Transportation of Ammonia Risk Analysis
Transportation of Ammonia Risk Analysis
Transportation of Ammonia Risk Analysis
5C
Aqueous ammonia will be transported to the project site using U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT) approved tanker trucks. However, the transportation of ammonia,
and any other hazardous material, poses a risk of exposure to the surrounding population
due to an accidental release caused by a traffic accident involving the delivery vehicle.
An aqueous ammonia leak occurring during delivery or transport of the material to the
CECP storage tanks could result in hazardous ambient concentrations in the immediate
vicinity of the release. The impact of this accidental release would depend upon the location
of the release relative to the public. The possibility of accidental release during delivery
depends upon the following factors which are reflected in the accident statistics:
1 See Hazardous Materials Management section of the Final Staff Assessment for the Contra Costa Power Plant Unit 8 (00-
AFC-1), March 2, 2001.
1
TRANSPORTATION OF AMMONIA RISK ANALYSIS
results in the evacuation of six or more persons, or results in the release of hazardous
materials. This year (through August 28th), there have been only 3 reported aqueous
ammonia releases nationwide where the cargo contained 35 percent ammonia, or less.
(http://hazmat.dot.gov/pubs/inc/incdata.htm).
Transportation Probability Analysis
Technical and scientific literature on hazardous materials transportation was reviewed for
accident rates in the United States and California in performing this transportation
probability analysis for the delivery of aqueous ammonia to CECP. The following
references were used to prepare this hazardous materials transportation probability
analysis:
Davies, P.A. and Lees, F.P. 1992. “The Assessment of Major Hazards: The Road Transport
Environment for Conveyance of Hazardous Materials in Great Britain.” Journal of
Hazardous Materials, 32: 41-79.
Harwood, D.W., Viner, J.G., and E.R. Russell. 1993. “Procedure for Developing Truck
Accident and Release Rates for Hazmat Routing.” Journal of Transportation Engineering.
119(2): 189-199.
Vilchez, J.A., Sevilla, S., Montiel, H., and J. Casal. 1995. “Historical Analysis of Accidents in
Chemical plants and in the Transportation of Hazardous Materials.” J. Loss Prev. Process
Ind. 8(2): 87-96.
National Response Center (www.nrc.uscg.mil)
Chemical Incident Reports Center, U.S. Chemical Safety Board (www.chemsafety.gov)
National Transportation Safety Board (www.ntsb.gov)
Data presented in the 1992 Davies and Lees study (which uses data from the 1990 Harwood
study) identifies the frequency of hazardous materials release during transportation as
between 0.06 and 0.19 releases per million miles traveled on well-designed roads and
highways. The study presented data for the three dominant road types: urban freeway,
rural freeway, and two-lane rural road. The reported frequencies of hazardous materials
release during transportation per million miles traveled were 0.06 (urban freeway), 0.14
(rural freeway), and 0.19 (two-lane rural road). The Davies and Lee study also estimated the
probability of an incident randomly occurring in an area where a large number of people
would be exposed. This analysis estimated that 8.9 percent of such incidents would cause
more than 10 fatalities and 1.4 percent would cause more than 33 deaths. These statistics do
not include any mitigating effects from meteorological conditions (such as wind) that would
help disperse the ammonia, thus reducing the potential impacts.
The Applicant estimates the annual number of ammonia deliveries to be a maximum of 60
per year (5 deliveries per month X 12 months). Each ammonia delivery truck will travel
approximately 1.56 miles from the Interstate 5 off-ramp to the plant site. Therefore, the
estimated annual distance the loaded ammonia delivery trucks will travel on this section of
roadway is 93.6 miles (1.56 miles x 60 deliveries).
2
TRANSPORTATION OF AMMONIA RISK ANALYSIS
To be conservative in this analysis, the Applicant selected the two-lane rural road value,
which has a higher risk rate than an urban truck route. Using the data presented in Davies
and Lees for the reported frequency of a hazardous material transportation-related release
of 0.19 releases per million miles of rural road traveled and the estimate that 8.9 percent of
the incidents would cause more than 10 fatalities, the risk of an accident causing more than
10 fatalities is 0.017 per one million tanker miles traveled (0.19 releases per million miles x
0.089 accident rate). Since the distance traveled is 93.6 miles per year, the risk of an incident
occurring during the year that would result in 10 or more fatalities is 0.017/million miles x
93.6 miles, or 1.59 in one million.
The risk of an accident occurring that would result in more than 33 deaths is even smaller.
Using the Davies and Lee data, the probability is 0.19 releases per million miles of rural road
traveled and the estimate that 1.4 percent of the incidents would cause more than
33 fatalities; the risk of an accident causing more than 33 fatalities is 0.0027 per one million
tanker miles traveled (0.19 releases per million miles x 0.014 accident rate). Since the
distance traveled is 93.6 miles per year, the risk of an accident occurring in any year that
would result in 33 or more fatalities is 0.0027/million miles x 93.6 miles, or 0.25 in one
million.
The CEC uses a significance threshold of 1 in 100,000 (or 10 in 1,000,000) for a risk of 10
fatalities and a threshold of 1 in 1,000,000 for a risk of 100 fatalities2. Both of the project’s risk
estimates (1.59 and 0.25 in one million) are at least 6 times below these thresholds.
Therefore, the risk of exposure to aqueous ammonia during transport to the plant site is not
significant.
2 See Hazardous Materials Management section of the Final Staff Assessment for the Contra Costa Power Plant Unit 8 (00-
AFC-1), March 2, 2001.