103E. Supplier Evaluation Checklist For Externally Provided Calibration

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that the document is evaluating a supplier's calibration capabilities and quality management system based on criteria like controls, procedures, traceability, certifications and more.

The purpose of the supplier evaluation document is to assess whether a supplier's calibration services, quality controls, and quality management system meet the needs and requirements of the customer (Welspun) to ensure they are capable and suitable to provide external calibration services.

The quality management system evaluation criteria include whether the supplier has a documented QMS, whether the QMS meets the requirements of ISO 17025 or an equivalent standard, and whether the supplier has a valid certification to their QMS.

Format No. QA/F/103E Rev.

01

WELSPUN Document No.


Revision No.
Quality Assurance Date
Document Supplier Evaluation for Externally Provided Calibration Page No. Page 1 of 4

Part A : General Details

Supplier’s Name
Supplier Location
Address

Contact Person Details

Part B : Supplier Evaluation

Section 1 - Verification of Controls Established by Supplier


Sr. # Assessment Criteria Observation / Finding / Evidence / Remark
Section 1.1 - Verification of Supplier’s Internal Controls
1 Review of requests, tenders and contracts
Does laboratory conduct a review the requests, tenders Yes / No
and contracts? Provide Details of Contract Review
(e.g. Procedure for Contract Review, Checklist Used for Review)
Provide Details of Sample Order for Which Contract Review is Verified
Does supplier has procedure of review the requests,
tenders and contracts?
Explain how does supplier review the requirements of
customer?
Does review process ensure following?
a) the requirements are adequately defined,
documented and understood;
b) the laboratory has the capability and resources to
meet the requirements;
c) where sub-suppliers are used, the laboratory advises
the customer of the specific laboratory activities to be
performed by the external provider and gains the
customer's approval;
d) the appropriate methods or procedures are selected
and are capable of meeting the customers'
requirements
2 Controls on selection of methods
Does laboratory use appropriate methods and
procedure for all laboratory activities?
Does laboratory use the latest valid version of a method
unless it is not appropriate or possible to do so?
When necessary, Does the application of the method
supplemented with additional details to ensure
consistent application?
3 Controls on handling of calibration items
Does laboratory has system for the unambiguous
identification of calibration items?
Is identification of item retained while the item is under
the responsibility of the laboratory?
4 Evaluation of measurement uncertainty
Format No. QA/F/103E Rev.01

WELSPUN Document No.


Revision No.
Quality Assurance Date
Document Supplier Evaluation for Externally Provided Calibration Page No. Page 2 of 4

Does laboratory evaluate the measurement uncertainty


for all calibrations?
5 Result reporting
Are results reviewed and authorized prior to release?
Are results provided accurately, clearly, unambiguously
and objectively?
Does Report (i.e. Calibration Certificate) include all the
information agreed with the customer and necessary
for the interpretation of the results and all information
required by the method used?
6 Non-conforming work
Does the laboratory has a procedure for work that do
not conform to its own procedures or the agreed
requirements of the customer (e.g. equipment or
environmental conditions are out of specified limits,
results of monitoring fail to meet specified criteria) ?
Are followings addressed for non-conforming work:
a) decision is taken on the acceptability of the
nonconforming work;
b) where necessary, the customer is notified and
work is recalled;
Section 1.2: Verification of Controls Established by Supplier on Sub-suppliers
1 Sub-Supplier Evaluation & Re-evaluation
Does Supplier determine and apply criteria for the
evaluation, selection, monitoring of performance, and
re-evaluation of sub-suppliers?
2 Purchasing Controls
Does supplier communicate its purchase requirements
to sub-suppliers?
Does it include followings?
a) the products and services to be provided;
b) the acceptance criteria;
c) activities that the laboratory, or its customer,
intends to perform at the external provider's
premises.
3 Verification of Purchased Products (Incoming
Inspection)
Does Supplier ensure that externally provided products
and services conform to the requirements?

Section 2 : Verification of Quality Management System


Sr. # Assessment Criteria Observation / Finding / Evidence / Remark
1 Does supplier have documented quality management Yes / No
system? Specify Reference of Quality Manual
2 Does quality management system satisfy the Yes / No
requirements of ISO 17025 or equivalent standard? Specify the QMS standard to which supplier’s quality management system comply
If yes, specify the standard(s).
3 Does supplier have certification for quality Yes / No
management system? Specify QMS Standard, Certificate No., Date of Issue, Validity, Certification Body,
Format No. QA/F/103E Rev.01

WELSPUN Document No.


Revision No.
Quality Assurance Date
Document Supplier Evaluation for Externally Provided Calibration Page No. Page 3 of 4

If yes, specify the details of certification. Accreditation Body, Scope & Exclusions.

Section 3 : Capability Assessment


Sr. # Assessment Criteria Observation / Finding / Evidence / Remark
Section 3.1 : Post Delivery Verification
1 Service Order Details
2 Ordered Service
3 Service Entry No.
4 Results of Post Delivery Verification
Section 3.2 : Capability Assessment
1 Service Range
Does supplier have past track record of providing the
calibration services with appropriate methods & range
for which Welspun seeks external supply?
2 Service
Does laboratory use documented procedures /
instructions to carry out calibration?
Is metrological traceability of measurement results
established by means of a documented unbroken chain
of calibrations, each contributing to the measurement
uncertainty, linking them to an appropriate reference?
Are measurement results traceable to International
System of Units (SI)?
Where reference materials are used for calibration,
does laboratory have certified values of these reference
materials? Are reference materials provided by a
manufacturer certified for ISO 17034?
Are equipment requiring calibration or which has a
defined period of validity labelled, coded or otherwise
identified to allow the user of the equipment to readily
identify the status of calibration or period of validity?
Are personnel performing calibration competent by
means of education, experience, training & skills?
3 Certification
Does laboratory has accredited quality management Yes / No
system as per ISO 17025 or equivalent ? If yes, Give details of certification:
Certification Body
Accreditation Body
Validity Period
Certificate No.

Part C : Results of Supplier Evaluation

Evaluation Result Satisfactory


Not Satisfactory
Gap Observed Against Evaluation Criteria
Format No. QA/F/103E Rev.01

WELSPUN Document No.


Revision No.
Quality Assurance Date
Document Supplier Evaluation for Externally Provided Calibration Page No. Page 4 of 4

Part D : Evaluation Review

Closure of Gaps Observed (If any)

Proposed Scope for Approval Calibration Discipline Electrotechnical / Mechanical / Thermal / Optical / Radiological / Fluid Flow
Any Limitations

Evaluation Done By Post Evaluation Review Done By


Signature

Name
Role
Date

You might also like