In-Service Activities: Customer Canadair Regional Jet
In-Service Activities: Customer Canadair Regional Jet
In-Service Activities: Customer Canadair Regional Jet
FLEET STATISTICS
2
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
3
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
4
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
5
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
6
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
In the past, and still today, operators have expressed the need for a longer lasting
landing light bulb. Over the last couple of years Bombardier has completed testing
for several landing light candidates. Field evaluation tests with these candidates has
proven to be unsuccessful in meeting Bombardier’s requirements and reliability
standards. Our goal is to provide 2000 hour lights for all the exterior lighting.
Unfortunately, this process is time consuming to source out a suitable bulb and test.
The existing GE 4596 landing light bulb has an average flight hour life span of 90
hours. This means an average of 111 bulbs per year are being replaced on each
aircraft.
To provide some relief, Bombardier has a replacement bulb that is now available in
Revision 19 of the IPC and will be listed as Q5596. The new landing light bulb (P/N
Q5596) is a direct drop-in replacement, with the same physical size, luminosity,
thermal, and electrical load characteristics as the existing GE4596. The Q5596 has
been field tested and found to have an average life of 500 flight hours. This means
an average of only 20 bulbs will have to be replaced per aircraft, per year.
AlliedSignal APU IRM: Revision 6 to the APU Inspection Repair Manual (IRM) has recently
been distributed by AlliedSignal. This revision expands and enhances the IRM to provide
operators with additional information and specifications to implement the repair and overhaul of
APU components. Operators who have not yet received their copy of the IRM (Manual
number 49-24-09 dated December 31, 1998) should contact Jim McAlister in Technical
Publications at AlliedSignal at (602) 365-5632.
7
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
On Dec, 12, 1997, Rev. C of SB 601R-30-022 was issued to introduce the new bleed leak
detection switch (P/N 601R59320-1, supplied by Texas Instruments). The production effectivity
of the new switch is aircraft 7213. The previous switch (P/N 12411-2-450, supplied by Fenwal)
was reported from the field to get damaged easily during servicing.
Recently, a survey was conducted to gather field data on the performance of the new switch.
Figures provided by operators and respective FSRs indicate that the new switch reliability is
showing a great improvement. Furthermore, the new switch is showing a predominantly hard
(not intermittent) failure characteristic, which is easier to troubleshoot.
There are still some reports of intermittent failure of the new switch, though no trend was
identified. The cause for these reported cases may be attributed to installation.
SB 601R-30-022 also provided means to re-arrange the wiring of the bleed leak detection
system by dividing it into three loops
The survey showed that operators who have incorporated the complete SB (Part C for the
wiring re-arrangement was optional), have already experienced some savings in terms of
maintenance and troubleshooting. The divided loops allow the possibility of locating the
segment of the wing leading edge with an inoperative switch, by checking it at the loop
connector using a standard multimeter. This feature will preclude opening and sealing three
sections of leading edge as well as replacement of all 21 switches. Technical Services
recommends that operators consider implementation of Part C of this SB. (Action Register
item 3010-6 refers).
8
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
The loops are connected to their respective wiring harnesses via terminal lugs which are
manufactured with a steel outer sleeve covering a ceramic core.
Reports show that one of the most common reasons for removal of the sensors is damage to
the sensing element and terminal lugs. It has been observed that damage to the sensor
terminal lugs can occur if the lugs are subjected to excessive sideload force such as might
occur during installation of the lug within its bracket or during attachment of the wiring to the
lugs.
Technicians are advised to respect the following CAUTIONS when accomplishing the
installation procedures for all elements, particularly the jetpipe element.
Use extreme care when you connect the terminal lugs of the wires to the
terminal lugs of the sensing element. Hold the screws with a wrench to cancel
the torque loading when installing and tightening the nuts. The ceramic
insulator of the sensing element is fragile and can break.
Do not hit or apply any side loading to the sensing element terminals.
CRJ Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM) has been revised to add the appropriate cautions to
the removal installation procedures for all engine sensing elements. Refer to AMM section 26-
11-04, pages 401 and subs for specific procedures.
9
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
In addition, technicians are requested to exercise caution when closing the lower core cowl
panel after removal/installation of the jet-pipe sensing element. Ensure the jet-pipe sensing
element terminal lugs are properly positioned in order to prevent inadvertant fouling with core
cowl structures and resultant sensor damage. Refer to CRJ AMM Task #26-11-04-400-801 for
recommended terminal installation.
A CRJ operator has reported an air-turnback because the NLG did not retract after the gear
was selected UP. Upon return, the NLG strut reportedly appeared underserviced. Proximity
Sensor Electronics Unit (PSEU) fault codes indicated NLG WOW 1 & 2 and NLG centered
sensors, FAR condition. The operator reported that the subject strut had been completely
serviced earlier the same day. Once in the hangar, the aircraft was placed on jacks. The NLG
did not fully extend, even though 180 psi was indicated at the nitrogen charging valve (lower)
on the piston.
Per instructions from gear manufacturer, Messier-Dowty, the nitrogen pressure was released.
Oil (MIL-H-5606) level was then checked and found very low. The oil level was serviced and
the strut re-serviced with Nitrogen per published procedures. The aircraft was returned to
service without further incident.
10
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
Messier-Dowty report that in this case, it is likely that the previous servicing was accomplished
with the strut floating piston (Ref MDI CMM 32-20-04, IPL Figure 5, Item 5) not fully bottomed
within the NLG piston. If the floating piston is not fully bottomed, the strut assy will not contain
the required volume of oil and strut operation will be affected.
Refer to CRJ Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM) Tasks 12-12-32-610-803 and 804 for proper
procedures for full servicing of the NLG shock strut (Oil and Nitrogen). Refer to figure below.
The above AMM tasks contain the following procedures to be followed to ensure proper
bottoming of the floating piston;
Install a flared type union (MS28778-4) in the oil filler port at the top of the NLG
fitting and fill oil under pressure (up to 100 psi) using a servicing cart to ensure
that the sliding piston is fully bottomed within the NLG piston.
Proper servicing of the nose (and main) gear shock struts is critical to problem free operation
of the landing gear, particularly during operation in cold ambient temperature.
Always refer to the applicable CRJ AMM chapter/section for correct procedures, even for
routine servicing. This will help reduce occurrence of preventable flight delays/cancellations.
11
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
A number of CRJ operators have reported the following finding during landing gear visual
inspection: MLG Uplock Pin (P/N 17340-1, Messier-Dowty Component Maintenance Manual
(CMM) 32-10-15 IPL Figure 3, Item 170) seized within its bushing(s) and unable to rotate.
The pin is intended to rotate freely within its bracket in order to improve smoothness of MLG
release from the MLG Uplock Assembly during gear retraction and to prevent pin wear. There
is no lubrication point for this assembly and no routine lubrication or special visual inspection
task specific to this area is called out in the CRJ maintenance program.
Landing gear manufacturer Messier-Dowty has stated that while there is no risk of main
landing gear failure to extend as a result of this condition, prolonged operation with the uplock
pin seized in position will result in pin wear and damage.
Bombardier recommends that, when performing a visual inspection of the main landing gear as
part of a scheduled “A” Check (400 flight hour interval - Task Card # 000-32-730-001), the
technician take a moment to verify freedom of rotation of the uplock pin within its bracket
assembly (see figure below). General cleaning of accumulated dirt or dried grease from the
ends of the pin, with a shop rag, may free the pin and improve its rotation. If the pin does not
rotate, examine the uplock pin bushings (Messier-Dowty CMM 32-10-15 IPL Figure 3, Item
151A) in each bracket for signs of migration. If bushing migration is apparent, refer to Messier-
Dowty CMM 32-10-15, Repair section for procedures for installation of replacement bushings.
cure time) for in-service aircraft. The introduction of a more robust cargo compartment into
production is also in progress.
Several materials have already been evaluated. Flammability tests were performed using Akro
Fireguard 304 and Permaglass 166 on-ramp repair kits adhered to our phenolic honeycomb
sidewall panels. These materials did not meet current FAR requirements.
Bombardier’s flammability specialists are presently working in conjunction with the sidewall
manufacturer (L’hotellier Montrichard) and Transport Canada. Their combined efforts will
result in further flammability testing of three sample types: MCGill’s Gilpatch, a retest of
Permaglass 166, a wet lay-up repair (developed by L’hotellier Montrichard). These tests are to
be carried out May/June, 1999 in Paris. Should one or more of these repair kits meet the FAR
requirements, a revision to the CMM will include them as an approved on-ramp repair.
Existing approved repairs for sidewalls, bulkheads and floor panels are available from the CRJ
Action Center, and are listed as follows:
1) REO 601R-25-53-005 (July ‘95) enables operators to rivet stainless steel patches to
sidewalls
2) REO 601R-25-53-003 (Oct. ‘97) enables operators to cover the aft face of the 9G
bulkhead with Giliner. Once installed, if this Giliner ever becomes damaged, a Gilpatch
may be used for it’s repair.
3) The CMM from C&D Interiors, enables the use of a peel and stick silicon fireblock repair
for the aft side of the 9G bulkhead (June ‘98). CMM ref: 53-10-01 Section 7 Rev. 8.
4) The cargo floor panel can be replaced by a heavy duty version, available from Comtek
Advance Structures on STC # A21EA (Feb. ‘97).
5) Approved cargo floor panel repairs for wet lay-up and re-potting of inserts are called out in
the Ciba Geigy CMM, ref: CGFP-02 Rev. A.
13
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
GE have issued a “CF34 Engineering Note” #99-02, 2/1/99, which includes an improved
connector cleaning procedure which will be included in the next revision of GE Engine Manual
SEI 756, 72-00-00, Special Procedure 10.
14
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
TOP 25 LIST
November 2, 1998
PRIORITY NO. ATA PART NAME
1 27-50 Flap Actuator #3
2 27-60 Spoiler System - SECU
3 52-00 PAX Door a) Rigging b) Inner Skin c) Hinge Wear
4 27-50 Flap System
5 32-50 Nose Wheel Steering
6 56-10 Flight Compartment Windows
7 57-00 Wing Leading Edge Sealant
8 25-50 Cargo Compartment Liners
9 32-20 NLG Noise on Retraction
10 32-00 Landing Gear Manual Release
11 34-00 Pitot/Static System
12 30-30 Air Data Sensor Heater Controller
13 49-00 APU Inlet Door
14 29-00 AC Motor Pump
15 30-20 Cowl Anti-Ice Relief Valve
16 27-40 HSTCS – HSTA, MCU
17 21-60 Cabin Comfort
18 52-30 Cargo Door Balance Spring
19 78-30 Thrust Reverser - -8 PDU
20 80-00 Engine Air Starter
15
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
16
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
17
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
601R-23-017I 18 Dec 98 Installation of the Provision for the 3rd VHF Comm No
601R-23-031F 26 Nov 98 Cockpit Voice Recorder No
601R-23-045B 10 Nov 98 Introduction of the T.E.A.M. Boarding Music System No
601R-24-066 30 Nov 98 Replacement of Backshell of P3re No
601R-24-085D 08 Jan 99 Replacement of Battery Charger (Main & APU) Yes
Connector
601R-25-152 26 Dec 98 Removal of Insulation from Emergency Exit Hatch Yes
Surround
601R-27-097 05 Nov 98 Flight Controls – Wing – Outbd Flaps and Lower Skin Yes
Inspection
601R-27-098A 27 Nov 98 Apply Witness Marks on the Flaps Under Skin for No
20° Visual
601R-28-024A 11 Nov 98 Fuel Vent System Installation Main Tank No
601R-31-016D 22 Dec 98 EICAS Update (Replacement of EFDs and DCUs No
601R-32-073 11 Nov 98 Main Landing Gear Trunnion Cross Pin Replacement Yes
601R-33-036B 10 Nov 98 Emergency Lighting System – Addition of Diode/Resistor No
Splice
601R-34-085E 11 Dec 98 Installation of an Onboard Data Loader No
601R-34-096G 27 Nov 98 Installation of the GPS Provision No
601R-34-103 03 Nov 98 GPS Partial Provision Installation No
601R-34-110 17 Nov 98 Installation of a Second GPS No
601R-34-112 17 Nov 98 Installation of a Second FMS (4200) No
601R-49-015 06 Nov 98 APU Oil Cooler – Special Rework to Exhaust Duct No
601R-52-085 07 Dec 98 Passenger Door Bonding Jumper Cable Replacement No
601R-53-037 24 Dec 98 Fuselage – General – Mod. Of the Floor Beam No
Structure at FS 280
601R-53-050B 26 Nov 98 Fuselage – General – Installation of an External No
Reinforcement Strap at FS 409+128
601R-57-010B 16 Jan 99 Landing/Taxi Light Window Replacement No
601R-57-022B 18 Dec 98 Introduction of Inboard Flap Vane Pad No
601R-71-023A 27 Oct 98 CF34-3B1 to CF34-3A1 Engine Replacement No
18
Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
Compiled By:
Miriam Rodgers Tracy E. Lloyd
CRJ In-Service Support Manager, CRJ In-Service Support
REGIONAL AIRCRAFT REGIONAL AIRCRAFT
For additional information on any of these in-service items, please contact the local
Bombardier Regional Aircraft Field Service Representative or Bombardier Regional
Aircraft Division, CRJ In-Service Support Department, 400 Chemin Cote Vertu
Ouest, Dorval, Quebec, Canada, H4S 1Y9; Telephone (514) 855-5000.
19
IN-SERVICE ACTIVITIES
Customer Canadair Regional Jet
BOMBARDIER REGIONAL AIRCRAFT CRJ FIELD SERVICE
& ASSIGNED
REPRESENTATIVES
LOCATIONS
2 Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
2
3 Report No. 99-01
May, 1999
3
4 Report No. 99-01
May, 1999