Learning-Module - GE Hist-Print
Learning-Module - GE Hist-Print
Learning-Module - GE Hist-Print
LEARNING MODULE
IN
FOR
Introduction 3
2. Topics:
1) History Definition and Relevance
2) Primary versus Secondary Sources
3) Identification of Historical Importance of Text
4. Introduction:
This chapter deals with the different definition of history and its importance. It will also
discuss the distinction between primary and secondary sources.
5. Objectives
At the end of this unit, the students will be able to:
1. Explain the importance and definition of History;
2. Differentiate and list primary and secondary sources; and
3. Evaluate primary sources for their credibility, authenticity and provenance.
6. Pre-test
Students will have to think about or reflect on their past. Answer the following questions:
1. Has your past influenced you in one way or another?
2. How does your past shape your identity and behavior?
Discuss your answers in the class.
7. Learning Activities
Activity #1: Lecture Discussion on the meaning and relevance of History.
C. Sources of History: Information provide the evidence from which the historian obtain
facts about the past.
1. Early Sources of Philippine History
Religious orders which chronicled the history of the Philippines
include Augustinian, Franciscans, Dominicans, Jesuits, and
Recollects.
- Fray Pedro Chirino (1604) a Jesuit, and Fray Juan Plasencia (1589) are
among the religious friars who recorded observations of Filipino Society
and culture.
- Filipino Muslims were also able to preserve written materials of great
historical value.
Sarsila- Genealogical records of the datus or sultans of Sulu to
preserve the lineage of the ruling class
Tarsila- Genealogical records of the datus or sultans of
Maguindanao to preserve the lineage of the ruling class
Kitab- A book attributed to the late Hadji Butu Abdul Baqui,
Wazir of Sulu Sultanate, who tried to record the historical and
personal events of his time.
Philippine Insurgent Records (Philippine Revolutionary Records)
represents the records during the US suppression of Filipino from 1899-
1903.
2. Laws pertaining to the Repository of Filipiniana Materials
Public Law Act No. 1935- Creation of the Philippine Library, to
consolidate all libraries in the Philippine Colonial Government
Public Law No. 3477- Separation of National Museum and National Library
Executive Order No. 486, s. 1951 (Pres. Elpidio Quirino) & Executive
Order No. 39, s. 1963 (Pres. Diosdado Macapagal)- Collection of
histories and customs of each locality by public school teachers. These
records were known as the Historical Data Papers or Provincial
Histories, intended to replace government records destroyed during
WWII.
Secondary sources are sources have not been part of the event being
considered. It also refers to articles written about the primary sources
(e.g. magazines, newspapers, pamphlets, typescripts, and articles written
about the primary sources).
*Archeology studies and reconstructs the cultural events of the past through
the material remains left by people. Archeologists study artifacts and fossils.
Archeological excavation refers to the systematic recovery and study of
8. Self-evaluation
True or False. On the space provided, write the letter T if the statement is correct and F if
it is incorrect.
8. Review of Concepts
Understanding History
from Greek and Latin historia which means information; a learning or knowing by inquiry;
narrative of past events, account, tale or story.
“… a process of creation or a formation of culture, specifically a natural culture.” ~ Nick
Joaquin “An account of the unchanging past.” ~ Aristotle
“History is the unending dialogue between the past and the present.”
Challenge and response theory of Arnold Toynbee presents that man responds to
situation placed before him.
The exchange theory of Alvin Scaff on the other hand refers to the systematic statement of
principles that govern the exchange of goods (tangible and intangible) between individuals,
between groups, between organizations, and even nations.
For G.W.F Hegel, an idea is the moving force of history. He believes that man has a task to
do so that events may happen. Hegel’s role of the historical man follows a principle, which
he called Weltgeist or world spirit, which embodies ideals like patriotism, heroism, and unity.
Karl Marx’s the materialist concept of history asserts that the prevailing economic system
determines tha form of societal organization and the political and intellectual history of the
epoch, which thus attribute actions and events in history to economic motives.
9. Post-test
Read the excerpts below then do a comparative analysis. Write your answer on a sheet
of paper.
The following readings discuss the findings on the remains of what was then considered
the earliest known human remains in the Philippines – Tabon Man.
Robert B. Fox. The Tabon Caves: Archaeological Explorations and Excavations
on Palawan Island, Philippines (Manila, 1970) p. 40.
Tabon Man. - During the initial excavations of Tabon Cave June and July, 1962, the
scattered fossil bones of at least thre~ individuals were excavated, including a large
fragment of a frontal bone with the brows and portions of the nasal bones. These fossil
bones were recovered towards the rear of the cave alona b the left wall. Unfortunately, the
area in which the fossil human bones were recovered had been disturbed by Magapode
birds. It was not possible in 1962 to ·establish the association of these bones with a specific
flake assemblage, although they were provisionally related to either Flake Assemblage II or
III. Subsequent excavations in the same area now strongly suggest that the fossil human
bones were associated with Flake Assemblage III, for only the flakes of this assemblage
have been found to date in this area of the cave.3 The available data would suggest that
William Henry Scott. Prehispanic Source Materials for the Study of Philippine History
(Revised Edition) (Quezon City, 1984), pp. 14-15
The Tabon fragments are named after the Tabon Caves, where they were found on the west
coast of Palawan. The cave complex appears to have been a kind of Stone Age factory, with
both finished stone flake tools and waste core flakes having been found at four separate
levels in the main chamber. Charcoal left from three assemblages of cooking fires there has
been Carbon-14-dated to roughly 7000, 20,000, and 22,000 BCE. The right mandible of a
Homo sapiens, which dates to 29,000 BC, was discovered together with a skullcap. The
Tabon skull cap is considered the earliest skull cap of modern humans found in the
Philippines, and is thought to have belonged to a young female.The Tabon mandible is the
earliest evidence of human remains showing archaic characteristics of the mandible and
teeth. The Tabon tibia fragment, a bone from the lower leg, was found during the re-
excavation of the Tabon Cave complex by the National Museum of the Philippines. The
bone was sent to the National Museum of Natural History in France to be studied. An
accelerated carbon dating technique revealed a dating of 47,000 ± 11,000 years ago,
making it the oldest human fossil recovered in the complex.
The Tabon Cave complex is named after the "Tabon bird" (Tabon scrubfowl, Megapodius
cumingii), which deposited thick hard layers of guano during periods when the cave was
uninhabited, so that succeeding groups of tool-makers settled on a cement-like floor of bird
dung. About half of the 3,000 recovered specimens examined were discarded cores of a
material that had to have been transported from some distance. This indicates that the
inhabitants were engaged in tool manufacture. The Tabon fossils are considered to have
come from a third group of inhabitants, who worked the cave between 22,000 and 20,000
BCE. An earlier cave level lies so far below the level containing cooking fire assemblages
that it must represent Upper Pleistocene dates such as 45,000 or 50,000 years ago.
a. Which the primary source and the secondary source between the two readings?
b. Do a credibility analysis of the source. Who between the two authors is more credible
to talk about the topic?
Activity # 2
Direction. Choose the letter of the correct answer. Write the letter of the correct answer on
the provided before each number.
____ 2. Which of the following is the best way to understand and validate the rare books in
Philippine history?
A. Use the internet to verify the information written.
B. Use different books and authors to compare and contrast their views.
C. Consult the history experts to validate the data.
D. Knowledge in Spanish language is beneficial in validating the documents.
____ 3. The following are reasons why we need to study Readings in Philippine History,
except:
A. The information were direct quotations from the sources, therefore they narrate
history as they happen.
B. Today’s technology provided various information about history, hence readers
access for information is easier.
C. Some of the documents are conflicting and contradictory, thus readers must
develop critical thinking to discern its veracity.
D. Various documents were written by foreigners, consequently readers must
understand and adapt the interpretation as their own.
____ 4. The following are significant to consider, in order to validate the authors’
interpretation in writing History, except:
____ 5. Which of the following institutions had documents containing original deed of alse
written in Baybayin script and transcript of records of Filipino Heroes like Dr. Jose Rizal,
Apolinario Mabini and Fr. Jose Burgos?
A. San Juan de Letran
B. Escuela de Dibujos
C. University of Santo Thomas
D. Ateneo de Manila
10. References
Martinez Jr., R. (2018). The Readings in Philippine History, Manila: MINDSHAPERS CO.
INC.
Torres, J. (2018). BATIS: Sources in Philippine History, Quezon City: C&E Publishing,
Inc.
Umali, V., et al. (2018). Readings in Philippine History, Malabon City: Jodeh Publishing
Viana, A., et al. (2018). PAHIWATIG: A Guide for Understanding Readings in Philippine
History, Mandaluyong City: Books Atbp. Publishing Corp.
2. Topics:
1) First Voyage Around the World by Antonio (Pigafetta)
2) Customs of the Tagalogs by Juan de Placencia (Friar’s Account)
3) Kartilla ng Katipunan by Emilio Jacinto (Declaration of Principles)
4) Declaration of Philippine Independence (Proclamation)
4. Introduction:
This chapter focuses on historical sources in which our history is studied and written. In
analyzing these sources, historians made use of several methodologies and theories
so that they can properly write history and disseminate national identity.
5. Objectives
At the end of this unit, the students will be able to:
1. Explain the importance of Pigafetta’s account on the study of Philippine history;
2. Discuss the religious and spiritual practices and beliefs of early Filipinos; and
3. Examine the state of Philippine independence today.
6. Pre-test
Guide Questions:
1. Who is Antonio Pigafetta? What is his role in Magellan-Elcano expedition?
2. Why was Pigafetta’s journal not published?
3. What are the different customs of the Tagalogs that are still present and practiced
today?
4. What is KKK?
5. When is the declaration of Philippine Independence?
7. Learning Activities
Learning Activity #1:
Students will watch a video on youtube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v-
CRAm5apEZxI about First Voyage around the World by Antonio Pigafetta.
The answers will be written in a one whole sheet of paper. Students will answer the
following questions:
1. According to Pigafetta, how did the locals of the island welcome Magellan and his
crew?
2. How are the islander’s way of life, cultural practices, and religious beliefs described?
What does Pigafetta’s account tell us about the conditions of the Visayan islands in
the 16th century?
3. Based on Pigafetta’s account, how did the battle of Mactan start?
In these three cases, those who are maharlicas on both the father’s and mother’s side
continue to be so forever, and if it happens that they should become slaves, it is through
marriage.
If two persons married of whom one was a Maharlica and the other a slave, the children
were divided.
Maharlicas could not after marriage move from one village to another without paying a
certain fine in gold as arranged among them.
Investigations made and sentences passed by the datos must take place in the presence of
those of his barangay.
They had laws by which they condemned to death a man of low birth who insulted the
daughter or wife of a chief and witches.
For loans, the debtor is condemned to a life of toil. Borrowers become slaves and after the
death of the father, the children pay the debt.
For inheritance, the legitimate children of a father and mother inherit equally.
Dowries are given by men to the women’s parents before marriage. If the parents are both
alive, they both enjoy the use of it.
In case of divorce, if the wife left the husband for the purpose of marrying another, all her
dowry will go to the husband but if he did not marry another, the dowry was returned.
Taught in schools and debated in universities, the “Kartilya” is the best known
of all Katipunan texts. Making manifest the KKK’s principles and teachings, it was
printed as a small pamphlet for new members. It is the only document of any length
set in print by the Katipunan prior to August 1896 that is known to be still extant.
The earliest reference to the Kartilya yet found is in the minutes of a Supreme
Assembly meeting held in December 1895, which say the manifesto (“pahayag”) will
be priced at 4 kualta per copy. Whether it is the KKK branches or the individual
recruits who are to be charged this amount is not clear, and nor is it known whether
the title phrase - “To those who want to join this Katipunan” - truly means potential
recruits, or in practice should be taken to mean “To those who have just joined this
Katipunan.” If copies were sold to potential as well as actual recruits, needless to say,
there was a heightened risk they might fall into the wrong hands.
The Kartilya was still in use during the first phase of the revolution, and
Bonifacio was planning to print more copies shortly before he was killed. It may still
have been used during the second phase of the revolution, for a version survives in
the Philippine Insurgent Records that is stamped with the seal used by Artemio
Ricarte in 1899. This version contains basically the same text as is transcribed here,
but it bears a different title – “Final Declaration on Admission to the Katipunan”
Authorship of the Kartilya has always been credited to Emilio Jacinto, and
there is little doubt this attribution is sound: it dates back to the Sensacional
memoria of Isabelo de los Reyes, whose sources included several senior KKK
veterans, and it has never been challenged. Bonifacio, the story goes, had originally
intended that his “Decalogue” should be printed and handed to new recruits, but he
then read Jacinto’s Kartilya and decided it was superior. The two texts, though, are
not really comparable. Bonifacio seeks only to enumerate the duties of Katipunan
members, Jacinto couches his primer, four times as long, rather as a statement of
aspirations and ethical values. Bonifacio lists ten obligations; Jacinto presents
twelve “guiding principles” and fourteen “teachings”.
There are also parallels between the content of the two documents. Recruits to
the lodges were advised that Masonry “considera como hermanos todos los
hombres”; that they should renounce “todos los vicios”; and should “defenderás al
oprimido.” Within the Katipunan, said the Kartilya, “all are equal and true
brethren.” Members had to “renounce disorderly habits” and to “defend the
oppressed.”
===========================================
Tagalog text
KATIPUNAN
NANG MANGA
A. N. B.
SA MAY NASANG MAKISANIB
SA KATIPUNANG ITO
Sa pagkakailangan, na ang lahat na nagiibig pumasuk sa
katipunang ito, ay magkaroon ng lubos na pananalig at kaisipan sa mga
layong tinutungo at mga kaaralang pinaiiral, minarapat na ipakilala sa
kanila ang mga bagay na ito, at ng bukas makalawa’y huag silang magsisi
at tuparing maluag sa kalooban ang kanilang mga tutungkulin.
(*) Sa salitang tagalog katutura’y ang lahat nang tumubo sa Sangkapuluang ito;
sa makatuid, bisaya man, iloko man, kapangpangan man, etc., ay tagalog din.
Ang may mataas na kalooban inuuna ang puri sa pagpipita sa sarili; ang
may hamak na kalooban inuuna ang pagpipita sa sarili sa puri.
Ang babai ay huag mong tignang isang bagay na libangan lamang, kundi
isang katuang at karamay sa mga kahirapan nitong kabuhayan;
gamitan mo ng buong pagpipitagan ang kaniyang kahinaan, at
alalahanin ang inang pinagbuhata’t nagiwi sa iyong kasangulan.
SA HKAN. NG ________________________________
Ako’y si______________________________________
taong tubo sa bayan ng __________________________
hukuman ng ______________________ang katandaan ko
ng___________taon, ang hanap-buhay______________
ang kalagayan________________________________
at nananahan sa______________________________
daan ng____________________________________
Sa aking pagkabatid ng boong kagalingan
ng mga nililayon at ng mga aral, na inilalathala
ng KATIPUNAN ng mga A.N.B. ninais ng loob ko
ang makisanib dito. Sa bagay na ito’y aking
ipinamamanhik ng boong pitagan, na
marapating tangapin at mapakibilang na isa sa
mga anak ng katipunan: at tuloy nangangakong
tutupad at paiilalim sa mga aral at Kautusang
sinusunod dito.
______________________ika
____________ng buan ng
_________________
____________________ng taong 189__.
Nakabayad na ng
ukol sa pagpasuk
===========================================
English translation
ASSOCIATION
OF THE
SONS OF THE PEOPLE
This Association pursues a most worthy and momentous object: to unite the
hearts and minds of all the Tagalogs (*) by means of an inviolable oath, in order that
this union may be strong enough to tear aside the thick veil that obscures thought,
and to find the true path of Reason and Enlightenment.
(*The word Tagalog means all those born in this Archipelago; even a person who is a
Visayan, Ilocano, or Kapampangan, etc. is therefore a Tagalog too.)
One of the foremost rules here is true love of the native land and genuine
compassion for one another.
Poor, rich, ignorant, wise – here, all are equal and true brethren.
All acts contrary to noble and clean living are repugnant here, and hence the
life of anyone who wants to affiliate with this Association will be submitted to a
searching investigation.
Here, only actions are demanded and esteemed; hence anybody who is not
willing to act should not enter, no matter how good a speaker he might be.
Everybody also knows the need for money, which today is one of the main
things upon which we depend to bring sustenance to all. In this regard, the punctual
payment of dues is required: one peso upon entry and then twelve and a half
centimos each month. The custodian of the funds will periodically render an account
to the members, and each member has a right to examine the accounts, should he so
wish. The funds cannot be expended without the consent of the majority.
All this must be thought over and deliberated upon calmly, as it cannot be
accomplished or endured by anyone who has no love for his native land and no
genuine desire to promote Progress.
And for the upliftment of your mind and virtue, read the following
A good deed lacks virtue if it springs from a desire for personal profit and not
from a sincere desire to do good.
True charity resides in acts of compassion, in love for one’s fellow men, and in
making true Reason the measure of every move, deed and word.
Be their skin dark or pale, all men are equal. One can be superior to another
in knowledge, wealth and beauty... but not in being.
Don’t waste time; lost wealth may be recovered, but time lost is lost forever.
An intelligent man is he who takes care in everything he says and keeps quiet
about what must be kept secret.
Along the thorny path of life, the man leads the way and his wife and children
follow. If the leader goes the way of perdition, then so do those who are led.
Do not regard a woman as a mere plaything, but as a helpmate and partner in
the hardships of this existence. Have due regard to her weakness, and remember the
mother who brought you into this world and nurtured you in your infancy.
What you would not want done to your wife, daughter and sister, do not do to
the wife, daughter and sister of another.
A man’s worth does not come from him being a king, or in the height of his
nose and the whiteness of his face, or in him being a priest, a REPRESENTATIVE OF
GOD, or in his exalted position on the face of this earth. Pure and truly noble is he
who, though born in the forest and able to speak only his own tongue, behaves
decently, is true to his word, has dignity and honor, who is not an oppressor and does
not abet oppressors, who knows how to cherish and look after the land of his birth.
When these doctrines have spread and the brilliant sun of beloved liberty
shines on these poor Islands, and sheds its sweet light upon a united race, a people in
everlasting happiness, then the lives lost, the struggle and the suffering will have
been more than recompensed.
--------------------------
If the applicant understands all this, and believes he will be able to fulfil these
duties, he should put his request in writing, as follows:
I, _____________________________________________
IS___________YEARS, OCCUPATION_____________________
AT ____________________STREET OF ________________________
[Sgd.]
THE TREASURER
In the town of Cavite-Viejo, Province of Cavite, this 12th day of June 1898:
BEFORE ME, Ambrosio Rianzares Bautista, War Counsellor and Special Delegate
designated to proclaim and solemnize this Declaration of Independence by the Dictatorial
Government of the Philippines, pursuant to, and by virtue of, a Decree issued by the
Engregious Dictator Don Emilio Aguinaldo y Famy,
The undersigned assemblage of military chiefs and others of the army who could not attend,
as well as the representatives of the various towns,
Taking into account the fact that the people of this country are already tired of bearing the
ominous joke of Spanish domination,
Because of arbitrary arrests and abuses of the Civil Guards who cause deaths in connivance
with and even under the express orders of their superior officers who at times would order
the shooting of those placed under arrest under the pretext that they attempted to escape in
violation of known Rules and Regulations, which abuses were left unpunished, and because
of unjust deportations of illustrious Filipinos, especially those decreed by General Blanco at
the instigation of the Archbishop and friars interested in keeping them in ignorance for
egoistic and selfish ends, which deportations were carried out through processes more
execrable than those of the Inquisition which every civilized nation repudiates as a trial
without hearing.
Had resolved to start a revolution in August 1896 in order to regain the independence and
sovereignty of which the people had been deprived by Spain through Governor Miguel
Lopez de Legazpi who, continuing the course followed by his predecessor Ferdinand
Magellan who landed on the shores of Cebu and occupied said Island by means of a Pact of
Friendship with Chief Tupas, although he was killed in the battle that took place in said
shores to which battle he was provoked by Chief Kalipulako ** of Mactan who suspected his
evil designs, landed on the Island of Bohol by entering also into a Blood Compact with its
Chief Sikatuna, with the purpose of later taking by force the Island of Cebu, and because his
successor Tupas did not allow him to occupy it, he went to Manila, the capital, winning
likewise the friendship of its Chiefs Soliman and Lakandula, later taking possession of the
city and the whole Archipelago in the name of Spain by virtue of an order of King Philip II,
and with these historical precedents and because in international law the prescription
established by law to legalize the vicious acquisition of private property is not recognized,
the legitimacy of such revolution can not be put in doubt which was calmed but not complete
stifled by the pacification proposed by Don Pedro A. Paterno with Don Emilio Aguinaldo as
President of the Republic established in Biak-na-Bato and accepted by Governor-General
Don Fernando Primo De Rivera under terms, both written and oral, among them being a
general amnesty for all deported and convicted persons; that by reason of the non-fulfillment
of some of the terms, after the destruction of the plaza of Cavite, Don Emilio Aguinaldo
returned in order to initiate a new revolution and no sooner had he given the order to rise on
the 31st of last month when several towns anticipating the revolution, rose in revolt on the
28th , such that a Spanish contingent of 178 men, between Imus Cavite-Viejo, under the
command of major of the Marine Infantry capitulated , the revolutionary movement spreading
like wild fire to other towns of Cavite and the other provinces of Bataan, Pampanga,
Batangas, Bulacan, Laguna, and Morong, some of them with seaports and such was the
success of the victory of our arms, truly marvelous and without equal in the history of
And having as witness to the rectitude of our intentions the Supreme Judge of the Universe,
and under the protection of our Powerful and Humanitarian Nation, The United States of
America, we do hereby proclaim and declare solemnly in the name by authority of the people
of these Philippine Islands,
That they are and have the right to be free and independent; that they have ceased to have
allegiance to the Crown of Spain; that all political ties between them are should be
completely severed and annulled; and that, like other free and independent States, they
enjoy the full power to make War and Peace, conclude commercial treaties, enter into
alliances, regulate commerce, and do all other acts and things which and Independent State
Has right to do,
And imbued with firm confidence in Divine Providence, we hereby mutually bind ourselves to
support this Declaration with our lives, our fortunes, and with our sacred possession, our
Honor.
We recognize, approve, and ratify, with all the orders emanating from the same, the
Dictatorship established by Don Emilio Aguinaldo whom we reverse as the Supreme Head of
this Nation, which today begins to have a life of its own, in the conviction that he has been
the instrument chosen by God, inspite of his humble origin, to effectuate the redemption of
this unfortunate country as foretold by Dr. Don Jose Rizal in his magnificent verses which he
composed in his prison cell prior to his execution, liberating it from the Yoke of Spanish
domination,
And in punishment for the impunity with which the Government sanctioned the commission
of abuses by its officials, and for the unjust execution of Rizal and others who were sacrified
in order to please the insatiable friars in their hydropical thirst for vengeance against and
extermination of all those who oppose their Machiavellian ends, trampling upon the Penal
Code of these Islands, and of those suspected persons arrested by the Chiefs of
Detachments at the instigation of the friars, without any form nor semblance of trial and
without any spiritual aid of our sacred Religion; and likewise, and for the same ends, eminent
Filipino priest, Doctor Don Jose Burgos, Don Mariano Gomez, and Don Jacinto Zamora
were hanged whose innocent blood was shed due to the intrigues of these so-called
Religious corporations which made the authorities to believe that the military uprising at the
fort of San Felipe in Cavite on the night of January 21, 1872 was instigated by those Filipino
martyrs, thereby impeding the execution of the decree- sentence issued by the Council of
State in the appeal in the administrative case interposed by the secular clergy against the
Royal Orders that directed that the parishes under them within the jurisdiction of this
Bishopric be turned over to the Recollects in exchange for those controlled by them in
Mindanao which were to be transferred to the Jesuits, thus revoking them completely and
ordering the return of those parishes, all of which proceedings are on file with the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs to which they are sent last month of the year of the issuance of the proper
Royal Degree which, in turn, caused the grow of the tree of the liberty in our dear land that
Moreover, we confer upon our famous Dictator Don Emilio Aguinaldo all the powers
necessary to enable him to discharge the duties of Government, including the prerogatives
of granting pardon and amnesty,
And lastly, it was results unanimously that this Nation, already free and independent as of
this day, must used the same flag which up to now is being used, whose designed and
colored are found described in the attached drawing, the white triangle signifying the
distinctive emblem of the famous Society of the "Katipunan" which by means of its blood
compact inspired the masses to rise in revolution; the tree stars, signifying the three principal
Islands of these Archipelago - Luzon, Mindanao, and Panay where the revolutionary
movement started; the sun representing the gigantic step made by the son of the country
along the path of Progress and Civilization; the eight rays, signifying the eight provinces -
Manila, Cavite, Bulacan, Pampanga, Nueva Ecija, Bataan, Laguna, and Batangas - which
declares themselves in a state of war as soon as the first revolt was initiated; and the colors
of Blue, Red, and White, commemorating the flag of the United States of America, as a
manifestation of our profound gratitude towards this Great Nation for its disinterested
protection which it lent us and continues lending us.
And holding up this flag of ours, I present it to the gentlemen here assembled:
Who solemnly swear to recognize and defend it unto the last drop of their blood.
In witness thereof, I certify that this Act of Declaration of Independence was signed by me
and by all those here assembled including the only stranger who attended those
proceedings, a citizen of the U.S.A., Mr. L.M. Johnson, a Colonel of Artillery.
8. Self-evaluation
Comparative Analysis. Compare the point of view of the authors of the primary sources
below.
CRITERIA Mga Aral ng Katipunan Declaration of Philippine Independence
Speaker
Occasion
Audience
Purpose
Subject
Graphic Organizer. Fill the table with necessary details based on the “Customs of the
Tagalogs” by Fr. Juan de Plascencia and “Native Races and their Customs” by Fr. Francisco
Colin.
SOCIAL CLASSES EQUIVALENT DUTIES CHARACTERISTICS
AMONG TERMINOLOGY (Tagalogs) (Tagalogs)
TAGALOGS (From AMONG VISAYANS
top to bottom)
1.
3.
4.
Andres Bonifacio was also a member of La Liga Filipina, although he soon lost hope in
gaining reforms though peaceful means. This feeling was especially heightened when Jose
Rizal was exiled to Dapitan. Bonifacio became convinced that the only way the Philippines
could gain independence was through a revolution.
The Katipunan had colorful beginnings. As a symbol of the member’s loyalty, they performed
the solemn rite of sanduguan (blood compact), wherein each one signed his name with his
own blood..
The members agreed to recruit more people using the “triangle system” of enlistment. Each
original member would recruit tow new members who were not related to each other. Each
new member would do the same thing, and so on down the line. Members were also asked
to contribute one Real (about 25 centavos) each month in order to raise funds for the
association.
The “Kataastaasang Sanggunian” (supreme council) was the highest governing body of the
Katipunan. It was headed by a supremo, or president. Each province had a “Sangguaniang
Bayan” (Provincial Council) and each town had a “Sangguniang Balangay” (Popular
Council).
A dramatic feature of the ceremony was the formal unfurling of the Filipino flag amidst the
cheers of the people. At the same time, the Philippine National Anthem was played by the
band. Ambrosio Rianzares Bautista solemnly read the "Act of the Declaration of
Independence" which he himself wrote. The declaration was signed by 98 persons. One of
the signers was an American, L.M. Johnson, Colonel of Artillery.
10. Post-test
___________1. The maharlicas could not, after marriage, move from one village to another,
or from one barangay to another, without paying a certain fine in gold.
___________2. Investigations and sentences passed by the datos must take place in the
presence of those in his barangay.
___________3. Dowries are given by the women to the men’s parents.
___________4. History becomes a passive factor in the study of Philippine society.
___________5. Anitos mean “all powerful” or “maker of all things”.
___________6. After the death of Bonifacio, no one continued to fight against Spain.
___________7. Tim Richards said that The Kartilya is the best known of all Katipunan texts.
___________8. The main objective of KKK was to combine Philippines and Spain.
___________9. Katipunan was anchored on the political platform of separating the country
from Spain.
___________10. The Kartilya served as the primary lessons for the members of the
Katipunan.
1. Triangle
______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
2. Colors
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
3. Eight rays of the sun
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
4. Three stars
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
11. References
Martinez Jr., R. (2018). The Readings in Philippine History, Manila: MINDSHAPERS CO.
INC.
Torres, J. (2018). BATIS: Sources in Philippine History, Quezon City: C&E Publishing,
Inc.
Umali, V., et al. (2018). Readings in Philippine History, Malabon City: Jodeh Publishing
Viana, A., et al. (2018). PAHIWATIG: A Guide for Understanding Readings in Philippine
History, Mandaluyong City: Books Atbp. Publishing Corp.
2. Topics:
1) Site of the First Mass
2) Cavite Mutiny
3) Retraction of Rizal
4) Cry of Balintawak
4. Introduction:
This chapter discusses the existence of controversies and conflicting views of events
in Philippine history. As the saying in historical studies goes, “there is one past, but
many histories.” And this where the problem comes in: which account should we
believe?
5. Objectives
At the end of this unit, the students will be able to:
1. Criticize conflicting views concerning certain historical issues;
2. Compare and contrast views of prominent people on particular issues; and
3. Debate on controversial historical issues.
6. Pre-test
Research on one primary source and his/her account of a recent event. Develop five
to ten arguments that support the account or that show the reliability of the source.
Afterwards, present them in class and be ready to answer questions.
7. Learning Activities
Think-Pair Share. Students will have to choose at least one topic. Then, they will have to
answer the following questions:
Students will have to research from the Internet an article about the Site of the First
Mass. They may further check this link for more information about the topic:
https://journals.ateneo.edu/ojs/index.php/budhi/article/view/582/579
1. What are the issues concerning the site of the first Mass held in the Philippines?
2. Which of the contention on the site of the first Mass is more believable? Why?
3. Why is it significant to establish the accuracy of the details on the first mass?
The 12th of June of every year since 1898 is a very important event for all the
Filipinos. In this particular day, the entire Filipino nation as well as Filipino communities
all over the world gathers to celebrate the Philippines’ Independence Day. 1898 came to
Two major events happened in 1872, first was the 1872 Cavite Mutiny and the other
was the martyrdom of the three martyr priests in the persons of Fathers Mariano Gomes,
Jose Burgos and Jacinto Zamora (GOMBURZA). However, not all of us knew that there
were different accounts in reference to the said event. All Filipinos must know the
different sides of the story—since this event led to another tragic yet meaningful part of
our history—the execution of GOMBURZA which in effect a major factor in the
awakening of nationalism among the Filipinos.
Jose Montero y Vidal, a prolific Spanish historian documented the event and
highlighted it as an attempt of the Indios to overthrow the Spanish government in the
Philippines. Meanwhile, Gov. Gen. Rafael Izquierdo’s official report magnified the event
and made use of it to implicate the native clergy, which was then active in the call for
secularization. The two accounts complimented and corroborated with one other, only
that the general’s report was more spiteful. Initially, both Montero and Izquierdo scored
out that the abolition of privileges enjoyed by the workers of Cavite arsenal such as non-
payment of tributes and exemption from force labor were the main reasons of the
“revolution” as how they called it, however, other causes were enumerated by them
including the Spanish Revolution which overthrew the secular throne, dirty propagandas
proliferated by unrestrained press, democratic, liberal and republican books and
pamphlets reaching the Philippines, and most importantly, the presence of the native
clergy who out of animosity against the Spanish friars, “conspired and supported” the
rebels and enemies of Spain. In particular, Izquierdo blamed the unruly Spanish Press
for “stockpiling” malicious propagandas grasped by the Filipinos. He reported to the King
of Spain that the “rebels” wanted to overthrow the Spanish government to install a new
“hari” in the likes of Fathers Burgos and Zamora. The general even added that the
native clergy enticed other participants by giving them charismatic assurance that their
fight will not fail because God is with them coupled with handsome promises of rewards
such as employment, wealth, and ranks in the army. Izquierdo, in his report lambasted
the Indios as gullible and possessed an innate propensity for stealing.
The two Spaniards deemed that the event of 1872 was planned earlier and was
thought of it as a big conspiracy among educated leaders, mestizos, abogadillos or
native lawyers, residents of Manila and Cavite and the native clergy. They insinuated
that the conspirators of Manila and Cavite planned to liquidate high-ranking Spanish
officers to be followed by the massacre of the friars. The alleged pre-concerted signal
among the conspirators of Manila and Cavite was the firing of rockets from the walls of
Intramuros.
According to the accounts of the two, on 20 January 1872, the district of Sampaloc
celebrated the feast of the Virgin of Loreto, unfortunately participants to the feast
celebrated the occasion with the usual fireworks displays. Allegedly, those in Cavite
mistook the fireworks as the sign for the attack, and just like what was agreed upon, the
200-men contingent headed by Sergeant Lamadrid launched an attack targeting Spanish
officers at sight and seized the arsenal.
When the news reached the iron-fisted Gov. Izquierdo, he readily ordered the
reinforcement of the Spanish forces in Cavite to quell the revolt. The “revolution” was
easily crushed when the expected reinforcement from Manila did not come ashore.
On 20 January 1872, about 200 men comprised of soldiers, laborers of the arsenal,
and residents of Cavite headed by Sergeant Lamadrid rose in arms and assassinated
the commanding officer and Spanish officers in sight. The insurgents were expecting
support from the bulk of the army unfortunately, that didn’t happen. The news about the
mutiny reached authorities in Manila and Gen. Izquierdo immediately ordered the
reinforcement of Spanish troops in Cavite. After two days, the mutiny was officially
declared subdued.
Tavera believed that the Spanish friars and Izquierdo used the Cavite Mutiny as a
powerful lever by magnifying it as a full-blown conspiracy involving not only the native
army but also included residents of Cavite and Manila, and more importantly the native
clergy to overthrow the Spanish government in the Philippines. It is noteworthy that
during the time, the Central Government in Madrid announced its intention to deprive the
friars of all the powers of intervention in matters of civil government and the direction and
management of educational institutions. This turnout of events was believed by Tavera,
prompted the friars to do something drastic in their dire sedire to maintain power in the
Philippines.
The friars, fearing that their influence in the Philippines would be a thing of the past,
took advantage of the incident and presented it to the Spanish Government as a vast
conspiracy organized throughout the archipelago with the object of destroying Spanish
sovereignty. Tavera sadly confirmed that the Madrid government came to believe that
the scheme was true without any attempt to investigate the real facts or extent of the
alleged “revolution” reported by Izquierdo and the friars.
Considering the four accounts of the 1872 Mutiny, there were some basic facts that
remained to be unvarying: First, there was dissatisfaction among the workers of the
arsenal as well as the members of the native army after their privileges were drawn back
by Gen. Izquierdo; Second, Gen. Izquierdo introduced rigid and strict policies that made
the Filipinos move and turn away from Spanish government out of disgust; Third, the
Central Government failed to conduct an investigation on what truly transpired but relied
on reports of Izquierdo and the friars and the opinion of the public; Fourth, the happy
days of the friars were already numbered in 1872 when the Central Government in Spain
decided to deprive them of the power to intervene in government affairs as well as in the
direction and management of schools prompting them to commit frantic moves to extend
their stay and power; Fifth, the Filipino clergy members actively participated in the
secularization movement in order to allow Filipino priests to take hold of the parishes in
the country making them prey to the rage of the friars; Sixth, Filipinos during the time
were active participants, and responded to what they deemed as injustices; and Lastly,
the execution of GOMBURZA was a blunder on the part of the Spanish government, for
the action severed the ill-feelings of the Filipinos and the event inspired Filipino patriots
to call for reforms and eventually independence. There may be different versions of the
event, but one thing is certain, the 1872 Cavite Mutiny paved way for a momentous
1898.
The road to independence was rough and tough to toddle, many patriots named
and unnamed shed their bloods to attain reforms and achieve independence. 12 June
1898 may be a glorious event for us, but we should not forget that before we came
across to victory, our forefathers suffered enough. As weenjoy our freeedom, may we be
more historically aware of our past to have a better future ahead of us. And just like
what Elias said in Noli me Tangere, may we “not forget those who fell during the night.”
The flow of history is as inexorable as the tidal flow of an angry ocean. But ever so
often in our collective recollection, it is remembered that sometimes the skilful use of
forgery can redirect the flow of history itself.
In the Philippines today, forgery is usually resorted to redirect the flow of money from
the rightful beneficiary to the unworthy pockets of invisible people.
In October 1600, the Muslim Ottoman Army and a Christian army, led by Austrians,
with Hungarian, French, Maltese and German troops were battling it out for territory
called Kanizsa. The Ottoman army was outgunned and outmanned, but the Ottoman
commander, Tiryaki Hasan Pasha was a clever man. He knew that the Hungarians were
not too happy to be allied with the Austrians. So he sent fake letters, designed them to
be captured by the Austrians. The letters contained Hungarian alliance with Ottoman
forces. The Austrian upon reading the fake letters signed by a reliable source (obviously
forged) decided to kill all Hungarian soldiers.
The Hungarians revolted and the Christian army disintegrated from within. Thus, did
the Ottomans won the battle, by issuing forged communication.
During World War II, the British, to protect the secrecy of the Allied plan to invade
Sicily in 1943, launched operation Mincemeat. This was a deception campaign to
mislead German Intelligence about the real target of the start of the Allied Invasion of
Europe.
The body with the fake documents was found eventually and its documents seen by
German agents. The documents identified Sardinia and Corsica as the targets of the
Allied invasion. The Germans believed it, and was caught with their pants down when
allied forces hit the beaches of the real target, which was Sicily.
This kind of deception was also used by the British against the Germans in North
Africa. They placed a map of British minefields, then attached them to a corpse. The
minefields were non-existent but the Germans saw the map and considered it true. Thus,
they rerouted their tanks to areas with soft sand where they bogged down.
In 1944, a Japanese sea plane crashed near Cebu. According to Japanese military
officials who were captured, and later released, they were accompanying Gen. Koga,
Commander in Chief of the Japanese Combined Fleet. Gen. Koga died in the crash. A
little later, Filipino fisherman recovered some Japanese documents. They delivered the
documents to US Intelligence. The documents revealed that Leyte was lightly defended.
As a result, the Americans shifted their invasion target to Leyte instead of Cotabato Bay
in Mindanao.
On October 17, 1944 the invasion of Leyte went underway. Leyte was lightly
defended as the Koga papers have indicated. But it was during the invasion of Leyte
when the Japanese navy launched their last offensive strike against the US fleet, with
the objective of obliterating it once and for all. They nearly succeeded. After this near-
tragic event, the Koga papers were considered by some military strategists as spurious
and could have been manufactured by the Japanese to mislead the American navy into
thinking that Leyte was a defenceless island. That Leyte was a trap. And the Americans
nearly fell into it.
In recent memory, there was an incident in which the forging of documents served to
negate the existence of an independent Philippines.
The document of the retraction of Jose Rizal, too, is being hotly debated as to its
authenticity.
It was supposed to have been signed by Jose Rizal moments before his death.
There were many witnesses, most of them Jesuits. The document only surfaced for
public viewing on May 13, 1935. It was found by Fr. Manuel A. Gracia at the Catholic
hierarchy’s archive in Manila. But the original document was never shown to the public,
only reproductions of it.
However, Fr. Pio Pi, a Spanish Jesuit, reported that as early as 1907, the retraction
of Rizal was copied verbatim and published in Spain, and reprinted in Manila. Fr. Gracia,
who found the original document, also copied it verbatim.
In both reproductions, there were conflicting versions of the text. Add to this the date
of the signing was very clear in the original Spanish document which Rizal supposedly
signed. The date was “December 29, 1890.”
Later, another supposedly original document surfaced, it bears the date “December
29, 189C”. The number “0” was evidently altered to make it look like a letter C. Then still
later, another supposedly original version came up. It has the date “December 29, 1896”.
This time, the “0” became a “6”.
So which is which?
Those who strongly believed the faking of the Rizal retraction document, reported
that the forger of Rizal’s signature was Roman Roque, the man who also forged the
signature of Urbano Lacuna, which was used to capture Aguinaldo. The mastermind,
they say, in both Lacuna’s and Rizal’s signature forging was Lazaro Segovia. They were
approached by Spanish friars during the final day of the Filipino-American war to forge
Rizal’s signature.
This story was revealed by Antonio K. Abad, who heard the tale from Roman Roque
himself, them being neighbours.
To this day, the retraction issue is still raging like a wild fire in the forest of the night.
Others would like to believe that the purported retraction of Rizal was invented by the
friars to deflect the heroism of Rizal which was centered on the friar abuses.
Incidentally, Fr. Pio Pi, who copied verbatim Rizal’s retraction, also figured
prominently during the revolution. It was him, Andres Bonifacio reported, who had
intimated to Aguinaldo the cessation of agitation in exchange of pardon.
Surely, we must put the question of retraction to rest, though Rizal is a hero, whether
he retracted or not, we must investigate if he really did a turn-around. If he did not, and t
Cry of Balintawak
1. Based on the four accounts, what were the inconsistencies did you find on their
narratives?
2. Why did you think there were differences in their accounts?
3. Compare and contrast the four accounts and place in a chart the consistent and
inconsistent details in their narratives.
In 1935, Pio Valenzuela, along with Briccio Pantas and Enrique Pacheco said (in English
translation) "The first Cry of the revolution did not happen in Balintawak where the
monument is, but in a place called Pugad Lawin." In 1940, a research team of a forerunner
of the National Historical Institute (NHI) which included Valenzuela, identified the location as
part of sitio Gulod, Banlat, Kalookan City. IN 1964, the NHI described this location as the
house of Tandang Sora.[8]
The first place of refuge of Andres Bonifacio, Emilio Jacinto, Procopio, Bonifacio, Teodoro
Plata, Aguedo del Rosario, and myself was Balintawak, the first five arriving there on August
19, and I on August 20, 1896. The first place where some 500 members of the Katipunan
met on August 22, 1896, was the house and yard of Apolonio Samson at Kangkong. Aside
from the persons mentioned above, among those who were there were Briccio Pantas,
Alejandro Santiago, Ramon Bernardo, Apolonio Samson, and others. Here, views were only
exchanged, and no resolution was debated or adopted. It was at Pugad Lawin, the house,
store-house, and yard of Juan Ramos, son of Melchora Aquino, where over 1,000 members
of the Katipunan met and carried out considerable debate and discussion on August 23,
1896. The discussion was on whether or not the revolution against the Spanish government
should be started on August 29, 1896... After the tumultuous meeting, many of those present
tore their cedula certificates and shouted "Long live the Philippines! Long live the
Philippines!"
Work in pairs. Prepare a list of different factors or events that led to Filipino nationalism and
its implication in shaping our history. Compose your own version of an essay or poem
pertaining to “Love of Country”.
RUBRICS
COLLABORATIVE WORK
4 Very Good 3 Good 2 Fair 1 Poor
Involvement All members Members A member who A member who
supported a lot contributed contributed did not
of their effort. important ideas ideas for some participate in
and effort. time. group
preparation.
Action Taken Used time Used time Usual used Task was
effectively and effectively and time well rarely done by
sure that does not cause throughout the deadlines.
everybody the group for undertaking
does the task extension but may have
on time. because of interruption on
delay. one thing.
Quality of Work Provided task Provided high Provided work Did not do
of highest quality of work. that anything / the
quality. occasionally task was done
needs to be poorly.
redone by
9. Review of Concepts
ANTONIO PIGAFETTA
- around 1491 when he was born at Vicenza, Republic of Venice or was know now as Italy
and died at the aged of 39-40 around 1531
- He studied astronomy; geography and cartography
- an Italian scholar and explorer from the Republic of Venice
- He travelled with the Portuguese explorer Ferdinand Magellan and his crew on their First
Voyage around the world
- He was one of the 18 men who returned to Spain in 1522
*The first Catholic Mass in the Philippines was held on March 31, 1521 (Eastern Sunday)
* Father Pedro de Valderrama
* located at the Southern Leyte
* a popularly known as the birthplace of the Church in the Philippines.
* Holy First Mass marked the birth of Roman Catholicism in the Philippines.
*1872 : A monument to commemorate the site of first mass on the Philippines was erected in
Butuan.
*1953: The people in Butuan asked the Philippine Historical Committee to rehabilitate the
monument or place a marker on the site.
*On the basis of this objection the monument was re-erected but the marble slab stating it
was the site of first mass was removed.
*Zaide identified Masao in Butuan as the location of the first mass. The basis Zaide’s claim is
the diary of Antonio Pigafetta, chronicle of Magellan’s voyage
*Jaime de Veyra stated that the first mass was celebrated in Limawasa not in Butuan.
*Historian Pablo Pastells stating by the footnote to Francisco Colin’s Labor Evangelica that
Magellan did not go to Butuan but form Limasawa to Cebu.
* Francisco Albo ( pilot of Magellan’s flagship does not mention the first mass but he writes
that they erected a cross on a mountain which overlooked three islands the west and the
southwest.
* James Robertson agreed with Pastells in a footnote that “Mazua” was actually Limasawa.
* in the authentic account of Pigafetta, the port was not in Butuan but an island named
Mazua ( Masawa)
* Father Bernard studied all the Pigafetta’s maps, which place in Mazau off the southern tip
of the larger island of Leyte., a check with the modern maps will show that this jibes with
Limasawa and not Masao or Butuan.
Two major events happened in 1872, first was the 1872 Cavite Mutiny and the other was the
martyrdom of the three martyr priests in the persons of Fathers Mariano Gomes, Jose
Burgos and Jacinto Zamora (GOMBURZA). However, not all of us knew that there were
different accounts in reference to the said event. All Filipinos must know the different sides
of the story—since this event led to another tragic yet meaningful part of our history—the
(1) To save his family and town from further persecution. Rizal may have been told that he
faced the dilemma of signing the retraction or of having his relatives pursued by further
persecutions. Since he hoped his death would stop the persecution of his relatives, the
retraction may have seemed to him to be the only way of achieving that purpose.
(2) To give Josephine a legal status as his wife. Rizal, even though he for a time suspected
Josephine as a spy, seems to have become convinced that she now loved him, and he may
have desired to give her a legal status in the eyes of the church, and so provide for her
future.
(4) To help the church cut away from the disease, which harmed her. Rizal, did not desire to
injure the Roman Catholic Church, but to remove the cancer which ruined both church and
state in the Philippines -- friar control of land and domination by the government. He was
also struggling for freedom of thought and of conscience to the individual. He may have felt
that much of his propaganda had produced the insurrection, and have repented of that. His
letter to Paciano, written the night before his execution, supports that theory. It also had
been suggested that Rizal may have written the word “Catholic" in the broad sense of the
"Church Universal" as it is used by all branches of the Christian Church excepting the
Roman Catholics. All churches repeat, "I believe in the Holy Catholic Church," in this broad
sense.
Nineteenth-century journalists used the phrase “el grito de rebelion” or “the Cry of Rebellion”
to describe the momentous events sweeping the Spanish colonies; in Mexico it was the “Cry
of Dolores” (16 September 1810), Brazil the “City of Ypiraga” (7 September 1822), and in
Cuba the “Cry of Matanza” (24 February 1895). In August 1896, northeast of Manila,
Filipinos similarly declared their rebellion against the Spanish colonial government. It was
Manuel Sastron, the Spanish historian, who institutionalized the phrased for the Philippines
in his 1897 book, La Insurreccion en Filipinas. All these “Cries” were milestones in the
several colonial-to-nationalist histories of the world.
Direction: Direction: Use the list of person to answer the following questions. Write the
name on the space provided.
A.
C. Both A and B
11. References
Martinez Jr., R. (2018). The Readings in Philippine History, Manila: MINDSHAPERS CO.
INC.
Torres, J. (2018). BATIS: Sources in Philippine History, Quezon City: C&E Publishing,
Inc.
Umali, V., et al. (2018). Readings in Philippine History, Malabon City: Jodeh Publishing
Viana, A., et al. (2018). PAHIWATIG: A Guide for Understanding Readings in Philippine
History, Mandaluyong City: Books Atbp. Publishing Corp.
2. Topics:
1) History of Agrarian Reforms
2) The Constitution and Its Relevance to the People
3) History of Taxation in the Philippines
4. Introduction:
This chapter discusses the importance of studying the constitution in knowing our
history. It is also through constitution that our rights as citizens of the country are
recognized and enforced.
5. Objectives
At the end of this unit, the students will be able to:
1. Trace the history of the land reform program in the Philippines;
2. Explain the importance of a constitution in a nation; and
3. Argue for or against a current taxation issue.
6. Pre-test
ACRONYMS. Students will have to complete the abbreviations below.
1. CARPER –
2. COCAR –
3. CARL –
4. PARC –
5. PACUP –
6. GOCC –
7. PCGG –
8. GDP –
9. CARP –
10. R.A. & E.O.
7. Learning Activities
Cooperative Learning on Philippine Governance and Revenue Systems.
Students will form three groups and will have to research on History of Agrarian Reform
of the Philippines. They will be assigned of the following topics:
1. Pre-Colonial Times (Before 16th century) and the Spanish Era
2. American Era and Commonwealth Years (193501942)
3. Japanese Era
Another set of group will take the Government Initiatives on Agrarian Reform:
1. Manuel L. Quezon (1935-1944)
2. Manuel Roxas (1946-1948)
3. Elpidio Quirino (1948-1953)
4. Ramon Magsaysay (1953-1957)
5. Carlos P. Garcia (1957-1961)
6. Diosdasdo Macapagal (1961-1965)
7. Ferdinand E. Marcos (1965-1986)
8. Corazon C. Aquino (1986-1992)
9. Fidel V. Ramos (1992-1998)
Learning Activity #2
Lecture-Discussion on the Constitution of the Philippines.
Notes are provided for a smooth flow of discussion about the topic at hand.
9. Review of Concepts
Pre-Colonial Times (Before 16th Century)
• Land was commonly owned by the community known as barangay. This is a small unit of
government consisting of 30-100 families administered by the chiefs. Everyone in the
barangay regardless of status had access on the land and mutually shares resources and
the fruits of their labour. They believed and practiced the concept of “stewardship” where
relationship between man and nature is important.
• Land cultivation was done commonly by kaingin system or the slash and burn method
wherein land was cleared by burning the bushes before planting the crops or either land was
plowed and harrowed before planting.
• Maragtas Code seems to be the only recorded transaction of land sale during this time.
This tells us about the selling of the Panay Island by the natives to the ten Bornean datus in
exchange of a golden salakot and a long gold necklace.
SPANISH ERA (1521-1896)
• The colonial government at this period introduced a pueblo agriculture, a system wherein
native rural communities were organized into pueblo and each Christianized native family is
given a four to five hectares of land to cultivate. The pueblo agriculture practiced no share
cropper class or landless class.
• The native families were merely landholders and not landowners. By law, the land
assigned to them was the property of the Spanish King where they pay their colonial tributes
to the Spanish authorities in the form of agricultural products they produced.
• Through the Laws of the Indies, the Spanish crown awarded vast tracts of land to wit:
- a Friar lands for the religious orders;
-Repartiamentos for lands granted to the Spanish military as a reward for their service; and
-Encomienda a large tracts of land given to Spaniards
10. Post-test
I. Direction: Please write True if the statement is correct and False if it says otherwise.
___________1. The Philippine Revolution of 1896 was known as the “First Cry”.
___________2. The Katipunan remained a secret society all throughout the Spanish
period.
___________3. Andres Bonifacio designated a meeting place outside the city to plan the
revolution.
___________4. The story of the First Cry is found in Chapter 7 of the memoirs.
___________5. The account of Magsangkay was used by the government and civic
officials to fixt the date and place of the First Cry in the first decade of American rule.
___________6. During the first days of the Philippine Revolution, the Katipunan was
never defeated in the battle against the Spaniards.
___________7. Magdalo and Magdiwang groups decided to form a revolutionary
government which would lead the revolution.
___________8. Artemio Ricarte initially refused the position as Captain-General of the
revolutionary government.
___________9. Artermio Ricarte’s memoirs were published in English.
___________10. Andres Bonifacio wrote a letter to Emilio Aguinaldo a month after the
Tejeros elections.
___________11. The letter “K” in the middle of the sun in the Katipunan flag stood for
“Kalayaan”, according to Chairman Lumbreras.
___________12. Dr. Jose Rizal was allegedly persuaded by the Jesuits priest to retract
his masonic belief and writings.
___________13. Until today, there was a considerable doubt that Rizal made a
retraction.
___________14. Rizal’s retraction document was sent to the Archbishop of Manila.
___________15. Father Balaguer was the Archbishop of Cavite.
II. Direction: Choose the best answer being described in each item. Encircle the letter of
your choice.
16. This event said to be the signal to start the revolution against the Spaniards
a. Tejeros Convention
b. Pact of Biak na Bato
c. Treaty of Paris
d. Cry of Pugad Lawin
19. An assembly that was created to solve the problem between Magdiwang and
Magdalo.
a. Tejeros Convention
b. Pact of Biak na Bato
c. Treaty of Paris
d. Treaty of Tordesillas
22. When did the First Cry of the Philippine happened according to National Historical
Commission??
a. August 20, 1896
b. August 19, 1896
c. August 26, 1896
d. August 23, 1896
25. According to the account of Santiago Alvarez, what did the Filipinos shouted for the
revolution?
a. “Revolt!”
b. “Long Live the Philippines!”
c. “Long Live the Son’s of the People!”
d. “Long Live the Philippine Republic!”
26. According to the account of Guillermo Masangkay, what did the Filipinos shouted for
the revolution?
a. “Revolt!”
b. “Long Live the Philippines!”
c. “Long Live the Son’s of the People!”
d. “Long Live the Philippine Republic!”
27. According to the account of Dr. Pio Valenzuela, what did the Filipinos shouted for the
revolution?
a. “Revolt!”
b. “Long Live the Philippines!”
c. “Long Live the Son’s of the People!”
d. “Long Live the Philippine Republic!”
28. In what position was Bonifacio elected during the Tejeros Convention in 1897?
a. Comptroller
b. Secretary of Justice
c. Secretary of Interior
d. Secretary of War
33. Who solemnized the marriage of Josephine Bracken and Dr. Jose Rizal?
a. Fr. Vicente Balaguer
b. Fr. Pio Valenzuela
c. Fr. Pedro Damaso
d. Fr. Pio Pi
37. Who was the Jesuit Superior in the Philippines during the time when Rizal was
executed?
a. Fr. Vicente Balaguer
b. Fr. Pio Valenzuela
c. Fr. Pedro Damaso
d. Fr. Pio Pi
39. Who was the Assistant Colonial Secretary and Magistrate in Hongkong?
40. Who was the Archbishop of Manila at the time when Rizal was executed?
a. Fr. Vicente Balaguer
b. Fr. Pio Valenzuela
c. Fr. Pedro Damaso
d. Fr. Bernardino Nozaleda
11. References
Martinez Jr., R. (2018). The Readings in Philippine History, Manila: MINDSHAPERS CO.
INC.
Torres, J. (2018). BATIS: Sources in Philippine History, Quezon City: C&E Publishing,
Inc.
Umali, V., et al. (2018). Readings in Philippine History, Malabon City: Jodeh Publishing
Viana, A., et al. (2018). PAHIWATIG: A Guide for Understanding Readings in Philippine
History, Mandaluyong City: Books Atbp. Publishing Corp.