Acute Pancreatitis: Review Article
Acute Pancreatitis: Review Article
Acute Pancreatitis: Review Article
Acute pancreatitis
Bo-Guang Fan, MD., PhD., Åke Andrén-Sandberg, MD., PhD.*
Citation: Fan BG, Andrén-Sandberg Å. Acute pancreatitis. North Am J Med Sci 2010; 2: 211-214.
Availability: www.najms.org
ISSN: 1947 – 2714
Abstract
Background: Acute pancreatitis continues to be a serious illness, and the patients with acute pancreatitis are at risk to
develop different complications from ongoing pancreatic inflammation. Aims: The present review is to highlight the
classification, treatment and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. Material & Methods: We reviewed the English-language
literature (Medline) addressing pancreatitis. Results: Acute pancreatitis is frequently caused by gallstone disease or excess
alcohol ingestion. There are a number of important issues regarding clinical highlights in the classification, treatment and
prognosis of acute pancreatitis, and treatment options for complications of acute pancreatitis including pancreatic
pseudocysts. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary approach should be used for the management of the patient with acute
pancreatitis.
pancreatitis) [5]. The entity of moderately severe acute endocytic structures, together with lysosomes, zymogen
pancreatitis is characterized by local complications granules and elements of the endoplasmic reticulum, also
without organ failure. Mortality in moderately severe acute play an important role in the physiological Ca2+ signal
pancreatitis is similar to that in mild pancreatitis but generation that normally regulates enzyme and fluid
hospitalization prolonged like in severe pancreatitis. Local secretion from the exocrine pancreas [12] .
complications are defined as pancreatic necrosis or fluid
collections [6]. The pathogenic mechanisms underlying acute pancreatitis
are involved in two key pathologic acinar cell responses of
this disease: vacuole accumulation and trypsinogen
Histopathology of acute activation [14]. An increase in intracellular calcium is the
pancreatitis basis for activation of trypsinogen, via a co-localization of
Patients with pancreatic infection may have infected enzyms (cathepsin B), inducing the inflammation. There
necrosis, pancreatic abscess, and/or infected pseudocysts are three ways to die: necrosis, apoptosis and autophagy.
[7]. The microbes most frequently involved are Without autophagy there is very little active trypsin, but
gram-negative organisms including Escherichia coli, with autophagy there is shown a lot of cytosolic cathepsin
Enterococcus, and Klebsiella [8]. On the other hand, for B, as part of the caspace activation. Caerulein stimulation
the earliest histopathological changes of acute pancreatitis, causes caspace 3 activation, just as exogenous cathepsin B
Kovalska and co-worker [9] investigated intraoperative causes caspace 3 activation in permeable rat acinar cells
pancreatic tissue samples, and attempted to find possibility [15]. However, heat shock proteins protects against
to reparation of pancreatic tissue in nearest after severe caerulin-induced pancreatitis, and has effects on pancreatic
acute pancreatitis. Their study demonstrated that the most cancer. Heat shock proteins are chaperone proteins that
severe damages take place in exocrine part of the pancreas. protect living cells against injury-inducing stimuli [16].
Nerves and stroma appeared to be resistant to pancreatitis
associated damage. Stromal construction put on some Possible strategies for early
limitation to extension of the inflammation. Pancreatic
intralobular ducts have shown resistance to inflammation, treatment of acute pancreatitis
which has been proportional to their diameter. Langerhans A genetic study suggested that polymorphisms in toll-like
islands also have relative stability to inflammation [9]. receptor-4 might affect the risk of developing infections in
acute pancreatitis [17]. Studies of chronic pancreatitis have
Distinguish between infected and sterile pancreatic shown that specific neural receptors, transient receptor
necrosis is always challenging for clinical practice, potential vanilloid subtype 1, mediate pain responses in a
therefore, needle aspiration may be required [8, 10]. model of chronic pancreatitis [18].
episode of gallstone pancreatitis and after two bouts of for continuous lavage. The most common complication is
idiopathic acute pancreatitis. However, cholecystectomy occlusion of the drains with debris. Therefore, lavage to
fails to prevent recurrence in acute pancreatitis without get rid of debris and infected materials is a option, and
gallbladder stones and sludge. These results do not support thorough supplementary treatment with tailored antibiotics
the recommendation for cholecystectomy in idiopathic and jejunal feeding is mandatory [25].
pancreatitis [20].
Pancreatitis-induced inflammatory exudates can get to a
spleen immediately. Clinical and radiological changes in
Management of pancreatic the spleen were estimated mostly by computer tomography
necrosis or ultrasonography. Spleen damages can be categorised as
Sterile pancreatic necrosis is typically managed infarct, subcapsular fluid collections, subcapsular
conservatively without drainage. It may be challenging to hematoma and abscess. The spleen changes in acute
distinguish between sterile and infected pancreatic pancreatitis are transgent, and thus primary conservative
necrosis, and therefore, some study suggested CT-guided treatment can be the strategy in most patients [26].
fine-needle aspiration as a diagnose of the infected
pancreatic necrosis. However, fine-needle aspiration is Conclusion
associated with significant risks, and patients with Acute pancreatitis is a common disease frequently caused
extensive pancreatic necrosis and low C-reactive protein by choledocholithiasis or excess alcohol ingestion. A three
should be observed. CT-guided fine-needle aspiration is category classification of severity of acute pancreatitis
indicated only when there is clinical suspicion of infection were recently designed. The management of acute
and CRP >55 mg/L [21]. pancreatitis is frequently challenging, and
multidisciplinary approach should be used for the
Timing for debridement of severe acute pancreatitis may management of the patient with acute pancreatitis.
take place in proper demarcation of viable tissues enabling
an easier and safer debridement. Severe organ failure
within the first week after attack, however, is closely
linked to infection making postponing of intervention
References
dangerous. 1. Jovicic I, Petronijević L, Denić L, Golubović G,
Kontić M. Epidemiology of acute pancreatitis in
Surgical intervention consisted of open or laparoscopic Belgrade. Pancreatology 2009; 9: 510.
surgery. Early surgery was accompanied with relatively 2. Munsell MA, Buscaglia JM, Acute Pancreatitis. J
small number of specific local complications, including Hosp Med 2010;5: 241-250.
bleeding, intestinal fistulas and pancreatic fistulas [22]. 3. Pannala R, Kidd M, Modlin IM. Acute
One study compared the results of traditional pancreatitis: a historical perspective. Pancreas
necrosectomy with minimally invasive procedures. Among 2009 ; 38 : 355-366 .
2571 patients, 81 percent were treated conservatively and 4. Petrov MS, Windsor JA. Classification of the
19 percent underwent surgery. 183 (38 %) patients Severity of Acute Pancreatitis: How Many
underwent traditional necrosectomy. In this series of 162 Categories Make Sense? Am J Gastroenterol
(33 %) patients with organized fluid collections, had 2010; 105:74–76.
resolution of sepsis without ”open” surgery. Large-bore 5. Hammel P, Soufir N, Levy P, Rebours V, Maire F,
catheters were placed by percutaneous puncture associated Hentic O, Ruszniewksi P. Detection of CDKN2A,
with laparoscopy, or through the extraperitoneal CDK and BRCA2 genes in patients with familial
translumbar approach. Hospital and postoperative pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 2009; 9: 463.
mortality rate was 6 percent and 33 percent in the group of 6. Talukdar R, Vege SS, Chari S, Clemens M,
patients who underwent traditional open surgery and 5 Pearson R. Moderately severe acute pancreatitis:
percent and 24 percent respectively in the drainage group a prospective validation study of this new
[23]. subgroup of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology
2009; 9: 434.
There are two peaks of lethality in acute pancreatitis: the 7. Beger HG, Rau BM. Severe acute pancreatitis:
first during the first 7-8 days from the disease onset, clinical course and management. World J
connected with early dysfunction of organs; the second Gastroenterol 2007;13:5043–5051.
peak onsets from the second week of the disease and is 8. Beger HG, Bittner R, Block S, Buchler M.
connected with infected centre’s of necrosis and liquid Bacterial contamination of pancreatic necrosis. A
clumps [24]. prospective clinical study. Gastroenterology.
1986;91:433–438.
Walled-off necrosis in necrotising pancreatitis is 9. Kovalska I, Lubenets T. Pathomorphological
established by a thickened wall without epithelial living changes and perspectives of severe acute
between the necrosis and the adjacent surviving tissue. For pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2009; 9: 503-504.
decompression of this fluid collection, it is recommended 10. Banks PA, Gerzof SG, Langevin RE, Silverman
to implant at least two 10F drains with nasocysticus drain SG, Sica GT, Hughes MD.CT-guided aspiration
213
www.najms.org North American Journal of Medical Sciences 2010 May, Volume 2. No. 5.