See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/46445647

Production Possibilities in Catchment Areas Under Dharabi Dam in Chakwal

Article · January 2008

Source: RePEc

CITATION READS
1 237

1 author:

Muhammad Aamir khan

COMSATS University Islamabad
30 PUBLICATIONS   87 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

World Bank funded Project : Regional Trade and Economic Development: Options for Pakistan View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Muhammad Aamir khan on 17 July 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

PRODUCTION POSSIBILITIES IN CATCHMENT AREAS UNDER
DHARABI DAM IN CHAKWAL

MUHAMAD AAMIR KHAN

(02- arid-85)

Department of Economics & Agri. Economics

Faculty of Sciences
Pir Mehr Ali Shah
Arid Agriculture University
Rawalpindi, Pakistan

2008
PRODUCTION POSSIBILITIES IN CATCHMENT AREAS UNDER
DHARABI DAM IN CHAKWAL

by

Muhammad Aamir Khan

(02-arid- 85)

A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment

of the requirements for the degree of

Master of Science (Hons.) Agriculture

in

Agriculture Economics

Department of Economics & Agri. Economics

Faculty of Sciences
Pir Mehr Ali Shah
Arid Agriculture University
Rawalpindi, Pakistan

2008

ii
 O’ ALLAH

Open Our Eyes…

To See…
What Is Beautiful…

Our Minds…
To Know…
What Is True;

Our Hearts…
To Love…
What Is Good.

(Aa’meen)

iii
 I

Dedicate This Humble Task,

Fruit of My Thoughts and Study

To My

Affectionate “Grand Parents, Parents, Brothers, Sisters

and to all my nephew and nieces”

Who Always Wished and helped

Me for my Studies

iv
 CONTENTS

Page

List of Tables viii

List of Annexure x

Acknowledgements xi

1. INTRODUCTION 1

2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 10

3. MATERIALS AND METHODS 15

3.1 Survey Schedule 15

3.2 Calculation of Gross Margins 15

3.3 Statistical Techniques Used 17

3.4 Limitation of Study 18

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 20

4.1 FARM HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS 20

4.1.1 Village Profile 20

4.1.2 Nature and location of off farm work 21

4.1.3 Family labor 21

4.1.4 Access to institutional support service (Agricultural Extension

Service) 23

4.2 FARM HOUSEHOLD ASSETS 23

4.2.1 Farm assets 24

v
 4.2.2 Farm machinery 24

4.2.3 Livestock 24

4.3 OTHER ASPECTS OF DAM CONSTRUCTION 25

4.3.1 Community contribution in planning 25

4.3.2 Realization of actual plan 26

4.3.4 The maintenance of Water Supply channels and water courses 26

4.4 FARM CHARACTERISTICS 27

4.4.1 Salient features of Farms 27

4.4.2 Land utilization pattern 28

4.4.3 Land use Intensity 28

4.4.4 Soil types 28

4.4.6 Cropping systems 30

4.4.7 Cropping intensity 31

4.4.8 Tenurial status 33

4.5 FARM INPUT USE 33

4.5.1 Cultural Practices 33

4.5.2 Farm Input 34

4.6 FARM OUTPUT 42

4.6.1 Crop yield 44

4.6.2 Average Prices Received for crops 44

4.6.3 Main Marketing Problems 46

4.6.4 Milk Production, Consumption and Sale 46

4.7 FARM AND HOUSEHOLD INCOME 47

4.7.1 Gross Marginal Analysis 47

vi
 4.7.2 Nature of Farm Assets 51

4.7.3 Whole farm Budget 55

4.7.4 Benefit Cost Ratio 56

4.7.5 Marginal Analysis 58

4.7.6 Total Household Income 59

4.7.7 Average off-farm house hold income 59

SUMMARY 61

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 65

LITERATURE CITED 68

vii
 List of Tables

Table No. Page

1. Water resource developed by the construction of Small Dams in Potohar 5

2. Number of small dams in different districts 7

3. Salient features of small dams 7

4. Categories of farmers 16

5. Nature of off farm workers 21

6. Land utilization pattern of sample farms by farm size 27

7. Percent distribution of land 28

8. Land use intensity 29

9. Percent area allocation to different crops 31

10. Cropping intensity of irrigated and rain fed crops 32

11. Average number of ploughings and plankings of crop per hectare on sample 34
farms

12. Average quantity of farm yard manure (40 kgs/ha) applied on sample farms 35

13. Average quantity of chemical fertilizer (kgs/ha) applied on sample farms 36

14. Average seed rate (kg) of crops on sample farms 37

15. Average number of irrigations applied to various crops 38

16. Recommended average numbers of irrigations 39

17. Water rates for different crops 39

18. Feeding cost of livestock on sample farms 40

19. Average yield of major crops on sample farms 41

viii
20. Average prices (Rs. /40kgs) of various crops 42

21. Production, consumption and sale of milk (kgs) on sample farms 43

22. Gross margin of crops at farm level 45

23. Value of output per unit farm of buffaloes and cows 46

24. Average annual farm cost per sample farm 48

25. Cost per Unit animal of irrigated and rain fed farms 49

26. Whole farm budget 50

27. Benefit cost ratio of crops (per farm unit) 51

28. Benefit cost ratio of livestock ( per farm unit) 51

29. Marginal rate of return 52

30. Total household income 53

ix
 List of Annexure
No. Page
1. Cost of input use 73
2. Yields of Crops 76
3. Prices of Enterprises (Crops and livestock’s) to
calculate Outputs. 77
4. Questionnaire 79

x
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

If oceans turn into ink and all of the wood becomes pens, even then the praises of

“Allah Almighty” cannot be expressed. He, who created the universe and knows whatever, is

there in it, hidden or evident and who bestowed upon me the intellectual ability and wisdom

to search for the secrets. I must bow my head before Allah Almighty who is compassionate

and merciful and whose begin help enabled me to complete this job, which marks an

important turning point in my life.

Countless salutations be upon the “Holy Prophet Muhammad (Sallallah-o-Alaih-

Wassalam), the city of knowledge who has guided his “Umma” to seek knowledge from

cradle to grave.

The words are inadequate to express my deepest sense of appreciation and devotion to

my worthy research Supervisor Mr. Arshad Mahmood Malik Assistant Professor,

Department of Food Technology, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi. I am

extremely grateful to his scholastic and sympathetic attitude, inspiring guidance, generous

assistance, constructive criticism, timely advice and enlightened supervision in the

accomplishment of this manuscript.

I wish to extend my thanks to Prof. Dr. Sarfraz Ahmad Mian Chairman, Department

of Economics And Agri.Economics, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi and Dr

xi
Akhtar Ali, Project Coordinator Watershed Project for their obligation, well wishes and

encouragement during the course of my research studies and presentation of this manuscript.

I am very much obliged to members of my supervisory committee Dr Abdul

Qayyum, Assistant Professor, Department of Economics And Agri.Economics, Mr.

Muhammad Hanif, Assistant Professor, Statistic Department, PMAS-Arid Agriculture

University Rawalpindi and Dr. Muhammad Azeem Khan Senior Director SSD, PARC for

their timely help and suggestions during completion of my research.

I am also thankful to Dr.Abdul Saboor, Sir Bashir Ahmad, Madam Aafia

Mushtaq,Madam Saima Asad and Madam Gulnaz Faculty members of Economics and

Agri.Economics Department, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi for their

constructive, criticism, unfailing help and valuable suggestions throughout my research

studies.

I owe a debt of gratitude to Dr. Abdul Majeed, Country Representative ICARDA

Pakistan for their skilful guidance, encouragement, suggestions and friendly behavior during

my research work. Thanks and profound appreciations are also extended to Mr. Khalid and

Mr. Zafar, ICARDA employees for their Co-operation and help.

Thanks are due to my colleagues Bilal Mansoor, S Rauf, Adeel Ahmad, Raja

Rehan, Yasir Khurshid, Yasir Habib, Haider Abbas, Muneeb Ahmad, Muhammad

Abid, Farhan Hassan, Naveed Ahmad, Obaid ur Rehman, Abdullah and for their

support in writing and completing my thesis.

xii
 Last but not least I pay my cordial thanks to my Parents, brothers, sisters and well

wishers for their prayers, moral encouragement and financial support through out my

academic career. No words can really express the feeling that I have for my beloved parents.

May Allah give them long happy life (Ameen)!

(Muhammad Aamir Khan)

xiii
 Chapter 1

INTRODUCTION

Notwithstanding its declining share in GDP, agriculture is still the single

largest sector, contributing 21 percent to GDP and employing 44 percent of the

workforce. Pakistan’s agriculture is classified as an irrigated one. Out of about 23.5

million hectares of its total culturable land, 19.62 million hectares come from irrigated

area, giving about 90% of its total agriculture production. Culturable waste is about

8.32 million hectares. Like in other developing countries, poverty in Pakistan is largely

a rural phenomenon; therefore, development of agriculture will be a principal vehicle

for alleviating rural poverty (GOP, 2008).

There could be two possible approaches to increase the agricultural production

viz. either by bringing more area under cultivation or increasing the yield per acre. The

first option is almost flexible, however, the yield per acre could be increased. To

increase the crop yield, water input is the most limiting factor particularly in the barani

areas (Bhutta, 99).

The Punjab province contains about 70%, or 14.8 million hectares of Pakistan’s

total cultivated area. Of these 12.6 million hectares are irrigated of which 8.3 million

hectares is irrigated through the Indus Basin irrigation system. Decentralized irrigation

1
system in the so-called barani (rainfed) tract of the Punjab province irrigate part of the

remainder (International Irrigation Management Institute, 1999).

The 2.2 Million hectare Potohar Plateau has a great potential for agricultural

and social development. Total cultivated area of Potohar Plateau is around 1.0 Million

hectare. Out of this area the Potohar Plateau with the area of 0.24 million hectare

(Mha) falls in the civil districts of Chakwal, Jhelum, Rawalpindi, Attock and federal

territory of Islamabad (Bhutta,1999).

A common feature of the rain fed areas is that agriculture is not developed due

to low yield, inconsistent and tardy rainfall over a year, losses of rainwater due to swift

run off, small size holdings and primitive technology. At the same time, topography of

Barani areas having sheer ground slopes, helps the rain water to flow with high

velocity to the slant of numerous brooks, thus resulting in erosion of the fertile soils.

In the past, the rain fed areas were considered great peril for agriculture, thus

almost all the resources were directed to the progress of the irrigated areas. However,

our Barani areas are too big to be ignored as they sustain over 80 % of the country’s

livestock population, contribute 12% of Wheat, 53% Barley, 69% of sorghum, 31% of

millets, 23% of rape seed/mustard, 65% of gram and 89% of ground nut and 17% of

other pulses to the overall national production (Khan,1988).

2
 The three month monsoon and erratic winter rain fall made the crop very

uncertain in the Potohar Pleatue.On the other hand the topography of the hilly area

with steep ground slopes, helps the rain water to form numerous streams. Due to high

velocities, this water erodes the good land. Apart from damaging the land and the

erosion of soil the rain water thus does not get a chance to soak down and develop any

ground water reservoir. Agriculture in these areas, therefore, depends entirely upon

rainfall, which at times is very meager. This cycle of drought is frequently experienced

and now witnessed in recent years. Consequently, to conserve the rain run-off for

agriculture, the only solution is to build dams, which would also eliminate the hazards

caused by delayed rains at the time of sowing and growing when a little delay in

rainfall may result into reduction of crop yield to less than half (Small Dam

Organization, 2007).

In Potohar, there is capability for both water resource improvement (surface

and subsurface) and its management (to improve the efficiency of the offered

systems).Water resource development mainly refers to such projects as construction of

large or small reservoirs, such as small dams, mini dams and ponds. The collection,

storage, maintenance, consumption and management of these sources are of principal

importance in these areas. Each millimeter of water collected, stored, conserved and

saved in these areas can produce wheat by an average of about 10 kg/ha (Marshal and

Holmes, 1988).

3
 To raise the socio-economic formation of the farming society the construction

of small and medium size dams was started in 1961 and by 1986 nineteen such dams

had been completed encompassing a command area in excess of 17000 acres. Its

unfortunate that for most of these soils no proper and detailed research for viability

had been conducted which resulted in low percentage of command area development.

Later on, under the Umbrella Project 12 dams were competed between 1987 and 1995

covering a command area of 17500 acres and rehabilitation of 9 old dams with

command area of 12850 acres.

In case of small dams, the performance of irrigation systems normally remains

low, despite major technical development efforts. According to NESPAK, 1991

description only 23% water of these dams was being used for crop production.

The Dharabi dam project is one of such efforts to develop water path by making the

dam in Dhrab River, a tributary of Soan River out fall in Indus River at a distance of

about 5 kilometers from village Balkasar of tehsil and district Chakwal. Total

catchment area of dam site is 147.31Sq.Km (56.88 Square miles). Mean Annual

rainfall in the Catchment area is 701.52 mm (28 inch).The proposed project will bring

about 6400 Acres of land water under irrigation out of which 6000 Acres through

gravity flow and 400 Acres through lift (Small Dam Organization, 2007).

After heavy investment on these small dams, less than one third of the

proposed area was irrigated by small dams. Therefore, the desired changes in cropping

4
pattern could not be achieved (Iqbal and Shahid, 1992). Owing to high surface area to

volume ratio, these small reservoirs are subject to high evaporation losses. On an

average, small reservoirs lose 50% of their impoundments to evaporation in arid and

semi-arid areas .The leaching and percolation losses in small reservoirs are about 20%

of reservoir volume against 5% in large dams (Keller et al., 2000).

On the other hand these reservoirs positively found that due to the availability

of water in these dams contributed to the crop productivity and the crop yield has been

increased 36% in case of wheat and 51% in case of maize (Shah, 1984)

Table 1. shows the water resource developed by the construction of small

dams. These small dams having a live storage of 214327 Acres and can irrigate more

than 62764 acres.

Table 1 Water Resource Developed By the Construction of Small Dams In

Potohar
District Number of Dams C.C.A (Acre). Live storage (acres)
Rawalpindi 8 7958 14968
Chakwal 16 20699 76229
Attock 15 18629 45401
Jhelum 9 14328 32952
Islamabad 2 1150 44777
Total 50 62764 214327
Source: Small Dam Organization, Islamabad. 2007

5
 The research study of the gross margins has been carried out at Dharabi dam.

Dharabi dam is located in Tehsil Kalar Kahar District Chakwal.

About 5 to 10 % area of the surrounding villages is irrigated with the small

dam water. Most of the farming community (95%) of the surrounding villages has

small land holding, therefore, the small farmers would be direct beneficiaries in long

and short-term activities of research from this irrigated site.

The Dharabi dam was selected because it was approachable and also keeping in

view the significance for agriculture of the area. An applied agricultural component of

International centre for Agriculture in Dry Areas (ICARDA) was also initiated

research on water use efficiency in the catchment area of the dam. With the

collaboration of the ICARDA the study has been conducted. From this study the

existing water use for alternative crops and livestock combinations explored. This will

help the research component of ICARDA Project to plan specific interventions to

address the low water use efficiency issues at this target site. The information from this

study would be used in the project villages as well as to other villages where similar

circumstances are prevailing, as water requirements for crops are very significant.

STATUS OF DHARABI DAM

Small dams irrigation program
Punjab Small Dams Organization (SDO) was created in 1960 under the

irrigation and power department. Small Dams organization was integrated into the

6
West Agricultural Development Corporation (WAPDC) in early 1962. Later on, when

the WPADC was dissolved in 1972, SDO became part of the Punjab Department of

irrigation and Power. Until 1986, Small Dams Organization had completed 18 small

dams in Rawalpindi Division (Iqbal, 1989)

The Government of Punjab had constructed 50 small dams in the potohar

regions. Besides supplying water for irrigation, these dams have many indirect effects.

They help recharge the ground water, provide water for domestic and municipal

purposes, control erosion, control floods in hilly and plain tracts, help to develop fish

culture and also provide recreational activities (Iqbal, 1989)

There are fifty (50) small dams constructed in Potohar region. The detail of

these small dams is given in Table 2

Table 2 Number of small dams in different districts of Potohar region

Districts Number of small Dams

Islamabad 2
Rawal pindi 8
Chakwal 16
Attock 15
Jhelum 9
Grand Total 50
Source: Small Dam Organization, Islamabad. 2007

7
Salient features of Dharabi dam

Table 3 Silent features of Dharabi dam is given in table

C.C.A (acres) Catchment Live Storage Capacity of Length of

Area (sq.miles) (Aft) Irrigation Canal (ft)
Channel (Cfs.)

6400 56.88 37000 32 131800

Source: Small Dam Organization, Islamabad. 2007

Culturable Command Area (C.C.A):

The CCA is the area having potential to be utilized or brought under

cultivation. The CCA of Dharabi dam is 6400 acres.

Catchment Area:

The catchment area is the overall adjoining area of the dam where from water

flows towards the dam. The catchment area of Dharabi dam is 56.88 square miles..

Live Storage:

The live storage capacity is the minimum level of water that can be utilized for

irrigation and drinking purposes, in the dam. The live storage capacity of Dharabi Dam

is 37000 A Ft.

Thus this study will play a significant role in identifying the Production

possibilities of the communities of two villages i.e. Chak khushi and Kalar kahar

8
located in the Dharabi dam command area. It reflects somehow a true picture of

farmer’s economic condition in the form of gross margins at enterprise and at a farm

level. The coefficients estimated from the study will be used for analysis of different

models constructed for farm level under different resource system.

The general objective of the study is to assess the production possibilities in

rain fed and irrigated farmers with an emphasis on specific objective of the study will

be as follows:

1 To study the gross margins at farm enterprises.

2 To identify different production possibilities of water shed communities

of Dharabi dam.

3 To support farmer in decision making among different farm enterprises.

9
 Chapter 2

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Khan et al. (1988) evaluated 22 small dams in Punjab and found that average

cropping intensity was 110.9% and average land use intensity was 92.3%. He

suggested that formal and informal organizations of farmers could play a significant

role in the effective utilization of water, proper construction, rehabilitation, operation

and maintenance of watercourses.

Government of Pakistan (1991) reported in the Evaluation of Small dams in

Punjab and NWFP that crop intensities achieved were very low compared to the

targets given. These ranged from 22 to 29 % at dams in Punjab against an average

target of 81%.Water supplied from dams was costly than any other source but it

definitely had unmeasured social benefits.

NESPAK (1991) reported that the achieved crop intensities will be very low

compared to the set targets. These ranged from 22 to 29% at dams in Punjab against an

average target of 84%, where as, in NWFP it ranged from 33 to 39% against a target of

81%.

Iqbal and shahid (1992) concluded that less than one third of the proposed area

was being irrigated by small dams. Therefore, desired changes in cropping pattern

10
could not be accomplished. They suggested weekly rotational schedule/ wara bandi in

which equitable and reliable distribution of water could be made possible. Agriculture

extension service was required to motivate farmers to bring about desired changes in

cropping pattern and adopt recommended practices.

Bennie et al. (1994) reported that in arid and semi-arid areas, 60 to 85% of the

rainfall evaporates from the soil surface before making any contribution to production.

Azhar (1995) reported that in Pakistan, farmers were unaware of the irrigation

scheduling for their crops. 75% of the farmers apply less water than the crop water

requirements, two third of farmers apply first irrigation very late. Farmers were

unaware of the consequences of the delayed irrigation. The delays in irrigation

negatively affect the wheat yield. A delay in irrigation after 30 days could cause yield

reduction of 30Kg/ha per day.

Shahid et al. (1996) reported that the Small Dams Organization has been quite

successful in achieving construction related physical targets of the small dam projects.

However, follow up activities after dams’ construction have been weak. After dam

construction, efforts should be made to bring culturable command area under

irrigation, which ultimately could contribute towards better quality of life and living

standards of rural community. They considered a slight shift in cropping pattern

towards the high value crops including rabi fodder, rabi and kharif vegetables as a

11
positive contribution of small dams project at both newly built and rehabilitated small

dams.

Cheema and Bandaragoda (1997) conducted base line survey for farmers

organizations of Mirwal and Shahpur dams. The cropping and land use intensities were

123.4 and 63.5 under the ittigated area of Mirwal dam, respectively whereas these

were 117.7 and 90 % at Shahpur dam, respectively. Iqbal (1989) reported cropping

intensity of 121.3% in the irrigated area of Shahpur dam.

Directorate of Soil Conservation (1997) reported that the barani area always

suffered from shortage of water.Under the project 323 mini dams and 693 ponds were

constructed and about 9000 acres has been brought under irrigation. These mini dams

and ponds were being utilized for irrigation and fish farming. With the development of

water resources and through other soil and water activities the farmers were getting an

increased income of Rs. 51.00 Million, also the value of the land had been increased.

Bhutta (1999) suggested that to fully exploit the benefits of additional

investment made at small dams in the form of improved irrigation network, not only

the share of high value crops in the cropping pattern should be improved, but some

non-traditional crops may also be introduced.

12
 IIMI (1999) reported that the small dams system offered a precious opportunity

for the sincere promotion of reforms in the irrigation sector. They will be independent

of the large scale Indus Basin irrigation System and therefore, more easily manageable

by smaller units of water users organizations and support service personnel.

Tarar (1999) suggested that changing the water distribution practices from the

existing natural co-operation basis to weekly rotational schedule by giving share

according to the size of land holdings in which water could be made available to every

farmer in the command area according to his weekly turn

Asianics Agro-Dev. International (2000) reported that half of the world’s dams

were built exclusively or primarily for irrigation, and an estimated 30 to 40% of the

270 million hectares of irrigated lands worldwide rely on dams. Dams were estimated

to contribute to 12-16% of food production.

Botha et al. (2003) concluded that the use of mulch in the basins reduced

evaporation significantly, contributing to the increase in yield, by 30 to 50%,

compared to production under conventional tillage.

Ogbeide et al. (2003) reported that communities that host small dams have

risks imposed on them and pay unwarranted and unacceptable costs of the benefits

derivable from the small dams.

13
 Mugabe et al. (2003) reported that water resource development and

management are concomitant. Without proper management; the water resource

developed can be lost without playing a significant role in the crop production and

socio-economic development of the area. Proper management requires adequate

knowledge of water availability, water requirement and productive water use.

Beukes (2004) reported that irrigated agriculture draws water mainly from

dams and water transfer schemes between catchments on which the retention of suf-

ficient runoff has been ensured

Renfro (2005) reported that improved soil moisture will open new

opportunities for diversifying farming activities in rain-fed areas. Due to the watershed

programs cropping intensity will be increased significantly and it is observed that

cropping intensity is increased by 13-25%.

14
 Chapter 3

MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1 SURVEY SCHEDULE

3.1.1 Informal Survey

Informal survey was conducted through checklist to verify different concepts at

farms level, which were mainly: level of water use on dam, dam condition, and the

research system applied on that site.

3.1.2 Questionnaire Formation

Through informal survey, based on title and in the light of objectives of study

the questionnaire covering important aspects of output and input costs components was

prepared and was tested in field for accuracy. During pre-testing there was observed

some flaws and complications in questionnaire, those were removed in final

questionnaire given in Annex-4. Then formal survey was conducted.

3.1.3 Formal Survey

Formal survey was conducted in September 2007, through which information

about different aspects of Dharabi dam command area like resource farmer interview,

crops and livestock were collected.

15
 3.1.4 Selection of Respondents and Collection Of Data

The primary data pertaining to the gross margins of the command area of

Dharabi dam from two villages (Kalar kahar & Chak Khushi) were collected on the

basis of stratified random sampling. Data was collected by making two categories of

farmers. First, farmers using dam water (irrigated), second, farmers from control area

(rainfed).

The sample size for study was 60 as mentioned in Table 4. Farmers from both

categories were selected randomly. The data was collected through face to face

interview with each individual farmer. Questionnaire was in English language (Annex-

4) but questions were interpreted in local language for farmers and exact reply was

written instantaneously.

Table 4 Categories of farmers

Categories No. of farmers Sample farmer percentage

Irrigated 30 50%

Rain fed 30 50%

Total 60 100%

The data thus collected was sorted out, tabulated and enterprise budgets were

prepared and gross margins were calculated for the purpose of analysis.

16
3.2 CALCULATION OF GROSS MARGINS

Gross Margin at Enterprise level

Enterprise gross margin was calculated by enterprise gross income minus the

variable expenses attributable to that enterprise. In order to calculate gross margins,

budgets were prepared at enterprise level for different crops and livestock in both the

villages.

Revenues from out put and costs of different variable inputs used were

calculated. Gross Margins were calculated at average sample size level by taking a

difference in the activity per unit revenue and per unit variable cost.

Gross Margin at Farm Level

Gross Margin at average farm level was calculated by different area allocation

to different enterprises multiplied by Gross Margin / unit area.

Economic techniques used

The Economic techniques used were:

• Enterprise Budgeting

• Whole farm Budgeting

• Marginal Analysis

17
Estimation of activity variable costs, revenues, and gross margins

The total cost of the variable input used to produce one unit of each enterprise

consists of money costs and opportunity costs. The opportunity costs were estimated

for the operations performed by owned farm machines, family labour and farm inputs

(Farm yard manure and seed ). The money costs were paid for inputs like fertilizer,

herbicide, insecticide, fuel, improved seed, casual hired labour, picking and

transplanting. The total variable costs to produce an activity x j were measured as

k T
cj = ∑ ∑ Pijt aijt
i =1 t =1

Where pijt is the unit price of the ith variable input applied to activity xj in time period

t ; aijt is the amount if ith input used by activity xj in time period t ; the subscript t =

1,….T identify the time intervals with in the activity’s production period

The revenue earned by production activities is the type and quantity of outputs, and

their market price. The types of output per activity were categorized into main product

and by product. Given the prices received for each output; the total revenue earned

from each unit of activity x j was measured as

N T
rj = ∑ ∑ Pnjt Ynjt
n =1 t =1

Where pnjt is the unit price of the nth output of activity j in time period t ; Ynjt

is the yield of the nth output produced from one unit of activity j in time period t ; and

n = 1,…,N denotes the outputs.

18
 The contribution of each enterprise to farm profitability is that activity’s gross

margins; that is the difference between an activity’s per unit revenue and variable input

costs per unit, computed as

Gj = rj – cj

Where r j is an activity’s per unit revenue and c j is an activity’s per unit

variable input

3.1.4 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

The general limitation confronting almost every developing country in the field

of research today is the lack of understanding and appreciation of the practical utility

of the research endeavors on the part of the sampled respondents, along with a

common mistrust in the research agency for fear of tax levies etc.

For the sake of drilling into the minds of the farmers the clear purpose and

objectives of the study, they had to be explained not to conceal the facts. They had to

be assured that the researcher collecting the data belonged to the PMAS Arid

Agriculture University, Rawalpindi and were in no way involved in the tax estimation

and would keep all information supplied by them as highly confidential.

Lack of proper record also turned out to be a serious difficulty in collecting the

accurate data. The researcher then had to partially depend upon farmer’s memory.

Hence some degree of error can be present.

19
 Chapter 4

RESULTS AND DISCUSION

This chapter analyses the farm household characteristics, farm household

assets, farm characteristics, farm inputs, farm outputs, production possibilities and

household’s income.

4.1 FARM HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS

A farm household was defined to include all those individuals who operated at

farm holding and their dependants who lived for at least three months at the house in a

village (Iqbal, 1989). Farm household characteristics deal socioeconomic conditions

with family size, age distribution, educational status etc of the respondent farmers.

4.1.1 Village profile

To explore the existing system, an exploratory survey has been conducted in

the area of Dharabi watershed. A comprehensive questionnaire has been prepared

covering about all aspects of watershed communities like availability of basic

facilities, demography, land and land use pattern, agricultural production, agricultural

machinery, soil, water, rangelands utilization, marketing and labor etc. The

questionnaire was processed through a series of consultative process and interactive

sharing with experts and specialists in national agricultural research institutes like

20
PARC, BARI, SAWCRI and Project coordinator. After survey of the area data has

been collected through focused group discussion with communities from 10 districts.

4.1.2 Nature and Location of Off Farm Work

It is important to study the nature and location of off farm work because it

indicates the type and level of employment available within village (Iqbal, 1989). It

was observed during survey as given in Table 5 that about 12 and 24 percent of the

adult male members of respondent farmers were participating in off farm work in both

irrigated and rain fed areas. It might be due to inadequate work for them on their farm.

Off farm work includes casual non-farm work, government service and private

Service.

It was clear majority of the workers were working outside the village which

indicates less availability of employment opportunities in the village. People in this

area had a trend of government services. Also some people were engaged in different

kinds of jobs in the adjoining villages.

4.1.3 Family Labour

Farmers’ economic conditions do not allow them to hire labor on permanent

basis. Therefore it was observed during survey that farmers used their family labor

partly for on farm and partly for off farm work to supplement their income. All family

members of respondent farmers including male, female and children were also

engaged at different levels in different cultural practices all round the year, Farmers,

21
Table 5. Number Of Off Farm Workers

Irrigated Rainfed

Total No of Family 287 223

members
Off farm Workers 35 55

Percent of off farm work 12% 24%

22
poor economic conditions, large family size and small land holdings were possible

reasons for employing family labor instead of permanent hired labor.

4.1.4 Access to Institutional Support Services (Agricultural Extension Services)

The major purpose of agricultural extension service was to bridge the gap

between the modern technology evolved at the research farms and that practiced by the

majority of the traditional farmers. Agricultural Extension Department had employed

the field staff for this purpose.

The field survey revealed that at Dharabi dam command area very few farmers

knew about the agricultural extension services. It might be owing to both the farmers

poor education level and inefficiency of the department of Agricultural extension. It

means that construction of Dharabi Dam was not followed by supporting services of

government institutions that was essential to better utilize the dam water.

4.2 FARM HOUSEHOLD ASSETS

It mainly deals with farm assets such as present value of land, farm machinery

farm implements and livestock.

23
 4.2.1 Farm assets

Land was the major item of the total farm household assets. The present per

hectare value of rainfed and irrigated land was reported to be about 357890/- and

537120 rupees respectively.

4.2.2 Farm Machinery

Farm machinery is in too much use in barani areas as a means to get higher

production as well as a time saving technique. The size of land holdings in barani areas

is small. In barani areas the farming is done on subsistence level, that is why, mostly

people are engaged in the off farm works too, and women have been given the

responsibility to do farming. It makes more use of farm machinery in barani areas

(Iqbal, 1989). The same trend was observed in the sample area. All the rainfed sample

farmers were using tractor and tractor driven implements. It was observed during

survey that the use of farm machinery was less in irrigated area as far as sowing of

crops was concerned, as the farmers used broadcast method for sowing of different

crops.

4.2.3 Livestock

Livestock is an important sector of agriculture in Pakistan and accounts for

nearly 52.2 percent of agricultural value added and about 11 percent of the GDP. Its

net foreign exchange earning of the country during the same period. The role of

livestock in rural economy may be realized from the fact that 30 ~35 million rural

population is engaged in livestock raising (GOP, 2008).

24
 Livestock are an important source of motive power for land cultivation, milk

and milk products. Almost every rural household maintained livestock in order to

supplement their cash income (Iqbal, 1989). During survey it was observed that in

village Kalar kahar mostly people had buffaloes and cows. Buffaloes were more in

number in irrigated lands (average 1.5 buffaloes per irrigated former than 0.45

buffaloes per rain fed farmer) because of availability of fodder crops in former areas.

People kept buffaloes to get milk and their dung for fuel. Livestock were handsome

source of their cash income.

4.3 OTHER ASPECTS OF DAM CONSTRUCTION

The resource farmer interview (given in Annex-2) was asked from four

responsible persons of the both the villages. It was about the community contribution

in the planning construction and maintenance of Dharabi Dam.

4.3.1 Community Contribution In Planning

The construction of Dharabi small dam had been almost completed. The village

community had forced to initiate the project. The government agencies prepared the

design/outlay of the dam. The village community was not involved in any amendment

in the outlay.

25
 4.3.2 Community Contribution in Dam Construction

For construction village community provided labor to a large extent.

Government financed the whole project. During construction employment

opportunities were generated for the villagers on average 150 men worked per day.

4.3.3 Realization of Actual Plan

The estimated area to come under dam irrigation was about 6400 acres and

about 2/3rd of the village communities were expected farm household beneficiaries

from dam water in village Kalar kahar. At the time of study about half of the estimated

area was under dam irrigation and about half of the households, beneficiaries from

dam water. The other half households of the Kalar kahar village, even having their

lands very close to the dam site, could not benefit from dam irrigation, except by using

turbine engines. It was due to the reason that barani lands are not leveled in that area

that is why the water distribution is not proper. It was observed that the dam had been

construction at some more elevation the number of beneficiaries would have been

more. The community could also get additional benefits by proper and organized

warabandi.

4.3.4 The Maintenance of Water Supply Channels and Water Courses

Small Dam organization was mainly responsible for the maintenance of water

supply channels. The contribution of community in the maintenance of dam and its

peripheries was almost negligible. The maintenance status of the water channels was

poor. The main reasons for poor condition of water channels were:

26
 1. Improper look after by Government agencies and

2. Soil sedimentation and growth of grasses in water channels.

4.4 FARM CHARACTRISTICS

Farm characteristic deal with salient features of farm, land distribution pattern

land use intensity, soil types, fragmentation of land holdings, cropping systems,

cropping intensity and Tenure status.

4.4.1 Salient Features of Farms

Production per unit area depends on size of the farm (Iqbal 1989). The main

problem of the barani tract was that mostly there were small sized land holdings and

fragmented that might reduce the total production of crops from these very fertile lands

(Iqbal 1989). The same was true for both the villages. The land utilization pattern of

sample farms by farm size in both the villages was given in Table. 6.

The data relating to the land utilization pattern of dam command area given in

table 8 shows that in Dharabi dam command area, the average farm size was 3.12 ha,

out of which 2.98 ha per farm was cultivated area. Of the farm the average size of

rainfed area was relatively higher than average size of irrigated area. The average size

of rainfed and irrigated lands were 2.17 and 1.97 ha respectively.

27
 4.4.2 Land Distribution Pattern

The land distribution pattern of rain fed and irrigated lands in both the villages

given in Table 7. The average size farm of less than 2 ha of land of irrigated area was

greater than that of rain fed area. It as evident from the date that 75% of irrigated

farmers and 48% of rainfed farmers had land holding less than 2 ha. The average size

of farm of 2~5 ha and more than 5 ha land in fainfed area was greater than that of

irrigated area. It was due to the reason that most of the sample respondents of irrigated

area also had rainfed land holding in rainfed areas so the sample size for percent

distribution of rainfed land was greater than that of irrigated area.

The sample size was large because most of the sample respondents of irrigated

area also have rainfed land holding in rainfed areas so the sample size for percent

distribution of rainfed land was greater than that of irrigated area.

4.4.3 Land Use Intensity

Land use intensity is defined as the ratio of cultivated area to the operational

holdings and is expressed in percentage. The data relating to the land use intensity of

both the villages was collected during the field survey and is presented in Table 7.

It indicates that the land use intensity of rain fed area was less than irrigated.

4.4.4 Soil Types

There can be four types of soils in the barani areas, namely, Lepara, Maira,

Khunder & rocky (Iqbal, 1989). Lepara land is the best quality land and majority of the

sample farmers of Dharabi dam command area had lepara land.

28
Table 6 Land Utilization Pattern of Sample Farms by Farm size

Land Utilization Pattern Farm size (Ha)

Average size of Total land holding 3.12

Average size of cultivated land 2.98

Average sizes of uncultivated land 0.41

Average size of irrigatged land holidng 1.97

Average size of Rainfed land holding 2.17

Table 7 Land Use Intensity

Operational Holdings Land use intensity (%)

Irrigated 51

Rainfed 32.5

29
 4.4.5 Fragmentation of Land Holding

Fragmentation refers to the existence of a number of physically scattered

parcels of land belong to the same operating farm unit. The sample respondents

usually had fragmented land in the Dharabi Dam command area.

4.4.6 Cropping Systems

Cropping systems represents the percent allocation of different crops in an area

(Iqbal, 1989). The cropping system of sample farmers was determined separately for

irrigated part of dam command area and un irrigated (barani) part of dam command

area by using the formula:

Percentage allocation = __Crop area x 100

Total rain fed / irrigated area

The percent area allocation to different crops in irrigated and barani lands is

given in the table 8.

The data in table 8 shows that the percent allocation of area to different crops

in irrigated area was 129% and that in the rainfed area, 65%. The results reveal that

percent area allocation of irrigated area was almost double than that of the rainfed area.

30
4.4.7 Cropping Intensity

Cropping intensity is defined as the ratio between the area under crops and the

area operated by the farmers and is reported as percentage (Iqbal, 1989). Cropping

intensity was calculated separately for irrigated and rainfed areas. Iqbal and Khan

(1991) had argued that cropping intensity of an area was influenced by soil condition,

climate, and availability of labor, water and farm machinery. A higher cropping

intensity indicated multiple cropping which could help in raising total revenue per

cultivated acre. The data related to cropping intensity is given in Table 9

The table 9 showed that rabi cropping intensity of irrigated area was only

64.8%, it was very much less. As compared to this the irrigated Kharif cropping

intensity was found to be 71.4%. It might be due to the fact that for irrigated Kharif

crops in case water is not applied still there is rain and crop can grow well.

The kharif cropping intensity of rain fed lands was found to be low as 25.93%.

It was due to the fact that in Kharif season farmers of rainfed area left fields fallow.

The farmers fulfilled fodder requirements by grasses from fallow lands. The rainfed

cropping intensity in rabi season was found to be 36.38%. It was due to the fact rainfed

farmer take risk, prepares the soil if rain happens then they can get higher yields

otherwise they will get something instead of nothing.

31
Table 8 Percent Area Allocation to Different Crops

Crops Percent area allocation %

Crop in irrigated area
Wheat 52.1
Sorgham 12.34
Maize 14.5
Ground nut 6.9
Millet 2.1
Canola 0.57
Reddish 1.12
Turnip 0.34
Spinach 0.51
Tori 0.01
Carrot 0.05
Cauli Flower 0.03
Okra 0.67
Tomotoes 0.72
Melon 0.13
Bittergourd 4.3
Onion/chillies 3.9
Tinda 0.05
Total crops in irrigated area 100%
Crops in Rain fed area
Wheat 33.41
Sorgham 9.84
Gram 3.22
Maize 4.91
Ground Nut 7.43
Gram 3.24
Sesame 0.257
Total crops in Rainfed area 65%

Table 9 Cropping Intensity Of Irrigated and Rainfed Crops

Rabi cropping intensity % Kharif Cropping intensity (%)

Irrigated 64.8% 71.4%
Rainfed 36.38 25.93

32
 4.4.8 Tenurial Status

Tenurial status is another variable which may affect the division of farmers for

long term investment in the farm and adoption of improved farming practices (Iqbal

1989). The data regarding the tenancy status of Dharabi dam sample farmers indicated

that 100% of them were owner operators.

4.5 FARM INPUTS USE

Farm input use and level of farm output have a direct bearing on farm income

realized (Iqbal, 1989). This part section deals with the cultural practices and farm

inputs use.

4.5.1 Cultural Practices

Appropriate tillage can contribute to better plant nourishment, which ultimately

can result in increased crop production (Iqbal, 1989). The data relating to the average

number of ploughing and planking are given in table 10

The average number of ploughing and planking varied from crop to crop. On

an overall basis, the average numbers of ploughing per cropped hectare of rainfed area

were higher as compared to that of irrigated one. It is due to the reason that rainfed

farmers want to conserve moisture, so after monsoon rains they plough the soil many

times to conserve moisture for next crop. Table 10 also shows that in irrigated areas of

Dharabi dam command area, mostly farmers were also growing vegetables that require

33
smooth seed bed and as such number of ploughing and planking for vegetables were

higher as compared to those for other crops sown in that area.

4.5.2 FARM INPUT

The main input used by the farmers of both the villages were farm yard

manure, chemical fertilizers, see and seed rate, farm labor, irrigation for crops and

feeding arrangement of livestock.

4.5.2.1 FARM YARD MANURE

Application of farmyard manure helps in improving the texture & fertility of

soil. The doses of FYM are dependent on the farm size and livestock strength. About

half of fertilizer requirements are fulfilled by FYM (Iqbal, 1989). The data on use of

farmyards manure was collected on 40 kg basis. During survey it was observed that the

use of farmyard manure was more in irrigated area and applied to most of the crops. It

was due to the fact that farmers in irrigated area had more number of livestock. The

amount of farmyard manure used in vegetables was generally higher. The amount of

farm yard manure used in both irrigated and a rainfed area is given in Table 11.

34
Table 10 Average number of Ploughing and planking of crop per Hectare on

Sample Farms

Crops Number of ploughing and Number of Ploughing and

Planking in Irrigated area Planking in Rainfed area

Wheat 5 6

Maize 5 5

Sorghum 4 5

Groundnut 3 4

Vegetables 7 -

Table 11 Average Quantity of Farm Yard Manure (40 Kgs/ha) applied on sample

Farms

Crops Farm yard manure in Farm yard manure in

Irrigated area (40 Kg/ha) Rainfed area (40 Kg/ha)

Wheat 5.01 2.34

Maize 9.87 4.35

Sorghum 7.8 6.4

Groundnut - -

Vegetables 10.8-15.3 -

4.5.2.3 CHEMICAL FERTILIZER

35
 Chemical fertilizer use has become a common practice among the farmers and

they apply some quantity of fertilizers to their major crops, either at the time of sowing

or at any other appropriate stage. As a result of this higher crop output could be

obtained. Dose of fertilizer applied can vary with fertility status of the soil, farmer’s

knowledge and their financial resources (Iqbal, 1989). The dose of fertilizer was

computed in terms of nutrient kilograms per treated hectare. The chemical fertilizers,

which were in common use of sample farmers of both of the villages were urea, DAP.

The average quantity of chemical fertilizer (Kg/ha) applied on irrigated and rainfed

farms is given in Table 12.

The comparison among crops of irrigated and rain fed areas showed that the

use of chemical fertilizer in terms of nutrient kilograms per treated hectares was more

in case of irrigated areas except for sorghum. The use of chemical fertilizer was much

higher in vegetables as compared to other crops. It was due to the reason that more

water was available to irrigated formers they were getting more yield, and grow

vegetables on commercial bases.

36
Table 12 Average Quantity of Chemical Fertilizer (Kgs/ha) applied on sample

farms.

Crops Chemical fertilizer in Chemical Fertilizer in

Irrigated area (Kg/ha) Rainfed area (Kg/ha)

N P N P

Wheat 69.1 52 36.7 27.8

Maize 112 52.5 45 20.5

Sorghum 106.7 - 145 -

Groundnut - - - -

Vegetables 114.1-170 66-115.3 - -

Table 13 Average Seed rate (Kg) of crops on sample farms

Crops Average seed rate in Average seed rate in

irrigated area (Kg/Ha) Rainfed area (Kg/Ha)

Wheat 170 107

Maize 32.6 57

Sorghum 94.5 119.2

Groundnut 98.1 116

Vegetables 4.25~6.25 -

4.5.2.3 Seed and Seed Rate

37
 The use of certified seeds was not a practice in this area probably mainly owing

to lack of extension services and low literacy rate. Farmers in Dharabi dam command

area were reported to use domestic seeds for rabi and kharif crops and purchased seeds

for vegetables.

The seed rate used by farmers for wheat in irrigated area was higher than that

in rain fed. It was thus because farmers in irrigated area used broadcast method for

wowing of wheat while farmers in rain fed area used drill for this purpose. The seed

rate for other crops in rain fed area was generally higher as compared to irrigated ones,

because due to doughtiness and lack of proper moisture the chances of seed

germination are less in rain fed area than in irrigated one.

4.5.2.4 Irrigation

Main purpose of Dharabi dam was to irrigate the crops. Adequate availability

of irrigation facilities was essential to obtain higher crop yield. The main irrigation

method from Dharabi dam, was through water channels and water courses network.

Water distribution among farmers was done through warabandi. Farmer used water on

their turn. Land leveling is an important factor, which determines the irrigation

method. The lands of this region were not well leveled, some being at high level and

others at low level reveling distribution of dam water through ordinary water course /

channels are inefficient method of water distribution.

38
 Adequate availability of irrigation facilities is essential to obtain higher crop

yield. The information relating to the average number of irrigations applied to various

crops was collected during the field survey and is presented in table 14.

During the survey a discrepancy was observed for some crops like maize and

some vegetables among the number of irrigation applied by sample farmers and those

recommended by the Department of Agriculture, Government of the Punjab, Lahore.

This discrepancy might be attributed to inadequate extension services in the area.

The water from Dharabi dam is not used for drinking purpose. It is used

domestically by households for washing clothes etc. However, its main purpose is to

irrigate the crops. Other source of irrigation in Dharabi dam command area was hand

pump.

4.5.2.4a Water Rates

The water rates paid by farmers of Dharabi dam command area are given in the

table 16.

39
Table 14 Average Number of Irrigations applied to various crops

Crops Average Number of Irrigation / season

Wheat 5

Groundnut 2

Maize 07

Sorghum 04

Onions 11

Chilles 15

Tomato 12

Reddish 14

Spinach 13

Garlic 09

Potato 11

Okra 09

Turnip 14

40
Table 15 Recommended Average Numbers of Irrigations

Crops Recommended

Wheat 4~5

Maize 5~6

Groundnut 5~6

Berseem 10~12

Vegetables 10~12

Table 16 Water Rates for Different Crops

Crops Water rates

Wheat 256

Maize 212

Groundnut 196

Berseem 154

Vegetables 558

41
 4.5.2.5 Farm Labour

Family members were generally carrying out farm work while some causal

labour was hired at the time of crop harvest and also for other activities like irrigating

the fields, interculture and pesticide sprays. The employment of permanent hired

labour was found to be negligible. Time spent by family labour, causal hired labour

and permanent hired labour in form activities was converted into the opportunity cost.

4.5.2.6 Livestock Feeding Arrangements

The forage source for livestock varies from season to season. Mostly all the

barani farmers used maize and sorghum (Jowar) as kharif fodder and oilseeds used as

rabi fodder. Cotton seed cake and wheat bran were major type of concentrates used for

livestock. The feeding cost of livestock on irrigated and rainfed sample farms is given

in Table 17.

4.6 FARM OUTPUT

This part deals with the farm outputs of crops. This section also relates to the

production and sale of milk.

42
Table 17 Feeding Cost of Livestock on Sample Farms

Irrigated areas Rainfed areas

Type of Fodder Feeding cost in Rs. Feeding cost in Rs.

Rabi fodder 15500 10400

Kharif Fodder 9668 7250

Straw 72500 5910

CSC 6100 5560

Health Treatment 1800 1250

Wheat grind 1450 1050

Other feed expenditure 1200 750

Gur / raw sugar 450 690

Total cost 108668 32860

Cost per animal unit 7842 7520

A data shows that feeding cost per adult animal unit was significantly higher on

irrigated area as compared to rain fed area.

43
 4.6.1 Crop Yield

The data on average yield of various crops in overall dam command area, is

presented in table 18.

A comparison of the data given in table reveals that the average yield of major

crops was significantly higher on irrigated part of the dam command area than that of

rain fed one. This may be attributed to higher fertilizer dose (table 15), and access to

dam water in the irrigated part of the dam command area.

4.6.2 Average Prices Received For Crops

The data regarding the average prices received for crops during the study

period was also collected during the field surveys and is presented in Table 19.

The data shows that the average prices of vegetable were relatively higher as

compared to other crops except groundnut

44
TABLE 18 Average Yields of Major Crops on Sample Farms

Crops Average Yield in Average yield in

Irrigated areas (40Kg/ha) Rainfed areas (40 Kg/ha)

Wheat 50 37.34

Maize 71.14 30.03

Sorghum 158 98.8

Groundnut 69.16 59.28

Vegetables 158-198

Table 19 Average Prices ( Rs. 40kgs) of Various Crops

Crops Price

(Rs/40 Kgs)

Wheat 800

Maize 500

Sorghum 70

Groundnut 2000

Vegetables 500~1900

4.6.4 Main Marketing Problems

45
 The following were reported to be the main marketing problems in the Dharabi

dam command area.

1. The farm to market roads was absent either or in non metaled form. It kept

farmers from sending their product to market at proper time and in large quantity.

2. There was no bridge on nalla manda and farmers had to face difficulty to cross it

without proper transportation.

3. There was no proper transportation facility available in the area.

4.6.5 Milk Production, Consumption and Sale

Buffaloes, cows, goats and sheep all contribute to milk production. In farm

enterprises, milk production supplements and stabilizes farm income. Milk is also an

important component of human diet. According to the house hold and income

expenditure survey 2004, the average consumer spends one fourth of his food budget

on milk. The data regarding annual production, consumption and sale of milk on

sample farms was collected during field survey and presented in table 20

Table 20 Milk Production, Consumption and Sale of milk (kgs) on sample farms

46
Mile production Liters per animal

Irrigated 2300

Rainfed 1950

The farm house hold consumed about 60-70% of the total milk production

where as the remaining production was sold out to supplement their income. The

comparison indicates that irrigated farmers had higher milk production as compare to

the rain fed. It might be due to better feeding of animal at irrigated farms.

4.7 FARM AND HOUSEHOLD INCOME

4.7.1 Gross Margin Analysis

Gross marginal analysis is a technique, which assists farm managers when

calculating profitability of alternative plans. Gross margin may be define as returns

above variable costs, and are expressed per unit of some common resource (per hectare

or per head of animal). It is a very useful measure of efficiency for both single activity

farm business and multiple activity plans of a business. (Chaudhry et al., 1995).

To calculate Gross Farm Income firstly, enterprise budgets were prepared. For

enterprise budgets returns and costs of different enterprises were calculated, in

estimating the returns from an agricultural enterprise or a production system, an

important distinction is drawn between variable and fixed cost. The market value of

47
the produce (and that of any by-product) of a production system is defined as its

output. Normally this value is based on prices of the farm. When the variable costs are

subtracted from the estimate of the output, the remainder is called the Gross Margin

(Chaudhry et al., 1995).

The difference between the output and the variable costs, usually calculated on

per acre or per hectare basis, is a very useful measure of the performance of an

enterprise and the contribution that it can make to farm income or profitability.

Gross margin at average farm level was calculated by different area allocation

to different enterprises multiplied by Gross Margin / unit area. The gross margins of

crops at farm level are presented in Table 21 prices used for different crops to calculate

outputs is given in Annexure 3.

The value of Gross margin per unit area/ha of irrigated and rainfed crops were

18152.44 and 15837.28 rupees, respectively. Thus, irrigated crops fetched more

returns than rainfed crops. The calculation of gross Margin and other performance

indicators for livestock enterprise follow essentially the same principles as for

cropping enterprises. The value of output per unit farm of buffaloes and cows is given

in table 22.The value of output per unit of irrigated livestock was higher than rainfed

ones. It was due to the fact the availability of fodder to irrigated livestock’s

48
TABLE 21 GROSS MARGINS OF CROPS AT FARM LEVEL

Crops Observed Average Gross Margin Gross Return

Area allocation Ha) Per unit area/ha At Farm Level

Irrigated Crops

Wheat 2.23 13456 30006.9

Soghum 0.43 13025 5600.75

Maize 0.51 20456 10432.6

Groundnut 0.26 69540 18080.4

Berseem 0.17 1913 325.21

Raddish 0.04 31567 1262.68

Turnip 0.06 23456 1407.36

Spinach 0.02 14321 286.42

Carrot 0.002 25613 51.226

Cauliflower 0.0048 24367 116.962

Tori 0.005 23416 117.08

Coriander 0.001 2130 2.13

Okra 0.03 43521 1305.63

Tomatoes 0.02 36781 735.62

Melon 0.03 24367 731.01

Bitter gourd 0.01 21456 214.56

Onions 0.19 10987 2087.53

Chilies 0.12 14356 1722.72

49
 Garlic 0.08 23222 1857.76

Tinda 0.009 32781 295.029

Brangil 0.0006 12233 7.3398

Total 4.2224 76646.9

Irrigated GM per unit Farm 18152.44

Rainfed crops

Wheat 1.24 10231 12686.44

Sorghum 0.51 4567 2329.17

Maize 0.11 7685 845.35

Groundnut 0.25 61238 15309.5

Gram 0.16 29876 4780.16

Total 2.27 35950.62

Rainfed GM per unit farm 15837.28

Table 22 Value of Output per Unit Farm of Buffaloes and Cows.

Livestock Value of output in irrigated Value of output in Rain

area in rupees fed area in rupees

Buffalo 91400 48725

Cow 61433 43200

4.7.2 Nature of Farm Costs

50
 Farm costs include cash cost and imputed cost. Cash costs are those costs

which are met “Out of pocket’. The items included in the cash cost are seed, fertilizer,

farm yard manure, causal labor hired, permanent labor, threshing, payment to artisans

and livestock rearing (Iqbal, 1989).

Imputed cost is defined as the cost for which no cash expenditure is incurred;

instead these are met by using resources already available with the farm household.

Imputed costs include the imputed wages of family workers, rental value of land etc

(Iqbal, 1989). In the study the costs of family labor, rental value of land, irrigation

labor, and additional labor from time to time for different activities were used as

imputed costs.

The cost per unit of crops of irrigated farm is higher than rainfed farm. It was

due to the more usage of inputs. The average annual cost per unit farm of irrigated and

rainfed crops were found to be 21569.52 and 13466 rupees respectively. The cost per

unit of animal of irrigated and rainfed areas presented in table 23 was also calculated

by same procedure.

51
Table 23 Average annual Cost per Unit Sample Farm

Crops Observed Average Cost Cost

Area allocation HA Per unit area/ha At Farm Level

Irrigated Crops

Wheat 1.31 24567 32182.77

Soghum 0.43 8678 3731.54

Maize 0.51 13426 6847.26

Groundnut 0.26 9658.5 2511.21

Barseem 0.17 12453 2117.01

Raddish 0.04 22345 893.8

Turnip 0.06 24537 1472.22

Spinach 0.02 21987 439.74

Carrot 0.002 18617 37.234

Cauliflower 0.065 19876 1291.94

Tori 0.005 9768.6 48.843

Coriander 0.001 6745 6.745

Okra 0.03 20567 617.01

Tomatoes 0.02 36781 735.62

Melon 0.03 14678 440.34

Bitter gourd 0.01 21456 214.56

Onions 0.19 53261 10119.59

Chiliies 0.12 67545.2 8105.424

52
 Garlic 0.08 6931 554.48

Tinda 0.009 16782 151.038

Brangil 0.0006 18796 11.2776

Total 3.3626 449455.3 72529.65

Cost per unit Farm 21569.52

Rainfed crops

Wheat 1.24 9125 11315

Soghum 0.51 4567 2329.17

Maize 0.11 7685 845.35

Groundnut 0.25 61238 15309.5

Gram 0.16 29876 4780.16

Total 2.27 113597 35950.62

Cost per unit farm 13466

Table 24 Cost of per Unit Animal of irrigated and Rainfed Farms

53
 Cost per unit animal in Cost per unit area in

Livestock irrigated area Rainfed area

Buffalo 6542 6231

Cow 4131 3980

Table 25 Whole Farm Budget

Enterprise Irrigated Rainfed

Benefits Costs Benefit Cost

Crops 34582 28634 16724 9865

Livestock 168568 12462 106542 14580

Whole Farm 186524 56420 124580 19040

The cost per unit animal of irrigated area for buffalo and cow was higher than

rainfed ones.

54
 4.7.3 Whole Farm Budget

The farm budget is a physical and financial plan for the operation of the farm

for some period of time. The total farm budget is prepared as an aid in organizing the

entire farm business.

In whole farm economic analysis, the farm is considered as complete entity.

The whole crop and livestock production programme is reviewed and the use of farm

resource is considered on an overall basis. This type of analysis is undertaken to show

the anticipated consequences, in terms of selected measures of performance, of some

proposed farm plan. The costs and returns analysis accounts cash and non cash costs as

well as both fixed and variable costs (Chaudhry et al., 1995). The whole farm budget

was prepared by adding the benefits of crops and livestock of irrigated area and also

the costs of crops and livestock of irrigated area. Same was adopted for the calculation

of whole farm budget for rainfed area. The whole farm budget of irrigated and rainfed

farms are presented in Table 25

In whole farm budget the costs and returns of irrigated area, both are greater

than rainfed ones

4.7.4 Benefit Cost Ratio

55
 It is a profitability indicator, which expresses the relationship between the sum

of net benefits and capital costs over the life of the project. It is in fact, a form of input

output analysis that is useful for on farm trails. Cash and non cash costs and benefits

are included in deriving appropriate ratios (Chaudry et al., 1995).

To calculate the benefit cost ratio, the benefits and costs of irrigated crops and

livestock were added, respectively. And then ration of benefit to cost was calculated.

Same procedure was adopted for rainfed ones. The benefit cost ration of crops and

livestock are in Table 26 and 27 respectively

Here, it was observed that the output level in relation to input use level was

lower for irrigated farms.

The same procedure was adopted for livestock as that for crops. The benefit

cost ration of irrigated livestock was higher than rainfed one. The difference of benefit

cost ration of irrigated and rainfed buffalo was significant. The benefit cost ration of

irrigated as 14.06 and was found greater than rainfed buffalo 7.10.

Table 26 Benefit Cost Ratio of crops (per Farm unit)

56
Crops Benefit Cost B/c Ratio

Irrigated 42568 34354 1.2359

Rainfed 24731 18765 1.3145

Table 27 Benefit Cost Ratio of livestocks (per Farm unit)

Livestock Benefit Cost B/C Ratio

Irrigated Buffalo 105412 9784 10.77

Rainfed Buffalo 56785 6586 7.10

Irrigated Cow 56435 4120 13.69

Rainfed cow 46780 4230 11.06

4.7.5 Marginal Analysis

57
 The purpose of marginal analysis was to reveal just how the net benefits from

an investment increase as the amount invested increases. An easier way of expressing

this relationship is by calculating the marginal rate of return. This is simply the

marginal net benefit divided by the marginal cost expressed as a percentage. The

marginal analysis is a highly useful measure of judging and ascertaining farmer’s

acceptability of new innovations at the farm level. The marginal rate of return of

Dharabi dam is presented in Table.28

Incremental NB

MRR = ________________ × 100

Incremental TCV

65078

= ________ × 100

13468

= 483%

This means that for every Rupee invested in the application of dam water

facility, farmers can expect to recover Rs. 1 and also obtains an Additional Rs.4.83.

4.7.6 Total Household Income

58
 Total farm income is the most commonly used measure of economic

performance of the farm. The total farm households income was calculated by the

addition of gross margins of crops and livestock (obtained by enterprise budgets) and

also the off farms income for both irrigated and rain fed areas. The average annual

total household income of users and non users is given in the table 29

The total household income of irrigated area is much greater than rainfed area.

Livestock contribute about 80% and 83 % in total farm income in irrigated and rainfed

areas, respectively in the study area. The off farm income share of rainfed area 2.97%

was more than irrigated one 2.85.

4.7.7 Average off farm household income

The off farm households receive their income from professional and non

professional sources. Professional source includes artisan income, while non

professional source comprised of income from farm labor, non farm labor government

service, private service and livestock rearing. The average off farm household income

is also included in the total household income.

Table 28 Marginal Rate of Return

59
 Irrigated Rain fed Differences

Benefits 167546 102468 65078

Costs 31486 18018 13468

Table 29 Total Household Income

Irrigated Rainfed

Enterprise Household % share Household % share

income (Rs.) income (Rs.)
Crops 38981 19.4 19217 15.8

Livestock 156732 77.4 97685 80.5

Off farm income 6543 3.2 4356 3.5

Total 202256 121258

60
 SUMMARY

Barani area can play a significant role in attaining self sufficiency in food.

However, water is a limiting factor for agriculture development in these areas. Therein

agricultural production mainly depends upon the nature and extent of rainfall.

Nevertheless, there is high potential for the development and management of water

resources in these areas. Crop yield could be increased manifolds by adopting proper

water resource development and management practices. Water resource development

and management are concomitant. Otherwise, the water resource developed would be

lost without playing a significant role in the crop production.

Keeping in view all these problems, small Dam Organization constructs 50

small Dams in Barani tract under four different projects. ICARDA (International

Centre of Agriculture in Dry Areas) is doing applied research on enhancing water

productivity on Dharabi dam in District Chakwal. With the collaboration and financial

support of ICARDA the present study on Production Possibilities in catchment areas,

Tehsil Kalar Kahar, was carried out.

For the purpose of the study, the farmers were divided into two categories

irrigated and rainfed farmers. The data on different aspects to calculate Gross Margin

from both categories was collected on comprehensive Questionnaire.

61
 From the survey farms, it was found that the irrigated farm seems to be

enjoying more water advantages over the rain fed because of availability of water. The

analysis by different categories of farmers did not reveal any considerable difference

in respect of general education, technical education and experience. It was observed

that people in this area have trend for government services. The socio economic

conditions of the village Chak Khushi not up to mark. The educational facilities

available were only up to elementary school level for both girls and boys. The basic

infrastructure and basic facilities like post office, bus stand, hospital electricity,

telephone, sewerage system etc were not available in the villages of the study areas.

The average irrigated land holding and rainfed landholding was 1.97 ha and

2.17 ha respectively, about 75% irrigated land and 48% of rainfed land was found less

than 2 ha. The land holdings in both the villages were fragmented.

Rabi and Kharif cropping intensity of irrigated area were found to be 64.8%

and 71.4% respectively. Land is the major item of the total farm household assets. The

present worth value of irrigated land is almost double than the rainfed land. It was

observed that livestock were the handsome source of the cash income of the people of

the village Kalar kahar (irrigated).

As far cultural practices, average number of ploughing and plankings of rainfed

lands were more than the irrigated ones. To conserve moisture numbers of ploughing

were more in rainfed area. The other inputs like chemical fertilizer, Farm Yard manure

62
was found to be applied in greater amount in irrigated area than in rainfed one. The

farm yard manure applied to irrigated wheat was 5.01 m/ha and 2.34 m/ha to rainfed

wheat.

The chemical fertilizer N and P applied to irrigated wheat was 69.1 and 52

Kgs/ha, respectively and 36.7 and 27.8 Kgs/ha, respectively in rainfed area. The

irrigation method in irrigated area from Dharabi dam was through water channels and

water courses network, Hand pump was the water sources other than dam water in

both the villages.

Average yield of major crops in irrigated farms was found to be more than that

in rain fed. The more yield of irrigated farms was due to availability of dam water. The

wheat in irrigated area was found to be 50 m/ha and 37.7m/ha in rain fed area. The

irrigated farmers cultivate vegetables on commercial basis and it proved to be strong

source of income. The yield of vegetables was found to be 160~190 m/ha in irrigated

area. As far as marketing of crops was concerned the farmers sold their product to

nearly markets. There were some problems faced by farmers while doing marketing, as

these was no metaled and not any other efficient source of transport present in the

respective area.

The value of out put per farm of crops and livestock of irrigated farms was

found to be significantly more than rainfed. For irrigated crops the value of out put per

unit farmer was found Rs. 18152.44 and for rainfed farm it was 15837.28. The value of

output per unit farm of livestock’s in irrigated area was found to be Rs. 152833 and in

63
rainfed area it was Rs. 92925. The cost of per unit farm of crops and livestock was

found to be more irrigated farm than in rainfed farms. The cost per unit of irrigated

crops was found to be Rs. 21569.52 and for rainfed it was Rs. 13466. For livestock’s

in irrigated area the cost per unit animal was found to be Rs. 10673 and for rainfed

area it was found to be Rs. 10221. It might be due to fact the usage of input was more

in irrigated farms.

The average annual total house hold income of irrigated farms was found to be

more than that of rainfed. The total household income of irrigated area was Rs, 186124

and for rainfed it was found to be Rs. 124580. It was found out that the livestock’s

contribute about 80% of the share of the total household income in irrigated area and

in rainfed area they contribute about 83%. In rainfed farms the percentage share of off

farm income about 2.97% was found to be more than irrigated farms which was about

2.8%.

64
 CONCLUSION

There is need for research in the barani (rainfed) area of Pakistan to diagnose

factors limiting productivity and to develop recommendations that can be adopted by

farmers to improve productivity. Past research has often not provided

recommendations that are relevant to farmers of the area. They have generally been

developed without economic analysis to determine the most profitable and least risky

practices. Moreover recommendations have not considered differences in land type,

rainfall and crop rotation in the area and have provided general recommendations to

cover the entire region. In addition, the recommendations provide a complete package

of technology, which is very costly for farmers to adopt. Given these deficiencies of

research, and poor extension services, it is not surprising that many farmers have not

adopted the recommendations being provided by research and extension.

It was observed during study that farmers in both the irrigated as well as the

rainfed must shift from conventional crops to high value crops. They must start

farming on the commercial basis. They can increase their income by an appreciable

amount by commercial farming of vegetables. As they have opportunity they can send

their product to nearby Islamabad urban market.

65
 Government authorities must take care for the maintenance of dam structure

and watercourses network. In order to meet the safety requirements a program of

periodic inspection of dam should be introduced in Dharabi dam command area.

The area adjoining to the dam sites where water of Dharabi dam was not

available. Lift irrigation scheme or system should be provided so that number of

beneficiaries of dam water can be increased.

There is need for proper agricultural extension service in the command area of

Dharabi dam that they bridge the gap between the modern technology involved at the

research farms and that practiced by the majority of the traditional farmers through

massive transfer of technology. Proper agricultural extension service can provide

guidance to farmers how they can maximize the profit by increasing the output level

and decreasing input use level.

The sampled farmers in both the villages were generally found lacking in

technical knowledge regarding crop production and livestock rearing, it thus clearly

necessitates organizing training programs and strengthening of agricultural extension

services through modern method. Majority of the farmers complained about the non

availability of agricultural extension service. To fully exploit the benefits of additional

investment made at small dams in the form of improved irrigation network, not only

the share of high value crops in the cropping pattern should improve, but also some in

traditional crops may also have to be introduced. This requires an enlightened and

66
imaginative extension service. Extension stall should be able to motivate farmers to

bring about desired changes in cropping pattern and adopt recommended farming

practices.

67
 LITERARTURE CITED

Ashraf, M., F.U. Hassan, M. A. Khan (1999). Water conservation and its optimum utilization

in barani areas. Journal of Science, Technology and Development, 18(1): 28-32.

Azhar A.M. (1995). Yields in canal command areas. Journal of Engineering and Applied

Sciences. 4(1):109-116

Bennie ATP, Hofman JE, Coetzee MJ and Very HS (1994) Storage and Utilization of Rain

Water in Soils for Stabilizing Crop Production in Semi-Arid Areas. (In Afrikaans).

WRC Report No. 227/1/94. Water Research Commission, Pretoria.

Bhutta I.A. (1999). Achievments and issues in 20th Century in Small Dams (Rainwater

Harvesting). In Proceedings of the national workshop on Water resources

achievements and issues in 20th Century and challenges for the next millennium.

Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources, Islamabad-Pakistan, pp.64-69

Botha JJ, Van Rensburg LD, Anderson JJ, Hensley M, Machelli MS, Van Staden PP,

Kundhlande G, Groenewald DG and Baiphethi MN (2003) Water Conservation

Techniques on Small Plots in Semi-Arid Areas to Enhance Rainfall Use Efficiency,

Food Security, and Sustainable Crop Production. WRC Report No. 1176/1/03. Water

Research Commission, Pretoria

68
Chaudry, M. A., B. Ahmad and M. Sharif . 1995. Hand Book for Economic Analysis of

Experimental Data. Agri. Social sciences Res. Centre, Faculty of Agri. Eco. and Rural

Sociology, Uni. of Agri., Faislabad.p.23-28

Cheema and Bandaragoda D.J. (1997). Base line survey for farmers organizations of mirwal

and Shahpur small dams, Punjab, Pakistan. International Irrigation Management

institute.

Directorate of Soil conservation. 1997. A Brief on Second Barani Area Development

Project.Directorate of Soil Conservation Punjab, Rawalpindi.p.15-16

GOP. 2008. Economic Survey. Govt. Pakistan, Finance Division, Economic Advisory Wing.

Islamabad. 8.

Gujarati, D. N. (1995). Basic Econometrics New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

IIMI (1999). Social Organization for improved system management and sustainable irrigation

agriculture in small dams (Inception report). International irrigation Management

institute.

Iqbal, M.S. 1989. Bench mark survey of khokhar Zer/ Surlah Small Dams. Punjab Eco. Res.

Inst., Lahore. Pub. No.254. 117

69
Iqbal, S. M and S. A. Khan.1991.An assessment of Agriculture Development in the existing

Small Dams Command Area. Punjab Eco. Res. Ins., Lahore. Pub. No. 280. 53-75

Iqbal M.S., S.A. Shahid (1992). An Assessment of agricultural development in the

rehabilitated small dams command area. Punjab Economic Research Institute, Lahore

Keller, A., R. Sakthivadivel and D. Seckler (2000).Water scarcity and the role of storage in

development. International Water Management Institute (IWMI) research Report No.

39.

Khan M.J., M.A Khan, M. Shraf, S.A. Shahid (1998). Screening Survey of potential Small

Dam Sites in Punjab. Punjab Economic Research Institute, Lahore Publication No.242.

Kidsom, A. (2003). An essay in Production Functions and Empirical study in Total Factor

Productivity Growth, http://www.geocities.com/jeab_cu/paper/product.htm (assessed,

02/05/2003).

Macours, K., and Swinnen, J. F. M. (1997). Causes of Output Decline in Economic

Transition: The Case of Central and Eastern European Agriculture. Department of

Agricultural Economics Policy Research Working Paper, Katholieke Universiteit

Leuven, Belgium.

70
MINFAL, (2008). Economic Survey of Pakistan, 2007-2008. Ministry of Food, Agriculture

and Livestock, Government of Pakistan

Molnar, I. (1965). Production in Relation to Rainfall, Super phosphate and Erosion, Australian

Journal of Agricultural Economics 9(2):169-175

Mugabe, F. T., Hodnett, M. G. , Senzanje, A. , 2003. Opportunities for increasing productive

water use from dam water: a case study from semi-arid Zimbabwe. Agric. Water

Manage. 62,149–163

NESPAK (1991). Evaluation of small dams in Punjab and N. W. F. P. Volume II − Part A-C,

Govt. of Pakistan, Planning and Development Division.

Ogbeide H. E., E.Uyigue, S. Oshodin (2003) Socio-economic and Environmental Performance

of Dams. Case Study of Ojirami Dam Nigeria.

Renfro, R. Z. “The value of participation in development- relevance to soil and water

conservation”internetsite:http://www.adbi.org/files/the_value_of_participation_in_

development_keynote_final.pdf.(March 9, 2005)

Shahid S. A., M. Ashraf, K. Ata, Mazhar-ul-Haq (1996). Evaluation of Small Dams Project in

Punjab. Punjab Economic Research Institute.

71
Tarar, R. N. (1999), Surface water achievements and issues in 20th century, Proceedings:

National workshop on water resources achievements and issues in 20th century and

challenges for the next Millennium, June 28-30, 1999, PCRWR, Islamabad

72
 Annex-1

Cost of input Use

Particulars Unit Wheat (Ha) Maize(Ha)

Irrigated Rainfed Irrigated Rainfed

Deep Ploughing No - 1 - 1

Ploughing No 4 3 2 2

Ploughing &Planking No 2 3 1 2

Drill No - 1 - -

Manure 40kg 6.98 3.24 14.75 5.86

Seed Kg 172 118 34.6 63

Fertilizer N Kg 76.1 42.36 124.6 48.64

P Kg 55 34.5 56.8 24.8

Irrigation labor Hr 6.9 - 6.7 -

Water rates Rs 256 - 234 -

Land rent Rs 14678 5698 14678 5698

Labor(Additional) Day 40 40 - 40

Harvesting Day/kg 149.33kg 149.33kg 40 60

Threshing Day/kg 149.33kg 149.33kg - -

Interculture Day - - 79 60

Labor (Thinning) Day - - - 60

Sorghum Ground Nut

73
 (Ha) (Ha)

Irrigated Rainfed Irrigated Rainfed

Deep Ploughing No - 1 - 1

Ploughing No 4 3 2 2

Ploughing & No 2 3 1 2

Planking

Drill No - 1 - -

Manure 40kg 9.38 6.24 - -

Seed Kg 108.2 124.6 98.6 122

Fertilizer N Kg 111 142.5 - -

P Kg - - - -

Irrigation labor Hr 6.9 - 6.9 -

Water rates Rs 256 - 234 -

Land rent Rs 14678 5698 14678 5698

Labor(Additional) Day 40 40 - 40

Harvesting Day 60 60 60 60

Threshing Day - - - -

Interculture Day - - 40 40

Labor (Thinning) Day - - - 60

74
 Particulars Unit Vegetables

Ploughing No 4

Ploughing & Planking No 3

Manure 40 kg 12.2.-14.8

Seed Kg 5-6

Fertilizer N Kg 110.5-182

P Kg 70-120.2

Irrigation labor Hr 7.24

Water rates Rs 624

Land rent Rs 14678

Labor(Additional) Day 40

Harvesting Day 40

Interculture Day 40

Labor (Thinning) Day 7.46

Plant protection measures No 1.4

75
 Annex-2

Yield of Crops

Particulars Unit Wheat Maize (Ha)

Irrigated Rain fed Irrigated Rainfed

Grain/Produce 40 kg 60 31.3 62.7 26.6

Straw/by product 40 kg 64.5 56.84 91.75 60.54

Thinning 40 kg - - - 60.64

Sorgham Groundnut

Irrigated Rainfed Irrigated Rainfed

Grain/ produce 40 kg 168 96.4 72.16 62.16

Yield of Vegetables

Particulars Unit Vegetables

GRAIN/Produce 40 kg 169-210

76
 Annex-3

Prices of Enterprises ( Crops and Livestock) to calculate Out puts

Enterprises Prices

Crops Prices in Rs 40/kg

Wheat 800

Maize 600

Sorghum 60

Ground nut 200

Berseem 90

Potato 600

Onion 1000

Carrot 300

Cauliflower 420

Tauri 400

Okra 450

Tomatoes 500

Melon 120

Garlic 600

Brangil 450

Buffalo milk per liter 30

Cow milk per liter 30

77

View publication stats