On The Problem of Shunt Reactor Tripping During Single-And Three-Phase Auto-Reclosing
On The Problem of Shunt Reactor Tripping During Single-And Three-Phase Auto-Reclosing
On The Problem of Shunt Reactor Tripping During Single-And Three-Phase Auto-Reclosing
Abstract—The application of shunt reactors (both controlled (TPAR) auto-reclosing. The resonance overvoltage may occur
and uncontrolled) on HVAC overhead transmission lines im- only during SPAR.
proves operational characteristics, but at the same time it brings
One of the most effective solutions to both problems is
the line closer to the resonance. Operation of the shunt reactor-
compensated transmission line that is close to the resonance, the resonance detuning by shutting down the shunt reactor(s)
causes a large number of problems which in particular can during TPAR and SPAR. However, as is shown below, the
be solved by temporary tripping of the reactor(s). The article tripping of the shunt reactor(s) in this situation may also be
focuses on some aspects of the SF6 shunt reactor circuit breaker fraught with difficulties, related to the possible occurrence
operations during one-phase and three-phase auto-reclosing. In
of not-breaking currents with a high content of aperiodic
particular, the problem of accident-free shunt reactor tripping,
as well as possible ways to solve it are discussed. components flowing through the CB of the reactor. And, as
Index Terms—circuit breakers, energy dissipation, power sys- will be shown later, apparently, none of the standard technical
tem simulation, short-circuit currents, transmission lines, zero solutions for linear SF6 CB can be directly applied to the
current switching. identified problem for reactor SF6 CB. Thus, the objective of
the paper can be summarized as follows:
I. INTRODUCTION 1) Attract the attention of technicians and equipment
Shunt reactors (SR) (both controlled and uncontrolled) in manufacturers. The final answer to the question about
HVAC transmission lines are applied to compensate for the the need for special measures can be provided only by
excess reactive power. Being very important components of full-scale experiments, but not by mathematical models.
electric power systems, they have to be protected against ab- If necessary it is proposed to introduce a new CB
normal conditions. From this perspective, the most crucial ele- parameter that would characterize the maximum amount
ment is a reactor circuit breaker (CB) whose failure may lead of energy that can be safely dissipated by one pole of
to serious consequences not only for the nearby equipment, the breaker.
but for the power system as a whole. The SR circuit breaker 2) Offer an alternative solution and discuss its advan-
switching characteristics depend on the installation method. tages and disadvantages. It is proposed to solve the
In [1] two most typical cases were studied and compared problem by introducing a power resistor unit into the
– installation at line terminals and at a substation busbar. circuit of the SR.
Reactors compensating the reactive power of a long HVAC
transmission line are usually switched on and off simultane- II. OPERATING FEATURES OF COMPENSATED LINES
ously with the line, their breakers are connected directly to the
line and not to the substation bus bars (Fig.1). On the one hand, Let us briefly explain the necessity for tripping the SR of
the application of SR improves operational characteristics, but the compensated transmission line during SPAR and TPAR.
on the other hand, it brings the line closer to the resonance. The degree of compensation for capacitive reactance of the
Operation of the line that is close to the resonance, causes a transmission line using the SR is defined by the following
large number of problems associated with overvoltages, and formula [3]:
with the necessity for small aperiodic current tripping. The
problem of small aperiodic current tripping is particularly
relevant for the modern SF6 circuit breakers [2], especially of
auto-compression type. The problem of small aperiodic current
tripping may occur during single-phase (SPAR) or three-phase
This work was supported by the Russian Scientific Foundation under project
“Development of an intelligent system for preventing large-scale emergencies
in power systems,” Grant No.14-19-00054. Fig. 1. The test system. 500 kV transmission line
cross zero. This feature is evaluated as positive when
XT L disconnecting small inductive currents, because this will
K= (1)
XSRT cause the minimum overvoltages (due to the absence of
where XSRT = XSR /N is the total inductive reactance of current chopping). Sometimes this effect is enhanced by
N reactors, connected to the transmission line; XT L - total means of synchronizers [9]. However, with respect to
capacitive reactance of the transmission line. If K is close to the considered aperiodic current tripping problem, this
1 then the transmission line is close to the resonance. positive characteristic is negative, since it leads to a
Further analysis will be performed using a 500 kV transmis- prolonged arcing. Long arcing leads to the burning of
sion line, presented in Figure 1. Studies were carried out using the contacts, to the overheating of the sulfur hexafluoride
MATLAB/Simulink. In our studies we used the simplified and to the extreme increase of the pressure inside arc
grounded wye connected model of the 160 MVAR shunt re- chute. In the absence of a valve that relieves pressure,
actor with the following parameters [4]: R = 12 M Ω/phase, there is an explosive destruction of the breaker poles
L = 5.3 H/phase, r = 30 Ω/phase, C = 14 nF/phase. with damage of the surrounding equipment. Air circuit
There are two main problems associated with the discon- breaker has a surplus of air under constant pressure; it
nection of compensated lines: the problem of aperiodic current extinguishes the arc with intensity that does not depend
tripping and the problem of resonance overvoltage during on the current strength, without waiting when the current
SPAR. goes through zero.
To solve this problem the following methods can be used:
A. Aperiodic current tripping 1) Application of a synchronization device that controls
This problem is particularly relevant for the modern SF6 the moment when each phase is reclosed close to the
circuit breakers, especially of auto-compression type. It is voltage maximum [10], [11]. However, shunt reactor-
caused by the fact that the tripped currents of a compensated compensated transmission lines present an additional
line do not cross zero for a long time because of the higher complexity on the voltage waveshape across the open
aperiodic component as compared to the periodic one [5], [6]. CB [12], [13], and when 0.7 < K < 1.3, the stan-
The following conditions should be met [7]: dard controlled switching devices may not always be
1) there is at least one unfaulted phase in the compensated efficient [14].
line which is switched on only from one side; 2) Installation of closing resistors that will accelerate the
2) the phase is switched on at the point closer to voltage decay of aperiodic components. This technical solution
zero crossing; is associated with high financial cost [15], [16].
3) the phase is switched off without time delay. 3) Tripping of the reactor (reactors) during TPAR to
Such conditions may occur during unsuccessful TPAR. detune the resonance. This solution is effective from a
Figure 2 shows the transmission line currents in the case of technical viewpoint and has a low price.
two-phase-to-ground fault with unsuccessful TPAR. SR is in Thus, the shutdown of the reactor is the most appropriate
operation during the transient. In the course of reclosing the control action to deal with the problem. Figure 3 again shows
current of the unfaulted phase C does not cross zero for more
than 0.2s, which may result in damages of the circuit breaker.
This problem does not exist, for example, for air circuit
breakers. An analysis carried out by independent experts from
ABB Group [2] and from St. Petersburg [8], shows that the
reasons why tripping of SF6 CB may lead to accident can be
summarized as follows:
1) SF6 CB creates an emergency situation due to the
nature of the switch-on process. The probability of
contact closure for air CB is close to 1 near the voltage
maximum, i.e. the closing results from the air gap
breakdown . In this case the DC component of the
current is minimal. Unlike air CB, the contacts of SF6
breaker can be closed near zero voltage. This leads to a
significant DC component. This behavior is due to high
insulation properties of sulfur hexafluoride.
2) SF6 CB creates an emergency situation due to the
nature of the switch-off process. SF6 CB has closed arc
chutes wherein the intensity of arc extinction depends on
the energy of the arc defined by the breaking current. Fig. 2. Line currents. Two-phase-to-ground fault with unsuccessful
SF6 switch cannot turn off low currents until they TPAR. Without shunt reactor tripping.
the transmission line currents in the case of two-phase-to-
ground fault with unsuccessful TPAR, but this time the reactor
CB is switched off in the dead time.