Electrical Metodology
Electrical Metodology
Electrical Metodology
Abstract
This electrical methodology explains the electrical calculations that the software does throughout
the PV plant. It also explains the different criteria of each of the electrical cabling standards that
pvDesign offers. The following topics are introduced in the methodology:
• The calculation of the maximum and minimum number of modules per string.
• The types of PV plant electrical configurations that pvDesign offers.
• The sizing of the equipment’s protective devices such as fuses and breakers.
• The model that has been followed to size cables according to IEC and NEC standards.
Electrical Methodology 1
Contents
Contents
Abstract 1
Bibliography 29
Electrical Methodology 2
Contents
Electrical Methodology 3
List of Figures
List of Figures
1.1 Maximum number of modules per string with module temperature from -10 ºC
to -8 ºC. Source: Own elaboration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.2 Maximum number of modules per string with module temperature from 5 ºC to
7 ºC. Source: Own elaboration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.3 Maximum number of modules per string with module temperature from 10 ºC to
12 ºC. Source: Own elaboration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.4 Maximum number of modules per string with module temperature from 20 ºC to
22 ºC. Source: Own elaboration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Electrical Methodology 4
List of Tables
List of Tables
2.1 Correction factors applied according to IEC standards, [4] and [5]. . . . . . . . . 14
2.2 Correction factors applied according to NEC standard [2] . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.3 Correction factors applied according to Australian standards, [6] and [7]. . . . . 16
2.4 Correction factors applied according to GB 50217-2018 [8] . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.5 Constants that depend on the nature of the conductor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.6 Maximum conductor temperatures for different types of insulating compound
according to IEC [4] and [5]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.7 Maximum conductor temperatures for different types of insulating compound
according to NEC [2]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.8 Maximum conductor temperatures for different types of insulating compound
according to Australian standards [6]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.9 Differences between the 𝑘 used in pvDesign and the one given by the Australian
standard [6]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.10 Maximum conductor temperatures for different types of insulating compound
according to [8]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.11 Differences between the 𝑘 used in pvDesign and the one given by the Chinese
standard [8]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.12 Maximum conductor temperatures for different types of insulating in normal
condition to electrical standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Electrical Methodology 5
Chapter 1. Electrical equipment calculation
Chapter 1
The upper limit of the number of modules per string is constrained by both conditions, and the
second condition marks the lower limit.
The maximum voltage will be reached in low-temperature conditions when the modules operate
in open-circuit. Therefore, based on the minimum operating temperature, the expression used to
calculate the maximum number of modules in series according to the first condition mentioned
above is given by Equation 1.1.
𝑉max DC system
𝑁 𝑠 max (𝑉max DC system ) = (1.1)
𝑉oc (𝑇cell min )
It is necessary to calculate the open-circuit voltage of the PV cells as a function of their temper-
ature using Equation 1.2.
𝜇
𝑉oc (𝑇cell min ) = 𝑉oc (25◦𝐶) + (𝑇cell min − 25) · 𝑉oc (25◦𝐶) · (1.2)
100
And the cell temperature is obtained from the minimum air temperature at the location, as rec-
ommended in IEC 62548 [1] and NEC 2017 [2] standards, which is calculated using Equation 1.3.
Where:
Electrical Methodology 6
Chapter 1. Electrical equipment calculation
• 𝑁𝑠 max) (𝑉max DC system ) is the maximum number of modules per string that can be defined
without exceeding the maximum DC voltage.
• 𝑉max DC system is the minimum of the following values: maximum input voltage at the in-
verter and maximum approved voltage of the module in [V].
• 𝑉oc (𝑇cell min ) is the open-circuit voltage of the cell at its minimum temperature in [V].
• 𝑉oc (25◦𝐶) is the open-circuit voltage of the cell at standard conditions in [V].
• 𝜇 is the module temperature coefficient of Voc in [%/ºC].
• 𝑇cell min is the minimum temperature of the solar cells in [ºC].
• 𝑇air min is the minimum historical value of air temperature at the location in [ºC].
To determine the maximum number of modules per string, the second condition must be also
taken into consideration. The expression used to calculate the maximum number of modules per
string that satisfies this condition is given by Equation 1.4.
Where:
• 𝑁𝑠 max (𝑉max MPPT inverter ) is the maximum number of modules per string that can be defined
to work within the voltage range that maximizes inverter’s efficiency.
• 𝑉max MPPT inverter is the maximum voltage of the MPPT voltage range of the inverter in [V].
• 𝑉mp (25◦𝐶) is the voltage at the maximum power of the cell at standard conditions in [V].
Once both conditions have been evaluated, the most restrictive value of maximum number of
modules per string is considered as the final one.
The second condition, which will define the minimum number of modules in series, is a function
of the maximum temperature of the module cell. This temperature will be reached when the
modules generate a higher voltage, in low ambient temperature conditions. Therefore, based on
the maximum operating temperature, the expression used to calculate the minimum number of
modules is given by Equation 1.5.
The voltage at the maximum power of the photovoltaic cells and cell temperature are calculated
using Equation 1.6.
𝜇
𝑉mp (𝑇cell max ) = 𝑉mp (25◦𝐶) + (𝑇cell max − 25) · 𝑉mp (25◦𝐶) · (1.6)
100
𝑇𝑁 𝑂𝐶𝑇 ( ◦𝐶)−20◦𝐶
𝑇cell max = 𝑇air max + 𝐼 max · (1.7)
800𝑊 /𝑚 2
Electrical Methodology 7
Chapter 1. Electrical equipment calculation
Where:
The minimum historical temperature normally occurs after the sunrise, when the atmosphere has
been longer without the sun heating it up. For this reason, differences between both temperatures
(minimum historical temperature and minimum historical temperature limited to sunlight hours)
do not normally cause differences in the maximum number of modules per string.
Considering a system where the DC maximum voltage is 1500 V, 𝑉oc of the module is 49.6 V and
the module temperature coefficient is -0.233 %/ºC and minimum historical temperatures of -10
ºC, 0 ºC, 10ºC and 20 ºC, Figure 1.1, Figure 1.2, Figure 1.3 and Figure 1.4 represent the temperature
variation needed in the module to increase the recommended value of modules per string.
Electrical Methodology 8
Chapter 1. Electrical equipment calculation
Figure 1.1: Maximum number of modules per string with module temperature from -10 ºC to -8
ºC. Source: Own elaboration.
Figure 1.2: Maximum number of modules per string with module temperature from 5 ºC to 7 ºC.
Source: Own elaboration.
Figure 1.3: Maximum number of modules per string with module temperature from 10 ºC to 12
ºC. Source: Own elaboration.
Electrical Methodology 9
Chapter 1. Electrical equipment calculation
Figure 1.4: Maximum number of modules per string with module temperature from 20 ºC to 22
ºC. Source: Own elaboration.
These figures show that the differences between minimum historical temperature and the min-
imum historical temperature limited to sunlight hours must be 0.6 ºC, 1.7 ºC, 11. 6 ºC and 1.6
ºC for the cases where the minimum historical temperature is -10 ºC, 5 ºC, 10 ºC and 20 ºC, re-
spectively, to denote an increase in the maximum recommended number of modules per string.
Moreover, in a range of 30 ºC (from -10 ºC to 20 ºC), 2 units in the number of modules per string
were increased (from 27 to 29).
Due to the small differences in the results obtained with both methods and to be in compliance
with NEC 2017[2], pvDesign will use as cell temperature the minimum historical temperature to
calculate the maximum number of modules per string.
• String Box: The strings of modules are connected to a string box. Then groups of string
boxes are connected to central inverters. The number of strings per string box ranges from
4 to 36.
• Bus System: The strings are connected to a DC Bus collector and the connections reach
the inverters. The number of strings per DC Bus collector ranges from 4 to 36.
• String Box L2 (Field): The strings are connected to string boxes which are connected to
another level of string boxes which we call L2 that are located in the field. Finally, groups
of these are boxes are connected to the central inverters. The number of strings per level
1 string box varies from 4 to 16. And the number of level 1 string boxes per level 2 string
box ranges between 12 and 16.
• String Box L2 (Station): The strings are connected to string boxes which are connected to
another level of string boxes which we call L2 that are located in the power stations. And
groups of these are finally connected to the central inverters.
Electrical Methodology 10
Chapter 1. Electrical equipment calculation
• String Inverter (Field): The strings are connected directly to the string inverters. The string
inverters are located in the field (outside the power stations).
• String Inverter (Station): The string inverters, in this case, are located in the power stations.
1. The fuse current must be greater than or equal to 1.56 times the module’s short circuit
current.
𝐼 fuse ≥ 1.56 · 𝐼 sc (1.8)
2. The fuse current must have a value between the cable’s load current and its maximum
current capacity.
𝐼 load ≤ 𝐼 fuse ≤ 𝐼 ccc (1.9)
Where:
1.3.2 Breakers
To size the on-load circuit breaker, the following conditions must be considered:
1. The switch current rating must be greater than or equal to 1.25 times the module’s short
circuit current.
𝐼 breaker ≥ 1.25 · 𝐼 sc (1.10)
2. The switch current rating must be less than or equal to the maximum current capacity of
cables.
𝐼 breaker ≤ 𝐼 ccc (1.11)
Where:
Electrical Methodology 11
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
Chapter 2
This section explains the different criteria followed by each of the electrical standards that pvDe-
sign offers.
2.1 Introduction
To size the cables of the PV plant based on the electrical standards, the following criteria must
be satisfied:
• Current-carrying capacity criterion: The operating current is corrected based on the dif-
ferent characteristics of the installation and the site. This corrected value must then be
lower than the maximum current-carrying capacity that the cable can withstand. These
maximum current-carrying capacity values are based on standard tables.
• Short-circuit temperature rise criterion: The short-circuit current must be lower than the
limit supported by the cabling. This criterion is taking into account only for medium volt-
age cables.
• Voltage drop criterion: The criterion states that the voltage drop in each cable should be
lower than the maximum values established by the user in pvDesign. AAlthough this
criterion is considered to size the cable, not complying with it doesn’t imply the damage
of the cable; however, it implies that the losses will be greater.
The constraints considered when calculating the low voltage (LV) and medium voltage (MV)
cables are:
• To minimize the costs using the minimum valid cable cross-section(s). We tend to limit
the number of cross-sections to a maximum of two in each sub-system of the PV plant
(standardize the cable cross-sections).
• Copper is proposed as the conducting material for the LV DC string cables. Aluminium is
proposed as the conducting material for the rest of cables (DC, AC and MV).
The assumptions made when sizing and rating the cables are the following:
Electrical Methodology 12
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
• The ambient temperature is the maximum historical temperature of the site (provided by
the meteo data source).
• The soil resistivity is equal to 1 K·m/W, if no information is available.
• The depth of cables are 700 mm for buried LV cables and 900 mm for MV cables.
• There is no space between LV cables, and the MV cables are spaced 0.2 m between group
centres.
• String cables are fastened to the structures. The rest of LV cables are directly buried in
trenches. MV radial networks from the power stations to the substation are directly buried
in trenches.
The operating current is corrected based on the different characteristics of the installation and
the site. This corrected value must then be lower than the maximum current-carrying capacity
that the cable can withstand.
The equation for the corrected allowed current is given by Equation 2.1.
Where:
• 𝐼 sizing is the sizing current for the current-carrying capacity criterion in [A].
• 𝐼 ccc are the current values standardized for each cable cross-section based on the cable and
the installation characteristics in [A]
As it is presented in the following sections, the operating current of the cable is corrected with
some factors:
1. An ambient air temperature correction factor is only applied when the cables are exposed
to air or installed in trays fastened to the structures.
2. A soil temperature correction factor is only applied when the cables are directly buried in
trenches or underground cable ducts.
3. A soil resistivity correction factor is only applied when the cables are directly buried in
trenches or underground cable ducts.
4. A depth of burial correction factor is only applied when the cables are directly buried in
trenches or underground cable ducts.
5. Grouping cables together leads to additional heating of the cables which increases the
current passing through them.
Electrical Methodology 13
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
𝐼 operating
𝐼 sizing = (2.2)
𝐶𝐹
Where:
• 𝐼 sizing is the sizing current for the current-carrying capacity criterion in [A].
• 𝐼 operating is the load current running through the cable in [A].
• 𝐶𝐹 is the product of all the applied correction factors.
The ambient and soil temperature correction factors are calculated using Equation 2.3.
12
𝜃 i − 𝜃 a 𝛽 + 𝜃 i0
𝐶𝐹 temp = 0 · (2.3)
𝜃 i − 𝜃 a0 𝛽 + 𝜃 i
Where:
The other correction factors that are used to size a cable according to IEC standards are given in
Table 2.1.
Table 2.1: Correction factors applied according to IEC standards, [4] and [5].
According to IEC standards [4] and [5], in order to compute the correction factor for a group of
cables, there are some considerations depending on the current running through the cable:
• For DC cables: Two single-core cables or one multi-core cable are considered as one current-
carrying conductor.
Electrical Methodology 14
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
• For AC cables: Three single-core cables or one multi-core cable are considered as one
current-carrying conductor.
𝐼 operating
𝐼 sizing = (2.4)
𝐶𝐹
Where:
• 𝐼 sizing is the sizing current for the current-carrying capacity criterion in [A].
• 𝐼 operating is the load current running through the cable in [A]. It is the inverter continuous
output current for string inverters and the operating current for the MV system.
• 𝐶𝐹 is the product of all the applied correction factors.
The sizing current for the photovoltaic source circuit (from modules to the inverters) is given by
Equation 2.5.
1.25 · 𝐼 sc
𝐼 corrected = (2.6)
𝐶𝐹
Where:
After that, we raise the result to the next standard fuse or circuit breaker size defined in section
240.6 of the NEC. The obtained current will be denoted as 𝐼 OCPD .
Where:
• 𝐼 OCPD is the protective device rated current defined in section 240.6 of the NEC in [A].
• 𝐼 sc is the short-circuit current of the PV module for the string cables and the short-circuit
current of the module multiplied by the number of strings per box/DC bus in [A].
Electrical Methodology 15
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
The ambient and soil temperature correction factors are calculated using Equation 2.3. The other
correction factors that are used to size a cable according to NEC standards are given in Table 2.2.
According to NEC standards, in order to compute the correction factor for a group of cables,
there are some considerations depending on the current running through the cable:
• For DC cables: Two single-core cables or one multi-core cable are considered as two
current-carrying conductors.
• For AC cables: Three single-core cables or one multi-core cable are considered as three
current-carrying conductors.
Table 2.3: Correction factors applied according to Australian standards, [6] and [7].
The Australian standard considers one circuit to compute the correction factor for a group of
cables as any multicore cable with 2 or 3 current-carrying cores or a group of single core cables
with 2 or 3 current-carrying cables.
Electrical Methodology 16
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
To adapt the values given by [8] to the type of cables that are used in photovoltaic installations,
the following considerations have been made:
• Table C.0.1-1/2 have been used for low voltage PVC cables and Table C.0.1-3/4 have been
used for low voltage XLPE cables.
• Table C.0.3 have been used for MV XLPE cables.
• The values given for single core low voltage cables have been considered for both AC and
DC cables.
• The values given for multi-core medium voltage cables have been considered for both
single and multi-core cables.
• Soil resistivity correction factor has been considered for XLPE and PVC low voltage cables
and for XLPE medium voltage cables.
• The correction factors for groups of cables have been extended up to 12 cables, including
also the possibility of having cables touching. To do this, the guidelines presented in other
standards such as [4] and [6] have been followed.
2
𝐼
𝜃 = 𝜃 amb + (𝜃 i − 𝜃 amb ) · (2.8)
𝐼a
Where:
Electrical Methodology 17
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
current. This criterion is only applied in the case of MV cables and the equation that is applied
is valid for all the electrical standards. [10]
√ √
𝐼 AD · 𝑡 𝐼 sc · 𝑡
𝑆= = (2.9)
𝑘 𝜀 ·𝑘
Where:
s
𝜃f + 𝛽
𝑘 =𝐾· 𝑙𝑛 (2.10)
𝜃i + 𝛽
Where:
• 𝐾 is a constant that depends on the nature of the conductor and the temperature limit
of the insulator in [𝐴𝑠 0.5 /𝑚 2 ]. This parameter equals 226 𝐴𝑠 0.5 /𝑚𝑚 2 for copper (Cu) and
148 𝐴𝑠 0.5 /𝑚𝑚 2 for aluminium (Al).
• 𝛽 is the reciprocal of the temperature coefficient of resistivity at 0ºC. This parameter equals
234.5 ºC for copper (Cu) and 228 ºC for aluminium (Al).
• 𝜃 f is the final short circuit temperature of the conductor in [ºC]. Its value depends on the
standard.
• 𝜃 i is the maximum allowable conductor temperature in [ºC]. It is equal to the maximum
operational insulator temperature in normal operation.
√
𝐼 sc · 𝑡
𝑆= s (2.11)
𝜃f + 𝛽
𝐾 · 𝑙𝑛
𝜃i + 𝛽
Where the 𝐾 that is a constant that depends on the nature of the conductor and the temperature
limit of the insulator and 𝛽 is the reciprocal of the temperature coefficient of resistivity at 0ºC,
are shown in Table 2.5.
Electrical Methodology 18
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
Table 2.6: Maximum conductor temperatures for different types of insulating compound accord-
ing to IEC [4] and [5].
2 2 𝜃 f + 234.5
𝐼 sc · 𝑡 = 0.0297 · 𝑆 Cu · 𝑙𝑜𝑔10 (2.12)
𝜃 i + 234.5
2 2 𝜃 f + 228
𝐼 sc · 𝑡 = 0.0125 · 𝑆 Al · 𝑙𝑜𝑔10 (2.13)
𝜃 i + 228
Where:
However, by applying Equation 2.14 and Equation 2.15, the NEC equations to calculate the section
based on the short-circuit rise criterion are the same as the method followed by the IEC.
𝑙𝑛(𝑥)
𝑙𝑜𝑔10 (𝑥) = (2.14)
2.3
2
1 𝑚𝑚 = 1973.5 𝑐𝑚𝑖𝑙 (2.15)
Electrical Methodology 19
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
√
𝐼 sc · 𝑡 0.5 2
𝑆 Cu = r s ⇒ 𝐾Cu = 224.1 ≈ 226 𝐴𝑠 /𝑚𝑚 (2.16)
0.0297 𝜃 f + 234
· 1973.5 · 𝑙𝑛
2.3 𝜃 i + 234
√
𝐼 sc · 𝑡 0.5 2
𝑆 Al = r s ⇒ 𝐾Al = 145.4 ≈ 148 𝐴𝑠 /𝑚𝑚 (2.17)
0.0125 𝜃 f + 228
· 1973.5 · 𝑙𝑛
2.3 𝜃 i + 228
The NEC presents the maximum conductor temperatures for different types of insulating com-
pound and they can be seen in Table 2.7.
Table 2.7: Maximum conductor temperatures for different types of insulating compound accord-
ing to NEC [2].
Table 2.8: Maximum conductor temperatures for different types of insulating compound accord-
ing to Australian standards [6].
Apart from these temperature limits, the Australian Standard provides the value of 𝑘 required in
its Table 52. The differences between those values and the ones calculated using the constants
presented in Table 2.5 are outlined in Table 2.9. As the differences are negligible, the constants
from Table 2.5 have been used to apply this criterion. By using Equation 2.10, the values are
given in Table 2.9.
Table 2.9: Differences between the 𝑘 used in pvDesign and the one given by the Australian stan-
dard [6].
Conductor and insulator 𝑘 pvDesign [𝐴𝑠 0.5 /𝑚 2 ] 𝑘 Australian standard [𝐴𝑠 0.5 /𝑚 2 ]
Cu PVC 111.3 111.0
Al PVC 73.6 73.6
Cu XLPE/EPR 143.1 143.0
Al XLPE/EPR 94.5 94.5
Electrical Methodology 20
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
Applying the recommended values from this standard for copper and aluminium, and the maxi-
mum temperature allowed by insulating materials, the value of 𝑘 between Table 2.5 and the ones
given by this standard are the presented in Table 2.11. As per [8], the values are very similar and
the constants from Table 2.5 have been used to apply this standard.
Table 2.11: Differences between the 𝑘 used in pvDesign and the one given by the Chinese standard
[8].
Conductor and insulator 𝑘 pvDesign [𝐴𝑠 0.5 /𝑚 2 ] 𝑘 Chinese standard [𝐴𝑠 0.5 /𝑚 2 ]
Cu PVC 102.8 112.82
Al PVC 68.0 67.07
Cu XLPE/EPR 143.1 143.37
Al XLPE/EPR 94.5 93.22
s r
𝑡 𝑡
𝜀= 1+𝐹 ·𝐴· + 𝐹2 · 𝐵 · (2.18)
𝑆 𝑆
Where:
In order to analyse the error that is made by estimating a dissipation factor equals to 1, the next
process has been followed.
Electrical Methodology 21
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
3. If the real dissipation factor is close to 1, the error made would be negligible.
As presented in Figure 2.1 and Figure 2.2, the real dissipation factor for short-circuit currents
higher than 10 kA (more common short-circuit currents for the MV system of a PV plant), is
almost 1. In conclusion, the dissipation factor can be taken as 1 and the error made would be
negligible.
Figure 2.1: Dissipation factor and Cu XLPE cross-section based on short-circuit temperature rise
[𝑚𝑚 2 ]. Source: Own elaboration.
Electrical Methodology 22
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
Figure 2.2: Dissipation factor and Al XLPE cross-section based on short-circuit temperature rise
[𝑚𝑚 2 ]. Source: Own elaboration.
In the case of AC cables, in both LV and MV sub-systems, the minimum cable cross-section per
the voltage drop criterion is given by Equation 2.19.
√
3·𝜌 ·𝐿·𝐼
𝑆= (2.19)
Δ𝑉 · 𝑉
Where:
Electrical Methodology 23
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
In the case of DC cables, the minimum cable cross-section per the voltage drop criterion is given
by Equation 2.20.
2·𝜌 ·𝐿·𝐼
𝑆= (2.20)
Δ𝑉 · 𝑉
Where:
The resistivity of the conducting material at a specific temperature is calculated using Equa-
tion 2.21.
Where:
• 𝜌 is the conducting material resistivity at the cable’s insulator maximum operational tem-
perature in [Ω𝑚 2 /𝑚].
• 𝜌 (20◦𝐶) is the conducting material resistivity at 20ºC in [Ω𝑚 2 /𝑚]. It equals 1/56·10−6 Ω𝑚 2 /𝑚
for copper and 1/35 · 10−6 Ω𝑚 2 /𝑚 for aluminium
• 𝛼 is a parameter that depends on the type of material used. It equals 0.00392 ◦𝐶 −1 for
copper and 0.00403 ◦𝐶 −1 for aluminium.
• 𝜃 i is the maximum allowable conductor temperature in [ºC]. It equals the maximum oper-
ational insulator temperature in normal operation.
Table 2.12: Maximum conductor temperatures for different types of insulating in normal condi-
tion to electrical standards
Electrical Methodology 24
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
Figure 2.3: Al XLPE cable cross-section based on resistivities at different temperatures [𝑚𝑚 2 ].
Source: Own elaboration.
Where:
Considering that the DC cable resistance equals to the AC cable resistance can produce a maxi-
mum of 7% error for sections from 300 to 630 𝑚𝑚 2 . For sections lower than 300 𝑚𝑚 2 , this error
is negligible. Taking both resistances as equal gives less conservative results as it is seen in
Figure 2.4 and Figure 2.5.
Electrical Methodology 25
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
Figure 2.4: AC and DC resistivities for a Cu cable based on IEC. Source: Own elaboration.
Figure 2.5: AC and DC resistivities for a Cu cable based on Tables 8 and 9 of the NEC standard.
Source: Own elaboration.
Electrical Methodology 26
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
√
3 · 𝜌 · 𝐿 · 𝐼 · 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜑
𝑆= √ (2.23)
Δ𝑉 − 3 · 𝑥/𝑛 · 𝐿 · 𝐼 · 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜑
Where:
At this moment, pvDesign is not able to size the cable using the cosine of phi. For that reason, a
study about how the reactance of the line will affect the selection of the cross-section of Al and
Cu cables has been performed. A reactance of 0.08 Ω/𝑘𝑚 has been selected.
In Figure 2.6 and Figure 2.7, the results that have been presented show the increase of section
that would be necessary if the reactance of the line is considered in comparison with the sections
obtained using Equation 2.19.
Hence, it is recommended to rise the allowed voltage drop for MV lines as the PV plant surface
increases in order to have more realistic cross-sections. In conclusion, not taking into account
the reactance of the line implies less conservative results.
Figure 2.6: Average increase of cross-sections for Al cables considering different voltage drops
for cos phi = 0.95, 0.9 and 0.85, and different cable lengths. Source: Own elaboration
Electrical Methodology 27
Chapter 2. Electrical Sizing Criteria
Figure 2.7: Average increase of cross-sections for Cu cables considering different voltage drops
for cos phi = 0.95, 0.9 and 0.85, and different cable lengths. Source: Own elaboration
Electrical Methodology 28
Bibliography
Bibliography
[1] Technical Committee 84, “Photovoltaic (pv) arrays - design requirements,” International
Electrotechnical Commision, IEC 62548:2016, 2016.
[2] National Electrical Code Committee, “Nfpa 70 national electrical code,” International Stan-
dard, 2017.
[3] Technical Committee 82, “Ground-mounted photovoltaic power plants - design guidelines
and recommendations,” International Electrotechnical Commision, IEC TS 62738:2018, 2018.
[4] Technical Committee 20, “Power cables with extruded insulation and their accessories for
rated voltages from 1 kv (um = 1,2 kv) up to 30 kv (um = 36 kv) - part 2: Cables for rated
voltages from 6 kv (um = 7,2 kv) up to 30 kv (um = 36 kv),” International Electrotechnical
Commision, IEC 60502-2:2014, 2014.
[5] Technical Committee 64, “Low-voltage electrical installations - part 5-52: Selection and
erection of electrical equipment - wiring systems,” International Electrotechnical Commi-
sion, IEC 60364-5-52:2009, 2009.
[6] EL-001, “Electrical installations. selection of cables cables for alternating voltages up to
and including 1 kv. typical australian installation conditions,” Standards Australia, AS
3008.1.1:2017, 2017.
[7] Prysmian Australia Pty Ltd, “Medium voltage cables,” Technical report, 2015.
[8] “Standard for design of cables of electric power engineering,” National Standard of the
People’s Republic of China, GB 50217-2018, 2018.
[9] Prysmian Group, “Manual tecnico y practico de cables y accesorios para media tension,”
White paper, 2008.
[10] Technical Committee 20, “Calculation of thermally permissible short-circuit currents, tak-
ing into account non-adiabatic heating effects,” International Electrotechnical Commision,
IEC 60949:1988, 1988.
[11] RatedPower, “Substation methodology. a methodology to design an air-insulated substa-
tion,” RatedPower, 2020.
[12] Technical Committee 20, “Electric cables - calculation of the current rating - part 1-1: Cur-
rent rating equations and calculation of losses - general,” International Electrotechnical
Commision, IEC 60287-1-1:2006, 2006.
[13] IEEE, “IEEE Recommended Practice for Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Anal-
ysis,” no. IEEE Std 399-1997, 1997.
Electrical Methodology 29
Bibliography
[14] Technical Committee 20, “Electric cables - calculation of the current rating - part 3-1: Op-
erating conditions - site reference conditions,” International Electrotechnical Commision,
IEC 60287-3-1:2017, 2017.
[15] Technical Committee 64, “Low-voltage electrical installations - part 5-54: Selection and
erection of electrical equipment - earthing arrangements and protective conductors,” In-
ternational Electrotechnical Commision, IEC 60364-5-54:2011, 2006.
Electrical Methodology 30
Appendix A. Determining cable cross-sections
Appendix A
The assumptions made for the following examples are the following ones:
𝑆 VA 12 · 106
𝐼 load = √ = √ = 230 𝐴 (A.1)
𝑉 · 3 30 · 103 · 3
The IEC standard followed to size a medium voltage cable is the IEC 60502-2. The reference
conditions that the IEC standard takes as basis for its tables are the following ones:
Electrical Methodology 31
Appendix A. Determining cable cross-sections
As the medium voltage cable is directly buried, the ground temperature correction factor is given
by Equation 2.3. The conductor is aluminium whose 𝛽 equals 228 ºC. The insulator material is
XLPE whose operational temperature in normal conditions is 𝜃 i = 90 ºC.
21 12
𝜃 i − 𝜃 a 𝛽 + 𝜃 i0
90 − 25 228 + 90
𝐶𝐹 temp = 0 · = · = 0.928 (A.2)
𝜃 i − 𝜃 a0 𝛽 + 𝜃 i 90 − 20 228 + 90
The other corrections factors are given in the following table. In order to find them in the tables,
there are few parameters that need to be taken into account.
First of all, this medium voltage cable is a single core cable. There are 10 circuits that are grouped
together to link the power stations to the substations. In this case, according to IEC, a value of
10 current-carrying conductors should be considered to obtain the correction factor for a group
of cables. Second, the cable is installed at a depth of 0.9 m and they are spaced 0.2 m between
group centres. Last, the soil resistivity that is considered is equal to 1 Km/W.
According to table B.3 of the IEC standard, the section chosen is 300 𝑚𝑚 2 .
According to the short-circuit current criterion, the section is obtained using Equation 2.11. The
short-circuit temperature of the XLPE is 250 ºC.
√ √
𝐼 sc · 𝑡 25000 · 1 2
𝑆= s = s = 266 𝑚𝑚 (A.5)
𝜃f + 𝛽 250 + 228
𝐾 · 𝑙𝑛 148 · 𝑙𝑛
𝜃i + 𝛽 90 + 228
Electrical Methodology 32
Appendix A. Determining cable cross-sections
According to the voltage drop criterion, the section is obtained using Equation 2.19.
√ √
3 · 𝜌 (20◦𝐶) · (1 + 𝛼 (𝜃 i − 20)) · 𝐿 · 𝐼 3 · 1/35 · (1 + 0.00403(90 − 20)) · 500 · 230
𝑆= = = 48 𝑚𝑚 2
Δ𝑉 · 𝑉 0.005 · 30000
(A.6)
𝑆 VA 12 · 106
𝐼 load = √ = √ = 230 𝐴 (A.8)
𝑉 · 3 30 · 103 · 3
The reference conditions that the NEC standard takes as basis for its tables of MV cables are the
following ones:
As the medium voltage cable is directly buried, the ground temperature correction factor is given
by Equation 2.3. The conductor is aluminium whose 𝛽 equals 228 ºC. The insulator material is
XHHN whose operational temperature in normal conditions is 𝜃 i = 90 ºC.
21 12
𝜃 i − 𝜃 a 𝛽 + 𝜃 i0
90 − 25 228 + 90
𝐶𝐹 temp = 0 · = · = 0.928 (A.9)
𝜃 i − 𝜃 a0 𝛽 + 𝜃 i 90 − 20 228 + 90
The other corrections factors are given in the following table. In order to find them in the tables,
there are few parameters that need to be taken into account.
First of all, this medium voltage cable is a single core cable. There are 10 circuits that are grouped
together to link the power stations to the substations. In this case, according to NEC, a value of
30 current-carrying conductors should be considered to obtain the correction factor for a group
of cables. Second, the cable is installed at a depth of 0.9 m and they are spaced 0.2 m between
group centres. Last, the soil resistivity that is considered is equal to 1 Km/W.
Electrical Methodology 33
Appendix A. Determining cable cross-sections
𝐼 operating 230
𝐼 sizing = = = 453 𝐴 (A.10)
𝐶𝐹 0.928 · 0.91 · 1 · 0.6
According to table 310.60(C)(86) of the NEC standard, the section chosen is 750 kcmil.
According to the short-circuit current criterion, the section is obtained using Equation 2.11. The
short-circuit temperature of the XHHN is 250 ºC.
√ √
𝐼 sc · 𝑡 25000 · 1 2
𝑆= s = s = 266 𝑚𝑚 (A.12)
𝜃f + 𝛽 250 + 228
𝐾 · 𝑙𝑛 148 · 𝑙𝑛
𝜃i + 𝛽 90 + 228
According to the voltage drop criterion, the section is obtained using Equation 2.19.
√ √
3 · 𝜌 (20◦𝐶) · (1 + 𝛼 (𝜃 i − 20)) · 𝐿 · 𝐼 3 · 1/35 · (1 + 0.00403(90 − 20)) · 500 · 230
𝑆= = = 48 𝑚𝑚 2
Δ𝑉 · 𝑉 0.005 · 30000
(A.13)
Electrical Methodology 34
Appendix A. Determining cable cross-sections
𝑆 VA 10.585 · 103
𝐼 load = √ = = 9.24 𝐴 (A.15)
𝑉· 3 1145·
The IEC standard followed to size a low voltage cable is the IEC 60364-5-52. The reference con-
ditions that the IEC standard takes as basis for its tables are the following ones:
As the low voltage cable is fastened to a structure, the ambient temperature correction factor is
given by Equation 2.3. The conductor is copper whose 𝛽 equals 234.5 ºC. The insulator material
is XLPE whose operational temperature in normal conditions is 𝜃 i = 90 ºC.
12 21
𝜃 i − 𝜃 a 𝛽 + 𝜃 i0
90 − 40 234.5 + 90
𝐶𝐹 temp = 0 · = · = 0.83 (A.16)
𝜃 i − 𝜃 a0 𝛽 + 𝜃 i 90 − 30 234.5 + 90
The other corrections factors are given in the following table. In order to find them in the tables,
there are few parameters that need to be taken into account.
First of all, this low voltage cable is a single core cable. There are 24 circuits that are grouped
together to link the structures to a string box. In this case, according to IEC, a value of 24 current-
carrying conductors should be considered to obtain the correction factor for a group of cables.
Second, the cable is fastened to a structure and they are touching among each other.
𝐼 operating 9.24
𝐼 sizing = = = 15.4 𝐴 (A.17)
𝐶𝐹 0.833 · 0.72
According to table B.52.12 of the IEC standard, the section chosen is 1.5 𝑚𝑚 2 .
According to the voltage drop criterion, the section is obtained using Equation 2.20.
Electrical Methodology 35
Appendix A. Determining cable cross-sections
The reference conditions that the NEC standard takes as basis for its tables of LV cables are the
following ones:
As the low voltage cable is fastened to a structure, the ambient temperature correction factor is
given by Equation 2.3. The conductor is copper whose 𝛽 equals 234.5 ºC. The insulator material
is XHHN whose operational temperature in normal conditions is 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑡𝑎 i = 90 ºC.
12 21
𝜃 i − 𝜃 a 𝛽 + 𝜃 i0
90 − 40 234.5 + 90
𝐶𝐹 temp = 0 · = · = 0.83 (A.22)
𝜃 i − 𝜃 a0 𝛽 + 𝜃 i 90 − 30 234.5 + 90
The other corrections factors are given in the following table. In order to find them in the tables,
there are few parameters that need to be taken into account.
First of all, this low voltage cable is a single core cable. There are 24 circuits that are grouped
together to link the structures to a string box. In this case, according to NEC, a value of 48
current-carrying conductors should be considered to obtain the correction factor for a group of
cables. Second, the cable is fastened to a structure and they are touching among each other.
Electrical Methodology 36
Appendix A. Determining cable cross-sections
According to table 310.15(B)(17) of the NEC standard, the section chosen is 14 AWG.
According to the voltage drop criterion, the section is obtained using Equation 2.20.
Electrical Methodology 37
Appendix B. Determining electrical characteristics of the cable
Appendix B
Determining electrical
characteristics of the cable
After selecting the cross-section based on the three criteria that have been presented in this
methodology, the electrical characteristics of the cable are computed. These are the voltage drop,
the temperature and the short-circuit current that the cables can withstand.
2
𝐼
𝜃 = 𝜃 amb + (𝜃 i − 𝜃 amb ) · (B.1)
𝐼a
2
230
𝜃 = 25 + (90 − 25) · = 84 ◦𝐶 < 𝜃 i = 90 ◦𝐶 ⇒ 𝑂𝐾 (B.2)
414 · 0.58
√
3 · 𝜌 (20◦𝐶) · (1 + 𝛼 (84◦𝐶 − 20)) · 𝐿 · 𝐼
Δ𝑉 = (B.3)
𝑆 ·𝑉
√
3 · 0.0359 · 500 · 230
Δ𝑉 = = 0.08% < Δ𝑉input = 0.5% ⇒ 𝑂𝐾 (B.4)
300 · 30000
Electrical Methodology 38
Appendix B. Determining electrical characteristics of the cable
s
𝜃f + 𝛽
𝑆 ·𝐾 · 𝑙𝑛
𝜃i + 𝛽
𝐼 sc = √ (B.5)
𝑡
s
250 + 228
300 · 148 · 𝑙𝑛
90 + 228
𝐼 sc = √ = 28.2 𝑘𝐴 > 𝐼 sc grid = 25 𝑘𝐴 ⇒ 𝑂𝐾 (B.6)
1
Electrical Methodology 39