Plaintiff Judicial Corruption Victims Sue Judge Thomas G Wilson
Plaintiff Judicial Corruption Victims Sue Judge Thomas G Wilson
Plaintiff Judicial Corruption Victims Sue Judge Thomas G Wilson
NOTICE OF APPEAL
INDEPENDENT ACTION
FOR RELIEF FROM GOVERNMENT CRIMES, CORRUPTION,
FACIALLY FRAUDULENT WRIT OF EXECUTION,
AND FORGED AND VOID judgments and orders
____________________________________________________________________________/
AND the Grantors hereby covenant with said Grantees that the Grantors are lawfully
seized of said riparian upland and adjoining riparian street land on the Gulf of
Mexico in fee simple; that the Grantors have good right and lawful authority to sell
and convey said riparian Gulf-front upland and street land on said Gulf as legally
described in reference to said private 1912 Subdivision Plat; that the Grantors
hereby fully warrant the unimpeachable record title to said riparian accreted street and
up-lands on the Gulf of Mexico and pursuant to the Lee County, State of Florida, and
Federal Public Records have defended and will defend their marketable record title
against the lawful and unlawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and in particular,
against the prima facie unlawful and criminal claims of Lee County, the State of
Florida, and the United States of America, and their corrupt Agents, Officials of
record, and the Defendants in their private individual capacities of record such as,
e.g., Joel F. Dubina, Charlene E. Honeywell, Sheri Polster Chappell, Gerald B.
Tjoflat, John E. Steele, Stanley F. Birch, Jr., Tony West; and that said accreted
riparian street and up-lands on the Gulf of Mexico are free of any legitimate and valid
encumbrances and/or judgments, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31,
2010; zoning, building code and other restrictions legitimately imposed by lawful
governmental authority; outstanding oil, gas, mineral, and or any other interests of
record, if any; and private riparian water-front easements of record, restrictions, if
any, and unimpeachable private implied street and alley easements of record as
conveyed in reference to said 1912 Plat.”
2
DEF. WILSON’S ADMISSION OF INCOMPETENCE & OBJECTIVE PARTIALITY
2. Doc. # 67, mailed on 08/19/2010, indisputably proved that Def. objectively partial and
Crooked Judge Thomas G. Wilson “had no familiarity with any of the facts.”
“… I had no familiarity with any of the facts.” Doc. # 67, p. 2.
Here in particular, Def. Wilson had “no familiarity with”, e.g.:
a. Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912);
b. Lee County INSTRUMENT 2010000171344; WARRANTY DEED;
c. Collier County Public Record, INSTRUMENT 4450927; WARRANTY DEED;
d. APPEAL from Case 2:2007-cv-00228;
e. 2006 STATE Court Case, BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA;
f. The falsified “July 29, 2009, judgment”;
g. The unsubstantiated and falsified “$5,000 attorney’s fees” for extortion purposes;
h. The fabricated “rule 38 motion”, Fed.R.App.P., which Defendant Appellee K. M.
Wilkinson had admittedly NOT filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit.
3
6. Here, absolutely nothing barred Plaintiffs’ direct attack of, e.g., the facially void
judgments, fraud on the Courts since 2006, organized Government crime and
corruption, racketeering and fraud. Here, Def. Wilson deceived the Court:
“In view of prior dismissals, this complaint is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.”
See Doc. # 67, p. 4.
DIRECT ATTACK OF BRAZEN FRAUD ON THE COURTS SINCE 2006
7. Here, the Plaintiff unimpeachable record title holders to riparian Gulf-front Lot 15A
directly attacked publicly recorded organized judicial crime and corruption in Florida
Courts.
a. Here, the original Federal Case, 2:2007-cv-00228, is under appeal and attack for, e.g.,
publicly recorded Government racketeering, retaliation, extortion, fraud, fraud on
the Courts, and deliberate deprivations, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242;
b. Here, the purported “factual findings” by Crooked Magistrate Wilson are under direct
attack, 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), and conclusively controverted by U.S., Florida, and Lee
County Public Records;
c. Government corruption and crimes did not, and could not have possibly, created
“finality” but voided record deception, trickery, and fraud on the Courts since 2006.
“RES PERVERTA”
10. On the public record, Def. Wilson is confusing “res perverta” and “res judicata”. Just like
criminal Catholic Church Officials conspired to “create finality”, cover up, and conceal
organized Church crime and corruption, here Def. Wilson conspired to conceal rape of the
law under fraudulent pretenses of “res judicata” and color of office.
“With the federal defendants dismissed, and no federal claim having been alleged, the
court should not exercise …”, Doc. # 67, p. 9.
With the rapists dismissed, and rape having been proven, the victims bleeding.
the Church and court should now cover up, conceal, and continue their charade.
Here, Def. Wilson conspired with other Crooked Officials to pervert the law and “res
judicata”. Here as a matter of law, res judicata could not have possibly applied, because
4
a. The causes of action and claims for relief were DIFFERENT;
b. The causes of action could NOT have possibly arisen in the past;
c. The parties were DIFFERENT;
d. The U.S. Courts had DENIED jurisdiction, Case 2:2007-cv-00228, under APPEAL;
e. Pending APPEAL, there was of course NO “final judgment on the merits” and the issues
of the prima facie criminality and nullity of, e.g.:
Fake “land parcels”;
Fake “lot” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”
Fake “block” “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;
Fake “park”; see PB 3 PG 25 (1912);
Falsified “plat”;
Fabricated “rule 38 motion”;
Falsified “$5,000 attorney’s fees”;
Fictitious “July 29, 2009, judgment”.
f. The Crooked Judges perpetrated FRAUD ON THE COURT.
11. Here, neither the publicly recorded fraud on the Courts nor the Plaintiff record title
holders and tax payers, Lot 15A, will go away. Here, objectively partial and corrupt Def.
Wilson conspired to keep the Plaintiffs away from the Court for illegal purposes of
obstructing any opportunity of justice and meaningful court access. See 28 U.S.C. § 455.
RECORD LACK OF “authority”, LOCAL RULE 6, 6.02
12. Here, Defendant Crooked Judge Wilson lacked any “authority” to “report and recommend”,
e.g. (Doc. # 67):
a. Government corruption;
b. Organized Government crime;
c. Cover-up;
d. Coercion of the Plaintiffs to refrain from prosecution and defense of their perfect title;
e. Government malfeasance;
f. Perversion of the law;
g. Fabrication of “factual findings”.
“In light of that circumstance, the allegations of fraud, bribery, and conspiracy
should be stricken as impertinent and scandalous.” Doc. # 67, p. 3.
5
In light of that circumstance, we shall agree that the patently clear proof of rape
should be concealed and covered up; otherwise the scandal will strike the Judges
and priests in our crime organization.
6
c. Was devoid of the falsified “Lee County” park.
Here, Def. Wilson knew that as a matter of law the fraudulently pretended conveyance of
said fake “land parcels” in reference to said 1912 Plat had been legally and factually
impossible.
7
had ever ordered any “title transfer”, Lot 15A, against the Plaintiffs’ will. Here, no eminent
domain or adverse possession judgment or document had ever existed.
“Upon reading of the complaint, I have no concrete idea what happened.” Id., p. 3.
“Other defendants had something to do with the record of title to the property.” Id., p. 2.
Here, Def. Government idiot T. G. Wilson “played so dumb” that he confused, e.g.:
a. Causes of action;
b. Claims for relief;
c. Parties;
d. Actions.
26. Here, the Plaintiff record owners and holders of indisputable Warranty Deed, Lot 15A, can
only live in further fear of injury from, e.g., said publicly recorded judicial
a. Corruption;
b. Idiocy;
c. Ignorance;
d. Irrationality;
e. Recklessness.
8
29. Here admittedly, Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson, Crooked Lee County Property
Appraiser, had filed a “Motion for Sanctions pursuant to Eleventh Circuit Rule 27-4”.
Here, Defendant Crooked Magistrate Wilson knew, fraudulently concealed, and conspired
with other Government Agents to conceal that Def. Wilkinson did not file a “Rule 38” or
“frivolous appeal” motion:
DEFENDANT WILKINSON FILED “RULE 27-4 motion [frivolous motion]”, DOC. # 386