Assurance Engagement: Draft

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

ACCA AA

Draft

Assurance Engagement
An assurance engagement is one in which:

A practitioner aims to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence in order to express a


conclusion designed to enhance the degree of confidence of the intended users other than
the responsible party about the outcome of the measurement or evaluation of an
underlying subject matter against criteria.

Elements of an assurance engagement

Lecture support notes by Alan Biju Palak


An assurance engagement performed by a practitioner will consist of the
following elements:
(a)  A three party relationship. The three parties are the intended user, the responsible
party and the practitioner (each party is described in the Key terms box below). 


(b)  A subject matter. This is the data to be evaluated that has been prepared by the
responsible party. It can take many forms, including financial performance.

(c)  Suitable criteria. The subject matter is evaluated or measured against criteria in
order to reach an opinion. 


(d)  Evidence. Sufficient appropriate evidence needs to be gathered to support the


required level of assurance. 


(e)  An assurance report. A written report containing the practitioner's opinion is issued
to the intended user, in the form appropriate to a reasonable assurance engagement or a
limited assurance engagement. 


For any queries - [email protected] Page 1


ACCA AA
Draft
The revised ISAE distinguishes between two forms of assurance engagements:

Reasonable assurance engagements

Limited assurance engagements 


The objective of a reasonable assurance engagement is a reduction in


assurance engagement risk to an acceptably low level in the circumstances of the
engagement as the basis for the assurance practitioner's conclusion (ISAE 3000 (Revised):
para.12ia). The conclusion would usually be expressed in a positive form.

Limited assurance is a lower level of assurance. The nature, timing and extent of the
procedures carried out by the practitioner in a limited assurance engagement would be
limited compared with what is required in a reasonable assurance engagement.

Lecture support notes by Alan Biju Palak


Nevertheless, the procedures performed should be planned to obtain a level of assurance
which is meaningful, in the practitioner's professional judgement.

For a limited assurance engagement, the conclusion conveys whether, based on the
procedures performed and evidence obtained, a matter(s) has come to the practitioner's
attention to cause the practitioner to believe the subject matter information is materially
misstated (ISAE 3000 (Revised): para.12ib).

This would usually be expressed in a negative form of words.

Review Engagement
The objective of a review engagement is to obtain limited assurance about whether the
subject matter information is free from material misstatement.

Types of review engagements


(a) An attestation engagement: This is where the underlying subject matter has not been
measured or evaluated by the practitioner, and the practitioner concludes whether or not
the subject matter information is free from material misstatement (ISAE 3000: para.
12aiia).

(b) A direct engagement: This is where the underlying subject matter has been measured
and evaluated by the practitioner, and the practitioner then presents conclusions on the
reported outcome in the assurance report (ISAE 3000: para.12aiib).

For any queries - [email protected] Page 2


ACCA AA
Draft
True and fair
True: Information is factual and conforms with reality. In addition, the information
conforms with required standards and law. The financial statements have been correctly
extracted from the books and records.

Fair: Information is free from discrimination and bias and in compliance with expected
standards and rules. The accounts should reflect the commercial substance of the
company's underlying transactions.

Lecture support notes by Alan Biju Palak

For any queries - [email protected] Page 3

You might also like