0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views1 page

Facts

The document discusses a criminal case filed against school officials for violating a law. It discusses the facts of the case, issues raised about the constitutionality of the law, and the court's ruling reversing the lower court's decision. The court found the penalty was not disproportionate and the discretion granted to courts to determine penalties was a matter of statutory interpretation, not an undue delegation of power.

Uploaded by

LawardCaps
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views1 page

Facts

The document discusses a criminal case filed against school officials for violating a law. It discusses the facts of the case, issues raised about the constitutionality of the law, and the court's ruling reversing the lower court's decision. The court found the penalty was not disproportionate and the discretion granted to courts to determine penalties was a matter of statutory interpretation, not an undue delegation of power.

Uploaded by

LawardCaps
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 1

Facts:

 In a complaint filed by the Chief of Police of Hindang, Leyte on April 4, 1975, herein private
respondents Celestino S. Matondo, Segundino A.
 Caval and Cirilo M. Zanoria, public school officials of Leyte, were charged before the Municipal
Court of Hindang, Leyte in Criminal Case No. 555... thereof for violation of Republic Act No.
4670.  The case was set for arraignment and trial on May 29, 1975.  At the arraignment, the
herein private respondents, as the accused therein, pleaded not guilty to the charge.
 the facts charged do not constitute an offense considering that Section 32 of Republic Act No.
4670 is null and void for being unconstitutional.
 On March 15, 1976, the petitioner herein filed an opposition to the admission of the said
amended petition respondent judge denied the same in his resolution of April 20, 1976.[10] On
August 2, 1976, herein petitioner filed a supplementary memorandum in answer to the
amended petition.
Issues:
It imposes a cruel and unusual punishment; the term of imprisonment being unfixed and may run to
reclusion perpetua; and
(2) It also constitutes an undue delegation of legislative power, the duration of the penalty of
imprisonment being solely left to the discretion of the court as if the latter were the legislative
department of the Government.
Ruling:
That the penalty is grossly disproportionate to the crime is an insufficient basis to declare the law
unconstitutional on the ground that it is cruel and unusual.
The fact that the punishment authorized by the statute is severe does not make it cruel or unusual.
An apparent exception to the general rule forbidding the delegation of legislative authority to the courts
exists in cases where discretion is conferred upon said courts.  It is clear, however, that when the courts
are said to exercise a... discretion, it must be a mere legal discretion which is exercised in discerning the
course prescribed by law and which, when discerned, it is the duty of the court to follow.
criminal jurisdiction of the court is determined by the statute in force at the time of the commencement
of the action.
the decision and resolution of respondent judge are hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE.  Criminal Case No.
555 filed against private respondents herein is hereby ordered to be remanded to the Municipal Trial
Court of Hindang, Leyte
Principles:
The basic principle underlying the entire field of legal concepts pertaining to the validity of legislation is
that in the enactment of legislation a constitutional measure is thereby created.
whether the constitutional prohibition looks only to the form or nature of the penalty and not to the
proportion between the penalty and the crime.
the discretion granted therein by the legislature to the courts to determine the period of imprisonment
is a matter of statutory construction and not an undue delegation of legislative power.

You might also like