Pertemuan 13 - Multi Stage Refrigeration Cycle - Lanjutan
Pertemuan 13 - Multi Stage Refrigeration Cycle - Lanjutan
Pertemuan 13 - Multi Stage Refrigeration Cycle - Lanjutan
Advanced Refrigeration
Cycles and Systems
5.1 Introduction
Refrigeration cycles covered in Chapter 4 are simple and extensively used in most of the refrig-
eration needs encountered in practice. Household refrigerators, small coolers, and air-conditioning
systems are some examples. For other refrigeration applications, the simple vapor-compression cycle
may not be suitable and more advanced and innovative refrigeration systems may have to be used.
Other motivations include the search for improved performance and efficiency as well as require-
ments to achieve very low temperatures. In this chapter, we cover some advanced refrigeration
systems as well as special systems used in certain applications.
5 4 4
Condenser Log P (kPa)
T
Expansion
High-pressure 5
valve
6 compressor 2
9 5 4
Flash 7 9
intercooler 3 6 3 6 3
7 2
2
7 Low-pressure 1
Expansion compressor 8 1
valve 8
8 Evaporator 1
4
s h (kJ/kg)
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 5.1 (a) A two-stage vapor-compression refrigeration system, (b) its T −s diagram, and (c) its log P −h
diagram.
Figure 5.1 shows a schematic diagram of a two-stage vapor-compression refrigeration unit that
can provide temperatures below −30 ◦ C (approximately to −50 ◦ C), and its T −s diagram. This
system also uses an intercooler with air.
As an example, three-stage refrigeration systems can provide an evaporator temperature of
−100 ◦ C. In the two-stage unit shown, the refrigerant is compressed in the first stage and, after
being de-superheated by an intercooler, is further compressed in the second stage. An intercooler is
used in between the two compression stages for reducing the compression work. In other words, a
booster (first-stage) compressor and a gas–liquid intercooler are attached to the single-stage cycle.
The intercooler subcools the refrigerant liquid supplied to the evaporator by vaporizing a portion
of the refrigerant after the first throttling stage. The flash gas returns at an intermediate point in
the compression process in order to improve the compression efficiency by cooling the superheated
gas. Not only a single compressor but a set of compressors is also required to be used in each stage,
depending on the capacity and temperature. In large systems with a number of evaporators and
large compression (temperature) ratios, the number of intercoolers and compression stages yields
increased system efficiency and hence increased coefficient of performance (COP).
Figure 5.2 A cascade refrigeration system utilizing CO2 as low-pressure stage refrigerant and ammonia as
the high-pressure stage refrigerant (operating at about −50 ◦ C), skid for a 100 ton/day CO2 liquefaction plant
(Courtesy of Salof Refrigeration Co., Inc.).
Conventional single compressor, mechanical refrigeration system condensing units are capa-
ble of achieving temperatures of about −40 ◦ C. If lower temperatures are required then cascade
refrigeration systems must be used. A two-stage cascade system uses two refrigeration systems
connected in series to achieve temperatures of around −85 ◦ C. There are single compressor sys-
tems that can achieve temperatures colder than −100 ◦ C but they are not widely used. These systems
are sometimes referred to as autocascading systems. The main disadvantage of such systems is
that it requires the use of a proprietary blend of refrigerant. This characteristic results in three
service-related problems:
• A leak in the system can easily cause the loss of only some of the refrigerant making up the
blend (since the refrigerant blend is made up of different types of refrigerant with different
boiling points), resulting in an imbalance in the ratio of the remaining refrigerants. To return the
system to proper operation, all of the remaining refrigerant must be replaced with a new and
potentially costly charge to ensure a proper blend ratio.
• The blend is proprietary and may not be readily available from the traditional refrigerant supply
sources and therefore may be hard to obtain and costly.
• These types of cascade systems are not widely used; it is hard to find well-qualified field service
staff who are familiar with repair and maintenance procedures.
Of course, these and other issues can cause undesirable expense and downtime.
A
Evaporator
D
Condenser
B
Condenser TEV
Bypass valve
evaporator
Heat
exchanger
1 2
QH
Condenser Decrease in Log P (kPa)
7 6 T
Expansion Compressor compressor
I w2 work
valve
Heat exchanger QH
8 Evaporator 5
6 5 4
7
Heat
I 2
Condenser 2 8 6 3
3 3 7 2
w1 5
Expansion
II II
valve 8
Compressor 1 1
4 Q
Evaporator Increase in refrigeration capacity
4 1 s
QL h (kJ/kg)
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 5.4 (a) Schematic of a two-stage (binary) cascade refrigeration system, (b) its T–s diagram, and (c) its
log P –h diagram. [Adapted from Cengel and Boles (2008).]
For a schematic system shown in Figure 5.4, the condenser of system I, called the first or high-
pressure stage, is usually fan cooled by the ambient air. In some cases a water supply may be used,
but air cooling is much more common. The evaporator of system I is used to cool the condenser of
system II called the second or low-pressure stage. The unit that makes up the evaporator of system I
and the condenser of system II is often referred to as the inter-stage or cascade condenser . As stated
earlier, cascade systems generally use two different refrigerants (i.e., one in each stage). One type
is used for the low stage and a different one for the high stage. The reason why two refrigeration
systems are used is that a single system cannot economically achieve the high compression ratios
Advanced Refrigeration Cycles and Systems 223
necessary to obtain the proper evaporating and condensing temperatures. It is clear from the T −s
diagram of the two-stage cascade refrigeration system, as shown in Figure 5.4, that the compressor
work decreases and the amount of refrigeration load (capacity) in the evaporator increases as a
result of cascading (Cengel and Boles, 2008). Therefore, cascading improves the COP.
Example 5.1
Consider a two-stage cascade refrigeration system operating between the pressure limits of 1.6 MPa
and 180 kPa with refrigerant-134a as the working fluid (Figure 5.5). Heat rejection from the lower
cycle to the upper cycle takes place in an adiabatic counter-flow heat exchanger where the pressure
in the upper and lower cycles are 0.4 and 0.5 MPa, respectively. In both cycles, the refrigerant
is a saturated liquid at the condenser exit and a saturated vapor at the compressor inlet, and the
isentropic efficiency of the compressor is 85%. If the mass flow rate of the refrigerant through the
lower cycle is 0.07 kg/s, (a) draw the temperature–entropy diagram of the cycle indicating pressures;
determine (b) the mass flow rate of the refrigerant through the upper cycle, (c) the rate of heat
removal from the refrigerated space, and (d) the COP of this refrigerator; and (e) determine the
rate of heat removal and the COP if this refrigerator operated on a single-stage cycle between the
same pressure limits with the same compressor efficiency. Also, take the mass flow rate of R-134a
through the cycle to be 0.07 kg/s.
QH
Condenser
7
6
W
Compressor
8 5
Evaporator
Condenser
3
2
W
Compressor
4 1
Evaporator
QL
Figure 5.5 Schematic of two-stage cascade refrigeration system considered in Example 5.1.
224 Refrigeration Systems and Applications
Solution
(a) Noting that compression processes are not isentropic, the temperature–entropy diagram of the
cycle can be drawn as shown in Figure 5.6.
T
1.6 MPa
· 6
QH
0.5 MPa
7 · 0.4 MPa
W
A 2
0.5 MPa
3 ·
W 0.18 MPa
8 B 5
1
4 ·
QL
s
(b) The properties are to be obtained from the refrigerant-134a tables (Tables B.3 through B.5):
The mass flow rate of the refrigerant through the upper cycle is determined from an energy
balance on the heat exchanger.
ṁA (h5 − h8 ) = ṁB (h2 − h3 )
ṁA (255.55 − 135.93) kJ/kg = (0.07 kg/s)(267.57 − 73.33) kJ/kg −→ ṁA = 0.1137 kg/s
(c) The rate of heat removal from the refrigerated space is
Q̇L = ṁB (h1 − h4 ) = (0.07 kg/s)(242.86 − 73.33) kJ/kg = 11.87 kW
(d) The power input and the COP are
Ẇ = ṁA (h6 − h5 ) + ṁB (h2 − h1 )
= (0.1137 kg/s)(289.28−255.55) kJ/kg + (0.07 kg/s)(267.57−242.86) kJ/kg = 5.56 kW
Q̇L 11.87
COP = = = 2.13
Ẇ 5.56
(e) If this refrigerator operated on a single-stage cycle (Figure 5.7) between the same pressure
limits, we would have
h1 = hg@180 kPa = 242.86 kJ/kg
s1 = sg@180 kPa = 0.9397 kJ/kg · K
P2 = 1600 kPa
h2s = 288.52 kJ/kg
s2 = s1
h2s − h1
ηC =
h2 − h1
288.52 − 242.86
0.85 = −→ h2 = 296.58 kJ/kg
h2 − 242.86
h3 = hf @1600 kPa = 135.93 kJ/kg
h4 = h3 = 135.93 kJ/kg
Q̇L = ṁ(h1 − h4 ) = (0.07 kg/s)(242.86 − 135.93) kJ/kg = 7.49 kW
Ẇ = ṁ(h2 − h1 ) = (0.07 kg/s)(296.58 − 242.86) kJ/kg = 3.76 kW
Q̇L 7.49
COP = = = 1.99
Ẇ 3.76
T 2
2s
·
QH ·
W
1.6 MPa
3
0.18 MPa
· 1
4
QL
Figure 5.7 T–s diagram of the single-stage cycle considered in part (d) of Example 5.1.
226 Refrigeration Systems and Applications
Cooling
water
or air
Q4
Propane W3
Q3
Gas at
−37 °C W2
Ethane
Q ′2
Q2
Liquefied gas at
Methane W1 −82 °C
Q1
Liquefied storage at
−157 °C