This document discusses Morocco's blue economy and strategies to support its development. It examines how:
1) Increasing global fish demand could boost Morocco's fish exports and reduce its current account deficit.
2) Fishermen face low wages and seasonal/structural unemployment, contributing to poverty.
3) Regulating fishing could sustain economic growth by ensuring stable fish stocks and employment in the sector over time.
4) Subsidizing fishermen could lower costs and boost exports, employment and living standards, though it risks overreliance on the primary sector.
5) Reducing trade protection could increase exports, investment, employment and development, but risks exports only benefiting foreign firms rather than
This document discusses Morocco's blue economy and strategies to support its development. It examines how:
1) Increasing global fish demand could boost Morocco's fish exports and reduce its current account deficit.
2) Fishermen face low wages and seasonal/structural unemployment, contributing to poverty.
3) Regulating fishing could sustain economic growth by ensuring stable fish stocks and employment in the sector over time.
4) Subsidizing fishermen could lower costs and boost exports, employment and living standards, though it risks overreliance on the primary sector.
5) Reducing trade protection could increase exports, investment, employment and development, but risks exports only benefiting foreign firms rather than
This document discusses Morocco's blue economy and strategies to support its development. It examines how:
1) Increasing global fish demand could boost Morocco's fish exports and reduce its current account deficit.
2) Fishermen face low wages and seasonal/structural unemployment, contributing to poverty.
3) Regulating fishing could sustain economic growth by ensuring stable fish stocks and employment in the sector over time.
4) Subsidizing fishermen could lower costs and boost exports, employment and living standards, though it risks overreliance on the primary sector.
5) Reducing trade protection could increase exports, investment, employment and development, but risks exports only benefiting foreign firms rather than
This document discusses Morocco's blue economy and strategies to support its development. It examines how:
1) Increasing global fish demand could boost Morocco's fish exports and reduce its current account deficit.
2) Fishermen face low wages and seasonal/structural unemployment, contributing to poverty.
3) Regulating fishing could sustain economic growth by ensuring stable fish stocks and employment in the sector over time.
4) Subsidizing fishermen could lower costs and boost exports, employment and living standards, though it risks overreliance on the primary sector.
5) Reducing trade protection could increase exports, investment, employment and development, but risks exports only benefiting foreign firms rather than
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
17 August 2021
Morocco’s blue economy – done by Robert Sandys-Thomas
A. $109B X 2 = $2.18B 100 1
B. Economic growth and full employment
C. Because they are a blue economy and so they use their ocean resources to help them and their economy and so if the global demand for fish increased this means people will want more fish and so they will buy more fish. This will lead to an increase in the exports of fish for Morocco and therefore leading to a reduction in the deficit in the Morocco’s current account of its balance of payments. D. Low wages – They are in the primary sector and so the goods they sell have no value added onto them and so are cheap. Due to this the fishermen wages must be low to make a profit for the firms, and this therefore puts them into poverty. Seasonal and structural unemployment – Due to them getting unemployed they will have no income and they are most likely to have no other skills but catching fish and so if they have no other skills, they will not be able to find other jobs and so remain unemployed and therefore going into poverty. E. In most cases as the GDP per head increases the percentage contribution of the primary sector to the GDP decreases. For example, Australia’s GDP per head is around 55000 and its percentage contribution of primary sector to GDP was around 3%. Whilst Pakistan’s GDP per head was around 2000 and its percentage contribution of the primary sector to its GDP was around 23%. But this is not always the case, some do not fit this trend, such as Malaysia’s GDP per head being higher than Bulgaria’s GDP per head but Malaysia’s percentage contribution of the primary sector to its GDP was also higher. Only on rare occasions do we see as GDP per head increases so does percentage contribution of the primary sector. The most common trend is that as GDP per head increase the percentage contribution of the primary sector to its GDP decreases. F. Regulation of fishing could ensure economic growth is sustained for the future generations because if they regulate the fish stocks the economy can continue its high economic growth rate. Future generations will now have fish stocks to carry on this high economic growth rate because in the future African countries will reduce their trade protection and so this ill therefore increase exports and this will therefore boost economic growth. This will therefore lead to more people being employed in the fishing industry in the economy and so more people will get out of poverty. This also means more people will have incomes and so more people will have a higher disposable income and therefore increasing consumption, and this will therefore lead to a higher economic growth. With more people having incomes tax revenues will increase and so more will be spent on health care, education, and infrastructure. Due to more people spent on these 3 things the living standards will increase and more people will have more skills and therefore increase the number of people employed and increase economic growth. G. Subsidies to fisherman could help the economy because if they subsidize these fishermen, it will mean their cost of production will decrease and therefore the products will now become cheaper. This will boost international competition and so this will increase the exports of the country leading to a balance of payment surplus. This will benefit the economy because the economy will have more foreign currency and have a positive impact on economic growth. Due to the government subsidizing fishermen the people will see it more beneficial to become fishermen and to open firms to employ fishermen and so this will increase the employment rate in the economy. Due to this more people will have incomes and higher disposable incomes therefore leading to an increase in tax revenues which will be spent on education, health care and infrastructure this will therefore increase the standard of living in the economy. However, it may not benefit the economy because they will be opportunity cost of spending that money of subsidizing fishermen instead of spending it on education, healthcare, and infrastructure. This will also lead to a greater reliance on the primary sector and as we have seen this will lead to a lower GDP per head and therefore becoming a less economically developed country. The country will be moving backwards instead it should be moving away from the primary sector not towards it. H. A reduction in trade protection will benefit Morocco because this will increase exports for Morocco and so this will bring in foreign currency into the country and improving the country. With this increase in exports the balance of payments will be a surplus. This will then attract foreign direct investment into the country as they will be able to see it is beneficial to start up a company in Morocco. This will then boost the employment rate because more people will be employed, and more firms will start to go up within the country. As the employment rate goes up more people will receive, and income and more people will have a higher disposable income, and this will therefore increase aggregate demand within the country. That means more products will be bought and so improving companies profit margins and so they will be able to pay their workers more and this will result in a decrease in poverty. Due to this tax revenue will increase and so more will be spent of education, healthcare, and infrastructure and so this will cause living standards to increase and cause a country to become more developed. However, this may not benefit the country of Morocco because all the goods produced will be sold to firms overseas and so they will be no more products for the local people and the companies that come to the country due to the exports will take their profits overseas and so not benefitting the country at all but making the situation worse for the country.
USC v CA GR L-79237 10/18/88 Facts Private respondent enrolled in the College of Architecture, University of San Carlos (USC), during the first semester of school year 1978-79. At the end of the second semester of that school year, she obtained a grade of "I.C." (Incomplete) in Architecture 121, and grades of "5's" (failures) in Architecture 122 and Architecture 123. The following school year, 1979-1980, she shifted to the College of Commerce of the USC. Some of the units she had completed when she was still an architecture student were then carried over and credited in her new course. As a commerce student, she obtained good grades. So, on December 10, 1981, she wrote 5 the Council of Deans of the USC, requesting that her grades of 5s in Architecture 121 and Architecture 122 be disregarded in the computation of her grade average. Issue WON the school be compelled by mandamus to allow the respondent to graduate with honors Held No. even if she succeeded in removing her failing grades