Non-Legal Measures For Loan Recovery
Non-Legal Measures For Loan Recovery
Non-Legal Measures For Loan Recovery
Non-legal measures for loan recovery include different strategies to ensure recovery of non-
performing loan other than resorting to debt recovery related court. Various such measures
are presented bewlow.
Communication: The most successful approach to loan recovery is keeping the borrower in
touch, arranging meeting of the borrowers at a regular intervals; making frequent telephone
calls, issuing letters and visiting the business center and residence of the borrower. The
personal visit might be done by the branch, regional office and head office personnel based
on the complexity of the situation. The bank may think of both the formal and informal visit
to borrower’s business premises and residence. The communication should be aimed at an
integrative ‘win-win’ interest-based negotiation.
Persuasion: The borrowers might be persuaded to repay the loan providing him/her
counseling on the negative aspects of non-repayment from legal and ethical point of view;
offering some kind of incentives to the borrowers including rescheduling of loan, waiver of
interest, etc. for timely payment of installment. Some sort of relief will be offered only when
the borrower is sincere and comes forward for instant adjustment of the outstanding
liabilities.
Simultaneously bank can put pressure on the borrower through family members, relatives,
guarantors, business associates, trade associations, employer in case of a salaried person, and
local influential persons. Bank can initiate dialogue/negotiation with the borrower, guarantor
for amicable settlement.
If friendly meeting, notice, first reminder letter, second reminder letter, personal visit asking
for payment do not work, a third and final notice asking for full adjustment as well as
informing the borrower that if the loan is not adjusted within the given time, the loan file
shall be transferred to the legal department/lawyer of the bank for filing suit. Besides all
these, the bank will continue to upkeep constant pressure on the borrower by meeting with
and issuing notice to the family members, relatives, guarantors, business associates, trade
associations, employer in case of a salaried person a local influential persons, etc. In the
event borrower is found reluctant, immediate steps should be taken for encashment of
securities held and filing of suit accordingly. Even after filing suit, bank can continue
1
dialogue/negotiation with the borrower/guarantor for amicable settlement and such settlement
can be informed to the court as per section 38 and 45 of Money Loan Court.
Motivating Credit Collection Staff: In most of the cases it is found that the bank employees
are ignorant about the effective recovery measures and/ or hesitant in loan recovery. The
bank employees can be motivated to sincerely work for loan recovery by providing
appropriate training, authority, incentives in the form of cash, kind, increments, promotion,
appreciation letter, etc through objective Key Performance Indicators.
Considering the importance of outside court settlement the government included the
provision of ADR first in 2003 in the Money Loan Court Act, 2003. Subsequently the same
Act was amended in 2010 with major revisions with regard to ADR procedure. According to
the amendment, ADR had been made a mandatory step for settling the default loan. Section
22, 23, 24, 25, 38, 44(A), 45 of MLC covers the legal procedures related to ADR.
2
external recovery agencies bear the responsibility of recovery of long-overdue loan. The
study found that a number of sample banks appointed Recovery Agents for recovery of stuck-
up loan cases. A loan case is transferred to a recovery agent only when the loan remains
unadjusted for long period of time instead of repeated persuasion and follow-up by the
branch; the borrower is untraceable/ absconding/unwilling to settle the account; there is
no/inadequate/defective collateral security and disposal of the security seems to be difficult.
But, the recovery agents should be monitored. If the loan cannot be recovered instead of all
out efforts then the banks shall file bankruptcy suit to declare the borrower bankrupt and
adjust the exposure accordingly.
Debt Restructuring
To restructure an NPL, the bank negotiates with the borrowers with the aim of strengthening
the ability of the later to service and eventually to repay the principal. This usually involves
redefining the terms of the original contract (may be increasing the grace period, increasing
the loan period thereby reducing repayment amount per installment, providing additional
loan if justified, inter alia). The process may also require some concessions on part of both
the lender and the borrower. Successful debt restructuring can benefit both the parties.
However, the process should be initiated only if the economic return from the rehabilitation
of the asset exceeds that of its liquidation (Woo, 2000).
3
Preparation and Circulation of List of Defaulters
Preparation and circulation of a list of borrowers contributes a lot in recovering NPL,
especially in case of large willful defaulters. It is observed that before the national election
many large defaulters apply for rescheduling their long-overdue loan and even, some make
full payment to have clean CIB report. Moreover, publishing the loan default news of listed
corporate by DSE also have some positive results, as recently observed by BDBL. The
Reserve Bank of India has put in place a system for periodical circulation of willful
defaulters’ list of banks and financial institutions. The RBI also publishes a list of borrowers
(with outstanding aggregate rupees one crore and above) against whom banks and financial
institutions have filed suits as on 31st March every year. [http://www.cdrindia.org/].
Waiver of Interest
In certain circumstances where full recovery of bad loan seems to be impossible, banks may
think of waiving certain amount of interest to recover the remaining outstanding. The
circumstances, inter alia, may include death or disability of borrower, incurrence of huge
loss, inadequate collateral, and inability of borrower as well as guarantor to adjust full loan
amount. While considering waiver of interest bank shall examine each case prudently and
judiciously and if there are genuine grounds, bank may initiate negotiation with the
borrower/guarantor to waive interest to get back its investment. However, bank can waive
accrued interest partly or fully but interest credited to P/L account cannot be waived.
Write Off
When a loan is written-off, the bank assumes loss equivalent to its book value and removes it
from the balance sheet. The bank will normally do so when the prospect of recovery is very
low and when the cost of recovery or maintenance of the asset exceeds its value (Woo, 2000).
Writing off an NPL is not an effective measure of loan recovery because by writing off a loan
a bank can simply remove it from the balance sheet and cannot ensure recovery unless banks
adopt stringent measures for recovery.
4
restructuring, including greater capital infusion from the public and private sector to weak
banks, merger, and acquisition.
Asset Securitization
Asset securitization is a process used by banks to transform their non-liquid assets to liquid
assets, thereby allowing them to allocate their capital more efficiently. In addition, asset
securitization also helps banks access diverse and cost-effective funding sources, and help in
the better management of business risks. In this process certain assets from the balance sheet
of a company get separated and are used as collateral for the issuance of securities. The
securitized assets like commercial papers, notes or bonds are typically sold through special
purpose vehicle (SPV) in order to provide funding.