Chapter-8: Ayushman Bharat's Jan Arogya Yojana (JAY) and Health Outcome 1. Theme

Chapter-8: Ayushman Bharat’s Jan Arogya Yojana (JAY) and Health Outcome
1. Theme
 Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY) was launched by GoI in 2018 to provide healthcare
access to the most vulnerable sections. This chapter demonstrates strong positive effects on
healthcare outcomes of PM-JAY.
2. Summary
 As PM-JAY was implemented in 2018, health indicators measured by National Family Health Surveys
4 (in 2015-16) and 5 (in 2019-20) provide before-after data to assess this impact.
 Benefits accrued to states that implemented PM-JAY:
o Proportion of households with health insurance: Across all the states, the proportion of
households with health insurance increased by 54% for the states that implemented PM-JAY
while falling by 10% in states that did not.
o Infant mortality rates: From 2015-16 to 2019-20, infant mortality rates declined by 12% for
states that did not adopt PM-JAY and by 20% for the states that adopted it.
o Under-5 mortality rate: States that did not adopt PM-JAY saw a fall of 14% in its Under-5
mortality rate, the states that adopted it witnessed a 19% reduction.
o Unmet family planning needs: States that did not adopt PM-JAY witness 15% decline in unmet
need for spacing between consecutive kids, the states that adopted it recorded a 31% fall.
 Conclusion:
o While some of these effects stemmed directly from enhanced care enabled by insurance
coverage, others represent spillover effects due to the same.
o Overall, finding reflects significant improvements in several health outcomes in states that
implemented PM-JAY versus those that did not.
3. INTRODUCTION
 As healthcare represents a critical public good, successive governments have committed
to achieve universal health coverage (UHC).
o In 2018, GoI approved Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PM-JAY) as a
step towards providing healthcare access to the most vulnerable sections in the country. The
evidence suggests strong positive effects of PM-JAY on healthcare outcomes:
3.1 PM-JAY: STATUS AND PROGRESS SO FAR

 As per the latest annual report of PM-JAY released by the National Health Authority (NHA, 2019),
the status of implementation is as follows:
o 32 states and UTs implement the scheme
o 13.48 crore E-cards have been issued
o Treatments worth INR 7,490 crore have been provided (1.55 crores hospital admission)
o 24,215 hospitals empaneled
o 1.5 crore users have registered on the scheme’s website
 The highest number of pre-authorization claims received were for procedures that cost in the range
of INR 10,000-15,000. The distribution is heavily right tailed (see below figure) indicating relatively
fewer claims for more expensive procedures  higher claims for low cost procedures could be
indicative of people utilizing PM-JAY as a delivery channel for primary healthcare services
3.2 PUBLIC GOODS, DEMOCRACIES AND GOVERNANCE
 Samuelson argued that “no decentralized pricing system can serve to optimally determine the levels
of collective consumption of the public good.”
o As public goods are non-rival and non-excludable, market failures predominate in provision of
such goods  public goods may get severely under-produced without state intervention
 The presence of strong linkages between public goods provision and economic development
accentuates the need for the provision of public good at national, regional and international levels.
 Despite the importance of the delivery of public goods, governments may suffer from the “horizon
problem” in democracies. The horizon problem refers to the tendency of political leaders to make
promises keeping in mind the electoral cycle whereas benefits of most public goods may take longer
than electoral cycle to reach the electorate.
o As a result of horizon problem, many democratically elected governments focus only on short-
term gains rather than commit to long-term projects, therefore, lead to under-provisioning of
public goods by governments.
o In summary, provision of public goods that generate long-term gains to the economy and the
society represents a key aspect of governance in a democratic polity.
3.3 PM-JAY AND COVID-19

 Use of dialysis did not decrease during lockdown: Dialysis is a common procedure availed under
PM-JAY. Its use did not diminish at the onset of CoVID-19 or during the lockdown (March-April
2020). This highlights the users’ reliance on PMJAY for the life-saving dialysis procedure.
 Care-seeking exhibited a V-shaped behaviour: While access to medical services were classified as
essential services during the lockdown, care-seeking exhibited a V-shaped behaviour during the
lockdown and unlock phases with pre-CoVID-19 levels being reached in December 2020.
3.4 PM-JAY AND HEALTH OUTCOMES

 To understand this relationship, survey compares the health indicators measured by NFHS-4 (2015-
16) and NFHS-5 (2019-20). This comparison has been undertaken in two parts.
o In the first part, the health indicators of west Bengal (state that did not implement PM-JAY) are
compared to its neighbouring states that have implemented PM-JAY – Bihar, Sikkim and Assam.
o In the second part, the process is repeated for all states that did not implement PMJAY vis-à-vis
all states that implemented PM-JAY.
 Comparing West Bengal versus its neighbours (Bihar, Sikkim, Assam):
o Sex ratio at birth: From NHFS 4 to NFHS 5, West Bengal’s sex ratio at birth improved by 1.35%
while the corresponding improvement for the three neighbours was 6.28%.
o Proportion of population with health insurance: The proportion increased from NHFS 4 to NFHS
5 in Bihar, Assam and Sikkim by 89%. The corresponding change in West Bengal was -12%.
o Infant mortality rate: While infant mortality rates declined by 20% for West Bengal, the decline
for the three neighbours was higher at 28%. Similarly, while Bengal saw a fall of 20 per cent in its
o Under-5 mortality rate: While Bengal saw a fall of 20% while the neighbours witnessed a 27%
reduction.
o Family planning methods: Modern methods of contraception went up by 36%, female
sterilization is up by 22%, use of condoms by 104% in 3 neighbouring states while the respective
figures for West Bengal were 6%, ~0% and only 19%.
o Women receiving postnatal care: The proportion of women who received postnatal care from
health care personnel within two days of delivery in three neighbouring states with PM-JAY
witnessed slightly higher utilisation of maternal and child care services at 13% when compared
to West Bengal at 11%.
o Child vaccinations: PM-JAY in Bihar, Sikkim and Assam facilitated notable progress in health
outcomes pertaining to child vaccinations. Though improvement happened in all four states, the
magnitude was greater in Bihar, Sikkim and Assam.
o Spread of awareness about HIV/AIDS: While the proportion of women who have
comprehensive knowledge of HIV/AIDS increased significantly in the three neighbouring states,
the proportion declined by 1% in West Bengal.
 Comparing all States that adopted PM-JAY versus those that did not:
o Proportion of households with health insurance coverage: While the proportion of households
with health insurance coverage increased by 54% from NFHS 4 to NFHS 5 in the states that
adopted PM-JAY, it decreased by 10% in the states that did not adopt PM-JAY, reflecting the
success of PM-JAY in enhancing health insurance coverage.
o Neonatal mortality rate: Neonatal mortality rate (NNMR) declined by 22% in the states that
adopted PM-JAY in comparison to a 16% decline in states that did not adopt PM-JAY.
o Infant mortality rate: The reduction in IMR was 20% vis-à-vis 12% in PM-JAY and non-PM-JAY
states respectively.
o Under-five mortality rate: While the U5MR recorded a decline of 19% in PMJAY states, it
reduced by 14% in non-PM-JAY states.
o Family planning measures: While the proportion of people ensuring family planning rose across
all the states between the two surveys, the increase is much more significant in the states that
adopted PM-JAY indicating its effectiveness.
o Maternal and child health: The percentage of mothers who received post-natal care within two
days of delivery increased by 15% in PM-JAY states vis-à-vis an increase of only 9% in non-PM-
JAY states.
o Vaccination of the child: Health outcomes pertaining to the vaccination of the child improved
remarkably in the states which adopted the PM-JAY as compared to the states which did not
adopt the PM-JAY.
o Spread of awareness regarding HIV/AIDS: The percentage of women who have comprehensive
knowledge of HIV/AIDS increased remarkably by 13% in PM-JAY states, vis-à-vis an increase of
mere 2% in non-PM-JAY states. The difference for men is even starker.
CONCLUSION
 The health outcomes of the states that adopted PM-JAY improved when compared to the states that
did not adopt it. While some of these effects stemmed directly from enhanced care enabled by
insurance coverage, others represent spillover effects due to the same.

Chapter-8: Ayushman Bharat's Jan Arogya Yojana (JAY) and Health Outcome 1. Theme

Uploaded by

Chapter-8: Ayushman Bharat's Jan Arogya Yojana (JAY) and Health Outcome 1. Theme

Uploaded by

Chapter-8: Ayushman Bharat’s Jan Arogya Yojana (JAY) and Health Outcome

3.1 PM-JAY: STATUS AND PROGRESS SO FAR

3.3 PM-JAY AND COVID-19

3.4 PM-JAY AND HEALTH OUTCOMES

You might also like