Malaria Paper 2 MANGOLD
Malaria Paper 2 MANGOLD
Malaria Paper 2 MANGOLD
5
0095-1137/05/$08.00⫹0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.5.2435–2440.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Rapid and accurate detection of malaria parasites in blood is needed to institute proper therapy. We
developed and used a real-time PCR assay to detect and distinguish four Plasmodium spp. that cause human
disease by using a single amplification reaction and melting curve analysis. Consensus primers were used to
amplify a species-specific region of the multicopy 18S rRNA gene, and SYBR Green was used for detection in
a LightCycler instrument. Patient specimens infected at 0.01 to 0.02% parasitemia densities were detected, and
analytical sensitivity was estimated to be 0.2 genome equivalent per reaction. Melting curve analysis based on
nucleotide variations within the amplicons provided a basis for accurate differentiation of Plasmodium falci-
parum, P. vivax, P. ovale, and P. malariae. For assay validation, 358 patient blood samples from the National
University Hospital in Singapore and Evanston Northwestern Healthcare in Illinois were analyzed. Of 76
blinded patient samples with a microscopic diagnosis of P. falciparum, P. vivax, or P. ovale infection, 74 (97.4%)
were detected by real-time PCR, including three specimens containing mixed P. falciparum-P. vivax infections.
No Plasmodium DNA was amplified in any of the 82 specimens sent for malaria testing but that were
microscopically negative for Plasmodium infection. In addition, 200 blood samples from patients whose blood
was collected for reasons other than malaria testing were also determined to be negative by real-time PCR.
Real-time PCR with melting curve analysis could be a rapid and objective supplement to the examination of
Giemsa-stained blood smears and may replace microscopy following further validation.
Malaria remains a global concern. The World Health Orga- chromatographic assays based on antigen detection have been
nization estimates 300 to 500 million cases of malaria infec- developed but are also relatively insensitive in cases of low
tions resulting in over one million deaths occurring globally parasitemia (22, 24, 30). In addition, antigenemia may persist
each year. Although the vast majority of these cases are found weeks beyond the actual infection, leading to the false diagno-
in the 100 countries in the tropical regions of Africa, Asia, sis of malaria parasitemia (6, 22). Molecular detection for
Central and South Americas where the disease is endemic, the Plasmodium diagnosis using PCR has resulted in increased
mobile nature of today’s society results in ca. 1,400 cases of sensitivity and species discrimination compared to either mi-
imported malaria reported each year in the United States as a croscopic or immunochromatographic diagnosis of malaria (2,
result of international travel, immigration, and military service 4, 12, 14, 22, 23, 25, 27). However, most published PCR assays
(10). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recom- are gel based with (4, 5, 15) or without (2, 3, 9, 23, 25–27, 29,
mends that malaria should be considered in the differential 31, 35, 36) subsequent probe hybridizations, resulting in a
diagnosis of febrile patients who have traveled to a region lengthy procedure not optimal for clinical use. The need for a
where malaria is endemic and in any patients who experience more sensitive and time-efficient assay has led to the develop-
fevers of unknown origin regardless of their travel history (10). ment of molecular assays involving real-time PCR (7, 8, 13,
Provision of these diagnostic services and maintenance of com- 18). Real-time PCR assays have the potential to detect low
petency may pose a challenge to many laboratories. levels of parasitemia, identify mixed infections, and allow for
Species differentiation of Plasmodium is essential for select- precise differentiation of species via melting curve analysis. In
ing the proper treatment. Especially important is differentiat- the present study, we developed and validated a real-time PCR
ing P. falciparum from the others, since this species is respon- assay to detect and identify Plasmodium spp. in a single reac-
sible for ca. 95% of the deaths due to malaria (33). The current tion by using a simple collection method consisting of blood
standard for diagnosis is the microscopic examination of Gi- spotted on treated filter paper.
emsa-stained thick and thin blood smears (12, 16, 21, 22, 28). (This research was presented in part at the 43rd Interscience
This procedure is time-consuming to prepare, read, and inter- Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chi-
pret the slides. Previous studies have shown that even with cago, Ill., 14 to 17 September 2003, and at the annual meeting
experienced microscopists, misdiagnosis occurs, particularly in of the Association for Molecular Pathology, Orlando, Fla., 22
cases of mixed infection or low parasitemia (12, 28). Immuno- November 2003.)
2435
2436 MANGOLD ET AL. J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.
TABLE 1. Comparison of results between the original microscopic cation was immediately followed by a melt program consisting of 2 min at 95°C,
diagnoses and the microscopic review of a blinded 2 min at 68°C, and a stepwise temperature increase of 0.2°C/s until 90°C, with
subgroup containing discrepant cases fluorescence acquisition at each temperature transition. The fluorescence data
were analyzed by using F1/F2 settings, which improved the detection of P. fal-
Original Final microscopic diagnosis (no. of specimens)a ciparum, and a cutoff of 35 cycles was used to define Plasmodium-positive sam-
microscopic ples in the present study. This assay for Plasmodium species differentiation
diagnosis P. falciparum P. malariae P. ovale P. vivax Negative
required ca. 1 h to complete, in addition to the sample preparation time. Melt
P. falciparum 34ⴱ 0 0 2 0 curve analysis was used to determine the species-specific mean melting temper-
P. malariae 0 0 0 2 0 ature (Tm) based on values determined from the respective plasmid controls.
P. ovale 0 0 1 0 0
P. vivax 0 0 0 40ⴱ 0
Negative 0 0 0 0 82 RESULTS
ysis identified P. falciparum, P. vivax, or P. ovale in 74 (97.4%) using the standard ISOCODE card procedure, PCR amplifi-
of these specimens, including 3 that contained a dual infection cation, and melting curve identification of Plasmodium spp.,
with P. falciparum and P. vivax, for which only 1 had been was completed in less than 3 h. This real-time PCR assay for
microscopically identified as such. Since it is often difficult to the detection and identification of Plasmodium spp. can be
diagnose mixed infections by microscopy, the distinct dual used to confirm microscopic findings and in many settings can
peaks observed in Fig. 5 indicate that the real-time PCR assay be used for the primary identification of an infected patient
may be more accurate than the gold standard of microscopy in without the need for multiple blood specimens or even micro-
these two cases. To date, only a single patient with a P. ovale scopic analysis.
infection had been identified by microscopy and real-time
PCR. Of the two specimens microscopically diagnosed as con- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
taining P. falciparum that did not produce a positive result for We acknowledge the assistance of Kevin S. W. Tan, Department
any Plasmodium infection in the real-time PCR assay, the of Microbiology, National University of Singapore; May Ann Lee,
amount of parasitemia in these samples was ca. 0.01%, at the Defense Ministry Research Institute, Singapore; and Thiha Nyunt,
Yangon, Myanmar, in obtaining the patient blood specimens used in
lower threshold of sensitivity for this assay. In both cases, the this study. We appreciate the time-consuming microscopic analysis
blood had been stored for several days before aliquots were performed by Linda Kuksuk of Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chi-
spotted onto the ISOCODE cards. It is also possible that the cago, Ill. We also acknowledge the technical assistance of Wooi Loon
sensitivity of the assay was decreased by the delay in specimen Ng and Mui Joo Khoo of National University Hospital, Singapore.
This study was funded by the Department of Pathology and Labo-
preparation, in spite of using the Puregene procedure. ratory Medicine at Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, Ill.
Of the 74 infected specimens detected by both microscopy
and real-time PCR, 4 had discrepant species identification REFERENCES
based on the initial microscopic analysis. Two specimens 1. Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller,
and D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation
with P. malariae and two with P. falciparum, as originally de- of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389–3402.
termined by microscopic analysis, were all identified as P. vivax 2. Alves, F. P., R. R. Durlacher, M. J. Menezes, H. Krieger, L. H. Silva, and
E. P. Camargo. 2002. High prevalence of asymptomatic Plasmodium vivax
positive by the real-time PCR assay. GenBank sequence com- and Plasmodium falciparum infections in native Amazonian populations.
parisons and the results of preliminary testing using ATCC Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 66:641–648.
controls would suggest that misidentification of either P. fal- 3. Bottius, E., A. Guanzirolli, J. F. Trape, C. Rogier, L. Konate, and P. Druilhe.
1996. Malaria: even more chronic in nature than previously thought; evi-
ciparum or P. malariae as P. vivax is unlikely using this se- dence for subpatent parasitaemia detectable by the polymerase chain reac-
quence-based assay and may indicate an inaccurate micro- tion. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 90:15–19.
scopic diagnosis. The four discrepant specimens were included 4. Brown, A. E., K. C. Kain, J. Pipithkul, and H. K. Webster. 1992. Demon-
stration by the polymerase chain reaction of mixed Plasmodium falciparum
in a blinded group reviewed by a panel of experienced micros- and P. vivax infections undetected by conventional microscopy. Trans. R.
copists. The results of this second review were in agreement Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 86:609–612.
5. Ciceron, L., G. Jaureguiberry, F. Gay, and M. Danis. 1999. Development of
with the real-time PCR results, indicating the real-time PCR a Plasmodium PCR for monitoring efficacy of antimalarial treatment. J. Clin.
assay may provide accurate identification of Plasmodium spp. Microbiol. 37:35–38.
when the microscopic analysis is uncertain. 6. Craig, M. H., B. L. Bredenkamp, C. H. Williams, E. J. Rossouw, V. J. Kelly,
I. Kleinschmidt, A. Martineau, and G. F. Henry. 2002. Field and laboratory
Recently, P. knowlesi, a species that is morphologically sim- comparative evaluation of ten rapid malaria diagnostic tests. Trans. R. Soc.
ilar to P. malariae has been identified as a human pathogen in Trop. Med. Hyg. 96:258–265.
patients from Malaysia (32). Sequence analysis indicates that 7. de Monbrison, F., C. Angei, A. Staal, K. Kaiser, and S. Picot. 2003. Simul-
taneous identification of the four human Plasmodium species and quantifi-
this species should also be amplified by using the conserved cation of Plasmodium DNA load in human blood by real-time polymerase
primers described in this assay. Whether the differences in chain reaction. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 97:387–390.
8. Farcas, G. A., K. J. Zhong, T. Mazzulli, and K. C. Kain. 2004. Evaluation of
sequence composition between the primers are sufficient to the RealArt Malaria LC real-time PCR assay for malaria diagnosis. J. Clin.
result in a Tm closer to that of P. vivax than to P. malariae needs Microbiol. 42:636–638.
to be determined by testing confirmed P. knowlesi specimens. 9. Filisetti, D., S. Bombard, C. NⴕGuiri, R. Dahan, B. Molet, A. Abou-Bacar, Y.
Hansmann, D. Christmann, and E. Candolfi. 2002. Prospective assessment
A drawback common to all DNA-based malaria assays is the of a new polymerase chain reaction target (STEVOR) for imported Plas-
real possibility of detecting persistent DNA in the bloodstream modium falciparum malaria. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21:679–681.
after the infection has subsided. Several studies reported the 10. Filler, S., L. M. Causer, R. D. Newman, A. M. Barber, J. M. Roberts, J.
MacArthur, M. E. Parise, and R. W. Steketee. 2003. Malaria surveillance–
posttreatment detection of Plasmodium DNA up to 4 days United States, 2001. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 52:1–16.
after microscopic detection (4, 25), and another purports that 11. Gardner, M. J., N. Hall, E. Fung, O. White, M. Berriman, R. W. Hyman,
J. M. Carlton, A. Pain, K. E. Nelson, S. Bowman, I. T. Paulsen, K. James,
detection at 5 to 8 days after initiation of treatment indicates J. A. Eisen, K. Rutherford, S. L. Salzberg, A. Craig, S. Kyes, M. S. Chan, V.
therapeutic failure, possibly due to parasite resistance (17). Nene, S. J. Shallom, B. Suh, J. Peterson, S. Angiuoli, M. Pertea, J. Allen, J.
However, this persistence of Plasmodium DNA is still less than Selengut, D. Haft, M. W. Mather, A. B. Vaidya, D. M. Martin, A. H. Fair-
lamb, M. J. Fraunholz, D. S. Roos, S. A. Ralph, G. I. McFadden, L. M.
the persistent antigenemia reported with immunochromato- Cummings, G. M. Subramanian, C. Mungall, J. C. Venter, D. J. Carucci,
graphic assays (6, 22). Also, DNA-based molecular assays have S. L. Hoffman, C. Newbold, R. W. Davis, C. M. Fraser, and B. Barrell. 2002.
demonstrated a possible chronic detection in regions of the Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum.
Nature 419:498–511.
world where malaria is endemic, which may be due to very low 12. Hanscheid, T. 2003. Current strategies to avoid misdiagnosis of malaria.
parasitemias in immune individuals (3, 19, 34). Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 9:497–504.
13. Hermsen, C. C., D. S. Telgt, E. H. Linders, L. A. van de Locht, W. M. Eling,
In the present study, we developed and validated a real-time E. J. Mensink, and R. W. Sauerwein. 2001. Detection of Plasmodium falci-
PCR assay that can accurately detect and identify Plasmodium parum malaria parasites in vivo by real-time quantitative PCR. Mol. Bio-
spp. in a single reaction by using a simple method for sample chem. Parasitol. 118:247–251.
14. Jerrard, D. A., J. S. Broder, J. R. Hanna, J. E. Colletti, K. A. Grundmann,
collection consisting of blood spotted on treated filter paper A. J. Geroff, and A. Mattu. 2002. Malaria: a rising incidence in the United
(Table 3). The entire process, including specimen preparation States. J. Emerg. Med. 23:23–33.
2440 MANGOLD ET AL. J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.
15. Kain, K. C., A. E. Brown, L. Mirabelli, and H. K. Webster. 1993. Detection 28. Payne, D. 1988. Use and limitations of light microscopy for diagnosing
of Plasmodium vivax by polymerase chain reaction in a field study. J. Infect. malaria at the primary health care level. Bull. W. H. O. 66:621–626.
Dis. 168:1323–1326. 29. Perandin, F., N. Manca, G. Piccolo, A. Calderaro, L. Galati, L. Ricci, M. C.
16. Kain, K. C., M. A. Harrington, S. Tennyson, and J. S. Keystone. 1998. Medici, C. Arcangeletti, G. Dettori, and C. Chezzi. 2003. Identification of
Imported malaria: prospective analysis of problems in diagnosis and man- Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale, and P. malariae and detection of
agement. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27:142–149. mixed infection in patients with imported malaria in Italy. New Microbiol.
17. Kain, K. C., D. E. Kyle, C. Wongsrichanalai, A. E. Brown, H. K. Webster, S. 26:91–100.
Vanijanonta, and S. Looareesuwan. 1994. Qualitative and semiquantitative 30. Rubio, J. M., I. Buhigas, M. Subirats, M. Baquero, S. Puente, and A. Benito.
polymerase chain reaction to predict Plasmodium falciparum treatment fail-
2001. Limited level of accuracy provided by available rapid diagnosis tests for
ure. J. Infect. Dis. 170:1626–1630.
malaria enhances the need for PCR-based reference laboratories. J. Clin.
18. Lee, M. A., C. H. Tan, L. T. Aw, C. S. Tang, M. Singh, S. H. Lee, H. P. Chia,
Microbiol. 39:2736–2737.
and E. P. Yap. 2002. Real-time fluorescence-based PCR for detection of
malaria parasites. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4343–4345. 31. Rubio, J. M., R. J. Post, W. M. van Leeuwen, M. C. Henry, G. Lindergard,
19. Lee, S. H., U. A. Kara, E. Koay, M. A. Lee, S. Lam, and D. Teo. 2002. New and M. Hommel. 2002. Alternative polymerase chain reaction method to
strategies for the diagnosis and screening of malaria. Int. J. Hematol. identify Plasmodium species in human blood samples: the seminested mul-
76(Suppl. 1):291–293. tiplex malaria PCR (SnM-PCR). Trans R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 96(Suppl.
20. McCutchan, T. F., J. Li, G. A. McConkey, M. J. Rogers, and A. P. Waters. 1):S199–S204.
1995. The cytoplasmic rRNAs of Plasmodium spp. Parasitology Today 11: 32. Singh, B., L. Kim Sung, A. Matusop, A. Radhakrishnan, S. S. Shamsul, J.
134–138. Cox-Singh, A. Thomas, and D. J. Conway. 2004. A large focus of naturally
21. Milne, L. M., M. S. Kyi, P. L. Chiodini, and D. C. Warhurst. 1994. Accuracy acquired Plasmodium knowlesi infections in human beings. Lancet 363:1017–
of routine laboratory diagnosis of malaria in the United Kingdom. J. Clin. 1024.
Pathol. 47:740–742. 33. Stoppacher, R., and S. P. Adams. 2003. Malaria deaths in the United States:
22. Moody, A. 2002. Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria parasites. Clin. Microbiol. case report and review of deaths, 1979–1998. J. Forensic Sci. 48:404–408.
Rev. 15:66–78. 34. Tham, J. M., S. H. Lee, T. M. Tan, R. C. Ting, and U. A. Kara. 1999.
23. Morassin, B., R. Fabre, A. Berry, and J. F. Magnaval. 2002. One year’s Detection and species determination of malaria parasites by PCR: compar-
experience with the polymerase chain reaction as a routine method for the ison with microscopy and with ParaSight-F and ICT malaria Pf tests in a
diagnosis of imported malaria. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 66:503–508.
clinical environment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1269–1273.
24. Murray, C. K., D. Bell, R. A. Gasser, and C. Wongsrichanalai. 2003. Rapid
35. Zaman, S., L. Tan, H. H. Chan, L. Aziz, S. Abdul-Samat, R. Wahid, A.
diagnostic testing for malaria. Trop. Med. Int. Health 8:876–883.
25. Myjak, P., W. Nahorski, N. J. Pieniazek, and H. Pietkiewicz. 2002. Useful- Kamal, M. Ahmed, and V. Zaman. 2001. The detection of Plasmodium
ness of PCR for diagnosis of imported malaria in Poland. Eur. J. Clin. falciparum and P. vivax in DNA-extracted blood samples using polymerase
Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21:215–218. chain reaction. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 95:391–397.
26. Padley, D., A. H. Moody, P. L. Chiodini, and J. Saldanha. 2003. Use of a 36. Zhou, M., Q. Liu, C. Wongsrichanalai, W. Suwonkerd, K. Panart, S. Pra-
rapid, single-round, multiplex PCR to detect malarial parasites and identify jakwong, A. Pensiri, M. Kimura, H. Matsuoka, M. U. Ferreira, S. Isomura,
the species present. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 97:131–137. and F. Kawamoto. 1998. High prevalence of Plasmodium malariae and Plas-
27. Patsoula, E., G. Spanakos, D. Sofianatou, M. Parara, and N. C. Vakalis. modium ovale in malaria patients along the Thai-Myanmar border, as re-
2003. A single-step, PCR-based method for the detection and differentiation vealed by acridine orange staining and PCR-based diagnoses. Trop. Med.
of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 97:15–21. Int. Health 3:304–312.