Exercise 4 CASE AOM

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Republic of the Philippines

COMMISSION ON AUDIT
Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao
OFFICE OF THE TEAM LEADER
Team 49 Audit Group D, Lanao del Sur
Department ABC BARMM
Matampay, Marawi City

AUDIT OBSERVATION MEMORANDUM (AOM)

AOM NO. 2017-001


June 25, 2017

For: REGIONAL DIRECTOR


Department ABC, Region III

Attention: Accountant
Cashier
Property Officer

We have audited the disbursement vouchers for the month of May 2017, and observed
the following deficiencies/errors:

Officials of Regional Office III exceeded their authority in approving the disbursements for
the purchase of computers and related computer supplies totaling Php 7,500,000.00,
contrary to General Memorandum Order (GMO) No. 003 dated January 6, 2000 issued by
the Secretary.

The Secretary approved and issued General Memorandum Order (GMO) No. 003 dated
January 6, 2000, setting a policy on delegation and providing for the rules on the authority to
certify and approve Disbursement Vouchers (DVs) which as follow:

Document
s Amount
Particular Signing Official
Authorized

Certified that expenses are


ARD for Operation / ARD for
Box A necessary, lawful and incurred Below Php1
Admin & Finance
under his direct supervision million
RD
Box C Approval for payment

Regional Director / Asst.


Certified that expenses are
Secretary concerned
Box A necessary, lawful and incurred
under his direct supervision Php1 million to
below Ph5 million
Undersecretary concerned /
Undersecretary for
Box C Approval for payment Administrative and Finance

Certified that expenses are Undersecretary concerned / Php5 million &


Box A necessary, lawful and incurred undersecretary for above
under his direct supervision Administrative and Finance
Box C Approval for payment Secretary

Furthermore, said memorandum provides that “All checks shall be signed by the Chief,
Cashier Section; and countersigned by the official approving the Disbursement Voucher”.

Audit of RO III showed that General Memorandum Order (GMO) No. 003 was
disregarded when the signing officials exceeded their authorities delegated under the GMO. The
approval authority of the Regional Director who signed Box C and of the Asst. RD who certified
on Box A of about seven disbursement vouchers totaling P7.5 million were exceeded, when the
signing officials should act within the limits provided in the above table. A summary of the
infringed transactions is shown below:

Signatory to DV
DV# Amount Actual Should Be
Box A Box C Box A Box C
1 1,100,000 ARD for Operation RD RD USEC

2 1,100,000 ARD for Operation USEC


RD RD

3 1,100,000 ARD for Operation USEC


RD RD
RD RD
4 1,050,000 ARD for Admin & Finance USEC

5 1,050,000 ARD for Admin & Finance RD RD USEC

6 1,000,000 ARD for Admin & Finance USEC


RD RD

7 1,100,000 ARD for Admin & Finance USEC


RD RD
Tota
7,500,000
l

In addition, from the above transactions, about 7 checks were subsequently counter
signed beyond authority of the RD, instead of the Undersecretary. This failure to comply by the
approving officer, as provided in GMO No. 003 pertaining to the authority to certify and approve
disbursement as to the limitation of the amounts, is tantamount to usurpation of authority and
signify illegal transactions.

We recommend that the concerned official should faithfully observe the provisions
of GMO No. 003 as approved by the Secretary in the exercise of signing authorities.
Administrative sanctions provided therein and appropriate laws and rules should also be
enforced.

May we have your comments on the foregoing audit observations within fifteen (15)
calendar days from receipt hereof.

LANTUD M. MAHATMA
State Auditor IV
Audit Team Leader

RASDY S. GUILING
OIC – Supervising Auditor

Proof of Receipt of AOM:

___________________
Date:______________

___________________
Date:______________

Page 2 of 3
2. Not highlighted

 Splitting of Purchase Orders as prohibited in COA Circular No. 76-41.


 Specifications of computers purchased are not fully not in accordance with the
specifications recommended by Task Force and provided in the Computerization
Program Memorandum/Document.

3. Evidence missing:

 Purchase Order
 Contracts
 APP
 Bidding Documents

4. Weaknesses in internal control:

 In process of Purchase Request


 Failure to inspect properly the purchased computers with regards to its
specifications.

5. Accounts affected:

 PPE accounts
 Material - Qualified due to departure from the PPSAS 17

6.

Page 3 of 3

You might also like