Criminal Petition No.412/2016

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.412/2016

BETWEEN:

MANJUNATH.D,
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,
S/O DODDAIAH,
R/AT TOVINAKERE (V)
CHANNARAYA DURGA(HOBLI)
KORATAGERE(T)
TUMKUR(D)-572 101.
…PETITIONER

(BY SRI.DEVARAJA.P, ADV.)

AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY PEENYA POLICE,
BANGALORE REPRESENTED
BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, BANGALORE – 560 001.
...RESPONDENT

(BY SRI.B.J.ESHWARAPPA, HCGP)

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C


PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITONER ON BAIL IN
2

CR.NO.935/2015 OF PEENYA P.S., BENGALURU CITY FOR


THE OFFENCE P/U/S 363, 366(A), 376 OF IPC AND SEC.3,
4, 5(1),6 OF POCSO ACT.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,


THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned High Court Government Pleader.

2. Petitioner who is the sole accused in Crime

No.935/2015 on the file of Peenya Police Station, has

approached this Court seeking for regular bail under

Section 439 of Cr.P.C. After conclusion of the

investigation, charge sheet is filed for the offences

punishable under Sections 363, 366(A) and 376 of IPC

and Sections 3, 4, 5(L) and 6 of POSCO Act.

3. Allegation against this petitioner is that he had

abducted the minor girl and had physical contact with

her forcibly.
3

4. Learned Government Pleader has vehemently

opposed the bail application on the ground that prima

facie case is forthcoming for the offence alleged against

this petitioner. Hence the petitioner is not entitled for

grant of bail. Hence, he requests to dismiss the bail

petition.

5. Perused the records and heard the learned

counsel appearing for both the parties.

6. The statement of victim girl recorded under

Section 164 of Cr. P.C on 16.12.2015, discloses that both

of them were loving each other and left the house on

their own volition. It is also forthcoming that the parents

of victim girl had fixed her marriage with another boy

and it was not liked by the said girl and they married in a

temple and were living as husband and wife. In the light

of no serious allegation being made against this

petitioner with regard to abduction or rape in the

statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 164 of


4

Cr.P.C., the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail

under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

7. At this stage, whatever observation made by this

Court is limited purpose for disposing of this petition and

the learned judge will not be influenced by the

observations made in this order, while disposing of the

case on merits. The petitioner is the permanent resident

of Koratagere Taluk. Taking all these facts into

consideration, the apprehension of the learned

Government pleader would be suitably met by imposing

proper conditions. Hence I pass the following:

ORDER

The petition is allowed.

Petitioner shall be enlarged on bail, in Cr.No.

935/2015 of Peenya Police Station, subject to the

following conditions:

1. Petitioner shall be released on bail on his


executing a personal bond for a sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one Lakh only) with a
5

surety, for the like-sum to the satisfaction of


the concerned Court.

2. Petitioner shall not tamper or attempt to


tamper any of the prosecution witness;

3. Petitioner shall not hold out threats to the


prosecution witnesses in any manner.

4. Petitioner shall not involve himself in any


criminal activities.

5. He shall co-operate with the I.O in further


investigation.

6. He shall attend the respondent police


station once in a month on every Sunday
between 9.00 am and 5.00 p.m till the
disposal of the case.

7. It is made clear that if the petitioner does


not comply with any one of the conditions
imposed on him, the prosecution is at liberty to
seek cancellation of the bail.

Ordered accordingly.

Sd/-
JUDGE
ra

You might also like