The document provides criteria for evaluating a vlog assignment on several dimensions: content, format, depth of reflection, meeting criteria, and communication. Based on the criteria, the vlog would receive an "Excellent" rating in most areas. It contained an overview of what was learned, citations, examples, and explanations of future uses. Theories from class were used appropriately. The vlog had an effective introduction, body, conclusion, and transitions. It showed clear personal reflection and critical thinking by relating readings to what was learned. The assignment met all technical and time requirements and showed excellent communication skills.
The document provides criteria for evaluating a vlog assignment on several dimensions: content, format, depth of reflection, meeting criteria, and communication. Based on the criteria, the vlog would receive an "Excellent" rating in most areas. It contained an overview of what was learned, citations, examples, and explanations of future uses. Theories from class were used appropriately. The vlog had an effective introduction, body, conclusion, and transitions. It showed clear personal reflection and critical thinking by relating readings to what was learned. The assignment met all technical and time requirements and showed excellent communication skills.
The document provides criteria for evaluating a vlog assignment on several dimensions: content, format, depth of reflection, meeting criteria, and communication. Based on the criteria, the vlog would receive an "Excellent" rating in most areas. It contained an overview of what was learned, citations, examples, and explanations of future uses. Theories from class were used appropriately. The vlog had an effective introduction, body, conclusion, and transitions. It showed clear personal reflection and critical thinking by relating readings to what was learned. The assignment met all technical and time requirements and showed excellent communication skills.
The document provides criteria for evaluating a vlog assignment on several dimensions: content, format, depth of reflection, meeting criteria, and communication. Based on the criteria, the vlog would receive an "Excellent" rating in most areas. It contained an overview of what was learned, citations, examples, and explanations of future uses. Theories from class were used appropriately. The vlog had an effective introduction, body, conclusion, and transitions. It showed clear personal reflection and critical thinking by relating readings to what was learned. The assignment met all technical and time requirements and showed excellent communication skills.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
CRITERIONS 7 5 3 2
CONTENT Excellent Good Fair Poor
The vlog contains an overview of The vlog contains part of an The vlog contains a minimal The vlog had no overview of what what was learned this semester. overview of what was learned this overview of what was learned was learned and did not contain Citations and examples were semester. Citations and examples this semester. Citations and models or theories. Significant included as needed. Future uses of were limited. Theories from class examples were not included as work is needed to improve. information were explained. Theories were used if relevant. needed. from class were used if relevant.
CONTENT OF FORMAT Excellent Good Fair Poor
The vlog contained an effective The vlog contains part of an Introduction, body, and Significant improvement needed. introduction, body, conclusion and overview of what was learned this conclusion were ineffective and Vlog was missing the majority of transitions that adhered to generally semester. Citations and examples transitions were limited or this information altogether. accepted principals of online identity, were limited. Theories from class missing entirely. vlogging and social media. were used if relevant.
DEEP OF REFLECTION Excellent Good Fair Poor
Clearly ties personal knowledge into The introduction, body and Little personal reflection given. No personal reaction given. Did the reflection. Draws the relationship conclusion were somewhat Shows some evidence of not relate information to what between readings and shows critical apparent but did not effectively reasoned reflection. Provides he/she learned. Did not support thinking. Clear evidence of reasoned demonstrate public address theory. some support for claims. Very any claims, or show critical reflection and depth. Provides Transitions were lacking. little critical thinking. Too many thinking. Too many video clips excellent support for claims. video clips are shown to are shown to emphasize the emphasize the vloggers point, to vloggers point, to that their own that their own thoughts are thoughts are overshadowed. overshadowed.
CRITERIA Excellent Good Fair Poor
Assignment met time limit; was Good personal reflection with Assignment didn't meet time limit Assignment failed to meet most submitted at designated time; was reasoning and insight. Support for and/or was submitted late; was criteria provided, was poor and in edited as appropriate; included claims is evident. Good use of not edited as appropriate; need of great improvement. images if needed was professional; critical thinking. included no images if needed; adhered to best practices of was unprofessional; adhered to vlogging. few of the best practices of vlogging.
COMMUNICATION Excellent Good Fair Poor
Excellent communication skills. Good communication skills. Student Verbal and nonverbal Communication skills, verbal and Student uses verbal and nonverbal uses verbal and nonverbal communication skills are weak nonverbal messages along with communication and messaging communication somewhat and interaction with camera is camera interaction are poor. effectively. Communication skills and effectively. Communication skills ineffective. interaction with camera are very and interaction with camera are strong. good.