Ethics in Nursing Leadership: Transactional, Transformational, and Authentic Leadership Are Popular Models
Ethics in Nursing Leadership: Transactional, Transformational, and Authentic Leadership Are Popular Models
Ethics in Nursing Leadership: Transactional, Transformational, and Authentic Leadership Are Popular Models
HEALTHCARE ETHICS
MODULE 2:
ETHICS IN NURSING
LEADERSHIP
INTRODUCTION
While leadership has been explored extensively across disciplines, the role of ethics in
leadership or ethical leadership has received focused attention only within the last 15 years and
primarily in the business literature (Storch, Makaroff, Pauly, & Newton, 2013). This current
interest is undoubtedly related to recent and ongoing scandals in business, government, sports,
nonprofits, religious, and health care organizations (Dinh, Lord, Gardner, Meuser, & Hu, 2014;
Sama & Schoaf, 2008). In nursing, Nightingale and other early nurse leaders gave specific
attention to ethics, with chapters, articles, and books written about the ethical behavior and
responsibilities of nurse leaders (Aikens, 1916/1935; Ulrich, 1992). Makaroff, Storch, Pauly, and
Newton (2014) note, however, that attention to ethics and nursing leadership has waned over the
last two decades perhaps contributing to a deficient ethical climate and pervasive moral distress
among nurses. These authors (Makaroff et al., 2014) and others (Edmonson, 2015; Gallagher &
Tschudin, 2010; Keselman, 2012) call for renewed attention to ethics in nursing education and
leadership. This attention is especially significant in the current health care environment as
ethical leaders may influence peer/employee ethical conduct in situations that may have great
impact on patient outcomes, safety, and quality care (Keselman, 2012; Piper, 2011; Piper &
Tallman, 2015).
While leadership has been explored extensively across disciplines, the role
of ethics in leadership or ethical leadership has received focused
attention only within the last 15 years and primarily in the business
literature (Storch, Makaroff, Pauly, & Newton, 2013).
The terms “macro,” “meso,” and “micro” reflect the environment of practice rather than the
magnitude of influence of the ethical nurse leader. In addition, a nurse may be an ethical leader
in several levels, for example, a staff nurse or nurse manager who is also a member of the
institutional ethics committee or professional organization(s).
At the macro-level, ethical nursing leaders are spokespersons, political strategists,
researchers, and advocates for social justice and health care reform. These leaders also ensure
that nurses’ views on and experiences of ethical issues are heard and represented in various
national and international forums. For example, Marla Weston, Chief Executive Officer,
American Nurses Association, has championed federal legislation regarding safe nurse staffing
presently under review in the U. S. Senate, the Registered Nurse Safe Staffing Act of 2014
(ANA, 2014). Carol Pavlish, Associate Professor, UCLA School of Nursing, and colleagues
have conducted extensive research on moral distress in nursing (2013, 2015a, 2015b), developed
an early intervention tool to mitigate its deleterious effects (2014, 2015c), and an evidence-based
action guide for nurse leaders (2016). Pavlish and her co-investigators have also explored
gender-based violence in South Sudan and Rwanda and identified the global advocacy role of
nursing in supporting these vulnerable populations (Pavlish, Ho, & Runkle, 2012).
At the meso-, or organizational, level, the nurse executive “serve(s) as the conscience of the
health-care team” by avoiding compromises that lead to decreased standards of care or negate
nurses’ contributions (Storch et al., 2013, p. 4). These nurse leaders interpret nursing concerns
clearly and support research and guidelines for ethical practice and quality patient care. In
addition, as exemplified by Donna Casey, they ensure that ethics resources are available and
used by nurses. Ms. Casey, Director of Patient Care Services, Cardiovascular and Critical Care at
Christiana Care, participates in and mentors nurses in preventative ethics strategies. She has also
integrated the Code of Ethics into the performance appraisal and peer review process to “help
nurses make a clear connection between their ethical obligations and what they do at the
bedside” (Trossman, 2013). A selected example of the Registered Nurse III competencies and
associated ethical obligations contained in the Christiana Care performance review tool is
presented in Box 8.2.
Nursing directors and nurse managers are leaders at both the organizational and unit levels.
They are called on to foster healthy work environments and create a climate of caring and
connectedness. These frontline leaders must also recognize the importance of meeting nurses’
needs in order to meet client needs, and provide meaningful participation in decision making.
The nurse director/manager position is critical to organizational success, patient outcomes, and
nurse empowerment (Duffield, Roche, Blay, & Stasa, 2011; Lucas, Laschinger, & Wong, 2008;
Wong et al., 2010). Over the past two decades, this role has become increasingly complex as
these nurses may lead one or more units and have increased responsibility for budget, staffing,
and regulatory compliance (Hewko, Brown, Fraser, Wong, & Cummings, 2014; Kath, Stichler,
& Ehrhart, 2012; Shirey, McDaniel, Ebright, Fisher, & Doebbeling, 2010). These responsibilities
and others may create tension between personal values, the ethical obligations of the profession,
and working within the priorities and needs of the organization.
The challenging position of the frontline nurse manager or leader in ethical situations was
explored by several researchers (Aitamaa, Leino-Kilpi, Puukka, & Suhonen, 2010; Pavlish et al.,
2015b; Porter, 2010). Many issues identified by the nursing leaders in these studies are similar to
those reported by direct care nurses. However, they occur at multiple levels as presented in Box
8.3, and reflect the nurse manager/leader’s complex role in navigating diverse perspectives.
Rather than taking a proactive stance or intervening early in these situations, Pavlish and
colleagues (2015b) reported that the nurse leaders in their investigation often waited until the
conflicts escalated. Reasons for the delay included perceptions that intervening could be risky,
harm relationships, and/or jeopardize their ability to accomplish other initiatives. Although many
participants believed that system-level issues contributed to ethical conflicts, few identified
approaches to operate at the organizational level to change those contributing factors. Pavlish
and colleagues concluded that the frontline nurse manager or leader may need to develop “more
awareness, skill, and confidence in working with institutional level ethics” (p. 317).
https://nursekey.com/applying-ethics-to-the-leadership-role-3/
Worth some thoughtful reflections..
Ethical Model
An Ethical Model for Reflection: Questions to Consider
Frameworks or models can help people order their approach to an ethical problem or concern,
and they can be a useful tool to guide nurses in their thinking about a particular issue or question.
When it is appropriate, colleagues in nursing and other disciplines, ethics committees, ethicists,
professional nurses associations and colleges of nurses and other experts will be included in
discussions of ethical problems. Legislation, standards of practice, policies and guidelines of
nurses’ unions and professional associations and colleges may also be useful in ethical reflection
and decision-making.
Ethical reflection (which begins with a review of one’s own ethics and judgment) is required to
determine how a particular value or responsibility applies in a particular nursing context. There
is room within the profession for disagreement among nurses about the relative weight of
different ethical values and principles. More than one proposed intervention may be ethical and
reflective of good ethical practice. Discussion and questioning are extremely helpful in the
resolution of ethical problems and issues.
Ethical models can facilitate discussion among team members by opening up a moral space for
everyone to participate in the conversation about ethics. There are many models for ethical
reflection and for ethical decision-making in the health-care ethics literature, and some of these
are noted in this section.
• Do the individuals involved in the situation have different values? Do the differences create
conflict?
2. Reflecting on and reviewing potential actions: Recognizing available choices and how these
choices are valued
• What expectation does the person/family/community have for care?
What actions do the person/family/community think will do the most good? Have I helped this
person/family/community become clear about what they value and the actions they think will be
taken?
• What action(s) do I think will do the most good? What do other health-care providers think?
• What action(s) will cause the least amount of value conflict and/or moral distress? What are the
potential consequences of the actions? How will key persons be affected?
• What values does society view as important in this situation? What are societal expectations of
care?
• What economic and political factors play a role in the person’s care? What actions are possible
given the existing resources and constraints?
• What legislation applies to this situation in terms of my obligations, the institution’s obligations
and the obligations of other health-care providers? Are there legal implications for different
actions?
3. Selecting an ethical action: Maximizing the good
• What do I believe is the best action?
• Can I support the patient’s/family’s/community’s choice? The choice of other care providers?
If not, what actions do I need to take?
• Are there constraints that might prevent me from taking ethical action?
• Do I have the kind of virtues required to take ethical action? Do I have the necessary
knowledge and skill?
• Do I have the moral courage to carry out the action I believe is best? Will I be supported in my
decision?
4. Engaging in ethical action
• Am I acting according to the Code? • Am I practising the way a reasonably prudent nurse
would practise in this situation?
• Am I acting with care and compassion in my relationships with others in this situation?
• Am I meeting professional and institutional expectations in this action?
violates their moral code. For example, the nurse failed to prevent the intervention in the futility
case, creating a moral conflict that left her with moral residue. Second, individuals may become
so entrenched in the culture in which they work that their moral code begins to incorporate
elements of their host culture (Markus & Kitayama, 2003; Monteverde, 2014; Snow, 2009;
Zimbardo, 2007). What becomes normal clinical practice can violate compassionate, evidence-
based care of patients in some unit/organizational cul- tures. Extensive arguments have been
offered by situa- tional philosophers and social psychologists that moral character will be traded
for situational acceptance. Monteverde (2014) and Erdil and Korkmax (2009) called for new
ethics education for nurses; both identified the influence of the so-called hidden or informal
curricu- lum to which students are exposed during clinical prac- tice. Practicing nurses are
exposed to the same organiza- tional culture that deals compassionately with difficult patients,
confronts patient safety issues, supports patient advance directives, or does not. Resilient people
employ transformational coping strategies of understanding and contextualizing the cir-
cumstances of the situation. They see the reality of the culture in which they work and
sometimes must take action that does not support the cultural norm. They couple this with
situation-focused problem solving to reframe the event in terms of a challenge over which they
have some level of control. Resilience is cultivated when nurses are able to frame their
experiences contex- tually in environments with different, even competing moral systems while
maintaining a healthy sense of commitment, control, and challenge.
Moral resilience is the ability to deal with an ethically adverse situation without
lasting effects of moral dis- tress and moral residue. This requires morally coura-
geous action, activating needed supports and doing the right thing
Van Den Berg (2004) defined prestige resilience as “the set of reactive attitudes, which allows a
person to cope with the per- manent public presence of cultural others, without harming or
denying her own identity” (p. 197). According to Litz and co-authors (2009), …the idea is not to
try and fix the past, but rather to draw a firm line around the past and its related associations, so
that the mistakes of the past do not define the present and the future and so that a pre-occupation
with the past does not prevent possible future good. (p. 704) Do morally resilient nurses manage
moral distress sit- uations in clinical practice differently, avoiding moral residue that erodes their
moral integrity? As Epstein and Hamric (2009) noted in their research, the answer to this
question is unknown. Mealer and colleagues (2012) commented, “…future research is needed to
better understand coping mechanisms employed by highly resilient nurses and how they maintain
a healthier psy- chological profile” (p. 292). This author believes research on the development of
resilience could yield promising ways to combat moral distress and moral residue, as well as
better understand the development of moral courage and moral resilience (Mealer et al, 2012;
Monteverde, 2014; Moore, 2014; Rushton et al., 2015; Wagnild, 2014). Because resilience can
be learned, an individual needs to understand what characteristics are most important to develop.
In our MODULE 2, we shall endeavor to move further understanding ETHICS in the context of
leadership in Nursing Practic. We will have less lecture times this week and more on
collaborative activities and concept engagement.