Marketing Variance Analysis
Marketing Variance Analysis
Marketing Variance Analysis
© 2013 Thomas Kinnear, Stu James, and Management by the Numbers, Inc.
Net Marketing Contribution
Revenues $100
Less: Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) $ 40
= Gross Profit or Gross Margin $ 60
Less Expenses:
Marketing Expenses (ME) $ 20
Other Overhead Expenses $ 30
= Net Income $ 10
Revenues $100
Less: Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) $ 40
= Gross Profit or Gross Margin $ 60
Less:
Marketing Expenses (ME) $ 20
= Net Marketing Contribution (NMC) $ 40
Less:
Marketing Expenses (ME) $ 20
= Net Marketing Contribution (NMC) $ 40
Units Sold 20
x Margin (or Price $5 – Unit Cost $2) $ 3
= Gross Profit or Gross Margin $ 60
We may want to break this down even further to enhance our analysis.
We’ve already discussed that Margin equals the selling price less the
unit cost, but we could also further refine volume (units sold).
Definitions
Volume = Market Demand x Market Share
Margin = Price – Unit Cost
Insight
We’ve left out many details here, but take a moment to realize that this
general approach may be used for determining the profitability of a
particular product line, of a sales channel (with different margins,
demand, and share), of services, etc. At the Income Statement level,
sales of all products and services through all channels are combined.
Managerially, we want to break out this analysis into finer detail to help
us improve the effectiveness of our marketing plan (product lines,
pricing, discounts, promotions, resource allocation, etc.)
NMC EXAMPLES
Question 1: Fred’s Fine Foods distributes Phil’s Phabulous Olive Oil
along with many other products from different companies. The oil sells
for $20 / bottle retail and Fred sells 300 units. Fred spent $500 on
advertising and his rent is $2000. Phil sells the oil to its distributors for
$10 / bottle and it costs $5 to produce. Of the $500 that Fred spent on
advertising, 50% was provided by Phil in the form of co-op advertising
as an incentive to its distributors. What is the NMC of the Olive Oil
from Fred’s point of view and what is the NMC of using Fred as a
channel from Phil’s point of view?
Answer:
NMC (Fred / Oil) = Units Sold x Margin – Marketing Expenditures
= 300 x ($20 - $10) - .50 * $500
= 300 x $10 - $250 = $2,750
NMC (Phil / Fred) = Units Sold x Margin – Marketing Expenditures
= 300 x ($10 - $5) - .50 * $500
= 300 x $5 - $250 = $1,250
NMC EXAMPLES
Question 2: Sylvia estimates total demand for cell phone service in
Collegeville at 200,000 subscribers. MyMobile has 15% of the market.
The price of the standard service is $40/month. There is no variable
cost. Sylvia recently ran a marketing promotion of 50% off a six month
subscription. Sylvia spent $750,000 on print and TV advertising for the
special promotion and she had 5,000 new subscribers sign up. What
is the NMC for 6 months for the current subscribers of MyMobile?
What is the NMC for Sylvia’s special promotion for the 6 month period?
What else might Sylvia want to consider?
Answer:
NMC (Current Sub.) = Units Sold x Margin – Marketing Expenditures
= 200,000 x .15 x 6 * ($40 - $0) - $0
= 30,000 x $240 - $0 = $7,200,000
NMC (Promotion) = Units Sold x Margin – Marketing Expenditures
= 5,000 x 6 * ($40 * .5 - $0) - $750,000
= 5,000 x $120 – 750,000 = -$150,000
NMC EXAMPLES
Insight
It should be noted that the analysis in this example, but especially in
real life, is not simple. Perhaps Sylvia should consider Customer
Lifetime Value (CLV) in her analysis of the promotion (positive impact).
Maybe Sylvia wonders how many of those 5000 customers would
have selected MyMobile without the special promotion (negative
financial impact). Either of these two issues is likely to have a huge
impact on the NMC calculations from a managerial (planning)
perspective. The accounting is relatively straightforward, but the
marketing decision-making is complex and fraught with ambiguity and
assumptions. Though we have more data all the time, we still have to
choose the right data and appropriate analysis for the problem at hand,
and use our judgment and experience to arrive at a good decision.
Sales
Outcomes NMC is marketing’s “bottom
Market Share NMC line” for financial results.
(Results)
NMC
Market = Demand
Potential
(Demand x Share = Volume)
Market
Share = Share
A marketing plan should
Margins = Price - Cost consist of specific estimates
for each of these variables!
Marketing
Exp ($) = Marketing Exp ($)
NMC = NMC
MARKETING PLAN
NMC = Volume x Margin – Marketing Expenditures
- or -
NMC = (Demand x Share) x (Price – Cost) – Marketing Expenditures
Answer:
Planned NMC = (Demand x Share) x (Price – Cost) – Marketing Exp.
= (400,000 x .35) x ($1 - $.40) - $80,000
= Volume x Margin – Marketing Exp$
= 140,000 x $.60 - $80,000 = $4,000
Answer:
So, we can say that the variance between the planned NMC and the actual
NMC was -$19,000 ($4,000 - $15,000), but we still need a few additional
pieces of the NMC equation for a more complete analysis.
Where:
V= Unit Volume, M=Margin, ME=Marketing Expenditures,
S=Market Share, D=Market Demand, P=Price, C=Variable Cost
a = actual p = planned
Source: This general structure is well presented by Roger Best, Market-Based Management, 6th Edition, Chapter 15, “Performance Metrics and Strategy Implementation”, and by others.
Insight
Using this analysis, it is clear that the share variance of -$120,000 was
the most significant problem, and that the positive effect of the demand
variance of $126,000 almost made up for the three negative variances.
Insight
The marketing plan seems to be spot on at both the top level and the
first level of variance analysis. The real information is seen at the
demand/share/price/cost/expenditure level. The question then
becomes what causes the variance at this level?
MBTN | Management by the Numbers 20
Variance Analysis – Root Causes