Synopsis
Synopsis
A
Synopsis
Submitted for the Registration of Doctor of Philosophy
In Accountancy and Law
(Commerce)
August-2019
Dayalbagh Educational Institute,
(Deemed University)
Agra
1
INTRODUCTION
The term Corporate Governance itself explain the meaning that it is an act of managing
governed. It ensures that the company works in such a manner to achieve its goal by taking into
consideration the benefit of each stakeholder including directors, shareholders, employees and
with ―problems that result from the separation of ownership and control.‖ The internal structure
of Corporate Governance includes the Board of Directors, the creation of independent audit
committees, rules for disclosure of information to shareholders and creditors and control of the
management.
MEANING OF CORPORATE
A corporation is a business entity that is owned by its shareholder(s), who elect a board of
Directors to oversee the organization‘s activities. The corporation is liable for the actions and
finances of the business – the shareholders are not. The process of capital accumulation that
facilitates development of economies by fuelling growth of its various sectors such as industry,
agriculture, infrastructure, trade and commerce has become institutionalized by the corporation.
MEANING OF GOVERNANCE
The term Governance is derived from the Latin word ―Gubernance‖ which means ―to steer‖.
Governance means the process of decision making and the process by which decisions are
There is no single definition of corporate governance which is acceptable to all people. Most of
the experts have defined Corporate Governance in their own way. Some of the popular
In the narrowest sense, Noble laureate Milton Friedman defined corporate governance as ―the
much money as possible, while conforming to the basic rules of the society embodied in law
the balance between economic and social goals and between individual and communal goals.
The governance framework is there to encourage the efficient use of resources and equally to
require accountability for the stewardship of those resources. The aim is to align as nearly as
The OECD Principles of Corporate Governance states that ―Corporate governance involves a
set of relationships between a company‘s management, its board, its shareholders and other
stakeholders. Corporate governance also provides the structure through which the objectives of
the company are set, and the means of attaining those objectives and monitoring performance
are determined.‖
Standards & Poor‘s has defined Corporate Governance as ―the way a company is organized
and managed to ensure that all financial stakeholders receive their fair share of the company‘s
The Kumar Mangalam Birla Committee constituted by SEBI has defined- ―Strong corporate
instrument of investor protection. It is the blood that fills the veins of transparent corporate
disclosure and high quality accounting practices. It is the music that moves a viable and
rights of shareholders as the true owners of the corporation and of their own role of trustees on
behalf of the shareholders. It is about commitment to values, about ethical business conduct and
3
about making a distinction between personal and corporate funds in the management of a
company.‖
capital get managers to return profits, make sure managers do not misuse the capital by
investing in bad projects, and how shareholders and creditors monitor managers‖.
The value of corporate governance lies on its four pillars, on which OECD principles of
1)
Transparency
Four Pillars of
2) Corporate 4)
Accountability Governance Responsibility
3) Fairness
1) Transparency- Companies should provide timely and accurate disclosure on all matters
guidelines of the company, effective monitoring of management and the board‘s accountability
3) Fairness- To protect the investor, to prevent the improper trading practices helpful in
developing confidence in the market. The corporate governance framework should ensure the
In the late 1980s and the early 1990s, in America there is a huge problem of scams and failures
occurring in the corporate sectors therefore to meet out these problems a committee was set up
in the year 1991 and that committee is named as ― Cadbury Committee‖. It was established by
the Financial Reporting Council, The London Stock Exchange and the Accountancy Profession
to meet out the aim of Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. The committee published its
final report on 1st December 1992. This committee includes the various aspects like- Reviewing
the structure and responsibilities of Boards of Directors and recommending a Code of Best
Practice, Considering the role of Auditors and addressing a number of recommendations to the
Accountancy Profession and Dealing with the Rights and Responsibilities of Shareholders.
The history of corporate governance in India is not very old. Until 1991, India pursued socialist
policies. It was in 1991 that the Indian government faced a fiscal deficit. The crisis led to a
series of reforms aimed at the opening up of the previously protected economy. Some reforms
were reduction in state aided financing and privatization in the various sector. Pressed by a need
to face increasing competition, Indian firms began to tap world capital markets for equity. This
growing interface with world markets led to efforts aimed at augmenting corporate governance
standards. The pioneer endeavors in this area were setting up of the Confederations of Indian
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), which was set up in 1992, constituted
two committees to focus on the issue of corporate governance. The committee chaired by
5
Kumar Mangalam Birla, chairman of the Aditya Birla Group, submitted its report in the year
2000, and the committee chaired by Narayana Murthy, founder and chief mentor of Infosys,
submitted its report in 2003. These committees played an instrumental role in laying the
foundations of corporate governance in India. They have had maximum impact on changing the
to light the fact that governance reforms are focused on two major areas—disclosure laws and
role and composition of board of directors. SEBI‘s major reforms have been orchestrated
through Clause 49 of the listing agreement. Prior to adoption of Clause 49, India corporate
governance mechanisms were not on a par with world standards. Clause 49 brought in a number
of key changes in corporate governance practices and disclosure in all listed companies. An
amendment to the Clause 49 in 2003 made it mandatory for every public company listed on
Indian stock exchange to sign the listing agreement. Clause 49 was further revised in 2004 and
came into effect in the year 2006. The main focus of the revised clause has been to protect the
Department monitors the compliance of the companies. Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement by
Securities Exchange Board of India explains on the issue of Corporate Governance and endorses
the standards under which the Companies are ordered to work. After the enactment of the new
Companies Act, 2013; Corporate Governance practices in the most reputed listed Indian
companies have been questionable on various dimensions and occasions, which required the
demand for the improvement of the quality of Corporate Governance for this purpose the Kotak
Committee has been constituted on June 2, 2017, under chairmanship of Uday Kotak. Its
companies in India. The board decided to accept several recommendations of the committee
without any modifications, these are as Reduction in the maximum number of listed entity
forum of countries describing themselves as committed to democracy and the market economy.
It gives First set of corporate governance principles in the year 1999 and a revised version was
released in 2004. To create legal and regulatory framework for corporate governance in various
countries OECD given six Principles and these Principles are- Ensuring the basis of an effective
corporate governance framework, The rights of shareholders and key ownership functions, The
services network established in the year 1845 in the United Kingdom. Deloitte is one of the "Big
Four" accounting organizations and the largest professional services network in the world by
revenue and number of professionals. Deloitte provides audit, tax, consulting, enterprise
risk and financial advisory services. Deloitte (United Kingdom) given some principles regarding
corporate governance and these are- Board leadership and company purpose, Division of
responsibilities, Composition, succession and evaluation, Audit, risk and internal control and
Remuneration.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
A Literature Review is text based knowledge which gives the critical points or idea about past
studies. Review of literatures emphasizes on what are the objectives, findings and theoretical
and methodological structure. This is the secondary source of the data and gives the relevancy
for the future study. Analysis of the review of literatures keeps the researcher knowledge up to
date on the particular topic. It provides the basis for any research area and helpful in setting the
goal of the future research. To design the Research meaningful researcher analyzes the various
10) 2011 Shanta Corporate To Evaluate The Researcher has found that
Karand governance the practices of Corporate Governance codes
Mithunsark practices in Corporate properly to bring the authenticity
er private Governance in its operations and to bring the
commercial codes by the faith of the stakeholders as well as
banks-a study Private the people of Bangladesh.
on Khulna city Commercial
Banks of
Bangladesh
3) 2017 Ms. Voluntary To examine the In this paper researcher found that
Neelam Corporate voluntary Voluntary disclosure index has
Bhardwaj Governance corporate been calculated on the basis of 33
and Dr. Practices in India governance statements, broadly 9 dimensions
Batani disclosure prescribed by voluntary
Raghaven practices followed guidelines 2009 and international
dra Rao by Indian corporate governance standards.
companies. The results of this study have
To benchmark the shown that voluntary disclosure
voluntary level is very low. As per the
corporate results of this study, although
governance voluntary corporate governance
practices of disclosure level is improving, yet
Indian companies the overall disclosure level is very
with the voluntary weak.
guidelines 2009
and International
corporate
10
governance
standards.
4) 2016 Ramendra Practices of To analyze The study concludes that overall
Kumar corporate whether ―corporate governance‖ practices
Sharma governance in ―corporate of ―IndusInd Bank ―is good. The
&Prof. IndusInd Bank governance‖ performance of bank is increasing
Rahul policies plays key year on year from 2011 -12 which
Dhaigude role in profit is a sign of good governance.
earnings of the
banks.
5) 2016 Palaniapp Relationship To identify the In this paper, statistical analyses
an G and between relationship were made to measure the
Srinivasa Corporate between corporate relationship and its impact with
Rao P V Governance governance the help of correlation and
VS Practices and disclosure regression analysis. The study
Firms practices and implied positive and significant
Performance of firms impact with the corporate
Indian Context performance with governance disclosure and firms
respect to performance of manufacturing
profitability. firms in India.
6) 2015 Meenu Corporate To examine the It is found that, HDFC Bank
Maheshw Governance role of corporate believes in adopting and adhering
ari & Practices: A governance in to the best recognized corporate
Sapna Comparative SBI & HDFC, governance practices and
verma Study which are the continuously benchmarking itself
Of SBI & HDFC part of the against each such practice.
Bank public sector and
private sector
Respectively
7) 2015 Vidhu Corporate To enhance the Researcher found in this paper,
Shekhar Governance shareholders‟ the impact of corporate
Jha and Issues, Practices value and protect governance on productivity for an
Vikas And Concerns In the interest of organization. What are the various
Mehra The Indian other stakeholders codes on corporate governance?
Context – A by enhancing the Implementation issues in the
Conceptual Study corporate context of Indian companies. The
performance and role of corporate governance in
accountability. Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs)
and the role of the apex body for
public sector enterprises in India,
8) 2014 Sonia Corporate To evaluate the In this paper, ICICI Bank has
Sharma Governance corporate complied with the requirements of
Practices: A Case governance Clause 49 of the listing
Study of ICICI practices in agreement, as far as mandatory
Bank Ltd. banking sector information is concerned. But
particularly in the more efforts should be directed
ICICI Bank Ltd towards the compliance of non-
mandatory requirements like
fixation of retirement age of the
directors, selection criterion for
non-executive and independent
directors, etc.
11
NATIONAL STUDIES
RESEARCH GAP
Earlier there have been numerous studies conducted on the Corporate Governance but no study
has been conducted on Corporate Governance Disclosure practices in FMCG sector as well as
Practices between Large - Cap FMCG Companies and Mid-Cap FMCG Companies. Most of the
but very few studies have been conducted on Non-Mandatory requirement of Corporate
Governance Practices and many aspects like- member of audit committee members, non-
executive directors, board meetings are not covered sufficiently under the previous studies.
In the last decade Corporate Frauds and Governance failure is occurring frequently
which has stolen the trust of investors thus it is require to revive the confidence of
protect the interest of investors by way of strengthening the corporate governance and
amendment of Companies Act 2013. Clause 49 has been revised as per the guidelines of
Companies Act 2013. Therefore, there is a need to study these changes related to
Corporate Governance Disclosure practices as per the revised guidelines of SEBI clause
49. Besides SEBI Clause 49, there is a need to study the other parameters of Corporate
Governance.
generating employment, increasing exports, increasing tax revenues and innovation. So,
selected Large-cap and Mid-cap companies of FMCG Sector as per selected guidelines.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
To accomplish the objectives of the study, the following research methodology will be
followed:
FMCG Sector as per selected guidelines i.e. SEBI CLAUSE 49, OECD Guidelines and
Deloitte regulation.
2. Types of Data:
Primary and Secondary data will be used for achieving the different objectives of the study.
3. Data Collection:
Primary Data- Data will be collected through Questionnaire which will be filled up by
Secondary Data- Data will be collected through Annual Reports of the selected
companies and other sources like- research papers, Journals, Magazines, Periodicals and
Newspapers.
4. Sample Size:
17
Sample size is 10 FMCG Sector companies, 5 companies are from Large – Cap i.e. Largest
Market Capitalisation and 5 companies are from mid – Cap i.e. Middle Market
Capitalisation of Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Sector. These Companies are as
following-
Selected Companies are top 5 companies in their respective sector on the basis of
6. Type of Research:
For the purpose of analysis of data, a period of five financial year from 2015-16 to 2019-20 will
8. Data analysis:
To analysis of the data different statistical and presentation tools will be used.
For the analysis of data descriptive tools like- Mean, Standard Deviation and inferential
statistical tools like- Chi-Square Test, T-test and ANOVA will be used.
18
The presentation tools will be bar diagram, pie- chart and graph.
HYPOTHESES
REFERENCES
JOURNALS
comparative study of public and private sector banks. . Global Journal of Management
Business Management and Social Sciences Research, Vol-2, ISSN No- 2319-5614, 36-
50.
20
the Nigerian Banking Sector. International Review of Business and Economics (IRBE),
34-38.
11) Kaur, J. (2011). Corporate Governance in India: Issues for Consideration. Indian
of Malawi: Evidence from Annual Reports. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking,
3528, 96-104.
21
study of SBI & HDFC bank. International Journal of Research in IT, Management and
17) Mehra, V. S. (2015). Corporate Governance Issues, Practices and Concerns in The
20) Pai, P. (2017). Corporate Governance in banks in India and Disclosure practices in
Indian Public sector and private sector banks. International Journal of Engineering
1362, 595-610.
24) Samiul Parvez Ahmed, R. Z. (2017). Corporate governance practices in the banking
sector of Bangladesh: do they really matter? . Banks and Bank Systems, Vol-12, Issue-1,
1-9.
27) Sharma, S. (2014). Corporate Governance Practices: A Case Study of ICICI Bank Ltd.
9725, 348-363.
28) Shukla, H. J. (2009). Corporate Governance and Indian FMCG Industry. The IUP
89-106.
within Banking Sector(Private, Public and Foreign Banks): An empirical review. Asian
31) Vartak, P. (2018). Corporate Governance: A Literature Review with a Focus on Public
Evidencefrom Barbados. Social and Economic Studies 63: Vol-3, Issue-4, ISSN: 0037-
7651 , 307-341.
23
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
4) Williams, A. (2007). Corporate Governance - Who will guide the guardians? Mumbai:
WEBSITES
1) BAJAJ. (2019, FEBRUARY 11). BAJAJ CORP. Retrieved from BAJAJ CORP.
INDIA: http://www.bajajcorp.com/
BRITANNIA.CO.IN: http://britannia.co.in/about-us/overview
COLPAL: https://www.colgatepalmolive.co.in/
4) DABUR INDIA LTD. (2019, AUGUST 5). Retrieved AUGUST 5, 2019, from
dabur.com: https://www.dabur.com/
https://www.deloitte.com/in/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/about-deloitte.html
http://www.emamigroup.com/emami-fmcg
https://india-consumer.gsk.com/
10) HUL. (2019, JANUARY 16). HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED. Retrieved from
HUL.CO.IN: https://www.hul.co.in/
11) ICMAI. (2019, March 1). ICMAI. Retrieved from ICMAI.IN: www.icmai.in
12) ITC. (2019, MARCH 4). ITC. Retrieved from ITC: https://www.itcportal.com/
13) IUP. (2019, March 3). IUP JOURNAL. Retrieved from Iup: https://www.iupindia.in
15) MARICO. (2019, FEBRUARY 18). MARICO INDIA. Retrieved from MARICO:
https://marico.com/india/about-us/overview
16) MCA. (2018, December 29). MCA. Retrieved from MCA GOV.:
http://www.mca.gov.in/MCASearch/search_table.html
17) NESTLE. (2019, FEBRUARY 9). NESTLE. Retrieved from NESTLE INDIA:
https://www.nestle.in/
18) OECD. (2019, JUNE 10). OECD. Retrieved JUNE 18, 2019, from OECD:
oecd.org/corporate/corporate-governance-factbook.htm
19) SEBI. (2019, MARCH 5). SEBI. Retrieved from SEBI: https://www.sebi.gov.in/
HEAD
Prof. Pramod Kumar
Department of Accountancy & Law
DEAN
Faculty of Commerce
Dayalbagh Educational Institute
Agra.