Metallurgical Furnaces
Metallurgical Furnaces
Metallurgical Furnaces
1288 to 1293
#2011 The Japan Institute of Metals EXPRESS REGULAR ARTICLE
A new process for producing ferromolybdenum powder master alloy without generating secondary pollutants by a two-step hydrogen
reduction process involving MoO3 and mill scale has been developed. In this process, mill scale which is an iron byproduct generated from the
steel rolling process is used as an iron source. Experimentally, ferromolybdenum powder master alloy was produced by a two-step hydrogen
reduction process: The first hydrogen reduction stage was carried at a horizontal furnace for 60 min at 848 K under a hydrogen gas at a partial
pressure of 101.3 kPa, and the second hydrogen reduction stage was done at the same furnace for 40 min at 1123 K under the same hydrogen
partial pressure. In the process, the reduction reactions of MoO3 to MoO2 and mill scale to Fe proceed simultaneously in the first reduction step,
and then the reduction reaction of MoO2 to Mo does in the second reduction step. The reaction rate of the second step in the two-step hydrogen
reduction process of MoO3 -Fe2 O3 mixture was also measured under isothermal condition in hydrogen atmosphere using TGA equipment. As an
example, at 1173 K under a hydrogen partial pressure of 101.3 kPa, almost 100% of MoO2 was reduced to Mo in 5 min. The nucleation and
growth model were found to be applicable to the reaction rate. The reaction was first order with respect to hydrogen partial pressure and had an
activation energy of 83.8 kJ/mol (20.1 kcal/mol). [doi:10.2320/matertrans.M2011037]
(Received January 28, 2011; Accepted March 4, 2011; Published May 25, 2011)
Keywords: ferromolybdenum powder master alloy, molybdenum oxide, hydrogen reduction, nucleation and growth model
1. Introduction alloy from a mixture of MoO3 with mill scale by the two-step
hydrogen reduction that is an environmental friendly process
Ferromolybdenum is an important iron molybdenum alloy compared with conventional processes. The proposed proc-
with a molybdenum content of 60–70% because it is used as ess uses mill scale instead of Fe powder as an iron source and
the main source for molybdenum alloying of high-strength- reduces MoO3 and mill scale simultaneously. The process is
low-alloy (HSLA) steels in the steel industry.1) At the present thus simple and economical compared with the previous
time, ferromolybdenum alloy is produced by either a thermite hydrogen reduction process. The mill scale is one of iron
process or a carbon reduction process.2–4) However, in the byproducts with an iron content of over 70% generated from
processes large amounts of slag and dust which cause the steel rolling process. In this paper, the rate data of the
environmental problems are inevitably generated. Specially, hydrogen reduction of MoO3 -Fe2 O3 mixture was also
the thermite process uses high cost aluminum and silicon as a thermogravimetrically measured under isothermal condition
reducing agent of MoO3 . using TGA equipment. It is therefore expected that the
Therefore, it would be highly desirable to develop an results obtained in this study will help to design the new
alternative process to manufacture ferromolybdenum alloy. process for manufacturing ferromolybdenum powder master
A technology was suggested to manufacture ferromolybde- alloy.
num powder master alloy from the mixture of MoO3 with Fe
powder using the two-step hydrogen reduction process which 2. Experimental
is used to product pure molybdenum metal powder.5) In the
two-step hydrogen reduction process, a MoO3 -Fe mixture Experiments were carried out in horizontal tube furnace to
is first reduced by hydrogen at below 923 K, whereafter determine the products from the MoO3 -mill scale reaction
the mixture obtained is manufactured to ferromolybdenum system, and a typical thermogravimetic analysis (TGA)
powder master alloy by hydrogen reduction at around apparatus similar to the one described in the previous paper
1373 K. However, the process has never been commercial- was used to measure the rate of the hydrogen reduction
ized because hydrogen used as a reducing agent of MoO3 in reaction of MoO3 -Fe2 O3 mixture.6)
the process is expensive. Although that, the process has many In the former experiments, a weighed amount of the
advantages because slag and dust are not generated in the mixture of MoO3 with mill scale was placed in an alumina
process and additional additives are not needed. Thus, there is boat (1.2 cm diameter and 8.0 cm length) which was pushed
recently growing interest in manufacturing ferromolybdenum into the central hot zone of a mullite reaction tube of 6 cm
alloy by the two-step hydrogen reduction process. However, diameter and 130 cm length that was maintained at a desired
very little fundamental information about kinetic data on the temperature. The reaction system was made oxygen-free with
two-step hydrogen reduction process is available in the an argon gas flow inside the reactor before the reactant gas
literature. was introduced at a controlled rate. The sample was heated
The present research is concerned with developing a new up to 848 K for the first hydrogen reduction, followed by the
process for manufacturing ferromolybdenum powder master second hydrogen reduction at 1173 K. During heating up to
1173 K after the first hydrogen reduction, the reactor was
*Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected] purged with argon gas. The solid product cooled in argon
A Novel Process for Producing Ferromolybdenum Powder Master Alloy without Generating Secondary Pollutants 1289
Intensity (A.U)
from one arm of which a shallow silica tray for sample was Ο Ο
suspended by a platinum chain into a reactor tube located 500 ∇ ΟΟ
Ο
∇
within vertical tubular furnace. The reactor tube was an 0
Ο
Inconel tube of 5.0 cm inner diameter and 65 cm length. 1200
MoO3 : 980 mg + Mill scale : 620 mg
The microbalance continuously recorded the mass changes
taking place during the reaction. During the experiments, 800
Ο
the balance was purged with argon gas to prevent the Ο Ο
400 ΟΟ
intrusion of reacting gas and hot gases. MoO3 -Fe2 O3 ∇ Ο
∇
mixtures weighing 690–710 mg placed in a shallow holder 0
were used in the TGA experiments. The mixture ratio was 20 40 60 80
fixed at a mixture ratio to product ferromolybdenum powder 2 Theta / degree
master alloy which contains 70 mass% Mo. The sample
Fig. 1 XRD patterns of the solid phases obtained from the first hydrogen
was maintained for 60 min at 848 K for the first hydrogen reduction step of MoO3 -mill scale mixture under a hydrogen partial
reduction, followed by the second hydrogen reduction at pressure of 101.3 kPa for 60 min at 848 K.
various temperatures. During heating after the first hydrogen
reduction, the reactor tube was purged with argon gas. The
reduction temperature and time in the first hydrogen
12000
reduction stage were respectively chosen through prelimi-
Mo
nary experiments.
10000
Hydrogen (99.9%) and argon gases (99.9%) were supplied
by Air Products Company in Korea. The MoO3 powder, 8000
manufactured by Aldrich Chemical Co., was 99.9 mass%
Intensity (A.U)
pure, and the Fe2 O3 powder (99.9 mass% pure iron) was 6000
obtained from Alfa Aesar Co. Both materials were of
74 mm size. Also, the mill scale that is one of byproducts 4000
generated from a steel rolling process of special steel Mo
company in Korea mainly contains 46.6 mass% FeO, 2000
Mo
49.9 mass% Fe2 O3 , 0.14 mass% Cu, 0.01 mass% P and
Fe2Mo Fe2Mo3
Al2 O3 , CaO, MgO, and SiO2 as minor amounts. Usually, it 0
was known that the control amount of impurities in
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
ferromolybdenum alloy is below 0.5 mass% for copper and
0.06 mass% for phosphorous because they have deleterious 2 Theta / degree
effects on the mechanical properties of the alloyed steel
Fig. 2 XRD pattern of the solid phase obtained from the second hydrogen
produced. It is thus considered that the mill scale can be reduction step under a hydrogen partial pressure of 101.3 kPa for 40 min at
used as an iron source for manufacturing ferromolybdenum 1123 K after the first hydrogen reduction step of MoO3 -mill scale mixture
alloy. The mill scale used for this study was 100 mm in size. under a hydrogen partial pressure of 101.3 kPa for 60 min at 848 K.
1.0
0.8
Reduction ratio ( - )
0.6
0.4
1.0
1600 Ο
Ο MoO2
∇ Fe
K
Reduction ratio, (-)
0.8
1173
FeO
Intensity (A.U)
1200
K
23
0.6
10
800
Ο 0.4
Ο
400 ∇ Ο
0.2 For MoO3 + Mill scale sample
Ο Ο
Ο ∇ For MoO3 sample
0.0
0 0 200 400 600 800
20 40 60 80 Time, t/s
2 Theta / degree
Fig. 8 Reduction ratio of MoO2 in the second step of the two-step
Fig. 6 XRD pattern of the solid phase obtained from the first hydrogen hydrogen reduction reaction of MoO3 -Fe2 O3 mixture and pure MoO3
reduction step of MoO3 -Fe2 O3 mixture under a hydrogen partial pressure powder under a hydrogen partial pressure of 101.3 kPa.
of 101.3 kPa for 60 min at 848 K.
1.0
1.0
0.8
2
2
Reduction ratio, XMnO
0.8
Reduction ratio, XMoO
0.6
0.6
PH (kPa)
2
0.4 10.1
0.4
Temp. ( K ) 30.4
1023 50.7
0.2 1073 0.2 70.9
1123
101.3
1173
0.0 0.0
0 200 400 600 800 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Time, t / s Time, t / s
Fig. 7 Effect of reaction temperature on the reaction of the second step in Fig. 9 Effect of hydrogen partial pressure on the reaction of the second
the two-step hydrogen reduction of MoO3 -Fe2 O3 mixture under a step in the two-step hydrogen reduction of MoO3 -Fe2 O3 mixture under a
hydrogen partial pressure of 101.3 kPa. reaction temperature of 1123 K.
effect of the reduced iron on the reduction of MoO2 in the shrinking-core model and power law, from which nucleation
second step was examined to be nearly negligible, as shown and growth model proved to yield the best results. On the
in Fig. 8. Figure 8 shows the results for the reduction other hand, several researchers reported that the nucleation
reaction of MoO2 in the second step of the two-step hydrogen and growth model was found to fit the hydrogen reduction
reduction reaction of MoO3 -Fe2 O3 mixture and pure MoO3 reaction rate of metal oxides.5,6) The applicability of this rate
powder under a hydrogen partial pressure of 101.3 kPa. These expression can be expected from the phenomenon that
results might be explained by the fact that as shown in Fig. 5, hydrogen might be adsorbed on the MoO2 particles that form
the hydrogen reduction rate of Fe2 O3 powder is much faster nuclei like Hx MoO3 before reacting with MoO2 .7) In this rate
than that of MoO3 . expression, the reduction ratio of MoO2 to Mo is related to
The effect of hydrogen partial pressure on the reaction was the reaction time by8)
examined by varying the hydrogen partial pressure between
½ lnð1 XMoO2 Þ1=m ¼ kapp t ð1Þ
10.1 kPa and 101.3 kPa in an argon atmosphere, while the
reaction temperature was kept constant at 1123 K. This was where XMoO2 is the reduction ratio of MoO2 , m is a constant,
done by varying the flow rates of hydrogen and argon gases kapp is the apparent rate constant (s1 ), and t is the reaction
while maintaining the total flow rate at 8.3 ml/s. Figure 9 time (s) which is given by
shows the effect of hydrogen partial pressure on the reaction.
kapp ¼ b k f ðpH2 Þ ¼ b k pH2 n ð2Þ
These curves show that the reduction ratio increases with
increasing hydrogen partial pressure and almost 100% of Here, b is the stoichiometry constant (b ¼ 1=2 in this system,
MoO2 is reduced to Mo in 50 min at 1123 K under a hydrogen according to the formulation of Sohn9)) for the hydrogen
partial pressure of 10.1 kPa. reduction reaction of MoO2 to Mo, k is the intrinsic rate
The interpretation of the rate data was performed using a constant (s1 kPan ), pH2 is the hydrogen partial pressure
number of different rate equations including the spherical (kPa) in the bulk gas, f designates the partial pressure
1292 B.-S. Kim, S.-B. Kim, H.-I. Lee and Y.-Y. Choi
2 0.010
K First order
2 3 0.008
11
ln [ - ln ( 1-X MoO ) ]
2
kapp / s-1
K 0.006
7 3
11 K
23
10
0.004
K
-2 73
10
0.002
Experimental data
Best fit data
-4 0.000
3 4 5 6 7 0 20 40 60 80 100
ln t / s pH / kPa
2
Fig. 10 Plots of ln½ lnð1 XMoO2 Þ versus ln t using the rate data of Fig. 7 Fig. 12 Dependence of the apparent reaction rate constant on the partial
according to eq. (1).
pressure of hydrogen from the results shown in Fig. 9.
2
-8.0
a a
0 kP kP E = 83.8 kJ/mol
4
ln [ - ln ( 1-X MoO ) ]
3 .
1. a 30
10 kP
2
.9 -8.5
ln K / S -1 ·kPa -1
70
-2 a
a kP
kP .1
.7 10
50 -9.0
-4
Experimental data
Best fit data -9.5
-6
3 4 5 6 7 8
8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
ln t / s 4
10 / T / K
Fig. 11 Plots of ln½ lnð1 XMoO2 Þ versus ln t using the rate data of Fig. 9
according to eq. (1). Fig. 13 Arrhenius plot of the intrinsic rate constants obtained from the
results of Fig. 7.
Experimental results showed that ferromolybdenum pow- with kapp ¼ 6:75 X 101 exp½10; 078=T pH2 (s1 )
der master alloy could be produced from the mixture of
MoO3 with mill scale by a two-step hydrogen reduction Acknowledgements
process. This process scheme is attractive because the
process can use mill scale instead of Fe powder as an iron This research was supported by the General Research
source and reduces MoO3 and mill scale simultaneously Project of Korea Institute of Geosciences and Mineral
without generating any solid waste. In the process, the Resources (KIGAM) funded by the Ministry of Knowledge
reduction reactions of MoO3 to MoO2 and mill scale to Fe Economy of Korea.
proceed simultaneously in the first reduction step, and then
the reduction reaction of MoO2 to Mo and the alloying
REFERENCES
phenomenon between Mo and Fe powders reduced do
simultaneously in the second reduction step. The rate of the 1) R. Q. Barr: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology vol. 15,
second step in the two-step hydrogen reduction reaction of 3rd ed., (America: John Wiley & Sons, 1981) pp. 670–682.
MoO3 -Fe2 O3 mixture was found to be very fast. For example, 2) Samsun Logix Corp., Seoul, Korea, private communication (February,
at 1173 K under a hydrogen partial pressure of 101.3 kPa, 2008).
3) K. Jamshidi, H. Abdizadeh, S. A. Seyyed Ebrahimi and K. Hanai: Int. J.
almost 100% of MoO2 was reduced to Mo in 5 min. The
Refractory Metals Hard Mater. 22 (2004) 243–245.
nucleation and growth model was applicable in describing 4) G. Li, D. Wang, X. Jin and G. Z. Chen: Electrochem. Commun. 9 (2007)
the kinetics of the reaction of the second step in the two-step 1951–1957.
hydrogen reduction reaction of MoO3 -Fe2 O3 mixture over 5) M. M. Gasik and P. N. Ostrik: J. Thermal Anal. 40 (1993) 313–319.
the entire temperature range. The reaction was first order with 6) B. S. Kim, E. Y. Kim, H. S. Jeon, H. I. Lee and J. C. Lee: Mater. Trans.
respect to hydrogen partial pressure and had an activation 49 (2008) 2147–2152.
7) H. Sakagami, Y. Asano, T. Ohno, N. Takahashi, H. Itoh and T. Matsuda:
energy of 83.8 kJ/mol (20.1 kcal/mol). The reaction rate of Appl. Cataly. A 297 (2006) 189–197.
the second step in the two-step hydrogen reduction reaction 8) H. Y. Sohn and S. Won: Metall. Trans. B 16B (1985) 831–839.
of MoO3 -Fe2 O3 mixture is represented by the following 9) H. Y. Sohn: Metall. Trans. B 9B (1978) 89–96.
equation: