Joseph Shapiro is a fraud and a hypocrite and must be

exposed. Go to Official Web-site to learn more: https://

josephshapirojournalist.wordpress.com/
Joseph Shapiro knew that NPR destroyed the lives of many people. He
knew that NPR was responsible for destroying a humanitarian cause,
thereby destroying the chances for 10’s of thousands of children not to be
able to receive wheelchairs who are landline victims.

He knew the facts about NPR’s own in house attorney Ashley Messenger
who was also responsible for destroying innocent peoples lives, he knew
about Ashley’s deceit and blatant lies and coverups. He also knew that all
of NPR’s board members including their bosses, CEO’s Jarl Mohn, and
John Lansing, were well aware of the cruel and despicable actions, yet
when presented all the evidence and case files, as a journalist, he refused
to do anything.
Joseph Shapiro knew that 2 innocent people, who were trying to do
humanitarian work, reputations and character was ruined by NPR, and
that their lives were in danger, yet he did nothing.
He also knew there were many other peoples lives that were affected by
NPR, such as the 2 ministers reputations that had been destroyed because
of NPR’s “All Things Considered” radio broadcast, including over 30
people who were involved in this charity event.

Joseph Shapiro was also fully aware of over 4-lawsuits filed by the
Yeager’s, and because he is an “investigative journalists” he was also
fully aware of the mounds of evidence, the documents, recorded
conversations, emails between Ashley Messenger and the Yeager’s, he
was aware of NPR’s confession, admission, and their tricks to cover-up
the truth, he was also aware of the hundreds of exhibits and documents
provided in the lawsuit files.
Joeseph Shaprio was also well aware that NPR had schemed and devised
a plan to cover for their admitted mistake, (see original emails from
Messenger in case files) by offering an “opportunity” for the defamed
and destroyed person to “write your own story” yet refused the severely
damaged person the chance to address the accusations that were
broadcast around the world on the airwaves. He knew that NPR
“censored” the defamed, telling them what could be written and what
could not be written. ( email correspondence in case files)
Joeseph Shapiro knew that NPR had used censorship, he knew NPR’s
Ombudsman covered it up, and he was fully aware that this person was
severely ruined, depressed, on serious anti – depressants medications,
and tried to commit suicide twice, yet refused to interfere and stand up to
his bosses keeping his mouth shut.
Joeseph Shaprio broke everyone of the standards that are required by the
Society of Professional Journalism CODE OF ETHICS
The Society declares these four principles as the foundation of ethical
journalism and encourages their use in its practice by all people in all
media.
• Seek Truth and Report It
• Minimize Harm
• Act Independently
• Be Accountable and Transparent
These case files were all seen by the accused.
(2017-2020)
https://billyyeagervnpr.com/writ-of-certiorari/
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E9rR2KUaXzB91geqA22f
vZQZydiUW0ILxhQ8TkAUOE/edit#
He was also aware of the most recent lawsuits. (2020-2021) https://
billyyeagervnpr.com/current-lawsuits/
Joseph Shapiro was well aware (for over 4-years) of their own
organizations (NPR) dozens and multiple breach of codes and ethics that
journalist are suppose to adhere to.
NPR MOCKING JESUS CHRIST
Joseph Shapiro was also aware of NPR’s music journalist, Andrew
Flanagan, that mocked the crucifixion of Jesus on his Facebook account,
also mocking the sinners prayer “Jesus Come into my life” and changing
it to “Jesus Cum in my Mouth” posting it to his Twitter account. He was
well aware that this was the journalist that was fully responsible for
destroying all these peoples lives, and yet all of these so called
“investigative journalists” simply looked the other way.

Joseph Shapiro condoned the behavior of NPR and everyone involved,

and supported NPR in their decision to take 100’s of thousands of tax
payers money, and use it to pay 3 attorneys to fight this case of injustice
all the way to the United States Supreme Court, all under the medias
protection of “freedom of the press.”
Each of these so called “investigative journalists” reused to do anything
and instead looked the other way.
Trust these people?

I am just a drummer. But I have followed the case, read the files for 4
years, read about the coverups, and this is a story that is bigger and is
more of a public outrage story than any I have ever seen.
In my entire life, I have never witnessed a more serious case of injustice,
yet hear sits all these people with big fat paychecks, and they have
nothing to say.
In 2017 the lives of 10’s of thousands of children in 3rd world countries
were affected by the despicable actions of National Public Radio,
Andrew Flanagan, NPR General Counsel Ashley Messenger, NPR’s
CEO’s Jarl Mohn, John Lansing, attorneys David J. Bodney and Matthew
E. Kelley. (and dozens more such as all of Flanagans superiors who were
aware of the serious situation for over 3 -weeks) Ashley Messenger
QUOTE “We are taking this very serious” ( See case files and 8 part
series documentary)

Shards of the mine had blinded him torn his stomach open and had blown
off both his arms and legs. As his intestines spilled onto the ground he
was not the first in his family to die this way.
Each day, 70 people die as a result of landmines. Hundreds of thousands
of children, herding animals, planting crops or just playing, have been
killed or maimed by these deadly devices.
An estimated 100 million people around the world today are still in need
of a wheelchair, the vast majority of whom cannot get one on their own,
must use handmade wooden crutches, unless you are missing both arms
and legs, if so then you must crawl on the ground.
There are in fact children whose parents have been seriously maimed and
the only way to earn a living is to remove land mines, children do this
dangerous task, many have lost arms and legs, there are some who crawl
on the ground and remove them with their mouths.
The affordable wheelchairs made out of lawn chairs and bicycle wheels,
are shipped to those who need them worldwide.
It costs less than $60 to have each chair made, shipped and delivered to
“some of the most remote corners of the globe,” according to
Schoendorfer’s website, freewheelchairmission.org.
Husband and wife William and Anais, who are musicians, filmmakers,
artist, activist and humanitarians, wanted to do something for these
people.
For over 1 year they planned, organized and marketed a benefit concert
that was raising money to purchase those wheelchairs. I was a part of
these concerts, as a professional drummer for over 15 years, I was hired
for the charity events.

In 2016 husband and wife team William and Anais Yeager began
planning a series of musical benefit concerts to raise money for these
wheelchairs.
The event was called Mindy’s Wish.

NPR journalist Andrew Flanagan wrote an extremely defamatory article

about the Yeagers’ in March of 2017, he also took to the air-waves on
NPR’s “All Things Considered” to tell over 100 million people world
wide that the Yeager’s were nothing more than charlatans and frauds.
Mocked and insulted so badly by Flanagan, NPR readers compared
William Yeager to Charles Manson.
The Yeager’s name was destroyed so badly that their reputations were
forever ruined. Needless to say, the concerts and venue, including 1 year
of preparation that included over 30 people ( stage managers, lights and
sound, musicians, caterers, ) was permanently terminated. Yeager
became severely depressed and tried to commit suicide, NPR’s
attorneys, board members, CEO’s and all of these journalists knew, the
proof was in his wifes letter that was addressed to them, informing them
of his severe drama and mental condition.
Throughout the Federal Courts, Courts of Appeals, all the way to The
United States Supreme Court this case of injustice has been fought for
over 4 years. Over 5 lawsuits have been filed regarding this case.
The accused was fully aware that these concerts were bonafide, there
were links to the event, website including Brown Paper Tickets.
Proof
https://billyyeager.com/concert-kansas-malibu/
https://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/2596931
The Yeager’s, whose lives are destroyed because of NPR, have no
lawyer, instead they have had to fight their own case.
For NPR it has cost them nothing. Because you, me, we all . . . over 300
million Americans have paid for their attorneys with our tax dollars.
NPR has taken our American citizen tax dollars ( yes NPR is government
funded 500 million a year) and spent 100’s of thousands of dollars hiring
3 attorneys to defend their 1st Amendment Right of “freedom of the
press” defending their “right” to destroy good peoples lives. The story
William Yeager v. NPR, is being made into a feature film documentary,
with hopes to be acquired by Netflix, assuring that the American people
will learn about this travesty and about all the people who are involved in
this story.
The 8- part series about “the making” of the documentary film called
“WILLIAM YEAGER V NPR can be seen here. https://
billyyeagervnpr.com/the-making-of-the-billy-yeager-v-npr/
I learned about the Yeager’s and their mission when I read their posting
on a website, they were looking to hire professional musicians. I began
doing a little background research about Billy.
Besides being one of the most impressive guitar players I had ever heard,
I saw he had a website, that he had been discovered as a songwriter by
some very famous people, ones like Grammy Award Winner Bruce
Hornsby. From 1992- 2001 I discovered he began producing his own
films, writing, directing, casting and even acting in his films. I also
learned that several of them had won awards. I also learned that since he
met his wife, that they both embarked on a spiritual journey leaving
society and heading out into the Mojave Desert for 4 years making
another film called Jesus of Malibu.

I also learned that the Yeager’s were discovered by a producer in

Hollywood from one of their protests, and a film documentary was
produced about their lives. The film was called “The Film That Changed
The World” and it told the story about their journey and their desire to
use their talents to help those who cannot help themselves.
It won Most Inspirational Movie Award at the Red Dirt International
Film Festival.
I was excited and more so curious, and I came across another
documentary film that was all about Billy’s life, I watched it on Vimeo
and I was sold, hooked, I wanted too be part of this event.
I sent Damon Blalack ( Billy and Anais’s personal manager) files of my
drumming abilities, and after a few personal phone calls from Billy
himself, I was hired. I was then sent audio files, song arrangements, and
the overall script and breakdown of the theater play and film projection
that was to be interwoven into the concert.
Piece by piece, musician by musician, it all was coming together and
then . . .crash.
NPR’s journalist Andrew Flanagan.
Flanagan contacted no one, not Billy, not his manager or anyone of the
100’s of professional people Billy had worked with in over 40 years.
He watched none of the documentaries.
He stated that Billy in fact did not have any music videos, (this was a lie,
he did have several) he also stated that his entire website was a fraud and
fake, and that Yeager made up his entire biography and was nothing more
than an embittered, untalented nut case that was interested in nothing but
fame and infamy, and that he invested more of his energy creating scams,
bamboozles, rather than actual art and music. He stated that Billy had no
purpose in life, and that his wife married him because he was a nutcase,
Flanagan made no attempt to tell the truth, and he couldn’t.
He fabricated his entire article (in less than an hour) and then took to the
airwaves accusing Billy Yeager of something that he never had proof of,
accusing Billy of something that he didn’t do, and could never do,
because NPR’s attorneys even ADMITTED they didn’t have proof of the
accusations. (see NPR’s attorneys email admission / case files)
I also learned from watching the documentaries and reading more files
that Billy was interested in helping people throughout his life while he
was recording music and making films, such as the time he wrote a song
about a little girl called Anna.

Anna was run over by a drunk boater in Miami, her body destroyed, she
became a vegetable. Billy read about the girl, wrote and recorded a song
and sent it to the mother who thanked him in this letter.

How did I get that letter? Easy. It was included in case files, files and
dozens of exhibits that the Yeager’s had to provide to the courts to prove
what kind of reputation NPR destroyed.
I have invested literally 100’s of hours reading these cases that have
continued now for over 4 years.
More proof of good character destroyed by NPR.
Again, Billy and his wife reached out to CNN’s Hero, Krishnan. Billy
heard about the 5 star restaurant chef who gave up his career to take care
of the mentally disabled and destitute in India, wanting to help in another
fashion.

Billy custom designed these handmade flutes from PVC pipe,

scientifically tuned them to a “sacred geometric wave frequency and
vibration” and sent them to Krishnan to be given to the mentally
disabled. He included a rope to be attached, to be worn around the neck,
so as not to get lost.

The Yeager’s also included this in their exhibits in their “Motion for
Reconsideration” since the Federal Judges didn’t find the accusations and
insults unlawful enough to forward the cases to a trial.
This is because there are serious laws that protect the media, the media
(by law) is freely protected and allowed to lie and destroy peoples lives,
there is never a case of defamation that goes to court in the US. Correct
me if I am wrong. Oh yeah! Johnny Depp! Oh, forgot, that was in
LONDON!
I rest my case.
The attorneys for NPR, David J. Bodney and Matthew Kelley fought
adamantly against the Yeagers. Their phone conversations are recorded
and featured in the 8-part segment. They in fact fought so dirty, that even
though they were both well aware that Billy had been to the hospital,
emergency room, was on serious anti-depressants and PSTD
medications, it didn’t matter to the attorneys.
They made the decision to mock and defame Billy again in their motions,
sending him into deeper depression.
David Bodney fought so low as an attorney can go, that he stated in his
argument for the defense that Yeager was “nothing more than a film flam
artist.” He even tried to convince the judges that Billy had “permanently
dyed his skin black and impersonated to be Jimi Hendrix’s long lost son.”
Yet Bodney knew perfectly well that this was an outright lie and that
Billy had played a character in a film called Jimmy Story, that was in fact
a made-up character (Jimmy Story) who was pretending to be the long
lost son of Hendrix in a fictional comedy / drama film that was produced
by Billy Yeager way back in 1997.
David J. Bodney is one of the creepiest scumbags on this earth, if you
thought Jeffery Epstein is bad, check out this person.
NPR and David Bodney also fought for their right to destroyed other
innocent peoples lives that were friends and supporters of the Yeagers
such as these 2 pastors who were mocked and ridiculed by NPR’s readers
who heard the malicious accusations and took to forums, social media to
trash and accuse these two pastors of being fakes and actors.

Tim and David submitted these letters to the judges, but it didn’t matter,
the media wins.
Joeseph Shaprio also supported this.
Many of us still active as activists reach out, create videos, blogs,
articles, we want those who are responsible to be held
accountable.
Looking into the matter more carefully a trail of corruption follows.
There are dirty lawyers and their own family’s condoning this behavior,
there are editors, journalists, and people like Craig Newmark and Kelly
Mcbride, also Al Tompkins Conan Gallaty, Lori Bergen, Caryn Baird,
Baybars Örsek, and Harrison Mantas, each of them corrupt hypocrites
who knew all about this tragic event, all of these people were sent files
from the lawsuits, exhibits, videos, and excerpts from a documentary film
that covers every aspect about the details of this horrific injustice. ( links
provided below)
All of them turned their backs.
Including NPR’s top Investigative Journalists ; Mary Louise Kelly, Sacha
Pfeiffer, Joseph Shapiro, Laura Sullivan, Nancy Barnes, David
Folkenflik, and Robert Little.
What exactly was Andrew Flanagan’s agenda?
The journalist who broke the story and who destroyed the concerts
mocked Jesus Christs crucifixion in his Facebook page. He also took the
sinners prayer of “Jesus come into my life” and replaced the words with
“Jesus cum into my mouth” and this is who NPR defends for over 4
years now hiring 3 attorneys with OUR TAX DOLLARS, and all these
people know this, these screenshots from Andrew Flanagan’s twitter and
Facebook account were submitted as evidence in the case against NPR,
yet NPR’s attorney David Bodney had Flanagan remove his social media
accounts committing serious violations.
A cover-up, and proof of something very disturbing about NPR. ( watch
the 8-part series)
Joseph Shapiro has no moral values or ethics, people can know what is
right and even want to do what is right but still not act rightly, because
they are afraid. They lack the courage to support their convictions.
Coward is an adjective. It applies to one who lacks the courage to
perform a risk action or to confront a situation.
Beyond what we can feel or think there are moments when the situation
asks us to act upon something.
Not doing anything, not taking action is the best known and the most
visible form of cowardice. These are people who adopt a passive position
in most areas of their lives.
Cowardice is also evident in the lack of intervention in an external
situation, in the face of something negative that is happening to a third
party.
The Oxford English Dictionary calls cruel those persons or, by extension,
things that are “disposed to inflict suffering; indifferent to or taking
pleasure in another’s pain or distress; destitute of kindness or
compassion; merciless, pitiless, hard-hearted. Everyday sadists get
pleasure from hurting others or watching their suffering. Cowards can
never be moral, said Mohandas Gandhi.
Joseph Shapiro knew that the Yeager’s lives were destroyed by NPR and
their evil attorneys, they knew the suffering they were going through
because they all watched this video.
https://billyyeagervnpr.com/the-making-of-the-billy-yeager-v-npr/
The segments contain information about these people we intend to
expose.
They did nothing. In fact they actually supported NPR and their agenda
and still do.
I have had to wait for over 4 years for justice, learning over 40 songs and
rehearsing for months is a lot of work, I left a well paying gig to do this
benefit concert that was destroyed.
Now we will spread the truth everywhere, since the media loves the first
amendment and free speech and wants to protect it ant any cost, then let
it be fair game, all is fair in love and war isn’t it?

Boycott Joseph Shapiro make it well known.

These are evil people, all of them.

All aware, and they still hide in their closets, too afraid to come out and
address the truth, we will keep this crusade up insisting until they do
come out and take full responsibility.
Peace

Greg
Who am I? I am a drummer, have played professionally for over 25
years. I have followed this case very closely, 4 years is along time for
justice.

I also initiated this investigation and was part of a team of writers and
contributors (36 people) that wrote and published this article about the
fine details of this case.
It can be read here> https://lawsuitnprspin2018.wordpress.com/
2018/01/08/billy-yeagers-18000-00-record-album-and-400-million
dollar-lawsuits/
Recently I have invested my time reading every single document about
this case, I have also been in close contact with Damon the producer of
the film documentary.
I am aware of the contacts made (emails to Poynter, Newmark, McBride
and the rest) and those are all verified.
ALL CASE FILES ARE HERE:
https://billyyeager.com/current-lawsuits/ Sincerely Greg
Think you can sue me? ( Any of these posts: WordPress, Medium,
Facebook, RipOff Report, Blogger, Twitter, Petition.org, )
Think again.
All of this information will be posted on a site called Ripoff
Report. It has the highest search engines above anything else.
Your name will be found there, once that it IS NEVER, EVER
REMOVED!
Think you have a lawsuit, better read! Freedom of Press works both
ways, go cry to David Bodney.
From Ripoff!
The Law You Need To Know – The Communications Decency Act
Because we will not remove reports, Ripoff Report has been sued on
many occasions based on the content which our users have created and
posted. If you are considering suing Ripoff Report because of a report
which you claim is defamatory, you should be aware that to date, Ripoff
Report has never lost such a case (with one exception; explained below).
This is because of a federal law called the Communications Decency Act
or “CDA”, 47 U.S.C. § 230. Because this important law is not well
known, we want to take a moment to explain the law, and to also explain
that the filing of frivolous lawsuits can have serious consequences for
those who file them, both parties and their attorneys.
The CDA is part of our federal laws. An excellent Wikipedia article
discussing the history of the law can be found here: http://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Act
In short, the CDA provides that when a user writes and posts material on
an “interactive website” such as Ripoff Report, the site itself cannot, in
most cases, be held legally responsible for the posted material.
Specifically, 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1) states, “No provider or user of an
interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker
of any information provided by another information content provider.”
Because the reports on Ripoff Report are authored by users of the site,
we cannot be legally regarded as the “publisher or speaker” of the reports
contained here, and hence we are not liable for reports even if they
contain false or inaccurate information (NOTE: we occasionally create
editorial comments and other material, but when we do, this is clearly
marked as such). The same law applies to sites like FaceBook, MySpace,
and CraigsList – users who post information on these sites are
responsible for what they write, but the operators of the sites are not.
The reasons for this law are simple. Websites cannot possibly monitor the
accuracy of the huge volume of information which their users may
choose to post. If an angry plaintiff were permitted to hold a website
liable for information that the site did not create, this would stifle free
speech as fewer and fewer sites would be willing to permit users to post
anything at all. See generally Batzel v. Smith, 333 F.3d 1018, 1027-28
(9th Cir. 2003) (recognizing, “Making interactive computer services and
their users liable for the speech of third parties would severely restrict the
information available on the Internet. Section 230 [of the CDA] therefore
sought to prevent lawsuits from shutting down websites and other
services on the Internet.”)
Based on the protection extended by the CDA, Ripoff Report has
successfully defended more than 20 lawsuits in both state and federal
courts. Each time, the courts have consistently found that the CDA
shields Ripoff Report from any claims seeking to treat it as the speaker or
publisher of information posted by a third party.
Here are just a few recent examples:
Intellect Art Multimedia, Inc. v. Milewski, 2009 WL 2915273 (N.Y.Sup.
Sept. 11, 2009) (claims against Ripoff Report dismissed for failure to
state a claim due to CDA immunity)
GW Equity, LLC v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC, 2009 WL 62173 (N.D.Tex.
2009) (summary judgment entered in favor of Ripoff Report based on
CDA immunity)
Global Royalties, Ltd. v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC, 544 F.Supp.2d 929
(D.Ariz. 2008) (claims against Ripoff Report dismissed pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) without leave to amend based on CDA immunity)
Global Royalties, Ltd. v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC, 2007 WL 2949002
(D.Ariz. Oct. 10, 2007) (claims against Ripoff Report dismissed pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) based on CDA immunity)
Whitney Info. Network, Inc. v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC, 2008 WL
450095; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11632 (M.D.Fla. Feb. 15, 2008)
(summary judgment entered in favor of Ripoff Report based on CDA
immunity)
So, why should you care about the CDA? Well, it’s simple – if someone
posts false information about you on the Ripoff Report, the CDA
prohibits you from holding us liable for the statements which others have
written. You can always sue the author if you want, but you can’t sue
Ripoff Report just because we provide a forum for speech.
Now, to be 100% accurate – some people have said that Ripoff Report
DID lose one case in the past, and that’s technically almost true. Here’s
the deal – there was ONE case in 2003 where a predecessor website to
the Ripoff Report was sued in a foreign country and a default judgment
was entered in the plaintiff’s favor for more than $27 million “Eastern
Caribbean Dollars” (we’re not sure how much this would be in U.S.
dollars). However, when the plaintiff tried to domesticate that judgment
in the United States, we fought it. The case was resolved and the
judgment was satisfied without any money being paid. If you think this
still counts as a “loss” you’re entitled to that opinion but we don’t see it
that way. NOTE – as explained further below, a new law was enacted in
August 2010 which generally prohibits U.S. courts from honoring
foreign judgments like this.
Other websites say courts have determined Ripoff Report isn’t protected
by the CDA, who’s telling the truth?
In our opinion, the debate between Ripoff Report and our critics isn’t
even close – we give you the TRUTH and our critics don’t. Want an
example? Here’s a good one…if you find someone who claims that
courts have determined we’re not protected by the CDA, ask them these
two questions:
What’s your authority for that? AND
Are there any more recent cases which have rejected that authority?
Here’s our response to these two questions. When we try to explain what
the CDA does and does not cover, some of our less-than-honest critics
will cite two cases and claim that in those cases, the court “held” or
“found” that Ripoff Report is NOT protected by the CDA. These two
cases are MCW, Inc. v. Badbusinessbureau.com, LLC, 2004 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 6678, *(N.D.Tex. 2004), and Hy Cite Corp. v.
badbusinessbureau.com, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38082 (D.Ariz. 2005). If
you’re looking for a way to successfully sue Ripoff Report, these cases
might sound really helpful.
Trust us – they’re not. Here’s why.
Both cases involved basically the same facts – the plaintiffs alleged that
Ripoff Report itself (rather than a third party user) created false
statements about them. Based on these unproven allegations, the courts
refused to dismis the cases under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure. Does that mean we LOST the case? NO! Does that
mean the plaintiff won? NO! Does that mean the courts “held” or “ruled”
that we lost CDA immunity? NO!
Because most people reading this page are not lawyers, we need to
explain a simple point about civil lawsuits – there’s a difference between
making an allegation and proving that allegation. You can allege that
Donald Trump owes you $1 billion, but unless you have PROOF to
support that claim, Mr. Trump isn’t going to worry very much.
The decisions in both MCW and HyCite involved allegations, not proof.
What does this mean? Well, in both cases the courts refused to throw out
the cases because the judges determined that if the plaintiffs could prove
that Ripoff Report actually created the statements at issue, then the CDA
would not apply. When courts make this type of ruling at the start of a
case, it doesn’t mean the plaintiff has won or that the plaintiff is likely to
win. Rather, this type of technical legal ruling does only one thing – it
tests the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff’s claims. In so doing, the court
cannot review any evidence, and it must assume the allegations are true
even if they are not true. Based on this hypothetical, the court then
determines if those unproven allegations might support a claim IF the
plaintiff can offer evidence to prove their case.
This is why the rulings in both MCW and HyCite are basically
meaningless – the decisions were not based on any evidence, they were
merely based on unproven allegations. But don’t just take our word for it.
Look at what other judges have said in more recent decisions.
Bearing in mind that these are old cases (MCW was from 2004 and Hy
Cite was from 2005), in more recent cases judges have reviewed both
MCW and Hy Cite and found both of them to be absolutely irrelevant to
our immunity under the CDA. See GW Equity, LLC v. Xcentric
Ventures, LLC, 2009 WL 62173, *4 (N.D.Tex. 2009) (finding MCW did
not support argument that Ripoff Report was not entitled to CDA
immunity); Global Royalties, Ltd. v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC, 2007 WL
2949002 (D.Ariz. 2007) (finding plaintiff’s reliance on Hy Cite to be
“unavailing”

Posted bypaulagilmartinMay 27, 2021Posted

inUncategorizedTags:joseph shapiro npr 2021, joseph shapiro npr
2021,Leave a comment on Joseph Shapiro NPR Journalist
Coverup FraudEdit Joseph Shapiro NPR Journalist Coverup Fraud
• Home
Joseph Shapiro Journalist, Blog at WordPress.com.

• Customize
•