"Palmam Qui Meruit Ferat". ... Or, The Ancient Ones of The Earth. Being The History of The Primitive Alphabet

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

)

PALMAM QUI MERUIT FERAT."

‫הארץ‬ ‫קדמי‬
OR THE

ANCIENT ONES OF THE EARTH .

BEING THE

History of the Primitive Alphabet ,

LATELY DISCOVERED BY THE AUTHOR,

AP
‫ס‬
‫ס‬

‫ס‬ | ‫ס‬

‫ף‬.idle
‫ י‬D .58

borse : H
The formeMELBOURNE
e Freemasoning

T. HARWOOD , 23 COLLINS STREET EAST .


‫ל‬
1864.
HEBREW THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGE . 3

and to lead every devout mind to exclaim , This must be the finger
of God ! For the man who believes that our Maker intended to
elevate the human species by the use of a volume of revelation , must
deem it probable that He had provided early methods of securing
the sacred records which were to constitute that volume."
The Pentateuch is generally acknowledged to be the most ancient
composition extant; and as that is held to have been written or
compiled by Moses, it also presupposes, from the nature of its con .
tents, that there must have been a vast mass of historical matter
written , according to the primitive fashion upon stones, from which
Moses either directly or indirectly drew his materials. The dis
coveries of late years , by Layard and others, speak plainly as to
this fact.As Nineveh and the Assyrian empire had existed for
more than 700 years anterior to the Exodus, it is not reasonable to
suppose that a nation so far advanced in the arts and sciences
should be ignorant of the art of alphabetical writing ; and although
we have at present no evidence to prove it, still the time may not
be far distant when it will be seen that Moses drew largely from the
documents and records b'bb ( SPHRIM ) , preserved by the descend
ants of Shem in the Assyrian archives. Josephus, speaking of the
early history of man , says that “ those who then lived noted down
with great accuracy the births and deaths of illustrious men ;" and
Whiston adds in a note, “ these ancient genealogies were first set
down by those who then lived, and from them were transmitted
down to posterity ; which I suppose to be a true account of that
matter; for there is no reason to suppose that men were not taught.
to read and write soon after they were taught to speak ; and per
haps all by the Messiah himself ; who under the Father, was the
Creator and Governor of mankind, and who frequently in those early
days, appeared unto them ."
The Talmudists are of opinion that the Aramean was the primi
tive language, and that Adam and Eve conversed in that language
in Paradise. Thus Mars Ibas, the Armenian historian informs us
that “ Haicus, the son of Togarmah, the grandson of Japhet, being
oppressed by Belus king of Babylon ( supposed to be Nimrod, the
THE ANCIENT ONES OF THE EARTH .

mighty hunter ), went forth with his family of 300 persons exclusive
of servants, and proceeded northward to the country round about
Ararat, and here he incorporated with his followers a number
of individuals whom he found living in the most primitive state
without form or order . These people spoke the original language of
Noah. Here they established themselves and laid the foundation of
the Armenian empire. The fifth in descent from Haicus was Aram ,
up to whose time the nation and people had been called Haics ; Aram ,
being on strict terms of friendship with Ninus, the reigning king of
Nineveh, who not only permitted his reign, but assisted him in the
consolidation of his kingdom and the overthrow of his enemies,
the chief of whom was Percham of the race of giants, whom they
conquered on the plains of Gortouk in Assyria, and the tyrant was
killed upon the field of battle . ” This is partly confirmed by Diodorus
Siculus, who says , “ The Assyrian king Ninus, assisted by an
Arabian chief Ariæus, conquered and killed the then reigning king
of Babylon, and made himself master of his dominions. ” May not
this Ariæus be the same as is mentioned by Mars Ibas, Arieus, the
son of Aram ? Be that as it may , there is much conflicting testi
mony respecting the identity of this Aram and Ninus, which it is
not necessary for our purpose to enter into here ; but one thing
seems certain — that it was Aram and his son Arah who gave ,
rise to the term Aramean , -a name that subsequently became
synonymous with Syrian and Assyrian , —to the nations extending
from the mouths of the Euphrates and Tigris, to the Euxine, the
River Halys, and to Palestine. The Greeks called them Assyrians,
which is the same as Syrians.
The Scriptures inform us that “The beginning of Nimrod's
kingdom was Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calnah, in the land of
Shinar," and that “out of that land went forth Asshur, and built
Nineveh, Rehoboth , and Calah , and Resen, a great city between
Nineveh and Calah . ” But Sir H. Rawlinson tells us differently.
He says that the Chaldeans appear to have been a branch of the
Hamitic race of Akkad. He does not tell us, by the way, who
this Akkad was, neither do we find this name among the ancient
14 THE ANCIENT ONES OF THE EARTH.

be confession , sentiment, or religious opinion. His rendering of


the passage is as follows :— “ Come, let us go down and confound
their confession. So Jehovah scattered them abroad over the face
of all the earth .” “ I need only say, ” he adds, “ that now ( SPHE))
is the lip ; and when used for the voice, the indication of the mind ,
it is never once in the Bible used in any other sense than for con
fession . Before the apostacy at Babel, all men had the same
confession and the same words, and one common form ; and, not
withstanding the translation of the Bible, the Jews use the word
in that sense in their private writings, and where it cannot be in
consequence
any other sense . This confusion of sentiment was in
of the apostates wishing to set up an altar to the NAMES D'Ow
( SHMIM) , and so produce a new object of worship , which was
opposed by the true believers. The effect I think was, those who
had fallen away from the true confession, and were beginning to
frame another, instead of agreeing upon a new form for them all,
disagreed among themselves about wording it, and the manner and
degrees of the service. Each principal gained a party, and each
followed the dictates of their respective leader . So each party
formed themselves into a sect, and each sect set up a particular
form of confession to their object. It follows that it produced a
separation, and forced each, except the strongest which it is likely
Nimrod headed, to seek a separate settlement and so caused a
dispersion. And I think I may assert that there is scarce
one eminent miracle performed in early times and recorded by
Moses, but the latter prophets, nay even apocryphal books, or at
least the New Testament refer to it or recite it. I think I may
safely affirm that the pretended miracle of the confusion of tongues
at Babel is never recited or referred to."
The miracle at Babel was, in fact, a confusion or dispersion of
religious sentiments, the like of which has been seen even in
modern times ; for instance, the dispersion of the Albigenses, of
the Huguenots of France, of the English Puritans and the
Covenanters of Scotland, numbers of whom were driven from their
native land , and whose descendants now form a new empire in the
WESTERN NATIONS PEOPLED FROM THE EAST . 15

far West. Changes of time and place will modify any language,
and the simple fact of the dispersion of mankind will sufficiently
account for all the alterations which language has since undergone.
So we read that, “ Out of that land ( Babel) went forth Asshur,
and founded the cities of Nineveh , Rehoboth , Calah, and Resen."
Out of that land, in historical language, went forth Hycus, the son
of Togarmah, the grandson of Japhet. To escape from the tyranny
of the Assyrian Belus ( or Nimrod ), he went to the North with his
followers, and established himself in the region of Ararat, and
founded the kingdom of Armenia . * About 100 years prior to the
confusion at Babel - in A.M. 1662 - went forth Mitzraim with his
sons and followers, and founded the Egyptian Empire. The early
ages of Egypt are so enveloped in the mists of antiquity, that it is
almost impossible to tell what to believe respecting them ; but all
accounts tend to prove its Chaldean or Arabian origin. Thus,
Diodorus Siculus states that the Egyptians were a colony of
Ethiopians ; and Scaliger informs us that the Ethiopians called
themselves Chaldeans. The shepherd warriors, called Hyksos, who
put an end to the old kingdom of Egypt, B.C. 2200 , are now
admitted by all historians to have been of Semitic origin .
Manetho says that these shepherds were Arabians ; other
authorities call them Phænicians — a term extended in anti
quity to all the Arabian races . Scaliger also tells us that
the most elegant and most beautiful of their sacred and profane
books are written in a style resembling the Chaldean or Assyrian,
and that Egyptian names of persons and places are for the most
part reducible to the Hebrew . A still stronger proof of the origin
of the Egyptian language is, that the sacred characters of the
* Till the beginning of the fifth century the Armenians, in their writings,
used various foreign alphabets — the Persian, the Greek , and the Syriac
particularly the latter ; but as the number of characters in these alphabets
were insufficient to express all the sounds in the Armenian language, Misrob
invented for the use of his countrymen a particular alphabet written from
left to right, and originally consisting of thirty -six characters, to which
subsequently two more were added. This alphabet, which was introduced
in the year A.D. 406, is that which the Armenians still use." - Penny
Cyclopedia.
110 THE ANCIENT ONES OF THE EARTH .

country of Judea at the time specified in their translation . The


Bible is very clear upon this point ( 2 Kings, xv. , 27, 29. )
“ In the two and fiftieth year of Azariah, king of Judah ,
Pekah the son of Remaliah began to reign over Israel in Samaria,
(and reigned ) twenty years ;" and twenty -ninth verse, “ In the
days of Pekah , king of Israel, came Tiglath Pilezer, king of
Assyria , and took Ijon, and Abel Beth Maachah , and Janoah, and
Kedesh, and Hazor, and Gilead , and Galilee, all the land of Nap
thali, and carried them captive to Assyria .” And this is strongly
corroborated by Josephus ( Book IX . , chap. xi . , sec. 1. ) : “ Now
this Pekah held the government twenty years, and proved a wicked
man and a transgressor. But the king of Assyria, whose name was
Tiglath Pilezer, when he had made an expedition against the
Israelites, and had overrun all the land of Gilead, and the region
beyond Jordan , and the adjoining country, which is called Galilee,
and Kadesh , and Hazor, he made the inhabitants prisoners, and
transplanted them into his own kingdom ." Not a word is said
here about Egypt. These events took place , according to Biblical
chronology, 740 B.C. , and consequently there is a discrepancy of
nearly 400 years. Mr. Fox Talbot reads from the inscription that
the invasion of the aforesaid king was into Syria and Egypt : --
“ All the provinces of Musri (i.e., lower Egypt,) I ravaged , their
armies I destroyed, and I burnt their cities.” This interpretation
is partly supported by Sir H. Rawlinson , who says that Tiglath
Pilezer invaded Palestine and conquered all before him , from beyond
the Euphrates to the “ Upper sea of the setting sun " (the Medi
terranean ). But Dr. Hinckes, in flat contradiction to this, says,
“ I am satisfied, and I expressed my conviction most decidedly in
notes to my translation , that the countries supposed to be Egypt lay
to the north -east of Korsabad, and that the supposed expedition into
Syria and the Mediterranean WAS ONE INTO ARMENIA AND THE
BLACK SEA.” It is evident from what the doctor says here, that he
thinks Rawlinson's and Talbot's translations are mostly imaginary or
conjectural. Now, after viewing all those glaring discrepancies and
contradictions, who will be bold enough to say there is any depen

You might also like