FAFEN-Preliminary-Report-General-Election-2018 11 PDF
FAFEN-Preliminary-Report-General-Election-2018 11 PDF
FAFEN-Preliminary-Report-General-Election-2018 11 PDF
In
addition, the nomination fee is not refundable under the provisions of the new law. While the
measure might have been meant to encourage only serious contenders to stand for
elections, it may also have negatively impacted the ability of financially weaker segments
of society to take part in elections. Equally important will be strengthening further the process
of nomination on reserved seats for minorities and women in order to ensure that the elected
representatives on these seats can best represent the interest of the marginalized groups.
The election campaign lasted 22 days after the publication of Form-33 (Final List of
Contesting Candidates), six days less than the legal sanction of at least a 28-day campaign
period under the Elections Law, 2017. The reduced number of days may be a result of the
changes the Election Commission had to make in the nomination forms on the directions of
the Lahore High Court. The Court reenacted several disclosures relating to nationality,
finances, taxes and pending criminal charges, etc. that had been eliminated under the new
law. The court directions compelled rescheduling in the nomination process, pushing the
date a few days ahead for the publication of Form-33 as initially stipulated in the election
programme issued on May 31, 2018.
The election campaign that followed lacked the traditional hue and colors and was
relatively lackluster as candidates faced tougher enforcement of stricter formalities notified
by the Election Commission under the Code of Conduct for Political Parties and Contesting
Candidates. The code criminalizes billboards, wall chalking and panaflexes and limits the use
of loudspeakers only for election meetings. Candidates may use only banners, posters,
portraits and pamphlets of prescribed sizes for campaigning. Exploiting religious and
sectarian sentiments for canvassing and holding campaign activities at places of worship
were also prohibited under the elections law and the Code of Conduct.
The ECP established as many as 594 monitoring committees comprising senior government
officials to monitor the election campaign in all districts and report violations of the Code of
Conduct to relevant District Monitoring Officers (DMOs), who were authored to levy a fine of
up to Rs. 50,000. In case of repeated violations, the Election Commission is also empowered
to disqualify a candidate from the race, which was a strong deterrent. While the Election
Commission disqualified one candidate (later restored by a High Court), FAFEN interviews
with DMOs in 89 districts documented instances of 1,855 warnings and 143 fine impositions to
candidates. Cases of 428 candidates who committed repeated violations were referred to
the Election Commission for the initiation of further proceedings. However, the ECP website
does not provide any details of its effective monitoring exercise.
Based on its observation of adherence to the Code of Conduct by candidates in 6,519
electoral areas in 244 National Assembly constituencies, FAFEN documented 577 instances
of oversized posters, banners, pamphlets and portraits; 1,143 instances of the use of banned
campaign tactics including billboards, panaflex and wall-chalking; 202 instances of the use
of government buildings for display of party campaign materials; and 227 instances of the
use of mosques for election campaigns. However, police were observed to remove banned
campaign materials, and materials illegally placed on government buildings, etc.
11