Preview
Preview
Preview
EQUIPMENT
HANDBOOK
SCREENING
EQUIPMENT
HANDBOOK
for industrial and municipal
water and wastewater treatment
SECOND EDITION
Tom M. Pankratz
CRC P R E S S
Boca Raton London New York Washingon, D.C.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted material
is quoted with permission, and sources are indicated. A wide variety of references are listed. Reasonable
efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the authors and the publisher cannot
assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or for the consequences of their use.
Neither this book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic
or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or by any information storage or
retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.
The consent of CRC Press LLC does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for
creating new works, or for resale. Specific permission must be obtained in writing from CRC Press LLC
for such copying.
Direct all inquiries to CRC Press LLC, 2000 N.W. Corporate Blvd., Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are
used only for identification and explanation, without intent to infringe.
Foreword xi
Preface xiii
1. SCREEN APPLICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Electric Power Generation 1
Wood Products Industry 3
Miscellaneous Manufacturing and Processing
Irrigation Projects 4
Water Treatment Plants 4
Wastewater Treatment Plants 5
Combined Sewer Overflow 5
4. DRUM SCREENS . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Double Entry Drum Screen 93
Single Entry Drum Screen 98
Pump Suction Screen 98
Disc Screens 102
Glossary 257
Bibliography 273
Index 281
Foreword
resentatives. You'll find there's a screen to help you accomplish your goal.
From protecting downstream equipment to capturing by-products for
resale, from designing a new grass-roots plant to shoehorning a new
screen into an old plant to expand capacity, today's screen market offers the
solution you need, and this book will help you identify your options.
ROBINREDDY
Lake Blufi Illinois
Preface
I was not able to write anything about the bullfights for five years-and I
wish I would have waited for ten. However, if I had waited long enough I
probably never would have written anything at all since there is a tendency
when you really begin to learn something about a thing not to want to write
about it but rather to keep on learning about it always, and at no time, unless
you are very egotistical, which of course accounts for many books, will you
be able to say: now I know all about this and will write about it. Certainly
I do not say that now; every year I know there is more to learn, but I know
some things which may be interesting now, and I may be away from bull-
fights for a long time and I might as well write what I know about them now.
TOMPANKRATZ
League City,Texas
CHAPTER 1
Screen Applications
Nuclear and fossil fueled steam electric generating plants require ap-
proximately 500 to 1500 gallons of water per minute (32 to 96 L/s) per
megawatt of rated capacity. This water is primarily used for cooling pur-
poses in the plant's condensers and must be screened prior to use to pre-
vent clogging of tubes and openings in the surface and jet condensers, as
well as interfering with the proper operation of the circulating and con-
denser pumps.
Many power plants discharge the condenser exhaust directly to a lake,
ocean, or river that serves as a heat sink. Most newer power plants recycle
their condenser exhaust through cooling towers. Approximately 3 % to 5 %
of the recirculating water must be continually replaced to make up for
losses due to evaporation, drift, and blowdown. Such a "closed cycle" cool-
SCREEN APPLICATIONS
ing water system greatly reduces intake water requirements and, conse-
quently, the number of screens.
Traveling water screens and drum screens are used to fulfill the screen-
ing requirements at most power plants that use a surface cooling water
source. A large power plant that utilizes this "once through" approach in
its cooling water system may require as many as forty-eight individual
traveling water screens. These screens are usually preceded by a coarse
trash rack, equipped with a trash rake mechanism, to remove very large
and heavy debris.
Environmental conditions may require screens to be fitted with special
features to minimize their adverse affect on fish and other marine life.
Many traveling water screen manufacturers offer "fish screen" modifica-
tions for these applications.
Some power plants have successfully applied passive screening systems
for surface water intakes. These screens virtually eliminate problems asso-
ciated with debris handlinglremoval and may make compliance with en-
vironmental regulations easier.
Hydroelectric power stations in the northwestern United States may use
traveling water screens to screen the pumped recirculating water on a fish
ladder system. This is a relatively low flow application compared to the
other previously described power plant screen uses and usually requires
two or three screens.
Static screens and manually cleaned bar screens have been used success-
fully to dewater spray water produced by traveling water screens and drum
screens.
Miscellaneous Manufacturing and Processing 3
Pulp and paper plants are intensive users of raw water, requiring up to
20,000 gallons (76 m3) of water per ton of product. Many pulp, paper, and
saw mills generate their own electricity and use traveling water screens to
screen raw condenser feedwater and process water prior to its use.
Most mills process the logs used as raw materials for their product. The
logs are conveyed from the woodyard to large debarking drums via a
flume. Prior to being recycled, the flume water passes through a grit cham-
ber followed by one or more traveling water screens, static screens, or
rotary fine screens to remove bark, leaves, and twigs that have fallen off or
been removed during handling.
Some paper plants and kraft mills utilize static screens and rotary fine
screens in their waste treatment process, prior to clarification, to remove
and/or recover floating and suspended fibers and other particles that might
hinder sedimentation. Other fine screen applications in paper and pulp
mills include broke thickening, save-all, and whitewater screening.
IRRIGATION PROJECTS
Large surface water treatment plants and desalination plants may em-
ploy traveling water screens, drum screens, bar screens, or passive screens
to screen raw intake water as the first step in the treatment process. Inade-
quate screening may result in damage to downstream equipment, may in-
crease chemical requirements, and may hinder the treatment process.
One or more bar screen and/or fine screen can be found at virtually
every wastewater treatment plant in the world. The type of screens used
ranges from manually cleaned, coarse bar screens to fully automated
microscreens.
Screens may be used in preliminary, primary, and tertiary treatment pro-
cesses in a wastewater treatment plant. The use of fine screens for the
screening of sludge, grease, scum, and solids produced in other treatment
processes has increased significantly since the mid-1980s.
Application examples and suggestions are further discussed in the Bar
Screen, Fine Screen, Drum Screen, and Microscreen chapters of this
book.
CSO's to install nine minimum controls, including the control of solid and
floatable materials in CSO discharges. One of the most effective methods
of meeting this requirement is to install screening equipment at the CSO
discharge. Bar screens, fine screens, drum screens, and traveling water
screens have all been used successfully in CSO systems.
References
Agranoff, J. (Editor), Modern Plastics Encyclopedia, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, NY (1982).
Bell, M. C. , Mussalli, Y. G. , Richards, R. T. , Taft, E. P. , Wagner, C. H. , Watts, F. J. Design of Water Intake Structures for Fish Protection,
American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY (1982).
Beischer, D. How Dry is Dry Enough? Water Environment & Technology, May 1994.
Borowiec, A. N. , Chack, J. J. , Lopez, A. R. , Melbinger, N. R. , The Bar Screens of New York, WPCF Operations Forum (1987).
Brady, G. S. and Clauser, H. R. , Materials Handbook, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, NY (1978).
Cravens, J. B. , Kormanik, R. A. , Wittman, J. W. , Innovative Application of Micro-screening in Lagoon Effluent Polishing, presented at The Sixth
Mid-America Conference on Environmental Engineering Design (1982).
Cravens, J. B. , Kormanik, R. A. , Wittman, J. W. , Evaluating Inlet Screens, W&WT Magazine, April, 1993.
Fletcher, R. A. , Risk Analysis for Fish Diversion Experiments: Pumped Intake Systems, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1985).
Gauthier, H. , Jackson, E. , LeGrand, A. , Simon, R. , Cooling Water Screens and Pumps in French Power Plants, EPRI Symposium on Condenser
Macrofouling Control Technologies: The State of the Art, Hyannis, MA (1983).
Hazen and Sawyer, Engineers , Process Design Manual for Suspended Solids Removal, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
(1975).
Henry, W. E. , Wenning, M. E. , Van Cott, W. , Solving the Zebra Mussel Dilemma, Public Works Magazine, November 1992.
Kemmer, F. N. (Technical Editor), Nalco Water Handbook, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, NY (1979).
Laughlin, J. E. and Roming, W. C. , Design of Rotary Fine Screen Facilities in Waste-water Treatment, Public Works, April, 1993.
Majewski, W. and Miller, D. C. (Editors), Predicting Effects of Power Plant Once-through Cooling on Aquatic Systems, UNESCO, Paris, France
(1979).
McGarry, J. A. , Lenhart, C. F. , Screening System Makes Downstream Life Simpler, WATER/Engineering & Management Magazine, June (1984).
274 McNamara, M. , Northeast Utilities , et al. , Development of High Performance Traveling Water Screen for Millstone Unit 3 Waer Intake, EPRI
Condenser Technology Conference (1993).
Mitchell, D. G. , Wastewater Washing Screens out Solids, Environmental Protection Magazine, September 1994.
Mussalli, Y. G. and Taft, E. P. Fish Return Systems, Proceedings from 25th Annual Hydraulics Division Specialty Conference, Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX (1977).
Mussalli, Y. G. , Stone & Webster Engineering Corp., and Hillman, R. E. , BAT-TELLE, Guidelines on Macrofouling Control Technology, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. (1987).
Mussalli, Y. G. , Stone & Webster, et al. , New Infiltration Intake System for Zebra Mussel Control and Larval Exclusion, EPRI Condenser Technology
Conference (1993).
Mussalli, Y. G. , Stone & Webster, et al. , EPRI Zebra Mussel Monitoring and Control Guide, EPRI Condenser Technology Conference (1993).
Nakato, T. , Gay, G. E. , Kennedy, J. F. , Model Tests of Proposed Intake Structures, Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, University of Iowa (1979).
OKeefe, W. , Intake Technology Moves Ahead, Power Magazine, New York, NY (1978).
Parker, S. P. (Editor-in-Chief), McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, NY (1984).
PEDco Environmental Inc. , Economic Analysis of Section 316(b) of FWPCA on the Steam Electric Utility Industry, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, D.C. (1977).
POWER Magazine , Low-cost intake structure saves on upkeep, Graw-Hill, Inc. (1973).
Public Works Magazine , A County-Wide Cooperative Water Project, November, 1991.
Public Works Magazine , New York Citys CSO Strategy, March, 1993.
Ray, S. S. , Snipes, R. L. and Tomljanovich, D. A. A State-of the-Art Report on Intake Technologies, TVA Power Research Staff, Chattanooga, TN
(1976).
Richards, R. T. , Fish ScreeningThe State of the Practical Art, Proceedings from 25th Annual Hydraulics Division Specialty Conference, Texas A&M
University College Station, TX (1977).
Roberge, John C. , Flow Characteristics of Hydrothane HDPE Trashrack Assemblies (undated).
Scott, J. B. , Dictionary of Civil Engineering, Halsted Press, New York, NY (1981).
Smith, R. D. , Young, P. J. , EPA Takes Action on CSO, Water Environment & Technology, April, 1993.
Strow, D. Continuous Operation of Traveling Water Screens, Unpublished, Hales Corners, WI (1987).
US EPA Municipal Operations Branch , Field Manual for Performance Evaluation and Troubleshooting at Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facilities,
Washington, D.C. (1978).
Updegraff, K. F. , Microscreens Applied to Wastewater Treatment Pond Effluent, presented at USEPAs Field Evaluation of I/A Technologies (1986).
Vanagel, M. A. , Swapping Clarifiers for Fine Screens, Waterworld Magazine, November, 1993.
275 Wahanik, R. J. Influence of Ice in the Design of Intakes, Proceedings from ASCE Specialty Conference on Applied Techniques for Cold
Environments, Fairbanks, AL (1987).
Walsh, K. M. Screening Your Options, Water Environment & Technology, October, 1993.
WEF & ASCE Joint Committee , Design of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants, Manual of Practice 8, 1992.
WPCF and AWWA Joint Committee , Wastewater Treatment Plant Design, A Manual of Practice, Lancaster Press Inc., Lancaster, PA (1977).
Zooplankton reduced at water treatment works Reprint from W&WT, November, 1990.