LOT PAVING REPORT - QA Testing using Maximum Specific Gravities

CONTRACT NO. PROJECT FROM LOT NO. MST DESIGN NO. DESIGN DESIGN BSG of
PROJECT NO. DENSITY 2364 3.5 2.689
AIR VOIDS (%) AGGREGATE
12345 2 (kg/m3)

WEEK ENDING PROJECT TO MIX TYPE PIT NAME DESIGN DESIGN Gmm at
CL NO. A CS ASPHALT 5.6 14.5 2450
YY MM DD S1 CONTENT (%) VMA (%) Design AC
PAVING CONTRACTOR QA CONSULTANT TARGET DESIGN
yy mm dd HW XX xx ASPHALT 5.6 LIFT 20
MAT 6-78/19 CONTENT (%) THICKNESS (mm)

LOT AGGREGATE PROPORTIONS FORMED MARSHALL SPECIMENS ASPHALT CONTENT LOT PAVEMENT AND COMPACTION DATA

METHOD
AGGREGATE 12.5mm

THICKNESS
** COMPACTION
MANUFACTURED

SEGMENT

MOISTURE

MOISTURE
CONTENT
BLEND SAND %

DATE LAID Max Spec *

CORE
CORE
CORRECTED (calculation of

SEGMENT #
CORE

MIX

SOURCE

LOCATION
DENSITY Gravity * AIR VOIDS STATION AIR VOIDS
COARSE

FINES %

ASPHALT DENSITY Core

+ OR -

LANE
(Gmm)

LIFT
V.M.A. Compaction
%

CONTENT by Gmm not required)

SAMPLE
(% by using AV (% by using AV % by Gmm by Marshall

TEST
(dd-mm-yyyy) (kg/m3) (kg/m3) Gmm) Table (%) (%) (%) (00+000) (mm) (kg/m3) Gmm) Table Density (%)

1-Jan-2013 80 15 5 2371 2449 3.2 3.3 16.4 0.02 BP 5.34 IG 1 0+001 + 1.3 N B 20 2162 11.4 11.9 88.6 91.4 0.81
LOT PAVING LIMITS (km) 2358 2437 3.2 3.9 16.8 0.02 BP 5.37 IG 2 0+001 + 2.3 N B 20 2253 7.6 8.2 92.4 95.2 0.91
FROM TO LANE MAT 2373 2436 2.6 3.3 16.3 0.02 BP 5.48 IG 3 0+001 + 2.0 N B 20 2214 9.2 9.8 90.8 93.6 0.77
7+183 13+239 E R 2371 2439 2.8 3.4 16.4 0.02 BP 5.55 IG 4 0+001 + 1.7 S B 20 2201 9.8 10.3 90.2 93.0 0.26
2360 2434 3.0 3.8 16.8 0.02 BP 5.53 IG 5 0+001 + 2.9 S B 20 2239 8.2 8.7 91.8 94.6 0.37

2367 2439 3.0 3.5 16.5 0.02 5.45 LOT MEAN 20 2214 9.2 9.8 90.8 93.5 0.62
ADDITIVE MAT * Use Lot Mean Corrected asphalt content to calculate Marshall Air Voids & V.M.A. ** % COMPACTION = (100 x Segment Core Density) / (Lot Mean Marshall Density)
RA Reclaim R Right Marshall AV by Gmm = ((Gmm-Marshall Density)/ Gmm)) x 100 Core AV by Gmm = (Gmm-Core Density) / Gmm
CF Coarse Fines L Left
BS C GRADATION LOT TONNAGE 1725.40
Blend Sand Centerline
ASPHALT CONTENT CORRECTION FACTOR (%) -0.86
SOURCE
SAMPLE

C 2nd Coarse RS Right Shoulder SIEVE ANALYSIS - % PASSING (µm)

TEST
OR LS Left
NO.
MQA (QA or QC ACCEPTANCE LOT) QC
Other_________ Shoulder
TEST METHOD LANE COMMENTS
25,000 20,000 16,000 12,500 10,000 5,000 1,250 630 315 160 80
FE Filterless Extraction N Northbound
NU Nuclear S Southbound STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION: EDITION 15, 2013
RE Reflux W Westbound 1 BP 100 100 100 98 89 63 32 23 13 8.4 5.2
FC Filter Centrifuge E Eastbound
IG Ignition 2 BP 100 100 100 99 91 61 32 24 15 9.5 6.2 LOW Marshall Air voids (3.5% ± 0.5%) example Comments
OR Other________ 3 BP 100 100 100 98 89 58 30 23 14 9.2 6.0 HIGH Marshall Air voids (3.5% ± 0.5%)
4 BP 100 100 100 97 84 53 26 20 13 8.3 5.3 QA AC on loose mix from B.P. = 5.48 % Core Density < 97%
SAMPLE SOURCE CODE LIFT 5 BP 100 100 100 98 89 62 32 24 15 9.2 6.0 Grad out of Tolerance (1250-630µm sieves) Rain delay on Jan 1 @ 2:00pm
CO Core B Bottom Lift
TECHNOLOGISTS :
BP Behind T QA1 BP 100 100 100 98 86 57 29 21 12 8.3 5.2
Paver Top Lift
QA2 BP 100 100 100 98 88 59 31 23 14 8.7 5.6 CONSULTANT :
CF Cold Feed O Other Lifts
1-5 100 100 100 98 88 59 30 23 14 8.9 5.7 PROJECT MANAGER :
OR Other LOT MEAN
QA 100 100 100 98 87 58 30 22 13 8.5 5.4 RECEIVED BY :
JOB MIX FORMULA 100 100 100 98 88 60 31 23 14 9.5 6.4 *** Contractor's Representative

TOLERANCES FOR THE LOT MEAN FROM JOB MIX FORMULA ±5 ±5 ±5 ±5 ±5 ±3 ±2 ±2 ± 1.5 ± 1.5 DATE RECEIVED : TIME :
MAXIMUM RANGE BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS IN A LOT 10 10 10 10 10 6 5 4 3 3 *** Signature indicates receipt of data on the date and time indicated

Revised December 2019 Appendix B.09a