Chap1F Scale Up

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 19

SCALE-UP PRINCIPLES

SCALE-UP OBJECTIVES
+ Achieve same mixing quality in commercial tanks as in laboratory tanks
+Understand differences in the process result on scale-up

⇨ NOT POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN SAME COMBINATION OF FLOW AND


SHEAR

⇨ GEOMETRIC SIMILARITY EMPHASIZED ON SCALE-UP — REFERS TO


THE FOLLOWING PARAMETERS TO BE HELD CONSTANT

— Impeller type
— Impeller dimensions
•D/T in the typical range of 0.25 to 0.65
•b/D
•C/T
— Liquid height H1/T - increase in H1 would require multiple impellers
— Baffles B/T and number
g∆ρl/ρv2
Reynolds number ρ N D2
Re =
µ
 Ratio of inertial forces to viscous forces
 If inertial forces dominate, Re is large, and the system is turbulent
 If viscous forces dominate, Re is small and the system is laminar
Froude number N2 D
Fr =
g
A ratio of inertial and gravitational forces
Shape of liquid surface and surface flow patterns affected by gravitational fields
Fr is relevant to vortex formation, surface aeration and splashing
Weber number ρ N 2 D3
We =
σ
Ratio of inertial forces to interfacial tension
We is used when studying liquid-liquid dispersions, and is used for
fitting predictions of droplet size distributions
Q
Flow number Fl =
N D3
Characterises the discharge flowrate of an impeller
Used to compare pumping capacities of different impellers
In gas-liquid mixing, an aerated flow number, FlG is used for QG
FlG =
comparing gas flow rate and impeller volumetric flowrate N D3
Scale-up
The basis of scale-up must be chosen:
8 Geometric similarity
8 Kinematic similarity
8 Power per unit volume
8 Dynamic similarity
The skill required for reliable scale-up is
selecting what basis to use
Typically, two of these scaling rules can be
used together for scale-up (but geometric
similarity is usually one of these)
Geometric similarity
⇨All linear dimensions are scaled up equally
T1 = s x T2 D1 = s x D2 H1 = s x H2 etc.
⇨The large and small vessels look alike
⇨Any lack of data on e.g. the effect of changing aspect
ratio or D/T ratio does not affect the design
⇨There can be a shortfall with geometric similarity, e.g.
heat transfer area per unit volume
⇨Deviation from geometric similarity can be applied
under certain circumstances
Power per unit volume
Often adopted as a first approach to scaling
Correlations show whether P/V should
increase, decrease or remain constant on
scale-up
Scale-up problems:
@ Excessive power requirements at large scale
@ Scaling rules must be identified from
correlations or pilot scale tests
@ Two process requirements may have different
scale-up exponents
Scale-Up by
Power/Volume
Dynamic Similarity
Make use of dimensionless groups
Each dimensionless group, being a ratio of two
dynamic quantities may need to be preserved on
scaleup
Example: Dimensionless mixing time (Nθ) is constant
for geometrically similar systems
Constant Froude number for systems in which
vortexing for gas entrainment is required
The relationship between process performance at
different scales and the dimensionless group may not
be linear. Use pilot scale testing to confirm scale-up
rule
Kinematic similarity
Operating conditions chosen based on
characteristic velocities:
o Constant tip speed
o Constant superficial gas velocity
o Constant maximum liquid velocity in impeller
discharge
Disadvantages
o Other process parameters may not scale
correctly
o Liquid flow patterns, reaction rates, mass
transfer
Scale-Up NDX = Constant:
Liquid Blending
∗ In the turbulent regime, Nθ=constant, but this leads to excessive power
requirements (P∝T5)
∗ If very rapid mixing is required, a number of smaller vessel or a high-
intensity in-line device should be considered
∗ Mixing time generally increases on scale-up
Solid-liquid mixing
If a solid-liquid system is scaled-up by keeping at Njs,
solids distribution will be worse at large scale
Maintain constant power per unit volume on scale-up
Liquid droplet dispersion
For constant droplet size in a non-coalescing system, keep
constant maximum energy dissipation rate
Liquid circulation times increase if scaling on constant εmax,
so coalescence rates will increase. ε must be increased to keep
droplet size constant in a coalescing system
Gas-liquid Mixing
For constant hold-up and mass transfer rate, keep P/V and Vsg constant
P/V can be difficult to predict at large scale
Scale up at constant VVM requires increase in P/V to overcome impeller flooding

Heat transfer
⇨Heat transfer rate per unit volume = U A ∆T / V
will decrease on scale-up for a geometrically similar system
⇨U cannot be increased dramatically without huge impeller power draws
⇨Increasing ∆T has limits (refrigerated cooling systems are expensive)
⇨Options can be sought for increasing A
⇨Recirculate fluid through an external heat exchanger
⇨Fit cooling coils inside the vessel
⇨Reflux a volatile chemical and remove the heat in the headspace through
re-condensing (auto-refrigeration)
⇨Make the baffles into extra area for heat exchange (10-20% improvement)
⇨Tall, thin vessel
Summary of scale-up rules
Processes Rules
 Miscible liquid blending Equal tip speed ND = constant
 Solids suspension NjsD0.85 = constant
 Solids Distribution Equal Power/Volume
 Gas-liquid mixing: Constant hold-up Equal Power/Vol
and mass transfer & equal Vsg
 Immiscible liquid mixing;
constant droplet size Constant Vtip or constant P/V,
(depends on breakage mechanism)
 Heat transfer Equal Reynolds number
 Fast chemical reactions Equal mixing time: N=constant

You might also like