks for women and girls that are relevant to water and sanitation systems to
ensure the location, design and maintenance programmes maximize safety and security of women and
girls.
Key Actions:
• Participate in a coordinated situational analysis to gather relevant
information about the community and situation related to sexual
violence (SV).
• Pay special attention to the needs of vulnerable groups of women
and girls, such as single female-headed households, adolescents,
unaccompanied girl children.
2. Mobilize women and men to participate in the location, design and maintenance of water and sanitation
facilities.
A21
Key Actions
• Do not let women be overburdened.
GBV Guidelines Sectoral Information Sheets
3. Locate water points in areas that are accessible and safe for all, with special attention to the needs of
women and children.
Key Actions
• Discuss the location of the pumps with all members of the
community.
• As a guide, no household should be more than 500 m from a water
point.
4. Design or adapt hand pumps and water-carrying containers for use by women and children.
5. In situations where water is rationed or pumped at given times, plan this in consultation with all users, but
especially with women.
Key Actions
• Times should be set which are convenient and safe for women and
others who have responsibility for collecting water.
• All users should be fully informed of when and where water is
available.
Key Actions
• Determine numbers, location, design, safety, appropriateness and
convenience of facilities in consultation with the users, particularly
women and adolescent girls.
• Facilities should be central, accessible and well-lit in order to
contribute to the safety of users.
• Bathing facilities should have doors with locks on the inside.
7. Design latrines in consultation with women and girls to maximize safety, privacy and dignity.
Key Actions
• Consider preferences and cultural habits in determining the type
of latrines to be constructed.
• Use sex-disaggregated data to plan the ratio of women’s cubicles
to men’s. A rough guide is 3:1.
• Install latrines with doors that lock from the inside.
• Location of latrines should ensure that women and girls feel - and
are - safe using them.
A21
• Communal latrines should be provided with lighting, or families
provided with torches.
9. Inform women and men about the maintenance and use of water and sanitation facilities.
Key Actions
• Women and men should be fully informed on how to repair
facilities and how to make/where to find spare parts.
• Determine timings of information sessions in consultation with
the intended users, particularly women, so as not to conflict with
their other responsibilities.
• Use/adapt information and promotional materials to ensure they
are culturally acceptable and accessible to all groups.
• Use participatory materials and methods that allow all groups to
plan and monitor their own hygiene improvements.
10. Maintain awareness of involvement of women and men in hygiene promotional activities and ensure
continuous sex balance on committees and among hygiene promoters.
Key Actions
• Ensure that women are not overburdened with the responsibility
for hygiene promotional activities or management of water and
sanitation facilities.
• Ensure that women and men have equitable influence in hygiene
promotional activities and that any benefits or incentives are
distributed equally among women and men.
Access
1. Information and awareness-raising about camp and security management are
provided equally to women, girls, boys and men
Gender Handbook Sectoral Information Sheets
A22
Gender Handbook Sectoral Information Sheets
A22
• food distribution points established as close to beneficiaries as possible
• weight of food packages manageable for women (e.g., 25 kg vs. 50 kg
bags, etc.)
2. The sector/cluster has a gender action plan, has developed and routinely
measures project-specific indicators based on the checklist provided in the IASC
Gender Handbook
A22
1. Women’s, girls’, boys’ and men’s access to services, as well as control over
productive resources, is routinely monitored through spot checks, discussion with
communities, etc.
2. The sector/cluster has a gender action plan, has developed and routinely
measures project-specific indicators based on the checklist provided in the IASC
Gender Handbook
Gender Handbook Sectoral Information Sheets
A22
4. Percentage of health facilities providing confidential care for survivors of sexual
violence according to the IASC Guidelines
5. Ratio of health care providers disaggregated by profession, level and sex
A22
1. Women and adolescent girls have equal access to livelihood programmes and
livelihood services as do men and adolescent boys
2. Women’s, girls’, boys’ and men’s access to livelihood programmes is routinely
monitored through spot checks, discussions with communities, etc.
A22
1. Women and men are involved in planning and implementing NFI selection and
distribution
2. Women and men are informed and aware of their individual entitlements; the
quantity and variety of items they should receive; and the place, day and time of
2. An equal number of women and men from the communities are trained on
nutrition programming
3. An equal number of women and men are employed in nutrition programmes
Actions to address GBV
1. Both women and men are included in the process of selecting a safe distribution
point
2. Food distribution is done by a sex-balanced team
3. ‘Safe spaces’ are created at the distribution points and ‘safe passage’ schedules
created for women and children heads of households
4. Special arrangements are made to safeguard women to and from the distribution
point (e.g., armed escort if necessary)
5. Security and instances of abuse are monitored
Targeted actions based on gender analysis
1. Unequal food distribution and nutrition rates within the household are addressed
through nutritional support as well as programmes to address underlying reasons
for discrimination and to empower those discriminated against
A22
Gender Handbook Sectoral Information Sheets
Training/capacity-building
1. Equal numbers of women and men are trained to provide guidance and timely
referrals regarding safety and groups with specific needs
Actions to address GBV
Gender Handbook Sectoral Information Sheets
A22
1. Equal opportunities exist for training for women, girls, boys and men in
construction skills training
2. Percentage of women and men trained in shelter construction
3. Percentage of women and men involved in shelter construction
1. Women and men are equally and meaningfully involved in decision-making and
programme design, implementation and monitoring
2. Women and men are involved in safe disposal of solid waste
Training/capacity-building
Gender Handbook Sectoral Information Sheets
1. Women and men are trained in the use and maintenance of facilities
2. Women and men are sensitized/trained to protect surface and groundwater
Actions to address GBV
1. Both women and men participate in the identification of safe and accessible sites
for water pumps and sanitation facilities
2. Facilities and collection points are monitored to ensure they are safe and
accessible (locks, lighting)
Targeted actions based on gender analysis
1. Unequal knowledge levels on hygiene and water management are addressed
through trainings
2. Women’s and men’s access to and control over resources for collecting/carrying
water, containers and storage facilities are monitored and inequities are addressed
3. Discriminatory practices hindering women’s participation in water management
groups are addressed through empowerment programmes
Monitoring and evaluation based on sex- and age-disaggregated data
1. Sex- and age-disaggregated data on programme coverage are collected, analyzed
and routinely reported on
2. Plans are developed and implemented to address any inequalities and ensure
access and safety for all of the target population
Coordinate actions with all partners
1. Actors in your sector liaise with actors in other sectors to coordinate on gender
issues
2. The sector/cluster has a gender action plan, has developed and routinely
measures project-specific indicators based on the checklist provided in the IASC
Gender Handbook
Ignoring or being blind to these different needs can have serious implications for the protection and survival of people caught up
in humanitarian crises.
What is expected of you in your role as Cluster/Sector lead in the field?
Sector [cluster] leads in the field have a particular responsibility for ensuring that humanitarian actors working in their sectors
remain actively engaged in addressing cross cutting concerns such as gender equality. Experience of recent crises suggests
that these important dimensions to ensuring appropriate responses have too frequently been ignored.
Sector/cluster leads at the country level are accountable to the Humanitarian Coordinator for facilitating a process aimed at
ensuring the following:
Ensure integration of agreed priority cross-cutting issues in sectoral needs assessment, analysis, planning, monitoring
and response (e.g., age, diversity, environment, gender, HIV/AIDS and human rights); contribute to the development
A23
of appropriate strategies to address these issues; ensure gender sensitive programming and promote gender equality;
ensure that the needs, contributions and capacities of women and girls as well as men and boys are addressed.
Conflict and disaster affects women, girls, boys and men differently, and they have different coping strategies. To mainstream
gender equality programming in emergencies, it is essential to understand the roles, capacities and constraints of women, girls,
boys and men, and the power relations between them. Their differing needs and capabilities must be identified to make sure
all have access to services and information, and can participate in the planning and implementation of relief programmes. Go
through the ADAPT and ACT Collectively steps to ensure your sector is taking gender issues seriously.
Section Six: Annexes 223
Cross-cutting Issue Gender Equality Programming
Analyse: Analyse the impact of the humanitarian crisis on
Framework for Gender Equality
women, girls, boys and men. Be certain, for example, that all needs Programming
assessments include gender issues in the information gathering and Analyse gender differences.
analysis phases, and that women, girls, boys and men are consulted Design services to meet needs of all.
in assessment, monitoring and evaluation processes. Access ensured for all.
Design Services: Design services to meet the needs of women Participate equally.
and men equally. Each sector should review the way they work and Train women and men equally.
make sure women and men can benefit equally from the services, for and
example there are separate latrines for women and men; hours for Address GBV in sector programmes.
trainings, food or non-food items distribution are set so that everyone Collect, analyse and report sex/age
can attend, etc. disaggregated data.
Ensure access: Make sure that women and men can access Target actions based on a gender
services equally. Sectors should continuously monitor who is using analysis.
the services and consult with the community to ensure all are Coordinate actions with all partners.
accessing the service.
ADAPT and ACT
Ensure participation: Ensure women, girls, boys and men Collectively to ensure gender equality
participate equally in the design, implementation, monitoring and
evaluation of humanitarian response, and that women are in decision-
making positions. If it is problematic to have women in committees, put in place mechanisms to ensure their voices are brought
to the committees
A23
Train: Ensure that women and men benefit equally from training or other capacity-building initiatives offered by the sector
actors. Make certain that women and men have equal opportunities for capacity building and training, including opportunities for
work or employment.
Gender Tip Sheet for Cluster/Sector Leads
Address gender-based violence: Make sure that all sectors take specific actions to prevent and/or respond to gender-
based violence. The IASC Guidelines for Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Settings should be used by all
as a tool for planning and coordination.
Disaggregate data by age and sex: Collect and analyse all data concerning the humanitarian response by age and
sex breakdown, with differences analysed and used to develop a profile of at-risk populations and how their needs are being
met by the assistance sector.
Targeted Actions: Based on the gender analysis, make sure that women, girls, boys and men are targeted with specific
actions when appropriate. Where one group is more at-risk than others, special measures should be taken to protect that group.
Examples would be safe spaces for women and measures to protect boys from forced recruitment.
Coordinate: Set up gender support networks to ensure coordination and gender mainstreaming in all areas of humanitarian
work. Sector actors should be active in coordination mechanisms.
Section A in the IASC Gender Handbook in Humanitarian Action includes four chapters covering the basics of
gender equality, including sample activities and indicators for the ADAPT and ACT framework represented above – as well
as specific chapters on participation, coordination and protection.
Tips, checklists and case examples for integrating gender into the clusters can be found in Section B of the IASC Gender
Handbook in Humanitarian Action. For each cluster, see the following pages in the handbook:
Gender and Camp Coordination and Camp Management in Emergencies .....................................41
Gender and Education in Emergencies ...........................................................................................................49
Gender and Food Issues in Emergencies . .....................................................................................................57
a. Gender and Food Security in Emergencies.........................................................................................59
b. Gender and Food Distribution in Emergencies..................................................................................65
Integration of gender equality and GBV programming into the work planning process
“Gender was identified as one of 4 cross-cutting issues to be incorporated into sector priorities and objectives. The
mainstreaming process was as consultative and inclusive as possible; the gender adviser collaborated not only with the sector
leads in each of the states, but with many of their implementing partners. The structure of the mainstreaming methodology
emphasized creating sector-specific reference worksheets itemizing tangible, realistic, practical strategies which could
subsequently be incorporated into the Workplan project sheets, without creating any additional work or parallel workplan
structures for the sectors. Though the development of the gender mainstreaming and GBV-prevention strategies proved to be
most challenging for those sectors not traditionally associated with a protection mandate (particularly WASH and Food Security/
A23
Livelihoods), it was these sectors that were the most innovative in their approaches for gender mainstreaming and GBV-
prevention. Actors’ understanding of the strategies and activities increased with the provision of concrete and tangible examples
(activities that mitigated violence against women seemed more comprehensible and practical than general strategies such as
The IASC Gender Handbook: Women, Girls, Boys and Men – Different
Needs Equal Opportunities (IASC, 2006). The Handbook provides humanitarian field
practitioners with a basic understanding of gender equality programming in humanitarian settings
as well as specific activities for the different sectors of humanitarian response. It has been
produced under the auspices of the Cluster Approach, the different clusters producing the chapters
relevant to their work, making the final product an IASC-wide tool.
Available on http://humanitarianinfo.org/iasc/gender
A23
Gender Tip Sheet for Cluster/Sector Leads
Background
In 2007 and 2008, Mozambique has experienced several humanitarian crises that have required an
emergency response from government institutions together with national and international organizations.
When disaster strikes, humanitarian actors move quickly to save lives, meet basic needs and protect
survivors. In this rush to provide a humanitarian response, vulnerable groups, especially women and
children and chronically ill people, risk being overlooked. The level of gender-based violence, including
sexual violence, tends to increase in emergency situations, as does the risk of children being harmed,
abused or neglected. Furthermore, the perpetrators of sexual and gender-based violence are sometimes
the humanitarian workers on whom the affected population depends to assist and protect them. It is
thus of utmost importance to provide guidance to actors involved in emergencies to prevent protection
A24
violations from occurring in emergency situations and when they do, to respond to the needs of the victim
as rapidly and effectively as possible. Also mechanisms need to be in place to ensure that people who are
too ill or weak to acquire food and materials that are rightfully theirs are being assisted.
GBV FP ToR-Mozambique
As Save the Children, UNICEF and UNFPA wish to strengthen the capacity of actors involved in Mozambican
emergencies in terms of Child Protection and Gender-Based Violence, a training event was organised in
Maputo, in August 2007. A similar training event was also rolled out to the eight most emergency-prone
provinces between November 2007 and April 2008.
One outcome of the Maputo training was the establishment of Child Protection and Gender-based Violence
focal points for each of the clusters. This was viewed as a way of ensuring that child protection and gender-
based violence checks and controls would be integrated into all clusters. In 2008, two additional protection
elements have been included into the focal points ToR which are (i) advocating for the integration of
HIV prevention, mitigation and care; and (ii) the promotion of the Secretary General’s Bulletin on Special
Measures for Protection from Sexual Abuse and Exploitation.
Timeframe
The protection focal point attends all the relevant cluster meetings and ensures that a substitute is sent
if he/she is not able to participate. For example, a protection focal point in the WASH Cluster attends all
the WASH Cluster meetings or ensures that a substitute is able to participate. During emergencies, there
are cluster meetings several times a week whereas during the remainder of the year, clusters are either
dormant or meet on a monthly or bi-monthly basis.
The protection focal point will make a commitment to the relevant cluster for one year.
Objective
To ensure that child protection, gender-based violence and HIV are integrated into the cluster work plan
and activities during an emergency and during the remainder of the year (if the relevant cluster is meeting).
• Focal Points represent the interests of children, women and men in terms of child protection and
gender-based violence in the relevant cluster.
• Focal Points promote the prevention of HIV and protection of People Living with HIV and/or AIDS
in the relevant cluster through cluster activities.
• Focal Points will apply a child protection/gender-based violence ‘lens’ to each decision taken by
the relevant cluster. It will consider how the decision will impact people living with, or vulnerable
to, HIV. A check-list has been developed to this purpose and is attached to this ToR.
• If the Focal Point has protection colleagues who attend the Protection Cluster, the Focal Point will
liaise accordingly to share information and communicate child protection/gender-based violence
and HIV issues between the relevant cluster and the Protection Cluster.
• The Focal Point will be expected to disseminate tools of relevance for child protection, gender-
based violence and HIV to members of the relevant cluster.
• The focal point will be expected to disseminate and promote the Secretary General’s Bulletin on
Special Measures for Protection from Sexual Abuse and Exploitation to cluster members.
• The Focal Point will ensure that child protection, gender-based violence and HIV are integrated
into all debates and initiatives undertaken in the relevant cluster.
• The Focal Point will maintain regular contact with Protection cluster.
• The Focal Point is always welcome to attend the protection cluster meetings and might be
specifically invited to do so on occasion.
A24
Support
• A ½ day training on Child Protection, Gender-based Violence and HIV in emergencies will be held
GBV FP ToR-Mozambique
once a year.
• Specific follow-up meetings every 4 months. The purpose of these meetings is to give continuity
to the focal points’ work, share information about HIV, Gender-based Violence and Child
Protection in emergencies, as well as give room for discussion amongst the focal points. This will
be co-ordinated by the Protection Cluster.
• Continuous support when needed from Save the Children, UNICEF, UNFPA and UNAIDS through
technical support in the area of Child Protection, Gender-based Violence and HIV.
A25
anyone anything in return for food.
6. Support and protect food security of HIV-affected and at-risk households and communities.
7. Food should be kept in hygienic condition and it should be explained how to prepare and
store dry rations.
HEALTH
1. Make sure that all the affected population has access to health facilities including: orphans,
child-headed households, street children, young girls, people with disabilities and elderly
people.
2. Make sure that women have the same access as men to basic health services (including
delivery services, reproductive health services, emergency obstetric care services, access
to Anti Retroviral treatment and Prevention of Mother-to-Child transmission)
3. Make sure that all the affected population knows where the health services are and how
to access them.
4. Make sure that women victims of sexual violence receive appropriate and confidential
treatment (including the option of emergency contraception, treatment for Sexually
Transmitted Diseases, PEP)
5. Women, girls, boys and men have access to sanitary materials and condoms
6. Groups of adolescents and youth are trained to give their families and communities
information on health and good hygiene behaviour.
7. Health workers should be sensitive to the psychological needs of the affected population
8. Make sure that people with HIV/AIDS receive appropriate and confidential care.
WASH
A25
1. Make sure that safe water use and good hygiene practices exist and are promoted.
2. Make sure that children and adolescents are involved in water & sanitation campaigns
to pass the message about clean, safe water and adequate sanitary habits on to other
children and to their own families.
GBV FP Cluster Checklist-Mozambique
3. Ensure that water and sanitation activists are balanced in terms of gender and age.
4. Advocate for the inclusion of HIV information when training water and sanitation activists.
5. Make sure that all these people have access to safe water use: people with disabilities and
illnesses, children, pregnant and lactating women and elderly people.
6. Communal latrine and bathing cubicles for women and children are in safe locations
identified by both men and women, are culturally appropriate, provide privacy, are
adequately illuminated and are accessible for those with disabilities.
7. A community protection structure, including women, should protect girls, minority groups,
etc., after dark so they can feel safe and access services.
8. Small children should be provided with a potty and taught how to use it.
9. Long queues and other burdens pose a risk to women and children and should be avoided.
Water collection containers should not be too big for children or elderly to carry and there
should be sufficient taps to ensure there are not long queues.
10. Make sure that adolescent girls, women, vulnerable children, PLHA have sufficient sanitary
materials, soap or washing materials.
11. Make sure that numbers related to the affected population includes sex (male and female)
and age.
AT ALL
IMMEDIATE RESPONSE
A26
Refer survivor to available medical clinic or facility with capacity
for appropriate clinical management/post rape care
ADDITIONAL LIFE-
SAVING SUPPORT
emotional support services
Benefits Consequences
available to her. Inform her of
- Document cases - May increase her profile
benefits AND consequences.
- Hold perpetrators accountable - Compromise her
- Assist in later court proceedings confidentiality and safety IF SHE CHOOSES
- Important for evidence gathering - Possible inappriopriate
- Provide support in interaction with treatment by officials
police Refer her to the emotional
IF SHE CHOOSES support and psychosocial
activities at women's centres,
child-friendly spaces,
Report to UNDP, UNAMID HR, UNPOL or FCPU as outreach programmes, or
appropriate. Avoid multiple interviews. Only information traditional mechanisms of
necessary for the service requested should be gathered. support available.
NORTH DARFUR
GBV WORKING GROUP
Overall coordination of GBV programming and support structures in North Darfur is coordinated by
UNFPA. This role may be taken on by another agency or organization, depending on the location and
context.
When a survivor comes to any Agency or NGO staff member, service center or community member and says
that she/he is a victim of sexual violence you must act immediately. Prior to following the steps listed below,
always remember these key points:
• At all times in the referral process, prioritize survivor and staff safety and security.
• NO ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION
OF THE SURVIVOR, IF AND WHEN APPROPRIATE.
Darfur Referral Protocol Narrative
The primary role of the ‘focal point’ is to provide the survivor with support and to inform her of her
choices and available resources.
1. Assess urgent medical needs. If an emergency medical situation, immediately refer the survivor to the
nearest medical clinic or hospital. Otherwise, keep survivor comfortable in safe and secure setting.
Only provide medical treatment to ensure stabilization.
2. Survivor information (including name, address, details of the incident, etc.) will not be necessary at
this point. DO NOT record any information on the incident or write anything down without the
permission of the survivor.
3. Once the survivor is comfortable and has given her consent, inform her of available health resources
and the benefits to seeking health care. If the survivor is under 18, she must be accompanied by an
adult, and, if possible, a member of her family. Provide a safe and confidential space in which the
survivor can be treated or support her in accessing medical services.
4. If she chooses, refer the survivor to the available medical clinic or facility with capacity for clinical
management/post-rape care.
The respect and care you show as health and service providers is important and can contribute greatly to the
survivor’s healing process.
If and when the survivor chooses psychosocial and/or legal support, follow these steps:
PSYCHOSOCIAL SUPPORT:
1. Inform the survivor of available psychosocial and emotional support services available to her. Inform
her of both the benefits and challenges to pursuing emotional support.
2. Refer the survivor to the emotional support and psychological activities (such as emotional support,
A27
literacy classes, RH classes, and income generation) at women’s centres, child- friendly spaces,
outreach programmes or traditional mechanisms of support.
1. Inform the survivor of the access she has to legal and justice resources, including both the possible
benefits and possible consequences of pursuing legal action.
If or when the survivor chooses to have her case documented (UNAMID HR or CP, CivPol):
1. The survivor may agree to have her case documented without being willing to report to law
enforcement authorities. These are two different processes, with two different objectives.
3. All information will be kept confidential. Reports should NOT have the name or any other
information that can be used to identify the survivor. At no time should the identity of the
survivor be disclosed without her consent.
A number of GBV-related training resources have been developed by UNICEF, IRC, Raising Voices, Oxfam
and others working on GBV and should be used as the basis of training.
different types of
violence
• Define gender-based violence
GBV Training Topics
A28
• Identify two psychological after-effects and describe
survivor needs in relation to them
• Identify two health outcomes and describe survivor
These messages were developed by the GBV Working Group. They are intended for anyone who
comes into contact with GBV survivors in their work. They could be government, NGO or UN staff
from any discipline- psychosocial, health, policing, legal/justice. The information here is very basic
and does not replace training for working with survivors of GBV. It is intended to give survivors
basic information that will help them get to services that can help them further.
About health
• “It is very important for you to get medical care after a sexual assault, as soon as possible.”
• “It is possible to get medication to prevent pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections, and
other harmful diseases, in addition to treating injuries.”
o “The medication to prevent pregnancies must be taken as soon as possible, within
5 days3 of the incident. ”
o “There is medication to prevent HIV. This must be taken as soon as possible,
within 72 hours/3 days of the incident.”
A29
• “If the incident happened more than 5 days ago, it is still important for you to seek medical
care.”
• “I can help you find a health clinic that can give you the health treatment you need and
answer your questions.”4
About legal/justice
• “If you are interested in seeking justice or reporting to the police, there are groups that can
help you report your case and get a lawyer. It is helpful and important to get advice before
reporting to the police.”
• “If you think you want to report the crime to the police, you will need a Form 8. You can fill
in the Form 8 first and then decide whether to report or not. Filling in the form doesn’t mean
you have to report, but will help you if you do. If you have questions about this, I can try to
help you get answers.”
About safety
• “Do you feel in danger or need help with safety?”
1
This information sheet focuses on sexual violence/rape, but it is relevant to survivors of all types of gender-based violence
(GBV).
2
It is OK if you don’t have all the information! The important thing is to ask questions to get the information the survivor
needs, and then give it to her immediately.
3
Emergency contraception to prevent pregnancy is most effective the sooner it is taken (within 72 hours is best). However, it
can be taken up to 120 hours (5 days) after the incident. Reference: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs244/en/
4
Not all health clinics are prepared to provide GBV survivors with post-rape care. Make sure you send the survivor to a clinic
that can give her the right treatment. Contact UNFPA for information about health clinics that provide this treatment in your
area.
5
Psychosocial support and counselling services are critical in helping survivors heal after the trauma of rape and return to a
normal life. If these services are available in your area, be sure to help the survivor contact them.
Available services
• Different services and resources are available in different locations in Darfur. It is important
to know what resources are available in the area where you are working.
• Check whether a referral pathway for GBV is available for the area. This can indicate what
services are available and who is there to respond.
• If you do not know what services are available, contact UNFPA for information. They can help
you find the right services to refer the survivor to in that area.
Questions?
• UNFPA has information about what services are available in different areas in Darfur. Contact
UNFPA for more information.
• Contact UNDP for information about free legal services for survivors of GBV and the telephone
number for the nearest lawyer in the Legal Aid Network (LAN).
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
The guiding principles on gender-based violence are understood and used by all staff
THE COMMUNITY
Women and men leaders, influential community members and any other interested people actively participate
in programmed planning, monitoring and evaluation – including decisions, activities, meetings, discussions
and training events
The community establishes and maintains volunteer networks for crisis response, peer counselling and
advocacy, community education and awareness-raising. NGOs, UNHCR, and host government authorities
support these efforts through regular training and ongoing assistance
PREVENTION
A30
Awareness campaigns promote changes in community attitudes, knowledge and behavior concerning gender
Multi-sectoral actors continuously assess risk factors and review incident data to identify and resolve specific
contributing factors to gender-based violence in the setting
and issues
Security workers are present, especially after dark and in high-risk areas
Designing communication materials can be fun and exciting; it need not be a daunting task. The following are
several key ideas that can help you develop engaging, positive and effective communication materials.
KEY IDEAS
Maintain the dignity of the characters
When creating communication materials about violence against women, it is tempting to use images that show
women being abused. While sometimes this may be necessary (particularly in booklets), this approach needs
to be used carefully, if at all. Avoid showing women in undignified positions (e.g., naked, laying on the ground,
in the middle of experiencing rape, etc.). Explicit images of acts of violence show women in powerless and
exposed situations and, while they may accurately reflect reality, they are rarely effective in helping change
people’s attitudes.
Similarly, avoid showing men being highly aggressive or violent; these are undignified portrayals of men.
Women and men viewing explicit images such as these rarely want to identify with the characters or the issue
that is being represented. Many people may feel ashamed to look at the image and, as a result, will either ignore
it or make jokes to diminish feelings of shame and embarrassment. The use of explicit images can further
marginalize the issue, keeping it taboo instead of encouraging people to discuss it. Try instead to maintain the
dignity of the characters by showing women and men as reasonable and thoughtful characters who are able to
A31
make positive decisions.
Steps
1. With a small group (e.g., staff members, community volunteers/members, resource persons, etc.),
brainstorm specific topics and issues you want to address in the material, record them on a flipchart.
2. Discuss the ideas as a group. Ask yourselves:
• Which are most compelling?
• Which are most appropriate for the audience?
• Which should be avoided?
3. In a smaller group (no more than four), further discuss the group brainstorm and discussion. Decide
which ideas are most appropriate for the current communication material. Make sure to save the other
interesting ideas, as you may want to use them later.
4. With this smaller group, brainstorm images and words for the communication material. For many people,
it helps to make pencil sketches (even of stick people) to get a sense of what type(s) of image(s) you may
use. Note: when designing booklets, you may choose to first develop a general outline of the story and
then add detail and images after.
5. Once you have an idea, discuss it with an artist. Get her/his feedback on the design and layout. You may
choose to show your pencil sketches. Note: when designing murals, you may want to show the artist the
proposed site for the mural as this may affect the types of image(s) used.
6. Once you and the artist have discussed the communication material, ask for a pencil prototype. It is best
A31
to give the artist a general sense of what you imagine the material to look like before the pencil sketch is
started, this can save lots of time later on. Give feedback on the prototype and ask her/him to make the
appropriate changes.
7. Pre-test the design with members of the primary audience. Consider the suggested changes and
Guidelines on Developing Communication Materials
incorporate feedback as you feel is appropriate. If the changes are significant, you may have to go through
a second, detailed pre-test.
8. Discuss the changes with the artist and supervise through all stages of drawing. Make sure you check the
final pencil design before the ink/color is applied. This can save considerable time and money!
Language
Does your communication material:
avoid blaming or accusations?
use language that is informal and familiar to the community?
have a design that is accessible to low-literacy viewers?
use language and images that are thought-provoking but not confrontational?
use language that is simple and straightforward?
make provocative statements or ask provocative questions to the viewer?
keep language as non-technical as possible?
Design
Does your communication material:
have information organized on the page (not too crowded or wordy)?
have large enough writing to be read at a distance?
use an attention-grabbing caption, slogan or question in a prominent place to help viewers get the main
idea?
use creative and easy to read fonts?
avoid using all capital letters and underlining?
use bright and vibrant colors?
use a consistent style?
identify your organization’s contact information and logo?
A31
Guidelines on Developing Communication Materials
Problem Definition
ASSESSMENT
M
O IMPACT P
Data/ N MEASUREMENT L Goals
Reports/ I R A Objectives
T E N
Analysis of O N Activities
V
Indicators R I I Indicators
I S N
N E G
G Proposals
A33
Funding
IMPLEMENTATION
1
Adapted from GBV Technical Support Project, RHRC Consortium, JSI Research and Training Project
Section Six: Annexes 245
Reporting and interpreting data on sexual violence from
conflict-affected countries
THE “DOS AND DON’TS”
Introduction
Information on the nature and scope of sexual violence during and immediately after conflict is
increasingly demanded by governments, NGOs, UN bodies (such as the Security Council) and
humanitarian workers. When collected, analysed and reported correctly, data on sexual violence can
serve many purposes, including drawing political attention to the issue and mobilizing resources for
comprehensive gender-based violence (GBV) prevention and response programmes. Data can also help
shape the mandates of international peacekeepers and rule of law actors. This Note is intended to assist
staff from UN Country Teams and Integrated Missions to improve data collection, analysis and reporting
on sexual violence in conflict. Any data collected on sexual violence must respect established ethical and
safety principles, such as security, confidentiality, anonymity, informed consent, safety and protection
from retribution, and protection of the data itself (see Key Resources).
A34
Dos and Don’ts for collecting, analysing and reporting on sexual violence
a.General
o Do seek advice from data experts to agree on what information to collect, share and report and how to do
Reporting and Interpreting Data on Sexual Violence
B. Analysing data
o Do examine how the data match other information coming from the field and consider how contextual
factors influence data quality.
o Do assess the quality of the data. Have the data been collected and analysed in methodologically sound
ways? Are they generalizable to a larger population? If so, to which population?
C. Reporting
o Do keep in mind the audience and possible use. If the data are being shared with the media, donors or
policy-makers, make sure that guidance is offered on the interpretation of the data. Briefing notes may help.
o Do provide the context for all data reported. If known, and safe to do so, provide information on the
camps/clinics/districts from where cases are reported. Be specific, e.g., “reported cases from x number of
health facilities”.
o Do provide a comprehensive description of the incident as long as this cannot be linked back to
individual survivors (precise date and location, information on the victims and perpetrators, ethnicity, age,
sex should be included when safe to do so)
o Do provide additional information that may have contributed to changes in the number of reported
cases. For example, more services available, public information campaigns, upsurge in violent attacks.
Whenever possible, information on when incidents took place should be collected and the information
reported along with aggregated numbers.
o Do label all tables, charts and maps appropriately to avoid being taken out of context and clearly state the
sources for any data cited.
o Don’t share data that may be linked back to an individual or group of individuals.
o Don’t take data at face value: assess original sources, including their quality/reliability.
o Don’t assume that reported data on sexual violence or trends in reports represent actual prevalence
and trends in the extent of sexual violence.
June 2008
246 Section Six: Annexes
Data Sources on Sexual Violence
A. Case Reports
Case reports on sexual violence are often collected by health service providers, social workers, police, courts or
humanitarian/human rights workers. In addition to specific descriptions of the nature of the crime, case reports
include information on who reported the case, when s/he reported and to whom, the perpetrator(s), the place and
time the incident took place and the survivor’s support network.
A34
to reduce stigma and alert to services; if not contextualized, an increase may be misinterpreted as
representing a sudden increase in sexual violence incidence.
o Data on case reports may combine cases from multiple years, obscuring the magnitude of the
problem. There is often a time lapse between the time a sexual violence crime occurs and when it is
B. Case Narratives
Case narratives are first-person accounts, which detail personal experiences of sexual violence. Case narratives
are generally collected by journalists.
June 2008
Section Six: Annexes 247
ETHICAL AND SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS
for researching, documenting and monitoring sexual violence in emergencies
A major challenge to addressing sexual violence is the absence of data on the nature and extent of the
problem. Sexual violence is usually underreported even in well-resourced and stable situations. During
emergencies, it is unlikely that there will be any reliable data about sexual violence. In most situations
planning for prevention and response to sexual violence will be based on anecdotal evidence obtained
through a variety of sources. Although current projects are being tested to increase the reliability of
reported data, rarely if ever is reported data a reliable source for understanding the nature and
extent of sexual violence in emergencies.
Data on sexual violence in emergency settings may be collected for a number of reasons and to support
various activities including: needs assessments and situation analyses; as testimonies for human rights
documentation and/or for criminal justice purposes; human rights monitoring and protection; research
on sexual violence in emergencies; to document incidence of sexual violence in the context of providing
direct services for survivors; monitoring and evaluation of interventions; and health surveys (especially
those focusing on reproductive health or HIV/AIDS).
The highly sensitive nature of sexual violence poses a unique set of challenges for any data-gathering
activity that touches on this issue. A range of ethical and safety issues must be considered and addressed
prior to the commencement of any such inquiry. Failure to do so can result in harm to the physical,
psychological and social well-being of those who participate and can even put lives at risk. It is essential
therefore to ensure that the case for collecting data is legitimate. Furthermore, when collecting and using
information about sexual violence, it must be done in such a way so as to avoid further harm to those who
are part of the process.
A35
The purpose of, rationale for and intended end use of the data to be collected, as well as the methodology
and target audience, should always be clearly defined and justified prior to engaging in any information-
gathering exercise. Questions that project planners should consider when planning and designing a data
collection activity include:
Basic care and support for survivors must be available locally before commencing any activity
that may involve individuals disclosing information about their experiences of sexual violence.
At a minimum, basic care and support includes medical care (treatment for injuries, prevention of disease
and unwanted pregnancy), emotional support (as outlined in the IASC Guidelines for GBV interventions,
Action Sheet 8.3, number 2) and protection from further violence (e.g., provision of options for safe shelter,
police investigation). Good practice dictates that those persons wishing to engage in sexual violence data
collection should either already represent or be affiliated with a social- service-providing agency. If the
information collection involves children, basic care and support must include services designed to meet
the needs of children.
Anyone providing information about sexual violence must give informed consent before
participating in the data-gathering activity.
The role of informed consent is to ensure that respondents are aware of and understand the purpose of the
data-collection exercise, the procedures that will be followed during the course of the exercise, the risks
and the benefits to themselves of participating, and also their rights, including the right to refuse to answer
specific questions or to take part in sections of the interview. The informed consent process is two way, and
goes far beyond simply providing a form for participants to read and sign.
All members of the data collection team must be carefully selected and receive relevant and
sufficient specialized training and ongoing support.
Every aspect of information collection about sexual violence in emergencies is sensitive. All members of
A35
the information gathering team may encounter a range of safety and ethical issues throughout the process
and must be prepared and trained accordingly. The composition of the information gathering team in any
sexual violence inquiry will vary depending on many factors. In some cases the team might include a team
leader, supervisors, interviewers, researchers, translators, information-gatherers, drivers, data entry staff,
Additional safeguards must be put into place if children (i.e., those under 18 years) are to be the
subject of information gathering.
Particular care should be taken when engaging in an information-collection activity that involves children
as respondents. Every effort must be made to anticipate and prevent or minimize harmful consequences.
The following suggested good practice guidance should be considered:
□□ Seek advice from experts in collecting information from and working with children, as well as
people familiar with the culture and the setting in which the inquiry is to take place.
□□ Draw on the emerging body of literature and experience regarding how best to work with children
and young people.
□□ Consult with community members and parents, guardians or caregivers to anticipate all possible
consequences for children involved in the information-gathering process.
□□ Advise children, as well as their parents, guardians or caregivers, of the referral services and
protection mechanisms that are available to them.
□□ Be prepared to deal with very serious or complex issues and needs that may arise during the
information-gathering process.
Purpose: To audit__________ camp to assess and address risk factors regarding protection of women
and girls from gender-based violence.
___________________________________________________________________________
If no, do not indicate anything in the boxes to the right and skip to question #7.
If yes, ask the following:
Do the single mothers and their children you know live with people who are not part of their own
family? Indicate answer in box.
(To assess female-headed households accommodated separately)
4. Do the single mothers you know in this camp all live in a special area in the camp?
If yes, ask the following:
Do you think this reduces the risk of violence for women? Describe very briefly below in the
comments section.)
(To assess whether female-headed households are located together and to assess people’s
perceptions about whether this improves safety)
Registration
5. Are married women in this camp registered separately from their husbands?
6. Are girls or single women without family members registered as individuals?
Facilities
7. Are men’s and women’s latrines and bathhouses separated?
8. Are women’s latrines and bath houses easily accessible to women and girls?
9. Are women’s latrines and bath houses secure for women and girls?
Don’t
B. SERVICES & FACILITIES YES NO
Know
Food, NFI and Fuel
10. What is the food scale that your household receives? Total_____________(Take total amount
and divide by people in household.)
Is this enough for your household?
(To assess whether full food rations distributed regularly and to assess perceptions about
adequacy of food allotment)
11. Is food distributed specifically to women (as opposed to male family members)?
12. Do you think food should be distributed specifically to women? (Add comments below.)
1
October 2007. Adapted from materials developed by Sophie Read-Hamilton and Uganda Camp Safety Audit
250 Section Six: Annexes
13. Are women involved in food distribution?
14. Are women involved in monitoring food distribution?
15. Are NFI distributed specifically to women?
16. Do you think NFI should be distributed specifically to women? (if necessary, add comments
below)
17. Are firewood and charcoal collection points safely and easily accessible to women?
Water
18. Is adequate water available in this camp?
19. Are women involved in water distribution and monitoring?
20. Are water collection points safely and easily accessible to women?
Security
21. Are there known danger zones in the camps or near the camps where women and girls are at
increased risk for violence? If yes, describe below in comments section.
22. Are there security personnel patrolling outside this camp? If no, indicate at right and then skip
to question 29.
23. Does this camp have a protection focal point?
If yes, name which organization(s) have a protection focal point below:
24. Do camp watch teams patrol inside this camp? If no, indicate at right and skip to question 33.
If yes, ask the following:
How many people in a camp watch team are regularly on patrol at the same time inside this
camp? Total on patrol at the same time__________
A36
25. Are women represented in the camp watch teams patrolling inside this camp?
26. If you heard about a case of sexual violence against a woman or girl occurring inside or near
the camp, would you report the case? If no, skip to next question.
11. Are there known danger zones in the camps or near the camps where women and girls are at
increased risk for violence? If yes, describe below in comments section.
12. Does this camp have a protection focal point?
If yes, name which organization(s) have a protection focal point below:
13. Are camp members aware of how to report a case of sexual violence against a woman or girl
living in the camp?
If yes, ask the following: Who would they report the case to?
Survivor Support
14. Are health workers in this camp’s health center trained to treat women and girls who have
experienced sexual violence?
15. Are there female health workers available in the health center to treat women and girls who
have experienced sexual violence?
16. Are there other services available in this camp to assist women who have experienced
violence?
If yes, ask the following: What services are available?_____________________
Don’t
C. DECISION MAKING YES NO
Know
17. Is there an interagency GBV Committee in the camp?
18. Does camp management participate in this Committee?
19. Are women represented in Camp Management Committees?
D. COMMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS
Don’t
A. CAMP LAYOUT YES NO
Know
Facilities
1. Are men’s and women’s latrines and bathhouses separated enough?
2. Are women’s latrines and bath houses safely accessible to women and girls?
3. Are women’s latrines and bath houses secure for women and girls?
B. SERVICES
Water
4. Is adequate water available in this camp?
5. Are camp women involved in water distribution and monitoring?
6. Are water collection points safely and easily accessible to women?
Security
7. Are there known danger zones in the camps or near the camps where women and girls are at
increased risk for sexual violence? If yes, describe below in comments section.
C. DECISION-MAKING
8. Do women participate in water sanitation committees?
A36
D. COMMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS
Survivor Support
10. Have you heard about or participated in community education activities that are focused on
violence against women and girls?
C. DECISION-MAKING
11. Are the Interagency GBV Coordination meetings held at this camp?
If yes, ask the following:
How many women?_______________
12. Do representatives from the Camp Management Committee participate in Interagency GBV
Coordination meetings?
13. Do women’s community representatives participate in GBV coordination meeting?
D. COMMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS
A36
Camp Safety Audit
PART VII. To ask the Health Center Representative
Position (Job Title) of Health Center Representative interviewed: _____________
2. Are there female health workers available in the health center to treat women and girls who
have experienced violence?
3. Are there other services available in this camp to assist women who have experienced
violence? If yes, ask the following:
What services are available?
B. COMMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS
Community profile
Information needed Sample questions
□□ Community • What is the perception of gender-based violence among the refugee
knowledge, population? Are the victims perceived as responsible? What stigma is attached
A37
attitudes and that may cause attacks to go unreported? What other reasons may cause non-
practices about reporting of incidents?
gender issues • How do women and girls themselves perceive and define gender-based
and gender-based violence in this community (rape, domestic violence, harmful traditional
violence practices, abuse and discrimination, other forms)? How do men perceive and
Sample Situational Analysis Questions
Security measures
Information needed Sample questions
A37
□□ Types and numbers • Are host country police present in the camp? How many? How many women
of police and officers? How often do they patrol? Does their presence enhance the refugees’
security staff/ sense of security or does the population feel threatened by this presence?
volunteers in and Have they been trained in gender-based violence prevention and response?
and coordination?
• Are there consistent and systematic monitoring and evaluation mechanisms for
each service provider? What are these mechanisms?
Health care:
• Are medical protocols in place and in use for different types of gender-based
Sample Situational Analysis Questions
violence? Is the health care facility adequately equipped and staffed with
trained staff to provide help? Which medical staff? How many female medical
staff (specify doctors, nurses, other) are available for examinations and
counseling?
• Do health care staff actively screen for gender-based violence? How?
• How many rape survivors have been counselled and treated for AIDS and other
STDs in the last month? Is pregnancy testing available? What is the legal status
of abortion? Is on-site abortion or referral available? How many tests/referrals in
the last month?
• Do community health workers provide outreach to the refugee community?
Psychosocial:
• Are psychosocial counselling services available? What is ‘counseling’ in this
setting?
• Who are the counsellors? Refugees? National staff? Volunteers? Women?
Men?
• What training have they received? What ongoing supervision, support and
continuing training do they receive?
• What is the role of the counsellor in referral, advocacy, followup, coordination
and information- sharing with other organisations?
• Are there community awareness-raising activities in place to address
community knowledge, attitudes and practices concerning gender and gender-
based violence? What are these activities? How often do they occur? Who is
involved? Refugees? Which refugees? Are the activities effective? How is
effectiveness measured?
• What types of socioeconomic alternatives are offered to survivors? What
programmes in place?
A37
Sample Situational Analysis Questions
Introduction:
We are not asking for your specific stories; please do not use any names. We are asking about
things that you have heard of or know to be happening. The questions we are going to be asking you
today are about the way that you live every day. If you feel uncomfortable at any time you can leave.
Participation in the discussion is completely voluntary and you do not have to answer any questions
A38
We have nothing to offer other than listening; there will be no other direct benefits related to this time
we spend together today.
Focus Group Discussion Guides
We do not want your names and will not be writing your names down. We also will not present any
other potentially identifying information in anything that we produce based on this conversation. We
will treat everything that you say today with respect, and we will only share the answers you give as
general answers combined with those from all the people who speak to us.
We ask that you keep everything confidential, too. Please do not tell others what was said today.
_____________ is taking notes to make sure that we do not miss what you have to say. I hope that
this is OK with you?
We really want to hear what you have to say, and I want you to answer my questions however you
want. There is no wrong answer to any question.
I expect our discussion to last for a maximum time of one hour to one-and-a-half hours.
First I would like to ask you some general questions about life, or the way you live in your
community or in this area.
How do women spend their time in this community? Are they working?
PROBE: What are the known danger zones in this community (or in this area) where women and
girls are at increased risk for violence (water points, taxi terminus, homes, going to the field, going
to and from school, or in schools, etc.)? Are there different danger zones for women than for girls?
If yes, what are they?
How safe are women and young girls when they leave the community? What kinds of things might put
women at risk when they leave the community? What about girls? (PROBE: going to and from school,
crossing borders, going to town, visiting another area)
What about boys, are there specific types of violence that they experience? What examples can you
provide? Where does it happen?
[If the issue of GBV has not come up use the following, if it has come up skip to the next
relevant question]
Without mentioning any names or indicating anyone, can you tell me what kinds of incidents of violence
against women and girls take place in your community? (Ask for specific examples.)
A38
PROBE: When and where does sexual violence occur in this community/area?
PROBE: How is the problem of sexual violence now? How is it different from last year and previous
years?
Without mentioning any names or indicating anyone specific, which groups do you think are most at risk
for sexual violence? And, why do you think these groups are more at risk? (Ask for specific examples.)
Who is considered powerful in this community? What gives people power in this community? (PROBE:
property, spiritual leadership, position of authority, money, having a job…)
Are there ever times when women or girls (or boys or men) have to provide sexual favours to meet their
basic needs (school fees, protection, food, housing, health care, etc.)?
Can you give any examples of young girls engaging in sexual relationships with people who are
influential/powerful in the home or in this community? (If needed, you can probe for other individuals
such as the omalayisha or magumaguma.)
What about boys -- can you describe situations when this might happen to them?
PROBE: When this type of thing happens are girls or boys ever pushed into doing this by anyone (their
family, etc.)?
What other types of violence affect women and girls in this community/area?
PROBE:
• Can you describe any situations when men and boys say things to girls that make them
uncomfortable?
• What kinds of cultural practices exist that you think might be harmful to women and girls in this
community?
• At what age/stage do girls and boys get married in this community? Has this changed this year
as compared to previous years?
• Can you describe times when girls or women are forced or made to leave the community to find
new work or other opportunities?
Now I want to ask you a few questions about what happens after violence takes place.
A38
If a woman or young girl suffers violence (use the different forms/types that were mentioned) is she
likely to tell anyone about it? Who is she likely to talk to (family members, other women, health
Focus Group Discussion Guides
If violence is perpetrated against a boy, would he tell anyone? Why or why not?
How comfortable are women and girls in seeking help from service providers (PROBE: health workers,
police, etc…?
If you were going to seek health services in this area where would you go? (PROBE: health centre,
traditional healer, faith healer) Please describe any barriers that someone might face.
Without mentioning any names, how are girls or women that are affected by violence treated in this
community? Is there ever a situation where girls or women might be blamed for what has happened to
them (through their behaviours, dress, etc.)?
What is done to help survivors of sexual violence in this community? What community structures exist
to do this? What do you think would improve the safety of women and girls in this community?
What groups are there that women, girls, men or boys can go to for support in this community? How
could these services be improved?
What do you think is the most important thing for a person to do after they experience sexual violence
and especially rape (female or male)?
Right now, if a person from your community wanted the perpetrator punished, would they be able to do
this? Please describe any barriers that they might face.
Closing
That is all of my questions for now. Do you have anything you would like to add? Do you have any
questions for us? Do you have any questions that you think should be asked of other groups?
As I told you in the beginning, our discussion today is meant to help us learn about the concerns that
you have for women and children in your community.
Please remember that you agreed to keep this discussion to yourself. If anyone would like to speak to
me or __________ (person taking notes) in private we are happy to talk to you.
A38
Focus Group Discussion Guides
Introduction:
We are not asking for your specific stories; please do not use any names. We are asking about
things that you have heard of or know to be happening. The questions we are going to be asking you
today are about the way that you live every day. If you feel uncomfortable at any time you can leave.
Participation in the discussion is completely voluntary and you do not have to answer any questions
A38
We have nothing to offer other than listening; there will be no other direct benefits related to this time
we spend together today.
Focus Group Discussion Guides
We do not want your names, and we will not be writing your names down. We also will not present
any other potentially identifying information in anything that we produce based on this conversation.
We will treat everything that you say today with respect, and we will only share the answers you give
as general answers combined with those from all the people who speak to us.
We ask that you keep everything confidential, too. Please do not tell others what was said today.
_____________ is taking notes to make sure that we do not miss what you have to say. I hope that
this is OK with you?
We really want to hear what you have to say, and I want you to answer my questions however you
want. There is no wrong answer to any question.
I expect our discussion to last for a maximum time of one hour to one-and-one-half hours.
First I would like to ask you some general questions about life, or the way you live in your
community or in this area.
How are young people spending their time in this community? Are they in school? Are they working?
What problems do young girls face in this community? (Ask for specific examples.)
PROBE: What are the known danger zones in this community (or in this area) where girls are at
increased risk for violence? (water points, taxi terminus, homes, going to the field, going to and
from school, or in schools, etc.)
How safe are young girls when they leave the community? What kinds of things might put girls at risk
when they leave the community? (PROBE: going to and from school, crossing borders, going to town,
visiting another area, taxi terminus)
What about boys -- are there specific types of violence that they experience? What examples can you
provide? Where does it often happen?
[If the issue of GBV has not come up use the following, if it has come up skip to the next
relevant question]
Without mentioning any names or indicating anyone, can you tell me what kinds of incidents of violence
against girls take place in your community? (Ask for specific examples.)
PROBE: When and where does sexual violence occur in this community/area?
PROBE: How is the problem of sexual violence now? How is it different from last year and previous
years?
A38
Without mentioning any names or indicating anyone specific, who are the perpetrators of this kind of
violence? (PROBE: people in authority…?)
Who is considered powerful in this community? What gives people power in this community? (PROBE:
property, spiritual leadership, position of authority, money, having a job…)
Are there ever times when girls (or anyone else) have to provide sexual favours to meet their basic
needs (school fees, protection, food, housing, health care, etc.)?
Can you give any examples of young girls engaging in sexual relationships with people who are
influential/powerful in the home or in this community? (If needed you can probe for other individuals
such as the omalayisha or magumaguma.)
What about boys -- can you describe situations when this might happen to them?
PROBE: When this type of thing happens are girls or boys ever pushed into doing this by anyone (their
family, etc.)?
What other types of violence affect women and girls in this community/area?
PROBE:
• Can you describe any situations when men and boys say things to girls that make them
uncomfortable?
• What kinds of cultural practices exist that you think might be harmful to women and girls in this
community?
• At what age/stage do girls and boys get married in this community? Has the marriage pattern
changed this year as compared to previous years?
• Can you describe times when girls are forced or made to leave the community to find new work
or other opportunities?
A38
Now I want to ask you a few questions about what happens after violence takes place.
If a young girl suffers violence (use the different forms/types that were mentioned) is she likely to tell
Focus Group Discussion Guides
anyone about it? Who is she likely to talk to (family members, other women, health workers, community
leaders, police/security or other authorities or anyone else)?
How comfortable are girls in seeking help from service providers (PROBE: health workers, police,
etc…)?
If you were going to seek health services in this area where would you go? (PROBE: health centre,
traditional healer, faith healer) Please describe any barriers that someone might face.
Without mentioning any names, how are girls or women who are affected by violence treated in this
community? Is there ever a situation where a girl might be blamed for what has happened to her
(through her behaviour, etc.)?
What do you think is the most important thing for a person to do after rape/sodomy?
Right now, if a person from your community wanted the perpetrator punished after rape/sodomy, would
they be able to do this? Please describe any barriers that they might face.
What is done to help survivors of sexual violence in this community? What community structures exist
to do this? What do you think would improve the safety of girls in this community?
What groups are there that women, girls, men or boys can go to for support in this community? How
could these services be improved?
Closing
Thank you. That is all of my questions for now. Do you have anything you would like to add? Do you
have any questions for us? Do you have any questions that you think should be asked of other groups?
As I told you in the beginning, our discussion today is meant to help us learn about the concerns that
you have for women and children in your community.
Please remember that you agreed to keep this discussion to yourself. If anyone would like to speak to
me or __________ (person taking notes) in private we are happy to talk to you.
A38
Focus Group Discussion Guides
Introduction:
We are not asking for your specific stories; please do not use any names. We are asking about
things that you have heard of or know to be happening. The questions we are going to be asking you
today are about the way that you live every day. If you feel uncomfortable at any time you can leave.
Participation in the discussion is completely voluntary and you do not have to answer any questions
that you do not want to answer.
A38
We have nothing to offer other than listening; there will be no other direct benefits related to this time
we spend together today.
Focus Group Discussion Guides
We do not want your names, and we will not be writing your names down. We also will not present
any other potentially identifying information in anything that we produce based on this conversation.
We will treat everything that you say today with respect, and we will only share the answers you give
as general answers combined with those of all the people who speak to us.
We ask that you keep everything confidential, too. Please do not tell others what was said today.
_____________ is taking notes to make sure that we do not miss what you have to say. I hope that
this is OK with you?
We really want to hear what you have to say, and I want you to answer my questions however you
want. There is no wrong answer to any question.
I expect our discussion to last for a maximum time of one hour to one-and-one-half hours.
First I would like to ask you some general questions about life, or the way you live in your
community or in this area.
How are young people spending their time in this community? Are they in school? Are they working?
What are the problems/challenges that young girls and boys face when they move around in this
community?
(Ask for specific examples.)
PROBE: What are the known danger zones in this community (or in this area) where girls are at
increased risk for violence? (water points, taxi terminus, homes, going to the field, going to and
from school, or in schools, etc.)
What about boys, are there specific types of violence that they experience? What examples can you
provide? Where does it often happen?
[If the issue of GBV has not come up use the following, if it has come up skip to the next
relevant question]
Without mentioning any names or indicating anyone, can you tell me what kinds of incidents of violence
against girls take place in your community? (Ask for specific examples.)
PROBE: When and where does sexual violence occur in this community/area?
PROBE: How is the problem of sexual violence now? How is it different from last year and previous
years?
Without mentioning any names or indicating anyone specific, who are the perpetrators of this kind of
violence? (PROBE: people in authority…?)
Without mentioning any names or indicating anyone specific, which groups do you think are most at risk
for sexual violence? And, why do you think these groups are more at risk? (Ask for specific examples.)
Who is considered powerful in this community? What gives people power in this community? (PROBE:
A38
property, spiritual leadership, position of authority, money, having a job…)
Are there ever times when girls (or anyone else) have to provide sexual favours to meet their basic
Can you give any examples of young girls engaging in sexual relationships with people who are
influential/powerful in the home or in this community? (If needed you can probe for other individuals
such as the omalayisha or magumaguma.)
What about boys -- can you describe situations when this might happen to them?
PROBE: When this type of thing happens are girls or boys ever pushed into doing this by anyone (their
family, etc.)?
[If the following issues have not come up use the following questions to explore areas that have
been mentioned]
What other types of violence affect women and girls and boys in this community/area?
PROBES:
• What kinds of cultural practices exist that you think might be harmful to women and girls in this
community?
• At what age/stage do girls and boys get married in this community? Has the marriage pattern
changed this year as compared to previous years?
• Can you describe times when girls are forced or made to leave the community to find new work
or other opportunities?
If a young boy suffers violence (use the different forms/types that were mentioned) is he likely to tell
anyone about it? Who is he likely to talk to (family members, other women, health workers, community
leaders, police/security or other authorities or anyone else)?
How comfortable are boys in seeking help from service providers (PROBE: health workers, police
etc…)?
If you were going to seek health services in this area where would you go? (PROBE: health centre,
traditional healer, faith healer) Please describe any barriers that someone might face.
Without mentioning any names, how are boys who are affected by sexual violence treated in this
community?
What is done to help survivors of sexual violence in this community? What community structures exist
to do this? What do you think would improve the safety of girls in this community?
What groups are there that women, girls, men or boys can go to for support in this community? How
could these services be improved?
A38
What do you think is the most important thing for a person to do after rape/sodomy?
Right now, if a person from your community wanted the perpetrator punished after rape/sodomy, would
Focus Group Discussion Guides
they be able to do this? Please describe any barriers that they might face.
What could be done to prevent violence? What role do you think young people should play in
preventing the violence that we have been talking about?
Closing
Thank you. That is all of my questions for now. Do you have anything you would like to add? Do
you have any questions for us? Do you have any questions that you think should be asked of other
groups?
As I told you in the beginning, our discussion today is meant to help us learn about the concerns that
you have for women and children in your community.
Please remember that you agreed to keep this discussion to yourself. If anyone would like to speak to
me or __________ (person taking notes) in private we are happy to talk to you.
(As the interviewer, introduce yourself, explain the objectives of the interview and request the
respondent’s consent to be interviewed. Note the respondent’s name and job title; describe his
or her duties; and enter the institution’s name and location and the date of the interview.)
Name of person interviewed and contact details if they will provide it: _____________________________
1. What do the words gender-based violence mean to you? (If the respondent does not seem
to know what GBV is, ask What about sexual violence or domestic violence? to see if they
encounter these things.)
2. What types of cases of gender-based violence do you handle? (If the respondent lists
something other than sexual violence, ask him/her what is the most frequent type of violence
against women and girls that he/she handles?)
A39
3. How often do you handle sexual violence cases? How many per week or month?
5. From what individuals or organizations do you typically receive reports of sexual violence?
(PROBE: victims/survivors, family members, health professionals, etc.)
Who are the main victims/survivors of sexual violence? (PROBE: who are the main perpetrators,
survivors, what are their ages, sex…?)
6. What legal facilities or personnel exist for victims/survivors of sexual violence or other forms of
gender-based violence and punish perpetrators? (e.g., court, local/traditional, or civil authorities)
7. Has anyone in your institution received training on sexual violence or other forms of gender-
based violence? If so, what was the training about, who received it, who provided it, and how
many days did it last? Are the individuals who were trained still in their post?
8. What services do you provide to victims/survivors of sexual violence or other forms of gender-
based violence? (Try to get the respondent to be as specific as possible, e.g., provision of
information on court process, roles and responsibilities of different actors, time frames, etc.)
10. Does anyone from this institution accompany, advocate for and support the victim/survivor
during any meetings with the police or court officials? (If yes, ask the respondent to describe
how this process works and who is responsible for doing this.)
11. Who is responsible for providing support to the victim/survivor during the legal proceedings?
(PROBE: Liaison with the police? Legal or trial proceedings? Psychosocial support? Logistical
support/accommodation and food?)
12. Which laws are used in addressing gender-based violence and how are they enforced, and by
whom?
13. How do you ensure the survivor’s confidentiality and protection (during pre-trial, trial and post-
trial)?
A39
14. Do you ever refer survivors to other services such as counselling or healthcare? If yes, where
are these services located? How do they provide the referral? How do you ensure that the
service is provided?
Key Informant Interview Guides: GBV
15. How do you work with other service providers (NGOs, government departments, health facilities,
legal, law enforcement, psychosocial (social welfare)) on the issue of gender-based violence?
16. What other structures, activities and forums (or other coordination system) is your institution
involved in to address the needs of victims/survivors of sexual violence or other types of gender-
based violence?
17. What are some of the challenges that you face in responding to sexual violence or other form of
gender-based violence?
(As the interviewer, introduce yourself, explain the objectives of the interview and request the
respondent’s consent to be interviewed. Note the respondent’s name, position and job title;
describe his or her duties; and enter the institution’s name and location and the date of the
interview.)
Name of person interviewed and contact details if they will provide it: _____________________________
2. What types of GBV do you think are most prevalent in this community?
A39
What types of cases of gender-based violence are you involved in as a DA? (If they list
something other than sexual violence, ask them what is the most frequent type of violence
against women and girls that they handle.)
How often (if ever) do you see domestic violence cases? How many per week or month?
3. What are the commonly used channels for reporting gender-based violence? From what
individuals or organizations do you typically receive reports of sexual violence? (PROBE:
victims/survivors, family members, health professionals, etc.)
4. Have you been trained on sexual violence or other forms of gender-based violence? How long
did the training last and who provided it?
5. How do you respond to cases of sexual violence or other forms of sexual violence? For what
services do you refer (psychosocial, medical, legal)?
6. Are there places for victims/survivors of gender-based violence (or specifically sexual or
domestic violence) to go to when their life is in danger? Where can you refer such clients
(shelters, etc.)?
7. Does your police station have the ability to transport or accompany victims/survivors for further
services? If no, how do victims/survivors access the services? (PROBE: sexual violence
survivors)
9. How would you describe the relationship between this police station and NGOs over rape cases?
10. What policies or laws (national, county-level) are in place for cases of sexual violence or other
forms of gender-based violence? How do you use these policies?
Are cases of sexual violence ever handled by village heads/leaders? How do they intervene in
these cases?
11. What other structures, activities and forums (or other coordination system) is your institution
involved in to address the needs of victims/survivors of sexual violence or other types of gender-
based violence?
12. What other challenges are there related to ensuring that survivors of gender-based violence
A39
have access to services and in preventing gender-based violence? How do you think some of
these challenges could be addressed?
Key Informant Interview Guides: GBV
(As the interviewer, introduce yourself, explain the objectives of the interview and request the
respondent’s consent to be interviewed. Note the respondent’s name, position and job title; describe his
or her duties; and enter the institution’s name and location and the date of the interview.)
Name of the health care facility: _____________________ Level of the health care facility:
Rural Health Facility (level 1)
City Council Clinics (level 1)
District (level 2)
Provincial (level 3)
Other ______________
Name of person interviewed and contact details if they will provide it: _____________________________
Service provision
1. What are the most frequent reasons given by women and girls for coming to this health facility?
3. Does your facility treat survivors of gender-based violence (e.g., survivors of sexual violence)?
Probe: What are the most common types of violence that women and girls receive services for?
5. Does the survivor have to consent to getting an HIV test in order to receive PEP?
Do you obtain consent from survivors/victims or parent/guardians of child survivors prior to starting the
examination or collecting evidence?
A39
If yes, ask how do you obtain consent? Ask them to describe the process and make sure to determine if
it is written or verbal. Request a copy of the forms.
Do you refer to other service providers, police and courts? Where are the people referred to (NGOs,
support groups)? (Try to get the names of the institutions.)
How do you follow-up on survivors once they have left the health facility?
9. Do you collect physical evidence from survivors/victims (e.g., clothing, footwear, hair, fibers, or debris,
etc.)? If so, where do you store it?
Where do the kits come from? Do you get them from the police?
11. Do you keep records of patients who have been examined after rape?
If yes, ask: Where do you keep the files related to cases of sexual violence?
Are there specific forms that you use? (Request a copy of all of the forms that they use, including referral
forms.)
12. Does this facility have protocols/guidelines for the management of rape survivors?
A39
If yes, ask: Where do you keep them? And ask to see them.
Key Informant Interview Guides: GBV
13. Who makes the decision when reporting a case of sexual violence to the police (health care providers,
the survivors/victims of the violence, parent/guardian)?
14. What do you do if you have a suspicion that a parent or guardian is involved in the sexual abuse of a
child? How do you proceed with managing the safety needs of that child?
15. How many adult survivors/victims (18 years and older) were examined/treated after sexual violence
during the last five months?
Or, on average, how many adult survivors/victims do you see each month?
If they have records, ask them about the periods of 2007 and 2008.
16. How many child survivors/victims (17 years and younger) were examined/treated after child sexual
abuse in the last five months?
Or, on average, how many child survivors/victims do you see each month?
If they have records, ask them about the periods of 2007 and 2008.
If yes, ask: how many different trainings have you attended, and who provided the trainings? How many
days did the training last?
18. What kinds of things were covered in the trainings that you attended? Check anything that applies and/
or use list to help you probe.
Medical treatment
PEP
Using an evidence collection kit
Completing the medico-legal form
Laws (covering rape and sexual offences)
Referrals to other services
Giving evidence in court
Counselling
Did your training include meeting the needs of male survivors/victims?
Did the training include meeting the needs of child survivors/victims?
Attitudes
A39
19. How does the staff know if a woman has been raped?
22. Do you think a woman’s prior sexual relationships have anything to do with rape? Does rape hurt
women who are sexually experienced?
Multi-sectoral services
23. How would you describe the relationship between this health facility and the closest police station over
rape cases?
24. How would you describe the relationship between this health care facility and NGOs over rape cases?
25. What other structures, activities and forums (or other coordination system) is your institution
involved in to address the needs of victims/survivors of sexual violence or other types of
gender-based violence?
(As the interviewer, introduce yourself, explain the objectives of the interview and request the
respondent’s consent to be interviewed. Note the respondent’s name, position and job title;
describe his or her duties; and enter the institution’s name and location and the date of the
interview.)
Name of person interviewed and contact details if they will provide it: _____________________________
2. What types of GBV do you think are most prevalent in this community?
What types of cases of gender-based violence do you handle? (If they list something other than
sexual violence, ask them what is the most frequent type of violence against women and girls that
they handle.)
3. How often (if ever) do you handle sexual violence cases or other forms of gender-based
violence? How many per week or month?
4. What are the commonly used channels for reporting gender-based violence? From what
individuals or organizations do you typically receive reports of sexual violence? (PROBE:
victims/survivors, family members, health professionals, etc.)
5. Is there someone at the police station specifically trained to provide victim -friendly services?
Have they been trained to handle sexual violence or other forms of gender-based violence?
How long did the training last and who provided it?
8. Are you able to help victims/survivors of gender-based violence (or specifically sexual or
domestic violence) relocate when their life is in danger? Where can you refer such clients
(shelters, etc.)?
9. Does your police station have the ability to transport or accompany victims/survivors for further
services? If no, how do victims/survivors access the services? (PROBE: sexual violence
survivors)
10. How do you document the victim’s statement? Are there specific forms that you use? (Request
a copy of all of the forms that they use, including referral forms). How much do the forms cost?
11. What kind of documentation is required to initiate legal proceedings and investigations (rape kit,
medical affidavit)?
A39
12. Do you or others in your station ever testify in court about investigation findings, if the victim/
survivor chooses legal action?
How would you describe the relationship between this police station and the closest health
facility over sexual violence as well as gender-based violence? How do you work
together?
14. How would you describe the relationship between this police station and NGOs over rape
cases?
15. What policies or laws (national, county-level or traditional) are in place for cases of sexual
violence or other forms of gender-based violence?
16. What other structures, activities and forums (or other coordination system) is your institution
involved in to address the needs of victims/survivors of sexual violence or other types of
gender-based violence?
17. How do you think some of these challenges you face could be addressed?
(As the interviewer, introduce yourself, explain the objectives of the interview and request the
respondent’s consent to be interviewed. Note the respondent’s name, position and job title;
describe his or her duties; and enter the institution’s name and location and the date of the
interview.)
Name of person interviewed and contact details if they will provide it: _____________________________
1. What do the words gender-based violence mean to you? (If the respondent does not seem
to know what GBV is, ask What about sexual violence or domestic violence? to see if they
encounter these things.)
2. What types of cases of gender-based violence do you handle? (If they list something other
than sexual violence, ask what is the most frequent type of violence against women and girls
A39
3. How often (if ever) do you handle sexual violence cases? How many per week or month?
Key Informant Interview Guides: GBV
4. From what individuals or organizations do you typically receive reports of sexual violence?
(PROBE: victims/survivors, family members, health professionals, etc.)
5. Is there someone in this organization who is specifically trained to work with sexual violence or
other forms of gender-based violence?
What kind of training did they receive, who provided it, and what did it focus on? How many
days did it last?
7. Can you tell me how you document the survivor’s statement? Are there specific forms that you
use? (Request a copy of all of the forms that they use, including referral forms.)
8. Where do you keep the case files for incidents of gender-based violence?
9. What if any, follow-up and/or referral do you provide? Where do you make referrals?
10. What policies or laws (national, provincial, district or traditional) are in place for cases of sexual
violence or other forms of gender-based violence?
12. How would you describe the relationship between this organization and other service providers
(police, courts, health facilities)? What about the relationship between the police and the health
care facility?
13. How would you describe the relationship between the closest police station and NGOs over
rape cases?
14. What other structures, activities and forums (or other coordination system) is your institution
involved in to address the needs of victims/survivors of sexual violence or other types of
gender-based violence?
15. What are some of the challenges you face in responding to sexual violence or other forms of
gender-based violence?
(As the interviewer, introduce yourself, explain the objectives of the interview and request the
respondent’s consent to be interviewed. Note the respondent’s name, position and job title;
describe his or her duties; and enter the institution’s name and location and the date of the
A39
interview.)
Name of person interviewed and contact details if they will provide it: _____________________________
1. What kinds programmes is your agency implementing? Where are you implementing your
programmes? (Try to get specific information on province, districts, wards, etc.)
If they are engaged in food distribution, water and sanitation, etc., try to identify if they do
anything to address gender concerns.
2. What types of GBV do you think are most prevalent in this community?
3. What do you think are the major gaps in terms of preventing and responding to gender-based
violence?
4. If your staff came across a case of gender-based violence during their work what would they
do? (PROBE: victims/survivors, family members, health professionals etc.)
5. What kind of mechanisms does your agency have in place to prevent sexual exploitation and
abuse?
6. Do you know of any structures, activities and forums (or other coordination system) that exist
to address the needs of victims/survivors of sexual violence or other types of gender-based
violence?
7. How do you think some of these challenges you face could be addressed?
2. If there is a process set up, ask: Can you take me through the steps of the registration
process? [Try to see if issues of privacy and confidentiality are being considered.]
3. How will/are family entitlement cards/ration cards issued? Will/are women registered
separately from their husbands?
4. What systems are in place to make sure that the various groups have equal access to
housing and materials?
5. What do you think should be done in the long-term to ensure that everyone (women,
men, boys and girls) will enjoy continued access to the registration process and NFI
distribution?
6. What kinds of teams will be created for registration? Who will conduct interviews?
7. Where will your organization store registration data? Who will have access to the data?
8. What concerns have been raised by different groups? What concerns do you have for
different groups (single-headed households, young group, unaccompanied minors,
elderly) in relationship to:
• Shelter
• Site planning
• Registration
• NFI distribution?
Participation
1. How are women being consulted specifically in planning NFI selection and distribution,
information-sharing about entitlements?
2. How will women be involved in camp governance structures? Will there be a target
percentage for the participation of women?
3. What kinds of specialized support will be needed to ensure that women and adolescents
can participate in decision-making?
A40
2. What other organizations/civil society groups is your organization working with in this
area?
Training/capacity-building
1. What kinds of training have you received from your organization on gender issues? Or
what kinds of training do you anticipate receiving?
2. What field tools does your organization commonly use in its work?
3. Who from the beneficiary community will be trained and employed in food distribution
programmes?
Actions to address GBV/targeted actions
1. What should be done to reduce women’s and children’s vulnerability to violence as they
try to access food distribution?
2. What kinds of actions are already being taken to ensure that food distributions are safe
and accessible?
3. Which groups will need special assistance with collecting their food? What special
mechanisms might be considered to address this?
4. What kind of system is in place or will be established to monitor security or instances of
abuse or violence?
5. What kinds of training and skills programmes are being considered for women and girls to
keep them from having to trade sex for money, food or education?
6. What kinds of plans are there for community awareness on violence against women and
girls, child rights, property rights, etc.?
Monitoring and evaluation
1. Who will be consulted in the process of creating the monitoring and evaluation tools/
mechanisms around food distribution? How will gaps and areas for improvements be
identified? Who will be consulted?
2. What kind of sex and age-related data will be collected?
Coordination
1. What kinds of coordination activities is your organization engaged in?
2. What other organizations/civil society groups is your organization working with in this
area?
284 Section Six: Annexes
Key Informant Interview Guide for Individuals working in Water, Sanitation and Hygiene
A40
latrines and bathhouses located? Are the facilities centrally located? Do doors have locks
on the inside? Is there an adequate lighting system?
Training/capacity-building
1. What kinds of training have you received from your organization on gender issues? Or
Coordination
1. What kinds of coordination activities is your organization engaged in?
2. What other organizations/civil society groups is your organization working with in this
area?
Introduction:
The Gender-Based Violence Information Management System (GBVIMS) is a multi-faceted initiative that enables
humanitarian actors who are responding to GBV to safely collect, store and analyze reported GBV incident data.
The GBVIMS includes: a practical, inter-active workbook that outlines the critical steps agencies and inter-
agency GBV coordination bodies must take in order to implement the System; an Excel database (the “Incident
Recorder”) for data compilation and trends analysis; and a global team of GBV and database experts from UNFPA,
UNHCR and the IRC for ongoing on-site and remote technical support.
Background:
As of today, the humanitarian community does not have an endorsed system that allows for the effective and safe
storage, analysis and sharing of GBV-related data. This affects humanitarian actors’ ability to obtain a reliable
picture of the GBV being reported. It also minimizes the utility of collected data to inform program decisions for
effective GBV prevention and care for survivors. Due to the sensitive nature of GBV data and concerns by many
A41
frontline GBV actors in how GBV data is used, there is also very limited information-sharing between key
stakeholders. This hampers GBV coordination and limits a multi-sectoral response.
Purpose:
GBVIMS Project Overview
The GBVIMS was created to harmonize data collection on GBV in humanitarian settings, to provide a simple system
for GBV project managers to collect and analyze their data, and to enable the confidential, safe and ethical sharing
of aggregate and anonymous incident data on reported cases of GBV. The intention of the System is both to assist
service providers to better understand the GBV cases being reported and to enable actors to share data internally
across project sites and externally with agencies for broader trends analysis and to improve GBV coordination.
2. Data Sharing
Providing a safe and ethical mechanism for primary service providers to share and access compiled GBV
data is one cornerstone of good GBV coordination. At a minimum, actors should be clear on what data will
be shared, for what purpose, who will compile the data, and how and when actors will be able to access the
compiled statistics. The GBVIMS Incident Recorder anonymizes and standardizes reported GBV data
in order to facilitate sharing of sensitive information between humanitarian actors in a safe manner1.
Comprehensive guidelines for developing data-sharing protocols, as well as information on all of the
ethical and safety issues that must be considered before sharing data are an integral part of the GBVIMS
project.
GBVIMS OVERVIEW
GBVIMS Global Team 7/6/2009 Page 1 OF 1
Monitoring
Limitations:
In its current format, the Incident Recorder is a trends-analysis tool that will let the user store and
analyze good-quality statistical data on reported GBV incidents. The Incident Recorder cannot
replace the existing case management systems used by service providers. The Incident Recorder
is not an appropriate tool for Human Rights monitoring, nor is it appropriate for monitoring the
quality of program interventions because it cannot capture this level of information. Furthermore,
the data pertains only to reported incidents; thus it may not be a reflection of the actual prevalence
of GBV in a given community. It is only one method of data collection in a situation that requires
mixed-method analysis.
Expected results:
A41
The expected outcomes of the GBVIMS project are:
• A standard tool and methodology for data collection and analysis
• Instructions for classifying GBV incidents
The GBVIMS is expected to have the following impact on GBV prevention and response:
• More informed programmatic decision-making for individual service providers (organizations) and inter-
agency working groups
• Improved data-sharing and collaboration between humanitarian actors
• Improved donor reporting
• Bolstered advocacy efforts (i.e. policy development and fundraising)
1
Please note that not all of the data gathered and entered into the Incident Recorder database will be shared. The information
sharing protocol development includes agreement by all participating agencies on which data will be shared amongst all
participating parties.
GBVIMS OVERVIEW
GBVIMS Global Team 7/6/2009 Page 2 OF 2
Each of the definitions below refers to the concept of consent.2 Consent is when a person makes an informed choice to agree freely
and voluntarily to do something. There is no consent when agreement is obtained through:
• the use of threats, force or other forms of coercion, abduction, fraud, manipulation, deception, or misrepresentation
• the use of a threat to withhold a benefit to which the person is already entitled, or
• a promise is made to the person to provide a benefit.
Eight core incident types.3 The eight core incident types were created for data collection and statistical analysis of gender-
based violence (GBV).4 Even though some may be applicable to other forms of violence that are not gender- based they should be
used only in reference to GBV.
1. Rape: non-consensual penetration (however slight) of the vagina, anus or mouth with a penis or other body
part. Also includes penetration of the vagina or anus with an object.
2. Sexual assault: any form of non-consensual sexual contact that does not result in or include penetration.
A42
Examples include: attempted rape, as well as unwanted kissing, fondling, or touching of genitalia and buttocks.
This incident type does not include rape, i.e., where penetration has occurred.
3. Physical assault: physical violence that is not sexual in nature. Examples include: hitting, slapping, choking,
cutting, shoving, burning, shooting or use of any weapons, acid attacks or any other act that results in pain,
GBVIMS Incident Classification System
discomfort or injury.
4. Forced marriage: the marriage of an individual against her or his will.
5. Denial of resources, opportunities & services: denial of rightful access to economic resources/assets or
livelihood opportunities, education, health or other social services. Examples include a widow prevented from
receiving an inheritance, earnings forcibly taken by an intimate partner or family member, a woman
prevented from using contraceptives, a girl prevented from attending school, etc. Reports of general poverty
should not be recorded.
6. Psychological / emotional abuse: infliction of mental or emotional pain or injury. Examples include: threats
of physical or sexual violence, intimidation, humiliation, forced isolation, stalking, harassment, unwanted
attention, remarks, gestures or written words of a sexual and/or menacing nature, destruction of cherished
things, etc.
7. Female genital cutting/mutilation: all procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia
or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons.
8. Other GBV: This category should be used only if any of the above types do not apply and should be avoided
as much as possible. Please note: This category does NOT include intimate partner violence and child sexual
abuse, which is tracked using the perpetrator-survivor relationship data. For sex trafficking, sexual
slavery, sexual exploitation and forced prostitution please see the explanation on page 3 of this document.
1
The Incident Classification System is part of the process of developing a GBVIMS initiated in 2006 by OCHA, UNHCR, and
the IRC. The GBVIMS global team has counted on technical guidance from the Inter-Agency Standing Committee’s (IASC)
Sub-Working Group on Gender and Humanitarian Action, throughout the project.
2
Many laws set an age of consent. These legal parameters do not apply to the incident types proposed for this system.
3
Case definitions used in the context of GBV programming are not necessarily the legal definitions used in national laws and
policies. Many forms of GBV may not be considered crimes, and legal definitions and terms vary greatly across countries and
regions.
4
Several resources were considered when preparing this document. Most importantly, the IASC Guidelines for
Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Setting, and Sexual and Gender-Based Violence against Refugees,
Returnees, and Internally Displaced Persons, Guidelines for Prevention and Response (UNHCR)
Before you start answering the questions below to determine the incident type, remember: only incidents reported directly by the
survivor (or by the survivor’s guardian if the survivor is a child or is unable to report due to a disability) in the context of receiving a
service can be recorded, which automatically excludes recording an incident in which the victim has already died at the time the incident
is being recorded.7
a. Was the reported incident a case of FGM/C? e. Was the incident an act of forced marriage?
If yes classify the incident as “FGM/C”. If yes classify the incident as “forced marriage”.
If no proceed to the next incident type on the list. If no proceed to the next incident type on the list.
b. Did the reported incident involve penetration? f. Did the reported incident involve the denial of
If yes classify the incident as “rape”. resources, opportunities or services?
If no proceed to the next incident type on the list. If yes classify the incident as “denial of
c. Did the reported incident involve unwanted sexual resources, opportunities or services”.
A42
contact? If no proceed to the next incident type on the list.
If yes classify the incident as “sexual assault”. g. Did the reported incident involve
If no proceed to the next incident type on the list. psychological/emotional abuse?
d. Did the reported incident involve physical assault? If yes classify the incident as “psychological
Service providers are encouraged to continue to capture all the information of reported incidents needed for service provision as
described by their clients in their case notes. The type of information appropriate to collect and record may differ between services.
5
The order is NOT intended to express an implied ‘value’ of the incident (i.e. rape is worse than forced marriage).
6
For example, within this system, an incident where a woman reports having been beaten by her husband and also forced
to have sex with him the incident would be classified as “rape”.
7
This rule was established to avoid 3rd party reports outside of the context of service delivery.
Explanation:
• Intimate Partner Violence is defined by the relationship between perpetrator and survivor and may include multiple forms
of violence (rape, sexual assault, physical assault, and psychological / emotional abuse), which can lead to inconsistencies in the
recording of incidents. By analysis of the type of incident together with the survivor’s relationship to the perpetrator, one is
able to identify which incidents took place within the context of an intimate partner relationship and they can be easily analyzed as
“intimate partner violence” cases.
• Child Sexual Abuse is defined by the age of the survivor and may include multiple forms of sexual violence (sexual assault and
rape), which can lead to inconsistencies in the recording of incidents. By analysis of the two possible incident types (sexual assault
and rape) together with the age of the survivor, one is able to easily analyze which reported incidents were “child sexual abuse” cases.
A42
• Early marriage is defined by the age of the survivor at the time of the incident of forced marriage. By analysis of the incident
(forced marriage) and the age of the survivor, one is able easily to analyze which reported incidents were “early marriages”.
Incident Type Accused Perpetrator Adult/Child Analysis
Forced Marriage + Any + Child = Early Marriage
• Sexual Exploitation and Transactional Sex are defined by the power relationship between survivor and
perpetrator, as well as the circumstances surrounding the incident - not the actual act of violence (i.e. rape or sexual assault),
which can lead to inconsistencies in the recording of incidents. To track these power relationships and circumstances it is useful
to assign a question in the Intake/Initial Assessment form in which ‘yes / no’ can be indicated in response to “were money, goods,
benefits and/or services exchanged in the context of the reported incident?” The analysis of this question in relation to the incident
type can give a sense of whether the sexual violence being reported is exploitative in nature.
8
Intimate Partner Violence refers to violence perpetrated against an individual by her or his partner (whether legally married or
cohabiting), boyfriend or girlfriend, or other sexual partner.
9
For the purposes of this system, all persons under 18 years of age are considered to be children
• Harmful Traditional Practices are acts derived from social, cultural and religious values, that relate to age, gender and social
class, which are harmful to the health, well-being and development of the person it is committed against. Most often they are practices
affecting women and girls, such as female genital cutting/mutilation, early and forced marriage, son preference, and dowry demands.
Many harmful traditional practices can be defined and tracked using the seven core incident types listed above (excluding “other
GBV”). To distinguish those actions that are culture or religion-specific, you may wish to include a “yes/no” tick box to enable data
recorders to mark the incident as a harmful traditional practice and to analyze the data accordingly. During your analysis you can
then quantify how many instances were marked “yes” for Harmful Traditional Practice and adjust your programming accordingly if
needed.
A42
FGC/M + ANY + Yes = Harmful Traditional Practice
10
The survivor code should be stored in a separate locked location which only limited staff have access to.
Case Number / Incident ID*: Date of interview (day/month/year)*: Date of incident (day/month/ Name of interviewer / interviewer code:
year)*:
Reported by the survivor*
Reported by someone other than the survivor*
1-Referral Type
Was this client referred to you from somewhere or by someone else?* No Yes
If ‘Yes’ to the above question, from which of the following was the client referred?* (select one)
Time of incident*: (Select ONE) Location of incident*: (Customize and add new tick boxes according to your location, but please
Morning (sunrise to noon) only select ONE option.)
Afternoon (noon to sunset) Bush / Forest
Evening/night (sunset to sunrise) Garden / Cultivated Field
Unknown/not applicable School
Road
A43
Perpetrator’s Home
Other (give details) ________________________
5-Planned Action / Action Taken: Any action / activity regarding this report.
A43
Client referred to a safe house/safe shelter?* Date Reported or Future Appointment Date (day/
month/year)/ Time:
Yes No
GBVIMS Standard Initial Intake/Initial Assessment Form
Client referred to health services?* Date Reported or Future Appointment Date (day/
month/year)/ Time:
Yes No
Client referred to legal services?* Date Reported or Future Appointment Date (day/
month/year) / Time:
Yes No
A43
does not want legal services.
Client referred to the police?* Date Reported or Future Appointment Date (day/
month/year)/ Time:
Yes No
Client referred to a livelihood programme?* Date Reported or Future Appointment Date (day/
month/year)/ Time:
Yes No
Will the client be safe when she or he leaves? Yes If raped, have you Have you explained the
No explained the effects of effects of rape to the
If no give reason: rape to the client (if over client’s caregiver (if the
14 years of age)? client is under the age of
14)?
Yes No
Yes No
The statement below should be read to the client and/or guardian in her/his native language. It should be clearly explained to the
client that she/he can choose to not allow information sharing. Have the clients tick “Yes” or “No”
(Client’s name) gives permission for (the name of your organization) staff to share general information about the incident
reported to them. The information shared will not be specific in any way. Your name or any specific details of the incident will not
be shared. There will be no way for someone to identify you based on the information that is shared.
You understand that the purpose of sharing this information is so you can receive the best possible protection and care. You
understand that this shared information will be treated with confidentiality and respect, and shared only as needed for the
purposes of preventing this from happening to others and in order to provide the best care possible to all our clients.
Before beginning the interview, please be sure to remind your client that all information given will be
kept confidential, and that they may choose to decline to answer to any of the following questions.
The purpose of this information-sharing protocol is to set out the guiding principles and describe procedures
for sharing anonymous consolidated data on reported cases of GBV. [INSERT NAME OF SELECTED
NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AGENCY] in its capacity as [INSERT coordinating organization name: can
be the sub-cluster lead, GBV Working Group lead, lead NGO, etc.] lead for GBV prevention and response
work in [INSERT THE NAME OF THE COUNTRY].
The data-gathering organizations recognize that sharing and receiving consolidated GBV data will
contribute towards improved inter-agency coordination, identifying and targeting gaps, prioritization of
A44
actions and improved programming of prevention and response efforts. It may also result in improved
advocacy efforts, increased leverage for fund raising and resource mobilization and improved monitoring.
GROUND RULES
All survivor-specific information that can lead to identification of the survivor will not be shared, e.g., name,
initials, sub-county, date of birth, etc.
When approval of data-sharing is attained, [NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AGENCY] must share the data
along with the following relevant caveats:
The data is only from reported cases, in limited areas of coverage, by limited data-gathering
organizations. The consolidated data is in no way representative of the total incidence or
prevalence of GBV in any one location or group of locations.
The aggregate data is based solely on monthly consolidated reports submitted from GBVIMS
partners for the purposes of:
• GBV prevention and response programme planning, monitoring and evaluation
• Identification of programming and service delivery gaps
• Prioritization of actions and next steps
• Improved service delivery
• Policy and advocacy1
• Resource mobilization
1
[NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AGENCY] should inform partners how they will use the data for advocacy, e.g., what
policies they are seeking to reform, what activities they are seeking to fund.
Section Six: Annexes 297
MONTHLY REPORTS2 and INFORMATION-SHARING PROCEDURE
DATA SECURITY
[NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AGENCY] and the data-gathering organizations will ensure that all data
is safe and secure and will implement appropriate procedures to maintain confidentiality of the data.
Organizations will submit a Word document in ‘read only’ form and will employ password protection. The
password for these submitted files has been agreed among all agencies.
[NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AGENCY] has outlined during the creation of this protocol how the data
will be:
• Received
A44
• Stored/deleted
• Protected in the computer
• Used by whom (who has access to the data and the computer)
GBVIMS Sample Information Sharing Protocol
The monthly reports are shared with [NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AGENCY] in its capacity as lead GBV
organization. In the event that the leadership changes hands, the information-sharing protocol will be
reviewed by each of the data-gathering organizations. Submission of monthly reports to the new lead will
not be automatic.
[NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AGENCY] will issue a written request to each of the data- gathering
organizations every time there is a request to receive the consolidated data, specifying the reason/purpose
for the request for information, what the information will be used for, how the information will be used
and how the information produced with the consolidated data and analysis will be fed back to the data-
gathering organizations.
The consolidated data will be shared only after receiving written consent from the data- gathering
organizations. In turn [NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AGENCY] must create a written agreement with the
data requesting party about the use, protection and caveats outlined above regarding the consolidated
data and specifying that the data requesting party will not share the consolidated data any further.
A party that has had access to the consolidated data must direct any request for the shared data to
[NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AGENCY]. For example, if the Ministry of Gender receives the consolidated
data from the consolidation agency and then the Ministry of Justice requests to receive that same
information from the Ministry of Gender, then the Ministry of Gender needs to refer the Ministry of Justice
back to [NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AGENCY], who will be responsible for getting in touch with the
data- gathering organizations before sending out the consolidated data to the Ministry of Justice.
When a request for data-sharing is submitted by the [NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AGENCY], the data-
2
See Annex for list and samples of reporting tables.
298 Section Six: Annexes
gathering organizations will respond the request within five (5) working days.
[NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AGENCY] can only share consolidated data and no individual organization
information.
By this information-sharing protocol, the data-gathering organizations understand that they can refer any
request for information to [NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AGENCY] who can then share the consolidated
data after receiving a written request.
TIME LIMIT
Once agreed, this information-sharing protocol will take effect on [DATE], and will be on trial basis until
[DATE], upon which the data-gathering organizations will review the effectiveness of, use of and adherence
to the protocol.
Data-gathering organizations reserve the right to stop sharing data for any reason at any time and will
inform [NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION AGENCY] in writing if/when they do so.
BREACHES
A44
will be reviewed.
The data-gathering organizations reserve the right to refuse to share information about reported GBV
cases to any external actor.
Following are the reporting formats the data-gathering organizations agree to submit. These are automatically
generated from the GBVIMS. The reports generated from the IMS Excel program will be transferred into a Word
document.
Monthly Reports
1. Incident Type by Survivor Age Group
A44
Count of Incident ID Sex of Survivor
Grand
Adult/Child When Incident Took Place F Total
Count of Incident ID
A44
Count of Incident ID
Livelihood Programme Total
Referred 6
Service already received 2
Service not applicable 2
Service provided by reporting
agency 5
Referral declined by survivor 3
Service unavailable 1
A44
Grand Total 19
Incident Report Date (Month/Year) Mar-2009
Incident Report Date (Year) (All)
Count of Incident ID
Alleged Perpetrator Relationship Incident Type Total
Intimate Partner / Former Partner Physical Assault 1
Sexual Assault 1
Denial of Resources, Opportunities &
Services 1
Psychological/Emotional Abuse 1
Female Genital Cutting/Mutilation 1
Intimate Partner / Former Partner Total 5
Supervisor / Employer Forced Marriage 1
Other GBV 1
Rape 1
Sexual Assault 1
Denial of Resources, Opportunities &
Services 1
Supervisor / Employer Total 5
Family Other Than Spouse Forced Marriage 1
A44
Other GBV 1
Physical Assault 1
Rape 1
Psychological/Emotional Abuse 1
Family Other Than Spouse Total 5
GBVIMS Sample Information Sharing Protocol
2. Number of Days Lapsed Between Incident Date and Incident Report Date in Incidents of Physical
Assault, Rape and Sexual Assault
Count of Incident ID
Incident Type Range of Days Between Incident & Report Total
Physical Assault 0 - 3 Days 1
More than 2 weeks/under a month 2
More than a month 3
A44
Rape 0 - 3 Days 1
6 - 14 Days 1
More than a month 5
Sexual Assault 0 - 3 Days 2
3. Incident Time of Day (excluding Psychological Abuse, Economic Abuse and Forced Marriage)
1.5
Afternoon
Evening/Night
Morning
0.5
0
Other GBV Physical Assault Rape Sexual Assault Female Genital
Cutting/Mutilation
The Afghanistan Gender-Based Violence Working Group (AGBV WG) was established as a national coordinating
body to strengthen and enhance the efforts and activities of stakeholders in the country, in the prevention of and
response to gender-based violence. Its Terms of Reference (TOR) are established within the framework of the TOR
for the Afghanistan Protection Cluster (APC), version of 24 April 2008.1
I Definition of gender-based violence within the context of the AGBV Working Group
In order to ensure a uniform understanding among the members of this working group, gender-based violence
will be defined as any form of violence directed against women, girls, boys and men on the basis of socially
attributed differences between males and females. It includes acts that inflict physical, mental, sexual harm or
suffering, as well as threats of such acts, coercion and other deprivations of liberty.
1. Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring in the family, including battering, sexual exploitation,
sexual abuse of children in the household, dowry-related violence, marital rape, traditional practices harmful
to women, non-spousal violence and violence related to exploitation.
A45
2. Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring within the general community, including rape,
sexual abuse, sexual harassment and intimidation at work, in educational institutions and elsewhere, as well
as trafficking in women, girls, boys and men, and forced prostitution.
Sample TOR-Afghanistan
3. Physical, sexual and psychological violence perpetrated or condoned by the State and institutions,
wherever it occurs.
1. To consolidate, coordinate, improve and support the activities of all relevant stakeholders in the prevention
of and response to GBV within the context of humanitarian action in Afghanistan.
2. Within the humanitarian setting, the AGBV working group shall target and prioritize GBV issues relating
to most vulnerable or affected groups. The AGBV working group recognizes that there will be different
priorities in the different regions of Afghanistan and that these should be determined at field level with the
active guidance of the Working Group.
1. Leadership
The AGBV Working Group will be chaired by UNDP, with a national NGO as Deputy Chair.
2. Membership
a. In order to ensure a holistic and multi-sectoral approach in the prevention of and response to GBV,
membership of the AGBV Working Group will be extended to international and national NGOs,
international organizations, government representatives and other entities providing services in the
health, psychosocial, legal and security sectors.
b. Appointed cluster gender focal points will be members of the AGBV Working Group, in order to ensure
the participation of each cluster.
c. Membership of national NGOs and entities shall be encouraged, in order to ensure ownership and
sustainability of the Working Group. Membership of national NGOs providing services in provinces,
1
APC TOR, point IV, paragraph 10.
1. Provincial working groups established after the approval of these TOR will adopt the TOR but amend it as
necessary to suit provincial circumstances. The working groups will define their own membership criteria,
meeting timetables and elect their Chair.
2. Meetings
a. The Working Group will meet on the last Tuesday of every month.
b. Extraordinary meetings may be called by the Chair, Deputy Chair or at the request of three other members
of the Working Group, when this is considered necessary to address an issue of urgent matter.
c. A draft agenda will be circulated to members of the Working Group at least five days before the regular
monthly meeting, giving the members the opportunity to suggest additional items for discussion.
d. Draft minutes will be circulated within one week of the meeting. The final minutes will additionally be
circulated to GBV working groups in the field.
3. Reporting
a. Members of the Working Group will submit a monthly brief report to the Chair, at the latest one week
before the regular meeting.
b. The reports will highlight the protection issues the members and their field counterparts are addressing,
the challenges they are facing and highlight any issues that require action by the AGBV Working Group.
These issues will be discussed at the monthly meeting of the Working Group.
A45
c. For the same purposes, the Chairs of provincial and/or regional GBV working groups, as well as the field
focal points, will submit monthly brief reports to the Chair of the AGBV Working Group, at the latest one
week before the regular monthly meeting.
d. The AGBV is a sub-working group of the Afghanistan Protection Cluster (APC) and, as such, the Chair
of the AGBV Working Group will report monthly to the APC on the relevant issues raised in all received
reports, as well as on any decisions and actions taken.
Sample TOR-Afghanistan
The Chair of the AGBV Working Group will participate in the meetings of the APC and may request the
assistance of the APC on any particular issue.
1. In line with the TOR of the APC and identified responsibilities, the Working Group will consolidate,
coordinate, improve and support the efforts and activities of all relevant stakeholders in the prevention of and
response to GBV, within the context of humanitarian action in Afghanistan through:
a. Mapping and updating relevant GBV prevention and response actors in focus areas (who, what, where);
b. Ensuring that analyses are carried out on the GBV situations in focus areas and documented for all actors
to use;
c. Establishing reporting and monitoring mechanisms to ensure coordination of efforts and activities of
members and relevant stakeholders;
d. Assisting in the collection and analysis of age- and sex disaggregated data and train actors as needed;
e. Providing a forum for sharing information on activities, identifying needs and gaps in prevention and
response, as well as for planning GBV inter-agency activities;
f. Engaging in inter-agency, multi-sectoral field missions to assess programming successes and challenges
and identify gaps in GBV programming;
g. Providing technical support to national authorities and NGOs in the setting up of referral systems to
V. Amendments
This TOR is a working document and may be altered to meet the current needs of all members (at national
Sample TOR-Afghanistan
I. Introduction
Protecting women and girls from gender-based violence in Northern Uganda requires both short and
longer-term efforts and strategies and is dependent on the active commitment of all actors. In the short-
term there is an immediate need to deliver emergency response for survivors of sexual violence and to
minimize the risk of ongoing violence through humanitarian action. A second, but related, objective is
to integrate emergency/humanitarian GBV interventions into national government and non-government
structures to support longer-term, sustained structural, systemic and service interventions that protect all
Ugandan women and girls from gender-based violence.
In line with identified cluster-lead terms of reference and responsibilities and with the Protection of Persons
Displaced in Northern Uganda strategy paper (June 06), the GBV Sub-Cluster Working Group at national
level will strengthen emergency GBV response and prevention in Northern Uganda through:
1. Developing a joint action plan that delivers a set of minimum multisectoral interventions to prevent and
respond to sexual and domestic violence in Northern Uganda.
A46
2. Identifying and coordinating activities identified in the joint action plan with all partners at the national
level, including delineating roles and responsibilities based on agency mandates and comparative
advantages.
Sample TOR-N.Uganda
3. Supporting district-level implementation of the action plan.
5. Identifying and addressing capacity gaps and ensuring all actors are working in line with accepted
GBV prevention and response standards (standard definitions, methodologies, protocols, etc.).
6. Acting as an information clearing house and advocacy forum for the purpose of
• improving data collection and analysis of the nature and scale of sexual and other gender-based
violence in Northern Uganda
• identifying and addressing immediate GBV protection issues in IDP settings.
7. Providing technical support to all clusters for sector-specific service design and delivery to maximize
protection of women and girls.
8. Mobilizing all partners around preventing sexual exploitation and abuse by humanitarian actors.
9. Linking with relevant national structures to enable transition between humanitarian and development
actions to address gender-based violence in Uganda.
IDENTIFICATION
Region covered: National with particular emphasis on Darfur region including the three Darfurs
Sector covered: Protection/Gender Based Violence
RATIONALE / JUSTIFICATION
In an increasingly unpredictable and volatile security context, where perpetrators of violence against
women and men operate with relative impunity, and socio-cultural attitudes towards rape survivors
permit lifelong stigmatization, handling Gender Based Violence (GBV) within the Darfur context requires
a well thought through, sensitive, highly coordinated and systematic approach. An effective GBV strategy
must contain three core elements – prevention/mitigation, response and coordination. Without strong
interagency coordination it is not possible to achieve the required multi-sectoral approach for an effective
humanitarian response to GBV.
Response to GBV by the actors (NGOs, UN, GOS) has been constrained overall by a number of factors:
• A general lack of awareness throughout the humanitarian community (Sudanese and
international) of the complex implications of GBV, particularly rape of women, within this cultural
context. Our strategy must, therefore, be informed by analysis, understanding and best practice
principles.
A47
• The limited number of actors to respond with adequate, coordinated preventive and response
services.
• The escalating insecurity, its unpredictability and lack of effective protective response
Sample TOR-Sudan
• The inadequacy of the Sudanese law enforcement and legal system to respond in a manner that
is supportive of the survivor and pursues the perpetrators through due process.
Principle actors responding to date have included a number of key NGOs1 and UN agencies2. Coordination
has recently become more action oriented and a GBV strategic framework, informed by a more in-
depth cultural and contextual understanding, is in the process of being put in place by the Darfur GBV
Coordination structure that confirms priorities and clarifies roles. Critical for an effective response will be
increasing our capacity on the ground to provide needed services in a coordinated fashion. These include
widespread awareness raising, clinical response, individual and family emotional support, community
support, referral, law enforcement support, economic and social activity support, reporting and trends
analysis, quality control monitoring, etc. At present, most players acknowledge that despite our dedicated
responses to date we have only touched the tip of the iceberg. Donor and GOS support will be needed to
considerably expand our response.
Through increasingly systematic coordination, provision of technical support, and advocacy at the State
and Federal levels, expand and maximize existing NGO, UN and GOS capacities to respond to GBV.
1
These include IRC, SCF/UK and USA, World Vision, MSFs, MDM, GRC, NRC, NCA,CARE.
This should not be taken as an exhaustive list as there may be others responding to GBV.
2
UNMIS and UN agencies include UNICEF, UNHCR, UNDP, UNIFEM, FAO, OCHA, UNFPA.
1. Facilitate access and advocacy to the GOS at both State and Federal levels for problem solving, reducing
barriers, clarifying, strategizing and increasing general awareness of GBV prevention and response
mechanisms
2. Advocate to the relevant UN structures (UNCT, JIM3, Khartoum Protection Steering Group, etc.) and
donors on behalf of the GBV Core Group on critical gaps and issues related to GBV response, e.g.
security, impunity, legal policies, etc.
3. Improve access to relevant information4 to support operations, advocacy and awareness raising needs
4. Promote best practice in the emergence of a shared vision and strategic framework, integrated
strategies, coordinated activities, and common protocols.
COORDINATION ACTIVITIES
The activities described below are specific to supporting effective coordination at both State and
Khartoum levels, as well as between these levels and between the states.
Coordination with the GOS - Advocacy and coordination with Government of Sudan is critical since the
IDP crisis is ultimately within the responsibility and sovereignty of the State.
a. Provide technical support at all levels in the GoS, including State Committees, Wali Advisors,
and the Unit to Combat Violence against Women and Children.
b. Ensure a level of inclusion of all relevant parties in strategizing and planning for GBV response
by inviting the GoS to meetings, calling for meetings, ensuring all the relevant parties are
A47
around the table.
c. Assemble information and conduct briefings as required.
d. Support general awareness-raising, particularly around international commemorative
Sample TOR-Sudan
occasions (IWD, 16 Days of Activism, Human Rights Day).
Coordination within the UN system and with NGOs – The UN and NGOs working on GBV prevention
and response have adopted a five pillar framework for programming and coordination, identifying pillar
leads and developing clear work plans at the state level. This facilitates a clear division of responsibility
amongst UN agencies addressing GBV that is complementary and responsive. Ongoing coordination
entails:
a. Coordinating the preparation of GBV related briefs on issues or positions related to key
operational constraints to GBV response, persistent violations of human rights, rising
insecurity, impunity, etc. for presentation and discussion within the Protection Steering
Group and UN structures for intervention with the GOS.
b. Assembling best practice guides, training manuals and other resources and ensuring access
by GBV actors
c. Advocating within the UN Country Team for resource allocations commensurate with the
scope of the GBV problem
3
JIM is the UN, Donor and GOS Joint Implementation and Monitoring group focused on Darfur
4
Such information could include best practice guides and manuals, situation reports, studies, local technical resources,
networks and institutes, directories, laws related to GBV, etc.
Section Six: Annexes 311
d. Facilitating linkages between UN agencies and the field around GBV issues and ensuring
guiding principles are respected and adopted.
e. Ensuring priority gaps are identified and realistic priorities are set within the coordination
structure
f. Facilitating problem-solving and strategic decision-making on ways forward
g. Supporting the roll-out and adoption of IASC guidelines on GBV
h. Providing technical assistance and guidance as needed
i. Providing resources to undertake critical studies or assessments needed to develop
appropriate strategies and to inform the piloting and development of response models
j. Preparing analytical situation reports on GBV topics for use in advocacy efforts
UNFPA’s Role
UNFPA’s response teams in the three Darfurs are currently convening GBV Working Groups, programming
around GBV awareness-raising and prevention, as well as addressing reproductive health response to the
needs of women through partners (NGOs and SMOH).
A. Coordination:
1) Mobilising technical support, guidance and information to the field in response to their operational
and strategic needs and to ensure capacity building. UNFPA to work with each pillar lead according to
A47
1) Ensure regular coordination meetings are held, minuted, and followed up at both Khartoum and
field level, that all minutes of the CG are shared with the KPSG, and field-based WGs. This will ensure
action points are fed through and picked up for quick response at the appropriate level within the GBV
coordination system.
2) Distribute minutes in a timely fashion.
3) Ensure smooth communication between central and field levels, by collecting, consolidating and
disseminating required information between Khartoum and the field.
4) Provide strategic and technical guidance to field-based WGs and ensure a consistent approach
throughout Darfur.
5) Organize biannual strategy meetings and produce strategic planning reports and documentation for
distribution.
6) Maintain website and/or burn CDs with key and current documents and reports related to GBV.
A47
Sample TOR-Sudan
Objectives
The Gender-Based Violence (GBV) Sub-Cluster in Kenya aims, in collaboration with and in support of
the Government of Kenya, to consolidate and coordinate the activities of all relevant stakeholders to
improve and support the prevention of and response to GBV amongst populations affected by Kenya’s
post-election violence.
Gender-based violence as defined in the IASC Guidelines for Addressing Gender-Based Violence in
Humanitarian Settings “is an umbrella term for any harmful act that is perpetrated against a person’s will,
and that is based on socially ascribed (gender) differences between male and females”.
The GBV Sub-Cluster aims to consider all types of gender-based violence in its coordination, planning
and advocacy activities but will give special emphasis to addressing sexual violence in the current
emergency.
Membership
Membership is open to all organizations, media representatives and donors working on or funding any
A48
aspects of gender-based violence prevention and response in relation to the Kenya post-election crisis.
Membership will/should include government representatives, international and national nongovernmental
organizations, the Red Cross movement, United Nations agencies and other international organizations.
Sample TOR-Kenya
Responsibilities
Cluster Chair
UNFPA, as Cluster Chair, will abide by the cluster lead mandate and responsibilities as outlined in the
IASC TOR for cluster leads, including:
- Establish and maintain coordination mechanisms and chair coordination meetings and ensure
that appropriate stakeholders are continuously engaged in the cluster meetings and activities
(i.e., Ministry of Health, Justice, Gender, Gender Commission, Internal Affairs and Education)
- Ensure utilization of participatory and community-based approaches
- Ensure mainstreaming of HIV/AIDS and gender concerns
- Ensure effective and coherent sectoral needs assessments and analysis
- Ensure appropriate planning and strategy development (identification of gaps, etc)
- Ensure application of standards that exist (national protocols, existing policy guidance, etc)
- Monitoring and Evaluation
- Advocacy and resource mobilization with a special focus on meeting the needs of the most
vulnerable, in particular people with disabilities
- Training and capacity-building as needed
- Act as a provider of last resort
Members
- Regularly attend GBV Sub-Cluster meeting
- Coordinate and share information about activities and the field challenges encountered
- Agree to follow guiding principles for ethical GBV programming
Confidentiality
Identifying information related to GBV cases will not be revealed in the GBV Sub-Cluster meetings to
ensure the right to privacy of the survivor is respected, following the principles set out in the UNHCR
314 Section Six: Annexes
Guidelines on Gender-based Violence Prevention and Response Among Displaced Populations (2003).
Priorities
• Coordination in order to strengthen and formalize GBV response efforts
• Information-sharing of programming activities to in order to identify gaps, build coalitions and
reduce the likelihood of replication of programming
• Advocacy to stimulate support for GBV prevention and response activities
• Advocacy and capacity-building efforts to ensure that media activities are not harmful to efforts
related to GBV prevention and response
• Sharing of tools, training resources, awareness raising materials, studies and available research
• Facilitate gender desegregated documentation in order to identify lessons learned and best
practices
• Develop a standardized response to GBV for members of the cluster
• Coordination with provincial level GBV working groups, with an emphasis on information-sharing
from meeting outcomes at the national level with provincial groups and vice versa.
Further contact
Florence Gachanja, UNFPA Kenya Country Office
Jennifer Miquel, UNFPA Regional Emergency RH Coordinator
Queen Katembu, GBV Advisor and Chair
A48
To be put on the GBV Sub-Cluster mailing list, please contact GBV Sub-Cluster secretary Evelyn Ongige
Sample TOR-Kenya
Sector: Health
Sector Lead: UNFPA/WHO
Goal: GBV survivors have improved access to information and quality health services
A49
GBV services X X SMOH, South Darfur Information
mapping includes NGOs, about which
information about UNFPA health clinics
which health provide
-- including
as relates to
health care
Identify problems X X X X Issues
and issues from identified to
case work, and address gaps
discuss in GBV and actions
Working Group to follow up,
and information- documented
sharing forums in meeting
minutes
I. Background
Gender-based violence takes many forms and includes rape, sexual exploitation, sexual assault and abuse,
forced sex and other types of sexual violence, domestic violence, trafficking of women and girls, forced
prostitution, sexual harassment and discrimination, and denial of rights. It also encompasses forms of
violence that are specific to cultures and societies, such as female genital mutilation, widow inheritance and
early and forced marriage. It is a gross violation of women and girl’s human rights and is also a significant
public health issue; the relationship between GBV and HIV/AIDS, for example, is clearly established and
demands a concerted response in terms of both prevention and response. Gender-based violence is also
increasingly being recognized as an inhibitor to development.
During armed conflict women and girls are particularly vulnerable to gender-based violence, including all
forms of sexual violence. Recent assessments conducted in Kenya indicate that displaced women and girls
not only fear sexual exploitation and assault but are experiencing other types of gender-based violence as
well. Vulnerability to exploitation and abuse by virtue of their age and gender is further increased by the
post-election conflict and the prevailing humanitarian and security conditions.2 Conflict can also exacerbate
harmful cultural practices, such as forced and early marriages, when parents do not have the resources to
take care of their children. Understanding the causal relations between vulnerability of women and girls,
types of gender-based violence and different phases of the conflict is therefore an essential pre-requisite
for defining appropriate response.
In times of peace as well as in times of conflict, sexual violence, including rape, sexual assault and
exploitation, is under-reported. Survivors do not speak out because of fear, risk of ongoing violence,
A50
shame, social stigma and lack of services that fully respect their confidentiality, rights, wishes, choices and
dignity. For these reasons, available service data from displaced communities in Kenya likely reflect only a
small percentage of incidents perpetrated.
2. Systemic level (secondary protection): systems and strategies to monitor and respond when
those rights are breached (statutory and traditional legal/ justice systems, health care systems,
social welfare systems and community mechanisms);
3. Operative level (tertiary protection): direct services to meet the needs of women and girls who
have been abused.
Addressing gender-based violence among IDP communities in Kenya therefore requires: measures to
protect women’s and girl’s rights; actions for intervention when those rights are breached; and services and
programmes to meet the needs of women and girls who have suffered violence.
Responding to sexual violence in particular requires significant sensitivity. Whilst there is a need for
information on the scale and scope of sexual violence for advocacy and programme-planning purposes,
there are significant ethical and programmatic constraints to the way in which incident-related data is
collected and disseminated. Furthermore, women’s reasons for not taking up certain services post-incident
must be understood and respected by all actors, and all response interventions must be implemented in a
manner which fully respects the confidentiality, rights, wishes, choices and dignity of survivors.
1
Adapted from template provided by GBV colleagues in Uganda.
2
Response programmes should also take into account the fact that men and boys can also be victims of sexual violence.
3
In Read-Hamilton (2004), adapted from A. Jamrozic and L. Nocella (1998) The Sociology of Social Problems: Theoretical
Perspectives and Methods of Intervention, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.
Section Six: Annexes 319
Successfully protecting internally displaced women and girls from gender-based violence in Kenya is
dependent on the active commitment of, and collaboration between, all actors, including male and female
community members. Gender-based violence is a cross-cutting issue, and no one authority, organization
or agency alone possesses the knowledge, skills, resources or mandate to respond to the complex needs
of survivors of violence or to tackle the task of preventing violence against women and girls, yet all have a
responsibility to work together to address this serious human rights and public health problem.
The strategy reflects the short-term humanitarian imperative to deliver a response for survivors of sexual
violence and to minimize the risk of ongoing violence through humanitarian action, as well as the need to
transition programming approaches from humanitarian relief to integrated early recovery by strengthening
national government and non-government structures (NGOs/FBOs/CBOs) to support medium to longer-
term, sustained structural, systemic and service interventions that protect women and girls from gender-
based violence in accordance with Kenyan law and international legal obligations.
Gender-based violence prevention and response intervention in IDP communities and return areas in
Kenya must take into account the context both across and within conflict-affected districts and provinces,
reflecting different population movement patterns and the related changing humanitarian and human rights
situation. Therefore the GBV strategy is premised on a number of factors:
GBV Strategy/Action Plan-Kenya
► Humanitarian interventions should target the most vulnerable populations. Due to their increased
vulnerability by virtue of both their sex and particular circumstances that heighten vulnerability, certain
groups of women and girls are more likely to need ongoing relief-oriented service delivery to reduce
the risk of their exposure to gender-based violence (e.g., female-headed households, females with
disabilities, elderly women and unaccompanied women and girls).
► GBV prevention and response interventions must link relief to early recovery programming, whilst
not compromising the availability of services to women while they remain in IDP settings or during the
return process – a time which can render women even more vulnerable to violence. Linked to the above
is the assumption that certain groups of women are less likely to immediately benefit from population
movements out of camps, and therefore service delivery in camps must continue whilst women are there.
► There is need for expanded delivery of humanitarian GBV prevention and response interventions
in accordance with need, as well as directing efforts to support district and provincial administrative
structures responsible for protecting women and girls from gender-based violence, including officers from
the Ministries of Health, Justice, Gender and Education, the Gender Commission and Internal Affairs.
► Program planning and implementation must reflect each district’s different circumstances vis-à-vis
population movement, security, deployment and coverage of district and provincial authorities, etc.
► Efforts to address structural and systemic protection for women and girls must simultaneously be
prioritized, including advocacy for enforcement of existing laws on GBV and for law reform.
The following strategy has been developed in line with the GBV Sub-Cluster responsibilities identified
in the GBV Sub-Cluster terms of reference and should serve to reinforce key international and national
guidelines for addressing gender and GBV, such as: the Kenyan National Guidelines on Medical
Management of Rape/Sexual Violence, the IASC Gender Handbook for Humanitarian Action, the IASC
The strategy of the GBV Sub-Cluster is to address both immediate humanitarian service delivery and action
to prevent and respond to GBV, as well as longer-term development of services, systems and structures to
protect women and girls from gender-based violence. With regard to the latter objective, the strategy can
reinforce the work of the Gender Commission on developing a GBV policy for Kenya.
The GBV Sub-Cluster will therefore establish linkages with the National Steering Committee, tasked to
develop a National Strategic Framework to address GBV, and work with all relevant actors in Kenya to:
I. Deliver a set of minimum interventions to prevent and respond to sexual violence in line with the IASC
Guidelines for Gender-Based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Settings and other international and
national policies, resources and guidelines.
II. Transition humanitarian interventions to national government and non-government structures (NGOs/
FBOs/CBOs) to enable the shift from humanitarian to development actions, as displaced populations
move to transitional settlements in some areas and home in others.
In order to achieve the above, the following activities will be prioritized by GBV Sub- Cluster actors:
1. Coordination
• National level: with the aim of strengthening the coordination framework and building
A50
response capacity, addressing capacity gaps and ensuring all actors are working in line
with accepted GBV prevention and response standards, ensuring linkages across and
technical support to other clusters, mobilizing resources, advocating on GBV related
issues;
Response:
- Capacity-building of service providers and NGOs/FBOs/CBOs to respond to sexual violence
by training community leaders, police, legal, medical, reproductive health and psychosocial
service providers on systems and protocols for responding to sexual and domestic violence
and on working with survivors;
Prevention:
- Community mobilization against sexual and domestic violence.
GBV Strategy/Action Plan-Kenya
While prioritizing these activities, particular attention should be given to the following cross-cutting issues:
• Promoting gender equality and gender mainstreaming as key components of addressing GBV;
• Supporting participatory approaches;
• Engaging men and young males;
• Engaging girls;
• Mobilizing the media;
• Addressing GBV in schools;
• Conducting outreach to the most vulnerable, particularly those with disabilities.
The following table outlines activities that need to be undertaken in order to prevent and respond to GBV
among IDP populations in Kenya. This framework will inform development of district-level action plans to
address GBV.
and protect women’s rights, while taking into women in health, legal, judicial and social welfare
account the unique challenges faced by people sectors
with disability in relation to GBV
Advocacy and technical support for substantive and
Interagency and inter-sectoral training on human procedural law reform
rights, women’s rights and GBV, international
standards, national laws and practices Prioritize areas for policy and guideline development
with Ministries of Health, Justice, Social Services,
Awareness-raising on human rights and women’s Education and other relevant government agencies
rights for traditional leaders and communities
Education on human rights and women’s rights for
Human rights violations monitoring and traditional leaders, teachers and other ‘duty bearers’
information dissemination for advocacy and to encourage change in practices that condone or
action perpetuate violence against women and girls
A50
Rights violations monitoring and information
dissemination for advocacy and action
Establish integrated health, protection and Code of Conduct, reporting and investigation system
Assess and address age and gender-related Education and training for government and non-
risks and vulnerabilities in camp settings government (NGOs/FBOs/CBOs) service providers in
health care, legal and protection systems, psychosocial
Technical support for sector-specific intervention care and education sector
design and delivery to maximize systemic
SYSTEMIC LEVEL
safety for women and girls (shelter and site Technical support and advocacy to health, social
management, food and water distribution, social welfare, police and justice and education systems at
services, etc.), while taking into account unique both policy and practice levels
challenges faced by people with disabilities in
relation to GBV Coordinate and support integrated health, protection,
psychosocial and legal/justice response
Develop and disseminate Information, Education
and Communication (IEC) guidelines to ensure Monitor sector-specific interventions to ensure ongoing
that all awareness-raising materials meet safety and protection, while taking into account unique
appropriate ethical, technical and context-specific challenges faced by people with disabilities in relation to
standards GBV
Develop and disseminate case management Establish data-collection systems and monitor ongoing
guidelines that include a set of agreed-upon incidents
forms to facilitate appropriate response and data
collection
Engage communities in participatory processes Comprehensive case management care and support
to identify strengths, to help communities addressing physical, emotional, psychological and social
prevent violence, and identify positive coping consequences of GBV
mechanisms to support for survivors
INDIVIDUAL.COMMUNITY LEVEL
Case management of survivors, including Psychosocial: Culturally-specific support for individual and
immediate emotional support, information, groups of women to assist with coping and social integration
advocacy, safety and referral and plan for the
provision of culturally appropriate psychosocial Protection: Locally appropriate protection and safety options
support
Legal/Justice: Access to legal recourse where requested,
including linkage with police and courts and court support
Indicators
Protocols that are aligned with international standards have been established for the clinical management of sexual violence
survivors within the emergency area at all levels of the health system
The proportion of sexual violence cases for which legal action has been taken
The proportion of organizations with codes of conduct on SEA and referral and reporting mechanisms in place
Establish coordination mechanisms and orientation of partners from all levels, including government and CBOs.
Percent of rape survivors who report to health facilities/workers within 72 hours who receive appropriate medical care
Proportion of sexual violence survivors who report 72 hours or more after the incident who receive a basic set of
psychosocial and medical services
Number of activities initiated by community members targeted at the prevention and response of sexual violence of women
and girls
Proportion of women and girls who demonstrate knowledge of available services, why and when they would be accessed
A50
(ECODEV)
Save the Children
Education Centre for Women in Democracy UNDP
(ECWD)
UNFPA
Family Health Options Kenya (FHOK)
I. Background
Gender-based violence takes many forms and includes rape, sexual exploitation, sexual assault and
abuse, domestic violence, trafficking of women and girls, forced prostitution, sexual harassment and
discrimination. It also encompasses forms of violence that are specific to cultures and societies, such as
female genital mutilation, widow inheritance and early and forced marriage.
The most commonly reported form of GBV in Northern Uganda is domestic violence; although reports on
cases of grave violence (rape, defilement and sexual assault) are of equal and serious concern.
Globally, sexual violence, including rape, sexual assault and exploitation, is under-reported. Survivors do
not speak out because of fear, risk of ongoing violence, shame, social stigma and lack of services that
fully respect their confidentiality, rights, wishes, choices and dignity. Therefore, all actors must assume and
believe that sexual violence is under-reported in Northern Uganda.
For effective GBV prevention, response and coordination in Northern Uganda, systemic and individual
protections are institutionalized.1 These levels are:
1. Structural level: preventative measures to ensure rights are recognized and protected (through
international, statutory and traditional laws and policies)
A51
2. Systemic level: systems and strategies to monitor and respond when those rights are breached
(statutory and traditional legal/ justice systems, health care systems, social welfare systems and
community-based mechanisms)
GBV Strategy/Action Plan-Uganda
3. Operative level: direct services to meet the needs of women and girls who have been abused
Addressing gender-based violence in Northern Uganda therefore requires: measures to promote and
protect women’s and girl’s rights; actions for intervention when those rights are breached; and services
and programmes to meet the needs of women and girls who have suffered violence.
Successful GBV prevention, response and coordination in Northern Uganda is dependent on the active
commitment of, and collaboration between, all actors, including government; non-government; male and
female community members.
II. Purpose of this document
This document outlines the strategy of the GBV Sub-Cluster at the national level and in districts of Northern
Uganda. The strategy reflects the immediate humanitarian imperative to save lives and prevent further
harm -- as well as the priority to transition programming and coordination from humanitarian to integrated
recovery by strengthening national government and community-based structures. Recovery frameworks
and priorities will support medium- to longer-term, sustained structural, systemic and service interventions
that protect women and girls from gender-based violence in accordance with Uganda’s obligations under
international and national law.
Gender-based violence prevention, response and coordination in Northern Uganda must take into account
the context both across and within conflict-affected districts, reflecting patterns of population movement
and the related early recovery/recovery context. Therefore the GBV strategy is shaped by a number of
policies and factors:
► Humanitarian/life saving interventions should target the most vulnerable populations – due
to their increased vulnerability by virtue of both their sex and particular circumstances that heighten
1
Adapted from A. Jamrozic and L. Nocella (1998) The Sociology of Social Problems: Theoretical Perspectives and Methods of
Intervention, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.
► GBV prevention and response interventions and coordination mechanisms shall be shaped by
national and local government plans, guidelines and policies: including the Government of Uganda’s
Peace, Recovery, and Development Plan (PRDP) and the OPM’s Parish Approach.
► Programme planning, implementation and coordination must reflect each district’s different
circumstances and capacity vis a vis population movement, security, deployment and coverage of district
and sub-county level authorities, etc.
The following strategy has been developed in line IASC Cluster Policy and architecture in Uganda, the
IASC GBV Guidelines, Uganda Protection Cluster Strategy, the Government of Uganda’s PRDP, the OPM’s
Parish Approach, the National Gender Policy, the National IDP Policy and reflects the contextual issues
identified above.
The strategy of the GBV Sub-Cluster is to both target actions to prevent GBV and to provide service
delivery (response), as well as longer-term development of services, systems and structures to ensure
GBV prevention, response and coordination is realized through central and local government counterparts.
A51
The GBV Sub-Cluster will therefore work with all relevant actors to:
I. Deliver a set of minimum interventions to prevent and respond to GBV in line with the IASC
II. Short/medium term: targeted capacity-building of central and local government systems and
community-based structures.
Longer term: transfer multi-sectoral GBV prevention, response and coordination to central and
local government systems and community-based structures.
In order to achieve the above, the following activities will be prioritized by GBV Sub-Cluster actors:
1. Coordination
Promote and support the expansion and strengthening of GBV systems from sub-county level and
onwards, through:
• Development and roll-out of harmonised GBV standards, tools and guidelines across
districts.
• Development and monitoring of IASC/MoGLSD capacity-building programme targeting
multi-sectoral local government and community based structures addressing GBV.
• Technical support to clusters and sector working groups to maximise protection of
women and girls and sector-specific service delivery/response including Gender, Health,
Education; and Justice, Law and Order.
• Intra-cluster coordination and joint planning with Protection Cluster members; Child
Protection and Human Rights/Rule of Law sub-clusters members.
V. GBV Sub-Cluster National Annual Work plan (2008) for Northern Uganda
Appendix A.
A51
GBV Strategy/Action Plan-Uganda
MAIN OBJECTIVE
To prevent and respond to GBV in line with IASC guidelines and strengthen government and non-
government structures, systems and services to promote and protect women’s and girls’ rights in relation
to GBV.
Strengthen i) develop national i) one training a) form a training 1st quarter training sub- Kampala
GBV training standards; toolkit (standards, sub-committee/ national level committee
prevention a harmonized references, etc) taskforce training manual members,
and response approach for a joint IASC/GoU DSW, UNICEF,
capacity of multi-sectoral GBV national training UNIFEM, Raising
duty-bearers stakeholders and product Voices, UNFPA,
and service duty bearers MoGLSD
providers at
the district and
sub-county
levels
A51
b) identify the target 3rd quarter training sub- Kampala
audience for the committee
training c) desk members,
review and gaps UNFPA,
ii) M&E plan for ii) training strategy / e) develop one 2nd - 3rd quarter training sub- Kampala
training developed product M&E in place M&E strategy committee
members,
UNFPA,
MoGLSD, DSW
Northern Uganda
GBV related activities/
priorities
ii) integrate GBV ii) adequately 3rd quarter UNFPA, UNDP, Kampala
GBV Strategy/Action Plan-Uganda
Promote one workshop held i) one two-to- i) assist with 2nd - 3rd quarter UNFPA, Kampala
accountability for multi-sectoral three day inter- selecting invitees; MoGLSD, Sub
and provide government actors governmental, ii) contribute cluster members
psychosocial, on GBV, including multi-sectoral (health, to agenda and
health, key gaps and justice, law and order, content; iii) co-
medical, legal recommendations social development, facilitate relevant
and safety finance, local sections of the
services for government) GBV workshop and next
survivors who workshop held with steps
wish to access contributions from
them sub-cluster members
to agenda, content
A51
and facilitation
GBV presentations/ i) at least one i) decide on 2nd - 4th quarter UNFPA, Kampala
consultations GBV sub-cluster targeted multi- MoGLSD, Sub
held with target presentation/ sectoral audiences; cluster members
A51
GBV reports, reports, research, data collected from GBV sub cluster and Northern
assessments, assessements and 2006 to present; & District GBV Uganda
research and data data (collected to ii) collect reports, working groups districts
are compiled and date) are collected research and
1) To establish and coordinate set of minimum multi-sectoral interventions to prevent and respond to
gender-based violence in IDP communities and return areas in xxxx District in line with the IASC
Guidelines for Gender-Based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Settings.
This includes:
Response:
i. To ensure a functioning referral and case management system are in place to enable
access to services for survivors addressing physical, emotional, psychological and social
consequences of GBV including:
- Medical: Medical examination and treatment as per standardized WHO guidelines on clinical
management of rape
- Psychosocial: Support for individual and groups of women to assist with coping and social
integration
- Protection: Locally appropriate protection and safety options
- Legal/Justice: Access to legal recourse where requested
ii. Ensure all services are based on respect for the confidentiality, rights, wishes, choices and
dignity of survivors
A52
Prevention:
i. Capacity-building of all humanitarian actors to prevent sexual violence and exploitation
through awareness-raising and capacity-building for protective programming. This includes
N. Uganda 2008 GBV Working Groups TOR
providing technical support to all clusters for sector- specific service design and delivery to
maximize protection of women and girls.
ii. Coordinate community education and mobilization efforts to promote and protect women and
girls rights and to de-stigmatize survivors
2) To ethically collect, analyze and disseminate data related to reported cases and use it to identify
and address gender-based violence through action and advocacy
3) To coordinate technical support and capacity-building to all response partners including police,
security actors, health and psychosocial service providers
1. Face the speaker. Sit up straight or lean forward slightly to show your attentiveness through body
language.
2. Maintain eye contact, to the degree that you all remain comfortable.
3. Minimize external distractions. Turn off the TV. Put down your book or magazine, and ask the speaker
and other listeners to do the same.
4. Respond appropriately to show that you understand. Murmur (“uh-huh” and “um-hmm”) and nod.
Raise your eyebrows. Say words such as “Really,” “Interesting,” as well as more direct prompts: “What
did you do then?” and “What did she say?”
5. Focus solely on what the speaker is saying. Try not to think about what you are going to say next. The
conversation will follow a logical flow after the speaker makes her point.
6. Minimize internal distractions. If your own thoughts keep horning in, simply let them go and
continuously re-focus your attention on the speaker, much as you would during meditation.
A53
7. Keep an open mind. Wait until the speaker is finished before deciding that you disagree. Try not to
make assumptions about what the speaker is thinking.
9. Even if the speaker is launching a complaint against you, wait until they finish to defend yourself. The
speaker will feel as though their point had been made. They won’t feel the need to repeat it, and you’ll
know the whole argument before you respond. Research shows that, on average, we can hear four times
faster than we can talk, so we have the ability to sort ideas as they come in…and be ready for more.
10. Engage yourself. Ask questions for clarification, but, once again, wait until the speaker has finished.
That way, you won’t interrupt their train of thought. After you ask questions, paraphrase their point to
make sure you didn’t misunderstand. Start with: “So you’re saying…”
Date:
Name:
Organization:
Job Title:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
2. Two versions of this handbook have been distributed during the pilot process. The first version has the annexes
available both in hard copy within the handbook and on a CD. The second version does not include a hard copy of the
annexes. Which version of the handbook do you have?
Full version (with annexes included in the hard copy and on CD)
Shortened version (with annexes available only on the CD, not in hard copy)
3. Do you have a preference for whether the annexes should be included in the hard copy of the handbook or only on
the CD?
337
4. Do you have any other recommendations regarding the overall design of the handbook? What would you change to
make it more user-friendly?
5. Please indicate with a checkmark which sections of this handbook you have read.
6. Please indicate with a checkmark which sections of this handbook were most useful to you.
7. Please indicate with a checkmark which sections of this handbook were least useful to you.
338
8. What additional information would make the handbook more relevant and useful for your work?
9. What coordination tools and skills/tips have you and/or your organization learned and used from this
handbook?
10. Do you have additional tools/references that you recommend to be included in the handbook?
(If yes, please describe below and forward the tools to [email protected].)
11. Please provide any additional comments that will assist us in revising this handbook in order to more
effectively meet your GBV coordination needs.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR FEEDBACK! IT WILL HELP US TO IMPROVE THIS HANDBOOK IN
ORDER TO BETTER MEET YOUR NEEDS.
339