The New Doctrine To Code Switching

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

NEW DOCTORINE OF CODE

SWITCHING

Done by: Bouayadi abdel monhim


  
The new doctrine to code switching

Code switching is linguistic phenomenon that is defined basically as the


alternation between two or more languages in the same conversation. This
phenomenon is the result of language contact another linguistic phenomenon
that is the main subject of study of contact linguistics. Contact linguistics as a
field of linguistics have made many attempts to study code switching from a
grammatical side, and many scholars tried to define and categorize the
phenomenon but it seemed that it is more complex than the scholars’
traditional approaches to try to clarify it. This has led to the emergence of new
approaches, models and typologies that are more flexible and adaptive to the
complexity of the phenomenon, in what is known in linguistics and especially
contact linguistics as the new doctrine to code switching.

The variationist approach:


Also known as the Constraint-based model is a model that considers code
switching as a linguistic variable that should be observed to identify and catch
the regular patterns that keeps recurring over and over, and these patterns
should reflect natural exchanges among speakers. The approach was put
forward by Shana Poplack and posits that there are two constraints that are
implemented when code switching occurs and which are the equivalence
constraint and the free morpheme constraint. The equivalence constraint tells
us that in order for code switching to occur the speaker should respect the
syntactic grammatical rules of both the languages he uses in the conversation.
i.e., if a language, such as English, has an s v o structure, we can’t put o v s in it
as Spanish in the sentence because this will violate the equivalence constraint.
The free morpheme constraint states that code switching can precede after any
morphological constituent except for a bound morpheme.
The matrix language frame model:
Proposed by Carol Myers-Scotton, the matrix language model sheds the light
on the inherent asymmetry of bilingualism, this means that most of the time
the bilingual speaker always master one language more than the other and
uses one language more than the other starting from this principle this model
proposes that when we code switch, we tend to use one language the
dominant one called the matrix language and we insert a part from the other
language which is considered less dominant and named as the embedded
language.
The matrix language is recognized and identified by its contribution with large
proportions to the morphemes count, in a simpler way it has more morphemes
than the embedded language. It is also the likely language between the two
that can contribute by system morphemes.ie., function words.
In order for code switching to occur the embedded language should follow
some rules, or to achieve congruency with the matrix language those rules are
the following:
The content morphemes of the embedded language should not belong to the
system morphemes of the matrix morphemes.
The content morphemes of the embedded language should respect the theta
roles (agent, patient etc.…) of its counterpart in the matrix language.
The content morphemes of the embedded language should respect the
pragmatic function of matrix language content morphemes.
The matrix language frame model is also considered as a constraint-based
model.
The Generativist minimalist program
Pioneered by Jeff Macswan, this approach is a constraint free approach that
implements the chompskiyan minimalist program in the study of code
switching.
The minimalist program is a chompskian framework that seeks to simplify and
give an economic version that contains only the necessary properties of the
generative syntax and, generative grammar that is considered so complicated.
This simplification is based on restricting derivation principles and parameters.
This program when applied to code switching, it denies all the previous
constraints of code switching suggested by the other scholars and states that
when people code switch, they only have to respect the grammatical rules of
both the languages, in other words the grammatical rules of code switching are
the union of the grammatical rules of its languages which draws boundaries on
the correct use of code switching.

You might also like