Pamantasan NG Lungsod NG Marikina
Pamantasan NG Lungsod NG Marikina
2019-2020
STEM – 201
Bea, Vincent
Priego, Jeffrey
Elizaga, Melanie
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The proponents would like to express their deepest appreciation to all the
people who made this study possible. Without their help and guidance, the research
First of all, to Almighty God, for giving the researchers strength and hope to
conduct this study, for them not to give up, and guiding them all throughout the study.
To Mr. Erico Habijan, the university president and SHS principal for
To Ms. Noime Calma, the Research II instructor for giving inspiration and
To Mr. Vince Carlo Tan, the research adviser and statistician for his guidance
To Mr. John Rhex Sandagon and Ms. Rachel Joy Gundayao for sharing
To all the researchers’ subject teachers, for allowing the proponents to use
Table of Contents
Title……………………………………………………………………….1
Acknowledgement………………………………………………………..2
Abstract…………………………………………………………………...4
CHAPTER I
Background of the Study………………………………………………...5
Review of Related Literature……………………………………………11
Review of Related Studies……………………………………………….21
Theoretical Framework………………………………………………….31
Conceptual Framework………………………………………………….33
Statement of the Problem………………………………………………..34
Hypotheses………………………………………………………………..35
Significance of the Study…………………………………………………35
Scope and Delimitations of the Study…………………………………...36
Definition of Terms……………………………………………………….37
CHAPTER II
Research Design…………………………………………………………..38
Sampling Design…………………………………………………………..39
Research Respondents……………………………………………………39
Research Instrument……………………………………………………..39
CHAPTER III
Tables and Interpretations………………………………………………..42
CHAPTER IX
Summary and Discussion…………………………………………………47
Conclusion………………………………………………………………….48
Recommendations………………………………………………………….49
Bibliography………………………………………………………………..51
Appendices………………………………………………………………….56
ABSTRACT
causing over 6 million deaths each year and is expected to cause over 8 million deaths
yearly by 2030. Also, there are recent findings about the other effects of smoking in
terms of mental and even psychological health. The researchers conducted the study to
potentially help the community, the young adults specifically by studying the
conducting this study, the results will serve as proof of the dangerous effects of
smoking, and therefore raise the awareness hoping to lessen the number of smokers
distributed to the 300 grade 12 n order to gather data. The survey questionnaire
contains 3 sections: the first contains questions about the demographic profile, the
second contains a likert scale, and the last one is a mathematical 7 item quiz. The
collected data was analyzed and computed. The study showed that the number of non-
smokers is greater than the number of smokers. The findings also showed that there is
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
This chapter contains the background of the study, review of related literature,
the problem, hypotheses, significance of the study, scope and delimitations of the
presently causing over 6 million deaths each year and is expected to cause over 8
million deaths yearly by 2030. Unless current trends change, the vast majority of these
deaths are projected to occur in the developing world. An efficient and systematic
aims to reduce the global burden of disease and death caused by tobacco, thereby
protecting present and future generations from the devastating health, social,
promoting the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and the
MPOWER package of tobacco policies as a key entry point to the FCTC. MPOWER
includes the following policies: Monitor tobacco use and prevention policies; Protect
people from tobacco smoke; Offer help to quit tobacco use; Warn about the
and Raise taxes on tobacco. The FCTC encourages countries to adhere to its
principles, and WHO supports countries in their efforts to implement provisions of the
Tobacco smoking hardly affects the human health, but research shows that
smoking also affects the intellectual performance of the user. According to University
of Michigan Health System (2015), Smokers often say that smoking a cigarette helps
them concentrate and feel more alert. But years of tobacco use may have the opposite
effect, dimming the speed and accuracy of a person's thinking ability and bringing
down their IQ, according to a new study led by University of Michigan researchers.
The study showed that smoking affected the user’s IQ or intelligence quotient.
Thus, can affect the student smokers’ capability to learn during school time.
particularly tobacco taxation has led to a significant drop in current smokers from 17
million (2009) to 15.9 million (2015). The Tobacco Tax Reform Law of 2012 is also
called an “anti-cancer tax” that has a significant health outcome and has increased
funds available for health. This figure represents a relative reduction of close to 20%
of smokers or in simpler terms, one million Filipinos have quit tobacco use --- the
biggest decline we have seen in Philippine history, and we can do more to stop the
suffering caused by this epidemic. Other measures that have contributed to the decline
in smoking are graphic health warnings, local ordinances and advocacy of the
The issue of smoking has been addressed by the Philippine government and
attains successful solutions to lessen the number of smokers generally. But the number
Based on the study led by WHO (2014), MORE than one in every eight
Filipino aged 13–15 years old have been found to be puffing tobacco products,
according to the Youth and Tobacco in the Western Pacific Region: Global Youth
Tobacco Survey (GYTS) 2005-2014 report of the World Health Organization (WHO).
According to the latest GYTS report of the WHO Western Pacific Regional Office
(WPRO), 13.7 percent of those aged 13 to 15 years old in the Philippines are using
tobacco products. This makes the Philippines rank 15th among the highest out of the
The numbers given by WHO are still alarming, 13.7 % of Filipinos aging from
13-15 are using tobacco products. Philippines has a law that only 18 years old and
above are allowed to use tobacco and nicotine products. And smoking cigarettes not
only affects the physical health but also the capacity of the user to think based on the
continuous usage of cigarettes can result to depletion of IQ, given that a huge number
of students are using cigarettes in the Philippines, and that can cause their IQ to lower
Poor academic performance is a known risk factor for adolescent smoking, yet
the association remains unclear, as the role of social ties has been rarely examined.
Our study aims to investigate the role of friendship ties in this association. In a sample
of 11,015 adolescents, aged 14 to17, in 50 schools within six European cities (SILNE-
survey, 2013), we used multilevel models to analyze the mediating effect of the
composition of friendship ties and school types on the association between academic
performance and smoking. Results show smoking was more prevalent in adolescents
with lower academic performance than with higher. This association was stronger in
with someone sharing the same smoking status and academic performance. Finally,
friendship networks are patterned both on smoking and academic performance. This
Various studies have been conducted on how smoking affects the academic
performance of adults and students. The researches showed that smoking can really
affect the physical health of the user, as well as the individuals who inhale the smoke
or known as second/ third hand smokers, and some researches also concluded that
smoking also affects the intellect of the users, particularly the student smokers.
The researchers aim to conduct a study that focuses on how cigarette smoking
can affect the mathematical ability as it plays a major role as an individual by using
difference between the mathematical ability of students who smoke and to those not.
This research will open a new course of study to further discern the effects of
smoking, especially the mental effects related to the intellect. The researchers aim to
open the eyes of the public, particularly to the students to stop smoking, by showing
FOREIGN
effects on the body. Some of these can lead to life-threatening complications. In fact,
according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), smoking
cigarettes increases the risk of dying from all causes, not just those linked to tobacco
use. Smoking cigarettes affects lung health because a person breathes in not only
nicotine but also a variety of additional chemicals. Cigarettes are responsible for a
substantial increase in the risk of developing lung cancer. This risk is 25 times greater
for men and 25.7 times greater for women. Smoking cigarettes also presents a greater
risk of developing and dying from chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). In
fact, the American Lung Association report that smoking causes 80 percent of COPD
deaths. Cigarettes are also linked to developing emphysema and chronic bronchitis.
They can also trigger or exacerbate an asthma attack. Smoking cigarettes can
damage the heart, blood vessels, and blood cells. The chemicals and tar in cigarettes
can increase a person's risk of atherosclerosis, which is the buildup of plaque in the
blood vessels. This buildup limits blood flow and can lead to dangerous blockages.
Smoking also increases the risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD), which occurs
when the arteries to the arms and legs start to narrow, restricting blood flow. Research
shows a direct link between smoking and developing PAD. Even those who used to
The research above showed that smoking greatly harms the human
body, not just the smoker but also the individuals who inhales the smoke from the
damage epithelial cells in the respiratory system by stressing cells and causing them to
fight for survival, a research team led by scientists at the University of California,
Riverside, has found. The finding could assist physicians treating patients exposed to
thirdhand smoke. "Our data show that cells in humans are affected by thirdhand
smoke," said Prue Talbot, a professor in the Department of Molecular, Cell and
Systems Biology, who led the research. "The health effects of THS, have been studied
in cultured cells and animal models, but this is the first study to show a direct effect of
Network Open. Thirdhand smoke, or THS, results when exhaled smoke and smoke
clothing, hair, furniture, and cars. Not strictly smoke, THS refers to the residues left
behind by smoking. "THS can resurface into the atmosphere and can be inhaled
unwillingly by nonsmokers," said Giovanna Pozuelos, the first author of the research
paper and a graduate student in Talbot's lab. "It has not been widely studied, which
may explain why no regulations are in place to protect nonsmokers from it. "The
researchers obtained nasal scrapes from four healthy nonsmokers who had been
exposed to THS for three hours in a laboratory setting at UC San Francisco. The UCR
researchers then worked to get good quality RNA from the scrapes -- necessary to
examine gene expression changes. RNA sequencing identified genes that were over-
other genes were under-expressed. They then identified pathways affected by these
genes. "THS inhalation for only three hours significantly altered gene expression in
the nasal epithelium of healthy nonsmokers," Pozuelos said. "The inhalation altered
pathways associated with oxidative stress, which can damage DNA, with cancer being
would cause cancer, but if someone lived in an apartment or home with THS or drove
a car regularly where THS was present, there could be health consequences."
From the research of American Chemical Society (2019). Along with many
oxidative stress and inflammation in the brain. Excessive alcohol use can have similar
effects. Surprisingly, however, very few studies have examined the combined impact
of smoking and alcohol on the brain. Now, researchers reporting in ACS Chemical
Neuroscience have shown that in rats, the joint use of tobacco and alcohol could
increase neural damage in particular brain regions. According to the National Institute
on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, many people who smoke tobacco also drink
alcohol excessively, and vice versa. Therefore, studying the combined effects of the
two drugs on the central nervous system could yield valuable insights. But most
previous studies have examined the consequences of one or the other in isolation.
That's why Alana Hansen and colleagues wanted to find out how drinking and
smoking together affect regions of the rat brain involved in drug addiction. The
researchers treated rats with alcohol, tobacco smoke or both twice a day for 28 days
and then compared their brains with control animals that didn't receive either
substance. They found that the combined alcohol and smoking treatment increased the
level of reactive oxygen species in the hippocampus compared with control animals or
rats given tobacco smoke alone. In all of the brain areas studied, combined alcohol and
smoking increased the levels of specific pro-inflammatory cytokines more than either
treatment alone. And in the striatum and frontal cortex, rats with both treatments
showed lower levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, a growth factor that helps
existing neurons survive and stimulates the growth of new ones. These results suggest
that alcoholics who smoke could be at additional risk for neural damage, the
researchers say.
The research of ACS focused on the effect of smoking to the brain, they stated
that the effect of smoking to the human brain is similar to what alcohol does to the
brain, the human brain is very sensitive and thus, quickly reacts to the harmful foreign
substances such as the substances imbued by cigarettes and alcohol. The researchers of
ACS concluded that smokers that are also alcoholics are at very high risk for brain
related disease and can be related to the intellectual damages done by smoking.
Looking into the statistics further, tobacco kills up to half of its users within a
lifetime. The addictive culprit of cigarettes is nicotine. Researchers are hard at work to
further understand how nicotine affects cells from the inside out, shedding light on
nicotine addiction. Every time you take a puff from a cigarette, nicotine races into the
brain attaching itself to neurons creating those feelings of happiness and calmness that
are associated with smoking a cigarette. For the uninitiated, the neurons are the cells
responsible for receiving sensory input from the external world, for sending motor
commands to our muscles, and for transforming and relaying the electrical signals at
every step in between. Nicotine alters these “brain-sensors”, very literally changing
them from the inside of brain. Not much is well understood about the effects of
nicotine on the brain in the research community. Using a biosensor, the research team
was able to visualize the effects of nicotine as it floods the cells. (Alexander,2019)
nicotine, they came into conclusion with the help of a certain type of a protein that
they have developed successfully that serves a sensor. The sensor glows as the
nicotine affects the brain activity. They also concluded that smoking really affects the
brain. Furthermore, it can be concluded that smoking can affect the brain productivity
The part of the brain that's responsible for decision making and impulse control
is not yet fully developed during adolescence. Young people are more likely to take
risks with their health and safety, including use of nicotine and other drugs. Youth and
young adults are also uniquely at risk for long-term, long-lasting effects of exposing
their developing brains to nicotine. These risks include nicotine addiction, mood
disorders, and permanent lowering of impulse control. Nicotine also changes the way
synapses are formed, which can harm the parts of the brain that control attention and
learning. (e-cigarettes.surgeongeneral.gov)
The articles showed correlation about the effect of smoking to the human
and nervous system. Focusing on the brain, the articles stated that nicotine targets the
brain affecting how the individual thinks, reacts, and even impulses.
LOCAL
it in all public places throughout the country. It is so common an issue that everybody
has come to understand the word “smoking” to mean “smoking tobacco.” Smoking is
a major public health concern, posing health risks not only for the smokers themselves
but also for others around when the smokers smoke. Smoking, thus, has become a
completely negative idea, act or habit. Most people, including the smokers themselves,
would attest that it is a bad thing. Curiously, while smoking is generally perceived to
be a bad thing, many people continue to fall into the habit. The effects of tobacco
smoke on people’s health are dreadful. The medical establishment has long proven
that smoking causes lung cancer, among many other serious ailments. More and more
governments all over the world are responding by banning smoking in public places.
(philstar.com)
According to St. Lukes Medical Center (2017), The effects of smoking are
legion. Smoking is dangerous because it has effects on the respiratory system and
cardiovascular system. One of the most dreaded effects of smoking is lung cancer.
Unfortunately, the effects of smoking are seen not only among smokers, but also in the
people around them. Smoking is dangerous because smoke contains more than four
thousand poisonous substances which cause various diseases, even death. Among
these are cancer-producing substances, carbon monoxide, nicotine, and other irritating
substances.
The research done by Aro (2017) states that, the cigarette contains 7,000
chemicals which are toxic when ingested by children and eaten by mistake among
household pets and animals including fish and other marine life. The sight of
cigarettes and packages disappearing into a storm and drain may ease the guilt of a
litterer but those often find their way into bodies of water, and subsequently, the
stomachs of marine wildlife. The cigarette butt, the most littered worldwide, is non-
biodegradable composed of cellulose acetate, a plastic that may disperse into smaller
pieces. It said that smoking releases about 2.6 billion kilograms of carbon dioxide in
the air worldwide every year which is not good for the health. It also releases about
The researches from St. Lukes MC, philstar.com, and Aro shows that smoking
heavily affects the health of the user. The smoke from cigarettes contain thousands of
using e-cigarettes, its health risks cannot be set aside. The precautionary principle
recommends that, until conclusive data regarding their safety have been established,
According to the DOH, the number of local e-cigarettes consumers will increase as the
global market for these devices expand. E-cigarettes or vapes are combinations of non-
aerosol, mist, or vapor that users inhale by mimicking the act of smoking. "In 2015,
the Global Adult Tobacco Survey recorded that the overall prevalence of ever users
and current users of e-cigarettes in the Philippines was 2.8 percent and 0.8 percent,
respectively," the DOH said. The DOH stressed that the composite contents of and
emissions from these devices are not completely without harm as they use chemicals
such as nicotine, ultra-fine particles, carcinogens, heavy metals, and volatile organic
The article of Duque (2018) states that, smoking causes health implications,
especially to blood flow within the body. “Tobacco smoke thickens the blood,
increases the risk of blood clots, narrows the arteries and restricts oxygen in the
blood,” he explained.
All the researches and articles agreed that smoking is harmful to human body,
given that it is treated as a major concern, its effect to the community is devastating by
destroying the body of the user, as well as the second and third hand smokers by
slowly interrupting the major organ systems due to the deterioration of organs such as
FOREIGN
From the research of Edo (2014), the concept of tobacco and the effect as well
as misuse was looked into. The study was aimed at finding out how parent, family
smoking problems among students, with special focus on drugs like cigarettes,
alcohol, coffee, kola nut shows that some students of college of education ekiadolor
smokes. The investigation also show that tobacco smoking induce memory loss and
alters behaviour. It was also discovered that tobacco usage affects academic
performance
and causes loss of ambition. Therefore, the work recommends proper educational
the imposition of some levies to restrict the production of tobacco. It also recommends
that the mass media should month heavy campaign against tobacco and also calls for
The research shows that smoking affects academic performance due to the
memory loss and alteration of behavior caused by the chemicals of cigarettes which
directly affect the human brain. On the other hand, a research done by Zhao et al.
(2014) states that Smokers and nonsmokers were compared on three aspects of
the tutorial essay marks of the smokers and nonsmokers again showed that smokers
obtained significantly higher marks than nonsmokers. These data are consistent with
the idea that ambitious students adopt smoking in the belief that it will help them study
The study conducted by Zhao et al. (2014) differs from the study of Edo
(2014). The study of Edo shows that smoking leads to poor memory and behavior
alteration that badly affects academic performance, on the other hand, the study led by
Zhao and his team concluded that smoking made the user boost their academic
performance
psychologically, due to the mindset that smoking helps them in their studies. Both
study showed that smoking affects the school performance of students but in complete
different manner.
ability, people who on average had quit smoking for 2.5 years performed 25 percent
better than current smokers did. People who had never smoked scored 37 percent
"We already know that giving up smoking has huge health benefits for the body, but
this study also shows how stopping smoking can have knock-on benefits for cognitive
characterized as dimwitted and slow. They tend to shrug off these stereotypes as
artifacts of how they are when they’re on the drug. If you’ve ever had the misfortune
of enduring a pot smoker who takes you through the “beneficial” effects of marijuana
on the brain, then you’ve likely wondered if the stereotype is true. As it turns out, it is.
A study more than thirty years in the making found that smoking marijuana
permanently lowers intelligence, or IQ. Frequent pot smokers (even those who had
given up marijuana) tended to have deficits in memory, concentration, and overall IQ.
The reduction in IQ for those who smoked pot heavily prior to age 18 was most
have a significant, negative impact upon your life. To put it into context, consider that
individuals with an IQ of 110 have an average net worth of $71,000 and individuals
with an IQ of 120 have an average net worth of $128,000. It looks like smoking pot
The study of Bradberry (2015) and Warburton et al. (2015) showed that
smoking negatively affects the academic performance of the user. The only difference
is the first one studied cigarette users, and the other one uses pot marijuana, both
concluded that smoking lowers the IQ or Intelligence Quotient and lowering the
memory capacity that heavily affects the academic thinking abilities of the user. The
the samples a test to determine their abilities, the results showed that former smokers
performed better than the current smokers, but non-smokers performed the best among
the three. While Bradberry concluded that smoking pot lowers the IQ of the user by an
strongly related to smoking but studies that examine the mechanism between academic
achievement and smoking are lacking. The aim of this study, therefore, was to
these cognitions explain different patterns of smoking. Methods: The study uses the
data of a longitudinal study that was carried out in Finland, and the sample comprised
1,096 students in grades seven to nine. Results: During the seventh-grade students
with poor academic achievement reported more positive attitudes to smoking and a
refuse smoking and more intentions to smoke in the future compared to students with
interval revealed that self-efficacy to refuse smoking of students with poor grades had
become weaker compared to students with high grades. Furthermore, the influence of
partially mediated through the self-efficacy beliefs and the intention to smoke.
adolescents’ self-efficacy beliefs and the intention to smoke in the future. To reduce
needed.
LOCAL
From the study of Florendo (2014), Out of 1,866 freshman students surveyed
in Isabela State University Main Campus, Philippines, 286 were current smokers.
Findings revealed that most of the participants are in their adolescence stage, male
attainment, and their parents’ jobs require physical labor. Results showed that peer,
familial, mass media, environmental factors respectively except for the teacher factor
indicated that most of the smokers have a high level of anxiety. Anxiety is
significantly related to the developmental stage when one started smoking and sticks
he/she consumed per day. An intervention program aimed at reducing anxiety and
Findings from the 2013 Young Adult Fertility and Sexuality Study (YAFS 4)
(DRDF) and the University of the Philippines Population Institute (UPPI) show that
the levels of current drug use, drinking alcohol and smoking among young people
aged 15-24 have dropped considerably. The declining pattern is found in the practices
of both young men and women, as well as in younger and older youth. (UPPI, 2014)
influence of factors when the teenagers were grouped according to gender, the females
smoked more than the males. However, when grouped according to age (13-16 & 17-
19), there was no significant difference in their extent of influence. The teenagers were
very much aware of the effects of cigarette smoking on the biological, physical and
social implications. Despite this awareness, the drive to perform the behavior is strong.
The local studies showed correlation with each other. The studies of Moldes
(2019) and Balsa (2016) concluded that smoking does really affect the studies of the
user in terms of significant decline in grade average or GPA. Although the studies of
Florendo (2014), Kiprono (2014), and UPPI (2014) showed that the users are very
well area of the consequences of using cigarettes, they concluded that their current
From the research led by Balsa (2016), the researchers found that increases in
alcohol consumption result in small yet statistically significant reductions in GPA for
male students and in statistically non-significant changes for females. For females,
fixed-effects results are substantially smaller than OLS estimates, underscoring the
According to Moldes et al. (2019), graduating senior high school students have
encountered different factors in relation to students’ peer pressure in school and its
parenting orientation of parents and education. The results declared that there are
several factors that could affect students’ academic performance in school regarding to
peer pressure. This suggests that peer pressure does not give negative impact directly
to student toward their peers. Generally, students peer pressure in school affects the
cultural parenting among parents among parents and social belongingness can affect
student academic performance in school based on the result of the computation of chi-
square. It had been manifested that curiosity and students’ level of education does not
affect student academic performance. Hence, whatever the effects of student peer
Theoretical Framework
acetylcholine receptors, it is believed that this may disrupt the maturation of the
developing brain. Several lines of evidence have accumulated to indicate that tobacco-
externalizing behaviors, and higher cortical functions, have been examined. Although
most studies have come out against smoking during pregnancy, a few studies have
pointed to the fact that the epiphenomenon of smoking, rather than nicotine itself, is
among various candidate genes, including DAT1, DRD4, MAOA, COMT and GSTM-
1, have been reported to interact with smoking to cause an adverse behavioral profile.
Epigenetic approaches have also been initiated that carry us beyond the realm of
Notwithstanding the fact that the toxic effect that prenatal cigarette smoking exposure
improved studies across all fields are encouraged in order to form a complete picture
of nicotine as a teratogen, and it is hoped that this will emerge in the near future.
Conceptual Framework
Input Proces Output
s
How many students are:
Smokers Construction of
Non-smokers
Does smoking has effects connected to the Questionnaire A Correlational
smoker’s mathematical abilities in terms of:
Reading Comprehension Validation of Study On Rate of
Activeness
Problem Solving Skills Questionnaire Smoking and
Unit Conversion Skills
Algebraic Skills Statistical treatment Mathematical Ability
Is there a significant difference between the
mathematical ability of smokers and non-smoker of data of Grade 12
respondents in terms of the following:
Reading Comprehension Data Collecting Students in
Activeness
Problem Solving Skills Analyzing and Pamantasan ng
Unit Conversion Skills
Algebraic Skills Interpreting of data Lungsod ng
Marikina A.Y. 2019-
2020
FEEDBACK
consists of the demographic profile about the mathematical skills. The process
interpretation of data.
a. Smokers
b. Non-smokers
terms of:
a. Comprehension
b. Activeness
e. Algebraic Skills
a. Comprehension
b. Activeness
e. Algebraic Skills
HYPOTHESIS
Null:
non-smokers.
Alternative:
There is significant difference between the mathematical ability of smokers and non-
smokers.
The results of the study would be beneficial not only to the researchers but also to the
following:
to the students’ awareness about the negative effects of smoking cigarettes specifically
on their mathematical abilities that can bring huge impact on their studies and
achievements.
information about the negative effects of smoking, particularly the effects on the
mathematical ability of student smokers. This research will help them to inform and
bring further knowledge to the health- related professionals for them to widen their
knowledge about the effects of smoking to the mathematical ability of the user.
smoking on the Mathematical Ability of students. This study considers every aspect of
the students’ personal information that has an impact on their mathematical ability.
Each of the respondents are given same questionnaires to answer. And this study is
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Oxidative Stress. Imbalance between free radicals and antioxidants in the body
Secondhand Smoke. Smoke coming from Cigarettes inhaled by the people nearby.
Thirdhand Smoke. Smoke absorbed by clothes, Textiles, etc. that is later inhaled by
CHAPTER II
This chapter describes the population and the sample of this study and contains
the methods which the researchers used to determine the continuous improvement on
systems and procedures for future success. This chapter presents the research design,
procedure, data analysis and statistical treatment of data in order to measure the
variable of interest necessary for the analysis of data. In this particular study, a
RESEARCH DESIGN
The two variables are the rate of smoking and the mathematical ability of the grade 12
SAMPLING DESIGN
This study used Purposive Sampling Design to selected Grade 12 students and
will be used for the selection of the respondents only in Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng
Marikina, a sample was taken from the population and was given survey
RESEARCH RESPONDENTS
For the respondents of this study, 300 students were taken from the population
of 1200 using the sloven's formula with a confidence level of 95 (alpha level of 0.05).
population and e = Error tolerance (level). The respondents were composed of male
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
The main instrument used in this study was a survey questionnaire. The survey
questionnaire is made up of three sections. The first part of the questionnaire aims to
get the background of the students also known as demographic profile. The second
part contains a likert scale for frequency with 7 questions. And lastly, the third section
respondents.
A modified multi section survey questionnaire was used to collect the needed
data from the respondents. The researchers asked permission from the selected Grade
questionnaires. The researchers also asked the students to present their school ID to
confirm that they are certified Grade 12 students of the said university for the
credibility of the study. The respondents were asked to provide true and honest
answers for the researchers to analyze the data properly with a maximum of 12
5 4 3 2 1
Correlation.
1. Percentage
F
Formula: %= ×100
N
% is the percentage
F is the frequency
Formula:
SS1 SS 2
( x1 x 2) Sp 2
t df 1 df 2
Sp 2 Sp 2
SS sd (df )
n1 n2
CHAPTER III
the following data are gathered, collected and arranged which can be seen with more
The first section of the questionnaire aims to determine the number of smokers
and non-smokers.
F %
SMOKERS 75 25%
The table above shows the frequency of grade 12 students who smoke and who
The table 2.1 shows the computed weighted mean for the two groups gathered
from the second part of the questionnaire that contains a likert scale. The values were
used as variables for t-test for independence to know if there is a significant difference
df= 8
α= 0.05
Area of Acceptance= -2.305 to +2.305
t
Category n Mean df sd SS Sp2
Smokers
score= 33.8095
The set of values above contains gathered and computed values from the
weighted mean collected from the likert scale. The weighted mean from each category
are used as variables including the mean/ average. For the t value, a 0.05 level of
confidence was used. The t score/value computed is equal to 33.8095 and outside the
area of acceptance. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected, and the alternative
n f %
Th
Smokers 75 3 4%
e Non-Smokers 225 83 36.89%
table shows the exact number and percentage of those students who scored greater
than or equal to 70% of the test. The least required score to obtain 70% or above is a
score of 5 out of 7. Only 4% were able to get a passing score from the smokers, while
CHAPTER IX
RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter presented the summary of the study, provided the discussion and
conclusions, and offers recommendations for the study and other future studies that
For the first question, how many students are smokers and how many are not,
the researchers used frequency distribution table. Results show that 75% of the
students are not smoking and only 25% of the respondents are smoking.
For the second and third question, the weighted mean from the likert scale
served as data for the t-test for independence test with an alpha level of 0.05 that
covered the area of acceptance of negative 2.305 to positive 2.305. T- test was used to
smokers and non- smokers. The t score computed was 33.81 and is outside the area of
acceptance which means that the null hypothesis was rejected and the alternative
Therefore, it can also be stated that smoking affects the mathematical abilities
of the grade 12 students of PLMar, in accordance with the computations from the
gathered data.
CONCLUSION
From the gathered data and various treatments, the following conclusions are
given:
For the first question, 225 grade 12 students or 75% of the respondents are
non-smokers while only 75 grade 12 students or 25% of the respondents are smokers.
It can be concluded that the number of non-smokers is relatively higher than the
number of smokers.
For the second and third question, it can be concluded that smoking truly affects
difference between the scores of smokers and non-smokers from the third section of
conversion skills, and algebraic skills. There was also a huge statistical difference
between the weighted mean from the likert scale allowing the researchers to conclude
that non-smokers have better mathematical skills based on their self assessment.
Overall, the researchers concluded that non-smokers are better at math than smokers.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The future researchers may use another academic area that is not commonly
The future researchers may choose a more specific area of mathematics for a
The future researchers may correlate the students based on their demographic
The next researchers who find the study interesting may study the effects of
language or science.
The future researchers can also make the target population more specific to
The future researchers may use a more accurate questionnaire that contains
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Arasa, G., Cheruiyot, J., Kamau, S., Kiprono S. & Retuta, M. (2014). The Extent
132-134.
American Chemical Society. (2019 February 28). Smoking and alcohol: Double
https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/pressroom/presspacs/2019/acs-presspac-
february-27-2019/smoking-and-alcohol-double-trouble-for-the-brain.html
Alexander, D. (2019, February 10). New Research Shows How Nicotine Affects
shows-how-nicotine-affects-brain-neurons
Biton, C., Gonzaga, D., Moldes, V. & Moneva, J. (2019). Students, Peer Pressure
Balsa, A., Guilano, L. & French M. (2012). The effects of alcohol use on
30(1), 16-38.
Bradberry, T. (2015, February 11). Study Shows Heavy Adolescent Pot Use
https://www.forbes.com/sites/travisbradberry/2015/02/10/new-study-shows-
smoking-pot-permanently-lowers-iq/
Duque III, F. (2018). Filipino urged to choose health, stamp tobacco out.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324644.php
Haukka, A., Pennanen, M., Vartianen E., Vires, H. (n.d.). Academic achievement
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1403494811420484
Rios, R. (2017, October 1). Why People Smoke. Philstar. Retrieved from
https://www.philstar.com/the-freeman/eebu-lifestyle/2017/10/1744690/why-
people-smoke
St. Lukes Medical Center. (n.d). The III Effects of Smoking. Retrieved from
https://healthypinoy.com/health/article/smoking/ill-effects-smoking.html
The Situation of Filipino Children and Young Persons. (n.d.) Retrieved from
https://www.slideshare.net/mobile/facebookcom29/chapter-ii-who-are-the-child-
and-adolescent-learner-child-adolescent-development-educ-1-a
University of California (2019, June 28). Scientist find Thirdhand Smoke Affects
https://news.ucr.edu/articles/2019/06/28/scientists-find-thirdhand-smoke-affects-
cells-humans
APPENDICES