Unit Promoters: 3.0 Objectives
Unit Promoters: 3.0 Objectives
Objectives
Introduction
Promoter : Meaning and Importance
Functions of a Promoter
Legal Position of Promoters
Duties of Promoters
Liabilities of Promoters
Remuneration of Promoters
Position of Preliminary Contracts
Let Us Sum Up
Key Words
Answers to Check Your Progress
Terminal QuestionslEx~rcises ,
3.0 OBJECTIVES
After studying this unit you should be able to:
o explain the meaning and importance of promoters,
e describe the functions of a promoter,
o enumerate duties and liabilities of a promoter,
e describe remuneration payable to promoters, and
o explain the position of preliminary contracts.
3.1 INTRODUCTION
In Unit 1 you learnt about the various types of companies that can be formed. The
formation of a company is a lengthy process, involving different stages. The first stage
in the,process of formation of a company is the 'promotion'. At this stage the idea of
carrying on a business is conceived by a person or by a group of persons called
promoters. For incorporatirig a company various formalities are required to be
carried out. The promoters perform these 'funptions and bring the company into
existence. In this unit you will learn about the meaning and functions of promoters,
their legal position and their duties. You will also learn about the position of
pre-incorporation contracts.
....................................................
......................................................
...........................................................................................................
4 State in three lines the legal position of promoters.
3 5 DUTIES OF PROMOTERS
In the above section you have just learnt that the promoter occupies a position of total
confidence and trust in relation to the company promoted by him. The promoter in
this fiduciary capacity has the foIlowing impoitant duties.
1 Not to make any secret profit: A promoter cannot make any direct or indirect
profits out of the promotion of the company, Since he occupies a position cf a trust,
it is his duty to be honest and uphold the'trust of his position. You must clearly
understand that the law does not forbid the promoter froni making a profit. The
law prohibits only the making of secret profits i.e. the profits which the promoter
has not disclosed to the company. The promoters of a company are perfectly free to
rnnke a !:)'ofit provided they disclose fact to an independent Board of directors. If
tklere is no intfcpendent Board of Directors, then he must disclose the profits to the
intendcd sharci-rolders.When a promoter makes a secret profit, the companx has
the following r .medies against him:
a) Rec~.+... i the contract - The Company may on learning of the secret
profit, lesci~ldthe ccntract entered into by the promoter to make the said
profit.
11) Order for rc 'iund - The company tnay require the promoter to refund'the
amount of se,:ret prafit.
c) Suit tor breach of duty -- 'T'he company may sue the promoter for
rnisftxasancc, as the promoter, by making the secret profit, has defaulted in
his duty towards the company.
2 To make full disclosure to the company of all relevant facts: In keeping with his
fiduciary capacity, a prornotcr is bound to disclose to the company all relevant facts
including any profit made from the sale of his own property to the company and his
personal intercst in a transaction with the company. You should bear in mind that
while making a clisclosure the pro~notermust make the full and complete
dist:losure. If he contracts to sell his own property to the company without making
a full disclosure, the conlpany may either repudiate the contract ok affirm the
curltract and recover the profits made by the promoter. Let us explain these
iidut:iary duties of the promoter with the help of an example.
' A ' was the owner of sonlc arid land. He and some of his friends, decided to form a
company to manufacture microchips. They appointed the first directors of the
company and 'A' sold his own land to the company at a price higher than the actual
valuation of the land. When the company was formed, the purchase agreement of
land was approved at the meeting of the shareholders but the fact of A's ownership
and the profit nratlc by him were not disclosed at the meeting. Subsequently when
the company weill into liquidation, the liquidator filed a suit against 'A' to recover
the profits made by him in the sale of land. You would observe that in this case 'A'
had defaulted in his duty to make full disclosure of all material facts and had made
a secret profit out of pro~notion,As there was no disclosure by the promoters of the
profits they were making,the company is entitled to rescind the contract. 'A' could
have retained the profits tnade by him if he had made a full disclosure to the
directors of the company o r to the shareholders of the company, all the relevant
facts of the transaction including his personal interest and the profits made.
3 To give the benefit of negotiations to the company: The promoter must pass on to
the company, the benefit of any negotiation or agreement that he has carried on in a
his capacity of a promoter. Por example, when he has negotiated a certain prict for
some land for the company, he must sell the property to the company at the
negotiated price. If he charges a price higher than the negotiated price, the
company may rescind the contract on discovering the truth of the matter. If, d w b
some reason, the contract could not be rescinded, the company is entitled to cWm
damages from the promoters and the amount of damages shall be equal to the
amount of profits made by promoters. However, it should be remembered that
secret profits on the sale of property can be recovered from the promoter only
when the property was bought and sold to the company while he was acting as a
promoter. The promoter must act honestly and diligently to escape liability with
respect to dealing with the future company and the outsiders.
4 Duty of promoters towards future allottees: The promoters stand in a fiduciary
position towards the company. It does not mean that they stand in such relation
only to the company but they also stand in this position to the future allottees of
shares. The prorfioters must ensure that the prospectus iqsued at his instance
contains all material facts and particulars and does not contain any mis-statements.
3 . 7 REMUNERATION OF PROMOTERS
You have noted through the above paragraphs that the promoter occupies a unique
position in relation to the company. Before the company is brought into existence he
has to complete all the formalities, spend considerable skill and effort and organise
necessary resources so that the company can be formed. He has to incur preliminary
expenses as well. For all these important activities and his considerable effort he
should be suitably remunerated. However, he is also in a peculiar position for doing
all these activities for a company that is not yet in existence. The promoters cannot
claim as a matter of right any remuneration from the company. He, therefore, is not
entitled to recover any remuneration for his services unless the company after getting
formed enters into a specific contract with the promoter for this purpose. You must
note that even if the promoter has entered into a contract with the prospective
directors before the incorporation, he has no valid claim against the company for
remuneration. This is so because the directors cannot enter into any contract on
behalf of a company that is not yet in existence. There are also cases where the
articles of a company may specifically provide that a specified sum may be paid to the
promoters as remuneration for their services. While this provision gives the director
an authority to make such payment, it does not give the promoters a right to claim
remuneration or to sue the company, for the same. In actual practice, therefore, the
company, once it is registered, isuaily agrees to pay some remuneration for the
valuable services rendered by the promoters. This remuneration may be paid to the
promoters in any of the following ways:
i) He may be allowed to sell his own property to the company for cash at a price
higher than the valuation, after he has made a full disclosure about the valuation
and the profit earned to an indeperident Board of directors.
ii) If the promoter has purchased some business or some other property to be sold
, to the company, he may sell the same to the company at a higher price after
making a full disclosure of the price paid'and the profit earned.
iii) The company may allot to the prAmoters fully paid up shares of the-company.
iv) He may be paid a certain lump-sum by the company as a remuneration for
services rendered.
v) He may be given a commission at a fixed rate on the shares sold.
bi) The company may give him an option to subscribe for a certain number of the
company's unissued shares at par. This option is generally limited to a certain
period which means that the promoter must subscribe to the shares within a
certain time.
The remuneration to the promoter may be paid in any of the ways mentioned above.
Whatever is the manner in which the company chooses to compensate for the services
of the promoter, the amount of remuneration and the manner of payment must be
disclosed in the prospectus, if the remuneration is paid within two years preceding
\'he date of the prospectus. I
Company and its Formation
3.8 POSITION OF PRELIMINARY CONTRACTS
In order to fulfil the necessary formalities and organise the required resources for the
formation of the company, the promoters of a company enter into contracts for a
company which is yet to be incorporated. These contracts are generally entered into
by the promoters in order to acquire some property or some rights for the company
that they are interested in promoting. All such contracts entered into by the promoters
with the third parties for the proposed company (before incorporation) are called
'preliminary contracts'. .
You must note that such preliminary or pre-incorporation contracts are-not legally
binding on the company even after its incorporation. The reason for this is that before
incorporation the company cannot enter into contract as it has no legal entity. Not
only this, the company cannot ratify such contracts after incorporation because, for
valid ratification, the principal must have been in existence at the time when the
promoters entered into such contracts. A company can neither sue nor be sued on
such contracts since a company before incorporation is a non- entity. The position of
these contracts can be explained as follows.
On registration, the company is not bound by the preliminary contracts - A
company is not bound by the preliminary contracts even if the company has
taken the benefit of the work on its behalf under the contract. For example, a
solicitor was appointed by the promoters of the company and was instructed by
them to prepare the articles and the memorandum of the company. The solicitor
also paid the necessary registration fee of the company. These promoters later
became the directors of the company. The solicitor sued for his expenses and the
fees paid by him. It was held that since the company was not in existenct when
these expenses were incurred, the company is not bound to pay.
ii) . The company cannot enforce preliminary contracts -You must note that just as
the company cannot be held liable for the preliminary contracts, it also cannot
enforce such contracts made before incorporation, by the promoters. This
means that on account of a preliminary contract the company does not get a right
to sue the third party for fulfilment of the contract. For example, 'X' the owner
of a piece of land in Assam agreed to lease it to a company t o be formed by
promoters A, B and C. The promoters later on formed a company called M.Pvt.
Ltd. On some prospecting of the land, it was discovered that there was a definite
possibility of striking oil in that land. Subsequently 'X'refused to grant the lease
to the company M.Pvt.Ltd. It was held that the company cannot sue 'X' and
cannot claim specific performance as it was not even in existence when the lease
was signed.
In relation to the above two rinciples, important provisions have been made in our
f
country in the Specific Relie Act, 1963. These provisions provide an important
exception to the above principles. According to Section 15 and 19 of the Specific
Relief Act "where the promoters of the Company have, before its incorporation,
entered into contracts for the purpose of the company and such contracts are
warranted by terms of incorporation, specific performance may be obtained by or
against the company, if the company has accepted the contract after the incorporation
and has communicated such acceptance to the other party".
In the above paragraph the term "contracts for the purposes of the company" means
contracts which are necessary for the incorporation and working of the company. For
example, contracts for the preparation and printing of the memorandum and articles
or contracts for the supply of necessary raw material for the production work in the
company are contracts for the purposes of the company. It should be clear to you now
that in order to be enforceable, it is necessary that the company after its incorporation
accepts the contract and communicates its acceptance to the other contracting party.
iii) The company cannot ratify the preliminary contracts - After incorporation the
Company cannot ratify the contracts formed before its existence. You will recall
from your study of the Unit on agency that for valid ratification of a contract, it
is essential that the principal must exist of the date when the contract is originally
entered into. And as the company does not exist.on the date of contract, it
cannot ratify a preliminary contract on being incorporated. In the case of Kelner
v.Baxter, it was held as the company was not in existence when the preliminary Promoters
contracts were made, it could not be bound by any purported ratification. What
the company can'do is to enter into a new contract with the vendors after
incorporatior) to give effect to the terms of the contract ma& before
incorporation.
iv) Liability of the promoter for preliminary contracts - The promoters are
personally liable for contracts made for a company which is not yet in existence.
You have already learnt that the company is neither bound nor entitled on
account of a preliminary contract. Therefore, it is the promoters alone who
remain personally liable for the preliminary contracts. The reason for this is that
the preliminary contract is made for a company which, as known to both the
contracting parties, is as yet non-existent. The contract, therefore, is deemed to
be personally entered into by the promoters and they will be held personally
liable for the performance of these contracts.
The preliminary contracts made by the promoters generally contain a provision
that if the company adopks the agreements on incorporation, the liability OF the
promoters shall come to an endsand if the company does not adopt the
preliminary contract within a specified period either party may rescind the
contract. in such a case liability of the promoter will cease on the expiry of the
specified period.
Check Your Progress C
1 Enumerate three ways in which the promoter can be remunerated.
x) True