The City
The City
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Economic and Political Weekly.
http://www.jstor.org
Indian writers in English should not be seen in a privileged relationship to regional language writers; nor is the
relationshiponzeof competition.Thereis space and validityforbothkindsof experience. If culture is to be trulypluralistic
and if Bombay is to epitomise that plurality, then writers in English have a legitimate right to 'appropriate' the city.
The question is not one of territorial rights.
'Country' and 'City' are very powerful Indianness-rusticity-simplicity nexus. With even while it accentuatesa terrifyingsense
words, and this is not surprisingwhen we the needto explain 'our' ways, 'our'culture, of anonymity among its inhabitants and
rememberhow muchthey seem to standfor 'our' traditionsboth to ourselves and to the which manyof the 'Bombaywriters'portray
in the experienceof humancommunities... westernworld,ruralIndiaseemed to appear in their fiction - could give to such writers
powerful feelings have been generalised. moretruly 'ours' and moretrulyIndianthan themselves an anonymity and amorphous-
On the countryhas gatheredthe idea of a the already 'westernised'metropolitancity. ness that is desirable because it permits a
naturalway of life: of peace,innocenceand We tend to carrythat notion with us still, sense of freedom and privacy. Because the
simple virtue.On the city has gatheredthe long after the era of flag-waving city has a plural character,it can provide a
idea of an achieved centre: of learning, independence. As recently as a couple of vantage point for writers to liberate
communicationand light. Powerfulhostile years ago. a reputed critic stated very themselves from an essentialist view of the
associationshave also developed: on the nation. The!city brings the writer close to
categoricallythatthe authenticIndiannovel
city as a place of noise, worldlinessand
in English hadyet to be writtenfor no writer power-structureswhich can supply them
ambition; on the country as a place of
backwardness,ignorance,limitation. to date had written successfully about our with the site andfocus of theirinterrogation.
- Raymond Williams sons-of-the-soil.Theremightbe partialtruth. Admittedly,as will be explored later, such
althoughunintended,in the latterhalf of the an urban writer, often a transculturalone,
IN the earlier stages of Indian writing in statement,in the sense that the tendency to is likely to face the not altogetherunjustified
English, there was a propensity among pictorialiseand romanticisethe Indianrural chargeof elitism, of being out of touch with
wiiters of fiction to set the rural-urban scene by Indiannovelists in English, has led grass roots realities.
milieu in binaryopposition,withassociations to a certaininauthenticity.However, onc is
of simplicityinnocence and peace gathering not so readilyconvincedby the authoritative IMAGININGBOMBAYTHROUGHENGLISH
around country life and those of chaos, assertion that the authenticIndiannovel in
corruptionandevil aroundthe urbanethos. English is waiting to be written.In fact, the The choice of the English language. like
The son-of-the-soil syndrome and/or the Indiancity is as 'representative'of Indiaas the choice of the urban locale, becomes
earth-motherfigurearecommonly featured is the Indian village, although the writer inevitable for these writers.Undoubtedly,it
in this kind of writing. Even when socio- needs to grapplewith a totally different set is the languageof a minusculeminorityand
political realities are conf'ronted, they of realities and, of course, the tendency to a colonial legacy to boot. It is, however, tfie
appear filtered-through a middle-class romanticisethe city can be an equal danger. only tool available to them and one which
consciousness. Although socially relevant This paper does not wish to valorise the they are exploiting to advantage, in order
issues like untouchability, rural poverty, 'city-bred'novel as againstits 'countrified' to capture a particular aspect of Indian
class, caste or genderoppression,are raised, counterpart.They havebeenjuxtaposedonly reality- its urbancosmopolitanism.Bombay
they are often domesticised, sanitised and to emphasise thatthe last couple of decades as a metropoliscould be seen to characterise
finally dissolved and diffused in a romantic have produced important city-centred this composite quality despite its recent,
blurringof focus. Earlyexamples like Mulk writing,muchof it set in metropolitancities very ingloriouspast.Moreover,unlikeother
Raj Anand's TlheUntouchable,Raja Rao's like Bombay. The Bombayite's existence major cities of India, such as Calcutta or
Kanthapura, seminal works in their own can be,as trulycharacteristicof Indiaas the Madras, Bombay's very mixed population
right, come to mind, as do more recent country-dweller's;to go a step further,one has furtherentrenched the use of English,
exampleslike KamalaMarkandaya's Nectair canarguethatthecomplexrangeandplurality notonly as a culturaltool. butas aneveryday
in the Sieve. In the years preceding ol this city's culture make it even more functional means of communication,
independence and in the euphoric decade representativeof the complex pluralityof especially among the middle classes who
that followed, as the young nation was India,althoughone is a little scepticalabout form the bulk of the reading public. The
consolidatingitself,theneedfor'Indianiness'. using this word 'representative'in the first English languagebecomes a handicapwhen
of tradition, found expression through a place.The ideaof pluralityhasgainedground the writer employs it to delineate a rural
valorisationof the Indianpeasantandof the even as the idea of nation and nationhood experienceandhenceRajaRao's exasperated
Indian ruralscape.Not surprisingly,as the is problematised;the writer,we have come cry - 'the telling has not been easy. One has
editorsof WomenWritingin Indiapointout, to think,needspluralkindsof representations to convey in a languagethatis notone's own
thecinemabox-office hit,MotherInlia, was to convey the larger experience. the spirit that is one's own' (Foreword,
made at the peak of this national fervour. When Indianwritersin Englishchoose an Kanthapura).Hisdilemmacanbe understood
In this film the Mother f'igure and the urban locale. they write with a relatively in the context of its time, 1937, in view of
Motherland are venerated, idealised and greatersense of ease andcontidence forthey the novel's rurallocale and of its narrative
invested with powerful symbolic value. In are dealing with a sphere familiarto them. voice - thatof an old village woman. In the
literatureas well as in the visual media, one and working within the modalities they 1980s and 1990s, however, and with the
sought, and very readily discovered, the understandbest.Thecity's amorphousness- younger writers' increasing interest in