HW 4

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

8-12. c.

This is a filter rule, a classic technical trading rule, which would appear to
contradict the weak form of the efficient market hypothesis.

8-13. c. The P/E ratio is public information so this observation would provide
evidence against the semi-strong form of the efficient market theory.

CFA8-1 b.
Public information constitutes semi-string efficiency, while the addition of private
information leads to strong form efficiency.
CFA8-2 a.
The information should be absorbed instantly.
CFA8-4 c.
Stocks producing abnormal excess returns will increase in price to eliminate the
positive alpha.
CFA8-5 c.
A random walk reflects no other information and is thus random.
CFA8-6 d.
Unexpected results are by definition an anomaly.

4-11. The offering price includes a 6% front-end load, or sales commission,


meaning that every dollar paid results in only $0.94 going toward the purchase of
NAV $ 10 .70
=
shares. Therefore: Offering price = 1−load 1−0 . 06 =$11.38
4-13
Given that net asset value equals assets minus liabilities expressed on a per-share
basis, we first add up the value of the shares to get the market value of the portfolio:
Stock Value Held by
Fund
A $ 7,000,000
B 12,000,000
C 8,000,000
D 15,000,000
Total $42,000,000

knowing that the accrued management fee, which adjusts the value of the portfolio,
totals $30,000, and the number of the shares outstanding is 4,000,000, we can use
the NAV equation:
Net asset value=Market value of assets - Market value of liabilities =
S h ares outstanding
$ 42,000 ,000−$30,000
4,000 ,000 = $10.49

4-14 The value of stocks sold and replaced = $15,000,000.

Turnover rate = The value of stocks sold and replaced = $15,000,000.

Turnover rate = Value of stocks sold or replaced


Value of assets
$15,000,000
= $ 42,000,000 = 0.3571 = 35.71%

4-26.
a. After two years, each dollar invested in a fund with a 4% load and a portfolio
return equal to r will grow to: $0.96  (1 + r – 0.005)^2
Each dollar invested in the bank CD will grow to: $1 (1.06)^2
If the mutual fund is to be the better investment, then the portfolio return, r, must
satisfy:
0.96  (1 + r – 0.005)2 > (1.06)2
0.96  (1 + r – 0.005)2 > 1.1236
(1 + r – 0.005)2 > 1.1704
1 + r – 0.005 > 1.0819
1 + r > 1.0869
Therefore, r > 0.0869 = 8.69%
b. If you invest for six years, then the portfolio return must satisfy:
0.96 (1 + r –0.005)^6 > (1.06)^6 = 1.4185
(1 + r – 0.005)^6 > 1.4776
1 + r – 0.005 > 1.0672
1 + r > 1.0722
r > 7.22%
The cutoff rate of return is lower for the six year investment because the "fixed cost"
(i.e., the one-time front-end load) is spread out over a greater number of years.
c.
i. With a 12b-1 fee instead of a front-end load, the portfolio must earn a rate of
return (r) that satisfies:
1 + r – 0.005 – 0.0075 > 1.06
ii. In this case, r must exceed 7.25% regardless of the investment horizon.

You might also like