"DRESS" Method For Construction of Tunnel Near Rattanpur Adit
The DRESS method was used to construct a 360m tunnel through difficult ground with sheared rock and high water ingress near Rattanpur, India. DRESS stands for "Drainage Reinforcement Excavation Support Solution". It involves drilling drainage holes, grouting, installing steel pipe supports ahead of the face (forepoling), excavating in rounds and installing steel ribs and shotcrete support. Monitoring showed convergence was initially fast but slowed over time, with a maximum movement of 14.6cm over 460 days. Progress of up to 25m per month was achieved using this technique in very poor rock conditions.
"DRESS" Method For Construction of Tunnel Near Rattanpur Adit
The DRESS method was used to construct a 360m tunnel through difficult ground with sheared rock and high water ingress near Rattanpur, India. DRESS stands for "Drainage Reinforcement Excavation Support Solution". It involves drilling drainage holes, grouting, installing steel pipe supports ahead of the face (forepoling), excavating in rounds and installing steel ribs and shotcrete support. Monitoring showed convergence was initially fast but slowed over time, with a maximum movement of 14.6cm over 460 days. Progress of up to 25m per month was achieved using this technique in very poor rock conditions.
“DRESS” method for construction of tunnel near Rattanpur adit.
DRESS Method: In SJVNL (Sutlej Jal Vidyut Nigam Limited) Hydro-power
Project of India, a special method named as “DRESS” was employed for construction of tunnel in a wide shear zone, near Rattanpur adit. This length of about 360m was very difficult due to encountering of sheared rock, high ingress of water and high stress condition. DRESS is acronym for “Drainage Reinforcement Excavation Support Solution”. Though this was a hydropower tunnel, but the methodology can be applied in railway tunnel also, with similar ground conditions. Three alternatives (A, B & C) of tunneling advance with DRESS methodology were proposed, depending on the rock conditions. Alternatives A, B and C were proposed for the regions having GSI value < 15, 15 to 35 and 35 to 45 respectively. The steps involved in each alternative were as under: lternative Step Description A B C 1 Drainage/Exploratory Drill Hole E E E 2 Face Improvement by Grouting E E W 3 Steel Pipe Umbrella E E 4 Side Drift E E 5 Rock Reinforcement by Forepoling ahead of face E1 6 Radial Rock Reinforcement at the Face W W W 7 Temporary Invert (Top Heading) E E E 8 Enlargement of Heading E 9 Integration of Rock Reinforcement behind the face E W W 10 Improvement of Side Wall Footing E E E 11 Benching & Steel Arch Concrete Invert E E E 12 Rock Reinforcement of Bench Profile E E E 13 Final Lining E E E E–Essential, W–When & If Necessary, E1-Only in Left Wall The sequence of activities was as under: (i) Draining of Rock ahead of the face: Before opening of the face, advance drainage was done all around and ahead of the face, to eliminate the detrimental influence of water pressure on the face stability. Six to eight drainage holes of 77mm diameter up o 24m length, depending on the site strata, in an upwards inclination of 150, were drilled with a hydraulic drill using DTH hammer. M. S. Pipe of 50mm diameter 12m grouted and 12m perforated, protected with geo-textile were provided in the drilled drainage holes to avoid the blockage of drainage system. These drainage holes were provided in alternate forepoling blocks. (ii) Face Improvement: After providing the drainage system, stability of the face and ahead was improved by cement grouting with W/C ratio of 1:1. Sometimes when grouting was not possible due to encountering of gouge sheared material mixed with clay, the face was stabilized by Shotcreting and grouted anchor bars of 25mm diameter 8m long. (iii) Steel Pipe Forepole Umbrella Arch: Forepoling (casing) of steel pipes was provided ahead of the face before excavation of the face using the hydraulic drilling rig. In this the crown of the tunnel above springing level was supported with 12m long steel pipe forepoles (casing) of 114.3mm outer diameter with 6mm thick wall and in an upward direction of 60 over rib R1 of the block. The forepole were spaced @400mm c/c spacing. After drilling and installing of the forepoles, cement grout in W/C ratio of 0.75 to 0.45 was placed at a maximum pressure of 5 kg/cm2. (iv) Face Advance in Heading Excavation: After stabilizing the crown and the zone ahead of the tunnel face by forepoles, drainage holes, shotcreting and grouting, the tunnel advance in one forepoling block of 12m length was carried out up to 8.75m length of a variable diameter of excavation from 11.65m to 13.45m before the next block of forepoling. In this 8.75m length of tunnel advance, a total number of 12 sets of ribs of ISMB 300x140 @ 750mm c/c spacing were provided in a sequential advance of 0.75m to 1.50m depending upon the stand-up time of rock strata. Excavation was done by mechanical means in top heading up to 1.0m below springing level, in rounds of 0.75m to 1.50m in the form of half ring, leaving the central portion to brace the face and the walls against bulging/collapse. After protecting the crown with shotcrete & wire mesh, the excavated section was supported with ribs and the space between the rock surface and the rib intrados were filled with shotcrete. In the second round of excavation, the central portion was first excavated up to the previous round advance and again the excavation for this round was carried out in an advance of 1.5m in the same way as explained above. After excavating and supporting the forepoling block up to rib R12 (last rib of the block), the excavation of rib R1 of next block was done and the rib was installed and supported with wire mesh and shotcrete. The ribs were anchored at springing level with 25mm diameter 6m long cement grouted anchor bolts with ISMC 150x75 runners joining three to four sets of ribs. The face was then sealed off with shotcrete for improvement of face and ahead before start of excavation of next forepoling block. The excavated reach was further supported with radial rock reinforcement in the form of 32mm diameter 6m long hollow core self-drilling cement grouted rock bolts. Grout was then pumped through the bolts itself forcing out water, debris etc. and filling of all fissure’s voids and complete grouting of the bolt was ensured. A temporary invert arch of 350mm thick shotcrete was also provided to prevent heave of an unsupported invert and punching of steel ribs from the arch support into soft rock. (v) Benching Excavation: The benching excavation was taken up about 50m behind the face in order to have proper drainage system and stabilization of the heading strata. The benching was also done with hydraulic hammering technique. After finishing the excavation of benching, the side walls were protected with initial layer of 50mm thick shotcrete, followed by wire mesh fixing, extension of heading ribs in the benching and providing steel ribs arch invert. The spaces between the rock surface and intrados of the ribs on wall sides were filled with shotcrete and invert steel arch encased in 400mm thick M20 concrete. The benching profile was supported with 25m diameter 6.0m long cement grouted anchor bolt. (vi) Monitoring during Construction: The behaviour of the ground around the opening was closely monitored during the progress of construction with tape extensometer. In these squeezing rock conditions; it has been observed that the behaviour of the convergence was initially faster with respect to face distance and it subsided subsequently with the elapsed period of opening and face distance. Deformation in the ribs and cracks in shotcrete were observed in some of the reaches in the blocks but these were within permissible and safe limits. The maximum movement observed in 205m length of the tunnel excavated at that stage was to the tune of 14.6cm in an elapsed period of 460 days. Progress of up to 25m in a month was achieved in extremely poor rock conditions. Despite the initial investment for hydraulic rig, in view of such progress of work coupled with other factors like safety and stability of operations, DRESS was found most appropriate in extremely poor rock mass conditions.